<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>1665-1324</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Signos filosóficos]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Sig. Fil]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>1665-1324</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, División de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S1665-13242005000100057</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[¿Es legítima la justificación regla-circular de la inducción?]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cíntora Gómez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Armando]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Iztapalapa ]]></addr-line>
<country>Mexico</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2005</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2005</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>7</volume>
<numero>13</numero>
<fpage>57</fpage>
<lpage>71</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S1665-13242005000100057&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S1665-13242005000100057&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S1665-13242005000100057&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Resumen: Se argumenta que la justificación regla-circular de la inducción defendida, entre otros, por David Papineau no es legítima, es decir, no constituye una genuina justificación.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Abstract: It is argued that the rule-circular justification of induction proposed by David Papineau is illegitimate, that is, that it is not a genuine justification.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[inducción]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[regla-circularidad]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[premisa-circularidad]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[circularidad virtuosa]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[circularidad viciosa]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ayer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Alfred J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The Problem of Knowledge]]></source>
<year>1956</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Harmonsdsworth ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Penguin Books]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Black]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Max]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Self-supporting inductive arguments]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[The Journal of Philosophy]]></source>
<year>1958</year>
<numero>55</numero>
<issue>55</issue>
<page-range>718-25</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Boghossian]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Paul]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[How are objective epistemic reasons posible?]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Philosophical Studies]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
<numero>106</numero>
<issue>106</issue>
<page-range>1-40</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bonjour]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Laurence]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[In Defense of Pure Reason]]></source>
<year>1998</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Cambridge ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Cambridge University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cíntora]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Armando]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Critical comments to Miller&#8217;s defence of Bartley's pancritical rationalism]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ludus Vitalis]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<volume>X</volume>
<numero>18</numero>
<issue>18</issue>
<page-range>21-35</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cling]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Andrew]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Justification-affording circular arguments]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Philosophical Studies]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<numero>111</numero>
<issue>111</issue>
<page-range>251-75</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Feyerebend]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Paul]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Contra el método]]></source>
<year>1974</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Barcelona ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Ariel]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Goldman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Alvin H.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Natural selection, justification, and inference to the best explanation]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rescher]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Nicholas]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Evolution, Cognition, and Realism: Studies in Evolutionary Epistemology]]></source>
<year>1990</year>
<page-range>39-46</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Langham ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[University Press of America]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hookway]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Christopher]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Scepticism]]></source>
<year>1990</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Londres ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Routledge]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kitcher]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Philip]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Abusing Science: The Case Against Creationism]]></source>
<year>1982</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Cambridge ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[The MIT Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kuhn]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Thomas]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The Structure of Scientific Revolutions]]></source>
<year>1962</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Chicago ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[The University of Chicago Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Papineau]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[David]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Reality and Representation]]></source>
<year>1987</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Oxford ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Blackwell]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Papineau]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[David]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Reliabilism, induction, and scepticism]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[The Philosophical Quarterly]]></source>
<year>1992</year>
<numero>42</numero>
<issue>42</issue>
<page-range>1-20</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Russell]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Bertrand]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[History of Western Philosophy]]></source>
<year>1945</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Nueva York ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Simon and Schuster]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Salmon]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Wesley C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Inductive inference]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Baumrin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Bernard]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Philosophy of Science: The Delaware Seminar]]></source>
<year>1963</year>
<volume>II</volume>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Nueva York ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Interscience Publishers]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Walton]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Douglas N.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Begging the Question. Circular Reasoning as a Tactic of Argumentation]]></source>
<year>1991</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Nueva York ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Greenwood Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Weintraub]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Ruth]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The naturalistic response to scepticism]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<numero>78</numero>
<issue>78</issue>
<page-range>369-86</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wright]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Crispin]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[On basic logical knowledge]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Philosophical Studies]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
<numero>106</numero>
<issue>106</issue>
<page-range>41-85</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
