SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.83 issue4Role of p53 and ki-67 in sebaceous neoplasmsEvaluation of germline RET proto-oncogene variants in Peruvian patients with medullary thyroid carcinoma author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Revista médica del Hospital General de México

On-line version ISSN 2524-177XPrint version ISSN 0185-1063

Rev. med. Hosp. Gen. Méx. vol.83 n.4 Ciudad de México Oct./Dec. 2020  Epub Sep 06, 2021

https://doi.org/10.24875/hgmx.20000096 

Original articles

Gynecological cancer: Evolution of its relative frequency

Alfonso Torres-Lobatón1  * 

Elisa P. Jiménez-Arroyo1 

Rosalva Barra-Martínez1 

Juan C. Oliva-Posada1 

Carla A. Suárez-Juárez1 

Fred Morgan-Ortiz2 

1Oncology Service, Hospital General de México "Dr. Eduardo Liceaga", Mexico City, Mexico

2Centro de Investigación en Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa, Culiacán, Sinaloa. Mexico


ABSTRACT

Objective:

The objective of the study was to show the relative frequency of gynecological cancers at an oncology unit comparing these results with two previous studies, by highlighting the increase in the number of uterine cancers.

Materials and methods:

Review the number of cases of gynecological cancers at the Oncology Service of the General Hospital of Mexico from 2016 to 2017, comparing it with two previous periods, 1983-1984 and 2010-2011.

Results:

We included 931 patients with gynecological cancers, 427 patients with cervical cancer (45.8%), 274 patients with uterine cancer (29.4%), and 206 patients with ovarian cancer (22.1%). When comparing these results with the previous ones, we found that the numbers of cervical cancer decreased from 86.8% to 57.8% to 45.8 % (p < 0.05); uterine cancer from 4.5% to 17.9% to 29.4% (p = 0.0001); and ovarian cancer from 6.2% (p < 0.05) to 19.7% (p = 0.185). The larger histological group for cervical cancer is adenocarcinomas (18.1%) and the main histology in uterine cancers is endometrial (86.8%). From this total, 71.4% patients are either overweight or obese. About 63.9% of cases were diagnosed as late-stage cancers.

Conclusions:

In this series, we detected a decrease in the frequency of cervical cancers, with adenocarcinomas increasing in percentage, and a significant increase in uterine cancers associated with overweightness and obesity. Advanced stages of gynecological cancers were prevalent.

Key words: Gynecological; Cancer; Relative; Frequency; Evolution

Introduction

Cervical cancer is a public health problem in developing countries because it is often diagnosed in already advanced stages and presents the highest mortality rate among gynecological cancers1,2. Conversely, in recent years, the frequency of uterine cancer linked to metabolic syndrome and obesity is on the rise3,4.

The World Health Organization estimated that by 2018, there would be 190,667 new cases of cancer in Mexico, of which 105,051 (50.9%) cases would be affecting women. In relation to this total, 20,570 (19.5%) cases occurred in the reproductive tract with 7869 cases of cervical cancer (38.2%), 7266 (35.3%) cases of uterine cancer, 4759 (23.1%) cases of ovarian cancer, 422 (2.0%) cases of vulvar cancer, and 254 (1.2%) cases of vaginal cancer5.

This article shows the relative frequency of cancers of the female reproductive tract in a high-specialty cancer center for the period 2016-2017. Some of this data is compared with data published in two previous periods. The increase in the number of uterine cancers was highlighted and conclusions were drawn accordingly.

Materials and methods

During the period 2016-2017, 2185 patients were attended at the Gynecological Tumor Unit of the Oncology Service at the General Hospital of Mexico "Dr. Eduardo Liceaga." 1066 patients received a histopathological diagnosis of gynecological cancer: cervical, uterine, ovarian, vulvar, vaginal, and trophoblastic tumors.

According the respective medical records, information was obtained related to the frequency of each neoplasm, patients' age, histopathological varieties, and classification according to that of the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics in its 2009 version6,7. For uterine cancers, the body mass index (BMI) was investigated, considering a BMI of 25-29.9 as overweightness and a BMI of 30.0-50 or more8 as obesity. The results obtained regarding the relative frequency of neoplasms and the clinical classification for cervical cancer were compared to those results reported in the previous publications for the years 1983-1984 and 2010-20119,10. These results were subjected to statistical analysis using the Epi-InfoTM 6.04d system.

Results

During the period analyzed, 1026 patients were treated. Ninety (8.7%) cases corresponded to high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN 3): eighty-six cases corresponded to cervical cancer, two cases corresponded to vulvar cancer, and two cases to vaginal cancer. The relative frequency and age ranges for invasive cancers are shown in table 1. The average age for invasive cervical cancers was 50 years, 55 years for uterine cancers, and 47 years for ovarian epithelial cancer.

Table 1 Gynecological cancer. Relative frequency and age ranges 

Neoplasm Number of patients Percentage Age (minimum-maximum)* Average age*
Cervical cancer 427 45.6 22-92 50
Uterine cancer 274 29.2 29-85 55
Ovarian epithelial cancer 206 22.0 21-83 47
Vulvar cancer 22 2.3 37-90 68
Trophoblastic tumors 5 0.5 18-40 29
Vaginal cancer 2 0.2 42-68 56
Total 936 99.8 - -

*In years.

The relative frequency of gynecological cancers in three different periods (1983-1984, 2010-2011, and 2016-2017) is shown in table 2. The decrease in the frequency of cervical cancers among invasive cancers is highlighted, which represented 86.8% of neoplasms in 1983-1984 and 45.8% in 2016-2017 (p < 0.05). In addition, the increase in the frequency of uterine cancers was evident between the period 2010-2011 (17.9%) and also the period 2016-2017 (29.4%), p ≤ 0.0001. This situation led to its rising from third in the period 2010-2011 to the second position for the period 2016-2017. As presented in table 3, 63.9% of patients in the overall series had advanced neoplasms, (Stages II-IV). The figure includes 75.3% of invasive cervical cancers, 41.6% of uterine cancers, 68.3% of ovarian epithelial cancers, and 68.1% of vulvar cancers.

Table 2 Gynecological cancer. Relative frequency in different periods 

Neoplasm (I) 1983-1984 (II) 2010-2011 (III) 2016-2017 Significance
Number % Number % Number %
1. Cervical cancer 727 86.8 632 57.8 427 45.8 I vs.II p < 0.05
2.Uterine cancer 38 4.5 197 17.9 274 29.4 I vs. II p < 0.05
3. Ovarian epithelial cancer 52 6.2 213 19.7 206 22.1 I vs. II p < 0.05
4. Vulvar cancer 16 1.9 22 2.0 22 2.3 I vs.II p = 0.845
5. Vaginal cancer 4 0.4 16 1.4 2 0.2 I vs.II p = 0.032
Total 837 99.8 1,080 99.8 931 99.8

1: II) versus (III) p < 0.05; 2: (II) versus (III) p = 0.0001; 3: (II) versus (III) p = 0.185; 4: (II versus III) p = 0.618; 5: (II) versus (III) p = 0.003.

Table 3 Gynecological cancer 2016-2017. Clinical stage and number of patient ratio 

Clinical stage Cervical* Uterine** Ovarian Vulvar*** Vaginal**** Total
Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %
I 91 24.5 141 58.2 65 31.4 7 31.8 - 304 36.0
II 116 31.2 28 11.5 4 1.9 1 4.5 - 149 17.6
III 91 24.5 46 19.0 100 48.5 7 31.8 1 50.0 245 29.0
IV 73 19.6 27 11.1 37 17.9 7 31.8 1 50.0 145 17.2
Total 371 99.8 242 99.8 206 99.7 22 99.9 2 100 843 99.8

*CIN 3: 86/513: 16.7%). No classifiable

*56/513: (10.9%).

**No. Classifiable: 32/274: (13.2%).

***No classifiable:2/24 (8.3%).

****VAIN 3: 2/4: 50%.

*CIN 3: cervical intraepithelial neoplasia Grade 3.

****VAIN 3: vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia Grade 3.

Cervical cancer

A total of 513 patients were treated, of these 86 with CIN1 (16.7%) and 427 (83.2%) with Invasive cancer (Table 3). As for histological variants, 419 patients (81.6%) presented epidermoid carcinomas; 93 patients (18.1%) had adenocarcinomas; and one patient (0.1%) developed a neuroendocrine carcinoma.

The relative frequency of clinical stages during the analyzed periods is displayed in table 4. It highlights the decrease in the number of patients treated in the period 2016-2017 in relation to the two previous periods. The decrease in Stage I care in the period 2016-2017 in relation to the period 2010-2011, (p = 0.0003); and the increase in Stage IV frequency observed for the last period: seventy-three cases for 2016-2017 (19.6%) versus 63 cases for 2010-2011 (10.2%) (p = 0.00004).

Table 4 Cervical cancer. Comparative study of its frequency in three different periods 

Clinical stage (I) 1983-1984 (II) 2010-2011 (III) 2016-2017 Significance
No. % No. % No. %
(a).I 104 15.8 219 35.5 91 24.5 I versus II p < 0.05
(b).II 270 41.1 190 31.0 116 31.2 I versus II p = 0.0001
(c).III 214 32.6 144 23.3 91 24.5 I versus II p = 0.0002
(d).IV 68 10.3 63 10.2 73 19.6 I versus II p = 0.9352
Total 656 99.8 616 99.9 371 99.8

a: (II) versus (III) p = 0.0003; b: (II) versus (III) p = 0.945; c: (II) versus (III) p= 0.738; d: (II versus III) p= 0.00004.

About 62.4% of the total patients treated hailed from the countryside, 44.5% from the State of Mexico, and the remainder mainly from the States of Veracruz (7.2%), Hidalgo (2.4%), Oaxaca and Guerrero (1.8% respectively), Morelos (1.5%), and Michoacán (0.6%).

Uterine cancer

274 patients with malignant uterine tumors were treated, of which 250 cases (91.2%) corresponded to carcinomas and 24 cases (8.7%) to sarcomas. Among the carcinomas, endometrial carcinoma occurred in 217 patients (86.8%) being the most frequent type of carcinoma. 155 of these patients (71.4%) were overweight or obese. The other cases consisted of 15 (6%) cases of uterine papillary serous carcinoma; 10 (4.0%) cases of clear-cell carcinoma; 6 (2.4%) cases of carcinosarcoma; 1 (0.4%) case of adenosquamous carcinoma, and 1 (0.4%) case of neuroendocrine carcinoma. The latter case involved a 59-year-old patient with an initial diagnosis compatible with carcinosarcoma, who underwent surgery and was classified as stage IIIC2. The immunohistochemistry study established the diagnosis of neuroendocrine carcinoma. The patient received radiotherapy and started with platinum-based chemotherapy in combination with etoposide. Four months after diagnosis, a positron emission tomography-computed tomography scan showed multiple mediastinal and bone metastases. The patient died 6 months later.

Regarding the group of sarcomas, leiomyosarcoma appeared as the most frequent with 13 cases (54.1%). It was followed by endometrial stromal sarcoma with nine cases (37.5%) and adenosarcoma with two cases (8.3%).

Regarding clinical classification, 58.2% of cases (141 patients) were classified as Stage I. Seventy-three patients (30.1%) were classified as Stages III and IV (Table 3). Ninety-five (67.4%) out of 141 carcinomas classified as Stage I, corresponded to Stage Ia and 46 cases (32.5%) corresponded to Ib. As for 46 cases classified as Stage III, nine (19.5%) cases showed adnexal metastases (Stage IIIa), nine (19.5%) cases showed parametrial invasion and/or vaginal metastases (Stage IIIB), and 28 (60.8%) cases showed metastases to regional lymph nodes (Stage IIIc). Regarding the latter, 17 (60.8%) cases were related to pelvic lymph nodes (Stage IIIc1) and 11 (39.2%) cases were related to the para-aortic lymph nodes.

Ovarian cancer

246 cases were recorded, of which 206 (83.7%) cases were epithelial neoplasms (Table 5): 110 (53.3%) cases of serous carcinoma, 42 (20.3%) cases of endometrioid carcinoma, 25 (12.1%) cases of mucinous carcinoma, 16 (7.7%) cases of clear-cell carcinoma, and 13 (6.3%) undifferentiated cases.

Table 5 Ovarian tumors 

Histopathology Number of cases Percentage
Epithelial 206 83.7
Germ cell 23 9.3
Stromal 17 6.9
Total 246 99.9

Twenty-three (9.3%) cases corresponded to germ cell tumors; regarding this total, 11 (47.6%) cases corresponded to dysgerminomas, 8 (34.7%) cases of immature teratoma, 3 (13.0%) cases of mixed carcinoma, and 1 (4.3%) case of choriocarcinoma. Seventeen patients were diagnosed with stromal tumors: 11 (64.7%) cases of granulosa cell tumors and 6 (35.2%) cases of Sertoli-Leydig cell tumors.

About 63.5% of epithelial tumors were classified as Stages III and IV, and 47.3% of germ-cell tumors were classified as Stage I. The relationship between histological grade and clinical stages is shown in table 6.

Table 6 Ovarian tumors. Clinical stage relationship with different histological types 

Clinical stage Epithelial* Germ cell** Stromal Total
No. % No. % No. % No. %
I 51 24.7 9 47.3 14 82.3 74 33.4
II 3 1.4 2 10.5 1 5.8 6 2.7
III 94 45.6 6 31.5 - - 100 45.2
IV 37 17.9 2 10.5 2 11.7 41 18.5
Total 206 99.7 19 99.8 17 99.8 221 99.8

*Borderline tumors: 21/206 (10.1%);

**No classifiable: 4/23 (17.3%).

Discussion

Although a decrease in the number of cervical cancers had already been reported in our Health Centre for 2010-2011: (57.8%)10 in relation to those published for 1983-19849, (86.8%), (p < 0.05); there was a significant decrease for the period 2016-2017: 57.8% vs. 45.8% (p < 0.05). However, this disease still ranks high among the leading causes of gynecological cancer admissions in hospitals and health units that serve low-income people in need of social security protection. It is likely that this decrease is related to more efficient health screening services for the disease11 and an increase in coverage for its treatment, as the federal government of Mexico has implemented a free cancer care program since 2004.

Unfortunately, advanced clinical stages of the disease still predominate, because more than 60% of the population that pursues medical treatment at the General Hospital of Mexico "Dr. Eduardo Liceaga," hails from the countryside, where the necessary infrastructure for the comprehensive treatment of this type of cancer is not available12.

The increase in frequency, reported at the General Hospital of Mexico "Dr. Eduardo Liceaga", regarding uterine cancer from 2010 to 201110 compared to that observed in the years 1983-19849: was 17.9% versus 4.5% and a rise of 29.4% in the numbers of this disease for the years 2016 and 2017, placing it second amongst all other gynecological cancers. In contrast, ovarian cancer has gone from 2nd to 3rd place.

We associate this change in the epidemiology of the neoplasms with the increase in obesity in recent years1,4. These pathologies increased from 1975 to 2014, going from 12% to 33% in China and 39.5% to 64% in Iran. In the US and Mexico, these numbers exceed 60% for women over the age of 181.

There is evidence that endocrine and nutritional lifestyle factors influence the origin of 5% of cancers in women worldwide, including uterine, ovarian, and breast cancer4. Obese premenopausal and postmenopausal women are far more likely to develop type I endometrial cancer (up to 40%), which is of good prognosis, rather than type II, which is not associated with overweightness and obesity. In addition, type II endometrial cancer has a less favorable prognosis4,13. About 86.8% of the cases presented in this series developed type I endometrial cancer and 71.4% of these patients were overweight or obese.

The National Institute of Public Health in Mexico published in 2018 that in the past three decades, the prevalence of overweightness and obesity in Mexican children and adults has increased. At present, Mexico is one of the two countries with the highest prevalence of obesity in the world14. In 2016, the prevalence of overweightness in adults aged 20 years or older was 72.5%14.

Several studies have been published reporting that overweightness and obesity significantly increase the risk of developing ovarian epithelial cancer4 as well as endocervical and adenosquamous epithelial carcinoma15. According to information provided by the Institute of Public Health14, this would justify the increase observed from 6.2% to 22.1% in ovarian epithelial cancers9,10 and 11%15 to 18% in the numbers of cervical adenocarcinomas reported herein. These factors could also have influenced the presentation of a lower age for ovarian epithelial cancer (47 years) in relation to that of 60 years and older referred to in the literature16-18. This observation would also apply to the age of 55 years reported here for uterine cancers8,13.

As for the patient with neuroendocrine carcinoma of the endometrium reported here, which represented 0.4% of the frequency for this site, very few follow-up cases without tumor activity have been reported, which globally do not exceed 30% at 5 years.

In relation to vulvar, vaginal and trophoblastic tumors, their numbers in terms of frequency and age have remained unchanged in recent years, except for vaginal cancer, whose numbers have decreased from 1.4% to 0.2% (p = 0.003) and for trophoblastic tumors where there was also a decrease from 1.3%8 to 0.5%.

Conclusions

The frequency of invasive cervical cancer in relation to other cancers has decreased from 57.8% in the years 2010-2011 to 45.8% for the period 2016-2017. The frequency of cervical adenocarcinoma increased from 11% observed in the period 2005-2008 to 18% for the period 2016-2107.

The frequency of ovarian and uterine cancers increased from 19.7% and 17.9% in the period 2010 to 2011, to 22.1% and 29.4%, respectively for the years 2016 to 2017. The age of 47 and 55 years shown for these tumors in this series is lower than the age of 60 and older mentioned in the literature.

The increase in the frequency of uterine cancers reported in this series, corresponded to 86.8% cases of endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinoma. This variety has been associated with being overweight and/or obese, which was present in 71.4% of the cases studied.

About 63.9% of patients with reproductive tract cancers, who were treated at the Oncology Service of the General Hospital of Mexico "Dr. Eduardo Liceaga," had late-stage cancers.

REFERENCES

1. Islami F, Torre AL, Drope MJ, Ward ME, Jemal A. Gobal cancer in women:cancer control priorities. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2017;26:458-70. [ Links ]

2. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Gemal A. Cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012;62:10-29. [ Links ]

3. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts and Figures. United States:American Cancer Society. 2017. 21-9. [ Links ]

4. Feng YH. The asociation between obesity and gynecological cancer. Gynecol Min Invasive Ther. 2015;4:102-5. [ Links ]

5. World Health Organization. Source Globocan 2018, Number of New Cases Both Sexes. International Agency for Research on Cancer. Mexico:World Health Organization;2018. 1-2. [ Links ]

6. FIGO Committee on Gynecologic Oncology. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva, cervix and endometrium. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2009;105:103-5. [ Links ]

7. FIGO Committee on Gynecologic Oncology. Current FIGO staging for cancer of the vagina, fallopian tube, ovary and gestational trophoblastic neoplasia. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009;105:3-4. [ Links ]

8. Nevadunsky SN, Arsdale V, Strickler DH, Moadel A, Kaur G, Levitt J, et al. Obesity and age at diagnosis of endometrial cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;124:300-6. [ Links ]

9. Torres LA. Plata NP, Cruz TF, Pérez H, García H, Román B, et al. Cáncer ginecológico, 1983-1984. Frecuencia relativa y resultados del tratamiento. Unidad de oncología. Rev Med Hosp Gen. 1987;50:169-77. [ Links ]

10. Torres LA, Amoretti C, Morgan OF. Cáncer ginecológico:evolución de su frecuencia relativa en una institución de alta especialidad. Gac Mex Oncol. 2014;13:222-8. [ Links ]

11. Torres SL, Rojas MR, Escamilla NC, De la Vara SE, Lazcano PE. Tendencias en la mortalidad por cáncer en México de 1980 a 2011. Salud Publ Mex. 2014;56:473-91. [ Links ]

12. Torres LA, Bustamante IJ, Torres RA, Oliva PJ, Morales PM, Román BE. Cáncer cervicouterino. Perfil epidemiológico en 1,217 pacientes. Seguro popular. Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2013;81:71-6. [ Links ]

13. Hacker FN, Friedlander M. Cáncer uterino. In:Oncología Ginecológica de Berek and Hacker. 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA, USA:Lippincott Williams &Wilkins;2010. 396-7. [ Links ]

14. Campos NI, Cuevas NL, González CL, Hernández BL, Shama LL, González de CM, et al. Epidemiología de la obesidad y sus principales comorbilidades en México. In:Dommarco JA, editor. La Obesidad en México. Estado de la Política Pública y Recomendaciones Para su Prevención y Control. México:Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública;2018. 31-8. [ Links ]

15. Pocrnich S, Ramalingam P, Euscher DE, Malpica A. Neuroendocrine carcinoma of the endometrium;a clincopathologic study of 25 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2016;40:577-86. [ Links ]

16. Fujiwara K, Monk B, Devouassoux-Shisheboran M. Adenocaricnoma of the uterine cervix:Why is it different?Curr Oncol Rep. 2014;16:416-22. [ Links ]

17. BereK SJ, Friedlander M, Hacker NF. Cáncer epitelial de ovario, de trompas de Falopio y peritoneal. In:Oncología Ginecológica de Berek and Hacker. 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA, USA:Lippincott Williams &Wilkins;2010. 455-6. [ Links ]

18. Minig L, BarcelóBI, Zorrero C, Velasco P. Dignóstico, estadiaje y diagnóstico precoz del cáncer epitelial de ovario In:Velasco AP, editor. Cáncer de Ovario. España:Permanyer;2017. 14-21. [ Links ]

Ethical disclosures

Protection of human and animal subjects. The authors declare that no experiments were performed on humans or animals for this study.

Confidentiality of data. The authors declare that they have followed the protocols of their work center on the publication of patient data.

Right to privacy and informed consent. The authors declare that no patient data appear in this article.

Received: December 20, 2019; Accepted: April 01, 2020

* Correspondence: Alfonso Torres-Lobatón E-mail: drtorreslobaton@prodigy.net.mx

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest.

Creative Commons License Instituto Nacional de Cardiología Ignacio Chávez. Published by Permanyer. This is an open ccess article under the CC BY-NC-ND license