<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0041-8633</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Boletín mexicano de derecho comparado]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Bol. Mex. Der. Comp.]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0041-8633</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0041-86332023000300277</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22201/iij.24484873e.2023.168.18867</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Los precedentes como batería de argumentos jurídicos. Un ejercicio de desencanto más allá de la analogía y la autoridad]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Precedents as a set of legal arguments. An exercise of disenchantment beyond analogy and authority]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zorzetto]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Silvia]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad de Milán  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>Italy</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>56</volume>
<numero>168</numero>
<fpage>277</fpage>
<lpage>322</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0041-86332023000300277&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0041-86332023000300277&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0041-86332023000300277&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Resumen: El artículo se propone examinar, en el marco de un análisis metajurisprudencial, los usos de los precedentes que van más allá de la mera concepción más estrecha y clásica, es decir, en la que un precedente como ratio decidendi se aplica como base normativa de un caso posterior. El estudio analiza una pluralidad de otros usos jurisprudenciales que están difundidos en muchos ordenamientos jurídicos tanto en el common law como en el civil law. Cada uno de ellos se hace notar en cuanto tiene valor general y muestra algunos aspectos filosóficamente destacados de los derechos vigentes. El estudio muestra, por tanto, que los usos de los precedentes vinculados a la analogía a pari/simili y a fortiori así como al principio de autoridad no son los únicos, y que el vínculo analogía/autoridad y las razones por las que se utilizan los precedentes son contingentes.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Abstract: The article aims to analyse the uses of judicial precedents that go beyond the narrower and classical view, i.e. where a precedent such as the ratio decidendi is used as a normative basis for a later case. The study analyses a variety of other jurisprudential usages that are widespread in many legal systems, both common law and civil law. Each of them proves to be of general value and highlights some philosophically significant aspects of existing legal systems. The study thus shows that the uses of precedent associated with the analogy a pari/ simili and a fortiori and with the principle of authority are not the only ones and that the link between analogy and authority and the reasons for using precedent are contingent.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[precedentes judiciales]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[argumentos jurídicos]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[analogía]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[autoridad]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[case law precedent]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[legal arguments]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[analogy]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[authority]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Alchourron]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Análisis lógico y derecho]]></source>
<year>2021</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Trotta]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Amaya]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Imitation and analogy]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kapein]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Velden]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B. van der]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Analogy and Exemplary Reasoning in Legal Discourse]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<page-range>13-31</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[Amsterdam University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ando]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Exemplum, analogy and precedent in Roman law]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lowrie]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lüdemann]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Between Exemplarity and Singularity]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<page-range>111-22</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[Routledge]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Arias Schreiber Barba]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ortiz Sánchez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Peña Jumpa]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[El lenguaje de los jueces en el Distrito Judicial de Lima Sur: Una investigación exploratoria sobre el lenguaje en procesos judiciales de familia]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Revista de Estudios de la Justicia]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<numero>26</numero>
<issue>26</issue>
<page-range>1-74</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Arriagada Cáceres]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.B.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Las dos caras del precedente vinculante]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Núñez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Á.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Arriagada]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M. B.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hunter]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Teoría y práctica del precedente]]></source>
<year>2021</year>
<page-range>365 ss.</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[Tirant Lo Blanch]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Atienza]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Algunas tesis sobre la analogía en el derecho]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Doxa]]></source>
<year>1985</year>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>223-9</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Atienza]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Las razones del derecho. Teorías de la argumentación jurídica]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[UNAM]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Atienza]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Cómo evaluar las argumentaciones judiciales]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Diánoia]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>56</volume>
<numero>67</numero>
<issue>67</issue>
<page-range>113-34</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Austin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Lectures on jurisprudence]]></source>
<year>1911</year>
<edition>5a. ed.</edition>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[R. Campbell, John Murray]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Balaguer Callejón]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M. L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Interpretación de la Constitución y ordenamiento jurídico]]></source>
<year>2022</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales Agencia Estatal Boletín Oficial del Estado]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Barberis]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Pluralismo argomentativo. Sull&#8217;argomentazione dell&#8217;interpretazione]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Etica &amp; Politica/Ethics &amp; Politics]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bobbio]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Über den Begriff der &#8219;Natur der Sache&#8217;]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Archivio di filosofía]]></source>
<year>1941</year>
<volume>XI</volume>
<page-range>320-36</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bodenheimer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[A Neglected Theory of Legal Reasoning]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal oLegal Education]]></source>
<year>1969</year>
<volume>21</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>373-402</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Briguglio]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Esperienze applicative del rinvio pregiudiziale interpretativo ex art. 363 bis c.p.c. - Terza Puntata]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Rivista Judicium]]></source>
<year>2023</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bulygin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Los jueces ¿crean derecho?]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Isonomía: Revista de Teoría y Filosofía del Derecho]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<numero>18</numero>
<issue>18</issue>
<page-range>6-25</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Canale]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tuzet]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Judicial scorekeeping]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Canale]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tuzet]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The rules of inference, Inferentialism in Law and Philosophy]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<page-range>73-91</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[Egea]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cardozo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The Nature of the Judicial Process]]></source>
<year>1921</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Yale University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Carrió]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Los jueces crean derecho (Examen de una polémica jurídica) (1961)]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Scarpelli]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[U.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Diritto e analisi del linguaggio]]></source>
<year>1976</year>
<page-range>397-406</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Comunità, Milano ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Condello]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Analogica. Il doppio legame tra diritto e analogia]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Giappichelli]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Conte]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.G.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Ricerche in tema d&#8217;interpretazione analogica. Filosofia dell&#8217;ordinamento normativo. Studi 1957-1968]]></source>
<year>1997</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Giappichelli]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cruz Rodríguez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Supremacía judicial: el control constitucional del derecho viviente en Colombia]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Prolegómenos]]></source>
<year>2019</year>
<volume>21</volume>
<numero>42</numero>
<issue>42</issue>
<page-range>111-33</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cummings]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Argument from Authority]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Reasoning and Public Health: New Ways of Coping with Uncertainty]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<page-range>67-92</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dickman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H. J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Conflicts of Precedent]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Virginia Law Review]]></source>
<year>2020</year>
<volume>106</volume>
<numero>6</numero>
<issue>6</issue>
<page-range>1345-93</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Duarte d&#8217;Almeida]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Arguing a fortiori]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[The Modern Law Review]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<volume>80</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>202-37</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Eisenberg]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M. A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Legal Reasoning]]></source>
<year>2022</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Cambridge UP]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Esser]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Grundsatz und Norm in der richterlichen Fortbildung des Privatrechts]]></source>
<year>1956</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Mohr Paul Siebeck]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fabião]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[On A Fortiori Arguments]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Lisbon Public Law Working Paper]]></source>
<year>2023</year>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fernández]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.Á.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[La interpretación conforme con la Constitución en los límites del orden de certeza]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Revista Chilena de Derecho]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<volume>44</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>653-75</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ferracci]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Argumenter a fortiori en droit]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Revue de la Recherche Juridique - Droit prospectif]]></source>
<year>2019</year>
<volume>43</volume>
<numero>173</numero>
<issue>173</issue>
<page-range>1003-38</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Figueroa Mejía]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[La presunción de constitucionalidad de la ley como criterio jurisprudencial. Especial análisis del caso mexicano]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Carpizo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Astudillo Reyes]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C. I.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Constitucionalismo. Dos siglos de su nacimiento en América Latina]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<page-range>237-65</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fonseca Luján]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Calidad de las sentencias en el sistema penal acusatorio en la Ciudad de México]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Estudios Socio-Jurídicos]]></source>
<year>2022</year>
<volume>24</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>1-32</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gennaioli]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Shleifer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Evolution of Common Law]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Political Economy]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<volume>115</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>43-68</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gianformaggio]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Facchi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Faralli]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pitch]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Eguaglianza, donne e diritto]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Il Mulino]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gómora Juárez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Un análisis conceptual del precedente judicial]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[UNAM]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Goodhart]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Ratio Decidendi of a Case]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Modern Law Review]]></source>
<year>1959</year>
<volume>22</volume>
<page-range>117-24</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Guastini]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Discutendo]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Marcial Pons]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Holmes]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[O.W.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The path of the law]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></source>
<year>1897</year>
<numero>10</numero>
<issue>10</issue>
<page-range>457-78</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Horovitz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Ulrich Klug&#8217;s legal logic a critical account]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Logique et Analyse]]></source>
<year>1966</year>
<volume>9</volume>
<numero>33</numero>
<issue>33</issue>
<page-range>78-144</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hurley]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Coherence, hypothetical cases, and precedent]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Oxford Journal of Legal Studies]]></source>
<year>1990</year>
<volume>10</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>221-51</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ibbetson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Authority and precedent]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Godfrey]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Law and Authority in British Legal History, 1200-1900]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<page-range>60-84</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[Cambridge University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jiménez Campo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Interpretación]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Enciclopedia Jurídica Básica]]></source>
<year>1995</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Civitas]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jori]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[I giudici creano diritto?]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Stato, Chiese e pluralismo confessionale]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<page-range>1-24</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kelsen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Is there a specifically &#8216;juristic&#8217; logic?]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hartney]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[General Theory of Norms]]></source>
<year>1991</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Oxford Academic]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kuhlen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[La interpretación conforme a la Constitución de las leyes]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Marcial Pons]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B45">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lamond]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Analogical G.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Reasoning in the Common Law]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Oxford Journal of Legal Studies]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>34</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>567-88</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B46">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Legrand]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The impossibility of &#8216;legal transplants&#8217;]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law]]></source>
<year>1997</year>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>111-24</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B47">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Levi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.H.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[An introduction to legal reasoning]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[UCLR]]></source>
<year>1948</year>
<volume>15</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>501-74</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B48">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lewis]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Precedent and the rule of law]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Oxford Journal of Legal Studies]]></source>
<year>2021</year>
<volume>41</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>873-98</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B49">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Marmor]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Should Like Cases Be Treated Alike? Law in the Age of Pluralism]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Oxford Academic]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B50">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Marraud]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Argumentos a fortiori]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Theoria]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<numero>79</numero>
<issue>79</issue>
<page-range>99-112</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B51">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Marshall]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Trentatré cose che si possono fare con i precedenti]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ragion pratica]]></source>
<year>1996</year>
<numero>6</numero>
<issue>6</issue>
<page-range>29 ss</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B52">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Merrill]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.W.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Originalismm, stare decisis and the promotion of judicial restraint]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[22 Constitution Comment]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<page-range>271-88</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B53">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Miron]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Per argumentum a fortiori]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Klingler]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Parkhomenko]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Y.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Salonidis]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[¿Between the Lines of the Vienna Convention? Canons and Other Principles of Interpretation in Public International Law]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<page-range>197-210</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[Wolters Kluwer]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B54">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Montrose]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The ratio decidendi of a case]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Modern Law Review]]></source>
<year>1957</year>
<volume>20</volume>
<page-range>587-95</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B55">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Muffato]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Resta qualcosa da dire sulla polivocità degli enunciati deontici?]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[D&amp;Q]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<numero>9</numero>
<issue>9</issue>
<page-range>589-623</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B56">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Niblett]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Tracking inconsistent judicial behavior]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[International Review of Law and Economics]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>34</volume>
<page-range>9-20</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B57">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Núñez Vaquero]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Á.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[La relevancia de los hechos para la interpretación y aplicación (analógica) de precedentes]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gascón Abellán]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Núñez Vaquero]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Á.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[La construcción del precedente en el civil law]]></source>
<year>2020</year>
<page-range>81-105</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[Atelier]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B58">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Núñez Vaquero]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Á.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Problemas Abiertos sobre la publicación de los precedentes]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Cuadernos Electrónicos de Filosofía del Derecho]]></source>
<year>2020</year>
<numero>43</numero>
<issue>43</issue>
<page-range>104-29</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B59">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Perelman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Analogy and metaphor in science, poetry and philosophy]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[The New Rhetoric and the Humanities. Synthese Library,]]></source>
<year>1979</year>
<volume>140</volume>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Springer]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B60">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<collab>Permanent Court of International Justice</collab>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Case of the S.S. &#8220;Wimbledon&#8221; United Kingdom, France, Italy et Japan v. Germany)]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[]]></source>
<year>1923</year>
<page-range>29-30</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B61">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pino]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[L&#8217;interpretazione nel diritto]]></source>
<year>2021</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Giappichelli]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B62">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Posner]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[El rol del juez en el Siglo XXI]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Themis. Revista de Derecho]]></source>
<year>2020</year>
<numero>58</numero>
<issue>58</issue>
<page-range>199-211</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B63">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Postema]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[A similibus ad similia: analogical thinking in law]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Edlin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Common Law Theory]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<page-range>102-33</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[Cambridge University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B64">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ratti]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.B.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Some remarks on precedent and analogy]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Materiali per una storia della cultura giuridica]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>221-33</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B65">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Roversi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Legal Metaphoric Artefacts]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Stelmach]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Brozek]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kurek]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The Emergence of Normative Orders]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<page-range>215-80</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[Copernicus Center Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B66">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Roversi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pasqui]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Borghi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Institutional mimesis: An experimental study on the grounding of legal concepts]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Revus]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<numero>32</numero>
<issue>32</issue>
<page-range>73-95</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B67">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sammarco]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Il diritto in movimento. Hans Kelsen e l&#8217;evoluzione degli ordinamenti giuridici]]></source>
<year>2022</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Mimemis]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B68">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Serrano]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[La interpretación conforme a la Constitución]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B69">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sierra Sorockinas]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Un análisis sobre la formación del precedente]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gascón Abellán]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Núñez Vaquero]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Á.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[La construcción del precedente en el civil law]]></source>
<year>2020</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Atelier]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B70">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Stone]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Precedent and Law: Dynamics of Common Law Growth]]></source>
<year>1985</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Butterworths]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B71">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Summers]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Two Types of Substantive Reasons: The Core of a Theory of Common Law Justification]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Cornell Law Review]]></source>
<year>1978</year>
<numero>63</numero>
<issue>63</issue>
<page-range>707-88</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B72">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sunstein]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[On Analogical Reasoning]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></source>
<year>1993</year>
<volume>106</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>741-91</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B73">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tarello]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[L&#8217;interpretazione della legge]]></source>
<year>1980</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Giuffrè]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B74">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Taruffo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Aspetto del precedente giudiziale]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Criminalia. Annuario di scienze penalistiche]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<page-range>37-57</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B75">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tuzet]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Analogía y razonamiento jurídico]]></source>
<year>2022</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Zela]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B76">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vega Reñón]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Tà éndoxa: argumentación y plausibilidad]]></source>
<year>1993</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[UNED]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B77">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Velluzzi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Analogia giuridica e razionalità dell&#8217;ordinamento. Note a margine]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ragion pratica]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>377-86</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B78">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Velluzzi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[L&#8217;analogia &#8220;occultata&#8221; e l&#8217;analogia &#8220;negata&#8221;: spunti giurisprudenziali per l&#8217;analisi del ragionamento analogico]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Persona e amministrazione]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>515-23</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B79">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Velluzzi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[L&#8217;analogia giuridica presa sul serio. Osservazioni su Cass., Sez. Un. Penali, 17.3.2021, n. 10831]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Criminalia]]></source>
<year>2021</year>
<page-range>1-16</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B80">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Velluzzi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Diciotti]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zorzetto]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Filosofia del diritto e ragionamento giuridico]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Giappichelli]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B81">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Villaverde Menéndez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[El control previo de constitucionalidad de las normas con rango de ley. Crónica de un escéptico]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Revista catalana de dret públic]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<numero>49</numero>
<issue>49</issue>
<page-range>20-40</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B82">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Walton]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.N.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Appeal to expert opinion: Arguments from authority]]></source>
<year>1997</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[The Pennsylvania State University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B83">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Watson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Legal Transplants]]></source>
<year>1993</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[University of Georgia Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B84">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wróblewski]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Legal Decision and its Justification]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Logique et Analyse]]></source>
<year>1971</year>
<volume>14</volume>
<numero>53/54</numero>
<issue>53/54</issue>
<page-range>409-19</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B85">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zagrebelsky]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[El derecho dúctil. Ley, derechos, justicia]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<edition>5a. ed.</edition>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Trotta]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B86">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zorzetto]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[La norma speciale. Una nozione ingannevole]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[ETS]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
