<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>2007-7467</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[RIDE. Revista Iberoamericana para la Investigación y el Desarrollo Educativo]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[RIDE. Rev. Iberoam. Investig. Desarro. Educ]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>2007-7467</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Centro de Estudios e Investigaciones para el Desarrollo Docente A.C.]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S2007-74672024000100604</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.23913/ride.v14i28.1779</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Factores de efectividad en equipos de trabajo Seis Sigma: cuestionario validado por juicio de expertos]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Six Sigma Work Team Effectiveness Factors: Questionnaire Validated by Expert Judgment]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Fatores de Efetividade da Equipe de Trabalho Seis Sigma: Questionário Validado por Julgamento de Especialistas]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Álvarez Argüelles]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Mariela]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Poblano-Ojinaga]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Eduardo Rafael]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aaf"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Noriega Morales]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Salvador Anacleto]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rodríguez Medina]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Manuel Arnoldo]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>Mexico</country>
</aff>
<aff id="Af2">
<institution><![CDATA[,Tecnológico Nacional de México Instituto Tecnológico de La Laguna ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>México</country>
</aff>
<aff id="Af3">
<institution><![CDATA[,Tecnológico Nacional de México Instituto Tecnológico de Ciudad Juárez ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>México</country>
</aff>
<aff id="Af4">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>México</country>
</aff>
<aff id="Af5">
<institution><![CDATA[,Tecnológico Nacional de México Instituto Tecnológico de Ciudad Juárez ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>México</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2024</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2024</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>14</volume>
<numero>28</numero>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S2007-74672024000100604&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S2007-74672024000100604&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S2007-74672024000100604&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Resumen Esta investigación presenta el procedimiento para validar un cuestionario/instrumento de medida (IM) por medio de juicio de expertos, el cual fue diseñado a partir de la identificación de factores o criterios a través de una revisión de literatura de forma sistemática. Para ello, se determinaron 54 factores, los cuales que se discriminaron con la aplicación de un metaanálisis que permitió reducirlos a 29. Posteriormente, un grupo de cinco profesionales expertos en equipos de trabajo y Seis Sigma evaluaron el cuestionario a partide de dos criterios: calidad y coherencia. Los resultados de manera empírica muestran que, en una escala del uno al cuatro, al 52.6 % de los ítems se les evaluó con calificación de 4. Luego, a través del análisis estadístico de Friedman se confirmó el desacuerdo para los dos criterios evaluados. En consecuencia, el instrumento de medición fue revisado, mejorado y aplicado a un grupo de cuatro expertos diferentes al primer grupo, por lo que se repitió la prueba de Friedman y en la segunda evaluación se obtuvo un valor de P mayor de 0.05. Por tanto, se concluye que existe acuerdo entre los expertos por los 29 ítems del IM y que este es válido (adecuado), de ahí que se pueda continuar con su aplicación.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Abstract This research presents the validation of a Questionnaire-type Measurement Instrument (MI) through expert judgment, the IM was designed from the identification of criteria or factors through a Systematic Literature Review, determining 54 factors, same as they were discriminated with the application of Meta-Analysis, reducing to 29 factors, applied in the items. Subsequently, a group of five professional experts in Work Teams and Six Sigma evaluated the questionnaire on two criteria: quality and coherence. The empirical results show that, on a scale from one to four, 52.6% of the items were evaluated with a grade of four. Subsequently, through Friedman's statistical analysis, the disagreement was confirmed for the two criteria evaluated; Due to this, the measurement instrument was reviewed, improved and applied to a group of four different experts from the first group, repeating the Friedman test and obtaining a P value greater than 0.05 in the second evaluation, concluding that there is agreement between the experts. the 29 items of the IM and that it is valid (adequate) so that its application can be continued.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="pt"><p><![CDATA[Resumo Esta investigação apresenta a validação de um Instrumento de Medida (IM) do tipo Questionário por meio do julgamento de especialistas, o MI foi concebido a partir da identificação de critérios ou fatores por meio de uma Revisão Sistemática da Literatura, determinando 54 fatores, os quais foram discriminados com a aplicação do Meta -Análise, reduzindo a 29 fatores, aplicados nos itens. Posteriormente, um grupo de cinco profissionais especialistas em Equipes de Trabalho e Seis Sigma avaliou o questionário em dois critérios: qualidade e coerência. Os resultados empíricos mostram que, em uma escala de um a quatro, 52,6% dos itens foram avaliados com nota quatro. Posteriormente, por meio da análise estatística de Friedman, confirmou-se a discordância para os dois critérios avaliados; Devido a isso, o instrumento de medida foi revisado, aprimorado e aplicado a um grupo de quatro especialistas diferentes do primeiro grupo, repetindo o teste de Friedman e obtendo um valor de P maior que 0,05 na segunda avaliação, concluindo que há concordância entre os especialistas. os 29 itens do MI e que é válido (adequado) para que sua aplicação possa ser continuada.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[validación de instrumento de medición]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[juicio de expertos]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[validación de contenido]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[factores]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Seis Sigma]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Measurement Instrument Validation]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Expert Judgment]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Content Validation]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Factors]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Six Sigma]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Validação de Instrumentos de Medição]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Opinião Especializada]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Validação de Conteúdo]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Fatores]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Seis Sigma]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="confpro">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Álvarez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Valles]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Noriega]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Six Sigma Projects Work Teams : A Literature Review of the Factors Influencing Their Effectiveness]]></source>
<year>2021</year>
<conf-name><![CDATA[ Proceedings of the 10th Annual World Conference of the Society for Industrial and Systems Engineering]]></conf-name>
<conf-loc> </conf-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bañuelas]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Antony]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Brace]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[An application of Six Sigma to reduce waste]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Quality and Reliability Engineering International]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<volume>21</volume>
<numero>6</numero>
<issue>6</issue>
<page-range>553-70</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cupani]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Análisis de ecuaciones estructurales: conceptos, etapas de desarrollo y un ejemplo de aplicación]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Revista Tesis]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>1</volume>
<page-range>186-99</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Escobar-Pérez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cuervo-Martínez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Á.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Validez de contenido y juicio de expertos: una aproximación a su utilización]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Avances en Medición]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<volume>6</volume>
<page-range>27-36</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[García Martínez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Poblano-Ojinaga]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E. R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Reyes Valenzuela]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cuamea Cruz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Juárez Rodríguez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Elección de carrera e institución de educación superior: validación de instrumento de medición mediante el modelado de ecuaciones estructurales]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[RIDE Revista Iberoamericana para la Investigación y el Desarrollo Educativo]]></source>
<year>2021</year>
<volume>11</volume>
<numero>22</numero>
<issue>22</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Goh]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T. N.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Xie]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Improving on the six sigma paradigm]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[The TQM Magazine]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<volume>16</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>235-40</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Granato]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[De Araújo Calado]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V. M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jarvis]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Observations on the use of statistical methods in Food Science and Technology]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Food Research International]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>55</volume>
<page-range>137-49</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hair]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J. F.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Anderson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R. E.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tatham]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R. L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Black]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W. C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Análisis multivariante]]></source>
<year>1999</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Hall Iberia]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hernández Sampieri]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fernández Collado]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Baptista Lucio]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Metodolgía de la investigación]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<edition>6</edition>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[McGraw-Hill]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lloréns-Montes]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F. J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Molina]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L. M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Six Sigma and management theory: Processes, content and effectiveness]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Total Quality Management &amp; Business Excellence]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<volume>17</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>485-506</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Malhotra]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N. K.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Investigación de mercados]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Educación]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Investigacion de Mercados]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<volume>3</volume>
<numero>6</numero>
<issue>6</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Milosevic]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Patanakul]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Standardized project management may increase development projects success]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[International Journal of Project Management]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<volume>23</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>181-92</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mondy]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R. W.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Noe]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R. M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Administración de recursos humanos]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Pearson Educacio&#769;n de México S.A. de C.V.]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rodríguez Medina]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M. A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Poblano-Ojinaga]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E. R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Alvarado Tarango]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[González Torres]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rodríguez Borbón]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M. I.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Validación por juicio de expertos de un instrumento de evaluación para evidencias de aprendizaje conceptual]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[RIDE Revista Iberoamericana para la Investigación y el Desarrollo Educativo]]></source>
<year>2021</year>
<volume>11</volume>
<numero>22</numero>
<issue>22</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rodríguez-Medina]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M. A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Poblano-Ojinaga]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E. R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rodríguez-Borbón]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M. I.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Alvarado-Tarango]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[A high impact business strategy: The Six Sigma methodology]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Dyna]]></source>
<year>2021</year>
<volume>96</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Suárez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Díaz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Factores críticos de éxito en la investigación universitaria venezolana]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Valles Chávez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Alvarez Argüelles]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Torres Argüelles]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S. V.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Factores críticos de éxito en el despliegue de proyectos seis sigma: una revisión sistemática y metaanálisis]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pinto]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rodríguez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sohn]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E. y H.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Enfoques y métodos para resolver problemas sociales y productivos de manera sostenible]]></source>
<year>2023</year>
<page-range>69-91</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[Editorial CENID]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
