<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0300-9041</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Ginecología y obstetricia de México]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Ginecol. obstet. Méx.]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0300-9041</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Federación Mexicana de Colegios de Obstetricia y Ginecología A.C.]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0300-90412019001200006</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.24245/gom.v87i12.3436</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Método anticonceptivo de elección en el postaborto]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Contraceptive method of choice post-abortion]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Valverde-Espinoza]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Natalia]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Barja-Ore]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[John]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,Licenciada en Obstetricia  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Lima ]]></addr-line>
<country>Perú</country>
</aff>
<aff id="Af2">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos Facultad de Medicina ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Lima ]]></addr-line>
<country>Perú</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>00</month>
<year>2019</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>00</month>
<year>2019</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>87</volume>
<numero>12</numero>
<fpage>814</fpage>
<lpage>819</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0300-90412019001200006&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0300-90412019001200006&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0300-90412019001200006&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Resumen  OBJETIVO:  Identificar el método anticonceptivo elegido por las pacientes atendidas en un Hospital de Lima, Perú, luego de un aborto.  MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS:  Estudio observacional, descriptivo, retrospectivo y transversal efectuado en el Hospital San Bartolomé de Lima, Perú, en 2017. Criterios de inclusión: pacientes con diagnóstico de aborto con evolución favorable y que recibieron consejería especializada de los distintos métodos anticonceptivos, sin importar si ya utilizaba alguno. Criterio de exclusión: pacientes con alguna complicación grave. La selección de las pacientes se efectuó mediante muestreo probabilístico aleatorio simple. Los datos se analizaron mediante estimación de frecuencias absolutas y relativas.  RESULTADOS:  Se incluyeron 116 mujeres que abortaron. El 28.4% optó por un método anticonceptivo; y de éstas, 6.9% optó por un método inyectable mensual, 6.9% por el inyectable trimestral, 6% por el oral combinado, 0.9% por el implante subdérmico, 1.7% por el dispositivo intrauterino y 0.9% por la ligadura de trompas. El 59.5% de las pacientes no estaban utilizando algún método anticonceptivo; el 62.9% tuvo, al menos, un aborto previo y 31.4% tuvo un aborto en su último embarazo.  CONCLUSIONES:  En esta muestra de estudio se apreció que la mayoría de las mujeres que por alguna causa abortaron no eligió un método anticonceptivo; no obstante, los inyectables mensuales y trimestrales fueron los más elegidos entre quienes sí optaron por uno.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Abstract  OBJECTIVE:  Identify the contraceptive method chosen by the patients treated at a Hospital in Lima, Peru, after an abortion.  MATERIALS AND METHODS:  An observational, descriptive, retrospective and cross-sectional study was carried out at the San Bartolomé Hospital, in Lima, Peru, in 2017; women who had a diagnosis of abortion with favorable evolution and who received specialized counseling in the different contraceptive methods were included, regardless of whether they used a previous one; while those that had a serious complication were excluded. The choice of contraceptive methods in post-abortion was studied and the selection of women was made through a simple random probabilistic sampling. For the data analysis, the estimation of absolute and relative frequencies was performed.  RESULTS:  116 women were included. 28.4% opted for a contraceptive method, and of these, 6.9% decided on a monthly injection, 6.9% for a quarterly injection, 6% for combined oral, 0.9% for a subdermal implant, 1.7% for an intrauterine device and 0.9% for tubal ligation. On the other hand, 59.5% of the observed women were not using a contraceptive method, in addition, 62.9% had at least one previous abortion and 31.4% had an abortion with their last pregnancy.  CONCLUSIONS:  In this study sample, it was appreciated that the majority of women who aborted for some reason did not choose a contraceptive method; however, monthly and quarterly injectables were the most chosen among those who did choose one.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Métodos anticonceptivos]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[aborto, inducido]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[aborto, espontáneo]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[anticoncepción intrauterina]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[consejería]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Contraceptive method]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Abortion, induced]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Abortion spontaneous]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Intrauterine devices]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Counseling]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<label>1</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Schwarcz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fescina]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Duverges]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Obstetricia]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<edition>6a ed</edition>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Argentina ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[El Ateneo]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<label>2</label><nlm-citation citation-type="">
<collab>Organización Mundial de la Salud</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Prevención del aborto peligroso]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<label>3</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Schreiber]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[CA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sober]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ratcliffe]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Creinin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MD]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Ovulation resumption after medical abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Contraception]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>84</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>230-3</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<label>4</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ohannessian]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jamin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Contraception après interruption volontaire de grossesse]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<volume>45</volume>
<numero>10</numero>
<issue>10</issue>
<page-range>1568-76</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<label>5</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Faúndes]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zaidi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Prevention of unsafe abortion: Analysis of the current situation and the task ahead]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Int J Gynecol Obstet]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<volume>110</volume>
<numero>^sSuppl 1</numero>
<issue>^sSuppl 1</issue>
<supplement>Suppl 1</supplement>
<page-range>S38-42</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<label>6</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Borges]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Post-abortion contraception:effects of contraception services and reproductive intention]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Cad. Saúde Pública]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<volume>32</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<label>7</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Morgan-Ortiz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Muñoz-Acosta]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Valdez-Quevedo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Quevedo-Castro]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Báez-Barraza]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Efecto del intervalo intergenésico postaborto en los resultados obstétricos y perinatales]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ginecol Obstet Mex]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<volume>78</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>46-52</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<label>8</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vilela]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Luciria]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Komura]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fujimori]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Boorges]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Alves]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[O]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Anticoncepción postaborto: atención y prácticas]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Rev Latino-Am Enfermagem]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>22</volume>
<numero>82</numero>
<issue>82</issue>
<page-range>293-300</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<label>9</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Morgan-Ortiz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Muñoz-Acosta]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Valdez-Quevedo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Quevedo-Castro]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Báez-Barraza]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Efecto del intervalo intergenésico postaborto en los resultados obstétricos y perinatales]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ginecol Obstet Mex]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<volume>78</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>46-52</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<label>10</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Huber]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Curtis]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Irani]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pappa]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Arrington]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Postabortion Care: 20 Years of Strong Evidence on Emergency Treatment, Family Planning, and Other Programming Components]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Rev Global health, sciencia and practice]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<volume>4</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>481-94</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<label>11</label><nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Salud]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Ministerio de]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Norma técnica de salud de planificación familiar]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Perú ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<label>12</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Banerjee]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gulati]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Andersen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Acre]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Warvadekar]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Navin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Associations Between Abortion Services and Acceptance of Postabortion Contraception in Six Indian States]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Stud Fam Plann]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<volume>46</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>387-403</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<label>13</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lira-Plascencia]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Velázquez-Ramírez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ibargüengoitia-Ochoa]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Montoya-Romero]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JJ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Castelazo-Morales]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Valerio-Castro]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Anticonceptivos de larga duración reversibles: una estrategia eficaz para la reducción de los embarazos no planeados]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ginecol Obstet Mex]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>81</volume>
<page-range>530-40</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<label>14</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ganatra]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Faundes]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Role of birth spacing, family planning services, safe abortionservices and post-abortion care in reducing maternal mortality]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<volume>36</volume>
<page-range>145-55</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<label>15</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Keefe-Oates]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Makleff]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sa]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Forero]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[LJ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mendoza]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Olaya]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MA]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Experiences with abortion counselling in Mexico City and Colombia: addressing women's fears and concerns]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Cult Health Sex]]></source>
<year>2019</year>
<volume>25</volume>
<page-range>1-16</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
