<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0188-6649</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Tópicos (México)]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Tópicos (México)]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0188-6649</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidad Panamericana, Facultad de Filosofía]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0188-66492023000300117</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21555/top.v670.2408</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Heterogeneidad y aplicación en el Esquematismo trascendental de Kant]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Heterogeneity and Application in Kant´s Transcendental Schematism]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lazos]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Efraín]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>Mexico</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<numero>67</numero>
<fpage>117</fpage>
<lpage>153</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0188-66492023000300117&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0188-66492023000300117&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0188-66492023000300117&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Resumen. Este trabajo discute el concepto de &#8220;heterogeneidad&#8221; y el problema de la aplicación en el &#8220;Esquematismo de los conceptos puros&#8221;, el primer capítulo de la Analítica de los principios en la Crítica de la razón pura de Kant. Propone, primero, una distinción entre la tesis de la heterogeneidad como independencia metafísica entre conceptos e intuiciones, por un lado, y la heterogeneidad como falta de homogeneidad en los componentes del juicio, por otro. El trabajo afirma que esta última, y no la primera, genera el problema de la aplicación de las categorías a los fenómenos. Sostiene asimismo que, aunque el concepto de &#8220;aplicación&#8221; está presente en el problema de la validez objetiva de las categorías en la Deducción trascendental, la aplicación solo aparece como problema en el capítulo del Esquematismo. Sobre esta base, y en contraste con las lecturas &#8220;continuistas&#8221; predominantes que toman al Esquematismo como una parte de la problemática de la Deducción, este trabajo propone además que el Esquematismo representa un nuevo problema en el programa de Kant. Aunque afín a la lectura &#8220;discontinuista&#8221; de Mario Caimi (2015 y 2017), esta propuesta difiere de ella en un punto vital: cómo entender la distinción entre los esquemas trascendentales y los esquemas de los conceptos empíricos y de los matemáticos. Según nuestra propuesta, la heterogeneidad como falta de homogeneidad surge solo para la aplicación de las categorías a los fenómenos, pero no para los conceptos empíricos y los matemáticos, así que los esquemas de los dos últimos no tienen un papel mediador. Finalmente, el trabajo sostiene que los esquemas matemáticos juegan un rol ejemplar en la solución al problema de la aplicación: Kant toma la idea de &#8220;esquema&#8221; como proceso reglado de su concepción del conocimiento matemático, y en este papel contribuyen a resolver el problema de la aplicación.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Abstract. This paper discusses the concept of heterogeneity and the problem of application in the Schematism of pure concepts, the first chapter of the Analytic of principles in Kant´s Critique of Pure Reason. It puts forward a distinction between the thesis of heterogeneity as metaphysical independence between concepts and intuitions, on the one hand, and heterogeneity as lack of homogeneity in the components of judgment, on the other. The paper claims that the latter, not the former, generates the problem of the application of categories to appearances. It also claims that, although the concept of application is present in the problem of the objective validity of the categories in the Transcendental deduction, application only appears as a problem in the Schematism chapter. On these grounds, and in contrast to those continuist readings which take the Schematism chapter to be a part of the problematic raised in the Deduction, this essay proposes that Schematism represents a new problem in Kant´s program of a critique of pure reason. Although akin to Mario Caimi´s &#8220;discontinuist&#8221; reading of Schematism (2015 and 2017), my proposal differs from it in one vital point, namely, on how to understand the distinction between transcendental schemata and schemata of empirical concepts. According to my proposal, heterogeneity as lack of homogeneity arises only for the application of categories to appearances, but not for empirical and mathematical concepts, so the role of schemata for these is not as a mediator between concepts and their objects. Finally, the paper argues for a central, exemplary role for mathematical schemata in the solution to the application problem. Kant takes the idea of schemata as ruled processes from his view of mathematical cognition, and it is precisely in this role that transcendental schemata are meant to solve the application problem.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[subsunción]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[aplicación]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[predicados]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[proceso]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[esquemas matemáticos]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[subsumption]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[application]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[predicates]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[process]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[mathematical schemata]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Arenas]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[El esquematismo de los conceptos matemáticos: una interpretación]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Éndoxa]]></source>
<year>1998</year>
<volume>8</volume>
<page-range>111-36</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Arias Albisu]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Una relación de homogeneidad entre términos heterogéneos. El concepto de homogeneidad en el capítulo del esquematismo en la Crítica de la razón pura]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Diánoia]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<volume>54</volume>
<numero>63</numero>
<issue>63</issue>
<page-range>71-88</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Arias Albisu]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Los esquemas trascendentales como procedimientos y productos]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Revista de Filosofía]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<volume>35</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>27-42</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Aristóteles]]></surname>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Acerca de la memoria y la reminiscencia]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pajares]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.B.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Acerca de la generación y la corrupción. Tratados breves de historia natutal]]></source>
<year>1987</year>
<page-range>233-56</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[Gredos]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Armstrong]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[A Theory of Universals: Universals and Scientific Realism]]></source>
<year>1978</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Cambridge University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Berkeley]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge]]></source>
<year>1957</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[The Library of Liberal Arts]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Caimi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Der Teller, die Rundung, das Schema. Kant über den Begriff der Gleichartigkeit]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fonfara]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Metaphysik als Wissenschaft. Festschrift für Klaus Düsing]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<page-range>211-20</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[Alber]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Caimi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Der Schematismus der reinen Verstandesberiffe]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Enskat]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Kants Theorie der Erfahrung]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<page-range>211-37</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[De Gruyter]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Caimi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[El esquematismo de los conceptos empíricos]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hoyos]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.E.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Stepanenko]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[La &#8220;Crítica de la razón pura&#8221;: una antología hispanoamericana]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<page-range>175-90</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[UNC-UNAM]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Carson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Kant on Intuition in Geometry]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Canadian Journal of Philosophy]]></source>
<year>1997</year>
<volume>27</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>489-512</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Carson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Kant on the Method of Mathematics]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of the History of Philosophy]]></source>
<year>1999</year>
<volume>37</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>629-52</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Detel]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Zur Funktion des Schematismuskapitels in Kants Kritik der reinen Vernunft]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Kant-Studien]]></source>
<year>1978</year>
<volume>69</volume>
<numero>1-4</numero>
<issue>1-4</issue>
<page-range>17-45</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Guyer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Kant and the Claims of Knowledge]]></source>
<year>1987</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Cambridge University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Guyer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[What Does the Transcedental Deduction Prove? And When Does It Prove It? Henry Allison on Kant´S Transcendental Deduction]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Kant-Studien]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<volume>108</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>589-600</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Horstmann]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.-P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Kant and the Power of Judgment]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Cambridge University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kant]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Gesammelte Schriften. Band XII. Briefwechsel. 1795-1803, Anhang]]></source>
<year>1922</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Herausgegeben von der Königlich Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. De Gruyter]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kant]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Gesammelte Schriften. Band IX. Logik. Physische Geographie, Pädagogik. [Jäsche Logik]]]></source>
<year>1923</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Herausgegeben von der Königlich Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. De Gruyter]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kant]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Gesammelte Schriften. Band XVIII. Handschriftlicher Nachlaß. Metaphysik. Zweiter Teil]]></source>
<year>1928</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Herausgegeben von der Königlich Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. De Gruyter]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kant]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Gesammelte Schriften. Band XXIV. Vorlesungen über Logik]]></source>
<year>1966</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Herausgegeben von der Königlich Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. De Gruyter]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kant]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Gesammelte Schriften. Band III. Kritik der reinen Vernunft. (2. Auflage 1787)]]></source>
<year>1968</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Herausgegeben von der Königlich Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. De Gruyter]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kant]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Gesammelte Schriften. Band IV. Kritik der reinen Vernunft. (1. Auflage 1781). Prolegomena. Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten. Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Naturwissenschaft]]></source>
<year>1968</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Herausgegeben von der Königlich Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. De Gruyter]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kant]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Young]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Lectures on Logic]]></source>
<year>1992</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Cambridge University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kant]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Guyer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wood]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Critique of Pure Reason]]></source>
<year>1997</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Cambridge University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kant]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Caimi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Prolegómenos a toda metafísica futura que haya de poder presentarse como ciencia]]></source>
<year>1999</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Istmo]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kant]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vázquez Lobeiras]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Lógica: un manual de lecciones]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Akal]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kant]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Caimi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Crítica de la razón pura]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Fondo de Cultura Económica]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Land]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Nonconceptualist Readings of Kant and the Transcendental Deduction]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Kantian Review]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<volume>20</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>25-51</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[La Rocca]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Schematismus und Anwendung]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Kant-Studien]]></source>
<year>1989</year>
<volume>80</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>129-54</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lazos]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Disonancias de la Crítica. Variaciones sobre cuatro temas kantianos]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[UNAM]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lazos]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Heterogeneidad y dependencia sintética. Más sobre Kant y el (anti) conceptualismo]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Praxis Filosófica]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<volume>47</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>47-69</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lazos]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Reply to Valdez]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Critique. Discussing New Books on Kant, German Idealism, &amp; Beyond]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lazos]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Unidad del espacio, mereología y geometría desde la Estética Trascendental]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Revista de Estudios Kantianos]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<volume>3</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>46-68</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Moledo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Función sistemática y naturaleza del Esquematismo trascendental. Ágora]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Papeles de Filosofía]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>30</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>163-85</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Nuzzo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Imaginative Sensibility Understanding, Sensibility and Imagination in the Critique of Pure Reason]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Thompson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Imagination in Kant´s Critical Philosophy]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<page-range>19-48</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[De Gruyter]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Peláez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[El contenido no conceptual y la necesidad del esquematismo]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Tópicos, Revista de Filosofía]]></source>
<year>2021</year>
<volume>60</volume>
<page-range>351-74</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Philolenko]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Lecture du schématisme trascendantal]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Philolenko]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Études kantiennes]]></source>
<year>1982</year>
<page-range>11-32</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[Vrin]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pippin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Schematism of Empirical Concepts]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Kant-Studien]]></source>
<year>1976</year>
<volume>67</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>156-71</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pippin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Kant´s Theory of Form. An Essay on the Critique of Pure Reason]]></source>
<year>1982</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Yale University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rawls]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Two Concepts of Rules]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[The Philosophical Review]]></source>
<year>1951</year>
<volume>64</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>3-31</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Scaglia]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Kant&#8217;s Notion of a Transcendental Schema: The Constitution of Objective Cognition between Epistemology and Psychology]]></source>
<year>2020</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Peter Lang]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Schopenhauer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[[WWV]. Sämtliche Werke. Die Welt als Wille und Vorstellung. I.]]></source>
<year>1968</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Wissenschäftliche Buchgesellschaft]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Schulting]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Current Status of Research on Kant´s Transcendental Deduction]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Revista de Estudios Kantianos]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<volume>1</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>69-88</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Valdez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Edgar Valdez on Efraín Lazos&#8217;s &#8220;Disonancias de la Crítica&#8221;]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Critique. Discussing New Books on Kant, German Idealism, &amp; Beyond]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Watkins]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Kant and the Sciences]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Oxford University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B45">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Young]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Construction, Schematism and Imagination]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Posy]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Kant and the Philosophy of Mathematics]]></source>
<year>1992</year>
<page-range>159-75</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[Kluwer]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
