SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.86 número4Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis as a phenotypic form of the SPG11 gene mutation spectrum. A case report índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Revista médica del Hospital General de México

versión On-line ISSN 2524-177Xversión impresa ISSN 0185-1063

Rev. med. Hosp. Gen. Méx. vol.86 no.4 Ciudad de México oct./dic. 2023  Epub 16-Oct-2023

https://doi.org/10.24875/hgmx.23000003 

Clinical cases

Rehabilitation in post-cardiac transplantation. Experience in Mexico's General Hospital

Miguel Á. Martínez-Camacho1 

Robert A. Jones-Baro1  * 

Andrea Melo-Villalobos1 

Diego Morales-Hernández1 

Monserrat Cruz-Rivero2 

Andrés Ku-González2 

Eduardo Ayala-Hernández3 

José R. Castaño-Guerra3 

1Physiotherapy Service in Critical Areas, Hospital General de México "Dr. Eduardo Liceaga", Mexico City

2Cardiac Rehabilitation Unit, REHADAPTA, Mérida, Yucatán

3Cardiology Service, Hospital General de México "Dr. Eduardo Liceaga", Mexico City. Mexico


Abstract

Post-heart transplant patient care is a challenging task for multidisciplinary teams. Thus, patient rehabilitation is of paramount importance. Phase I of cardiac rehabilitation helps prevent the pulmonary and functional sequelae found in patients whilst in ICU and during hospitalisation. Functional progression based on the global muscle strength, mobility, and exercise tolerance seem to be a good alternative for this population. The role of physiotherapy in critical care is crucial for the proper treatment of these patients.

Keywords Heart transplant; Cardiac rehabilitation; Critical care rehabilitation

Introduction

Heart transplantation has become the therapeutic intervention of choice for patients with advanced heart failure (HF). Although life expectancy increases considerably after receiving a transplant, survival rates remain inferior to that of healthy individuals. Functional capacity, exercise tolerance and health-related quality of life are significantly reduced in heart transplant patients1. Individualised exercise prescription and assessment of exercise intensity appear to be the most applicable strategy for this group2-5.

Phase I of cardiac rehabilitation and early mobilisation programmes in the cardiac intensive care unit

Phase I of cardiac rehabilitation programmes (CRP) encompasses the patient's period of hospitalisation, which includes a stay in the intensive care unit (ICU), and focuses primarily on reducing functional complications stemming from hospitalisation6. Early mobilisation is one of the cornerstones of Phase I. Early mobilisation is defined as the initiation of active exercise within the first five days following the onset of critical pathology, including those who are new heart transplant recipients7.

The following is a brief description of a patient with chronic heart failure (CHF) who underwent a heart transplant. His clinical scenario and his management by the Cardiology Department and Critical Area Physiotherapy Department, at Hospital General de México "Dr. Eduardo Liceaga", went from the lowest level of functionality in the ICU to an independent discharge to this home.

Clinical case

A 31-year-old male patient with a history of dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), and a diagnosis of decompensated heart failure (HF) with severely reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (<16%). He presented with progressive dyspnoea and intolerance to physical activity, with New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification III and AHA/ACC/HFSA stage D. Patient's history included mitral valve replacement by mechanical prosthesis in October 2017, with good functional progression, which then developed into severe paravalvular leak (PVL) and severe tricuspid regurgitation.

In 2019, the patient presented with reduced exercise tolerance and physical activity. With the exacerbation of symptoms in April 2022 due to SARS-CoV-2 infection, he was admitted to a COVID-19 converted intensive care unit of Hospital General de México "Dr. Eduardo Liceaga". After a thorough assessment by the Cardiology Department and the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit (CICU), it was decided to present him as a candidate for a heart transplant. Surgery took place on June 9th 2022 with an orthotopic transplantation from a deceased 23-year-old man. Cold ischaemia lasted three and a half hours. Mechanical ventilation was successfully weaned 24 hours after surgery. Transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) performed four days after surgery revealed an LVEF of 55%. An endomyocardial biopsy was performed on June 27th 2022, showing 2R graft rejection managed by immunosuppression, with 1R control at one week.

Initial physiotherapy assessment

On 14 June 2022, the Critical Area Physiotherapy Department visited the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit (CICU) for an initial postoperative assessment at day 5. The patient was found to be in semi-Fowler position, without mechanical ventilation, calm and cooperative. The Glasgow Coma Scale was 15/15, Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) 0 points, with no signs of delirium. He was receiving haemodynamic support with dobutamine in moderate doses, as a continuous infusion, to maintain arterial perfusion pressures. Physical examination revealed a mediastinal tube and two left and right chest tubes connected to suction with functional water seals.

Global muscle strength was assessed using the Medical Research Council Sum-Score (MRC-SS)8-10, with an initial score of 55/60 and hand dynamometry with a force of 22 kg on the dominant side. Favourable results ruled out the presence of intensive care unit-acquired weakness (ICU-AW). Similarly, the initial degree of functionality was assessed using the ICU Mobility Scale (IMS), with a score of 1/10 that, for the time being, represented the functional ability to perform active movement/exercise in bed independently.

Figure 1 illustrates an algorithm for implementing an early mobilisation programme in CICU. This programme is accompanied by interventions likely to facilitate functional progression according to the score obtained on the MRC-SS and IMS scales.

Figure 1 Early mobilization algorithm during Phase I. 

Functional progression in the CICU

Phase I of the CRP began on the fifth post-surgical day with physical rehabilitation sessions: twice a day, six times a week, 40 to 60 minutes per session. The time slotted to the preparation, plateau (main) and recovery phases of the physical exercise were considered. The intervention began with active, resistant exercises of all four limbs in bed, using elastic bands, walking sticks and gravity itself, in all ranges of motion. According to the optimal outcomes in muscle strength and mobility tolerance, the strategy of each intervention was aimed to reach daily functional challenges. The achievement of functional progression is described in the IMS and days of physiotherapy sessions and shown in Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4. Starting with stages with lower complexity of mobility but which represent a milestone in the naturalness of movement, such as sitting at the edge of the bed, transferring to the bed, achieving supported active standing. Then, stages with a higher degree of complexity such as walking on the spot, assisted walking and finally independent walking.

Figure 2 Functional progression of the patient according to the ICU Mobility Scale. ICU mobility scale (IMS): 0 = Nothing lying in bed, 1 = sitting in bed (exercises in bed), 2 = Passive transfer to chair, 3 = sitting at the edge of the bed, 4 = standing, 5 = transfer active chair, 6= static walking, 7 = walking with the assistance of 2 people, 8 = walking with the assistance of 1 person, 9 = independent walking with the help of a walking aid (cane or walker), 10 = independent walking. 

Figure 3 ICU Mobility Scale of 4/10 (patient in assisted standing). 

Figure 4 Patient performing exercises with elastic resistance and inspiratory muscle training with linear pressure loading device. 

The modified Borg Rating Scale of Perceived Exertion (RPE)11,12 was used to monitor and guide exercise intensity. By consensus, the following safety parameters were defined for stopping exercise: perceived exertion rated > 4 on the modified Borg rating scale, increased heart rate > 15 bpm from baseline and/or clinical evidence of exercise intolerance. Heart rate was not used for exercise prescription.

Complementary exercises were included, such as inspiratory muscle training (IMT) with a linear pressure loading device, and breathing exercises with positive expiratory pressure devices (Threshold PEP®, for both). As for the characteristics of the denervated heart, HR was between 110 and 115 bpm during the initial phase. There was no relevant chronotropic response during exercise.

Physiotherapeutic assessment at discharge

After 16 days of stay in the CICU and treatment by our team, it was decided to perform a series of examinations similar to the one described on the first day of treatment. However, the functional development and tolerance to physical activity that had developed after the intensive prescription of physical activity in the ICU allowed us to include Tinetti Gait and Balance Test, Barthel Index and the one-minute sit to stand test (1-MSTST). The following results were obtained on the day of discharge: IMS mobility level of 10/10 points, representing the ability to move independently without walking aids. An overall muscle strength score, according to the MRC-SS, of 60/60 points; and a total of 27.3 kg of grip strength in the dominant hand, measured by manual dynamometry. No integrated diagnosis of intensive care unit-acquired weakness (ICU-AW). At hospital discharge, with a level of mild dependence, according to the Barthel Index, with a total of 95 points. A favourable outcome, with no risk of falling, according to the assessment and score obtained in the Tinetti Gait and Balance Test; with 14/16 points for balance, 12/12 points for gait, and a total sum of 26/28 points. Finally, the global response and tolerance to exercise-induced stress were assessed using the 1-MSTST, obtaining a score of 17. In January 2023, a follow-up consultation was carried out, and the patient resumed his professional activities without restriction and reported full reintegration into his social roles.

Discussion

Heart transplant patients represent a challenge for healthcare professionals involved in their care. Rehabilitation plays an important role in achieving a favourable outcome for this population. The integration and monitoring of all its components optimises outcomes and enables patients to adhere to the CRP, even during their stay in intensive care. As part of CRP and ICU discharge programmes, education of the patient and family members about their condition, overall care, safety parameters and the benefits of exercise training, psychological follow-up, management by the nutrition department, optimised pharmacological treatment and ongoing exercise are of paramount importance13,14.

Although there are many tools for assessing functionality in the ICU, it seems prudent to use the IMS, due to its practicality, reproducibility and that it has been shown to be associated with significant outcomes at discharge. Exercise prescription in critically ill patients represents a major challenge for rehabilitation professionals. We now know that the best way to achieve this is to set functional goals and take account of the patient's perceived tolerance of exercise. Early mobility has been shown to be an important factor in reducing complications after cardiac surgery15,16. Inspiratory muscle training improves lung capacity, increases peak inspiratory pressure and reduces days of hospital stay. The use of positive expiratory pressure devices, such as the Threshold PEP®, can reduce atelectasis, improve residual functional capacity and promote drainage of tracheobronchial secretions17.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the directors and representatives of Hospital General de México "Dr. Eduardo Liceaga". We also thank the heart donor and his family for changing the life of an extraordinary patient whom we had the honour of caring for.

References

1. Kavanagh T, Mertens DJ, Hamm LF, Beyene J, Kennedy J, Corey P, et al. Prediction of long-term prognosis in 12169 men referred for cardiac rehabilitation. Circulation 2002;106:666-671 [PMID:12163425 DOI:10.1161/01.CIR.0000024413.15949.ED [ Links ]

2. Rognmo Ø, Hetland E, Helgerud J, Hoff J, Slørdahl SA. High intensity aerobic interval exercise is superior to moderate intensity exercise for increasing aerobic capacity in patients with coronary artery disease. Eur J Cardiovasc PrevRehabil 2004;11:216-222 [PMID:15179103 DOI:10.1097/01.hjr.0000131677.96762.0c [ Links ]

3. Weston KS, Wisløff U, Coombes JS. High-intensity interval training in patients with lifestyle-induced cardiometabolic disease:a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2014;48:1227-1234. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2013-092576 [ Links ]

4. Wisløff U, Støylen A, Loennechen JP, Bruvold M, Rognmo Ø, Haram PM, et al. Superior cardiovascular effect of aerobic interval training versus moderate continuous training in heart failure patients:a randomized study. Circulation 2007;115:3086-3094 [PMID:17548726DOI:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.675041 [ Links ]

5. Arena R, Myers J, Forman DE, Lavie CJ, Guazzi M. Should high-intensity-aerobic interval training become the clinical standard in heart failure?Heart Fail Rev 2013;18:95-105 [PMID:22791516 DOI:10.1007/s10741-012-9333-z [ Links ]

6. Maroto JM, De Pablo C. 2011. Capitulo 1. Rehabilitación Cardiaca. Historia. Indicaciones. Protocolos. En Maroto, J.M y De Pablo, C. Rehabilitación Cardiovascular. (1era Ed., Pag.3.) Médica Panamericana. [ Links ]

7. Hodgson CL, Schaller SJ, Nydahl P, Timenetsky KT, Needham DM. Ten strategies to optimize early mobilization and rehabilitation in intensive care. Crit Care. 2021 Sep 3;25(1):324. doi:10.1186/s13054-021-03741-z. PMID:34479621;PMCID:PMC8414658. [ Links ]

8. Stevens RD, Marshall SA, Cornblath DR, Hoke A, Needham DM, de Jonghe B, et al. A framework for diagnosing and classifying intensive care unit-acquired weakness. Crit Care Med. 2009 Oct;37(10 Suppl):S299-308. doi:10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181b6ef67. PMID:20046114. [ Links ]

9. Latronico N, Herridge M, Hopkins RO, Angus D, Hart N, Hermans G, et al. The ICM research agenda on intensive care unit-acquired weakness. Intensive Care Med. 2017 Sep;43(9):1270-1281. doi:10.1007/s00134-017-4757-5. Epub 2017 Mar 13. PMID:28289812. [ Links ]

10. Vanpee G, Hermans G, Segers J, Gosselink R. Assessment of limb muscle strength in critically ill patients:a systematic review. Crit Care Med. 2014 Mar;42(3):701-11. doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000000030. PMID:24201180. [ Links ]

11. Wilson RC, Jones PW. A comparison of the visual analogue scale and modified Borg scale for the measurement of dyspnoea during exercise. Clin Sci (Lond). 1989 Mar;76(3):277-82. doi:10.1042/cs0760277. PMID:2924519. [ Links ]

12. Strassmann A, Steurer-Stey C, Lana KD, Zoller M, Turk AJ, Suter P, et al. Population-based reference values for the 1-min sit-to-stand test. Int J Public Health. 2013 Dec;58(6):949-53. doi:10.1007/s00038-013-0504-z. Epub 2013 Aug 24. PMID:23974352. [ Links ]

13. Ponikowski P, Voors AA, Anker SD, Bueno H, Cleland JGF, Coats AJS, et al. ESC Scientific Document Group. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure:The Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J. 2016 Jul 14;37(27):2129-2200. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehw128. Epub 2016 May 20. Erratum in:Eur Heart J. 2016 Dec 30;:PMID:27206819. [ Links ]

14. O'Connor CM, Whellan DJ, Lee KL, Keteyian SJ, Cooper LS, Ellis SJ, et al. HF-ACTION Investigators. Efficacy and safety of exercise training in patients with chronic heart failure:HF-ACTION randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2009 Apr 8;301(14):1439-50. doi:10.1001/jama.2009.454. PMID:19351941;PMCID:PMC2916661. [ Links ]

15. Wang YT, Lang JK, Haines KJ, Skinner EH, Haines TP. Physical Rehabilitation in the ICU:A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Crit Care Med. 2022 Mar 1;50(3):375-388. doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000005285. PMID:34406169. [ Links ]

16. O'Connor CM, Whellan DJ, Lee KL, Keteyian SJ, Cooper LS, Ellis SJ, et al. HF-ACTION Investigators. Efficacy and safety of exercise training in patients with chronic heart failure:HF-ACTION randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2009 Apr 8;301(14):1439-50. doi:10.1001/jama.2009.454. PMID:19351941;PMCID:PMC2916661. [ Links ]

17. Bissett B, Leditschke IA, Green M, Marzano V, Collins S, Van Haren F. (2019). Inspiratory muscle training for intensive care patients:A multidisciplinary practical guide for clinicians. Australian critical care:official journal of the Confederation of Australian Critical Care Nurses, 32(3), 249-255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aucc.2018.06.001 [ Links ]

FundingThe authors declare that there was no funding for this article.

Ethical disclosures

Protection of humans and animals. The authors declare that no experiments on humans or animals have been performed for this research.

Confidentiality of data. The authors declare that they have followed their center's protocols on the publication of patient data.

Right to privacy and informed consent. The authors have obtained the informed consent of the patients and/or subjects referred to in the article. This document is in the possession of the corresponding author.

Received: January 16, 2023; Accepted: April 18, 2023

* Correspondence: Robert A. Jones-Baro E-mail: rjonesbaro@hotmail.com

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Creative Commons License Sociedad Médica del Hospital General de Mexico. Published by Permanyer. This is an open ccess article under the CC BY-NC-ND license