<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0188-6649</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Tópicos (México)]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Tópicos (México)]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0188-6649</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidad Panamericana, Facultad de Filosofía]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0188-66492005000200053</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21555/top.v29i1.212</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="fr"><![CDATA[Averroès a-t-il inventé une théorie des deux sujets de la pensée?]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Brenet]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Jean Baptiste]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universite Paris X-Nanterre  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>Francia</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>00</month>
<year>2005</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>00</month>
<year>2005</year>
</pub-date>
<numero>29</numero>
<fpage>53</fpage>
<lpage>86</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0188-66492005000200053&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0188-66492005000200053&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0188-66492005000200053&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Resumen De acuerdo con Tomás de Aquino, la filosofía de la mente de Averroes se caracteriza por la doctrina del «doble sujeto», la cual se encuentra en su Gran Comentario al De Anima. Como es bien sabido, Averroes afirma que de los inteligibles en acto o de los inteligibles teoréticos puede decirse que tienen dos sujetos (duo subiecta): el intelecto material y la imagen de la potencia cogitativa, cuya conexión permite a los humanos individuales el pensar. Aquí tratamos de saber si se trata propiamente de una &#8220;teoría&#8221; producida por Averroes. Al analizar todos los textos que tratan de esto, intentamos justificar el uso del término &#8220;subiectum&#8221; aplicado a la imagen y pretendemos mostrar que la expresión &#8220;duo subiecta&#8221;, aunque equívoca desde un punto de vista léxico, es totalmente clara desde el punto de vista conceptual. La doctrina del doble sujeto ciertamente es una tesis de Averroes que es consecuente con la última etapa de su filosofía y su nueva enseñanza sobre el intelecto material, pero no es, contrario a la interpretación de sus oponentes latinos, la doctrina de los dos &#8220;sustratos&#8221;, misma que haría al hombre el segundo lugar del inteligible en acto.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Abstract According to Thomas Aquinas, Averroes's philosophy of mind is characterized by the doctrine of the «double subject», which is found in his Long Commentary on the De anima. As is well-known, Averroes asserts that the intelligibles in act or theoretical intelligibles may be said to have two subjects (duo subiecta): the material intellect and the image of the cogitative power, whose connection allows individual human beings to think. We try here to know if it is properly a &#8220;theory&#8221; produced by Averroes. By analyzing all the texts dealing with it, we both intend to justify the use of the term &#8220;subiectum&#8221; applied to the image and to show that the expression &#8220;duo subiecta&#8221;, equivocal from a lexical point of view, is totally clear from a conceptual one. The doctrine of the double subject is certainly a thesis of Averroes stemming from his latter stage of his philosophy and his new teaching on the material intellect, but it is not, contrary to the interpretation of his Latin opponents, the doctrine of the two &#8220;substrates&#8221;, which would put man in the second place of the intelligible in act.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Averroes]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[dos sujetos]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[sustrato]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[intelecto material]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[inteligible en acto]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[filosofía de la mente]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Averroes]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[two subjects]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[substrate]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[material intellect]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[intelligible in act]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[philosophy of mind]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Aristóteles]]></surname>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Barbotin]]></surname>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[De l&#8217;âme]]></source>
<year>1989</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Paris ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Les Belles Lettres]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Aristóteles]]></surname>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hamlyn]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D. W.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[De anima]]></source>
<year>1993</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Oxford ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Oxford University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Averroes]]></surname>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Crawford]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F. S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Averrois Cordubensis Commentarium Magnum in Aristotelis De Anima Libros]]></source>
<year>1953</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Cambridge ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Mediaeval Academy of America]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Averroes]]></surname>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Libera]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A. de]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[L&#8217;Intelligence et la Pensée. Grand Commentaire du &#8216;De anima&#8217;]]></source>
<year>1998</year>
<volume>III</volume>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Paris ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[GF-Flammarion]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Averroes]]></surname>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Geoffroy]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Steel]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[La béatitude de l&#8217;âme]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Paris ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Vrin]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Averroes]]></surname>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ivry]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A. L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Middle Commentary on Aristotle&#8217;s De Anima]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Provo ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Brigham Young University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Black]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Consciousness and Self-Knowledge in Aquinas&#8217;s Critique of Averroes&#8217; Psychology]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of the History of Philosophy]]></source>
<year>1993</year>
<volume>31</volume>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Blaustein]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Averroes on the Imagination and on the Intellect]]></source>
<year>1985</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Cambridge, MA ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Harvard University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Brenet]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J. B.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Transferts du sujet. La noétique d&#8217;Averroès selon Jean de Jandun]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Paris ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Vrin]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Brenet]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J. B.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Y a-t-il un sujet de la pensée au Moyen Âge? En Oriens-Occidens]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Sciences, mathématiques et philosophie à l&#8217;âge classique]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>109-69</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Davidson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Averroes on the material intellect]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Viator]]></source>
<year>1986</year>
<volume>17</volume>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[De Aquino]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Quaestiones disputatae de anima]]></source>
<year>1934</year>
<volume>24</volume>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Roma ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Commissio Leonina du Cerf]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[De Aquino]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Libera]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A. De]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[L&#8217;unité de l&#8217;intellect contre les Averroistes]]></source>
<year>1994</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Paris ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[GF-Flammarion]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[De Aquino]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Somme contre les Gentilis]]></source>
<year>1999</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Paris ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[GF-Flammarion]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[De Aquino]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[L&#8217;Unité de l&#8217;intellect]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Paris ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Vrin]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[De Brabant]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bazán]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Quaestiones in tertium de anima, de anima intellectiva, de aeternitate mundi]]></source>
<year>1972</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Louvain et Paris ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Publicatioins Universtaires]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[De Libera]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Existe-t-il une noétique averroiste? Note sur la réception latine d&#8217;Averroès aux XIIIe et XIVe siècles]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Niewöhner]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sturlese]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Averroismus im Mittelalter und in der Renaissance]]></source>
<year></year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Zürich ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Spur Verlag]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[De Libera]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Sujet]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cassin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Vocabulaire européen des philosophies]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Paris ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Le Seuil]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dewan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Obiectum. Notes on the invention of a word]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Archives d&#8217;Histoire Doctrinale et Littéraire du Moyen Âge]]></source>
<year>1981</year>
<volume>48</volume>
<page-range>37-96</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kuksewicz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Z.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[De Siger de Brabant à Jacques de Plaisance]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[La théorie de l&#8217;intellect chez les averroistes latins des XIIIe et XIVe siècles]]></source>
<year>1968</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Wrocklaw ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Ossolineum]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Taylor]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R. C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Remarks on Cogitatio in Averroes&#8217; Commentarium Magnum in Aristotelis De Anima Libros]]></source>
<year>1999</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Leyde ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Brill]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
