<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0185-2450</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Diánoia]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Diánoia]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0185-2450</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0185-24502017000100119</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[El rol de la felicidad ajena en la filosofía práctica de Kant]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The Role of the Happiness of Others in Kant&#8217;s Practical Philosophy]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Marey]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Macarena]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Aff">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad de Buenos Aires  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>Argentina</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>00</month>
<year>2017</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>00</month>
<year>2017</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>62</volume>
<numero>78</numero>
<fpage>119</fpage>
<lpage>145</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0185-24502017000100119&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0185-24502017000100119&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0185-24502017000100119&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Resumen: En este trabajo, presento e intento resolver un problema que la oposición de Kant al eudaimonismo podría plantear al segundo deber de virtud. Tras analizarlo, propondré que el deber de la felicidad ajena consigue disolver al menos uno de los obstáculos para alcanzar la felicidad en la Tierra (la felicidad propia empírica anhelada naturalmente por los seres humanos en cuanto seres racionales y finitos). El motivo de esto es que el deber de promover los fines de los demás logra reubicar la felicidad hedónica en el plano de la moralidad, algo que la noción intelectual de felicidad como componente del bien supremo no consigue hacer y en esto consiste el rol que el deber de la felicidad ajena cumple en el sistema ético kantiano.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Abstract: The aim of this paper is to introduce and try to solve a problem Kant&#8217;s opposition to eudemonism could pose to the second duty of virtue. After analysing this problem, I hold that the duty to promote the happiness of others dissolves at least one of the obstacles one faces when striving to achieve one&#8217;s own happiness on Earth, which we naturally desire as finite rational beings. Unlike the intellectual notion of happiness implied by the concept of the highest good, the duty to promote the happiness of others places hedonic happiness within the realm of morality. This is, I propose, the fundamental role the second duty of virtue plays in Kant&#8217;s ethical system.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[eudaimonismo]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[racionalidad finita]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[anhelo natural]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[segundo deber de virtud]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[beneficencia]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[eudemonism]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[finite rationality]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[natural longing]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[second duty of virtue]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[beneficence]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Darwall]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Kantian Practical Reason Defended]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ethics]]></source>
<year>1985</year>
<volume>96</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>89-99</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Düsing]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Das Problem des höchsten Gutes in Kants praktischer Philosophie]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Kant-Studien]]></source>
<year>1971</year>
<numero>62</numero>
<issue>62</issue>
<page-range>5-42</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gauthier]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Unity of Reason: A Subversive Reinterpretation of Kant]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ethics]]></source>
<year>1985</year>
<volume>96</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>74-88</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Horn]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Ch.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Concept of Love in Kant&#8217;s Virtue Ethics]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Betzler]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Kant&#8217;s Ethics of Virtue]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<page-range>147-73</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Berlín ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Walter de Gruyter]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kang]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.Y.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Die allgemeine Glückseligkeit. Zur systematischen Stellung und Funktionen der Glückseligkeit bei Kant]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Berlín ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Walter de Gruyter (Kant-Studien Ergänzungshefte, 184)]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kant]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Gesammelte Schriften]]></source>
<year></year>
<page-range>1900 y ss</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Berlín ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Preußische Akademie der Wissenschaften]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kant]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Kritik der reinen Vernunft]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Gesammelte Schriften]]></source>
<year></year>
<page-range>1-252</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kant]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Gesammelte Schriften]]></source>
<year></year>
<page-range>385-463</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kant]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Kritik der praktischen Vernunft]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Gesammelte Schriften]]></source>
<year></year>
<page-range>1-163</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kant]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Kritik der Urteilskraft]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Gesammelte Schriften]]></source>
<year></year>
<page-range>165-485</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kant]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Über den Gemeinspruch: Das mag in der Theorie richtig sein, taugt aber nichts für die Praxis]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Gesammelte Schriften]]></source>
<year></year>
<page-range>273-314</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kant]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Die Religion innerhalb der Grenzen der bloßen Vernunft]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Gesammelte Schriften]]></source>
<year></year>
<page-range>1-102</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kant]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Die Metaphysik der Sitten]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Gesammelte Schriften]]></source>
<year></year>
<page-range>205-493</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kant]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Reflexionen aus dem Nachlaß: Moral-, Rechts- und Religionsphilosophie]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Gesammelte Schriften]]></source>
<year></year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kant]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Naturrecht Feyerabend. Einleitung. Neue, revidierte Fassung]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Delfosse]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.P.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hinske]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bordoni]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Kant-Index. Band 30: Stellenindex und Konkordanz zum &#8220;Naturrecht Feyerabend&#8221;. Teilband 1: Einleitung des &#8220;Naturrechts Feyerabend&#8221;]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<page-range>1-15</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Stuttgart ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Frommann-Holzboog]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kienzle]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Macht das Sittegesetz unglücklich?]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kern]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[U]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Was ist und was sein soll. Natur und Freiheit bei Immanuel Kant]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<page-range>267-84</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Berlín ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Walter de Gruyter]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mori]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Glück und Autonomie. Die deutsche Debatte über den Eudämonismus zwischen Aufklärung und Idealismus]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Studia Leibnitiana]]></source>
<year>1993</year>
<volume>25</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>27-42</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rivera Castro]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Virtud, felicidad y religión en la filosofía moral de Kant]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[México ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas-UNAM]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
