<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>2007-4387</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Problema anuario de filosofía y teoría del derecho]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Probl. anu. filos. teor. derecho]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>2007-4387</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S2007-43872021000100307</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22201/iij.24487937e.2021.15.16125</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Precedente, analogía y razones para actuar. Comentarios sobre la propuesta de Frederick Schauer]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Precedent, Analogy and Reasons for Action. Comments on the Ideas of Frederick Schauer]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rojas Marroquín]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Abdón Mauricio]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad ICESI Facultad de Derecho y Ciencias Sociales ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>Colombia</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2021</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2021</year>
</pub-date>
<numero>15</numero>
<fpage>307</fpage>
<lpage>342</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S2007-43872021000100307&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S2007-43872021000100307&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S2007-43872021000100307&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Resumen: Para buena parte de la literatura jurídica -con la que estoy particularmente de acuerdo-, el uso y seguimiento de sentencias en casos futuros es prioritariamente un asunto de analogías. Sin embargo, el reconocido profesor Frederick Schauer, en varios de sus textos, ha puesto con buenos argumentos en tela de juicio esta idea. De acuerdo con su interpretación, seguir el precedente es algo sustancialmente distinto al razonamiento analógico. En este artículo se intenta problematizar esta tesis a partir de cuatro diferencias analíticas que considero fundamentales: principios-reglas; intención comunicativa-recurso lingüístico; razones internas-externas, y razones excluyentes-concluyentes. Al interior de cada una de ellas, la tesis de la separación propuesta por Schauer, parecería fracasar.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Abstract: For a large part of the legal literature, with which I am particularly in agreement, the use and follow-up of judicial decisions in future cases is primarily a matter of analogies. However, the well-known professor Frederick Schauer, in several of his studies and publications, has put this idea at risk with good arguments. According to his interpretation, following the precedent is something substantially different from analogical reasoning. In this paper, we try to problematize his thesis from four analytical perspectives that I consider essentials: principles-rules; communicative intentions-linguistic tool; internal-external reason; and excluding-conclusive reasons. Within them, the thesis of separation proposed by Schauer would seem to fails.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Precedente]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[analogía]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[razones para actuar]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[razones excluyentes]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[razones concluyentes]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Precedents]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Analogy]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Reasons for Action]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Exclusionary Reasons]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Conclusive reasons]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bäcker]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Carsten]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Reglas, principios y derrotabilidad]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[DOXA, Cuadernos de Filosofía del Derecho]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<numero>37</numero>
<issue>37</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bayón]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Juan Carlos]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Razones y reglas: sobre el concepto de «razón excluyente» de Joseph Raz]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[DOXA]]></source>
<year>1991</year>
<numero>10</numero>
<issue>10</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bayón]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Juan Carlos]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Sobre la racionalidad de dictar y seguir reglas]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[DOXA]]></source>
<year>1996</year>
<numero>19</numero>
<issue>19</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bouvier]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Hernán]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Reglas y razones subyacentes]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[DOXA]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<numero>27</numero>
<issue>27</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Caracciolo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Ricardo]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[El concepto de autoridad normativa: el modelo de las razones para la acción]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[DOXA]]></source>
<year>1991</year>
<numero>10</numero>
<issue>10</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gómora Juárez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[La ejemplaridad y proyección del precedente]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Problema. Anuario de Filosofía y Teoría del Derecho]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<numero>12</numero>
<issue>12</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Guastini]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Riccardo]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Interpretar y argumentar]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[King]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Patricia]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Internalismo, externalismo y autoconocimiento]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Crítica: Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<numero>96</numero>
<issue>96</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lamond]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Grant]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Precedent and Analogy in Legal Reasoning]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zalta]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Edward N.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Spring]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Nino]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Carlos Santiago]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[La validez del derecho]]></source>
<year>1985</year>
<volume>6</volume>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Buenos Aires ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Astrea]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Nino]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Carlos Santiago]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[El constructivismo ético]]></source>
<year>1989</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Madrid ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Centro de Estudios Constitucionales]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ortíz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Javier]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[¿Puede haber razones jurídicas autoritativas?]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[ISONOMÍA. Revista de Teoría y Filosofía del Derecho]]></source>
<year>1995</year>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Peirce]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Charles Sanders]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[La fijación de la creencia]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Peirce]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Charles S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[El hombre, un signo (El Pragmatismo de Peirce)]]></source>
<year>1988</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Barcelona ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Crítica]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Raz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Joseph]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Authority, Law and Morality]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[The Monist]]></source>
<year>1985</year>
<volume>68</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Raz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Joseph]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Reasons for Action, Decisions and Norms]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Mind]]></source>
<year>1975</year>
<volume>84</volume>
<numero>336</numero>
<issue>336</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Raz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Joseph]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Practical Reasons and Norms]]></source>
<year>1999</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Oxford ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Oxford University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Redondo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[María Cristina]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[¿Razones internas vs. razones externas?]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Isonomía. Revista de Teoría y Filosofía del Derecho]]></source>
<year>1996</year>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Redondo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[María Cristina]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[El carácter práctico de los deberes jurídicos]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[DOXA]]></source>
<year>1998</year>
<numero>21</numero>
<issue>21</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Redondo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[María Cristina]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Navarro]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Pablo Eugenio]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Normas y razonamiento práctico: una crítica a Joseph Raz]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[DOXA]]></source>
<year>1991</year>
<numero>10</numero>
<issue>10</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rodríguez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J. A. S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rivas]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[El último eslabón del positivismo jurídico: Dos estudios sobre Joseph Raz]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Granada ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Comares]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rojas Marroquin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Abdón]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[La fuerza ilocutiva y los efectos perlocutivos en el análisis estático de sentencias judiciales]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Revista de Derecho (Valdivia)]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<volume>30</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rorty]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Richard]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[La indagación intelectual como recontextualización: una explicación antidualista de la interpretación]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Objetividad, relativismo y verdad]]></source>
<year>1996</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Madrid ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Paidós]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Schauer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Frederick]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Precedent]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Stanford Law Review]]></source>
<year>1987</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Schauer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Frederick]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Las reglas en juego]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Madrid ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Marcial Pons]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Schauer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Frederick]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Has Precedent Ever Really Mattered in the Supreme Court]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ga. St. UL Rev.]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<volume>24</volume>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Schauer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Frederick]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Why Precedent in Law (and Elsewhere) is not Totally (or even Substantially) about Analogy]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Perspectives on Psychological Science]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<volume>3</volume>
<numero>6</numero>
<issue>6</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Schauer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Frederick]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The Force of Law]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Harvard University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vega Gómez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Juan]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[El positivismo excluyente de Raz]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Boletín Mexicano de Derecho Comparado]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<volume>XXXVII</volume>
<numero>110</numero>
<issue>110</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Williams]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Bernard]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Internal and External Reasons]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973-1980]]></source>
<year>1981</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Cambridge University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
