<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0300-9041</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Ginecología y obstetricia de México]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Ginecol. obstet. Méx.]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0300-9041</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Federación Mexicana de Colegios de Obstetricia y Ginecología A.C.]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0300-90412020000200071</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.24245/gom.v88i2.3031</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Días de gestación ganados con diferentes técnicas de cerclaje en pacientes con insuficiencia cervical]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Gestational days gained with different cerclage techniques in patients with cervical incompetence]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ibarra-Fortes]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Mariana Alejandra]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ortega-Martín del Campo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Eduardo]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Carrera-Lomas]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Emmanuel]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Stuht-López]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Daniela]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Stern-Colin y Nunes]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Jaroslav]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad La Salle Facultad Mexicana de Medicina ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Ciudad de México ]]></addr-line>
<country>Mexico</country>
</aff>
<aff id="Af2">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad La Salle Facultad Mexicana de Medicina ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Ciudad de México ]]></addr-line>
<country>Mexico</country>
</aff>
<aff id="Af3">
<institution><![CDATA[,Hospital Ángeles del Pedregal  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Ciudad de México ]]></addr-line>
<country>Mexico</country>
</aff>
<aff id="Af4">
<institution><![CDATA[,Hospital Ángeles del Pedregal  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Ciudad de México ]]></addr-line>
<country>Mexico</country>
</aff>
<aff id="Af5">
<institution><![CDATA[,Hospital Ángeles del Pedregal  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Ciudad de México ]]></addr-line>
<country>Mexico</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>00</month>
<year>2020</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>00</month>
<year>2020</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>88</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<fpage>71</fpage>
<lpage>79</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0300-90412020000200071&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0300-90412020000200071&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0300-90412020000200071&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Resumen  OBJETIVO: Reportar la experiencia en la práctica de cerclajes con indicación profiláctica y terapéutica en pacientes con embarazo único o múltiple, con insuficiencia cervical. Además, informar los días de gestación ganados y comparar las técnicas quirúrgicas con los cerclajes.  MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS:  Estudio retrospectivo, descriptivo, comparativo y transversal efectuado entre enero de 2011 y enero de 2018. Criterios de inclusión: pacientes a quienes se efectuó un cerclaje y el embarazo finalizó en nuestra unidad. Variables de estudio: edad, IMC, embarazos, abortos, días de gestación ganados, días en que se efectuó el procedimiento quirúrgico, semanas de gestación cumplidas a la finalización del embarazo, tiempo quirúrgico, medicamentos (tocolíticos y antibióticos), complicaciones a partir del cerclaje hasta la finalización del embarazo. Para el análisis descriptivo se utilizó el paquete estadístico IBM SPSS (versión 22); la distribución se obtuvo con t de Student, se aplicó la prueba de normalidad Shapiro-Wilk y las variables con distribución normal se analizaron, comparativamente, con ANOVA y las de distribución anormal con la prueba Kruskal-Wallis.  RESULTADOS: Se analizaron 37 casos en los que el cerclaje prolongó 116.14 ± 47.4 días la gestación, con finalización promedio del embarazo a los 246.41 ± 26.54 días. El cerclaje Shirodkar fue superior: prolongó la gestación 134.69 días con finalización del embarazo a las 36 ± 2 semanas.  CONCLUSIONES: En pacientes con insuficiencia cervical el cerclaje es una opción para prolongar el embarazo. La técnica Shirodkar tuvo márgenes de mayor seguridad hasta la finalización del embarazo (más de 34 semanas). El comportamiento en embarazos múltiples es similar, por lo que en caso de insuficiencia cervical debe aplicarse.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Abstract  OBJECTIVE: To report the experience in the practice of cerclages with prophylactic and therapeutic indication in patients with single or multiple pregnancy, with cervical incompetence. In addition, report the days of pregnancy gained, compare surgical techniques and cerclages in single and multiple gestations.  MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective, descriptive, comparative and cross-sectional study carried out between January 2011 and January 2018. Inclusion criteria: patients who had a cerclage and the pregnancy ended in our unit. Study variables: age, BMI, pregnancies, abortions, days of gestation earned, days in which they were placed, weeks of gestation completed at the end of pregnancy, surgical time, medications (tocolytics and antibiotics), complications from the placement of the cerclage until the end of pregnancy. For the descriptive analysis the statistical package IBM SPSS (version 22) was used; the distribution was obtained with Student&amp;apos;s t test, the Shapiro-Wilk normality test was applied and the variables with normal distribution were analyzed, comparatively, with ANOVA and those with abnormal distribution with the Kruskal-Wallis test.  RESULTS: 37 cases were analyzed in which the placement of cerclage prolonged 116.14 ± 47.4 days gestation, with an average termination of pregnancy at 246.41 ± 26.54 days. The Shirodkar cerclage was superior: it extended gestation 134.69 days with the end of pregnancy at 36 ± 2 weeks.  CONCLUSIONS: In patients with cervical incompetence cerclages are an option to prolong pregnancy. The Shirodkar technique had higher safety margins until the end of pregnancy (more than 34 weeks). The behavior in multiple pregnancies is similar, so in case of cervical incompetence should be applied.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Embarazo, múltiple]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[insuficiencia cervical]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[cerclaje, cervical]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[tocolíticos]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[índice de masa corporal]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[insuficiencia cervical uterina]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[antibióticos]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Pregnancy, multiple]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Cervical incompetence]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Cerclage, cervical]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Multiple gestations]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Tocolytics agents]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Body Mass Index]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Uterine Cervical Incompetence]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Antibiotics]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<label>1</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Brown]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Cervical Insufficiency and Cervical Cerclage]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Obstet Gynaecol Can]]></source>
<year>2019</year>
<volume>41</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>233-47</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<label>2</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Miller]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[ES]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Outcomes after physical examination-indicated cerclage in twin gestations]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Am J Obstet Gynecol]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>211</volume>
<numero>46</numero>
<issue>46</issue>
<page-range>e1-46.e5</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<label>3</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Suhag]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Berghella]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Cervical cerclage]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Clinical Obstet Gyneacol]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>57</volume>
<page-range>557-67</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<label>4</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Feltovich]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Cervical Evaluation From Ancient Medicine to Precision Medicine]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Obstet Gyneacol]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<page-range>1-13</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<label>5</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<collab>American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists</collab>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[ACOG Practice Bulletin No.142: Cerclage for the management of cervical insufficiency]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Obstet Gynecol.]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>123</volume>
<page-range>372-9</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<label>6</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Conde-Agudelo]]></surname>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Vaginal Progesterone is as Effective as Cervical Cerclage to Prevent Preterm Birth in Women with a Singleton Gestation, Previous Spontaneous Preterm Birth and a Short Cervix: Updated Indirect Comparison Meta-Analysis]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Am J Obstet Gynecol]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<volume>219</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>10-25</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<label>7</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Romero]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Vaginal progesterone for preventing preterm birth and adverse perinatal outcomes in singleton gestations with a short cervix: a meta-analysis of individual patient data]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Am J Obstet Gynecol]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<volume>218</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>161-80</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<label>8</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Boelig]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Berghella]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Current options for mechanical prevention of preterm birth]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Seminars in Perinatology]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<volume>41</volume>
<numero>8</numero>
<issue>8</issue>
<page-range>452-60</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<label>9</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Berghella]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Transvaginal cervical cerclage: evidence for perioperative management strategies]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Am J Obstet Gynecol]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>209</volume>
<page-range>181-92</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<label>10</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dahlke]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Cervical Cerclage During Periviability Can We Stabilize a Moving Target?]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Obstet Gynecol]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<volume>127</volume>
<page-range>934-40</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<label>11</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Murillo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Protocolo: cerclaje uterino]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Hospital Universitario Clinic Barcelona]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<label>12</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Han]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The impact of cerclage in twin pregnancies on preterm birth rate before 32 weeks]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[The Journal of Maternal-Fetal &amp; Neonatal Medicine]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<page-range>1-9</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<label>13</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Menocal]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Cerclaje de urgencia: experiencia institucional]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Perinatol Reprod Hum]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
<volume>15</volume>
<page-range>188-94</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
