SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.100 número3Variación fenológica y morfométrica de Phaseolus vulgaris (Fabaceae) de cinco poblaciones silvestres de Durango, MéxicoEfecto de la edad de las semillas en la germinación de especies nativas de los pastizales del altiplano del norte de México índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Botanical Sciences

versión On-line ISSN 2007-4476versión impresa ISSN 2007-4298

Bot. sci vol.100 no.3 México jul./sep. 2022  Epub 16-Mayo-2022

https://doi.org/10.17129/botsci.3001 

Ecology

Variability in leaf morphological traits of an endemic Mexican oak (Quercus mexicana Bonpl.) along an environmental gradient

Variabilidad en caracteres morfológicos foliares de un encino endémico mexicano (Quercus mexicana Bonpl.) a lo largo de un gradiente ambiental

Vanessa Sánchez-Acevedo1  2 

Andrés Torres-Miranda1 

Claudia Gutiérrez-Arellano1 

Karen Beatriz Hernández-Esquivel1 

Ken Oyama1  * 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0367-1964

1 Escuela Nacional de Estudios de Superiores, Unidad Morelia, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Morelia, México.

2 Posgrado en Ciencias Biológicas. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, CDMX, México.


Abstract

Background:

Phenotypic and functional traits of plant populations vary with environmental conditions at local and regional scales. The analysis of these traits along environmental gradients provides information on the differential response of populations to climate changes.

Objective:

We analyzed the leaf morphological variation of an endemic oak to identify the degree of population differentiation along an environmental gradient.

Study species:

Quercus mexicana Bonpl. (Fagaceae).

Study site and dates:

Samples were collected from 39 populations in the Sierra Madre Oriental and east of the Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt from 2014 to 2016.

Methods:

We measured eight macromorphological traits in 5,507 leaves and three micromorphological traits in 228 leaves. We performed univariate and multivariate statistical analyses to assess the morphological differentiation among populations, and the relationship between variation in leaf traits and environmental variables related to temperature and water availability.

Results:

Populations of Q. mexicana showed leaf morphological differentiation along its distribution. Significant linear correlations were found between leaf traits and environmental variables. Smaller and thicker leaves with lower density of trichomes and smaller stomata were found in populations located in more arid regions. In contrast, larger and thinner leaves with higher trichome density and larger stomata occurred in more humid places.

Conclusions:

Populations of Q. mexicana are adapted to a wide range of climatic conditions. Considering the predictive future climatic changes for the region (i.e., warmer and drier conditions), Q. mexicana populations with traits better adapted to a more humid and cooler environments could be negatively affected.

Keywords: climate change; drought tolerance; endemic oaks; leaf variation; morfo-functional traits; Sierra Madre Oriental

Resumen

Antecedentes:

Los caracteres fenotípicos y funcionales de las poblaciones de plantas varían a escalas local y regional. El análisis de estos caracteres a lo largo de gradientes ambientales proporciona información sobre la respuesta diferencial de las poblaciones a cambios climáticos.

Objetivo:

Analizamos la variación foliar morfológica de un encino endémico para identificar el grado de diferenciación poblacional a un gradiente ambiental.

Especie de estudio:

Quercus mexicana Bonpl. (Fagaceae).

Sitio de estudio y fechas:

Se colectaron 39 poblaciones en la Sierra Madre Oriental y del este de la Faja Volcánica Transmexicana de 2014 al 2016.

Métodos:

Medimos ocho caracteres macromorfológicos en 5,507 hojas y tres micromorfológicos en 228 hojas. Se realizaron análisis estadísticos univariados y multivariados para evaluar la diferenciación morfológica entre poblaciones, y las relaciones entre la variación foliar y variables relacionadas con la temperatura y la disponibilidad de agua.

Resultados:

Las poblaciones de Q. mexicana están diferenciadas a lo largo de su distribución. Se encontraron correlaciones significativas entre caracteres foliares y variables ambientales. Hojas pequeñas y gruesas con baja densidad de tricomas y estomas pequeños se encontraron en sitios más áridos. En contraste, hojas más grandes y delgadas con mayor densidad de tricomas y estomas más grandes ocurrieron en sitios más húmedos.

Conclusiones:

Las poblaciones de Q. mexicana están adaptadas a un amplio intervalo de condiciones climáticas. Considerando los futuros cambios climáticos para la región (i.e., condiciones más secas y cálidas), las poblaciones de Q. mexicana con caracteres adaptados a ambientes más húmedos y fríos podrían afectarse negativamente.

Palabras clave: cambio climático; caracteres morfo-funcionales; encinos endémicos; tolerancia a la sequía; variación foliar; Sierra Madre Oriental

Variation in climatic conditions at local and regional scales determines the phenotypic and physiological expression of plants and, at larger scales, the geographical distribution patterns of plant species (Pollock et al. 2012, Stahl et al. 2014, Riordan et al. 2016). Phenotypic variability in functional traits determines the limits of species distributions (Pollock et al. 2012, Stahl et al. 2014, Körner et al. 2016) through the intraspecific responses of plants to specific environmental factors (Albert et al. 2010, Laforest-Lapointe et al. 2014, Henn et al. 2018), in turn determining the ecological differentiation among populations (Albarrán-Lara et al. 2019, Martínez-Blancas & Martorell 2020). Identifying the relationships between morphological traits and environmental changes increases our understanding of the differential responses of populations, the potential shifts in species distributions, and the potential responses of plant species to climate change (Valladares et al. 2014, Henn et al. 2018).

Temperature and precipitation are two of the main environmental drivers of leaf variation at a global scale (Moles et al. 2014, Valladares et al. 2014, Wright et al. 2017). Patterns of foliar variation associated with gradients of temperature and precipitation have been identified for some leaf traits. For instance, plants with smaller leaves occur at sites with lower mean annual precipitation (Wright et al. 2017) along latitudinal (Uribe-Salas et al. 2008) or elevational (Tang & Ohsawa 1999) gradients. Similarly, leaf dry mass per area and leaf thickness have shown positive relationships with high solar radiation and temperature and negative relationships with rainfall at the multispecies level at a global scale (Niinemets 2001). However, these patterns vary at the intraspecific level at a regional scale. Variation among populations has been observed for some traits; for instance, a larger leaf area has been associated with high rainfall (Gouveia & Freitas 2009), and greater leaf vein density has been observed in drier environments (Zhu et al. 2012).

The density and type of trichomes also provide evidence of the functional responses of plants exposed to different environmental conditions. Under dry conditions, trichomes reduce the absorbance of solar radiation (Benz & Martin 2006), providing resistance to low temperatures (Agrawal et al. 2004) and UV ray protection (Schilmiller et al. 2008). Similarly, the importance of stomata in sensing and driving environmental change has been observed (Hetherington & Woodward 2003). Reduced stomatal density has been observed at higher CO2 concentrations (Casson & Gray 2008), while stomatal density tends to increase in plants located at sites with elevated temperature and drought stress (Yan et al. 2017).

In this study, we analyzed the intraspecific variation in leaf morphological and functional traits in response to environmental gradients for an endemic red oak from northeastern Mexico: Quercus mexicana Bonpl. (Section Lobatae). The populations of Q. mexicana are distributed over a wide area, including subhumid regions, temperate forests, and xeric areas (Pérez-Mojica & Valencia-Á. 2017), in which conditions of temperature, precipitation and humidity display a large degree of variation. The objectives of this study were to determine the variation and degree of differentiation in leaf morphological traits among the populations of Q. mexicana and assess the relative influences of climatic and geographic factors on this phenotypic variation throughout the entire distribution of this species.

Materials and methods

Study species. Quercus mexicana is a tree species that grows between 6 to 12 m tall. This species presents coriaceous leaves that are elliptic, or oblong to oblong-obovate, from 2.8 to 8 cm in length and 1.5 to 2.5 cm in width and bear 7 to 12 secondary veins. Leaves present stellate trichomes at the base of the adaxial side and fasciculate trichomes on the abaxial side (Pérez-Mojica & Valencia-Á. 2017). Quercus mexicana is distributed mainly in the Sierra Madre Oriental (eastern Mexico) and at the eastern boundaries of the Mexican Plateau and the Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt (Figure 1). It has been recorded in pine forests, oak forests, and xeric shrublands at elevations ranging from 1,600 to 2,700 m in clay soils with rocky outcrops (Pérez-Mojica & Valencia-Á. 2017).

Figure 1 Study area. (A) Geographic locations of the 39 populations of Quercus mexicana across the Sierra Madre Oriental (SMO in red) and adjacent regions (in blue). Maps of (B) annual mean temperature and (C) aridity index in the study area. Population abbreviations are described in Appendix 1

Study area. The Sierra Madre Oriental is a mountain chain with marked climatic and environmental variation and a noticeable difference in the composition of the biotas. Hernández & Carrasco (2004) reported arid to warm humid climates (temperature ranges between 12 and 25 °C, and annual precipitation ranges between 300 mm and 4,000 mm). The northern and southern regions of the Sierra Madre Oriental are separated by the Pánuco Depression; a warm and humid climate dominates on the Gulf of Mexico slope, while it becomes arid and warm towards the western slope and the south, and colder towards the north, particularly in the highlands (Hernández & Carrasco 2004, Figure 1). The climatic differences of the Sierra Madre Oriental with respect to the Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt and Mexican Plateau are also striking, with colder temperatures and higher humidity or aridity in the last two regions (Figure 1).

Sampling strategy. Leaf samples were collected from 39 populations of Q. mexicana throughout its geographic distribution (Figure 1, Appendix 1) (Valencia-Á. 2004). In each population, 10 individuals separated by at least 20 m apart were randomly selected. From each tree, 15 mature leaves were collected from the lower branches. The collected leaves were pressed and dried in an oven at 70 °C.

Leaf macromorphological traits. For each of the 5,507 sampled leaves, leaf length and thickness were measured with a digital Vernier caliper. Measurements of dry weight were performed with an analytical balance (precision = 0.001 g). Leaf area (LA, cm2) was estimated through a quantitative evaluation of the area and leaf shape contours using elliptical Fourier descriptors with SHAPE ver. 3.1 software (Iwata & Ukai 2002). With this procedure, a matrix of eight macromorphological traits (MMAC, Table 1) was constructed: leaf length, leaf width, leaf length/leaf width ratio, number of secondary veins, leaf thickness, specific leaf area, petiole length and petiole width.

Table 1 List of macro- and micromorphological leaf traits and environmental variables used to identify the differentiation among populations of Quercus mexicana

Leaf morphological traits (MMOR)
Macromorphological (MMAC) traits Micromorphological (MMIC) traits
LL Leaf length DTR Density of trichomes
LW Leaf width STD Stomatal density
LWr Leaf (length / width) ratio STL Stomatal aperture length
PL Petiole length
PW Petiole width
SLA Specific leaf area
NV Number of secondary veins
LT Leaf thickness
Environmental variables
Water-related variables Temperature-related variables
AI Aridity index AMT Annual mean temperature
PET Potential of evapotranspiration TS Temperature seasonality
AP Annual precipitation ATR Annual temperature range
PS Precipitation seasonality MTC Mean temperature of coldest quarter
PD Precipitation of driest quarter

Leaf micromorphological traits. We randomly selected four to six leaves per population of Q. mexicana for a total of 228 leaves to measure leaf trichomes and stomata using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Three images corresponding to the X100, X200 and X500 fields for each leaf were taken; in total, 684 images were analyzed. For each population, trichome density (trichome number/area) was quantified using X100 field images and stomatal density (stomatal number/area) with X200 field images with the Digimizer software (www.digimizer.com). The X500 images were used to measure stomatal aperture length in µm. The three variables were integrated into a micromorphological matrix (MMIC, Table 1) for further analysis.

Environmental variables. A matrix of nine environmental variables without collinearity that described the conditions of each sampled population was constructed (Table 1). Seven noncorrelated bioclimatic variables were obtained from WorldClim (Hijmans et al. 2005): annual mean temperature, temperature seasonality, annual temperature range, mean temperature of coldest quarter, annual precipitation, precipitation seasonality, and precipitation of driest quarter. Potential evapotranspiration and an aridity index were obtained from the Global Aridity Index and Potential Evapotranspiration Climate Database version 2.0 (Trabucco & Zomer 2009). Potential evapotranspiration relates the evapotranspiration processes and rainfall deficit, and aridity index represents the ratio between precipitation and potential evapotranspiration (high or low values of aridity index correspond to wet or arid conditions, respectively). Latitude was added as a geographic variable. Visualization and manipulation of climatic information was performed using ArcMap® v. 10.2 (ESRI). The overall topographic variables were calculated using Google Earth®.

Univariate analyses. Statistics of each morphological trait were calculated for each of the 39 populations. As a first step, to determine the differences in leaf morphological and functional traits among populations of Q. mexicana, we used ANOVA for each of the eight macromorphological and the three micromorphological variables, and a Tukey-Kramer test was conducted for a posteriori comparison among populations using R v. 3.6.1 software (R Core Team 2016). Then, data normality was tested using a Shapiro-Wilk test, and Pearson correlations were calculated with R software, using nine bioclimatic variables and latitude as independent variables and eight macromorphological (MMAC) and three micromorphological traits (MMIC) as dependent variables.

Multivariate analyses. We performed discriminant function analysis (DFA) and clustering analysis (CA) to identify leaf morphological groups among populations. First, a DFA was performed based on the morphofunctional traits (MMAC, MMIC, and MMOR), and we used each of the 39 populations as a discriminant factor. Second, from the DFA results, the centroids of each population were obtained, the Euclidian distance among centroids was calculated, and the CA was performed with the Ward method (Ward & Hook 1963). The CA was performed to yield a dendrogram depicting the morphological relatedness among the means of individuals in each population.

From the previously identified groups (named morphogroups), a DFA was performed based on the differences among environmental conditions between morphogroups. Three independent analyses were conducted following the previous procedure: the first considering macromorphological traits (DFAMAC), the second with micromorphological traits (DFAMIC) and the third considering both attribute sets (DFAMOR). This procedure was performed with R software.

To evaluate the contribution of temperature and water availability to leaf morphological variation at a global scale, three redundancy analyses (RDAs) were performed considering the following data sets: a) a complete model including both sets of bioclimatic variables (RDAfull: space + climate), b) a partial model considering temperature-related variables controlling the water effect (pRDA1: climate|space), and c) a partial model considering water-related variables controlling the temperature effect (pRDA2: space|climate). Three independent analyses were performed: the first considering macromorphological traits (RDAMAC), the second with micromorphological traits (RDAMIC) and the third considering both traits (RDAMOR). This procedure was performed with the vegan package in R software.

Results

Univariate analyses. All the morphological traits, except for stomatal density, showed significant differences among populations (Figure 2; Appendix 1). After Tukey's test (with at least P < 0.05), the morphological traits that had the greatest differences among populations were leaf width, leaf thickness, number of secondary veins and petiole length. In addition, all the morphological traits displayed gradual variation among all the populations (Figure 2).

Figure 2 Summary of the Tukey-Kramer post-hoc tests for the differentiation of micro- and macromorphological traits among populations of Quercus mexicana. Lines above populations indicate no significant differences (at P < 0.05) and only the results with a significance P < 0.001 are presented. Abbreviations of leaf morphological traits as indicated in Table 1

Among the macromorphological traits, leaf length varied without a regional pattern, whereas leaf width was significantly smaller and the leaf length/width ratio was significantly larger in the northern populations of the Sierra Madre Oriental (Figure 1). Petiole length was significantly longer in some populations in the north of the Sierra Madre Oriental (N1, N2, S1), in Hidalgo (H1, H3), and in the Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt in Estado de Mexico and Tlaxcala (T3). Significantly wider petioles were detected in a group of populations in the northern Sierra Madre Oriental (N1, N4, N6, S5) and in the southwestern Sierra Madre Oriental (H5, Q4, Q7); narrower petioles were found in the southeastern Sierra Madre Oriental (H7, V1, P4) and parts of the Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt (M1, P2). The specific leaf area differed in only a couple of populations in the north, and some populations displayed smaller leaf areas. The number of veins was significantly greater in the northern Sierra Madre Oriental and smaller in the southeastern Sierra Madre Oriental (H1, H7, P5, V1) as well as in some populations of the Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt (P1, T1). The thickest leaves were found in the northern Sierra Madre Oriental and in populations in the southwestern Sierra Madre Oriental (H3, H4, M2). Significantly thinner leaves were found in several populations, predominantly in San Luis Potosí, Puebla, and Querétaro (Appendix 2).

With respect to the micromorphological traits, the populations that displayed the highest density of trichomes were in Puebla (P2, P4), and the lowest density of trichomes was found in populations of the northern Sierra Madre Oriental (N2, N3, N5), as well as populations in Hidalgo (H2, H4). The stomatal aperture length was smaller in most of the populations from Querétaro, as well as some in the north (N3, S2); the largest stomatal aperture was found in populations from the Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt, significantly differing only in Tlaxcala (T2) (Figure 2; Appendix 2).

In the linear correlation analyses (Table 3; Figure 3), leaf length and specific leaf area displayed similar correlations with the environmental variables; they were positively correlated with latitude, all the temperature variables, potential evapotranspiration, and precipitation of driest quarter, and negatively correlated with the aridity index. Leaf width followed a similar pattern except that it was correlated with precipitation seasonality, and no correlation with the aridity index was found. The leaf length/width ratio was only positively correlated with latitude and negatively correlated with precipitation seasonality. The number of veins and leaf thickness were positively correlated with latitude, temperature seasonality, potential evapotranspiration and precipitation of driest quarter, and the number of veins and leaf thickness were inversely correlated with the aridity index and precipitation seasonality. The number of veins was positively correlated with all the temperature variables. With regard to petiole size, petiole length was not correlated with temperature, but petiole width was negatively correlated with the annual temperature range; with respect to the precipitation variables, petiole length and width were negatively correlated with precipitation seasonality.

Figure 3 Graphs of Pearson’s correlations between leaf morphological traits and environmental variables. Only significant correlations are presented. Abbreviations of leaf morphological traits as indicated in Table 1

Among the micromorphological characters, the density of trichomes showed a negative correlation with latitude, temperature seasonality, precipitation of driest quarter, and potential evapotranspiration but a positive correlation with the aridity index. Stomatal density was correlated only with potential evapotranspiration, while stomatal aperture length was negatively correlated with latitude, potential evapotranspiration, precipitation of driest quarter, and three of the temperature variables (Table 2).

Table 2 The results of ANOVA for the differentiation of leaf morphological traits among populations of Quercus mexicana. Abbreviations of leaf morphological traits as indicated in Table 1. Degrees of freedom (df), sum of squares (ss), mean squares (ms) and F-values are indicated (*** P < 0.001, and * P < 0.05). 

df populations /df
residuals
ss populations / ss
residuals
ms populations / ms
residuals
F value
DTR 38 / 126 1.953 / 1.741 0.05139 / 0.01381 3.72***
STD 38 / 126 0.471 / 1.026 0.01239 / 0.00814 1.522*
STL 38 / 126 0.194 / 0.241 0.0051 / 0.00191 2.671***
LL 38 / 329 1.088 / 1.358 0.02862 / 0.00412 6.933***
LW 38 / 329 1.018 / 1.286 0.02679 / 0.0039 6.855***
LWr 38 / 329 0.579 / 0.859 0.01524 / 0.00261 5.836***
PL 38 / 329 1.571 / 4.128 0.04134 / 0.01255 3.295***
PW 38 / 329 1.115 / 1.163 0.02933 / 0.00353 8.298***
SLA 38 / 329 0.512 / 1.422 0.01349 / 0.00432 3.121***
NV 38 / 329 0.145 / 0.147 0.00381 / 0.00044 8.515***
LT 38 / 329 2.047 / 1.178 0.05386 / 0.00358 15.04***

Table 3 Results of Pearson’s correlations between environmental variables and leaf morphological traits. Abbreviations of leaf morphological traits as indicated in Table 1. Significant values: *** P < 0.001, ** P < 0.01 and * P < 0.05. 

Micromorphological traits Macromorphological traits
DTR STD STL LL LW LWr PL PW SLA NV LT
LAT -0.41*** 0.05 -0.18* 0.16** -0.04 0.29*** 0.12* 0.24*** 0.12* 0.49*** 0.44***
Precipitation AI 0.26*** -0.10 0.23** -0.15** -0.09 -0.07 -0.10* 0.01 -0.13* -0.36*** -0.18***
PET -0.36*** 0.17* -0.19* 0.21*** 0.15** 0.08 0.15** 0.17** 0.18*** 0.32*** 0.31***
AP 0 0 -0.11 0.04 0.09 -0.07 -0.15** 0.13* 0.07 -0.08 -0.02
PS 0.20** 0.05 -0.02 0.07 0.21*** -0.23*** -0.11** -0.18*** 0.07 -0.19*** -0.31***
PD -0.29*** -0.02 -0.21** 0.16** 0.09 0.08 -0.05 0.30*** 0.14** 0.22*** 0.25***
Temperature AMT -0.14 0.09 -0.22** 0.39*** 0.39*** -0.02 0.01 -0.04 0.20*** 0.22*** 0.04
TS -0.34*** 0.1 -0.25*** 0.31*** 0.26*** 0.07 0.07 0.13* 0.23*** 0.39*** 0.26***
ATR 0.06 0.08 -0.05 0.11* 0.16** -0.05 0 -0.19*** 0.11* 0.17** 0.02
MTC -0.06 0.08 -0.20* 0.38*** 0.39*** -0.05 0 -0.09 0.18*** 0.14** -0.03

The highest correlation scores with temperature variables were observed for annual mean temperature and temperature seasonality in relation to leaf length, leaf width, density of trichomes and number of veins. On the other hand, the water availability variable with the highest correlation scores was potential evapotranspiration in relation to the density of trichomes and number of veins.

Multivariate analyses. DFA of micromorphological traits (DFAMIC) explained 51.3 % of the variation for the first discriminant function (DF1), and 30.5 % for the second discriminant function (DF2, Figure 4A). For the DFAMAC, DF1 explained 42.4 % of the variation, and DF2 explained 24.1 % (Figure 4B). In the combined dataset, DFAMOR, the DF1 explained 30 % and DF2 explained 23.3 % of the differentiation among populations (Figure 4C). All the axes were significant according to Wilk’s lambda (Figure 4). From the three analyses, the highest percentage of accurate classification was obtained with DFAMOR (68.1 %). In the three DFAs, the populations from northern Sierra Madre Oriental together with others from Hidalgo formed a separate group (Figure 4). In the DFAMIC, the density of trichomes was the trait that contributed most to explaining the DF1, while stomatal length aperture explained the variation in DF2. In DFAMAC and DFAMOR, leaf thickness and leaf length presented the highest scores in discriminating populations.

Figure 4 Discriminant function analyses (DFA) and clustering analyses (CA) for A) micromorphological traits, B) macromorphological traits and C) combined both datasets. DFA based on morphological traits (left: letters a, b, c), groups identified in the CA (center: d, e, f) and DFA based on environmental differences (right: g, h, i) are presented. Percentage of explained variation of the first two discriminant functions and CC represent the percentage of correctly classified cases in DFA. *** P < 0.001, ** P < 0.01, * P < 0.05. Abbreviations of location as shown in Figure 1 (described in Appendix 1) and of morphological traits indicated in Table 1.  

The cluster analyses allowed us to identify five groups for micromorphological traits and three groups for macromorphological traits and another three for all the morphological traits (Figure 4). The first group of the cluster with all the morphological traits comprised populations from the northern of Sierra Madre Oriental and Altiplano and southern Sierra Madre Oriental regions (Figure 4C). The traits that characterized this first group were thin leaves (range 0.17 to 0.22 mm) and wide petioles (1.31 to 1.58) (DFAMOR, Figure 4C). The second group included populations from the Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt, the southeastern Sierra Madre Oriental and one in the north. This group was characterized by high density of trichomes (8.4 to 10.56 per mm2), large stomatal aperture (8.59 to 11.09 mm2), and short (4.35 to 5.26 cm) and narrow (1.55 to 1.86 cm) leaves (DFAMOR, Figure 4C). In the third group, most of the populations were located on the western slope of the southern Sierra Madre Oriental, in San Luis Potosí and some in the northernmost distribution (Figure 4C). The traits that characterized this group were long (5.67 to 7.29 cm) and wide (1.87 to 2.63 cm) leaves with low density of trichomes (3.5 to 7.49 per mm2).

DFA based on environmental variables for DFAMIC, explained 56.1 and 28.9 % of the variance via the first two discriminant functions, respectively; only the first function was significant (Figure 4A). The contribution of precipitation seasonality to the first discriminant axis was the most important for separating the populations; however, the groups were not recovered according to the morphofunctional traits, with 59 % of them correctly classified. For DFAMAC, the first two discriminant functions explained 62.7 and 37.3 % of the variance, and neither of them was significant. The analysis that best explained the variance of the discriminant functions was DFAMOR, with 78.8 and 21.2 % for the first two discriminant functions, respectively. However, only the first function was significant. The climatic variables of temperature seasonality and potential evapotranspiration were the most important for discriminating among populations according to DF1, and these variables characterized the group of populations of the western slope of the Sierra Madre Oriental. The northern Sierra Madre Oriental group was better explained by the aridity index; the Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt + southeastern Sierra Madre Oriental group was better explained by negative scores of annual precipitation (Figure 4C).

In the redundancy analyses, temperature-related variables explained 2.83 % (RDAMIC; P > 0.05), 4.77 % (RDAMAC: P < 0.001) and 5.45 % (RDAMOR: P < 0.001) of leaf variation, with significance in the last two analyses. Water-related variables significantly explained 5.0 % (RDAMIC; P < 0.05), 7.47 % (RDAMAC: P < 0.001) and 9.84 % (RDAMOR: P < 0.001) of the leaf variation. The interaction of temperature and water variables significantly explained 18.06 % (RDAMIC; P < 0.001), 17.01 % (RDAMAC: P < 0.001) and 20.83 % (RDAMOR: P < 0.001) of the leaf variation (Appendix 3). For the full RDA, the most important and significant environmental variable in RDAMIC was precipitation of driest quarter; for RDAMAC and RDAMOR the most important variables were precipitation seasonality, precipitation of driest quarter and the aridity index (Appendix 3). When plotting the full redundancy analysis results, precipitation seasonality and the aridity index were positively correlated with the density of trichomes. Potential evapotranspiration, precipitation of driest quarter, and temperature seasonality were negatively correlated with petiole width and leaf thickness (Figure 5).

Figure 5 Full redundancy analysis with the complete data set of morphological and environmental variables (RDAMOR). Purple letters represent morphological traits, orange letters represent temperature variables and blue letters represent precipitation variables. Dots in green indicate the populations of Quercus mexicana (abbreviations of localities are described in Appendix 1). Percentage of explained variation of each axis at *** P < 0.001. 

Discussion

Leaf morphological variability. Populations of Q. mexicana showed variable leaf traits along their distribution, with groups of similar traits, although some populations with similar traits are not geographically proximal. Variation in leaf traits over a wide distribution area and along environmental gradients has been detected in Q. rugosa (Uribe-Salas et al. 2008), Q. elliptica (Maya-García et al. 2020) and Q. deserticola (Rodríguez-Gómez et al. 2018). Leaf morphological variation at the landscape level has also been observed in Q. castanea (Lara-De la Cruz et al. 2020).

Specifically, the northern Sierra Madre Oriental populations showed the greatest differences and were more consistent with the recovered groups; in the correlation analyses, these populations showed most of the significant differences in leaf trait variation. Indeed, latitude was positively correlated with most of the traits evaluated. A correlation with a latitudinal trend has also been found in Q. rugosa (Uribe-Salas et al. 2008), in which shorter leaves were present in its northern distribution. The most important traits for differentiating the northern Sierra Madre Oriental group from the rest of the populations were leaf thickness and petiole width. Leaf thickness was the most significantly different trait among the populations; this trait was also the most differentiated for Q. castanea populations at the landscape level (Lara-De la Cruz et al. 2020).

Relationships with environmental factors. In Q. mexicana, all the leaf traits showed correlations with variables of precipitation and temperature, except for stomatal density. In several studies, leaf variability and geographical differentiation of Quercus species have also been correlated with environmental variables (e.g., Uribe-Salas et al. 2008, Rodríguez-Gómez et al. 2018, Maya-García et al. 2020).

In this study, leaf thickness was correlated with temperature seasonality, indicating its association with extreme temperatures, which coincides with the northern Sierra Madre Oriental populations, and thinner leaves were associated with less arid and more seasonal environments, coinciding with the Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt and southeastern Sierra Madre Oriental populations climate (Figure 2). Lara-De la Cruz et al. (2020) also found thinner leaves at drier sites in Q. castanea at the landscape level. Contrary to our findings, in Q. elliptica, thickness was positively correlated with precipitation seasonality (Maya-García et al. 2020). Higher tissue density and thickness are correlated with higher water content (Vendramini et al. 2002). At sites with lower water availability, leaves are generally characterized by higher tissue density (de la Riva et al. 2016). Thus, a higher tissue density is associated with more successful performance under water-limited conditions (Harzé et al. 2016), which would explain the greater thickness and petiole width characterizing the northern Sierra Madre Oriental populations.

The largest specific leaf area of Q. mexicana was identified at drier sites with higher evapotranspiration and at higher latitudes. This result contrasts with the expectations of a correlation between specific leaf area and rainfall (Gouveia & Freitas 2009). Commonly, a decrease in specific leaf area has been associated with drier sites (Aranda et al. 2014) and an increase in temperature (Lee et al. 2005) in different oak species. The specific leaf area of Q. mexicana was also correlated with temperature variables. In other plant species, high temperature has been shown to decrease water use efficiency but increases specific leaf area (Meier & Leuschner 2008). Similarly, in Q. elliptica, specific leaf area was associated with drier conditions (Maya-García et al. 2020).

The number of secondary veins showed significant differentiation among populations and a significant correlation with all the environmental variables. Vein density shows a high inter- and intraspecific variation, and a very diverse responses to a combination of environmental traits (Zhu et al. 2012). For instance, higher vein density has been associated with higher sun exposure (Sack & Frole 2006) and drier soils for some species (Dunbar‐Co et al. 2009). In other species, higher vein density is found under more humid conditions (Zhu et al. 2012). For Q. mexicana, the correlations suggested that leaves with a larger number of secondary veins were associated with humidity and less marked precipitation seasonality, but leaves with a larger number of secondary veins were also associated with higher potential evapotranspiration and more marked temperature seasonality.

Among the micromorphological traits, the density of trichomes was the trait that showed the highest discrimination coefficient among populations of Q. mexicana. Populations with the highest trichome density were identified at lower latitudes, at sites with marked precipitation seasonality and less evapotranspiration, characterizing the populations of the southern Sierra Madre Oriental and Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt (Figures 2, 3). Patterns of trichome density observed in other plant species indicate that greater density is associated with drier conditions (Pérez-Estrada et al. 2000, Benz & Martin 2006) or lower temperatures (Agrawal et al. 2004). Our results showed an inverse pattern of trichome density; for Q. mexicana lower trichome density characterized populations in the northern Sierra Madre Oriental located at sites with drier conditions and extreme high temperatures.

Although stomatal size and its density are relatively plastic traits (Richardson et al. 2001), we did not find significant differences among populations in stomatal density, nor did stomatal size or density show significant correlations with most of the environmental variables; only a significant correlation with potential evapotranspiration was found, as has been shown in other oak species (Nóbrega & Pereira 1992). Stomatal aperture length correlations with environmental variables indicate that larger stomata are associated with more humid conditions with less temperature seasonality. A small aperture length can provide a reduction in total pore area, facilitating faster closure in response to drier environments (Lawson & Blatt 2014), which would explain the presence of a larger stomatal aperture length in populations of the Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt and southeastern Sierra Madre Oriental, where the conditions are more humid than those of the northern Sierra Madre Oriental.

On the other hand, the relationships that are established between micro- and macromorphological traits and environmental variables are very interesting and can be summarized by the RDA. First, the densities of trichomes and stomata are better explained by the seasonality of temperature and the availability of water. The size of the leaves seems to respond to changes in temperature; larger leaves and wider petioles are found in places with extreme temperature conditions, and the seasonality of temperature seems to be a key variable in the morphological variation and differentiation of Q. mexicana populations. Global trends indicate that leaves are generally smaller at drier and warmer sites, or at colder and wetter sites (Wright et al. 2017). The presence of larger leaves under drier or colder conditions is possible because of the thermoregulatory capability of leaves (Meier & Leuschner 2008, Michaletz et al. 2016): larger leaves can warm up fast on colder mornings, allowing better photosynthetic performance (Wright et al. 2017).

Even though we found that morphology was significantly correlated with environmental variables, the RDAs explained a relatively low, although significant percentage of the variation, specifically, when temperature and water variables were considered separately. This finding may be due to multiple factors, such as weak selection, extensive gene flow among populations (Riordan et al. 2016) or the effect of other environmental variables on populations, such as geomorphology or soil types (Wright et al. 2017). The global patterns of leaf change in relation to climatic variables also explain a small but significant amount of the variation, according to the evaluation of Wright et al. (2017).

To better understand the observed relationship between morphology and environmental variation and to assess if any of the aforementioned factors affect this relationship, it is necessary to assess the extent of genetic differentiation among the Q. mexicana populations. For example, in Q. deserticola, leaf variation is correlated with the environmental gradient of the Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt but not with the genetic variation of the populations; phenotypic plasticity, common ancestry or adaptative differences could explain the environmental responses of the leaf variation (Rodríguez-Gómez et al. 2018).

Potential impacts of climate change. The morphological variability and differentiation among populations indicate species adaptability to environmental changes. Our results show a wide range of responses of Q. mexicana populations given the high environmental diversity of the distribution range of the species. Some trait variations seem to be restricted to specific climatic conditions or geographical areas, while other traits vary throughout the range without a specific pattern.

In Mexico, oak species have been moderately impacted by recurring climate changes caused by decreases in temperature coupled with conditions of moderated humidity throughout the Tertiary and Quaternary (Graham 1993). Palynological records indicated recurrent expansion-contraction changes in the communities of temperate plants during the Pleistocene (1.8 Ma to 10,000 years ago) in central Mexico (Lozano-García & Vázquez-Selem 2005). These outcomes suggested that species must have survived Pleistocene glaciations in areas with favorable climates at lower altitudes in the mountain major ranges of Mexico, and migration to higher elevations would have occurred during warm periods (Toledo 1982, Metcalfe et al. 2010). The effects of these climatic fluctuations on oak species in Mexico lead to more diversity and less genetic structure but larger historical population sizes and a complex exchange among species (González-Rodríguez et al. 2004, Tovar-Sánchez et al. 2008).

A recent assessment of the climatic trends between 1910 and 2009 in Mexico (Cuervo-Robayo et al. 2020) indicates that warmer and drier conditions can be expected in the species distribution area in the future. The Mexican Transition Zone, which includes the Sierra Madre Oriental and the Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt, showed an increase of 0.03 °C in the annual mean temperature between 1950 and 2009 and a decrease of 12 mm in annual rainfall. If these trends continue, it is probable that populations of Q. mexicana adapted to drought or extreme temperatures will respond better to these climate changes. However, populations with morphological traits best adapted to humid conditions could be negatively affected.

Morphological and functional leaf traits show a plastic response in plants. In Q. mexicana, apart from plasticity, other factors could influence the variation in these traits. In the case of this endemic species, populations could face pressures from future climate changes, and a reduction in phenotypic plasticity and, consequently the genetic diversity of the species can be expected. Integrating data on the genetic structure of the species could provide a complete perspective on the future outcome for this endemic oak.

Acknowledgements

This paper was improved by the revisions of two anonymous reviewers. We thank Víctor Rocha Ramírez, Esther Aguilar, Rafael Aguilar Romero, Celia Sanginés and Cristopher Ortega for technical assistance in the field work. This paper constitutes a partial fulfillment of the Graduate Program in Biological Sciences of the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM) by VSA. VSA received a Ph.D. scholarship 348092 from CONACyT. This project was supported by PAPIIT/PAPIME-DGAPA (UNAM) project RV201015, IA208218, PE216619 and CONACYT 240136.

Literature cited

Agrawal AA, Conner JK, Stinchcombe JR. 2004. Evolution of plant resistance and tolerance to frost damage. Ecology Letters 7: 1199-1208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00680.x [ Links ]

Albarrán-Lara AL, Petit RJ, Kremer A, Caron H, Peñaloza-Ramírez JM, Gugger PF, Dávila-Aranda PD, Oyama K. 2019. Low genetic differentiation between two morphologically and ecologically distinct giant-leaved Mexican oaks. Plant Systematics and Evolution 305: 89-101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-018-1554-8 [ Links ]

Albert CH, Thuiller W, Yoccoz NG, Douzet R, Aubert S, Lavorel S. 2010. A multi-trait approach reveals the structure and the relative importance of intra- vs. interspecific variability in plant traits. Functional Ecology 24: 1192-120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2010.01727.x [ Links ]

Aranda I, Ramírez-Valiente J, Rodríguez-Calcerrada J. 2014. Integridad funcional en la respuesta a sequía de las especies del género Quercus sp. Ecosistemas 23: 27-36. [ Links ]

Benz BW, Martin CE. 2006. Foliar trichomes, boundary layers, and gas exchange in 12 species of epiphytic Tillandsia (Bromeliaceae). Journal of Plant Physiology 163: 648-656. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2005.05.008 [ Links ]

Casson S, Gray JE. 2008. Influence of environmental factors on stomatal development. New Phytologist 178: 9-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02351.x [ Links ]

Cuervo-Robayo AP, Ureta C, Gómez-Albores MA, Meneses-Mosquera AK, Téllez-Valdés O, Martínez-Meyer E. 2020. One hundred years of climate change in Mexico. PLoS ONE 15: e0209808. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209808 [ Links ]

de la Riva EG, Olmo M, Poorter H, Ubera JL, Villar R. 2016. Leaf mass per area (LMA) and its relationship with leaf structure and anatomy in 34 Mediterranean woody species along a water availability gradient. Plos One 11: e0148788. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148788 [ Links ]

Dunbar-Co S, Sporck MJ, Sack L. 2009. Leaf trait diversification and design in seven rare taxa of the Hawaiian Plantago. International Journal of Plant Sciences 170: 61-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/593111 [ Links ]

González-Rodríguez A, Arias DM, Valencia-Á. S, Oyama K. 2004. Morphological and RAPD analysis of hybridization between Quercus affinis and Q. laurina (Fagaceae), two Mexican red oaks. American Journal of Botany 91: 401-409. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.91.3.401 [ Links ]

Gouveia AC, Freitas H. 2009. Modulation of leaf attributes and water use efficiency in Quercus suber along a rainfall gradient. Trees 23: 267-275. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-008-0274-z [ Links ]

Graham A. 1993. Historical factors and biodiversity in Mexico. In: Ramammoorthy TP, Bye R, Fa J, eds. Biological Diversity of Mexico: Origins and Distribution. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 109-127. ISBN: 0-19-506674-X [ Links ]

Harzé M, Mahy G, Monty A. 2016. Functional traits are more variable at the intra-than inter-population level: a study of four calcareous dry-grassland plant species. Tuexenia 36: 321-336. [ Links ]

Henn JJ, Buzzard V, Enquist BJ, Halbritter AH, Klanderud K, Maitner BS, Michaletz ST, Pötsch C, Seltzer L, Telford RJ, Yang Y, Zhang L, Vandvik V. 2018. Intraspecific trait variation and phenotypic plasticity mediate alpine plant species response to climate change. Frontiers in Plant Science 9: 1548. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01548 [ Links ]

Hernández CM, Carrasco AG. 2004. Climatología. In: Luna-Vega I, Morrone J, Espinosa-Organista D, eds. Biodiversidad de la Sierra Madre Oriental. México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Facultad de Ciencias, pp. 63-108. ISBN: 970-32-1526-2 [ Links ]

Hetherington AM, Woodward FI. 2003. The role of stomata in sensing and driving environmental change. Nature 424: 901-908. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01843 [ Links ]

Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG, Jarvis A. 2005. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. International Journal of Climatology 25: 1965-1978. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1276 [ Links ]

Iwata H. Ukai Y. 2002. SHAPE: a computer program package for quantitative evaluation of biological shapes based on elliptic Fourier descriptors. Journal of Heredity 93: 384-385. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/93.5.384 [ Links ]

Körner C, Basler D, Hoch G, Kollas C, Lenz A, Randin CF, Vitasse Y, Zimmermann NE. 2016. Where, why and how? Explaining the low-temperature range limits of temperate tree species. Journal of Ecology 104: 1076-1088. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12574 [ Links ]

Laforest-Lapointe I, Martínez-Vilalta J, Retana J. 2014. Intraspecific variability in functional traits matters: case study of Scots pine. Oecologia 175: 1337-1348. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-014-2967-x [ Links ]

Lara-De La Cruz LI, García-Oliva F, Oyama K, González-Rodríguez A. 2020. Association of functional trait variation of Quercus castanea with temperature and water availability gradients at the landscape level. Botanical Sciences 98: 16-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17129/BOTSCI.2449 [ Links ]

Lawson T, Blatt MR. 2014. Stomatal size, speed, and responsiveness impact on photosynthesis and water use efficiency. Plant Physiology 164: 1556-1570. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.114.237107 [ Links ]

Lee TD, Reich PB, Bolstad PV. 2005. Acclimation of leaf respiration to temperature is rapid and related to specific leaf area, soluble sugars and leaf nitrogen across three temperate deciduous tree species. Functional Ecology 19: 640-647. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2005.01023.x [ Links ]

Lozano-García S, Vázquez-Selem L. 2005. A high elevation Holocene pollen record from Iztaccihuatl volcano, Central Mexico. The Holocene 15: 329-338. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/0959683605hl814rp [ Links ]

Martínez-Blancas A, Martorell C. 2020. Changes in niche differentiation and environmental filtering over a hydric stress gradient. Journal of Plant Ecology 13: 185-194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jpe/rtz061 [ Links ]

Maya-García R, Torres-Miranda CA, Cuevas-Reyes P, Oyama K. 2020. Morphological differentiation among populations of Quercus elliptica Neé (Fagaceae) along an environmental gradient in Mexico and Central America. Botanical Sciences 98: 50-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17129/botsci.2395 [ Links ]

Meier IC, Leuschner C. 2008. Leaf size and leaf area index in Fagus sylvatica forests: Competing effects of precipitation, temperature, and nitrogen availability. Ecosystems 11: 655-669. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-008-9135-2 [ Links ]

Metcalfe DB, Meir P, Aragão LE, Lobo-do-Vale R, Galbraith D, Fisher RA, Chaves MM, Maroco JP, da Costa ACL, de Almeida SS, Braga AP, Goncalves PHL, de Athaydes J, da Costa M, Portela TT, de Oliveira AAR, Malhi Y, Williams M. 2010. Shifts in plant respiration and carbon use efficiency at a large-scale drought experiment in the eastern Amazon. New Phytologist 187: 608-621. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03319.x [ Links ]

Michaletz ST, Weiser MD, McDowell NG, Zhou J, Kaspari M, Helliker BR, Enquist BJ. 2016. The energetic and carbon economic origins of leaf thermoregulation. Nature Plants 2: 1-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nplants.2016.129 [ Links ]

Moles AT, Perkins SE, Laffan SW, Flores-Moreno H, Awasthy M, Tindall ML, Sack L, Pitman A, Kattge J, Aarssen LW, Anand M, Bahn M, Blonder B, CavenderBares J, Hans J, Cornelissen C, Cornwell WC, Díaz S, Dickie JB, Freschet GT, Griffiths JG, Gutierrez AG, Hemmings FA, Hickler T, Hitchcock TD, Keighery M, Kleyer M, Kurokawa H, Leishman MR, Liu K, Niinemets U, Onipchenko V, Onoda Y, Peñuelas J, Pillar VD, Reich PB, Shiodera S, Siefert A, SosinskiJr EE, Soudzilovskaia NA, Swaine EK, Swenson NG, van Bodegom PM, Warman L, Weiher E, Wright IJ, Zhang H, Zobel M, Bonser SP. 2014. Which is a better predictor of plant traits: temperature or precipitation? Journal of Vegetation Science 25: 1167-1180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12190 [ Links ]

Niinemets Ü. 2001. Global-scale climatic controls of leaf dry mass per area, density, and thickness in trees and shrubs. Ecology 82: 453-469. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[0453:GSCCOL]2.0.CO;2 [ Links ]

Nóbrega CM, Pereira JS. 1992. Gradients of anatomy and morphology of leaves in the crowns of cork oak. Scientia gerundensis 18: 53. [ Links ]

Pérez-Estrada LB, Cano-Santana Z, Oyama K. 2000. Variation in leaf trichomes of Wigandia urens: environmental factors and physiological consequences. Tree Physiology 20: 629-632. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/20.9.629 [ Links ]

Pérez-Mojica E, Valencia-Á. S. 2017. Estudio preliminar del género Quercus (Fagaceae) en Tamaulipas, México. Acta Botanica Mexicana 120: 59-111. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21829/abm120.2017.1264 [ Links ]

Pollock LJ, Morris WK, Vesk PA. 2012. The role of functional traits in species distributions revealed through a hierarchical model. Ecography 35: 716-725. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2011.07085.x [ Links ]

R Core Team. 2016. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.r-project.org/Links ]

Richardson AD, Ashton PMS, Berlyn GP, McGroddy ME, Cameron IR. 2001. Within-crown foliar plasticity of western hemlock, Tsuga heterophylla, in relation to stand age. Annals of Botany 88: 1007-1015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.2001.1538 [ Links ]

Riordan EC, Gugger PF, Ortego J, Smith C, Gaddis K, Thompson P, Sork VL. 2016. Association of genetic and phenotypic variability with geography and climate in three southern California oaks. American Journal of Botany 103: 73-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1500135 [ Links ]

Rodríguez-Gómez F, Oyama K, Ochoa-Orozco M, Mendoza-Cuenca L, Gaytán-Legaria R, & González-Rodríguez A. 2018. Phylogeography and climate-associated morphological variation in the endemic white oak Quercus deserticola (Fagaceae) along the Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt. Botany 96: 121-133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/cjb-2017-0116 [ Links ]

Sack L, Frole K. 2006. Leaf structural diversity is related to hydraulic capacity in tropical rain forest trees. Ecology 87: 483-491. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1890/05-0710 [ Links ]

Schilmiller AL, Last RL, Pichersky E. 2008. Harnessing plant trichome biochemistry for the production of useful compounds. The Plant Journal 54: 702-711. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03432.x [ Links ]

Stahl U, Reu B, Wirth C. 2014. Predicting species’ range limits from functional traits for the tree flora of North America. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 111: 13739-13744. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1300673111 [ Links ]

Tang CQ, Ohsawa M. 1999. Altitudinal distribution of evergreen broad-leaved trees and their leaf-size pattern on a humid subtropical mountain, Mt. Emei, Sichuan, China. Plant Ecology 145: 221-233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009856020744 [ Links ]

Toledo VM. 1982. Pleistocene changes of vegetation in tropical México. In: Prance GT, ed. Biological Diversification in the Tropics. Nueva York: Columbia University Press, pp. 93-111. ISBN: 0-231-04876-9 [ Links ]

Tovar-Sánchez E, Mussali-Galante P, Esteban-Jiménez R, Piñero D, Arias DM, Dorado O, Oyama K. 2008. Chloroplast DNA polymorphism reveals geographic structure and introgression in the Quercus crassifolia × Quercus crassipes hybrid complex in Mexico. Botany 86: 228-239. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/B07-128 [ Links ]

Trabucco A, Zomer RJ. 2009. Global Aridity Index (Global-Aridity) and Global Potential Evapotranspiration (Global-pet) Geospatial Database. CGIAR Consortium for Spatial Information. CGIAR-CSI GeoPortal online. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.7504448.v3 [ Links ]

Uribe-Salas D, Sáenz-Romero C, González-Rodríguez A, Téllez-Valdéz O, Oyama K. 2008. Foliar morphological variation in the white oak Quercus rugosa Née (Fagaceae) along a latitudinal gradient in Mexico: Potential implications for management and conservation. Forest Ecology and Management 256: 2121-2126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2008.08.002 [ Links ]

Valencia-Á. S. 2004. Diversidad del género Quercus (Fagaceae) en México. Boletín de la Sociedad Botánica de México 75: 33-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17129/botsci.1692 [ Links ]

Valladares F, Matesanz S, Guilhaumon F, Araújo MB, Balaguer L, Benito‐Garzón M, Cornwel W, Gianoli E, van Kleunen M, Naya DE, Nicotra AB, Poorter H, Zavala MA. 2014. The effects of phenotypic plasticity and local adaptation on forecasts of species range shifts under climate change. Ecology Letters 17: 1351-1364. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12348 [ Links ]

Vendramini F, Díaz S, Gurvich DE, Wilson PJ, Thompson K, Hodgson JG. 2002. Leaf traits as indicators of resource-use strategy in floras with succulent species. New Phytologist 154: 147-157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2002.00357.x [ Links ]

Ward JH, Hook ME. 1963. Application of a hierarchical grouping procedure to a problem of grouping profiles. Educational and Psychological Measurement 23: 69-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446302300107 [ Links ]

Wright IJ, Dong N, Maire V, Prentice IC, Westoby M, Díaz S, Gallagher RV, Jacobs BF, Kooyman R, Law EA, Leishman MR, Niinemets Ü, Reich PB, Sack L, Villar R, Wang H, Wilf P. 2017. Global climatic drivers of leaf size. Science 357: 917. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aal4760 [ Links ]

Yan W, Zhong Y, Shangguan Z. 2017. Contrasting responses of leaf stomatal characteristics to climate change: a considerable challenge to predict carbon and water cycles. Global Change Biology 23: 3781-3793. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13654 [ Links ]

Zhu Y, Kang H, Xie Q, Wang Z, Yin S, Liu C. 2012. Pattern of leaf vein density and climate relationship of Quercus variabilis populations remains unchanged with environmental changes. Trees 26: 597-607. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-011-0624-0 [ Links ]

Appendix 1

Localities of populations of Quercus mexicana sampled for this study. 

Population Name of the locality Elevation (m) Latitude Longitude Aridity index
G1 Palomas, Guanajuato 1,860 21.39640 -99.89830 0.2239
G2 Xichú, Guanajuato 1,939 21.29510 -99.88830 0.2151
G3 Atarjea, Guanajuato 2,119 21.18930 -99.89180 0.3316
H1 Mineral del Chico, Hidalgo 2,806 20.14250 -98.69390 0.3923
H2 Cardonal, Hidalgo 2,364 20.67260 -99.14310 0.2873
H3 Cerro Prieto, Hidalgo 2,114 20.80370 -99.19970 0.3069
H4 Jacala, Hidalgo 1,921 20.91900 -99.20940 0.3641
H5 La Colorada, Hidalgo 1,677 21.02410 -99.13110 0.3906
H6 Zimapán, Hidalgo 2,132 20.79380 -99.32900 0.2483
H7 Apulco, Hidalgo 2,187 20.29770 -98.34530 0.3779
M1 Magú, Estado de México 2,396 19.68500 -99.31750 0.3043
M2 Jilotepec, Estado de México 2,512 19.92820 -99.55720 0.3487
N1 Laguna de Sánchez, Nuevo León 1,960 25.32250 -100.25840 0.2634
N2 Bosque Escuela, Nuevo León 1,619 24.70690 -99.86110 0.2232
N3 Pablillo, Nuevo León 2,131 24.59260 -99.97700 0.2592
N4 Puerto las Ánimas, Nuevo León 2,335 24.46710 -99.91170 0.2876
N5 San Josecito, Nuevo León 2,577 23.92670 -99.96240 0.2572
N6 Peña Nevada, Nuevo León 2,637 23.82380 -99.87980 0.2939
P1 Nicolás Bravo, Puebla 1,836 18.60450 -97.29620 0.3124
P2 El Seco, Puebla 2,480 19.11220 -97.57540 0.2399
P3 Tetela de Ocampo, Puebla 2,052 19.81000 -97.76480 0.3761
P4 Chignahuapan, Puebla 2,439 19.77470 -98.16360 0.2426
P5 Cuauhtémoc, Puebla 2,373 19.80540 -98.08140 0.2512
Q1 Landa de Matamoros, Querétaro 1,688 21.25060 -99.18750 0.4726
Q2 El Madroño, Querétaro 1,853 21.27930 -99.17000 0.5083
Q3 Pinal de Amoles, Querétaro 2,122 21.15440 -99.60800 0.3444
Q4 Cerro Pinguical, Querétaro 2,553 21.12510 -99.67830 0.4153
Q5 Cadereyta, Querétaro 2,289 20.87640 -99.59540 0.3917
Q6 San Joaquín, Querétaro 2,406 20.93230 -99.55560 0.4311
Q7 Cerro Boludo, Querétaro 2,255 20.92960 -99.52780 0.4379
S1 Guadalcázar, San Luis Potosí 1,999 22.66740 -100.41700 0.2014
S2 Valle de los Fantasmas, San Luis Potosí 2,340 22.09620 -100.65930 0.1411
S3 San Luis Potosí, San Luis Potosí 2,046 22.05520 -100.58100 0.1760
S4 Armadillos de los Infantes, San Luis Potosí 1,920 22.18840 -100.68790 0.1485
S5 Real de Catorce, San Luis Potosí 2,876 23.60610 -100.86710 0.1491
T1 Lázaro Cárdenas, Tlaxcala 2,460 19.55080 -97.96310 0.2489
T2 El Verde, Tlaxcala 2,296 19.33060 -98.45980 0.2634
T3 Atotonilco, Tlaxcala 2,389 19.38920 -98.45260 0.2766
V1 Agua Bendita, Veracruz 2,124 20.36910 -98.51540 0.4273

Appendix 2

Means and standard deviations of all morphological traits of the 39 populations of Quercus mexicana. Abbreviations of the populations as in Appendix 1 and for morphological traits as indicated in Table 1.  

Pop DTR
(No/mm2)
STD
(No/mm2)
STL
(mm)
LL
(cm)
LW
(cm)
LWr PL
(cm)
PW
(cm)
SLA
(g/cm2)
NV LT
(mm)
G1 5.794 / 1.275 392.604 / 66.872 8.028 / 1.808 5.5921 / 1.1148 2.0354 / 0.4142 2.846 / 0.422 0.4825 / 0.1332 0.1087 / 0.0404 69.823 / 7.842 13.156 / 1.021 0.28 / 0.048
G2 5.998 / 0.57 311.902 / 73.401 8.381 / 1.687 6.0126 / 1.0175 2.0986 / 0.3844 2.982 / 0.498 0.4863 / 0.1173 0.1125 / 0.0329 75.895 / 16.7 13.36 / 1.588 0.241 / 0.044
G3 5.907 / 1.812 316.264 / 62.076 8.887 / 1.706 6.313 / 1.0589 2.2476 / 0.3502 2.861 / 0.396 0.5968 / 0.1608 0.1302 / 0.0436 77.638 / 12.211 12.889 / 1.655 0.265 / 0.044
H1 8.009 / 1.704 343.529 / 50.763 9.004 / 1.47 5.2668 / 1.0665 1.6786 / 0.2913 3.273 / 0.471 0.697 / 0.2023 0.1263 / 0.0487 80.94 / 16.298 11.64 / 1.258 0.279 / 0.076
H2 3.992 / 2.098 344.308 / 80.844 9 / 1.909 5.6735 / 1.1733 1.9035 / 0.2981 2.916 / 0.422 0.5443 / 0.1892 0.1333 / 0.0368 77.037 / 18.435 12.14 / 1.212 0.256 / 0.039
H3 7.907 / 1.329 407.872 / 79.619 9.749 / 2.017 5.6151 / 1.1343 1.9089 / 0.4095 2.899 / 0.349 0.5906 / 0.1501 0.1289 / 0.0481 71.087 / 12.748 12.778 / 1.223 0.183 / 0.03
H4 4.544 / 1.113 321.717 / 52.415 9.718 / 1.608 7.2954 / 1.5236 2.631 / 0.5565 2.789 / 0.343 0.5626 / 0.2217 0.1216 / 0.0513 78.499 / 24.887 12.88 / 1.662 0.174 / 0.05
H5 6.543 / 2.955 318.446 / 62.363 9.084 / 1.897 6.3986 / 1.1821 2.2187 / 0.4054 3.055 / 0.472 0.5506 / 0.2044 0.1422 / 0.0327 79.438 / 14.978 11.98 / 1.237 0.279 / 0.053
H6 7.634 / 2.281 381.698 / 75.949 8.704 / 1.45 6.1099 / 1.0355 2.1641 / 0.3368 2.926 / 0.355 0.499 / 0.1399 0.1197 / 0.0408 78.478 / 12.523 12.6 / 1.784 0.246 / 0.036
H7 6.362 / 1.113 356.252 / 118.8 8.541 / 1.764 5.1383 / 1.0352 1.7956 / 0.3941 3.049 / 0.455 0.5152 / 0.1709 0.1353 / 0.0317 71.937 / 14.969 11.422 / 1.469 0.225 / 0.039
M1 8.452 / 3.752 359.887 / 27.804 9.79 / 2.097 5.2381 / 0.8897 1.6285 / 0.2252 3.337 / 0.51 0.6068 / 0.1813 0.0945 / 0.0359 76.664 / 14.762 12.6 / 2.06 0.241 / 0.037
M2 7.157 / 0.94 376.246 / 76.106 9.361 / 1.455 4.7339 / 0.7143 1.6869 / 0.3392 3.086 / 0.501 0.4739 / 0.1391 0.131 / 0.038 83.758 / 14.952 13.72 / 1.565 0.182 / 0.039
N1 7.225 / 1.413 403.51 / 42.936 8.713 / 1.908 5.2196 / 0.9576 1.6703 / 0.3362 3.324 / 0.481 0.5582 / 0.1353 0.1378 / 0.0349 72.426 / 31.906 14.174 / 2.224 0.2 / 0.033
N2 3.522 / 0.513 336.258 / 54.492 8.713 / 1.525 6.4937 / 1.423 1.8954 / 0.3869 3.516 / 0.468 0.46 / 0.1452 0.1303 / 0.0322 87.066 / 15.736 14.378 / 1.898 0.173 / 0.032
N3 3.976 / 0.797 327.17 / 31.608 8.838 / 1.759 7.1483 / 1.4268 2.0479 / 0.3813 3.681 / 0.602 0.6563 / 0.1943 0.1265 / 0.0332 79.016 / 17.047 15.26 / 1.882 0.192 / 0.034
N4 6.816 / 0.862 327.17 / 60.13 9.221 / 1.797 5.5534 / 0.9871 1.5976 / 0.3244 3.789 / 0.564 0.4939 / 0.1277 0.1354 / 0.0421 78.437 / 13.922 15.58 / 1.885 0.185 / 0.034
N5 4.771 / 0.862 303.541 / 50.41 9.185 / 1.87 4.6277 / 0.7657 1.5542 / 0.2805 3.076 / 0.326 0.5206 / 0.1175 0.0995 / 0.0274 66.186 / 8.777 13.275 / 1.485 0.234 / 0.033
N6 4.998 / 0.704 310.812 / 51.5 8.716 / 1.475 4.4915 / 0.9527 1.6378 / 0.3608 3.014 / 0.588 0.4575 / 0.193 0.1343 / 0.0368 76.611 / 10.096 13.471 / 1.689 0.179 / 0.032
P1 8.634 / 1.862 239.925 / 45.752 11.095 / 2.518 4.3556 / 1.1594 1.721 / 0.304 2.642 / 0.298 0.3193 / 0.1053 0.1143 / 0.0407 69.257 / 11.535 10.629 / 1.477 0.307 / 0.068
P2 10.565 / 2.683 341.711 / 59.199 8.642 / 2.259 5.0959 / 0.6614 1.7479 / 0.4473 3.186 / 0.603 0.4592 / 0.1244 0.1038 / 0.0383 67.532 / 18.844 12.88 / 2.201 0.291 / 0.058
P3 7.498 / 1.879 287.183 / 76.702 9.197 / 1.663 5.1335 / 1.2579 1.8028 / 0.4058 2.97 / 0.331 0.4702 / 0.1653 0.1159 / 0.0568 76.323 / 19.804 12.218 / 1.031 0.301 / 0.076
P4 10.224 / 2.769 285.729 / 93.624 8.59 / 2.134 5.0986 / 0.6526 2.0504 / 0.3115 2.582 / 0.349 0.48 / 0.1326 0.0996 / 0.0306 63.133 / 6.629 11.86 / 1.107 0.283 / 0.04
P5 9.031 / 3.402 370.793 / 32.105 9.591 / 2.099 4.9722 / 1.0411 1.8652 / 0.415 2.703 / 0.423 0.5033 / 0.1458 0.1075 / 0.0347 64.033 / 8.813 11.222 / 1.46 0.275 / 0.047
Q1 6.702 / 1.323 261.736 / 41.955 8.233 / 1.319 5.896 / 1.2316 2.2709 / 0.4319 2.646 / 0.33 0.5075 / 0.1531 0.1191 / 0.036 77.892 / 15.627 12.24 / 1.08 0.281 / 0.055
Q2 6.816 / 1.879 287.183 / 46.61 9.502 / 1.834 5.9082 / 1.0694 2.2256 / 0.4285 2.773 / 0.388 0.516 / 0.1956 0.1322 / 0.0413 71.042 / 13.507 12.675 / 1.095 0.214 / 0.067
Q3 7.384 / 1.799 338.076 / 112.281 8.274 / 1.787 6.3867 / 1.3424 2.1795 / 0.5791 3.018 / 0.437 0.5319 / 0.1508 0.1169 / 0.0389 80.274 / 14.235 13.311 / 1.474 0.264 / 0.049
Q4 8.52 / 2.683 334.441 / 45.578 8.731 / 1.624 5.8818 / 1.0165 2.1336 / 0.296 2.863 / 0.398 0.5375 / 0.1541 0.1376 / 0.055 70.084 / 14.625 12.275 / 1.664 0.271 / 0.047
Q5 8.588 / 4.246 390.423 / 37.303 8.046 / 1.46 4.4205 / 0.8421 1.7337 / 0.4223 2.693 / 0.358 0.3776 / 0.1395 0.092 / 0.0296 74.837 / 7.653 12.86 / 1.485 0.235 / 0.036
Q6 7.952 / 2.184 399.875 / 45.578 7.749 / 1.366 5.4635 / 1.0438 1.8706 / 0.2935 3.004 / 0.425 0.4703 / 0.0997 0.1114 / 0.0532 74.726 / 11.791 13.267 / 1.195 0.262 / 0.044
Q7 8.747 / 2.086 359.887 / 81.319 8.007 / 1.832 4.9914 / 1.007 1.8092 / 0.306 2.917 / 0.436 0.3523 / 0.1191 0.1585 / 0.0442 75.112 / 16.535 12.709 / 1.329 0.242 / 0.041
S1 10.769 / 3.388 355.525 / 47.911 9.106 / 1.818 5.9741 / 1.2052 1.909 / 0.4515 3.235 / 0.478 0.6536 / 0.1943 0.1129 / 0.0443 75.046 / 13.3 13.76 / 1.117 0.263 / 0.043
S2 6.134 / 1.493 359.887 / 68.974 8.529 / 1.774 6.0559 / 1.3826 2.1064 / 0.4883 2.8 / 0.482 0.5327 / 0.1677 0.1134 / 0.0475 89.336 / 14.586 13.92 / 2.078 0.225 / 0.048
S3 5.725 / 2.486 296.634 / 42.518 8.452 / 1.359 5.7303 / 1.3163 2.2946 / 0.443 2.731 / 0.424 0.5046 / 0.1856 0.112 / 0.044 83.732 / 12.361 12.78 / 1.183 0.291 / 0.086
S4 8.52 / 2.467 361.705 / 73.455 8.62 / 1.695 5.7973 / 1.2058 2.1037 / 0.4714 2.817 / 0.385 0.5975 / 0.1783 0.1134 / 0.0333 73.031 / 11.168 12.44 / 1.248 0.277 / 0.048
S5 7.157 / 2.101 321.717 / 61.595 9.493 / 1.686 4.4635 / 0.8355 1.7054 / 0.3208 2.863 / 0.476 0.533 / 0.1079 0.1384 / 0.0461 62.188 / 8.621 11.4 / 1.074 0.217 / 0.033
T1 9.656 / 2.338 332.623 / 27.373 9.767 / 1.769 4.556 / 0.688 1.8031 / 0.33016 2.582 / 0.338 0.5165 / 0.1886 0.1096 / 0.0372 63.739 / 9.719 10.06 / 1.132 0.324 / 0.087
T2 10.338 / 3.842 287.183 / 57.982 10.584 / 1.733 5.5196 / 0.8632 1.8148 / 0.2922 3.189 / 0.4 0.5074 / 0.1496 0.1142 / 0.0265 72.943 / 9.799 11.92 / 1.259 0.242 / 0.044
T3 7.498 / 1.181 351.163 / 74.527 9.068 / 1.584 5.1321 / 1.6556 1.8176 / 0.3127 3.145 / 0.544 0.5361 / 0.1211 0.1246 / 0.0332 75.752 / 28.49 12.31 / 1.906 0.257 / 0.073
V1 8.406 / 2.538 270.824 / 92.13 8.401 / 1.57 5.0751 / 1.2306 2.0387 / 0.4175 2.58 / 0.395 0.5141 / 0.1558 0.1025 / 0.0326 64.196 / 11.755 11.114 / 1.623 0.301 / 0.054

Appendix 3

Partial redundancy analyses for micromorphological traits (RDAMIC), macromorphological traits (RDAMAC) and both set of traits (RDAMOR) including temperature-related variables (pRDA1) and water availability-related variables (pRDA2); and full redundancy analysis (fullRDA) including all environmental variables. Total and constrained variance (λ), and F statistic (P < 0.001***, P < 0.01** and P < 0.05*) of axes 1 and 2 and environmental variables included in the analysis and respective R2adj. Percentage of constrained variance (λ%) indicates the proportion of morphological variation explained by the environmental variables. Those variables or axes with higher statistical significance are in bold. Abbreviations of morphological traits as indicated in Table 1

RDAMIC RDAMAC RDAMOR
λ % F λ % F λ % F
pRDA1 (Temperature) Total 0.0343 100 0.0534 100 0.0864 100
Constrained 0.001 2.83 1.3384 0.0025 4.77 6.45*** 0.0047 5.45 2.63***
R2adj 0. 007 0.038 0.035
Axis 1 0.0008 87.17 4.69 0.0018 72.29 14.88*** 0.0037 78.08 8.22***
Axis 2 0.0001 0.97 0.52 0.0006 22.13 4.56* 0.0007 15.81 1.67
Cumulative 0.0009 96.85 0.0024 94.42 0.0044 93.89
AMT 0.0001 12.41 0.66 0.0012 48.14 9.91*** 0.0026 54.99 5.79***
TS 0.0003 30.44 1.63 0.0004 17.01 3.50** 0.0006 12.26 1.29
ATR 0.0004 44.93 2.40 0.0005 21.64 4.45** 0.001 21.67 2.28*
MTC 0.0001 12.21 0.65 0.0003 13.21 2.72* 0.0005 11.07 1.17
pRDA2 (Water availability) Total 0.0343 100 0.0534 100 0.0864 100
Constrained 0.0017 5.00 1.89* 0.004 7.47 6.45*** 0.0085 9.84 3.80***
R2adj 0.024 0.063 0.074
Axis 1 0.0011 62.51 5.99 0.0027 66.21 21.35*** 0.0059 69.55 13.23***
Axis 2 0.0005 28.94 2.77 0.001 24.33 7.85** 0.0015 17.8 3.38
Cumulative 0.0016 91.45 0.0037 90.55 0.0074 87.35
AI 0.0005 27.21 2.58 0.0014 34.53 11.13*** 0.0032 38.08 7.24***
PET 0.0007 39.36 3.72* 0.0007 17.54 5.66*** 0.0016 18.7 3.56**
AP 0.0005 28.3 2.67 0.0009 23.65 7.63*** 0.0019 22.95 4.36**
PS 0.0000 1.71 0.16 0.0006 14.36 4.63** 0.0006 7.52 1.43
PD 0.0000 3.39 0.32 0.0004 9.88 3.19* 0.0011 1.27 2.43*
Full RDA (Temperature + Water) Total 0.0343 100 0.0534 100 0.0864 100
Constrained 0.0062 18.06 3.80*** 0.0091 17.01 8.15*** 0.018 20.83 4.47***
R2adj 0.133 0.149 0.162
Axis 1 0.0051 83.01 29.46*** 0.0047 51.25 37.71*** 0.0104 58.02 23.36***
Axis 2 0.0007 11.79 4.18 0.0026 28.96 21.31*** 0.0031 17 6.85**
Cumulative 0.0058 94.8 0.0073 80.22 0.0135 75.03
AMT 0.0001 1.94 0.66 0.0012 13.51 9.91*** 0.0026 14.4 5.79***
TS 0.0001 1.91 0.65 0.0004 4.77 3.5** 0.0006 3.21 1.29
ATR 0.0004 7.04 2.40 0.0005 6.07 4.45** 0.001 5.67 2.28*
MTC 0.003 4.77 1.63 0.0003 3.71 2.71* 0.0005 2.89 1.17
AI 0.0005 8.78 3.00 0.0014 15.58 11.43*** 0.0031 17.04 6.86***
PET 0.001 15.63 5.34** 0.0008 8.56 6.28*** 0.0022 12.35 4.97***
AP 0.0000 0.49 0.17 0.0006 6.13 4.50*** 0.0008 4.61 1.86
PS 0.0011 17.82 6.09** 0.002 21.82 16.01*** 0.03 16.65 6.7***
PD 0.0026 41.59 14.21*** 0.0018 19.84 14.56*** 0.0042 23.16 9.33***
WATER ∩ TEMP 0.0035 10.23 0.0025 4.76 0.0048 5.53

Received: July 26, 2021; Accepted: October 27, 2021; Published: March 22, 2022

*Author for correspondance: kenoyama@enesmorelia.unam.mx

Associate editor: Monserrat Vázquez Sánchez

Author contributions: KO, VSA and ATM designed the study; VSA and ATM performed the fieldwork and laboratory analysis; VSA, ATM, CGA and KBHE conducted the statistical analyses; KO and ATM supervised the whole project; and KO, VSA, ATM, KBHE and CGA wrote the manuscript.

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License