<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0041-8633</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Boletín mexicano de derecho comparado]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Bol. Mex. Der. Comp.]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0041-8633</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0041-86332018000300711</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22201/iij.24484873e.2018.153.13654</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[La apelación por errores en la valoración de la prueba en el Código Nacional de Procedimientos Penales]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The Appeal for Errors in the Evaluation of Evidence in the National Code of Criminal Procedures]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dei Vecchi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Diego]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad de Guadalajara  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>Mexico</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2018</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2018</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>51</volume>
<numero>153</numero>
<fpage>711</fpage>
<lpage>738</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0041-86332018000300711&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0041-86332018000300711&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0041-86332018000300711&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Resumen: En el texto se aborda la problemática relativa a la impugnación y revisión en alzada de decisiones judiciales, adoptadas durante el proceso penal, en virtud de potenciales errores en la valoración de la prueba y fijación de las premisas lácticas. En primer lugar, se pone de manifiesto la aparente tensión entre, por una parte, la garantía a doble conforme por medio de un recurso integral y, por la otra, el principio de inmediación, del que se seguiría que el tribunal de juicio es soberano en la valoración de la prueba. A partir de allí, y luego de una reconstrucción del modo en que el razonamiento probatorio ha de plasmarse en la decisión judicial de conformidad con las exigencias de la CPEUM y del CNPP, se demuestra que esa tensión es más aparente que real. Esto permite sostener que la solución del CNPP al excluir las cuestiones concernientes a la valoración de la prueba como posibles agravios a alegar por medio del recurso de apelación es una mala solución. Ello así, sobre todo, en virtud de que pretende ser una solución para un problema en gran medida inexistente.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Abstract: The text addresses the problems related to the challenge and review in court decisions, adopted during the criminal process, by virtue of potential errors in the assessment of the evidence and determination of the factual premises. First of all, the apparent tension between, on the one hand, the guarantee to double conformity by means of an integral remedy and, on the other, the principle of immediacy from which it would follow that the trial court is sovereign in the evaluation of the evidence. From there, and after a reconstruction of the manner in which tie probative reasoning has to be reflected in the judicial decision in accordance with the requirements of the CPEUM and the CNPP, it is demonstrated that this tension is more apparent than real. This makes it possible to say that the solution of the CNPP in excluding the questions concerning the assessment of the evidence as possible grievances to argue through the appeal is a bad solution. This is especially so because it is intended to be a solution to a problem that is largely non-existent.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[decisión judicial]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[apelación]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[prueba]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[inmediación-inferencia]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[judicial decision]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[appeal]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[evidence]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[immediacy-inference]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Aguiló Regla]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Presunciones, verdad y normas procesales]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Isegoría]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<numero>35</numero>
<issue>35</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Alchourrón]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C. E.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bulygin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Introducción a la metodología de las ciencias jurídicas y sociales]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Buenos Aires ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Astrea]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Allen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R. J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Los estándares de prueba y los límites del análisis jurídico]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vázquez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Estándares depruebay prueba científica]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Madrid ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Marcial Pons]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Andrés Ibáñez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Pruebay convicción judicial en el proceso penal]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Buenos Aires ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Hammurabi]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Atienza]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Las razones del derecho: teorías de la argumentación jurídica]]></source>
<year>1993</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Madrid ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Centro de Estudios Constitucionales]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Atienza]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Las razones del derecho: teorías de la argumentación jurídica]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[México ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[UNAM]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bayón Mohino]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J. C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Bulygin y la justificación de las decisiones judiciales: la parte sorprendente]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Moreso]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J. J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Redondo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M. C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Un diálogo con la teoría del derecho de Eugenio Bulygin]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Madrid ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Marcial Pons]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bayón Mohíno]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J. C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Epistemología, moral y prueba de los hechos: hacia un enfoque no benthamiano]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Analisi e diritto]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Binder]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A. M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Introducción al derecho procesal penal]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Buenos Aires ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Ad-Hoc]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cafferata Nores]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J. I.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Proceso penal y derechos humanos]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Buenos Aires ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Del Puerto]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Canale]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Il ragionamento giuridico]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pino]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Filosofia del diritto. Introduzione critica alpensiero giuridico e al diritto positivo (Estratto)]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Torino ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Giappichelli]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Comanducci]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Osservazioni in margine]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Comanducci]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Guastini]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[L'analisi del ragionamento giuridico: materiali and degli studenti]]></source>
<year>1987</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Torino ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[G. Giappichelli]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Comanducci]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[La motivazione in fatto]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ubertis]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[La conoscenza del fatto nel processo penale]]></source>
<year>1992</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Milano ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Giuffrè]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Couture]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E. J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Fundamentos de derecho procesal civil]]></source>
<year>1958</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Buenos Aires ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Depalma]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dei Vecchí]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Acerca de la fuerza de los enunciados probatorios: el salto constitutivo]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Doxa. Cuadernos de Filosofía del Derecho]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<numero>34</numero>
<issue>34</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dei Vecchi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Problemas probatorios perennes]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[México ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Fontamara]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ferrajoli]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Diritto e ragione: teoria delgarantismo penale]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Roma ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Laterza]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ferrer Beltrán]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Está probado que p]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Triolo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Prassi giuridica e controllo di razionalità]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Torino ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[G. Giappichelli]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ferrer Beltrán]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Prueba y verdad en el derecho]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Madrid ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Marcial Pons]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ferrer Beltrán]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Una concepción minimalista y garantista de la presunción de inocencia]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ferrua]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Il giudizio penale: fatto e valore giuridico]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[La prova nel dibattimento penale]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Torino ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[G. Giappichelli]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gascón Abellán]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Los hechos en el derecho: bases argumentales de la prueba]]></source>
<year>1999</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Madrid ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Marcial Pons]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gascón Abellán]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Los hechos en el derecho. Bases argumentales de la prueba]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Madrid ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Marcial Pons]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[González Lagíer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Quaestio facti]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[ensayos sobre prueba, causalidady acción]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Lima ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Palestra]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Guastíní]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Interpretare e argomentare]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Milán ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Giuffrè]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kelsen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Teoría pura del derecho]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[México ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Porrúa]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Laudan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Is Reasonable Doubt Reasonable?]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Legal Theory]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<numero>9</numero>
<issue>9</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Laudan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[La elemental aritmética epistémica del derecho II: los inapropiados recursos de la teoría moral para abordar el derecho penal]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vázquez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Estándares de prueba y prueba científica]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<page-range>119-34</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Madrid ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[São Paulo]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lluch]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[X. A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[La dosis de prueba: entre el common law y el civil law]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Doxa. Cuadernos de Filosofía del Derecho]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<numero>35</numero>
<issue>35</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Maier]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J. B.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Derecho procesal penal. Fundamentos, 1]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Buenos Aires ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Del Puerto]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pérez Barberá]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Casación penal y posibilidad de contol. Alcance del fallo «Casa» y del método alemán invocado por la Corte]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Pensamiento Penaly Criminológico. Revista de Derecho Penal Integrado]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<numero>11</numero>
<issue>11</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pérez Barberá]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bouvier]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Casación, lógica y valoración de la prueba: Un análisis de la argumetación sobre los hechos en las sentencias de los tribunales casatorios]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Pensamiento Penaly Criminológico. Revista de Derecho Penal Integrado]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<numero>9</numero>
<issue>9</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Stein]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Foundations of Evidence law]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Oxford ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Oxford University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tarello]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[L'interpretaziones della legge]]></source>
<year>1980</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Milano ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Giuffrè]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Taruffo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[La semplice verità: ilgiudice e la costruzione dei fatti]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Bari ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Laterza]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Toulmin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Gli usi dell'argomentazione]]></source>
<year>1958</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Torino ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Rosenberg and Sellier]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Twining]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W. L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Rethinking Evidence]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Rethinking Evidence: Exploratory Essays]]></source>
<year>1990</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Cambridge ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Basil Blackwell]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ubertis]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Fatto e valore nel sistema probatorio penale]]></source>
<year>1979</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Milano ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Giuffrè]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wróblewski]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Il modello teorico dell'applicazione della legge]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Rivista Internationale di Filosofia del Diritto]]></source>
<year>1967</year>
<numero>46</numero>
<issue>46</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wróblewski]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Legal Syllogism and Rationality of Judicial Decision]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Rechtstheorie]]></source>
<year>1974</year>
<numero>5</numero>
<issue>5</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wróblewski]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Sentido y hecho en el derecho]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[México ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Distribuciones Fontamara]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
