<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0185-3325</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Salud mental]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Salud Ment]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0185-3325</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0185-33252020000300119</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17711/sm.0185-3325.2020.017</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Structure analysis of subjective well-being]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Análisis de la estructura del bienestar subjetivo]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Daniel-González]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Leopoldo]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Moral de la Rubia]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[José]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Valle de la O]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Adrián]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[García-Cadena]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Cirilo H.]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León Facultad de Psicología ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Monterrey Nuevo León]]></addr-line>
<country>Mexico</country>
</aff>
<aff id="Af2">
<institution><![CDATA[,Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Monterrey ]]></addr-line>
<country>Mexico</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2020</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2020</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>43</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<fpage>119</fpage>
<lpage>127</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0185-33252020000300119&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0185-33252020000300119&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0185-33252020000300119&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Abstract  Introduction There is controversy regarding the structure of subjective well-being (SWB) and the possibility of calculating a SWB total score.  Objective To test and compare five models proposed for the description of SWB.  Method The study was implemented with a cross-sectional, ex-post-facto design using an incidental sampling method. The Positive and Negative Experience Scale and the Satisfaction with Life Scale were applied to a sample composed of 600 students of health sciences from two universities of Nuevo Leon, Mexico. Data were analyzed through a structural equation modeling, using Maximum Likelihood and Corrected-Bias Percentile methods.  Results The bifactor model comprising three specific factors, vis-à-vis the model composed of three correlated factors, had the best data fit (&#916;&#967;2/&#916;df = 8.166 &gt; 5, &#916;NFI = .018, &#916;NNFI = .015, and &#916;CFI = .016 &gt; .01), and all its fit indices were close; however, the specific factor related to positive affect had a poor contribution. Nevertheless, the model composed of three correlated factors had the greatest parsimony (PR = .853, PNFI = .804, PNNFI = .813, PCFI = .819, and PGFI = .706) and its three factors showed convergent validity, discriminant validity, and internal consistency reliability.  Discussion and conclusion The two models with the best properties justify the use of a composite score of SWB based on the scores of positive affect, negative affect, and satisfaction with life, as well as scores for these three specific domains of content. From a psychometric perspective, the model composed of three correlated factors yielded the best result.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Resumen  Introducción Hay una controversia en torno a la estructura del bienestar subjetivo (BS) y la posibilidad de calcular una puntuación total del BS.  Objetivo Contrastar y comparar cinco modelos propuestos para el BS.  Método El diseño del estudio fue ex-post-facto de corte transversal. Se usó un muestreo incidental. La Escala de Experiencias Positivas y Negativas y la Escala de Satisfacción con la Vida se aplicaron a una muestra compuesta por 600 estudiantes de ciencias de la salud de dos universidades de Nuevo León, México. Los datos se analizaron por modelamiento de ecuaciones estructurales, usando Máxima Verosimilitud y Percentiles Corregidos de Sesgo.  Resultados El modelo bifactor de tres factores específicos tuvo, respecto del modelo compuesto por tres factores correlacionados, tuvo el mejor ajuste a los datos (&#916;&#967;2/&#916;df = 8.166 &gt; 5, &#916;NFI = .018, &#916;NNFI = .015 y &#916;CFI = .016 &gt; .01) y todos sus índices de ajuste fueron buenos; no obstante, el factor específico de afecto positivo tuvo una contribución pobre. Sin embargo, el modelo de tres factores correlacionados tuvo la mayor parsimonia (PR = .853, PNFI = .804, PNNFI = .813, PCFI = .819 y PGFI = .706) y sus tres factores mostraron validez convergente, validez discriminante y consistencia interna.  Discusión y conclusión Los dos modelos con mejores propiedades justifican el uso de una puntuación compuesta de BS integrada por afecto positivo, afecto negativo y satisfacción con la vida, así como puntuaciones para estos tres dominios específicos de contenido. Desde la perspectiva psicométrica, el modelo de tres factores correlacionados proporcionó el mejor resultado.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Subjective well-being]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[personal satisfaction]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[affect]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[psychometrics]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[latent class analysis]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[students]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Bienestar subjetivo]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[satisfacción personal]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[afecto]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[psicometría]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[análisis de variables latentes]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[estudiantes]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Busseri]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M. A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Toward a resolution of the tripartite structure of subjective well&#8208;being]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Personality]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<volume>83</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>413-28</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Busseri]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M. A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Examining the structure of subjective well-being through meta-analysis of the associations among positive affect, negative affect, and life satisfaction]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Personality and Individual Differences]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<volume>122</volume>
<page-range>68-71</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Busseri]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M. A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sadava]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[A review of the tripartite structure of subjective well-being: Implications for conceptualization, operationalization, analysis, and synthesis]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Personality and Social Psychology Review]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>15</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>290-314</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Byrne]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B. M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS. Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<edition>3rd Ed</edition>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[New York ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Routledge]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Chen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F. F.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bai]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lee]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J. M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jing]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Y.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Culture and the structure of affect: A bifactor modeling approach]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Happiness Studies]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<volume>17</volume>
<numero>5</numero>
<issue>5</issue>
<page-range>1801-24</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Chen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F. F.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jing]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Y.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hayes]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lee]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Two concepts or two approaches? A bifactor analysis of psychological and subjective well-being]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Happiness Studies]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>14</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>1033-68</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Daniel-González]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Moral de la Rubia]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Valle de la O]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[García-Cadena]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C. H.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Martínez-Martí]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M. L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Validation of the Mexican spanish version of the scale of positive and negative experience in a sample of medical and psychology students]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Psychological Reports]]></source>
<year>2019</year>
<numero>003329411989604</numero>
<issue>003329411989604</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Diener]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Subjective well-being]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Psychological Bulletin]]></source>
<year>1984</year>
<volume>95</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>542</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Diener]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Emmons]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R. A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Larsen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R. J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Griffin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The satisfaction with life scale]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Personality Assessment]]></source>
<year>1985</year>
<volume>49</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>71-5</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Diener]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Heintzelman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S. J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kushlev]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tay]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wirtz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lutes]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L. D.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Oishi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Findings all psychologists should know from the new science on subjective well-being]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Canadian Psychology]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<volume>58</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>87-104</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Diener]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lucas]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R. E.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Oishi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Advances and open questions in the science of subjective well-being]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Collabra: Psychology]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<volume>4</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>15</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Diener]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wirtz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tov]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kim-Prieto]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Choi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Oishi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Biswas-Diener]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[New well-being measures: Short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Social Indicators Research]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<volume>97</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>143-56</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jovanovi&#263;]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[A bifactor model of subjective well-being: A re-examination of the structure of subjective well-being]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Personality and Individual Differences]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<volume>87</volume>
<page-range>45-9</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lapuente]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dominguez-Lara]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Flores-Kanter]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P. E.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Medrano]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L. A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Estructura del bienestar subjetivo mediante análisis bifactor: ¿Unidimensional o multidimensional?]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Avaliação Psicológica]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<volume>17</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>252-9</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Maddux]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J. E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Subjective well- being and life satisfaction: An introduction to conceptions, theories, and measures]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Maddux (Ed)]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J. E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Subjective Well-Being and Life Satisfaction]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<page-range>3-31</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[New York ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Routledge]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Metler]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S. J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Busseri]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M. A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Further evaluation of the tripartite structure of subjective well-being: Evidence from longitudinal and experimental studies]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Personality]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<volume>85</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>192-206</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Moral]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[La escala de afectos positivos y negativos -PANAS- en personas mexicanas casadas de Monterrey]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Interacciones: Revista de Avances en Psicología]]></source>
<year>2019</year>
<volume>5</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>35-50</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Moral]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Revisión de los criterios para validez convergente estimada a través de la Varianza Media Extraída]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Psychologia]]></source>
<year>2019</year>
<volume>13</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>25-41</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Quezada]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Landero]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gonzalez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[A validity and reliability study of the subjective happiness scale in Mexico]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[The Journal of Happiness &amp; Well-Being]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<volume>4</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>90-100</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rahm]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Heise]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Schuldt]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Measuring the frequency of emotions&#8212;validation of the Scale of Positive and Negative Experience -SPANE- in Germany]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Plos One]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<volume>12</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>e0171288</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<source><![CDATA[Bifactor modelling and the evaluation of scale scores]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<page-range>675-707</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rodríguez-Fernández]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Goñi-Grandmontagne]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[La estructura tridimensional del bienestar subjetivo]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Anales de Psicología]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>27</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>327-32</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rush]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hofer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S. M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Differences in within-and between-person factor structure of positive and negative affect: Analysis of two intensive measurement studies using multilevel structural equation modeling]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Psychological Assessment]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>26</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>462-73</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Seib-Pfeifer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L. E.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pugnaghi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Beauducel]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Leue]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[On the replication of factor structures of the positive and negative affect schedule - PANAS]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Personality and Individual Differences]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<volume>107</volume>
<page-range>201-7</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Soper]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D. S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[A-priori sample size calculator for structural equation models]]></source>
<year>2020</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vázquez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Duque]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hervas]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Satisfaction with life scale in a representative sample of spanish adults: Validation and normative data]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[The Spanish Journal of Psychology]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>16</volume>
<page-range>e82</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Watson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Clark]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L. A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tellegen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Personality and Social Psychology]]></source>
<year>1988</year>
<volume>54</volume>
<numero>6</numero>
<issue>6</issue>
<page-range>1063-70</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Westland]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J. C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Lower bounds on sample size in structural equation modeling]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Electronic Commerce Research and Applications]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<volume>9</volume>
<numero>6</numero>
<issue>6</issue>
<page-range>476-87</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
