<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0300-9041</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Ginecología y obstetricia de México]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Ginecol. obstet. Méx.]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0300-9041</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Federación Mexicana de Colegios de Obstetricia y Ginecología A.C.]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0300-90412019000100004</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.24245/gom.v87i1.2596</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Permanencia del dispositivo intrauterino TCu 380A insertado después de algún procedmiento obstétrico]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Stay of the TCU 380A IUD inserted after of the obstetric event]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Beltrán-Rivera]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Leyra Yesenia]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Moreno-Ruiz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Leonardo Alejandro]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Góngora-Carlín]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Marco Antonio]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fabián-Reyes]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Tania Deyanira]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Facio-Sánchez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Evelyn Asunción]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,Hospital General de Puerto Escondido  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ Oaxaca]]></addr-line>
<country>Mexico</country>
</aff>
<aff id="Af2">
<institution><![CDATA[,Hospital General Dr. Aurelio Valdivieso División de Ginecología y Obstetricia ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Oaxaca Oaxaca]]></addr-line>
<country>Mexico</country>
</aff>
<aff id="Af3">
<institution><![CDATA[,Hospital General Dr. Aurelio Valdivieso División de Ginecología y Obstetricia ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Oaxaca Oaxaca]]></addr-line>
<country>Mexico</country>
</aff>
<aff id="Af4">
<institution><![CDATA[,Hospital General Dr. Aurelio Valdivieso División de Ginecología y Obstetricia ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Oaxaca Oaxaca]]></addr-line>
<country>Mexico</country>
</aff>
<aff id="Af5">
<institution><![CDATA[,Hospital General Dr. Aurelio Valdivieso División de Ginecología y Obstetricia ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Oaxaca Oaxaca]]></addr-line>
<country>Mexico</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>00</month>
<year>2019</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>00</month>
<year>2019</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>87</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<fpage>20</fpage>
<lpage>25</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0300-90412019000100004&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0300-90412019000100004&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0300-90412019000100004&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Resumen  OBJETIVO:  Determinar la permanencia del dispositivo intrauterino TCu 380A insertado después de algún procedimiento obstétrico efectuado a pacientes atendidas en el Hospital General Dr. Aurelio Valdivieso.  MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS:  Estudio transversal y descriptivo efectuado en pacientes que concluyeron el embarazo entre el 1 de octubre de 2016 y el 31 de marzo de 2017, en el Hospital General Dr. Aurelio Valdivieso y que aceptaron se les colocara el dispositivo intrauterino TCu 380A después de algún procedimiento obstétrico y antes de darlas de alta del hospital. Variables de estudio: cantidad de embarazos, terminación de estos, médico responsable de la colocación, técnica y permanencia. El análisis estadístico implementado fue el univariado.  RESULTADOS:  Se incluyeron 182 pacientes con media de edad de 23 años y límites de 14 y 43 años. En el seguimiento de la permanencia del dispositivo 42.3% (n = 77) se encontró in situ, 28.5% (n = 52) en mala posición, y 0.55% (n = 1) lo expulsó.  CONCLUSIONES:  La permanencia del dispositivo intrauterino parece tener una relación estrecha con la forma correcta de insertarlo y, desde luego, con la experiencia acumulada del médico. En las primeras inserciones el médico debe ser supervisado por otro de mayor experiencia o, simplemente, con la vigilancia de los médicos adscritos.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Abstract  OBJECTIVE:  To determine the permanence of the TCu 380A IUD inserted after the obstetric event in the Dr. Aurelio Valdivieso Hospital.  MATERIAL AND METHODS:  Cross-sectional and descriptive study carried out in patients who concluded their pregnancy, between October 1, 2016 and March 31, 2017, at the Dr. Aurelio Valdivieso General Hospital (Oaxaca, Mexico) and who accepted the placement of the TCu 380A intrauterine device during the postpartum period. and before discharge from the hospital. Study variables: number of pregnancies, termination of these, doctor responsible for the placement, technique and permanence. The statistical analysis implemented was univariate.  RESULTS:  The study was conducted in 182 patients with a mean age of 23 years, a minimum of 14 years and a maximum of 43 years. In the monitoring of the permanence of the IUD TCu 380A with 42.31% (77) was found in situ, 28.57% (52) in poor position, and 0.55% (1) was expelled.  CONCLUSIONS:  The permanence of the intrauterine device seems to have a close relationship with the correct way to insert it and, of course, with the accumulated experience of the doctor. In the first insertions the doctor must be supervised by another one of greater experience or, simply, with the surveillance of the assigned doctors.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[DIU posplacenta]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[DIU posparto]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[DIU transcesárea]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[expulsión del dispositivo intrauterino]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Postplacenta IUD]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Postpartum IUD]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Trans Cesarean IUD]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Expulsion of the intrauterine device]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<label>1</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Madden]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Intrauterine contraception: Devices, candidates, and selection]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dean]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Goldberg]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AB]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Up To Date]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<label>2</label><nlm-citation citation-type="">
<collab>National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence</collab>
<source><![CDATA[NICE clinical guideline no 30 2005. Long-acting reversible contraception]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<label>3</label><nlm-citation citation-type="">
<collab>Faculty of Sexual &amp; Reproductive Healthcare</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Intrauterine Contraception]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<label>4</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lara]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Velázquez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Reyes]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Baca]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Dispositivo intrauterino posplacenta Hilos guía no visibles]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ginecol Obstet Mex]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>80</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>201-7</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<label>5</label><nlm-citation citation-type="">
<collab>OMS</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Estrategias para la programación de la planificación familiar postparto]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<label>6</label><nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Martínez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[BM]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Navalón]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[BZ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Labrador]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[BR]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Anticoncepción intrautrerina]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Protocolos SEGO-SEC]]></source>
<year></year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<label>7</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hardeman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Barry]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[DW]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Intrauterine Devices: An Update]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Am Fam Physician]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>89</volume>
<numero>6</numero>
<issue>6</issue>
<page-range>445-50</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Tucson, Arizona ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[University of Arizona]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<label>8</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Veloso]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MD]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lobos]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Control ecográfico post inserción de dispositivo intrauterino]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Revista Chilena de Obstetricia y Ginecología]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>76</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>15-20</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<label>9</label><nlm-citation citation-type="confpro">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Iglesias]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Control ecográfico del dispositivo intrauterino]]></source>
<year>1994</year>
<conf-name><![CDATA[ (Ponencias). V Congreso de la Sociedad Española de Contracepción]]></conf-name>
<conf-loc> </conf-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
