SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.10 número2Introgresión de eventos transgénicos y secuencias acompañantes en maíces mexicanosEstudio etnobotánico de las bromelias útiles (Bromeliaceae) en el Valle de Juchipila, Zacatecas, México índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Ecosistemas y recursos agropecuarios

versión On-line ISSN 2007-901Xversión impresa ISSN 2007-9028

Ecosistemas y recur. agropecuarios vol.10 no.2 Villahermosa may./ago. 2023  Epub 22-Sep-2023

https://doi.org/10.19136/era.a10n2.3528 

Scientific articles

Mineral content of shrubs from goat’s production systems in two seasons in an arid zone

Contenido mineral de arbustos en sistemas de producción caprino en dos temporadas en una zona árida

Tomás Rivas-García1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1035-4112

Eduardo Alberto Toyes-Vargas2 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0579-7552

José Luis Espinoza-Villavicencio3 
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8609-8325

Alejandro Palacios-Espinosa3 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4726-4164

Bernardo Murillo-Amador2  * 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9489-4054

1Universidad Autónoma Chapingo. Carretera Federal México-Texcoco Km 38.5. CP. 56230. Texcoco, Estado de México, México.

2Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas del Noroeste, S.C. Programa de Agricultura en Zonas Áridas. Av. Instituto Politécnico Nacional No. 195. CP. 23096. Colonia Playa Palo de Santa Rita Sur. La Paz, Baja California Sur, México.

3Universidad Autónoma de Baja California Sur. Departamento Académico de Ciencia Animal y Conservación del Hábitat. Carretera al Sur km 5.5. CP23080. Apartado Postal 19-B, La Paz, Baja California Sur, México.


Abstract

Minerals are needed in the diet of animals for maintenance, development, and reproduction. The aim was to determine mineral content of shrubs consumed by goats in an arid area from three production systems, during wet and dry seasons. The leaves, pods, stems, or flowers of 34 shrubs and one supplement were sampled manually and analyzed Ca, Mg, K, Na, P, N, Fe, Mn, Zn, Cu, B, and Cl. The shrubs showed enough K Ca, K, Mg, Na, B, Cl and N for goat requirements for all production systems; however, P was lower. The Zn, Cu, Fe, and Mn contents were lower in all shrubs. The results suggest that in the study area more non-legumes could be used in the goat diet to enhance nutritional value because of their higher mineral content. Considering the status of mineral content, 58% of all minerals had higher content in the semi-intensive production system, and possibly, it is the best production system. Adequate values of mineral content 58% of all minerals had higher content in the semi-intensive production system, and possibly, it is the best production system. Adequate values of mineral content were found in L. brevipes, T. lobaeformis and A. barclayana in the semi-intensive system, while in the extensive system the mineral content was of good nutritional quality with S. thurberi and C. gayana for the intensive system. The 35 shrubs showed differences among macrominerals and the nutritional quantity/quality of these minerals for goats varied depending on production system, season, and types of shrubs.

Key words: Goat; nutrition; minerals; forage; arid zones

Resumen

Los minerales son necesarios en la dieta de los animales para su mantenimiento, desarrollo y reproducción. El objetivo fue determinar el contenido de minerales en arbustos que consumen las cabras en una zona árida en tres sistemas de producción, durante las estaciones húmeda y seca. Las hojas, vainas tallos o flores y un suplemento se muestrearon y se determinó en 34 arbustos Ca, Mg, K, Na, P, N, Fe, Mn, Zn, Cu, B y Cl. Los arbustos en los sistemas de producción mostraron suficiente K, Ca, K, Mg, Na, B, Cl y N para las necesidades de las cabras; sin embargo, el contenido de P fue bajo. El contenido de Zn, Cu, Fe y Mn fue menor en todos los arbustos. Los resultados sugieren que, en la zona de estudio es posible utilizar forrajes no leguminosos en la dieta para mejorar su valor nutricional, debido a su contenido mayor en minerales. El sistema de producción semi-intensivo mostró que, el 58% de los minerales fue mayor en este sistema, considerado como el mejor. El contenido mineral en L. brevipes, T. lobaeformis y A. barclayana en el semi-intensivo fueron adecuados para las cabras, mientras que en el extensivo el contenido mineral fue de buena calidad nutricional con S. thurberi y C. gayana para el sistema intensivo. Los arbustos mostraron diferencias entre los macrominerales y la cantidad/calidad nutricional de estos para las cabras difiere en función del sistema de producción, la estación y los tipos de arbustos.

Palabras clave: Cabras; nutrición; minerales; forrajes; zonas áridas

Introduction

The ruminants are renowned for being Hardy and being able to survive in harsh conditions or with little water or even saline water (Vosooghi-Postindoz et al. 2018). Nevertheless, despite their adaptability they require inorganic elements or minerals in their diets for development, maintenance, reproduction, and survival. To achieve the minimum required minerals grazing ruminants in the rangelands require to get their elements from the plants they consume (Stewart et al. 2021). Inorganic elements are needed in gram amounts are known as macrominerals and this group includes Ca, P, Na, Cl, K, Mg and S (Kumar et al. 2020). Macrominerals are essential for bone growth as well as in other tissues and are part of bodily fluids. The minerals that are needed in milligram quantities are known as trace minerals or micro-minerals (Nair et al. 2022). The typical micro minerals are Fe, F, Mo, Co, Mn, Se, Cu, Zn, and I (Arthington and Ranches 2021). The goat production occurs in areas of low income where milk and meat products derived from goats are essential in providing a sufficient nutritional diet for the poor (Miller and Lu 2019). In the Peninsula of Baja California, Mexico as in other arid areas of Mexico, the success goat production depends on various factors including low cost of production, an acceptable market price for meat and cheeses, and a limited milk yield for cheese production (Mellado et al. 2020). The majority employing the old-style extensive system of releasing goats into the field to allow them to roam for their food (Cousins et al. 2020). The use of modern systems is lacking since only a few farmers have the capital resources to carry out the intensive or semi-intensive systems (Costantini et al. 2021). The goats are let loose to roam the range to forage and in so doing they consume local plants under the typical pasture system (Singh et al. 2020). However, often during the year especially in arid climates such as in the Peninsula of Baja California the consumed shrubs do not meet the minimum mineral nutritional guidelines of the goats. The lack of adequate minerals at both the macro and trace levels can lead to reproductive failure and low milk production (Kumar et al. 2020). The ruminants need inorganic elements for metabolic health and reproduction in addition to protein and fiber, although excessive amounts of certain minerals can be toxic (Langova et al. 2020).

The importance of macrominerals and trace elements in the diet of ruminants from shrubs in the rangeland has been reported and has been attributed to inadequacies in the forages due to mineral deficiencies in the soils, thereby causing lower production as well as reproductive and developmental problems (Stewart et al. 2021). The lack of macro and micro minerals affects ruminants that graze in the rangelands worldwide, macro-elements such as Na, Mg, S, P and Ca, as well as micro-minerals such as Cu, Mn, Zn, Co, Se, and I (Kubkomawa 2019). The number of inorganic elements in the forage from the rangeland has been found to be related to the quantities of the elements in the soils (McKenna et al. 2022). The mineral content of plants tend to vary with plant species, soil fertility, phenological stage of plant, wáter availability, plant tissue (leaves, pods, stems), tissue age, climate, and fertilizer application (Mlaza et al. 2022). In arid regions, resources are limited and hence sources must be used efficiently (Mihiretu et al. 2019). The grazing ruminant nutrition in terms of meeting its mineral needs is complex since it in volves three separate components: (1) the animal, (2) the plants it consumes and (3) the mineral content of the soil (Arthington and Ranches 2021). The ruminant dietary intake of minerals is not only affected by climate but by its own specific genetic variability, growth stage, ruminant preferences and plant age and availability. The lack of macro minerals and trace elements in forages of grazing ruminants due to por mineral content in soils has been long known to affect ruminant nutrition and milk production (Henry et al. 2018). In this research, we hypothesized that macro and minerals of shrubs (legumes and non-legumes) change through the most evident seasons of the year, the dry season, and the wet season and among production systems. The aim of this study was to determinethe mineral content of shrubs of goat diets used in three production system during two seasonal periods (dry and wet) from non-legumes and legumes shrubs in a semiarid region of Mexico.

Materials and methods

Study región

The study was carried-out in three arid areas of the Peninsula of Baja California, Mexico with creole goats under three different production systems, extensive, intensive, and semi-intensive.

Extensive system

This system of production is located at 25° 19’ 51.75” N and 111° 25’ 411.84” W and 160 masl. The temperature averages are 22.1 °C and 18.7 °C, during the dry and wet seasons, respectively, with anual average yearly rainfall of 180 mm (INEGI 2006). The goats are milked in the early morning by hand and afterwards, the animals are released into the rangeland, where they travel long distances in search of food sources, which are exclusively plants components. Some health practices are carried out when required on animals, which are mostly curative in nature than preventative. In the afternoon before sunset, the goats returned voluntarily to the farmer. There was no reproductive management or breeding control of the animals. Any genetic improvement is limited to the Exchange of stallions with local goat farmers in the area for breeding. The goats consumed pods, flowers, and leaves of different shrubs species throughout the year due to seasonal availability. The goats consumed non-legumes and legumes species (Table 1).

Table 1 Legumes and non-legumes species consumed by goats by each production system (extensive, semi-intensive and intensive). 

Extensive Semi-intensive Intensive
Legumes Non-legumes Legumes Non-legumes Legumes Non-legumes
Cercidum floridum Benth. Ex A. Gray subsp. Peninsulare (Rose) Carter Bursera microphyla Gray, Ferocactus spp. Acacia far- nesiana (L.) Willd. Tilhonia lobaeformis (Jacq.) Cass. Medicago sativa L. Pennisetum sp. L.
Lysiloma candida Brandegee. Pachycereus pringlei (S. Wats) Brit. & Rose. Cicer arietinum L. Cynodon dactylon L. Cicer arietinum L. Zea mays L.
Acacia peninsularis (Britt. and Rose) Standley Jatropha cinerea (C.G. Ortega) Muell. Arg. In D.C. Atriplex barclayana Benth, Phaseolus vulgaris L.
Cercidium microphyllum (Torr.) Rose and Johnston Ruellia californica (Rose) I. M. Jhtn. Chloris gayana Kunth,
Acacia brandegeana Opuntia cholla Weber Cenchrus ciliaris L.
Cercidium X sonorae Rose and Johnston Celtis reticulata Torr. Amarantus palmeri L.
Prosopis palmeri S. Wats. Lycium brevipes Benth., Zea mays L.
Pithecellobium confine Standl, Phrygilanthus sonorae S. Wats Convolvulus arvensis L.
Acacia farnesiana (L.) Willd. Lippia palmeri L.,
Jatropha cuneata Wiggins and Rollins
Fouquieria diguetii (Van Tieghem) I. M. Jhtn.
Stenocereus thurberi (Engelm.) Buxbaum

Intensive system

This system is located at 25° 11’ 55” N and 111° 42’ 07” W. at 50 masl. The average temperatures are 22.1 °C (dry season) and 18.7 °C (wet season) with average yearly rainfall of 98 mm (INEGI 2006). In the farms with this system, goats are kept in confinement and fed hayed forages and concentrates grain freely available. The mechanical milking is done once a day where there is professional technical advice, to take care of proper control of animal health. The management includes separation of calves from the dairy herd, where they are only allowed to take colostrum the first day, afterwards the goats are separated from the mother and fed milk supplements. The composition of the diet of goats of this system consisted of different plant species throughout the year, consuming straw of legumes, straw of non-legumes (Table 1) and a dairy base concentrate.

Semi-intensive system

This system is located at 24° 57’ 09” N and 111° 38’ 25” W, 48 m.a.s.l. The averages temperatures during the dry and wet season are 22.1° C and 18.7° C, respectively, with yearly average rainfall of 98 mm (INEGI 2006). This type of system combines the two previous systems, most food intake is from rangeland grazing, but it is also supplemented with hayed forages such as Medicago sativa. The goats are hand milked in the morning like previous systems and released into the rangeland until noon and upon returning they received supplemental feeding with hayed forages, grazing times are determined by the goat farmer. The goats consumed leaves, pods, or stems of shrubs species (non-legumes and legumes) (Table 1).

Plants and shrubs sampling

The plant species and shrubs consumed by goats in the three production systems were collected during two periods. These samples were grouped according to two periods (wet and dry seasons). In the extensive and semi-intensive systems, after milking, lactating goats were released to the rangeland or to agricultural areas (semi-intensive), where they walked the trails searching for food. Three persons were behind the goats and collected the samples of plants or shrubs consumed by the goats. The samples (three) of the parts consumed were taken when most goats chose a particular pant or shrub for consumption. In the semi-intensive system, samples from the diet added with the hayed forages and additions were collected from the feeders and analyzed. The samples were placed in paper bags and then carried to the laboratory at Centro de Investigaciones Biologicas del Noroeste, S.C. to determine mineral content. In the intensive system, hayed forages and dairy base concentrates were sampled from the feeders.

Mineral analysis

The parts or tissues collected from plants or shrubs were dried in an oven (HTP-80) at 70°C until constant weight. The dry material was milled in a mixer (Braun 4-041 Model KSM-2). The Na, Fe, Mn, Zn, Ca, Mg, K and Cu contents were quantified by atomic absorption spectrophotometry (Shimadzu AA-660, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) after digestion with H2SO4, HNO3, and HClO4 (1:10:4). The P content was estimated colorimetrically by measuring at 660 nm the specific blue colour of the phosphomolybdate complex from the same extract. The total N content was determined by Kjeldahl digestion utilizing a sulphuric acid and salicylic acid mixture with Cu and K2SO4 such as catalysts followed by NH+4 estimation using the Nessler calorimetric method. The chemical composition of all plants or shrubs was described previously (Toyes-Vargas et al. 2013a, Toyes-Vargas et al. 2013b, Toyes-Vargas et al. 2014).

Statistical análisis

The multivariate and univariate analysis of variance (MANOVA and ANOVA) of three ways of classification, considering seasons, shrubs, and production systems as study factors for a completely randomized design were performed. The MANOVA was used to determine if ANOVA results are not random or false positives and, in these terms, all differences of minerals among factors (shrubs, production systems, seasons and plant types) are due to effect of each factor (Johnson 1998). In the ANOVA analysis ( Yijkl =μ+ i+ βj+λk+ εijkl , the interaction was not included because there not exist synergism or interference among factors under study (Sokal and Rohlf 1998). The data collection from shrubs depended on the production systems, and the alimentary preferences of goats, therefore, the result was an incomplete design in terms of determining the factors and plant types. The plant type’s factor was analyzed separately to determine the differences of mineral content among them. In all cases, differences among means were considered significant at p < 0.05. Means comparison were done by Tukey’s HSD test (p= 0.05). Statistica v. 10.0 (StatSoft 2011) was used for all analyses.

Results

Macrominerals

The MANOVA analysis indicated significant differences of macro and micro minerals among shrubs (Wilks = 0.000000000034, F = 38.16, p = 0.000001), production systems (Wilks = 0.130, F = 16.97, p = 0.000001), seasons (Wilks = 0.291, F = 23.29, p = 0.000001) and plant types (Wilks = 0.478, F = 13.68, p = 0.000001). The N content did not show significant differences among production systems; however, the N content from highest to lowest values was as follows semi-intensive>intensive>extensive systems (Table 2). The significant differences were observed between seasons, plant types and shrubs. The N content was higher during wet season (Table 3 and 4). The differences between shrubs showed that T. lobaeformis had the highest N and O. cholla the lowest (Table 5). The Ca content showed significant differences among shrubs, systems, seasons, and plant types. The Ca content was higher in extensive system, followed by semi-intensive and intensive, respectively. In addition, Ca in shrubs was higher during dry season and in non-legumes species (Tables 3 and 4). The average of Ca between seasons and plant types was higher than 10.0 g kg dry-1 basis; all shrubs with exception of Pennisetum sp. Had enough quantities to satisfy necessities of an adult goat (Table 5). The Mg content showed significant differences between shrubs, systems, seasons, and plant types. The Mg content was higher in plants and shrubs of the semi-intensive system and higher in those shrubs collected during dry season and in non-legumes. The Mg between shrubs indicated that Tilhonia lobaeformis collected in the semi-intensive system showed the highest Mg while Phrygilantus sonorae collected in the extensive system showed the lowest. The P content did not show significant differences among production systems and seasons; however, exhibited highest content in the diet from the intensive system and during dry season. The P showed significant differences among plant types and shrubs being higher in non-legumes species. Three species, Acacia brandegeana, Pennisetum sp. and S. thurberi had the highest K while A. peninsularis, C. sonorae and J. cinerea showed the lowest. The Na content was higher in plants and shrubs of the semi-intensive system and during the dry season; however, non-significant differences between production systems and seasons were found. The non-legumes had the highest Na.

Table 2 Differences between production systems in an arid area in the macro and micro mineral content (g or mg kg-1 dry-weight) of shrubs consumed by goats. 

Macro and micro minerals Extensive Intensive Semi- intensive Significance level
Ca (g kg-1) 14.69a 6.64c 9.44b ***
Mg (g kg-1) 4.64b 4.44b 6.88a ***
K (g kg-1) 21.18a 39.65a 29.36a ns
Na (g kg-1) 2.75a 1.95a 4.41a ns
Fe (mg kg-1) 53.38c 81.76b 124.30a ***
Mn (mg kg-1) 8.27c 9.42b 12.92a ***
Zn (mg kg-1) 2.67b 2.87ab 3.17a ***
Cu (mg kg-1) 4.20a 4.68a 4.28a ns
B (mg kg-1) 254.82c 700.33b 910.91a ***
Cl (mg kg-1) 510.45a 400.22b 504.82 ab ***
P (g kg-1) 1.61c 2.29a 2.15b ***
N (g kg-1) 22.80a 19.23a 23.71a ns

ns = Not significant; *** Significant at 0.001 probability level. Means followed by the same letter in the same row are not significantly different (Tukey HSD P = 0.05).

Table 3 Differences between two seasons (wet and dry) in an arid area in the macro and micro mineral content (g or mg kg-1 dry-weight) of shrubs consumed by goats. 

Macro and micro minerals Wet Dry Significance level
Ca (g kg-1) 11.77b 11.79a ***
Mg (g kg-1) 4.78 b 5.59 a ***
K (g kg-1) 24.71a 28.61a ns
Na (g kg-1) 2.81a 3.28a ns
Fe (mg kg-1) 68.52b 86.24a ***
Mn (mg kg-1) 8.57b 10.78a ***
Zn (mg kg-1) 2.57a 3.08a ns
Cu (mg kg-1) 2.53 b 5.85a **
B (mg kg-1) 87.80b 886.45a ***
Cl (mg kg-1) 885.19a 146.36b ***
P (g kg-1) 1.92a 1.85a Ns
N (g kg-1) 24.80a 20.32b ***

ns = Not significant; *** Significant at 0.001 probability level. Means followed by the same letter in the same row are not significantly different (Tukey HSD P = 0.05).

Table 4 Differences between two types of plants (legumes and non-legumes) in the macro and micro mineral content (g or mg kg-1 dry-weight) of shrubs consumed by goats in an arid area. 

Macro and micro minerals Legumes Non-legumes Significance level
Ca (g kg-1) 10.17b 13.35a ***
Mg (g kg-1) 3.95 b 6.33 a ***
K (g kg-1) 23.98b 29.3a ***
Na (g kg-1) 1.19b 4.72a ns
Fe (mg kg-1) 72.05ª 83.32a ***
Mn (mg kg-1) 7.05b 12.15a ***
Zn (mg kg-1) 3.01a 2.69a ns
Cu (mg kg-1) 4.82a 3.86a **
B (mg kg-1) 437.34a 586.27a ns
Cl (mg kg-1) 213.64b 732.22a ***
P (g kg-1) 1.82a 1.94a ns
N (g kg-1) 26.09a 19.13b ***

ns = Not significant; *** Significant at 0.001 probability level. Means followed by the same letter in the same row are not significantly different (Tukey HSD P = 0.05).

Table 5 Differences between shrubs consumed by goats in an arid area in the acro and micro mineral content (g or mg kg-1 dry-weight). 

Shrubs Ca (g kg-1) Mg (g kg-1) K (g kg-1) Na (g kg-1) Fe (mg kg-1) Mn (mg kg-1) Zn (mg kg-1) Cu (mg kg-1) B (mg kg-1) Cl (mg kg-1) P (g kg-1) N (g kg-1)
Pennisetum sp. 0.89m 2.36mn 52.75a 0.20j 17.04fg 12.84b 3.49bcdef 5.73bcdef 1167.8c 288.59ghi 2.28def 7.87n
Zea mays 1.42m 3.94hijklm 23.75fghijk 0.49ij 149.59cde 11.1bcd 4.6abcd 4.41cdefg 280.48defg 212.54ghi 2.9ab 11.34mn
Chloris gayana 1.94lm 7.27def 20.41jklm 2.78def 477.56a 30.38a 2.99defghi 2.96fg 3.12g 575.72cdefg 1.7efghij 19.53fghijklm
Cenchrus ciliaris 2.65lm 2.73mn 27.31defghij 0.58hij 28.99efg 12.66bc 2.34efghi 2.14fg 1.21g 695.41cdefg 1.79efghij 13.52klmn
Dairy base concentrate 3.36lm 2.95mn 25.12defghijk 2.92def 63.65efg 7.16defgh 2.51efghi 2.81fg 2.28g 597.18cdefg 2.02defg 18.87hijklm
Cercidum floridum 4.94jklm 3.80hijklmn 29.14defghi 1.16ghij 13.63fg 4.49fgh 5.75a 9.07ab 76.67efg 3.83i 2.3bcdef 30.35 abcde
Cynodon dactylon 5.52jklm 5.09fghijk 23.13fghijklm 2.18fg 272.27bc 28.42a 3.64abcdef 5.55bcdefg 848.22cdef 85.57i 1.34hijkl 12.0mn
Ferocactus spp. 5.72ijklm 4.03hijklm 20.51jklm 0.10j 11.45fg 4.47fgh 1.71efghi 1.91fg 2.88g 261.82ghi 1.98defgh 15.98hijklm
Cercidium x sonorae 6.13ijklm 5.21fghij 11.75m 0.43ij 120.59cdefg 7.46cdefgh 4.71abc 6.7abcde 75.79efg 18.91i 3.21a 28.78efg
Stenocereus thurberi 7.02ijklm 6.33efg 45.34a 0.17j 28.06efg 27.48a 3.29bcdefghi 4.44cdefg 864.4cd 161.04ghi 2.37bcde 13.13lmn
Cercidium microphyllum 7.53ijklm 3.77hijklmn 19.33jklm 0.30ij 38.14efg 5.0efgh 3.97abcde 4.75bcdefg 82.12efg 29.83i 2.37bcde 24.24fghij
Medicago sativa 7.99ijkl 4.31hijkl 40.83c 2.55fg 114.01efg 8.4cdefg 3.18defghi 4.31cdefg 364.96defg 555.21efg 2.47bcd 27.7fg
Prosopis palmeri 8.18hijkl 3.69jklmn 21.59jklm 0.48ij 28.48efg 3.96h 2.99efghi 3.24fg 438.97defg 121.85ghi 1.61ghij 29.19e
Convolvulus arvensis 8.83hijkl 5.48fgh 31.07defgh 1.20ghij 168.53cd 10.25bcde 3.53bcdef 4.98bcdefg 798.67cdef 520.79efgh 2.25def 23.03fghijk
Acacia farnesiana 9.98hijk 3.05mn 13.98m 0.50ij 68.79efg 9.08cdef 2.53efghi 4.4cdefg 150.0efg 148.29ghi 1.53hijkl 30.33e
Atriplex barclayana 11.19ghijk 4.55ghijkl 53.40a 23.97a 29.07efg 11.03bcd 1.93efghi 4.4cdefg 3418.01a 838.25cde 1.8efghi 21.95 fghijkl
Lysiloma candida 11.36ghijk 3.06klmn 31.63cdefgh 0.50ij 26.67efg 3.1h 3.08defghi 6.91abc 302.19defg 2.87i 1.46hijkl 19.84fghijklm
Pachycereus pringlei 11.37ghijk 9.51cd 39.06cd 0.11j 29.16efg 28.79a 3.14defghi 4.42cdefg 353.39defg 48.32i 2.81abc 13.91klmn
Amarantus palmeri 12.11ghijk 10.34bc 37.87cde 3.96d 51.18efg 11.7bcd 1.69efghi 2.13fg 3.54g 1057.6bcd 2.41bcde 26.77fgh
Acacia brandegeana 12.32ghi 2.48mn 17.93jklm 0.35ij 108.24efg 7.34defgh 2.58efghi 6.53bcde 228.78efg 98.46i 1.19kl 23.11fghij
Phrygilanthus sonorae 13.16ghi 1.62n 23.65fghijklm 0.30ij 15.7fg 3.43h 2.87efghi 3.89cdefg 350.81defg 14.16i 0.84l 15.41ijklmn
Cicer arietinum 13.36ghi 6.96ef 22.87fghijklm 3.29de 64.25efg 7.54cdefgh 2.17efghi 4.29cdefg 2296.63b 4.97i 1.39hijkl 10.33 mn
Pithecellobium confine 13.42ghi 3.16klmn 20.82jklm 1.68fgh 34.82efg 6.11efgh 3.01defghi 3.86cdefg 495.0defg 492.99efghi 1.33hijkl 24.46 fghi
Fouquieria diguetii 13.58defghi 3.15klmn 13.09m 3.28de 11.6fg 4.56fgh 1.07hi 1.18g 8.77g 353.41efghi 1.61ghijk 15.3ijklmn
Celtis reticulata 16.70cdef 5.61efgh 13.23m 0.17j 21.76efg 8.08cdefgh 0.94i 2.22fg 6.31g 90.46i 1.37hijkl 28.1 efg
Tilhonia lobaeformis 18.67cde 19.0a 41.0bc 0.28ij 59.61efg 7.86cdefgh 4.7abc 4.48cdefg 848.87cd 744.38cdef 3.43a 38.65 a
Lippia palmeri 19.58bcde 5.14fghijk 18.71jklm 2.56defg 21.59efg 4.38fgh 1.7efghi 2.01fg 7.85g 398.81efghi 1.42hijkl 19.19 fghijklm
Phaseolus vulgaris 20.48bcd 11.3bc 35.54cdef 3.03def 117.95cdefg 9.92bcdef 1.6efghi 5.25bcdefg 2281.3b 37.96i 2.26def 10.78 mn
Jatropha cuneata 22.75bc 5.47fghi 13.4 m 16.73c 13.99fg 12.43bcd 1.28ghi 1.59fg 9.52g 1210.82bc 1.13kl 17.97 hijklm
Acacia peninsularis 23.73bc 4.32ghijkl 11.06m 0.29ij 24.65efg 7.23defgh 2.92efghi 10.9a 56.62efg 18.7i 1.36hijkl 19.86 fghijklm
Bursera microphyla 24.79bc 3.15klmn 12.93m 2.56defg 18.95efg 7.87cdefgh 1.42fghi 1.5fg 9.31g 716.2cdefg 1.59ghijkl 19.27 fghijklm
Jatropha cinerea 26.65ab 7.56de 11.75m 21.0b 424.63ab 24.15a 3.0defghi 5.13bcdefg 821.67cdef 230.62ghi 1.4hijkl 14.59 jklmn
Opuntia cholla 27.09ab 12.46b 28.75defghi 0.22ij 12.85fg 12.21bcd 2.17efghi 4.73bcdefg 610.81cdefg 41.08i 1.26hijkl 6.1 n
Ruellia californica b 33.51a 10.14bc 35.3cdef 1.57fghi 18.27efg 3.41h 1.82efghi 2.11fg 8.77g 1654.4b 1.3hijkl 28.75 efg
Lycium brevipes 33.83a 6.14efg 25.18defghijk 23.06a 22.36efg 7.42cdefgh 1.04hi 2.29fg 4.57g 7814.03a 1.19hijkl 30.75 ab
Significance level *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** Significant at 0.001 probability level. Means followed by the same letter in the same column are not significantly different (Tukey HSD P = 0.05).

The Na was higher in A. barclayana and L. brevipes, both collected in the extensive system where three cacti species, Ferocactus spp., P. pringleii and S. thurberii, showed the lowest Na. The Cl content showed significant differences among systems, seasons, plant types and shrubs. The Cl was higher in extensive system, during wet season and in non-legumes. The Cl was higher in L. brevipes followed by R. californica while L. candida and C. floridum had the lowest Cl. Two species, L. brevipes and A. barclayana showed higher Na and Cl content than other shrubs; in addition, A. barclayana showed higher K content. The P content contrasted from highest to lowest values as follows intensive>semi-intensive>extensive systems. The P content was higher at wet season and non-legumes; however, no significant differences between seasons and plant types were found. The P content showed significant differences among shrubs, being higher in T. lobaeformis and C. x sonorae while the lowest content was in P. sonorae.

Microminerals

The Zn content showed significant differences among production systems and shrubs. The Zn was higher in semi-intensive system (Table 2). The Zn content was higher during dry season (Table 3) and legumes species (Table 4); however, no differences between seasons and plant types were found. The Zn content was highest in C. floridum which decreased in other species and reached a lowest in C. reticulata (Table 5). The average Cu content among seasons, plant type and shrubs were found to be different but no significant differences among production systems were shown; however, the highest Cu content was in the intensive system. The Cu was highest during dry season and in legumes species. The highest Cu content was found in A. peninsularis and the lowest in F. diguetii. Two species, Acacia peninsularis and C. floridum had Cu content that could meet adult goat necessities. In addition, the deficiency of Cu was evident between seasons, production systems and between plant types. The Fe content showed significant differences among systems, seasons, and shrubs. The shrubs from semi-intensive system had the greatest Fe content and was higher in shrubs collected during dry season. The Fe content was higher in non-legumes species; however, no significant differences between plant types was found. The Fe content in the shrubs showed that, only 46% of these shrubs had enough Fe content to satisfy goat requirements. The Mn content showed significant differences between production systems, seasons, plant types, and shrubs. The Mn was higher in shrubs collected in the semi-intensive system and higher in shrubs collected during dry season, while non-legumes showed the highest Mn content between plant types. The Mn showed the highest content in C. gayana, P. pringleii, C. dactylon, S. thurberi while J. cinerea while L. candida, P. sonorae and R. californica showed the lowest. The B content showed significant differences among production systems, seasons, and shrubs. The B was highest in the semi-intensive system and those shrubs collected during dry season. The non-legumes species showed the highest B content; although no differences between plant types were found. The species, Atriplex barclayana had the highest B and C. ciliaris had the lowest content.

Discussion

Macrominerals

The legumes species showed highest N content; these differences between legumes and nonlegumes have been observed amongst some woody and herbaceous forage in rangeland (Mugloo et al. 2023). In this study, difference of N content between production systems were not found, the mineral content of various shrubs or plants species consumed by goats in these systems makes them a valuable supplement, but this can also limit the quantities that can be fed (Moorby and Fraser 2021). In the three production systems, the Ca content in the shrubs was enough to meet necessity of an adult goat with a range of 1.3-3.3 g Ca kg-1 (NRC 1981). In terms of preferences, goats grazed on non-legumes and legumes during both the wet and dry season. Ramírez-Orduña et al. (2008) reported a higher Ca content in goat diets after the wet season when temperatures are dropping. The same authors found that Ca content was higher in non-legumes than legumes, similar results were found this study. Ramírez et al. (2001) and Moya-Rodríguez et al. (2002) reported that Ca content was highest in L. brevipes and R. californica both collected in the rangeland from the extensive system while Pennisetum sp. showed the lowest; the same results were found in this study. In arid areas some studies have been carried out to evaluate Ca content in shrubs (Ramírez et al. 2006, Ramírez-Orduña et al. 2008). However, the variation of this mineral is difficult to interpret; because of, Ca vary according to the forage species, plant types, soil, climate conditions, and other factors in the same region (Ramírez-Orduña et al. 2005) which are in agreement with the results found in this study. Therefore, the Ca content in goat’s production systems need to be determined according to the factors mentioned to meet the theoretical goat’s Ca requirements. In the three production systems, the Mg content in the shrubs was enough to cover the requirement of an adult goat with a range of 0.8-2.5 g Mg kg-1 (NRC 1981). The goats in both seasons consumed shrubs with enough Mg to meet the requirements and both non-legumes and legumes contribute with enough Mg to satisfy requirements. The previous studies in similar areas (arid o semiarid zones) (Barnes et al. 1990, Ramírez-Orduña et al. 2005, Ramírez et al. 2006, Badshah et al. 2012) reported that Mg is found in enough content to satisfy requirements of goats or other ruminant species. The Mg is present in ruminant body mass at about 0.05%. In this study, the plant K:Mg ratio was on average 0.21, with maximum and minimum of 0.6 and 0.04, respectively. In general, Mg differences in this study is partly due to differences in production systems, shrubs growth stage, plant species, Mg soil concentration, and seasons when the shrubs sampling was carried out. These results are supported by Müller et al. (2019) who reported significant deficiencies in P, protein and energy in the diets selected by herded and free-ranging goats and sheep in both wet and dry season in the Namaqualand Granite Renosterveld South Africa rangeland. The K content varied among non-legumes and legumes species and shrubs. Ramírez-Orduña et al. (2005) reported in an arid area of Baja California that K differed between species being higher in O. cholla. The variation of K content between shrubs depends on various factors (Boudjabi and Chenchouni 2022). Therefore, K may be a restrict mineral for livestock when they are consuming particularly ripe forage (Stewart et al. 2021). In this study, goats consumed sufficient amounts of K in the three production systems, during the two seasons, consuming both non-legumes and legumes since all shrubs showed enough K content to satisfy necessities of goats (1.8-2.5 g kg-1; NRC 1981). The K content of shrubs could be associated with water availability because K assimilation by the root is related to soil moisture (Jákli et al. 2018). The K content was higher during dry season; this response could be explained by differences between goat diets not so much by season, because under water tension, K assimilation could be restricted, and K deficit may develop (Ahanger et al. 2017). The rainfall and temperature affect the mineral content, showing that some plants had higher mineral content during summer and autumn when rainfall and temperature are high (Ramírez-Lozano et al. 2018). There is a reduced possibility of K deficit in some areas of the world since K content is enough to meet ruminant requirements(Ramírez-Orduña et al. 2005, Ramírez and Núñez-González 2006, Khan et al. 2007, Ramírez-Orduña et al. 2008, Badshah et al. 2012, Ramírez-Lozano et al. 2018, Tan 2020).The Na content were analogous to those reported by Ramírez-Orduña et al. (2005) who found that Na content was greater during spring when rainfall was lower in both legumes and non-legumes. The Na content among production systems, seasons and plant types were found to be much higher than the recommended amounts for livestock except for legumes (1.4 g kg-1NRC 1981). In an arid area of Baja California Sur Ramírez-Orduña et al. (2005) found that most plants had Na content to fulfil range goat necessities, but the contrary was described by Moya-Rodríguez et al. (2002) who found low and apparently deficient of Na content for goats needs in shrubs growing in arid regions. However, the analysis of Na content in this study showed that 46% of the shrubs evaluated had enough Na content to satisfy goat demands and all shrubs used in the intensive system, can cover the demand of goats. These deficiencies can be easily solved by supplementation, a common practice on some livestock farms in the arid and semiarid regions (Le Bodo et al. 2020).

The Cl content showed significant differences among production systems, shrubs, seasons, and plant types. Cabrera-Torres et al. (2009) determined the amount of micro and macro minerals in the most important forages species that grow in three zones of Quintana Roo, Mexico and found similar Cl content in forages and sample zones. The salt is irreplaceable in that animals have a much greater requirement for the Na and Cl in salt than for another mineral (Godswill et al. 2020). Because of some plants make available deficient Na for animal feeding and might lack acceptable Cl content, addition of salt is a serious part of a nutritionally well-adjusted diet for animals (Hassen et al. 2022). The P content was lower in all shrubs analyzed and was lower than those daily requirements (5.4 g kg-1) indicating that the P might not meet goat necessities, particularly during dry season in the extensive system, which is the most common production system in the arid area of the Baja California Sur state, Mexico. The goat’s diet in the three production systems may play a major role in P consumption, addition of P may be necessary to meet National Research Council necessities for goats (NRC 2007). In this case, P for goat in the extensive system could be partly covered by consuming two shrubs, C. x sonorae, and P. pringleii, while in the semi-intensive system, P could be partly covered by consuming T. lobaeformis, whereas in the intensive system goats should consume Z. mays or M. sativa. The P deficiencies in plants grown in arid zones was observed by Ramírez-Orduña et al. (2005); however, these results are in contradiction with those reported by Badshah et al. (2012), who found that P contents of the sampled plants were usually in the range of proposed limits. The values of P content in plants varied from 0.7 to 4.0 g kg-1 dry-basis (Ramírez et al. 2001, Khanal and Subba 2001). The study of Ramírez-Orduña et al. (2005) showed that P content varied between forages, seasons, plant types, years and so on. The P is the limited mineral to obtain for foraging animals in many regions, because of its low availability in rangeland plants and leach through soil erosion (Hussain and Durrani 2008, Ramírez-Lozano et al. 2018). This study did not include the possible variation of mineral content among plant tissues (stems, leaves, flowers and so on) which through diet selection could also disturb dietary P content (Grings et al. 1996). The Ca:P ratio is most important than actual content of either P or Ca. The ratio 2:1 was found best for optimum utilization and metabolism in goats (Ramírez and Núñez-González 2006). In this study, the Ca:P ratio varied from 0.14:1 in Pennisetum sp to 34:1 in L. brevipes, with an average value of 7.36:1. The high values of Ca:P ratio was reported by Ramírez Orduña et al. (2005), Ramírez and Núñez-González (2006); however, higher ratios are acceptable without affecting P metabolism if acceptable vitamin D is available (Underwood and Shuttle 1999) which is produced in the skin of goats that are out in sunlight. In this case, vitamin D in goats could be enough in all three production systems, the goats are under sun all day (extensive system) or in some periods of the day (semi-intensive and intensive systems).

Microminerals

Ramírez-Orduña et al. (2008) found significant differences of the Zn content among legumes and non-legumes in a semiarid zone contrary to the results of this study. The same authors found some increments of Zn during summer and winter rainfall. The studies reported of some shrubs in Texas, USA (Barnes et al. 1990) and Northeastern Mexico (Ramírez et al. 2001, Moya-Rodríguez et al. 2002) had Zn that changed seasonally, but only a small number of them had Zn that meet requirements of livestock and white-tailed deer necessities in the diet. Ramírez and Núñez-González (2006) found higher Zn content during spring and fall than other seasons. However, the shrubs had lower Zn contents than the average necessity for ruminants with about 30 mg Zn kg-1 dry-basis (Nasrullah et al. 2003). The Zn content in the shrubs was not sufficient in none of the plants and shrubs collected in production systems, and seasons, for recommended requirements for goats with a range of 40-50 mg kg-1 drybasis of Zn in their diets (Kessler 1991). In addition, Zn bioavailability due to plant maturity and tissue type (Kabata-Pendias and Pendias 2010) plays a significant role in its effective utilization in ruminant (Khan et al. 2007). The differences of Cu content among seasons, plant type and shrubs are comparable with those described by Ramírez et al. (2001) who found that Cu content in bushes, was higher for the period of spring than in other seasons, which is the epoch of active vegetative development and dry conditions. The Cu requirements in the diet for an adult goat ranged from 8 to 10 mg kg-1 dry-basis (Kessler 1991). In this study, some shrubs could meet adult goat necessities and are like those reported by Ramírez et al. (2004) and Ramírez-Lozano et al. (2018) who identified low Cu contents in shrubs from semiarid regions, where the main cause could be the high soil pH. Furthermore, low Cu contents are reported in tropical legumes species (Norton and Poppi 1995) where lands are slightly poor of Zn and Cu. Other studies have shown that Cu accessibility could be restricted by dietary fiber (Ramírez-Orduña et al. 2008); also, the high plant absorption of minerals, for example, Se and Mo could increase the Cu deficiency. The Cu requirements of goats may be higher (Ramadhan et al. 2022), being 40 mg kg-1 DM (NRC 2007) the maximum Cu tolerance level in the diet of goats. The Fe content differed among systems, seasons, and shrubs. Ramírez-Orduña et al. (2005) reported that non-legumes showed higher Fe content than legumes during fall and winter. The Fe content was found to be enough to meet requirements of 35 mg kg-1 dry-matter (NRC 1981) when Fe content was considered in average between production systems, seasons, and plant types. The Fe content vary between shrubs; C. gayana had the highest followed by J. cinerea while Ferocactus spp. and F. diguetti had the lowest content. Some shrubs showed values well over necessities, but not at toxic levels, so that these shrubs are able to contribute to the goat’s diet to balance the Fe content. This result agrees with Ramírez et al. (2001) and Moya-Rodríguez et al. (2002) who discuss that Mexican bushes growing in semiarid areas had Fe content in significant content to meet necessities of goats. The differences in the Fe content between shrubs can be elucidated by forage species modifications and the effect of grazing parcels on the level of Fe in the soil. The forage Fe is a function of forage species, soil Fe concentration, source, and type of soil, which forages are grown (Ferreira et al. 2021); in addition, the fluctuating conditions of environment, as well as biological stage of plants, affect the Fe uptake by the plants (Kabata-Pendias and Pendias 2010, Trivedi et al. 2020). The Mn content showed significant differences between systems, seasons, plant types, and shrubs. These findings are in accordance with those reported by Ramírez-Orduña et al. (2005) who found a variation of Mn content between years, when rainfall was sparse. In this study non-legumes showed the highest Mn content. Comparable effects were obtained by Ramírez-Orduña et al. (2005) who described low Mn content in legumes than in non-legumes during winter. The dry season in the study area coincides with late winter, spring, and early summer. The results found here are similar with those reported by Ramírez et al. (2001) and Moya-Rodríguez et al. (2002) who reported that Mn concentration was highest in spring and winter than summer and autumn, whilst Ramírez and Núñez-González (2006) found higher Mn content in all forbs during spring and fall than other seasons. The variation of Mn content among shrubs may to complicate to exactly predict Mn concentrations in animal’s diet. In this study, goats had diets with not enough Mn amounts to meet necessities with a range of 30-40 mg Mn kg-1 dry-basis (Kessler 1991). The Mn content among and within plant species differed by soil types, plant types, plants mature, plant tissues and seasons (Grings et al. 1996, Ramírez et al. 2001). This study revealed that A. barclayana had the highest B and C. ciliaris had the lowest content. The species related with A. barclayana such as A. garner, are commonly seeded in mixtures and established on reclaimed sites in Wyoming, USA which has been identified as having potentially high levels of B in soil (Winslow et al. 2009). The B is apparently not essential in the diet of ruminant animals (Abdelnour et al. 2018). The metabolism of B is closely related to that of Ca in ruminant animals and may regulate parahormone action and play a role as a cofactor of certain enzymatic reactions (Upadhaya and Kim 2020). The excess and toxic content of B in soils of semi-arid and arid regions are often more of a problem than due to deficiencies (Brdar-Jovanović 2020). The ruminant animals excrete excess amounts of dietary B in the urine avoiding toxicity (Suttle 2022). The B concentration in the tissues and fluids of ruminant animals appear to directly reflect B concentration in the diet (Yirga et al. 2018). The B contained in the tissues of forage plants is not necessarily present in a soluble form (Brdar-Jovanović 2020).

Conclusions

The shrubs showed differences among macro and minerals content and most of these macro and micro minerals showed changes through production systems (intensive, semi-intensive and extensive), seasons (wet and dry) and types of plants (legumes and non-legumes). The shrubs in the two production systems (extensive and semi-intensive) had acceptable content of Ca, Mg, K, Na, B, Cl and N for grazing ruminants; however, these shrubs had lower contents of Zn, Cu, Fe, and Mn, also lower contents of P than the diet necessities for some ruminants. The higher content of most macro and micro minerals in non-legumes added in the goat diets could be considered as good nutritional quality. In addition, the status of mineral content shrubs of the semi-intensive production system, 58% of all minerals showed higher values, and hence, could be the best production system in this arid region. The higher content of some essential minerals in L. brevipes, T. lobaeformis, A. barclayana all of them collected in the semi-intensive system; also S. thurberi from extensive system and C. gayana from intensive system, therefore, these shrubs can be considered a good nutritional quality.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas del Noroeste, S.C. (CIBNOR) with fiscal projects grants. Thanks to Pedro Luna-Garcia, Lidia Hirales-Lucero, Mario Benson-Rosas, and Carmen Mercado-Guido for their excellent technical assistance.

Literature cited

Abdelnour S.A, Abd El-Hack MA, Swelum AA, Perillo A, Losacco C (2018) The vital roles of boron in animal health and production: A comprehensive review, Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology 50: 296-304. [ Links ]

Ahanger MA, Tomar NS, Tittal M, Argal S, Agarwal RM (2017) Plant growth under water/salt stress: ROS production; antioxidants and significance of added potassium under such conditions. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants 23: 731-744. [ Links ]

Arthington JD, Ranches J (2021) Trace mineral nutrition of grazing beef cattle. Animals 11(10): 2767. DOI: 10.3390/ani11102767. [ Links ]

Badshah L, Hussain F, Perveen S, Zaman S (2012) Seasonal variation in the macromineral in some woody and herbaceous forage in rangeland District, Tank, Pakistan. Journal of Medicinal Plants Research 6: 4167- 4175. [ Links ]

Barnes TG, Varner LW, Blankenship LH, Fillinger TJ, Heineman SC (1990) Macro and trace mineral content of selected south Texas deer forages. Journal of Range Management 43: 220-223. [ Links ]

Boudjabi S, Chenchouni H (2022) Soil fertility indicators and soil stoichiometry in semi-arid steppe rangelands, CATENA 210: 105910. DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2021.105910. [ Links ]

Brdar-Jokanović M (2020) Boron toxicity and deficiency in agricultural plants. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21(4): 1424. DOI: 10.3390/ijms21041424. [ Links ]

Cabrera-Torres E, Sosa-Rubio EE, Castellanos-Ruelas AF, Gutiérrez-Baeza AO, Ramírez-Silva JH (2009) Comparación de la concentración mineral en forrajes y suelos de zonas ganaderas del Estado de Quintana Roo, México. Veterinaria México 40: 167-179. [ Links ]

Costantini M, Vázquez-Rowe I, Manzardo A, Bacenetti J (2021) Environmental impact assessment of beef cattle production in semi-intensive systems in Paraguay. Sustainable Production and Consumption 27: 269-281. [ Links ]

Cousins B, Alcock, R, Aliber M, Geraci M, Mayson D, Satgé R (2020) GTAC/ CBPEP/EU project on employmentintensive rural land reform in South Africa: policies, programmes and capacities Final Report. 38p. [ Links ]

Ferreira, DAP, Gaião LM, Kozovits AR, Messias MCTB (2021) Evaluation of metal accumulation in the forage grass Brachiaria decumbens Stapf grown in contaminated soils with iron tailings. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management 18(2): 1-11. DOI: 10.1002/ieam.4495. [ Links ]

Godswill AG, Somtochukwu IV, Ikechukwu AO, Kate EC (2020) Health benefits of micronutrients (vitamins and minerals) and their associated deficiency diseases: A systematic review. International Journal of Food Sciences 3(1):1-32. DOI: 10.47604/ijf.1024. [ Links ]

Grings EE, Haferkamp MR, Heitschmidt RK, Karl MG (1996) Mineral dynamics in forages of the Northern Great Plains. Journal of Range Management 49: 234-240. [ Links ]

Hassen A, Ahmed R, Alam MS, Chavula P, Mohammed SS, and Dawid A (2022) The effect of feed supplementation on cow milk productivity and quality: a brief study. International Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science 4: 13-25. [ Links ]

Henry B, Eckard R, Beauchemin K (2018) Review: Adaptation of ruminant livestock production systems to climate changes. Animal 12: S445-S456. [ Links ]

Hussain F, Durrani MJ (2008) Mineral composition of some range grasses and shrubs from Harboi rangeland Kalat, Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Botany 40: 2513-2523. [ Links ]

INEGI (2006) Sistemas Nacionales Estadísticos y de Información Geográfica. Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática. http://www.inegi.com.mx . Accessed: September 30, 2022. [ Links ]

Jákli B, Hauer-Jákli M, Böttcher F, zur Müdehorst JM, Senbayram M, Dittert K (2018) Leaf, canopy and agronomic water-use efficiency of field-grown sugar beet in response to potassium fertilization. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 204: 99-110. [ Links ]

Johnson DE (1988) Applied multivariate methods for data analysis. Brooks Cole Publishing Company. U.S.A. 567p. [ Links ]

Kabata-Pendias A, Pendias H (2010) Trace elements in soils and plants. 4 th Edition. Boca Raton CRC Press Inc. Boca Raton, FL, USA. 548p. [ Links ]

Kessler J (1991) Mineral nutrition of goats. In: Morand-Fehr P (ed) Goat nutrition. Vol. 46. EAAP Publication. USA. pp: 104-119. [ Links ]

Khan ZI, Ashraf M, Javed I, Ermidou-Pollet IS (2007) Transfer of sodium from soil and forage to sheep and goats grazing in a semiarid region of Pakistan. Influence of the seasons. Trace Elements and Electrolytes 24: 49-54. [ Links ]

Khanal RC, Subba DB (2001) Nutritional evaluation of leaves from some major fodder trees cultivated in the hills of Nepal. Animal Feed Science and Technology 92: 17-32. [ Links ]

Kubkomawa HI (2019) Nutrient requirements of livestock for sustainable productivity in tropical Africa: a review. Journal of Emerging Trends in Engineering and Applied Sciences 10: 5. [ Links ]

Kumar R, Diwakar RP, Verma HC, Kumar A (2020) The saga of macrominerals and its role in reproduction in domestic animals: A Review. Global Veterinaria 22: 267-272. [ Links ]

Langova L, Novotna I, Nemcova P, Machacek M, Havlicek Z, Zemanova M, Chrast V (2020) Impact of nutrients on the hoof health in cattle. Animals 10(10):1824. DOI: 10.3390/ani10101824 [ Links ]

Le Bodo E, Hornick JL, Moula N, Zuñiga SA, Martínez-Alfaro JC (2020) Assessment of gastrointestinal parasites and productive parameters on sheep fed on a ration supplemented with Guazuma ulmifolia leaves in Southern Mexico. Animals 10(9): 1617. DOI: 10.3390/ani10091617 [ Links ]

McKenna MD, S Grams SE, Barasha M, Antoninka AJ, Johnson NC (2022) Organic and inorganic soil carbon in a semi-arid rangeland is primarily related to abiotic factors and not livestock grazing. Geoderma 419: 115844. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2022.115844. [ Links ]

Mellado M, Rodríguez IJ, Alvarado-Espino A, Véliz FG, Mellado J, García JE (2020) Short communication: Reproductive response to concentrate supplementation of mixed-breed goats on rangeland. Tropical Animal Health Production 52: 2737-2741. [ Links ]

Mihiretu A, Okoyo NE, Lemma T (2019) Determinants of adaptation choices to climate change in agro-pastoral dry lands of Northeastern Amhara, Ethiopia. Cogent Environmental Science 5:1. DOI: 10.1080/23311843.2019. 1636548. [ Links ]

Miller BA, Lu CD (2019) Current status of global dairy goat production: An overview. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science 32(8):1219-1232. [ Links ]

Mlaza N, Tefera S, Hassen A (2022) Spatio-temporal status of vegetation, soil and cattle serum minerals in degraded communal rangelands of the Eastern Cape, South Africa: Implications for livestock sustainability and management interventions. African Journal of Range and Forage Science 40: 20-31. [ Links ]

Moorby JM, Fraser MD (2021) Review: New feeds and new feeding systems in intensive and semi-intensive forage-fed ruminant livestock systems. Animal 15: Supplement 1. 100297. DOI: 10.1016/j.animal.2021.100297. [ Links ]

Moya-Rodríguez RJG, Ramírez RG, Foroughbakhch R, Hauad L, Gonzalez H (2002) Variación estacional de minerales en las hojas de ocho especies arbustivas. Ciencia UANL 5: 59-65. [ Links ]

Mugloo JA, Khanday Mud, Dar Mud, Saleem I, Alharby HF, Bamagoos AA, Alghamdi SA, Abdulmajeed AM, Kumar P, Abou Fayssal S (2023) Biomass and leaf nutrition contents of selected grass and legume species in high altitude rangelands of Kashmir Himalaya Valley (Jammu & Kashmir), India. Plants 12 (7): 1448. DOI: 10.3390/plants12071448. [ Links ]

Müller FL, Samuels MI, Cupido CF, Swarts MBV, Amary NM, Hattas D, Morris C, Cyster LF, Boatwright JS (2019) The impacts of season and livestock management strategy on the quality of diets selected by goats and sheep in the semi-arid rangelands of Namaqualand, South Africa. African Journal of Range and Forage Science 36: 105-114. [ Links ]

Nair PM, Anil, Anand VM, Singh AK, Mani V, Dhaigude V, Mondal G (2022) Trace mineral requirement for growth performance and immunity of calves. Traces in Agriculture Science 1: 341-346. [ Links ]

Nasrullah M Niimi, Akashi R, Kawamura O (2003) Nutritive evaluation of forage plants in South Sulawesi, Indonesia. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science 16: 693-701. [ Links ]

NRC (1981) Nutrients requirements of goats: Angora, dairy and meat goats in temperate and tropical countries. National Research Council. The National Academy Press. Washington, DC, USA. 100p. [ Links ]

NRC (2007) Nutrient requirements of small ruminants: Sheep, goats, cervids, and new world camelids. 1st Edition. National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA. 352p. [ Links ]

Norton BW, Poppi DP (1995) Composition and nutritional attributes of pasture legumes. In: D‘Mello JPF, Devendra C (eds) Tropical legumes in animal nutrition. CAB International. pp. 23-48. [ Links ]

Ramadhan MR, Schlecht E, Dickhoefer U, Mahgoub O, Joergensen RG (2022) Feed digestibility, digesta passage and faecal microbial biomass in desert- adapted goats exposed to mild water restriction. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 106: 721-732. [ Links ]

Ramírez RG, González-Rodríguez H, Ramírez-Orduña R, Cerrillo-Soto MA, Juárez-Reyes AS (2006) Seasonal trends of macro and micro minerals in 10 browse species that grow in northeastern Mexico. Animal Feed Science and Technology 128: 155-164. [ Links ]

Ramírez RG, Haenlein GFW, García-Castillo CG, Núñez-González MA (2004) Protein, lignin and mineral contents and in situ dry matter digestibility of native Mexican grasses consumed by range goats. Small Ruminant Research 52: 261-269. [ Links ]

Ramírez RG, Haenlein GFW, Núñez-González MA (2001) Seasonal variation of macro and trace mineral contents in 14 browse species that grow in Northeastern Mexico. Small Ruminant Research 39: 153-159. [ Links ]

Ramírez RG, Núñez-González MA (2006) Chemical composition, digestion and mineral content of native forbs consumed by range sheep. Journal of Animal Veterinary Advance 5: 1158-1164. [ Links ]

Ramírez-Lozano RG, Cantú-Silva I, Gómez-Meza MV, González-Rodríguez H (2018) Mineral content in leaf litter of Tamaulipas thorny scrub. Ecosisistemas y Recursos Agropecuarios 5: 119-125. [ Links ]

Ramírez-Orduña R, Ramírez RG, González-Rodríguez H, Haenlein W (2005) Mineral content of browse species from Baja California Sur, Mexico. Small Ruminant Research 57: 1-10. [ Links ]

Ramírez-Orduña R, Ramírez RG, Romero-Vadillo E, González-Rodríguez H, Armenta-Quintana JA, AvalosCastro R (2008) Diet and nutrition of range goats on a sarcocaulescent shrubland from Baja California Sur, Mexico. Small Ruminant Research 76: 166-176 [ Links ]

Singh R, Sharma RK, Babu S, Bhatnagar YV (2020) Traditional ecological knowledge and contemporary changes in the agro-pastoral system of upper spiti landscape, Indian Trans-Himalayas. Pastoralism 10: 15. DOI: 10.1186/s13570-020-00169-y. [ Links ]

Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1998) Biometry: The principles and practice of statistics in biological research. 3 rd ed. Freeman & Co. San Francisco, CA, USA. 937p. [ Links ]

StatSoft Inc (2011) Statistica. System reference. StatSoft, Inc., Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA. 1098p. [ Links ]

Stewart WC, Scasta JD, Taylor JB, Murphy TW, Julian AAM (2021) Invited review: Mineral nutrition considerations for extensive sheep production systems. Applied Animal Science 37: 256-272. [ Links ]

Suttle NF (2022) Mineral nutrition of livestock. 5th ed. CAB International. Oxfordshire, UK. 600p. [ Links ]

Tan M (2020) Macro- and micromineral contents of different quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) varieties used as forage by cattle. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 44(1): Article 5. DOI: 10.3906/tar-1904-10. [ Links ]

Toyes-Vargas E, Córdoba-Matson M, Espinoza-Villavicencio JL, Palacios-Espinosa A, Murillo-Amador B (2013a) Goat milk fatty acid composition in the Peninsula of Baja California, Mexico. Revista MVZ Córdoba 18: 3843-3850. [ Links ]

Toyes-Vargas E, Murillo-Amador B, Espinoza-Villavicencio JL, Carreón-Palau L, Palacios-Espinosa A (2013b) Chemical composition and vaccenic and rumenic acid precursors in five rangeland forage species in Baja California Sur, Mexico. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Pecuarias 4: 373-386. [ Links ]

Toyes-Vargas E, González-García H, Córdoba-Matson MV, Ortega-Pérez R, Espinoza-Villavicencio JL, Palacios-Espinosa A, Ávila-Serrano NY, Murillo-Amador B (2014) Milk fatty acid composition from goats in a semi intensive production system in an arid region of the peninsula of Baja California, Mexico. Turkish Journal of Veterinary Animal Science 38: 312-317. [ Links ]

Trivedi P, Leach JE, Tringe SG, Tongmin S, Singh BK (2020) Plant-microbiome interactions: from community assembly to plant health. Nature Reviews Microbiology 18:607-621. [ Links ]

Underwood EJ, Shuttle NF (1999) The mineral nutrition of livestock. 3rd ed. CAB International, Wallingford. U.K. 614p. [ Links ]

Upadhaya SD, Kim IH (2020) Importance of micronutrients in bone health of monogastric animals and techniques to improve the bioavailability of micronutrient supplements - A review. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science 33: 1885-1895. [ Links ]

Vosooghi-Postindoz V, Tahmasbi A, Naserian AA, Valizade R, Ebrahimi H (2018) Effect of water deprivation and drinking saline water on performance, blood metabolites, nutrient digestibility, and rumen parameters in Baluchi Lambs. Iranian Journal of Applied Animal Science 8: 445-456. [ Links ]

Winslow SR, Clause KJ, Jacobs JS, Hybner RM (2009) Revegetation trials in the pinedale anticline project area. In: Barnhisel RI (ed) National meeting of the American Society of Mining and Reclamation, Billings, MT, revitalizing the environment: Proven Solutions and Innovative Approaches Lexington, KY . pp: 1627-1661. [ Links ]

Yirga H, Puchala R, Tsukahara Y, Tesfai K, Sahlu T, Mengistu UL, Goetsch AL (2018) Effects of level of brackish water and salinity on feed intake, digestion, heat energy, ruminal fluid characteristics, and blood constituent levels in growing Boer goat wethers and mature Boer goat and Katahdin sheep wethers. Small Ruminant Research 164: 70-81 [ Links ]

Received: November 03, 2022; Accepted: August 01, 2023

Corresponding author: bmurillo04@cibnor.mx

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License