<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0188-6649</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Tópicos (México)]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Tópicos (México)]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0188-6649</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidad Panamericana, Facultad de Filosofía]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0188-66492026000100165</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21555/top.v740.3092</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Los sentidos del bien supremo y su complementariedad en la filosofía crítica de Kant]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The Senses of the Highest Good and Their Complementarity in Kant&#8217;s Critical Philosophy]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Caballero-López]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Daniel]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aaf"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad Nacional Rosario Castellanos  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>Mexico</country>
</aff>
<aff id="Af2">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad Autónoma de la Ciudad de México  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>Mexico</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>04</month>
<year>2026</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>04</month>
<year>2026</year>
</pub-date>
<numero>74</numero>
<fpage>165</fpage>
<lpage>197</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0188-66492026000100165&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0188-66492026000100165&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0188-66492026000100165&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Resumen El presente artículo tiene como objetivo demostrar que la noción de &#8220;bien supremo&#8221;, en la filosofía crítica de Kant, posee dos sentidos distintos pero complementarios, a saber, el práctico, cuya realización solo puede ocurrir en un mundo suprasensible -es decir, el sentido trascendente-, y el sentido arquitectónico, que exige realizarse en el mundo sensible o naturaleza -es decir, el sentido inmanente-. Así, contra las interpretaciones contemporáneas que sostienen la disyunción exclusiva de ambos sentidos, nosotros demostramos su carácter inclusivo. Para ello, esclarecemos los marcos que permiten comprender cada uno de los sentidos y, posteriormente, demostramos su complementariedad por cuanto ambos se condicionan mutuamente: el práctico es condición de validez del arquitectónico, mientras este es condición teleológica del práctico según las exigencias sistémicas de la filosofía kantiana.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Abstract This article aims to demonstrate that the idea of the high- est good, in the critical philosophy of Kant, has two distinct but complementary senses, namely, the practical one, the realization of which can only take place in a supersensible world-i.e., the transcendent sense-and the architectonical one, which must be realized in the sensible world or nature-i.e., the immanent sense. Thus, against the current interpretations that maintain the exclusive disjunction between both senses, we argue in favor of their inclusive character. To this end, we clarify the framework that enables us to understand each of the senses. We then demonstrate their complementarity insofar as both are mutually conditioned: the practical sense conditions the validity of the architectonical one, but the latter functions as the teleological condition of the former according to the systematic demands of Kant&#8217;s philosophy.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[bien supremo]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[ley moral]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[filosofía práctica]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[arquitectónica]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[moral]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[fin final]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[naturaleza]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[metafísica]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[razón]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Kant]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[highest good]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[moral law]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[practical philosophy]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[architectonic]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[morality]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[final end]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[nature]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[metaphysics]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[reason]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Kant]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Allison]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H. E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Kant&#8217;s Practical Justification of Freedom]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Allison]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H. E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Essays on Kant]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<page-range>110-23</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[Oxford University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ameriks]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The End of Kant&#8217;s Critiques: Kant&#8217;s Moral &#8216;Creationism&#8217;]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Muchnik]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Rethinking Kant]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<volume>1</volume>
<page-range>165-90</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[Cambridge Scholars Publishing]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Andaluz Romanillos]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A. M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[La síntesis de naturaleza y libertad como objetos de la razón práctica en Kant]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Cuadernos Salmantinos de Filosofía]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<volume>29</volume>
<page-range>115-54</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Basaglia]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Highest Good and the Notion of the Good as Object of Pure Practical Rason]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Höwing]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The Highest Good in Kant&#8217;s Philosophy]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<page-range>17-32</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[De Gruyter]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Beiser]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Moral Faith and the Highest Good]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Guyer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The Cambridge Companion to Kant and Modern Philosophy]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<page-range>588-629</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[Cambridge University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bennigton]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Kant on the Frontier: Philosophy, Politics, and the Ends of Earth]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Fordham University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bilbeny]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[La esperanza moral en Kant]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rodríguez Aramayo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vilar]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[En la cumbre del criticismo. Simposio sobre la Crítica del juicio de Kant]]></source>
<year>1992</year>
<page-range>28-45</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[Anthropos]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bojanowski]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Kant über das Prinzip der Einheit von theoretischer und praktischer Philosophie (Einletiung I-V)]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Höffe]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[O.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Immanuel Kant. Kritik der Urteilskraft]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<page-range>23-40</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[Akademie Verlag]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bowman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Una deducción del concepto de sumo bien kantiano]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Signos filosóficos]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>15</volume>
<numero>29</numero>
<issue>29</issue>
<page-range>195-222</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Byrne]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Kant on God]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Ashgate]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Caballero-López]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[La interpretación arquitectónica del tránsito de la Crítica del juicio como argumento teorético y práctico]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Open Insight]]></source>
<year>2024</year>
<volume>15</volume>
<numero>34</numero>
<issue>34</issue>
<page-range>81-116</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Caimi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Motivos metafísicos en la crítica del juicio teleológico]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sazbón]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Homenaje a Kant]]></source>
<year>1993</year>
<page-range>9-26</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidad de Buenos Aires]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Engstrom]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Determination of the Concept of the Highest Good]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Höwing]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The Highest Good in Kant&#8217;s Philosophy]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<page-range>89-108</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[De Gruyter]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Esser]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A. M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Applying the Concept of the Good: The Final End and the Highest Good in Kant&#8217;s Third Critique]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Höwing]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The Highest Good in Kant&#8217;s Philosophy]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<page-range>245-62</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[De Gruyter]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fonnesu]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Highest Good and its Crisis in Kant&#8217;s Thought]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Transcendental Philosophy]]></source>
<year>2022</year>
<volume>3</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>369-84</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fugate]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C. D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Highest Good and Kant&#8217;s Proof(s) of God&#8217;s Existence]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[History of Philosophy Quarterly]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>31</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>137-58</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fugate]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C. D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The Teleology of Reason: A Study of the Structure of Kant&#8217;s Critical Philosophy]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[De Gruyter]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fugate]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C. D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Problems with the Highest Good]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Transcendental Philosophy]]></source>
<year>2022</year>
<volume>3</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>385-404</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gómez Caffarena]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[La Crítica del juicio a sólo dos años de la Crítica de la razón práctica]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rodríguez Aramayo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vilar]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[En la cumbre del criticismo. Simposio sobre la Crítica del juicio de Kant]]></source>
<year>1992</year>
<page-range>13-27</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[Anthropos]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Guyer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[From Nature to Morality: Kant&#8217;s New Argument in the &#8216;Critique of Teleological Judgment&#8217;]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Guyer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Kant&#8217;s System of Nature and Freedom: Selected Essays]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<page-range>314-43</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[Oxford University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Guyer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Unity of Nature and Freedom: Kant&#8217;s Conception of the System of Philosophy]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Guyer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Kant&#8217;s System of Nature and Freedom: Selected Essays]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<page-range>277-312</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[Oxford University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Guyer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Bridging the Gulf: Kant&#8217;s Project in the Third Critique]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bird]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[A Companion to Kant]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<page-range>423-40</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[Blackwell]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hernández]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Estudio introductorio: Immanuel Kant, la moral y la estética de la razón]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kant]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Kant II]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<page-range>XI-XCVIII</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[Gredos]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hutter]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Das Interesse der Vernunft. Kants ursprüngliche Einsicht und ihre Entfaltung in den transzendentalphilosopischen Hauptwerken]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Felix Meiner Verlag]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kant]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Martínez Marzoa]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[La religión dentro de los límites de la mera razón]]></source>
<year>1981</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Alianza Editorial]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kant]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Förster]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rosen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Opus postumum]]></source>
<year>1988</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Cambridge University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kant]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[On the Miscarriage of all Philosophical Trials in Theodicy]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kant]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wood]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A. W.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Religion and Rational Theology]]></source>
<year>1996</year>
<page-range>19-38</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[Cambridge University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kant]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[What Does it Mean to Orient Oneself in Thinking?]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kant]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wood]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A. W.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Religion and Rational Theology]]></source>
<year>1996</year>
<page-range>1-18</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[Cambridge University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kant]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zweig]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Correspondence]]></source>
<year>1999</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Cambridge University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kant]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[On a Recently Prominent Tone of Superiority in Philosophy]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kant]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Allison]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Heath]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Theoretical Philosophy after 1781]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<page-range>425-46</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[Cambridge University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kant]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Proclamation of the Imminent Conclusion of a Treaty of Perpetual Peace in Philosophy]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kant]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Allison]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Heath]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Theoretical Philosophy after 1781]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<page-range>451-60</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[Cambridge University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kant]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Aramayo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R. R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mas]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Crítica del discernimiento]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Antonio Machado Libros]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kant]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[On the Use of Teleological Principles in Philosophy]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kant]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zöller]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Louden]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R. B.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zöller]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Anthropology, History and Education]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Cambridge University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kant]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Granja Castro]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D. M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Crítica de la razón práctica]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[FCE]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kant]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Caimi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Crítica de la razón pura]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[FCE]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kant]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Caimi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Los progresos de la metafísica]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[FCE]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kant]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Idea para una historia universal en clave cosmopolita]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kant]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rodríguez Aramayo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Kant III]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<page-range>327-44</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[Gredos]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kant]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sánchez Madrid]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Primera introducción de la Crítica del juicio]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Escolar y Mayo Editores]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kleingeld]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Kant on &#8216;Good&#8217;, the Good, and the Duty to Promote the Highest Good]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Höwing]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The Highest Good in Kant&#8217;s Philosophy]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<page-range>33-50</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[De Gruyter]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lebrun]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Kant y el final de la metafísica]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[García Mayo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Ensayo sobre la Crítica del juicio]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Escolar y Mayo Editores]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lerussi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N. A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Los dos modelos de enlace entre la teoría y la práctica según la Introducción a la Crítica de la facultad de juzgar de Immanuel Kant]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Veritas]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<volume>32</volume>
<page-range>79-94</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.-H.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Ambiguity of Kant&#8217;s Concept of the Highest Good: Finding the Correct Interpretation]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[The Philosophical Forum]]></source>
<year>2019</year>
<volume>50</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>355-82</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mariña]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Making Sense of Kant&#8217;s Highest Good]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Kant-Studien]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<volume>91</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>329-55</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Martínez Marzoa]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Desconocida raíz común]]></source>
<year>1987</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Antonio Machado Libros]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B45">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Marwede]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Kant on Happiness and the Duty to Promote the Highest Good]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Höwing]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The Highest Good in Kant&#8217;s Philosophy]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<page-range>51-70</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[De Gruyter]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B46">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Molina Cantó]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E. A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Natura materialiter spectata. Naturaleza, finalidad y organismo en la Crítica de la facultad de juzgar de Kant]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Revista de Filosofía]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<volume>65</volume>
<page-range>43-56</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B47">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pasternack]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L. R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Kant on Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason: An Interpretation and Defense]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Routledge]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B48">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Piché]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[La phénoménologie de l&#8217;expérience morale chez Kant]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Kairós]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<volume>22</volume>
<page-range>123-50</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B49">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pöltner]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[El concepto de &#8220;conformidad a fines&#8221; en la crítica del juicio estético]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Innerarity]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Anuario Filosófico]]></source>
<year>1990</year>
<volume>23</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>99-112</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B50">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Reath]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Two Conceptions of the Highest Good in Kant]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of the History of Philosophy]]></source>
<year>1988</year>
<volume>26</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>593-619</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B51">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Renaut]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Introduction]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kant]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Renaut]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Critique de la faculté de juger]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<page-range>7-82</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[G. F. Flammarion]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B52">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rodríguez Aramayo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[El diálogo de Kant con Spinoza y Rousseau: una lectura inmanente del papel asignado a Dios]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Alegría]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Órdenes]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Kant y los retos práctico-morales de la actualidad]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<page-range>75-91</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[Tecnos]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B53">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Roviello]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.-M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Du Beau comme Symbole de Bien]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Parret]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Kant&#8217;s Ästhetik / Kant&#8217;s Aesthetics / L&#8217;esthétique de Kant]]></source>
<year>1998</year>
<page-range>374-85</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[De Gruyter]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B54">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Silber]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J. R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Kant&#8217;s Conception of the Highest Good as Immanent and Transcendent]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[The Philosophical Review]]></source>
<year>1959</year>
<volume>68</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>469-92</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B55">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Thies]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Was darf ich hoffen? Kant&#8217;s &#8216;dritte Frage&#8217; in seiner dritten Kritik]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kern]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[U.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Was ist und was sein soll. Natur und Freiheit bei Immanuel Kant]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<page-range>301-20</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[De Gruyter]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B56">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tomasi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[God, the Highest Good, and the Rationality of Faith: Reflections in Kant&#8217;s Moral Proof of the Existence of God]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Höwing]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The Highest Good in Kant&#8217;s Philosophy]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<page-range>111-30</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[De Gruyter]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B57">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Velkley]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R. L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Freedom and the End of Reason: On the Moral Foundation of Kant&#8217;s Critical Philosophy]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[The University of Chicago Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B58">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Villarán]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[El sumo bien kantiano: el objeto construido de la ley moral]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Pensamiento. Revista de Investigación e Información Filosófica]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<volume>71</volume>
<numero>268</numero>
<issue>268</issue>
<page-range>827-43</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B59">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zammito]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J. H.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The Genesis of Kant&#8217;s Critique of Judgment]]></source>
<year>1992</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[The University of Chicago Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B60">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zöller]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[&#8216;The supersensible&#8230; in us, above us and after us&#8217;: The Critical Conception of the Highest Good in Kant&#8217;s Practico-Dogmatic Metaphysics]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Höwing]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The Highest Good in Kant&#8217;s Philosophy]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<page-range>263-80</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[De Gruyter]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
