<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0011-1503</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Crítica (México, D.F.)]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Crítica (Méx., D.F.)]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0011-1503</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0011-15032021000200023</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22201/iifs.18704905e.2021.1269</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[La metáfora de la confrontación y los argumentadores razonables]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gascón]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[José Ángel]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad Católica del Maule Departamento de Filosofía ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>Chile</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>00</month>
<year>2021</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>00</month>
<year>2021</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>53</volume>
<numero>158</numero>
<fpage>23</fpage>
<lpage>46</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0011-15032021000200023&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0011-15032021000200023&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0011-15032021000200023&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Resumen Las discusiones argumentativas comúnmente se describen en términos confrontativos, pero no está claro que la argumentación sea necesariamente confrontativa. Aquí argumento que la confrontación no es un elemento esencial de la argumentación y de hecho debe evitarse porque desalienta el comportamiento razonable. La razonabilidad, caracterizada aquí como una disposición a modificar las creencias propias ante buenos argumentos, es puesta en peligro por las metas confrontativas. Eso nos da una razón para rechazar la confrontación en la argumentación, pues la razonabilidad contribuye a algunos de los mayores bienes que la argumentación puede producir.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Summary Argumentative discussions are commonly described in adversarial terms, but it is not obvious that argumentation is necessarily adversarial. Here I argue that adversariality is not an essential element in argumentation and in fact it must be avoided because it discourages reasonable behaviour. Reasonableness, characterised here as willingness to modify one&#8217;s own beliefs in the light of good arguments, is jeopardised by adversarial goals. That gives us a reason to reject adversariality in argumentation, since reasonableness contributes to some of the greatest goods that argumentation can provide.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[argumentación]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[creencia]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[desacuerdo]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[metáforas]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[razonabilidad]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[argumentation]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[belief]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[disagreement]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[metaphors]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[reasonableness]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Aikin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[A Defense of War and Sport Metaphors in Argument]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Philosophy and Rhetoric]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>44</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>250-72</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Brockriede]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Arguers as Lovers]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Philosophy and Rhetoric]]></source>
<year>1972</year>
<volume>5</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>1-11</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Casey]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Adversariality and Argumentation]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Informal Logic]]></source>
<year>2020</year>
<volume>40</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>77-108</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cohen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.H.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Argumentative Virtues as Conduits for Reason&#8217;s Causal Efficacy: Why the Practice of Giving Reasons Requires that We Practice Hearing Reasons]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Topoi]]></source>
<year>2019</year>
<volume>38</volume>
<page-range>711-8</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cohen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.H.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Argument Is War. . . And War Is Hell: Philosophy, Education, and Metaphors for Argumentation]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Informal Logic]]></source>
<year>1995</year>
<volume>17</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>177-88</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Druckman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.N.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Implications of Framing Effects for Citizen Competence]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Political Behavior]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
<volume>23</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>225-56</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Eemeren]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.H. van]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Dordrecht ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Springer]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Eemeren]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.H. van]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Dordrecht ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Springer]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Eemeren]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.H. van]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Grootendorst]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Rationale for A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Argumentation]]></source>
<year>1988</year>
<volume>2</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>271-91</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Govier]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The Philosophy of Argument]]></source>
<year>1999</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Vale Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Harding]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hintikka]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.B.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Discovering Reality: Feminist Perspectives on Epistemology, Metaphysics, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science]]></source>
<year>1983</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Dordrecht ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Kluwer Academic Publishers]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kahneman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Thinking, Fast and Slow]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Nueva York ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Farrar]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kunda]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Z.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Social Cognition: Making Sense of People]]></source>
<year>1999</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Cambridge ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[MIT Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lakoff]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Johnson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Metaphors We Live By]]></source>
<year>1980</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Chicago ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[University of Chicago Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mercier]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Argumentative Theory: Predictions And Empirical Evidence]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Trends in Cognitive Sciences]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<volume>20</volume>
<numero>9</numero>
<issue>9</issue>
<page-range>689-700</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mercier]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sperber]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The Enigma of Reason]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Cambridge ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Harvard University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Moulton]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[A Paradigm of Philosophy: The Adversary Method]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Harding y Hintikka]]></source>
<year>1983</year>
<page-range>149-64</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Niemeyer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Emancipatory Effect of Deliberation: Empirical Lessons from Mini-Public]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Politics &amp; Society]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>39</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>103-40</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Nisbett]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.E.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wilson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Telling More Than We Can Know: Verbal Reports on Mental Processes]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Psychological Review]]></source>
<year>1977</year>
<volume>84</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>231-59</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[O&#8217;Keefe]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Two Concepts of Argument]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[The Journal of the American Forensic Association]]></source>
<year>1977</year>
<volume>13</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>121-8</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Robins]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mayer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Metaphor Framing Effect: Metaphorical Reasoning about Text-Based Dilemmas]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Discourse Processes]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<volume>30</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>57-86</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rooney]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Philosophy, Adversarial Argumentation, and Embattled Reason]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Informal Logic]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<volume>30</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>203-34</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Trouche]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sander]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mercier]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Arguments, More Than Confidence, Explain The Good Performance of Reasoning Groups]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Experimental Psychology: General]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>143</volume>
<numero>5</numero>
<issue>5</issue>
<page-range>1958-71</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
