<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0188-6649</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Tópicos (México)]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Tópicos (México)]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0188-6649</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidad Panamericana, Facultad de Filosofía]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0188-66492018000200275</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21555/top.v0i55.934</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[El sujeto ante la ley. Conciencia de la ley moral y Faktum de la razón en Kant]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The Subject Before the Law Consciousness of the Moral Law and Faktum of Reason in Kant]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[González Vallejos]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Miguel]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Molina Cantó]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Eduardo]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad Católica de Chile  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>Chile</country>
</aff>
<aff id="Af2">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad Alberto Hurtado  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>Chile</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2018</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2018</year>
</pub-date>
<numero>55</numero>
<fpage>275</fpage>
<lpage>297</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0188-66492018000200275&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0188-66492018000200275&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0188-66492018000200275&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Resumen: En este trabajo analizaremos dos aspectos relativos a lo que Kant considera el principio fundamental de la razón práctica. En primer lugar, intentaremos mostrar que el principio práctico fundamental implica necesariamente una suerte de suspensión de todo principio subjetivo de acción, esto es, de la función orientadora propia de las máximas. Este sería un primer momento de negatividad inherente a la conciencia de la ley moral en nosotros. En segundo lugar, trataremos también de mostrar que la conciencia de dicha ley implica el reconocimiento de nuestra inadecuación originaria respecto de ella, y que dicha inadecuación es sentida necesariamente como un peculiar tipo de dolor, sentimiento negativo tan único y originario como es único y originario el hecho de la conciencia de la ley. Este sería un segundo momento de negatividad, relativo esta vez a la propia identidad práctica del agente.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Abstract: In this work, we shall analyze two aspects regarding what Kant considers the fundamental principle of practical reason. First, we shall try to show that the fundamental practical principle necessarily implies a sort of suspension of any subjective principle of action, that is, of the guiding function proper to maxims. This would be a first moment of negativity inherent to the consciousness of the Moral law within us. Secondly, we shall also attempt to show that the consciousness of this law in-volves the recognition of our original inadequacy with respect to it, and that this inadequacy is necessarily felt as a peculiar type of pain, a negative feeling as unique and original as it is unique and original the fact of the law's consciousness. This would be a second moment of negativity, this time related to the agent's own practical identity.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Kant]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Faktum de la razón]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[sentimiento moral]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[imperativo categórico]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Kant]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Faktum of reason]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[moral feeling]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[categorical imperative]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ameriks]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Interpreting Kant's Critiques]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Oxford ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Clarendon Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ameriks]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Is Practical Justification in Kant Ultimately Dogmatic?]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Timmons]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Baiasu]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Kant on Practical Justification]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<page-range>153-75</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Oxford ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Oxford University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Henrich]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Der Begriff der sittlichen Einsicht und Kants Lehre vom Faktum der Vernunft]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Prauss]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Kant. Zur Deutung seiner Theorie von Erkennen und Handeln]]></source>
<year>1973</year>
<page-range>223-54</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Kóln ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Kiepenheuer &amp; Witsch]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kant]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Caimi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Mario]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Crítica de la razón pura]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<edition>2</edition>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Buenos Aires ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Colihue]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kant]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rodríguez Aramayo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Roberto]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Crítica de la razón práctica]]></source>
<year></year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Madrid ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Alianza]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kant]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Oyarzún]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Crítica de la facultad de juzgar]]></source>
<year>1992</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Caracas ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Monte Ávila]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kant]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Gesammelte Schriften]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Hrsg.: Bd. 1-22 Preussische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Bd. 23 Deutsche Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, ab Bd. 24 Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Góttingen]]></source>
<year>1900</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Berlin ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kleingeld]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Moral Consciousness and the 'Fact of Reason']]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Reath]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Timmermann]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Kant's Critique of Practical Reason: A Critical Guide]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<page-range>55-72</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Cambridge ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Cambridge University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Korsgaard]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Self-Constitution]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Oxford ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[OUP]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Korsgaard]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The Sources of Normativity]]></source>
<year>1996</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Cambridge ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Cambridge University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Korsgaard]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Creating the Kingdom of Ends]]></source>
<year>1996</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Cambridge ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[O'Neill]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[O.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Autonomy and the Fact of Reason in the Kritik der praktischen Vernunft]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hóffe]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[O.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Immanuel Kant, Kritik der praktischen Vernunft]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<page-range>81-97</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Berlin ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Akademie Verlag]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Schónecker]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Das gefühlte Faktum der Vernunft. Skizze einer Interpretation und Verteidigung]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>61</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>91-107</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Schónecker]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Kant's Moral Intuitionism: The Fact of Reason and Moral Predispositions]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Kant Studies Online]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<page-range>1-38</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sussman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[From Deduction to Deed: Kant's Grounding of the Moral Law]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Kantian Review]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<volume>13</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>52-81</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Willaschek]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Die Tat der Vernunft. Zur Bedeutung der Kantischen These vom 'Faktum der Vernunft']]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Funke]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Akten des Siebten Internationalen Kant-Kongresses]]></source>
<year>1991</year>
<page-range>455-66</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Bonn ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Bouvier]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wolff]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Warum das Faktum der Vernunft ein Faktum ist. Auflósung einiger Verstándnisschwierigkeiten in Kants Grundlegung der Moral]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<volume>57</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>511-49</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
