<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0188-6649</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Tópicos (México)]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Tópicos (México)]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0188-6649</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidad Panamericana, Facultad de Filosofía]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0188-66492018000100085</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21555/top.v0i54.865</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Da gênese do sensível a partir do inteligível]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[On the Genesis of the Sensible from the Intelligible]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[De la génesis de lo sensible a partir de lo inteligible]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gaspar]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Francisco Prata]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidade Federal de São Carlos  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>Brazil</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2018</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2018</year>
</pub-date>
<numero>54</numero>
<fpage>85</fpage>
<lpage>115</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0188-66492018000100085&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0188-66492018000100085&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0188-66492018000100085&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="pt"><p><![CDATA[Resumo É conhecida a crítica de Schelling à doutrina da ciência de Fichte, de que ela teria aniquilado todo e qualquer conceito de uma natureza viva, reduzindo esta a um mero obstáculo a ser superado para que se realizem os fins morais da razão. Será mesmo, contudo, que Schelling tem razão? Este artigo pretende refutar essa crítica schellinguiana, mostrando como a doutrina da dênda não só não padece dessa carênda, como antes ela deduz a partir da própria estrutura da razão os domínios do saber, incluindo aí, evidentemente, o domínio da natureza. Essa dedução dos domínios do saber, natureza e espírito, se dará a partir da análise da estrutura de passagem do Absoluto para o saber fatico, isto é, da reflexão sobre si do eu, sobretudo a partir da consideração de seus elementos kantianos: a espontaneidade prática e seu caráter eminentemente reflexionante, algo que não foi percebido por Schelling e seus seguidores.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Abstract It is well known Schelling's critique of Fichte's doctrine of science, to wit, that it would have annihilated every concept of a living nature, reducing it to a mere obstacle to be overcome for the realization of moral ends of reason. However, is Schelling right? This paper aims to refute Schelling's critique, showing not only how the doctrine of science does not suffer from this deficiency, but also that instead it deducts from the structure of the reason the domains of knowledge, including, of course, the domain of nature. This deduction of the domains of knowledge, nature and spirit, will be made through the analysis of the passage-structure from Absolut to the factual knowledge, that is, the I's reflection on himself, especially through the consideration of its Kantian elements: the practical spontaneity and its eminently reflective character, something that was not realized by Schelling and his followers.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Resumen Es conocida la crítica de Schelling de que la doctrina de la ciencia habría aniquilado cualquier concepto de naturaleza viva, reduciéndola a un simple obstáculo que debía ser superado con miras a la realización de los fines morales de la razón. ¿Acaso tiene razón Schelling después de todo? Este artículo pretende refutar esta crítica schellinguiana, mostrando no solo que a la doctrina de la ciencia no se le puede imputar esta falta, sino que ésta deduce, a partir de una estructura propia de la razón, los dominios del saber, del saber fáctico, esto es, de la reflexión sobre sí mismo del yo, sobre todo a partir de la consideración de sus elementos kantianos: Una espontaneidad práctica y su carácter eminentemente reflexionante, algo que no fue entendido por Schelling y sus seguidores.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[doutrina da ciencia]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[natureza]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[reflexão]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[espontaneidade prática]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[juízo reflexionante]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[doctrine of science]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[nature]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[reflexion]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[practical spontaneity]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[reflective judgement]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Doctrina de la ciencia]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[naturaleza]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[reflexión]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[espontaneidad práctica]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[juicio reflexionante]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cecchinato]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Fichte und das Problem einer]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Ästhetik. Würzburg ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Ergon]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fichte]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J. G]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[WL 1804 IP Vortrag]]></source>
<year>1986</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Hamburg ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Felix Meiner]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fichte]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J. G]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rodrigues Torres Filho]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[A doutrina-da-ciência de 1794 e outros escritos]]></source>
<year>1984</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[São Paulo ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Abril Cultural]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fichte]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J. G]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lauth]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Gesamtausgabe der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften]]></source>
<year>1962</year>
<volume>42</volume>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Stuttgart ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[frommann]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gaspar]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Fichte e Schelling em confronto - filosofia da reflexão ou não?]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Dois Pontos]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<volume>12</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>79-97</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Görland]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Die Entwicklung der Frühphilosophie Schellings in der Auseinandersetzung mit Fichte]]></source>
<year>1973</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Frankfurt am Main ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Klostermann]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Guéroult]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[L'évolution et la Structure de la Doctrine de la Sciense chez Fichte]]></source>
<year>1930</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Strasbourg ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Les Belles Lettres]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hegel]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.W.F]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Differenz des Fichte'schen und Schelling'schen Systems der Philosophie]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Hauptwerke in sechs Bänden]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Hamburg ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Felix Meiner]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hühn]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Fichte und Schelling oder: Über die Grenze menschlichen Wissens]]></source>
<year>1992</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Stuttgart ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Metzler]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kant]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Kritik der reinen Vernunft]]></source>
<year>1974</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Frankfurt a. M ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Suhrkamp]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kant]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Kants Gesammelte Schriften: herausgegeben von der Deutschen Akademie der Wissehschaften]]></source>
<year>1902</year>
<volume>29</volume>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Berlin ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Felix Meiner]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lauth]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Die Entstehung von Schellings Identiätsphilosophie in der Auseinandersetzung mit Fichtes Wissenschaftslehre (1795-1801)]]></source>
<year>1975</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Freiburg und München ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Alber]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lauth]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Zur Idee der Transzendentalphilosophie]]></source>
<year>1965</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[München und Salzburg ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Anton Pustet]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Metz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Kategoriendeduktion und produktive Einbildungskraft - in der theoretischen Philosophie Kants und Fichtes]]></source>
<year>1991</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Stuttgart ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Frommann]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Schelling]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jacobs]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Historisch-kritische Ausgabe]]></source>
<year>1976</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Stuttgart ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[frommann]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Schelling]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Schellings Werke]]></source>
<year>1965</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Munique ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Becksche]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Thomas-Fogiel]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Critique de la Representation - Étude sur Fichte]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Paris ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Vrin]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Traub]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Schellings Einfluss auf die WL 1804. Oder: 'Manche Bücher sind nur zu lange geratene Briefe']]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Fichte Studien]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Amsterdem ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Rodopi]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zöller]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Fichte, Schelling und die Riesenschlacht um das Sein]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Baumann]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[U.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Fichte in Berlin - Spekulative Ansätze einer Philosophie der Praxis]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Hannover ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Wehrhahn]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zöller]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Fichte's Transcendental Philosophy - the Original Duplicity of Intelligence and Will]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Cambridge ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Cambridge University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
