SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.90 número4Prevalencia de dos años de lesiones por arma de fuego en la columna en México: una experiencia de un solo centroAneurısmas arterıales de extremıdad superıor: etıología, manejo y resultado índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Cirugía y cirujanos

versão On-line ISSN 2444-054Xversão impressa ISSN 0009-7411

Cir. cir. vol.90 no.4 Ciudad de México Jul./Ago. 2022  Epub 19-Ago-2022

https://doi.org/10.24875/ciru.21000148 

Artículos originales

Can clinicopathological factors improve the prediction of metastasis to nonsentinel lymph nodes in patients with breast cancer?

¿Pueden los factores clínicopatológicos mejorar la predicción de metástasis en ganglios linfáticos no centinelas en pacientes con cáncer de mama?

José A. García-Mejido1  2  * 

Miguel Sánchez-Sevilla1 

Jesús González-Martínez3 

Ana Fernández-Palacín4 

José A. Sainz-Bueno1 

1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Valme University Hospital, Seville

2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Seville

3Department of Plastic Surgery, University Hospital of Barcelona, Bellvitge Hospital

4Department of Preventive Medicine and Public, Health Biostatistics Unit, University of Seville, Spain


Abstract

Introduction:

To determine whether clinicopathological characteristics can improve the prediction of metastasis to nonsentinel lymph nodes (NSLNs) over the use of only mRNA copy number in sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsies.

Methods:

This was a retrospective, observational study that included a total of 824 patients with T1-3 breast cancer who had clinically negative, ultrasound-negative axilla without evidence of metastasis and who underwent one-step nucleic acid amplification in SLN biopsies.

Results:

118 required a complete axillary lymph node dissection (ALNhD). About 35.6% (42/118) had metastases to a NSLN, and 64.4% (76/118) had no metastasis to a NSLN. The ROC curve of the total tumor load (TTL) presented an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.651 (95%; CI: 0.552-0.751). The 7294 copies of CK19 mRNA were established as the optimal cutoff point, with sensitivity: 93%, specificity: 63%, positive predictive value: 44%, and negative predictive value: 91%. By associating the clinicopathological parameters (multicentricity, pooled immunohistochemistry [IHC], and progesterone receptors), the AUC went up to 0.752 (95% CI: 0.663-0.841).

Conclusions:

Clinicopathological factors should be considered together with the total CK19 mRNA copy number (the TTL) of the SLNs to improve the predictive capacity of metastatic involvement of the NSLNs.

Keywords Carcinoma breast cancer; Sentinel lymph node/SLN; Nucleic acid amplification/OSNA; Tumor load CK19

Resumen

Introducción:

Nuestro objetivo era determinar si la influencia de las características clínicopatológicas pueden mejorar la predicción de metástasis en los ganglios linfáticos no centinelas (GLNC) a partir de un punto de corte de copias de ARNm determinado en la biopsia del ganglio linfático centinela (GLC).

Métodos:

Se realizó un estudio observacional retrospectivo incluyendo a un total de 824 pacientes con cáncer de mama T1-3, con axila clínica y ecográficamente negativa para metástasis en los ganglios axilares. Se les practicó una biopsia selectiva del GLC y estudio posterior mediante el método one step nucleic acid amplification (OSNA).

Resultados:

118 precisaron una disección completa de los ganglios linfáticos axilares. 35,6% (42/118) tuvieron metástasis en GLNC y 64.4% (76/118) no presentaron metástasis en GLNC. La curva ROC del log de la carga tumoral total (CTT) presentó un área bajo la curva de 0.651 (95%; IC: 0.552-0.751). Se estableció las 7294 copias de ARNm de CK19 como punto de corte óptimo, con sensibilidad: 93%, especificidad: 63%, valor predictivo positivo: 44% y valor predictivo negativo: 91%. Al asociar los parámetros clinicopatológicos (multicentricidad, inmunohistoquímica (IHQ) agrupado y receptores de progesterona) obtenemos un área bajo la curva mejorada de 0.752 (95% intervalo de confianza [IC] 0.663-0.841).

Conclusiones:

Los factores clinicopatológicos deberían valorarse asociados al corte de copias de ARNm de la CTT de CK19 de los GLCs para mejorar la capacidad predictiva de afectación metastásica en los GLNCs.

Palabras clave Carcinoma cáncer de mama; Ganglio centinela/SLN; Amplificación de ácido nucleico/OSNA; Carga tumoral; CK19

Introduction

At present, complete axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is not lacking in comorbidity, so there has been a tendency of decreasing rates of ALND1. Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy has become the procedure of choice to evaluate axillary involvement in patients with breast cancer. In fact, it has replaced ALND as the current standard for axillary staging in patients with breast cancer2. The incorporation of intraoperative SLN biopsy has led to a decrease in ALND, thus reducing the associated comorbidities3. To study the state of the SLN, we use at our disposal a semiquantitative method called one-step nucleic acid amplification (OSNA)4,5, based on the measurement of the amount of cytokeratin (CK)-19 (expressed in more than 95% of breast cancers)6. The OSNA technique has the same value as conventional histological techniques, presenting important benefits for patients5 with clinically negative lymph nodes.

The number of copies of CK19 detected by the OSNA technique indicates the volume of the total tumor load (TTL). Therefore, when the SLN biopsy is negative, ALND can be avoided. In cases with low TTL, the performance of ALND could be safely omitted7,8. In fact, patients with micrometastases in the SLN who are treated with SLN biopsy have a disease-free and overall survival comparable to those treated with ALND9. This has also been observed in T1-2 tumors treated with conservative surgery, radiotherapy, or adjuvant systemic therapy who have ≤ 2 SLNs with macrometastasis7. The number of copies of CK19 mRNA is related to the rate of macrometastasis to nonsentinel lymph nodes (NSLNs) and is a major predictor of metastasis to NSLNs10, but it is not the only predictor of metastasis to NSLNs. Therefore, different authors have tried to identify predictive factors of NSLN metastasis to avoid performing ALND11-14. To establish which patients would benefit from skipping an unnecessary ALND, different cutoff points of mRNA copy number have been determined15-17. We believe that there are clinicopathological features that could help improve the prediction of NSLN metastasis. Therefore, the objective of our work is to determine whether any clinicopathological characteristics can improve the prediction of metastasis over only the mRNA copy number in SLN biopsies.

Material and methods

This was a retrospective observational study that included a total of 824 consecutive patients with breast cancer who underwent SLN biopsy and OSNA between October 1, 2010, and March 31, 2018. The study (registration number: 1004-N-18) was approved January 29, 2019, by Andalucia’s Board of Biomedicine Ethics Committee.

Patients undergoing surgery for invasive mammary carcinoma staged T1-3, expressing CK19, with a clinically negative axilla, and with preoperative axillary ultrasound without positive findings or with lymph node biopsy without evidence of metastasis were included. Patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the previous ipsilateral axillary surgery, recurrence, or extensive ductal carcinoma in situ were excluded from the study.

The following demographic parameters were studied: age, menopausal status, age of menopause, parity, and number of births. The clinicopathological parameters studied were axillary lymphadenectomy, tumor size, histological type (ductal, lobular, and others), multicentricity, multifocality, lymphovascular invasion, and tumor histological grade according to the modified Bloom-Richardson system (tubules, nuclei, and mitosis). In addition, the presence of estrogen receptors (ERs), progesterone receptors (PgRs), and Her-2 protein; Ki-67 status; SLN macro- and micrometastases; NSLN macro- and micrometastases; and the TTL of the SLNs were analyzed.

The immunohistochemical (IHC) classification was based on previously established criteria18: “Luminal A-like:” all of ER and PgR positive, HER2 negative, and Ki-67 low; “Luminal B-like HER2 negative:” ER positive, HER2 negative, and at least one of Ki-67 high and PgR negative or low; “Luminal B-like HER2 positive:” ER positive, HER2 overexpressed or amplified, any Ki-67, and any PgR; “HER2 positive nonluminal:” HER2 overexpressed or amplified, ER and PgR absent; and “Triple-negative ductal:” ER and PgR absent, HER2 negative.

Pre-operative evaluation of the axilla was performed by axillary ultrasound after the diagnosis of breast cancer. Lymph nodes suspected of metastasis were those with a cortical thickening of 2-3 mm, focal bulging, rounded shape, partial or complete loss of fatty hilum, nonhilar blood flow, or partial or complete replacement of the lymph node by tumor tissue. Those suspicious lymph nodes were subjected to a thick-needle biopsy and were discarded in case of metastatic confirmation.

The identification of the SLN biopsy was performed in those patients with clinically and ultrasound-normal axilla using the established protocol with radiopharmaceuticals and blue dye. A 99mTc-labeled albumin nanocolloid was injected periareolarly intradermally (40 MBq the day before surgery). Two milliliters of undiluted methylene blue dye was injected subdermally into the periareolar area of the four breast quadrants (0.5 ml in each quadrant) under anesthesia. Once the SLN was removed, it was sent fresh to the Pathology Department, and OSNA was run. The OSNA technique was performed as described by Tsujimoto et al.4 The amplification rate was measured by spectrophotometry, and the number of copies of CK19 mRNA was calculated compared to a standard curve. The number of copies of CK19 mRNA/ml was determined according to Tsujimoto et al.4: macrometastasis: > 5,000 copies/ml of CK19 mRNA, micrometastasis: 250-5,000 copies/ml; and no metastasis: < 250 copies/ml.

Level II ALND was performed, and NSLNs were studied after being processed by hematoxylin and eosin staining. The tissue blocks of the NSLN were sectioned with a thickness of 3 microns with an interval of 200 microns.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics were performed using the mean and standard deviation for the numerical variables and percentages for the qualitative variables, both in the total sample and in groups defined by the variable ALND with or without metastatic NSLN. The numerical variables between the two groups of ALND with or without metastatic NSLN were compared by Student’s t-test if the normality of the data was verified (Shapiro-Wilk test) or by the Mann–Whitney test if they were not normal. The qualitative variables were compared between the groups by the Chi-squared test or Fisher’s exact test. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Binary logistic regression models were performed between ALND (with a metastatic/without a metastatic) and each of the variables identified as prognostic of the presence or absence of metastasis in ALND. These models led us to the selection of the variable LogTTL in model 1. The incorporation of variables in the successive models was carried out taking into account the increase in the predictive capacity of the models, their calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow) and the discrimination capacity of the model (Harrell’s C statistic). The final model was selected for its maximum discriminatory capacity, good calibration, along with its parsimony and interpretability.

The probabilities obtained from the binary logistic regression model were used as a diagnostic test of ALND with metastatic NSLNs, and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis was performed for the accuracy of the predictions of the model through sensitivity and specificity. Positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) were also determined from a cutoff point of the probability. The ROC curves of our model and log (CK19) were drawn, and the areas under the ROC curves (AUCs) of the two tests were compared.

The statistical analysis was performed using the IBM SPSS Statistics program version 24 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA).

Results

A total of 824 patients with breast cancer were recruited, of whom 118 required ALND. Of these, 42 (35.6%) presented an ALND with a metastatic NSLN, and 76 (64.4%) had ALND without a metastatic NSLN. The general characteristics of the global population (n = 824) and the study population (n = 118) are found in table 1. No significant differences were found in the general characteristics between patients with ALND with a metastatic NSLN and patients with ALND without a metastatic NSLN.

Table 1 General characteristics of the patients studied 

Mean ± SD o % p

Global population Study population ALND with a metastatic ALND without a metastatic
Age 57.19 ± 12.35 55.98 ± 12.92 53.90 ± 10.62 57.13 ± 13.96 0.296
Age groups
< 50 233/824 (28.3%) 42/118 (35.6%) 15/42 (35.7%) 27/76 (35.5%) 0.419
50-69 443/824 (54%) 55/118 (46.6%) 22/42 (52.4%) 33/76 (43.4%)
≥ 70 146/824 (17.7%) 21/118 (17.8%) 5/42 (11.9%) 16/76 (21.1%)
Menopausal status 523/824 (63.5%) 65/118 (55.1%) 24/42 (57.1%) 41/76 (53.9%) 0.847
Age of menopause 49.18 ± 4.98 48.63 ± 4.86 49.46 ± 4.44 48.15 ± 5.07 0.188
Parity 722/824 (87.6%) 105/118 (89%) 38/42 (90.5%) 67/76 (88.2%) 0.769
Number of births 2.50 ± 1.22 2.48 ± 1.36 2.50 ± 1.22 2.46 ± 1.44 0.675

ALND: axillary lymph node dissection. The comparison of numerical variables between the defined groups was carried out using the Student’s t-test for independent samples or the Mann–Whitney test, if the data did not meet the normality hypothesis (Shapiro–Wilk test). The association between qualitative variables was made using the Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test.

Clinical and anatomopathological characteristics of the tumor according to the presence of metastases in the NSLN are shown in table 2. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups. However, multicentricity was more frequent in ALND with metastatic NSLN (23.8% vs. 10.5%; p = 0.065). The immunohistochemical characteristics of the tumors of the patients studied are shown in table 3. Luminal A tumors were more frequent in patients with ALND with a metastatic NSLN (57.1% vs. 46.1%; p = 0.336).

Table 2 Clinical and anatomopathological characteristics of the tumor according to the presence of metastasis in a NSLN 

Mean ± SD o % p

ALND with a metastatic ALND without a metastatic
Tumor size 53.90 ± 10.62 57.13 ± 13.96 0.296
Tumor size > 2 cm 21/42 (50%) 36/76 (47.4%) 0.850
Histological type
Ductal 30/42 (71.4%) 61/76 (80.3%) 0.161
Lobular 11/42 (26.2%) 10/76 (13.2%)
Others 1/42 (2.4%) 5/76 (6.5%)
Multicentricity 10/42 (23.8%) 8/76 (10.5%) 0.065
Multifocality 4/42 (9.5%) 8/76 (10.5%) 1.000
Lymphovascular invasion 13/42 (30.9%) 26/76 (34.2%) 0.839
Tumor histological grade 0.438
1 8/42 (19.0%) 8/76 (10.5%)
2 20/42 (47.6%) 41/76 (53.9%)
3 14/42 (33.3%) 26/76 (34.2%)
Tumor histological grade (Grouped)
Less (1-2) 28/42 (66.7%) 49/76 (64.4%) 1.000
Higher (3) 14/42 (33.3%) 26/76 (34.2%)
Tubules
1 3/42 (7.1%) 2/76 (2.6%) 0.435
2 10/42 (23.8%) 23/76 (30.3%)
3 29/42 (69.0%) 50/76 (65.8%)
Tubules (Grouped)
Less (1-2) 13/42 (30.9%) 25/76 (32.9%) 0.839
Higher (3) 29/42 (69.0%) 50/76 (65.8%)
Nuclei
1 2/42 (4.8%) 1/76 (1.3%) 0.499
2 18/42 (42.8%) 28/76 (36.8%)
3 22/42 (52.4%) 46/76 (60.5%)
Nuclei (Grouped)
Less (1-2) 20/42 (47.6%) 29/76 (38.1%) 0.435
Higher (3) 22/42 (52.4%) 46/76 (60.5%)
Mitosis
1 23/42 (54.8%) 36/76 (47.4%) 0.286
2 14/42 (33.3%) 21/76 (27.6%)
3 5/42 (11.9%) 18/76 (23.7%)
Mitosis (Grouped)
Less (1-2) 37/42 (88.1%) 57/76 (75%) 0.148
Higher (3) 5/42 (11.9%) 18/76 (23.7%)

ALND: axillary lymph node dissection, NSLN: nonsentinel lymph nodes. The comparison of numerical variables between the defined groups was carried out using the Student’s t-test for independent samples or the Mann-Whitney test, if the data did not meet the normality hypothesis (Shapiro–Wilk test). The association between qualitative variables was made using the Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test.

Table 3 Immunohistochemical profile of the tumor according to the presence of metastasis in a NSLN 

Mean ± SD o %

ALND with a metastatic ALND without a metastatic p
IHC
Luminal A-like 24/42 (57.1%) 35/76 (46.1%) 0.810
Luminal B-like HER2 negative 15/42 (35.7%) 30/76 (39.5%)
Luminal B-like HER2 positive 2/42 (4.8%) 6/76 (7.9%)
HER2 positive nonluminal 0/42 (0%) 1/76 (1.3%)
Triple-negative 1/42 (2.4%) 3/76 (3.9%)
IHC (Grouped)
Luminal A-like 24/42 (57.1%) 35/76 (46.1%) 0.336
No Luminal A-like 18/42 (42.9%) 40/76 (52.6%)
ER 41/42 (97.6%) 72/76 (94.7%) 0.654
PgR 33/42 (78.6%) 66/76 (86.8%) 0.298
Her2 positive 2/42 (4.8%) 7/76 (9.2%) 0.486
Ki 67 (%) (Grouped)
≤ 20 29/42 (69.0%) 43/76 (56.6%) 0.239
> 20 13/42 (31.0%) 32/76 (42.1%)

ALND: axillary lymph node dissection, IHC: immunohistochemical, ER: estrogen receptors, PgR progesterone receptors. The association between qualitative variables was made using the Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test.

When we compared the characteristics of axillary surgery between patients with ALND with a metastatic NSLN and ALND without a metastatic NSLN, we observed that patients with ALND with a metastatic NSLN had more positive SLNs (1.55 ± 0.67 vs. 1.38 ± 0.65; p = 0.116).), greater rate of macrometastasis (92.9% vs. 67.1%; p = 0.001), and a higher TTL (827070 ± 2585266 vs. 353221 ± 912077; p = 0.005) (Table 4).

Table 4 Sentinel node status according to the presence of metastasis in a NSLN 

Mean ± SD o %

ALND with a metastatic ALND without a metastatic p
Numbers of isolated SLNs 1.76 ± 0.79 1.78 ± 0.92 0.834
Numbers of isolated SLNs > 1 24/42 (57.1%) 39/76 (51.3%) 0.569
Positive SLNs 1.55 ± 0,67 1,38 ± 0,65 0.116
Positive SLNs > 1 19/42 (45.2%) 23/76 (30.3%) 0.113
SLN
Micrometastasis 3/42 (7.1%) 25/76 (32.9%) 0.001
Macrometastasis 39/42 (92.9%) 51/76 (67.1%)
TTL 827070 ± 2585266 353221 ± 912077 0.005
Log TTL 5.05 ± 0.98 4.38 ± 1.21 0.005

ALND: axillary lymph node dissection, NSLN: nonsentinel lymph nodes, SLN: sentinel lymph node, TTL: total tumor load. The comparison of numerical variables between the defined groups was carried out using the Student’s t-test for independent samples or the Mann–Whitney test, if the data did not meet the normality hypothesis (Shapiro–Wilk test). The association between qualitative variables was made using the Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test.

The different logistic regression models are reflected in table 5. Multivariate logistic regression showed that log TTL was the factor that best predicted metastasis to a NSLN. The analysis of the ROC curve showed that log (TTL) had an AUC of 0.651 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.552-0.751) (Fig. 1, red line). To set the cutoff point of total CK19 mRNA copy number (i.e., the TTL), the one with the greatest sensitivity and specificity was used, captured in the form of the Youden index. This CK19 mRNA copy number was 7294. This cutoff point had a sensitivity of 93%, a specificity of 37%, a PPV of 44%, and a NPV of 91%.

Table 5 Logistic regression models 

Models Variables Coefficients p OR (IC95%) Calibration (Homer-Lemeshow) p Discrimination capacity of the model (Harrell’s C statistic) IC95%
1 Constant −3.081 0.001 0.878 0.65 (0.56; 0.75)
Log TTL 0.527 0.004 1.70 (1.18; 2.43)
2 Constant −2.897 0.002 0.388 0.68 (0.58; 0.77)
Log TTL 0.549 0.003 1.73 (1.20; 2.50)
IHC −0.581 0.156 0.56 (0.25; 1.25)
3 Constant −2.142 0.038 0.715 0.71 (0.61; 0.81)
Log TTL 0.542 0.004 1.72 (1.18; 2.50)
IHC
Multicentricity
−0.555
−0.878
0.180
0.106
0.57 (0.26; 1.30)
0.42 (0.14; 1.20)
4 Constant −2.508 0.022 0.659 0.75 (0.66; 0.84)
Log TTL 0.660 0.001 1.93 (1.30; 2.90)
IHC −1.186 0.018 0.31 (0.11; 0.82)
Multicentricity PgR −1.104
1.824
0.058
0.008
0.33 (0.11; 1.04)
6.20 (1.62; 23.64)

TTL: total tumor load. IHC: immunohistochemical. PgR progesterone receptors.

Figure 1 The ROC curves. Red line shows the AUC of the TTL log: 0.651 (IC: 0.552-0.751) (p = 0.007). Blue line indicates the AUC of the TTL log, multicenter, IHC (pooled), and progesterone receptor: 0.752 (CI: 0.663-0.841) (p < 0.0005). ROC: receiver operating characteristic, AUC: area under the curve, TTL: total tumor load, IHC: immunohistochemical. 

We correlated the different clinicopathological parameters that were relevant to the prediction of NSLN metastasis with the ROC curve of log (TTL) (Tables 2 and 3). The best AUC was obtained by relating multicentricity and IHC (pooled) to log (TTL). The AUC was 0.752 (95% CI: 0.663-0.552) (Fig. 1 blue line) when incorporating log (TTL) (OR: 1.93; 95% CI: 1.30-2.90), multicentricity (OR: 0.33; 95% CI: 0.11-1.04).

Discussion

Recently, different nomograms based on the TTL of the SLN have been published. The AUC for TTL has varied between studies. Lower AUCs have been described by Teramoto et al. (0.66)19 and Rubio et al. (0.68)20. Other authors, such as Shimazu et al. (0.70)21, Filloppo et al. (0.71)22, Terretano et al. (0.765)17, and Sanguanraksa et al. (0.789)23, present similar figures to ours. Still others have described higher AUCs, such as Nabais et al. (0.805)24 and Fung et al. (0.86)25. We note that we obtained AUCs equivalent to those previously described when we only analyzed TTL19,20. However, we improved the AUC to 0.711 when we added the multicentricity and IHC (pooled) together with the TTL, and this AUC is similar to others previously described17,21-23. Therefore, we believe that clinicopathological factors are of some importance at the time of nomogram design and should be considered even if no statistically significant differences are found among the study population.

Heilmann et al.26 defined a CK19 mRNA copy number cutoff point similar to ours, with a sensitivity (91%) and specificity (61%) similar to what we have described26. However, unlike our work, Heilmann et al.26 combined histological and OSNA techniques for SLN processing, so the CK19 mRNA copy number could be affected. When we observed the reported cutoff points of the TTL of the SLN to predict NSLN metastasis, different authors have reported progressively lower ones15-17. Peg et al.16 in 2013 determined a higher TTL cutoff point, 15,000 copies of CK19 mRNA (sensitivity 76.7%, specificity 55%, PPV 41.1%, and NPV 85.5%). Subsequently, Ambrogio et al.15 defined this cutoff point at 7700 copies of CK19 mRNA (sensitivity 78%, specificity 57%, PPV 50%, and NPV 83%), which is a value similar to that obtained in our study (7294). Finally, in 2017, Terretano et al.17 presented the lowest cut-off point, 2150 copies (sensitivity 94.9%, specificity 51.4%, PPV 46.5%, and NPV 95.8%). Each also reports the sensitivity, specificity, NPV, and PPV of its cutoff point. In our case, with 7294 copies of CK19 mRNA, we defined a sensitivity of 93%, a specificity of 63%, a PPV of 44%, and a NPV of 91%. However, when we added the clinicopathological parameters to the model, we observed a better AUC. This opens an important avenue of research since it establishes the possibility of building statistical models that include clinicopathological parameters to predict metastases in NSLN. The parameters obtained from our ROC curve of TTL are similar to those described by the different authors with different cut-off points15-17. This indicates that no established cut-off point is superior to another, and we should use other parameters to predict NSLN metastasis, which we believe may be certain clinicopathological characteristics.

The influence of clinicopathological characteristics on predicting the risk of metastasis to NSLNs has been described by other authors. Meretoja et al.27 described that HER-2 status and histological and nuclear grade could influence the appearance of NSLN metastasis. Others have described that tumor size is important in NSLN metastasis28-30. In fact, clinicopathological factors have been included in nomograms. For example, Rubio et al.20 included TTL, tumor size, the presence of lymphovascular invasion, HER-2 status, and the number of metastatic SLNs. However, Shimazu et al.21 postulated that nomograms that use various pathological parameters are not practical for intraoperative decisions. We believe that the most important clinicopathological factors can improve the predictive capacity of nomograms and therefore should be considered.

The strongest point of our work is that we have established the basis for determining possible future models that consider clinicopathological factors associated with TTL to improve the predictive capacity for NSLN metastasis. In addition, we have included the fewest number of clinicopathological factors possible to obtain the best AUC, with which we can build future mathematical models that are easy to apply in the clinic. This study does have some limitations, such as its retrospective design, similar to the previous studies, and the small number of patients included. These aspects would be interesting to improve on in future studies.

Conclusions

We believe that clinicopathological factors should be considered to improve the predictive capacity of total CK19 mRNA copy number (i.e., the TTL) of the SLNs in the prognosis of NSLN metastases.

References

1. Garcia-Etienne CA, Mansel RE, Tomatis M, Heil J, Biganzoli L, Ferrari A, et al. Trends in axillary lymph node dissection for early-stage breast cancer in Europe:impact of evidence on practice. Breast. 2019;45:89-96. [ Links ]

2. Krag DN, Anderson SJ, Julian TB, Brown AM, Harlow SP, Costantino JP, et al. Sentinel-lymph-node resection compared with conventional axillary-lymph-node dissection in clinically node-negative patients with breast cancer:overall survival findings from the NSABP B-32 randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11:927-33. [ Links ]

3. Veronesi U, Paganelli G, Galimberti V, Viale G, Zurrida S, Bedoni M, et al. Sentinel-node biopsy to avoid axillary dissection in breast cancer with clinically negative lymph-nodes. Lancet. 1997;349:1864-7. [ Links ]

4. Tsujimoto M, Nakabayashi K, Yoshidome K, Kaneko T, Iwase T, Akiyama F, et al. One-step nucleic acid amplification for intraoperative detection of lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:4807-16. [ Links ]

5. Brambilla T, Fiamengo B, Tinterri C, Testori A, Grassi MM, Sciarra A, et al. One-step nucleic acid amplification in breast cancer sentinel lymph node:a single institutional experience and a short review. Front Med (Lausanne). 2015;2:37. [ Links ]

6. Chaudhry A, Williams S, Cook J, Jenkins M, Sohail M, Calder C, et al. The real-time intra-operative evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer patients using One Step Nucleic Acid Amplification (OSNA) and implications for clinical decision-making. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2014;40:150-7. [ Links ]

7. Giuliano AE, Hunt KK, Ballman KV, Beitsch PD, Whitworth PW, Blumencranz PW, et al. Axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection in women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis:a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2011;305:569-75. [ Links ]

8. Glechner A, Wöckel A, Gartlehner G, Thaler K, Strobelberger M, Griebler U, et al. Sentinel lymph node dissection only versus complete axillary lymph node dissection in early invasive breast cancer:a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49:812-25. [ Links ]

9. Galimberti V, Cole BF, Zurrida S, Viale G, Luini A, Veronesi P, et al. Axillary dissection versus no axillary dissection in patients with sentinel-node micrometastases (IBCSG 23-01):a phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:297-305. [ Links ]

10. Ohi Y, Umekita Y, Sagara Y, Rai Y, Yotsumoto D, Matsukata A, et al. Whole sentinel lymph node analysis by a molecular assay predicts axillary node status in breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2012;107:1239-43. [ Links ]

11. van la Parra RF, Peer PG, Ernst MF, Bosscha K. Meta-analysis of predictive factors for non-sentinel lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients with a positive SLN. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2011;37:290-9. [ Links ]

12. Van Zee KJ, Manasseh DM, Bevilacqua JL, Boolbol SK, Fey JV, Tan LK, et al. A nomogram for predicting the likelihood of additional nodal metastases in breast cancer patients with a positive sentinel node biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2003;10:1140-51. [ Links ]

13. Houvenaeghel G, Nos C, Giard S, Mignotte H, Esterni B, Jacquemier J, et al. A nomogram predictive of non-sentinel lymph node involvement in breast cancer patients with a sentinel lymph node micrometastasis. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2009;35:690-5. [ Links ]

14. Mittendorf EA, Hunt KK, Boughey JC, Bassett R, Degnim AC, Harrell R, et al. Incorporation of sentinel lymph node metastasis size into a nomogram predicting nonsentinel lymph node involvement in breast cancer patients with a positive sentinel lymph node. Ann Surg. 2012;255:109-15. [ Links ]

15. Deambrogio C, Castellano I, Paganotti A, Zorini EO, Corsi F, Bussone R, et al. A new clinical cut-off of cytokeratin 19 mRNA copy number in sentinel lymph node better identifies patients eligible for axillary lymph node dissection in breast cancer. J Clin Pathol. 2014;67:702-6. [ Links ]

16. Peg V, Espinosa-Bravo M, Vieites B, Vilardell F, Antúnez JR, de Salas MS, et al. Intraoperative molecular analysis of total tumor load in sentinel lymph node:a new predictor of axillary status in early breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013;139:87-93. [ Links ]

17. Terrenato I, D'Alicandro V, Casini B, Perracchio L, Rollo F, De Salvo L, et al. A cut-off of 2150 cytokeratin 19 mRNA copy number in sentinel lymph node may be a powerful predictor of non-sentinel lymph node status in breast cancer patients. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0171517. [ Links ]

18. Senkus E, Kyriakides S, Ohno S, Penault-Llorca F, Poortmans P, Rutgers E, et al. Primary breast cancer:ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2015;26 Suppl 5:v8-30. [ Links ]

19. Teramoto A, Shimazu K, Naoi Y, Shimomura A, Shimoda M, Kagara N, et al. One-step nucleic acid amplification assay for intraoperative prediction of non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients with sentinel lymph node metastasis. Breast. 2014;23:579-85. [ Links ]

20. Rubio IT, Espinosa-Bravo M, Rodrigo M, Amparo Viguri Diaz M, Hardisson D, Sagasta A, et al. Nomogram including the total tumoral load in the sentinel nodes assessed by one-step nucleic acid amplification as a new factor for predicting nonsentinel lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014;147:371-80. [ Links ]

21. Shimazu K, Sato N, Ogiya A, Sota Y, Yotsumoto D, Ishikawa T, et al. Intraoperative nomograms, based on one-step nucleic acid amplification, for prediction of non-sentinel node metastasis and four or more axillary node metastases in breast cancer patients with sentinel node metastasis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25:2603-11. [ Links ]

22. Di Filippo F, Giannarelli D, Bouteille C, Bernet L, Cano R, Cunnick G, et al. Elaboration of a nomogram to predict non sentinel node status in breast cancer patients with positive sentinel node, intra-operatively assessed with one step nucleic acid amplification method. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2015;34:136. [ Links ]

23. Sa-Nguanraksa D, O-Charoenrat E, Kulprom A, Samarnthai N, Lohsiriwat V, Nimpoonsri K, et al. Nomogram to predict non-sentinel lymph node status using total tumor load determined by one-step nucleic acid amplification:first report from Thailand. Breast Cancer. 2019;26:471-7. [ Links ]

24. Nabais C, Figueiredo J, Lopes P, Martins M, Araújo A. Total tumor load assessed by one-step nucleic acid amplification assay as an intraoperative predictor for non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in breast cancer. Breast. 2017;32:33-6. [ Links ]

25. Fung V, Kohlhardt S, Vergani P, Zardin GJ, Williams NR. Intraoperative prediction of the two axillary lymph node macrometastases threshold in patients with breast cancer using a one?step nucleic acid cytokeratin?19 amplification assay. Mol Clin Oncol. 2017;7:755-62. [ Links ]

26. Heilmann T, Mathiak M, Hofmann J, Mundhenke C, van Mackelenbergh M, Alkatout I, et al. Intra-operative use of one-step nucleic acid amplification (OSNA) for detection of the tumor load of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer patients. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2013;139:1649-55. [ Links ]

27. Meretoja TJ, Leidenius MH, HeikkiläPS, Boross G, Sejben I, Regitnig P, et al. International multicenter tool to predict the risk of nonsentinel node metastases in breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012;104:1888-96. [ Links ]

28. Degnim AC, Reynolds C, Pantvaidya G, Zakaria S, Hoskin T, Barnes S, et al. Nonsentinel node metastasis in breast cancer patients:assessment of an existing and a new predictive nomogram. Am J Surg. 2005;190:543-50. [ Links ]

29. Ozmen V, Karanlik H, Cabioglu N, Igci A, Kecer M, Asoglu O, et al. Factors predicting the sentinel and non-sentinel lymph node metastases in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2006;95:1-6. [ Links ]

30. Joseph KA, El-Tamer M, Komenaka I, Troxel A, Ditkoff BA, Schnabel F. Predictors of nonsentinel node metastasis in patients with breast cancer after sentinel node metastasis. Arch Surg. 2004;139:648-51. [ Links ]

FundingThe authors declare have no commercial or financial relationship with any sponsor, or direct professional relationship with it.

Ethical disclosures

Protection of human and animal subjects. The authors declare that no experiments were performed on humans or animals for this study.

Confidentiality of data. The authors declare that they have followed the protocols of their work center on the publication of patient data.

Right to privacy and informed consent. The authors declare that no patient data appear in this article.

Received: February 12, 2021; Accepted: May 23, 2021

* Correspondence: José A. García-Mejido Valme University Hospital. Avda. Bellavista S/N. CP: 41014. Seville, Spain E-mail: jgmejido@us.es

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that does not exist an conflict of interest.

Creative Commons License Instituto Nacional de Cardiología Ignacio Chávez. Published by Permanyer. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license