SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.99 número4Comparación de conocimientos tradicionales sobre plantas comestibles entre jóvenes Tepehuanes del Sur de Durango, MéxicoEstudio morfoanatómico e histoquímico de semillas de cuatro especies de Swartzia (Fabaceae - Papilionoideae) en la Reserva de Desarrollo Sustentable de Tupé AM/Brasil índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Botanical Sciences

versión On-line ISSN 2007-4476versión impresa ISSN 2007-4298

Bot. sci vol.99 no.4 México oct./dic. 2021  Epub 18-Oct-2021

https://doi.org/10.17129/botsci.2842 

Physiology

Seasonal changes in photosynthesis for the epiphytic bromeliad Tillandsia brachycaulos in a tropical dry deciduous forest

Cambios estacionales en la fotosíntesis de la bromeliácea epifita Tillandsia brachycaulos en una selva baja caducifolia

Claudia González-Salvatierra1  2  3 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1667-4320

Luis Manuel Peña-Rodríguez1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6511-5122

Casandra Reyes-García1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9847-9053

Erick de la Barrera4 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0073-3410

Jose Luis Andrade1  * 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4991-5020

1 Centro de Investigación Científica de Yucatán, Mérida, Yucatán, México

2 Cátedra-CONACyT/TecNM/I.T. Chetumal, Chetumal, Quintana Roo. México

3Tecnológico Nacional de México/I.T. Chetumal. Chetumal, Quintana Roo. México

4 Instituto de Investigaciones en Ecosistemas y Sustentabilidad, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Morelia, Michoacán, México


Abstract

Background:

Sunlight stress and drought affect plants by inducing various biochemical and physiological responses, which reduce growth. Seasonal changes in light and water availability that occur in forest canopies, where epiphytes occur, are extreme.

Questions:

What are the seasonal changes in photosynthesis for an abundant epiphytic bromeliad in contrasting microenvironments? Is Crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM) an important feature of photoprotection for this epiphyte?

Studied species:

Tillandsia brachycaulos Schltdl. (Bromeliaceae)

Study site and dates:

Canopy of the tropical dry deciduous forest of Dzibilchaltún National Park, Yucatan, Mexico during the rainy season 2008 and dry season 2009.

Methods:

Diurnal measurements of photosystem II efficiency, titratable acidity, leaf water potential, and photosynthetic pigment concentration were measured during the dry and rainy seasons in adult plants of T. brachycaulos in shaded and exposed microenvironments. The prevailing environmental conditions (photon flux density, precipitation, air temperature and relative humidity) were also seasonally characterized.

Results:

The highest irradiance occurred during the dry season caused photo-inactivation, a decrease of the quantum efficiency of photosystem II and a reduction in CAM activity of about 40 % in leaves of exposed plants of T. brachycaulos. During the rainy season, the leaf water potential of exposed and shaded plants of T. brachycaulos was lower at midday than at predawn, indicating water loss during the day.

Conclusions:

Individuals of T. brachycaulos reduced CAM activity during the dry season; and, during the rainy season, increased carbon gain by stomata opening during phase II and IV of CAM.

Keywords: Chlorophyll fluorescence; crassulacean acid metabolism; microenvironments; photosynthetic pigments; water potentials

Resumen

Antecedentes:

El estrés por sequía y exceso de radiación afecta a las plantas a través de diferentes respuestas bioquímicas y fisiológicas, lo que reduce el crecimiento. Los cambios estacionales donde las epífitas habitan son extremos.

Preguntas:

¿Cuáles son los cambios estacionales en la fotosíntesis de una bromeliácea epifita en microambientes contrastantes? ¿Es el metabolismo ácido de las crasuláceas (CAM) importante para su fotoprotección?

Especie de estudio:

Tillandsia brachycaulos Schltdl. (Bromeliaceae)

Sitio de estudio y fechas:

Selva baja caducifolia del Parque Nacional Dzibilchaltún, Yucatán, México, durante la estación lluviosa (2008) y la estación seca (2009).

Métodos:

Mediciones diurnas de eficiencia del fotosistema II, acidez titulable, potencial hídrico foliar y pigmentos fotosintéticos fueron hechas en dos estaciones del año, en hojas de plantas de T. brachycaulos en dos microambientes. Se caracterizaron las condiciones ambientales (densidad de flujo de fotones, precipitación pluvial, temperatura del aire y humedad relativa).

Resultados:

La alta irradiación en la estación de sequía provocó fotoinactivación y disminución de la eficiencia en el fotosistema II, reduciendo en un 40 % de la actividad de CAM en las hojas de plantas expuestas de T. brachycaulos. Durante la estación lluviosa, el potencial hídrico foliar de plantas expuestas y sombreadas de T. brachycaulos fue menor al mediodía que a pre-alba, indicando una pérdida de agua durante el día.

Conclusiones:

Individuos de T. brachycaulos redujeron la actividad CAM durante la estación seca. Durante la estación lluviosa aumentaron la ganancia de carbono mediante la apertura de estomas en las fases II y IV de CAM.

Palabras clave: Metabolismo ácido de las crasuláceas; fluorescencia de la clorofila; microambientes; pigmentos fotosintéticos; potenciales hídricos

Tropical dry deciduous forests are characterized by seasonal drought and high photon flux densities (PFD), which are periodical hazards for many plant species. Moreover, environments in these dry forests are also characterized by high temperatures and elevated vapor pressure deficits (VPD) during the dry season, which in northern Yucatan can last up to three months (Orellana et al. 1999, Mendoza et al. 2007). When the dry season extends, photosystem reaction centers can be damaged, and alterations in the photophosphorylation and function of several enzymes involved in carbon fixation may also occur (Triantaphylidès & Havaux 2009, Fernández-Marín et al. 2020). In addition, Crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM) can be advantageous to cope with such desiccating conditions (Winter & Smith 1996, Ricalde et al. 2010, de la Rosa-Manzano et al. 2015), given that the diurnal fixation of CO2 by ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco) occurs under closed stomata. Such conditions generate high CO2 concentrations in the cytosol and chloroplasts, favoring Rubisco’s carboxylation activity over its oxygenase activity, providing additional photoprotection through maintenance of electron transport and preventing damage to photosystems (Niewiadomska & Borland 2008). Usually, excess photons are quickly dissipated as heat (Niyogi 2000, Yamori & Shikanai 2016), but photoinhibition occurs when the absorption of light energy exceeds the capacity for photosynthesis and the photoprotection mechanisms have been oversaturated (Takahashi & Murata 2008, Takahashi & Badger 2011, Nishiyama & Murata 2014, Adams et al. 2018).

Photoinhibition has been defined as a decrease in the photosynthetic efficiency that depends on the excess of light and leads to a partial loss of capacity to convert light into sugars and biomass allocation and, consequently, into growth (Long et al. 1994, Baker 2008, Blankenship 2014, Vialet-Chabrand et al. 2017). Because photoinhibition lowers productivity and plant growth, its avoidance is decisive for plant growth under variable environmental conditions (Long et al. 1994, Adams et al. 2008, Lawson et al. 2012, Evans 2013). Mechanisms of acclimation to cope with high sunlight can be particularly important for survival in the dry tropical forests of Yucatan, Mexico, where plants can receive up to nine times more PFD in the dry season, compared to the rainy season, and where the rain events during the dry season can be separated by more than 30 d (Graham & Andrade2004, González-Salvatierra et al. 2010).

Epiphytic species in the Bromeliaceae family show a wide range of strategies of light use, from those adapted to exposed sites, showing high light saturation points and low chlorophyll concentrations, to those adapted to the shade, with low values of light saturation and exhibiting photodegradation and photoinhibition when subjected to high light (Griffiths & Maxwell 1999, Benzing 2000, Hou-Sung & Niyogi 2008). These physiological adaptations are related to the forest type and to vertical gradients within the canopy (Smith et al. 1986, Griffiths & Maxwell 1999, Benzing 2000, Cach-Pérez et al. 2013, Cervantes et al. 2005, Keller & Lüttge 2005, Petter et al. 2016, Silvera & Lasso 2016).

Epiphytes have been postulated as species particularly vulnerable to prolonged droughts, given their strong coupling to the frequency of rain events, and their lack of access to water stored in the ground (Benzing 1998, de la Rosa-Manzano et al. 2014, Reyes-García & Griffiths 2009, Reyes-García et al. 2012, Zotz & Bader 2009). Moreover, epiphytic bromeliads show a low root to shoot ratio and the absorption of water and nutrients is primarily made by foliar trichomes (Benzing 2000, Zotz 2016); and, occasionally, they may rely on alternative sources of water other than rain, such as fog and dew, especially during part of the dry season (Andrade 2003, Guevara-Escobar et al. 2011, Reyes-García et al. 2012, Chávez-Sahagún et al. 2019). The aim of this study was to investigate the capacity for photosynthetic acclimation, under seasonal light micro-environment, for the CAM epiphytic bromeliad Tillandsia brachycaulos Schltdl., by measuring seasonal changes in chlorophyll fluorescence, nocturnal accumulation of tissue acidity, and water potentials, to characterize its responses to high light in the field. We expected that leaf tissues of T. brachycaulos would exhibit changes in photosynthetic parameters accordingly to the wide environmental changes that occur in its natural habitat, and these changes would be greater in the exposed microhabitats. This species grows in many forests within the Yucatan Peninsula with high density populations (Cach-Pérez et al. 2013). Furthermore, although T. brachycaulos shows lower morphological variation than other epiphytic bromeliads in the Yucatan Peninsula (Cach-Pérez et al. 2016), some studies reveal a high physiological plasticity in this species (Graham & Andrade 2004, Cervantes et al. 2005, González-Salvatierra et al. 2010, Cach-Pérez et al. 2018, Hernández-Robinson et al. 2020).

Materials and methods

Plant species and study site. Tillandsia brachycaulos Schltdl. is an atmospheric epiphyte found in tropical forests from southern Mexico through Central America to Venezuela (Ramírez et al. 2005). Within the Yucatan Peninsula, this species may be found in most types of forests, although it is most abundant in tropical dry deciduous forests (Olmsted & Gómez-Juárez 1996, Cach-Pérez et al. 2013). Tillandsia brachycaulos is an obligate CAM species (Graham & Andrade 2004).

The study was conducted at the Dzibilchaltún National Park (21° 05´ N, 89° 99´ W, 10 m asl), state of Yucatan, Mexico, whose vegetation is characterized as tropical dry deciduous forest with a maximum canopy height of 8 m (Thien et al. 1982, Mondragón et al. 2004, Valdez-Hernández et al. 2010). Mean annual precipitation is 700 mm and average annual temperature is 25.8 ºC (Orellana et al. 1999). The rainy season is between June and October and the dry season from March to May (Orellana et al. 1999), during which most of the trees are leafless (ca. 70 %; Mondragón et al. 2004, Valdez-Hernández et al. 2010).

Environment and micro-environment characterization. Environmental variables were measured using data collected with a meteorological station at the Dzibilchaltún National Park. Photon flux density (PFD) was measured with a quantum sensor (LI-190SB, Li-Cor, Inc., Lincoln, Nebraska), precipitation with a pluviometer (TR 525M, Texas Electronics, Inc., Dallas, Texas), and air temperature and relative humidity with a Vaisala shielded probe (HMP35C-L, Campbell Scientific, Logan, Utah). All variables were sampled at 15-s intervals and average values were recorded every 10 min with a datalogger (CR21X, Campbell Scientific).

The incident PFD was measured at 20 mm above the individual plants, with a quantum sensor (LI250-A, Li-Cor) in the rainy and dry seasons over three shaded and three exposed individuals; all individual epiphytes were between 1.8 - 2 m height, where the species is more abundant (Cach-Pérez et al. 2013). All measurements were taken every 3 h during the day on the first week of every month from August 2008 to May 2009. Both PFD above the canopy and on individual plants were integrated for each day during the season and an average was calculated.

Water potential and tissue acidity. Leaves of plants from both light microenvironments were collected during the dry and rainy seasons. To measure water potential (Ψ), leaf samples (n = 6 plants) were collected at predawn and at midday, stored at 4 ºC and transported to the laboratory (it took less than an hour from the field to the laboratory), where Ψ was measured using a chilled-mirror dewpoint meter (WP4, Decagon Devices, Inc. Washington). Samples were cut into square pieces, to cover the base of the sampling cups.

To characterize CAM, leaves from plants at both light micro-environments (n = 5 plants) were collected at dusk and before dawn the following day at each sampling season with a cork borer (1.54 cm2 leaf area). Plant material was cut and kept in a solution of 70% ethanol in 1.5-mL vials until laboratory analysis. The extraction was made by boiling, to remove the ethanol, macerating the plant material, and boiling in 10 mL of distilled water for 15 min; then 50 mL of distilled water was added, and the solution was titrated with 0.005 N NaOH to pH 7, using an electronic pH meter (Oakton® pH 510 series, Oakton Instruments Vernon Hills, Illinois, Zotz & Andrade 1998). Nocturnal acidification (ΔH+) was calculated from the hydrogen ion concentration (H+) at dawn minus the H+ at dusk.

Pigment concentration and fluorescence measurements. To determine chlorophyll and carotenoid concentrations, six leaf samples were collected from three exposed and three shaded individuals, during each sampling season, and transported at 4 °C to the laboratory. Pigments were quantified according to Hendry & Price (1993) for chlorophylls and to Wellburn (1994) for carotenoids. Extractions were performed from 50-mg samples (fresh weight) that were macerated with 2 mL of 80 % (v/v) cold acetone. The absorbance of the extracts obtained was measured with a spectrophotometer (DU650, Beckman Coulter, Indianapolis, Indiana) at 645 nm and 663 nm for chlorophyll and at 470 nm for total carotenoids.

A portable pulse-amplitude-modulated photosynthesis yield analyzer (Mini-PAM, H. Walz, Effeltrich, Germany) was used to evaluate chlorophyll a fluorescence, maximum quantum efficiency (Fv/Fm, variable fluorescence/maximum fluorescence), and related parameters (non-photochemical efficiency [NPQ], the quantum yield of photosystem II [ΦPSII], and the electron transport rate [ETR]). Measurements were carried out during the rainy and dry seasons on six individuals (three shaded and three exposed). Fv/Fm was assessed before dawn (05:00-06:00), while ETR, NPQ, ΦPSII and PFD were conducted every 3 h during a day.

Light response curves (LRC) of ETR were determined for both exposed and shaded plants to determine the light saturation point in both seasons (Rascher et al. 2000). Plants were acclimated to the dark by covering them with a black clothing for 20 min. Light saturation pulses were applied; first, the maximal yield in the absence of actinic light (Fv⁄Fm) was measured, and then a series of eight consecutive yield-measurements at increasing light intensities were started, until a maximum of approximately 1,400 μmol m-2 s-1 was reached. ETR was calculated as ΦPSII × PFD × 0.5 × 0.84, where the standard factor 0.84 corresponds to the fraction of incident light absorbed by the photosynthetic tissue (Ritchie & Bunthawin 2010). Such a factor has been recently validated for two bromeliad species, with a 5 % variation (Stemke & Santiago 2011). The light saturation point was calculated with a nonlinear curve fit.

Statistical analysis. Differences in environmental PFD and VPD between seasons were tested using a Student’s t-test. Differences in water potential, tissue acidity and pigment concentration between seasons, and light levels were tested using two-way ANOVAs. Differences in maximum diurnal fluorescence parameters were also tested with a two-way ANOVA. When significant differences occurred, a Tukey test was conducted. All tests were made with the STATISTICA statistical package version 7.0 (Statsoft, Dell, Round Rock, Texas). The light saturation point was calculated in OriginPro 8 SRO (V 8.0724, OriginLab Corporation 1991-2007) with a nonlinear curve fit, where datasets fit converged with an allometric model (equation y = axb).

Results

Environment and light micro-environments. During the dry season (April-May 2009), the mean daily photon flux density (PFD) above the canopy for clear days (47.1 ± 1.23 mol m-2 d-1) was not different than for clear days of the rainy season (August-September 2008; 45.8 ± 0.96 mol m-2 d-1; P > 0.05). The mean of the maximum vapor pressure deficit was 3.48 ± 0.139 kPa and 2.65 ± 0.111 kPa for the dry and rainy season, respectively; and it was significantly different between seasons (Figure 1, P < 0.005).

Figure 1 Monthly profile of daily photon flux density (PFD; line) above the canopy, maximum vapor pressure deficit (VPDmax; cross and line) and rainfall (bars) in Dzibilchaltún, Yucatan, Mexico, A. rainy (August-September 2008) and B. dry (April-May 2009) seasons. 

The percentage of daily PFD incident on shaded or exposed plants of T. brachycaulos during the rainy season was 5 and 70 %, respectively, increasing to 38 and 95 %, respectively, during the dry season (Table 1), when most trees shed their leaves in this forest. Incident PFD on individual plants was significantly different between seasons and between habitats (P < 0.05). The shaded individuals received an average of 13 mol m-2 d-1 more PFD in the dry season than in the rainy season.

Table 1 Daily incident photon flux density (PFD), total chlorophyll and carotenoids concentrations, maximum photochemical efficiency (Fv/Fm) for exposed and shaded plants of Tillandsia brachycaulos during the rainy and dry seasons in the tropical dry deciduous forest of Dzibilchaltún, Yucatan. Data are means ± S.E. (n = 21 for PFD, n = 3-5 for total chlorophyll and carotenoids concentrations and for Fv/Fm; fw = fresh weight). Different letters indicate significant differences between season and exposure (P < 0.05, Tukey`s test). 

Rainy season Dry season
Exposed Shaded Exposed Shaded
PFD
(mol m-2 d-1)
32.1b ± 4.82 2.3d ± 0.14 37.9a ± 2.04 15.3c ± 1.28
Total chlorophyll
(μg g-1 fw)
217.1bc ± 53.6 471.5a ± 77.7 116.7c ± 27.1 321.8ab ± 28.8
Carotenoids
(μg g-1 fw)
27.0c ± 3.6 31.3bc ± 2.8 55.3b ± 5 116.9a ± 13.3
Fv/Fm 0.70ab ± 0.06 0.80a ± 0.02 0.57c ± 0.02 0.67ab ± 0.05

Water potential and titratable acidity. Lower values (i.e., more negative) of predawn leaf water potential (Ψ) were observed for both, exposed and shaded plants of T. brachycaulos, during the dry season than during the rainy season (Figure 2, P < 0.013). During the rainy season, the values of predawn Ψ were significantly higher than at midday for both exposed and shaded plants (P < 0.05). Also, nocturnal acidification (ΔH+) in leaves was lower during the dry season than during the rainy season (P < 0.05), but no differences were found between exposed and shaded plants (Figure 3).

Figure 2 Predawn (gray bars) and midday (white bars) leaf water potentials (Ψ) of exposed and shaded plants during rainy and dry seasons, in the tropical dry deciduous forest of Dzibilchaltún, Yucatan, Mexico. Data are mean ± S.E. (n = 3-6). Different letters indicate significant differences between predawn and midday, and between seasons (P < 0.05, Tukey`s test). 

Figure 3 Tissue acidity (ΔH+; hydrogen ion concentration (H +) at dawn minus H+ at dusk) of Tillandsia brachycaulos for exposed (white bars) and shaded (gray bars) plants, during dry and rainy seasons, in the tropical dry deciduous forest of Dzibilchaltún, Yucatan, Mexico. Data are mean ± S.E. (n = 5). Different letters indicate significant differences between exposed and shaded plants (P < 0.05, Tukey`s test). 

Pigment concentration and fluorescence parameters. A higher chlorophyll concentration was found for shaded plants compared with exposed plants, and the lowest values were observed for exposed plants during the dry season (Table 1, P < 0.05). Carotenoid concentration was different between seasons (P < 0.05) and between light microenvironments (P < 0.05). Shaded plants showed about 3.5 times greater carotenoids concentration during the dry season than during the rainy season, while exposed plants also showed a smaller, but significant increase during the dry season.

During the dry season, maximum quantum efficiency (Fv/Fm) values decreased in both shaded and exposed plants compared to the Fv/Fm values of the rainy season (Table 1, P < 0.05). The lowest mean Fv/Fm value (0.57) was recorded in leaves of exposed plants during the dry season, and the highest value (0.80) was found in leaves of shaded plants during the rainy season.

Quantum yield of photosystem II (ΦPSII) values showed significant differences between shaded and exposed plants (P < 0.001) and between seasons (Figure 4A and F; P < 0.003). During the dry season, ΦPSII values declined to very low levels upon exposure to high PFD and non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) was consistently low during the rainy and dry seasons in shaded plants. Particularly, during the rainy season, exposed plants showed that NPQ increased markedly early in the morning, declining to low levels for the rest of the day (Figure 4G and H). Electron transport rate (ETR) values were high during the dry season (Figure 4I and J), increasing at midday and ΦPSII values decreased (Figure 4E-F) with increasing PFD, with low NPQ values in both exposed and shaded plants (Figure 4G-H).

Figure. 4 A, B. Daily course of instantaneous photon flux density (PFD) and C, D. temperature in exposed (open squares) and shaded (closed squares) plants of the epiphytic bromeliad Tillandsia brachycaulos, and daily course measurements of chlorophyll fluorescence parameters: E, F. photochemical efficiency of PSII (ΦPSII), G, H. non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) and I, J. electron transport rate (ETR) during the rainy (left panels) and dry (right panels) seasons in the dry deciduous forest of Dzibilchaltún, Mexico. Values are mean ± S.E. (n = 3). Different letters indicate significant differences between seasons and microenvironments (P < 0.05, Tukey`s test). 

The light saturation point was significantly different between seasons (P < 0.05), but no differences were observed between the leaves of exposed and shaded plants (Figure 5); during the rainy season, the light saturation point for leaves of both exposed and shaded plants was 800 μmol m-2 s-1 of PFD (Figure 5Aa); however, during the dry season, the maximum light saturation point decreased to less than 465 μmol m-2 s-1 (Figure 5Bb).

Figure 5 Light response curves (LRC) of photosynthetic electron transport rate (ETR) for exposed and shaded plants of Tillandsia brachycaulos. The curve shows the LRC of exposed (white circles) and shaded (black circles) plants during rainy A and dry B seasons. Values are mean ± S.E. (n = 3). Dashed line corresponds to the light saturation point calculated with a nonlinear curve fit. 

Discussion

The leaf tissues of the epiphyte Tillandsia brachycaulos showed unusual water relations during the rainy season; a high daily oscillation in leaves water potential (Ψ) and low midday Ψ values were observed (Figure 2). It has been established that the nocturnal accumulation of malic acid in CAM plants decreases the leaf Ψ in the morning (as it decreases osmotic potential) and increases it during the day because malate decarboxylation occurs under closed stomata (Smith et al. 1986, Males & Griffiths 2017, Pereira & Cushman 2019). During the dry season, Ψ values were not significantly different between predawn and midday, but the predawn Ψ values were lower than during the rainy season. Although during the dry season acid accumulation is low, reduction of osmotic potentials would be by production of other organic solutes rather than malic acid. Actually, this decrease in osmotic potentials occurs during the early dry season in preparation for the extreme dry season where osmotic potentials are the lowest (Hernández-Robinson et al. 2020). Furthermore, during the rainy season leaf temperature for individuals of this species is lower than that of the air, indicating stomatal opening during the day (Andrade 2003, Hernández-Robinson et al. 2020). In fact, well-watered T. brachycaulos plants fix as much as 20 % of their total CO2 via rubisco mainly during phase IV of CAM (Graham & Andrade 2004).

Nocturnal changes in tissue acidity during the dry season were small for leaves of T. brachycaulos compared to the rainy season, regardless of light exposure. This also occurs for terrestrial CAM plants from shaded microhabitats in tropical deciduous forests since they show a greater nocturnal accumulation of tissue acidity when growing in exposed sites, owing to their massive leaves and stems (Nobel 2003, Ricalde et al. 2010). Moreover, the observed reduction of tissue acidity during the dry season is more likely to occur because of higher nocturnal temperatures than during the rainy season (Nobel et al. 1991, Cervera et al. 2007, Andrade et al. 2009). Additionally, increased light incidence without a proportional increase in the malate supply would predispose this epiphytic species to photoinhibition, which, along with drought stress, would increase the negative effects of the high radiation (Skillman & Winter 1997, van Tongerlo et al. 2021). In fact, studies show that stress caused by drought or extreme temperatures increases the risk and severity of photoinhibition in plants in arid regions and in tropical epiphytes (Athar & Ashraf 2005, Hasanuzzaman et al. 2013, Chaves et al. 2018, Arroyo-Pérez et al. 2017).

The chlorophyll content confirmed that the leaves of T. brachycaulos possess several characteristics typical of exposed and shaded-adapted plants depending on the microhabitat where these were sampled (Givnish 1988, Martin et al. 1999, Lambers & Oliveira 2019.), with a higher total chlorophyll concentration in leaves of shaded plants compared to leaves of exposed individuals, indicating modifications to the light harvesting apparatus, e.g., reduction in the number of photosynthetic reaction centers in exposed plants. Total chlorophyll values observed here were similar and comparable to those found for other epiphytic and terrestrial bromeliads (Griffiths & Maxwell 1999, Martin et al. 1999, Benzing 2000, Graham & Andrade 2004, Matsubara et al. 2009). During the dry season, leaf tissues of both exposed and shaded plants had reduced chlorophyll and increased carotenoid contents, a pigment combination that prevents excessive light absorption. Similarly, the leaves of some bromeliads and orchids growing under high-light conditions show an increase in carotenoid concentration, particularly zeaxanthin, which reduces oxidative damage by light saturation (Königer et al. 1995, Skillman & Winter 1997, Matsubara et al. 2009, de la Rosa-Manzano et al. 2015).

A previous study shows that leaves of exposed individuals of T. brachycaulos have an anthocyanin concentration that is four-fold higher than that of the sympatric terrestrial Bromelia karatas (González-Salvatierra et al. 2010). Additional mechanisms of photoprotection were found in the present study, such as low chlorophyll and high carotenoid concentrations during the dry season, together with a high NPQ. The low values of Fv/Fm observed during the dry season can represent a photo-inactivation or even photo-damage of PSII (Maxwell et al. 1992, Zotz & Winter 1994, Chow et al. 2005, Ritchie & Bunthawin 2010). This photo-inactivation rapidly reverses as the rainy season progresses and promotes survival of the species in its natural habitat (Xiong et al. 2000). Consequently, the drought stress observed, during the dry season, for T. brachycaulos plants was significant to assume that more prolonged droughts and lower frequency of rain events could be potentially dangerous for the epiphytic bromeliad populations, although Tillandsia species are highly plastic (Cach-Pérez et al. 2018, Rosado-Calderón et al. 2020).

During the rainy season, leaves of exposed plants of T. brachycaulos dissipated excess energy as heat, decreasing the likelihood of photoinhibition, as suggested by the high ΦPSII values measured in the early morning, producing photochemical and non-photochemical dissipation, and avoiding permanent damage to the photosynthetic apparatus (Demmig‐Adams & Adams 2006). The down-regulation of ΦPSII should mean an increase of NPQ (Nogués & Baker 2000). However, NPQ values in leaves of shaded plants during both seasons remained consistently low and did not show diurnal differences. During the dry season, an increase of ETR for both shaded and exposed plants, associated with increased light incidence, resulted in a ΦPSII inactivation process and, therefore, NPQ and ΦPSII remained low during the day, decreasing oxidative damage (Adams et al. 2013). Thus, the NPQ value refers to the mechanism used by plants to dissipate excess heat energy when subjected to high levels of environmental stress and is, therefore, a mechanism to avoid photoinhibition (Maxwell & Johnson 2000, Chow et al. 2005).

In conclusion, the epiphytic bromeliad Tillandsia brachycaulos, showed fast photoprotection responses and specialized physiological and morphological strategies related to their light tolerance and their ability to endure the dry season in this forest. Yet, despite presenting adaptations common to other epiphytic bromeliads to cope with drought and the large seasonal changes in light (Maxwell et al. 1992, 1994), this species has a reduced growth and reproduction in certain microhabitats, mainly due to leaf temperatures that are 2-5 ºC higher than the air during the afternoon and an apparently reduced water accessibility (Cervantes et al. 2005). Furthermore, in those hot microhabitats T. brachycaulos plants increase their leaf relative capacitance to cope with those extreme changes (Hernández-Robinson et al. 2020). More detailed common garden and laboratory experiments, as well as long-term field observations of populations of this and other epiphytic bromeliads, are necessary to understand and even predict potential changes in their populations in response to changes in the environment in tropical dry deciduous forests of Yucatan.

Acknowledgements

We thank to Gabriel Dzib for field assistance, to Roberth Us-Santamaría and Luis Simá for help with the meteorological data and to the authorities of the Dzibilchaltún National Park for support and access to the park's facilities. We also appreciate the help of Ted Killas for English editing. This research was partially supported by the grant Fondo Sectorial Ciencia Básica, Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (Conacyt), Mexico (48344/24588 to JLA) and by Fondo Mixto Yucatán (66262 to LMPR). C. González-Salvatierra was recipient of a Ph.D. fellowship by Conacyt (172810).

Literature cited

Adams WW, Zarter CR, Muehv KE, Amiard V, Demmig-Adams B. 2008. Energy dissipation and photoinhibition: a continuum of photoprotection. In: Demmig-Adams B, Adams WW, Mattoo AK, eds. Photoprotection, photoinhibition, gene regulation and environment. Netherlands: Springer Science Business Media BV, , pp. 49-64. ISBN: 978-1-4020-3579-1 [ Links ]

Adams WW III, Muller O, Cohu CM, Demmig-Adams B. 2013. May photoinhibition be a consequence, rather than a cause, of limited plant productivity? Photosynthesis Research 117:31-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11120-013-9849-7 [ Links ]

Adams WW, Stewart JJ, Demmig-Adams B. 2018. Photosynthetic modulation in response to plant activity and environment. In: Adams III W, Terashima I, eds. The Leaf: A platform for performing photosynthesis. Advances in photosynthesis and respiration (Including bioenergy and related processes), Vol 44. Switzerland AG: Springer International Publishing, Cham. pp. 493-566. ISBN 978-3-319-93592-8, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93594-2_18 [ Links ]

Andrade JL. 2003. Dew deposition on epiphytic bromeliad leaves: an important event in a Mexican tropical dry deciduous forest. Journal of Tropical Ecology 19: 479-88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266467403003535 [ Links ]

Andrade JL, Cervera JC, Graham EA. 2009. Microenvironments, water relations, and productivity of CAM plants. In: de la Barrera E, Smith WK, eds. Perspectives in biophysical plant ecophysiology. A tribute to Park S. Nobel. Mexico, DF: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. pp. 95-120. ISBN: 978-0-578-00676-5 [ Links ]

Athar HUR, Ashraf M. 2005. Photosynthesis under drought stress. In: Pessarakli M, ed. Hand Book of Photosynthesis. New York: CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group, pp. 793-809. ISBN-13: 978-0824758394 [ Links ]

Arroyo-Pérez E, Flores J, González-Salvatierra C, Matías-Palafox ML, Jiménez-Sierra C. 2017. High tolerance to high-light conditions for the protected species Ariocarpus kotschoubeyanus (Cactaceae). Conservation Physiology 5: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/conphys/cox042 [ Links ]

Baker NR. 2008. Chlorophyll fluorescence: A probe of photosynthesis in vivo. Annual Review of Plant Biology 59: 89-113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092759 [ Links ]

Benzing DH. 1998. Vulnerabilities of tropical forests to climate change: the significance of resident epiphytes. Climatic Change 39: 519-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005312307709 [ Links ]

Benzing DH. 2000. Bromeliaceae: profile of an adaptive radiation. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 0-521-43031-3 [ Links ]

Blankenship R. 2014. Molecular mechanisms of photosynthesis. London: Blackwell Science. ISBN: 978-1-4051-8976-7 [ Links ]

Cach-Pérez MJ, Andrade JL, Chilpa-Galván N, Tamayo Chim M, Orellana R, Reyes-García C. 2013. Climatic and structural factors influencing epiphytic bromeliad community assemblage along a gradient of water-limited environments in the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico. Tropical Conservation Science 6: 283-302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/194008291300600209 [ Links ]

Cach-Pérez MJ, Andrade JL, Cetzal-Ix W, Reyes-García C. 2016. Environmental influence on the inter-and intraspecific variation in the density and morphology of stomata and trichomes of epiphytic bromeliads of the Yucatan Peninsula.Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society181: 441-458. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/boj.12398 [ Links ]

Cach-Pérez MJ, Andrade JL, Reyes-García C. 2018. Morphophysiological plasticity in epiphytic bromeliads across a precipitation gradient in the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico.Tropical Conservation Science11: 1940082918781926. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1940082918781926 [ Links ]

Cervantes SE, Graham EA, Andrade JL. 2005. Light microhabitats, growth and photosynthesis of an epiphytic bromeliad in a tropical dry forest. Plant Ecology 179: 107-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-004-5802-3 [ Links ]

Cervera JC, Andrade JL, Graham EA, Durán R, Jackson PC, Simá JL. 2007. Photosynthesis and optimal light microhabitats for a rare cactus, Mammillaria gaumeri, in two tropical ecosystems. Biotropica 39: 620-627. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2007.00311.x [ Links ]

Chaves CJN, Leal BSS, Lemos-Filho JP. 2018. How are endemic and widely distributed bromeliads responding to warming temperatures? A case study in a Brazilian hotspot. Flora 238: 110-118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2017.05.003 [ Links ]

Chávez-Sahagún E, Andrade JL, Zotz G, Reyes-García C. 2019. Dew can prolong photosynthesis and water status during drought in some epiphytic bromeliads from a seasonally dry tropical forest.Tropical Conservation Science 12: 1-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1940082919870054 [ Links ]

Chow WS, Lee HY, He J, Hendrickson L, Hong Y-N, Matsubara S. 2005. Photoinactivation of photosystem II in leaves. Photosynthesis Research 84: 35-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11120-005-0410-1 [ Links ]

de la Rosa-Manzano E, Andrade JL, García-Mendoza E, Zotz G, Reyes-García C. 2015. Photoprotection related to xanthophyll cycle pigments in epiphytic orchids acclimated at different light microenvironments in two tropical dry forests of the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico.Planta242: 1425-1438. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-015-2383-4 [ Links ]

de la Rosa-Manzano E, Andrade JL, Zotz G, Reyes-García C. 2014. Epiphytic orchids in tropical dry forest of Yucatan, Mexico - Species occurrence abundance and correlations with host tree characteristics and environmental conditions. Flora 209: 100-109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2013.12.002 [ Links ]

Demmig‐Adams B, Adams WW. 2006. Photoprotection in an ecological context: the remarkable complexity of thermal energy dissipation. New Phytologist 172: 11-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01835.x [ Links ]

Evans J. 2013. Improving photosynthesis. Plant Physiology 162: 1780-1793. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.113.219006 [ Links ]

Fernández-Marín B, Gulías J, Figueroa CM, Iñiguez C, Clemente-Moreno MJ, Nunes-Nesi A, Fernie AR, Cavieres LA, Bravo LA, García-Plazola JI, Gago J. 2020. How do vascular plants perform photosynthesis in extreme environments? An integrative ecophysiological and biochemical story. The Plant Journal 101: 979-1000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.14694 [ Links ]

Givnish TJ. 1988. Adaptation to sun and shade: a whole-plant perspective. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 15: 63-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/PP9880063 [ Links ]

González-Salvatierra C, Andrade JL, Escalante-Erosa F, García-Sosa K, Peña-Rodríguez LM. 2010. Antioxidant content in two CAM bromeliad species as a response to seasonal light changes in a tropical dry deciduous forest. Journal of Plant Physiology 167: 792-99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2010.01.001 [ Links ]

Graham EA, Andrade JL. 2004. Drought tolerance associated with vertical stratification of two co-occurring epiphytic bromeliads in a tropical dry forest. American Journal of Botany 91: 699-706. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.91.5.699 [ Links ]

Griffiths H, Maxwell K. 1999. In memory of C. S. Pittendrigh: does exposure in forest canopy relate to photoprotective strategies in epiphytic bromeliads? Functional Ecology 13: 15-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2435.1999.00291.x [ Links ]

Guevara-Escobar A, Cervantes-Jiménez M, Suzán-Azpiri H, González-Sosa E, Hernández-Sandoval L, Malda-Barrera G, Martínez-Díaz M. 2011. Fog interception by ball moss (Tillandsia recurvata). Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 15: 2509-2518. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-2509-2011 [ Links ]

Hasanuzzaman M, Nahar K, Alam MM, Roychowdhury R, Fujita M. 2013. Physiological, biochemical, and molecular mechanisms of heat stress tolerance in plants. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 14: 9643-9684. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms14059643 [ Links ]

Hendry GA, Price AH. 1993. Stress indicators: chlorophylls and carotenoids. In: Hendry GAF, Grime JP, eds. Methods in Comparative Plant Ecology. London: Chapman and Hall, pp. 148-152. ISBN: 978-94-011-1494-3 [ Links ]

Hernández-Robinson S, Graham EA, Hernández-González O, Us-Santamaría R, Simá JL, Arellano-Martín F, Andrade JL. 2020. Hot but Not Dry: modest changes in water relations for an epiphytic bromeliad in a tropical dry deciduous forest.International Journal of Plant Sciences181: 945-954. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/710487 [ Links ]

Hou-Sung J, Niyogi K. 2008. Molecular analysis of photoprotection of photosynthesis. In: Demmig-Adams B, Adams W, Mattoo A. Photoprotection, Photoinhibition, Gene Regulation, and Environment. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, pp. 127-143 ISBN: 978-1-4020-9281-7 [ Links ]

Keller P, Lüttge U. 2005. Photosynthetic light-use by three bromeliads originating from shaded sites (Ananas ananassoides, Ananas comosus cv. Panare) and exposed sites (Pitcairnia pruinosa) in the medium Orinoco basin, Venezuela. Biologia Plantarum 49: 73-79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10535-005-3079-6 [ Links ]

Königer M, Harris GC, Virgo A, Winter K. 1995. Xanthophyll-cycle pigments and photosynthetic capacity in tropical forest species: a comparative field study on canopy, gap and understory plants. Oecologia 104: 280-290. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00328362 [ Links ]

Lambers H, Oliveira RS. 2019. Photosynthesis, Respiration, and Long-Distance Transport: Photosynthesis. In: Lambers H, Oliveira RS, eds. Plant Physiological Ecology. Switzerland: Springer, Cham. pp. 11-114. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29639-1_2 [ Links ]

Lawson T, Kramer DM, Raines CA. 2012. Improving yield by exploiting mechanisms underlying natural variation of photosynthesis. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 23: 215-220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2011.12.012 [ Links ]

Long SP, Humphries S, Falkowski PG. 1994. Photoinhibition of photosynthesis in nature. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 45: 633-62. DOI https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pp.45.060194.003221 [ Links ]

Males J, Griffiths H. 2017. Stomatal biology of CAM plants. Plant Physiology 174: 550-560. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.17.00114 [ Links ]

Martin CE, Tüffers A, Herppich WB, von Willert DJ. 1999. Utilization and dissipation of absorbed light energy in the epiphytic crassulacean acid metabolism bromeliad Tillandsia ionantha. International Journal of Plant Sciences 160: 307-313. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/314130 [ Links ]

Matsubara S, Krause GH, Aranda J, Virgo A, Beisel KG, Jahns P, Winter K. 2009. Sun-shade patterns of leaf carotenoid composition in 86 species of neotropical forest plants. Functional Plant Biology 36: 20-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/FP08214 [ Links ]

Maxwell C, Griffiths H, Borland AM, Broadmeadow MSJ, McDavid CR. 1992. Photoinhibitory responses of the epiphytic bromeliad Guzmania monostachia during the dry season in Trinidad maintains photochemical integrity under adverse conditions. Plant Cell and Environment 15: 37-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.1992.tb01456.x [ Links ]

Maxwell C, Griffiths H, Young AJ. 1994. Photosynthetic acclimation to light regime and water stress by the C3-CAM epiphyte Guzmania monostachia: gas-exchange characteristics, photochemical efficiency and the xanthophyll cycle. Functional Ecology 8: 746-754. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2390234 [ Links ]

Maxwell K, Johnson GN. 2000. Chlorophyll fluorescence-a practical guide. Journal of Experimental Botany 51: 659-668. https://doi.org/10.1093/jexbot/51.345.659 [ Links ]

Mendoza B, García-Acosta V, Velasco V, Jáuregui E, Díaz-Sandoval R. 2007. Frequency and duration of historical droughts from the 16th to the 19th centuries in the Mexican Maya lands, Yucatan Peninsula. Climatic Change 83: 151-168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9232-1 [ Links ]

Mondragón D, Durán R, Ramírez I, Valverde T. 2004. Temporal variation in the demography of the clonal epiphyte Tillandsia brachycaulos (Bromeliaceae) in the Yucatán Península, Mexico. Journal of Tropical Ecology 20: 189-200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266467403001287 [ Links ]

Niewiadomska E, Borland AM. 2008. Crassulacean acid metabolism: a cause or consequence of oxidative stress in plants? In: Lüttge U, Beyschlag W, Murata J, eds. Progress in Botany 69. Berlin: Springer Germany, pp. 247-66. ISBN: 978-3-540-72954-9 [ Links ]

Nishiyama Y, Murata N. 2014. Revised scheme for the mechanism of photoinhibition and its application to enhance the abiotic stress tolerance of the photosynthetic machinery. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 98: 8777-8796. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-014-6020-0 [ Links ]

Niyogi KK. 2000. Safety valves for photosynthesis. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 3: 455-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s1369-5266(00)00113-8 [ Links ]

Nobel PS. 2003.Environmental Biology of Agaves and Cacti. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 9780521543347 [ Links ]

Nobel PS, Loik ME, Meyer RW. 1991. Microhabitat and diel tissue acidity changes for two sympatric cactus species differing in growth habitat. Journal of Ecology 79: 167-182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2260791 [ Links ]

Nogués S, Baker NR. 2000. Effects of drought on photosynthesis in Mediterranean plants grown under enhanced UV-B radiation. Journal of Experimental Botany 51: 1309-1317. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/51.348.1309 [ Links ]

Olmsted I, Gómez-Juárez M. 1996. Distribution and conservation of epiphytes in the Yucatan Peninsula. Selbyana 17: 58-70. [ Links ]

Orellana LR, Balam KM, Bañuelos RI, García ME, González-Iturbe AJ, Herrera CF, Vidal LJ. 1999. Evaluación climática. In: García A, Córdoba J, eds. Atlas de procesos territoriales de Yucatán. Mérida, Yucatán: Facultad de Arquitectura, Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán, pp. 163-82. [ Links ]

Petter G, Wagner K, Wanek W, Sánchez-Delgado EJ, Zotz G, Cabral JS, Kreft H. 2016. Functional leaf traits of vascular epiphytes: Vertical trends within the forest, intra and interspecific trait variability, and taxonomic signals. Functional Ecology 30: 188-198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12490 [ Links ]

Pereira PN, Cushman JC. 2019. Exploring the relationship between crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM) and mineral nutrition with a special focus on nitrogen. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 20: 4363. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20184363 [ Links ]

Ramírez I, Carnevali G, Chi F. 2005. Guía Ilustrada de las Bromeliaceae de la porción mexicana de la península de Yucatán. Mérida, Yucatán: Centro de Investigación Científica de Yucatán., México. ISBN: 968-6532-14-5 [ Links ]

Rascher U, Liebig M, Lüttge U. 2000. Evaluation of instant light-response curves of chlorophyll fluorescence parameters obtained with a portable chlorophyll fluorometer on site in the field. Plant Cell and Environment 23: 1397-405. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3040.2000.00650.x [ Links ]

Reyes-García C, Griffiths H. 2009. Ecophysiological studies of perennials of the Bromeliaceae family in a dry forest: strategies for survival. In: de la Barrera E, Smith WK, eds. Perspectives in Biophysical Plant Ecophysiology: A Tribute to Park S. Nobel. Mexico, DF: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. pp. 121-151. ISBN: 978-0-578-00676-5 [ Links ]

Reyes-García C, Mejía-Chang M, Griffiths H. 2012. High but not dry: diverse epiphytic bromeliad adaptations to exposure within a seasonally dry tropical forest community. New Phytologist 193: 745-754. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03946.x [ Links ]

Ricalde MF, Andrade JL, Durán R, Dupuy JM, Simá JL, Us-Santamaría R, Santiago LS. 2010. Environmental regulation of carbon isotope composition and crassulacean acid metabolism in three plant communities along a water availability gradient.Oecologia164: 871-880. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-010-1724-z [ Links ]

Ritchie RJ, Bunthawin S. 2010. The use of pulse amplitude modulation (PAM) fluorometry to measure photosynthesis in a CAM orchid, Dendrobium spp. (D. cv. Viravuth Pink). International Journal of Plant Sciences 171: 575-585. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/653131 [ Links ]

Rosado‐Calderón AT, Tamayo‐Chim M, de la Barrera E, Ramírez‐Morillo IM, Andrade JL, Briones O, Reyes‐García C. 2020. High resilience to extreme climatic changes in the CAM epiphyte Tillandsia utriculata L. (Bromeliaceae). Physiologia Plantarum168: 547-562. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.12805 [ Links ]

Silvera K, Lasso E. 2016. Ecophysiology and crassulacean acid metabolism of tropical epiphytes. In: Goldstein G, Santiago LS, eds. Tropical Tree Physiology: Adaptations and Responses in a Changing Environment. New York: Springer, 25-43. ISBN: 978-3-319-27422-5 [ Links ]

Skillman JB, Winter K. 1997. High photosynthetic capacity in a shade-tolerant crassulacean acid metabolism plant. Plant Physiology 113: 441-450. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.113.2.441 [ Links ]

Smith JAC, Griffiths H, Lüttge U. 1986. Comparative ecophysiology of CAM and C3 bromeliads. I. The ecology of the Bromeliaceae in Trinidad. Plant Cell and Environment 9: 359-376. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.1986.tb01750.x [ Links ]

Stemke J, Santiago L. 2011. Consequences of light absorptance in calculating electron transport rate of desert and succulent plants. Photosynthetica 49: 195-200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11099-011-0026-y [ Links ]

Takahashi S, Murata N. 2008. How do environmental stresses accelerate photoinhibition? Trends in Plant Science 13: 178-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2008.01.005 [ Links ]

Takahashi S, Badger MR. 2011. Photoprotection in plants: a new light on photosystem II damage. Trends in Plant Science 16: 53-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2010.10.001 [ Links ]

Thien LB, Bradburn AS, Welden AL. 1982. The woody vegetation of Dzibilchaltun. A maya archeological site in Northwest Yucatán, Mexico. Middle American Research Institute Occasional Papers 5: 1-24. [ Links ]

Triantaphylidès C, Havaux M. 2009. Singlet oxygen in plants: production, detoxification and signaling. Trends in Plant Science 14: 219-228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2009.01.008 [ Links ]

Valdez-Hernández M, Andrade JL, Jackson PC, Rebolledo-Vieyra M. 2010. Phenology of five tree species of a tropical dry forest in Yucatán, Mexico: effects of environmental and physiological factors. Plant Soil 329: 155-171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-009-0142-7 [ Links ]

Vialet-Chabrand S, Matthews JS, Simkin AJ, Raines CA, Lawson T. 2017. Importance of fluctuations in light on plant photosynthetic acclimation. Plant Physiology 173: 2163-2179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.16.01767 [ Links ]

van Tongerlo E, Trouwborst G, Hogewoning SW, van Ieperen W, Dieleman JA, Marcelis LFM. 2021. Crassulacean acid metabolism species differ in the contribution of C3 and C4 carboxylation to end of day CO2 fixation. Physiologia Plantarum 172: 134-145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.13312 [ Links ]

Wellburn AR. 1994. The spectral determination of chlorophylls a and b, as well as total carotenoids, using various solvents with spectrophotometers of different resolution. Journal of Plant Physiology 144: 307-313. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0176-1617(11)81192-2 [ Links ]

Winter K, Smith JAC. 1996. An introduction to crassulacean acid metabolism. Biochemical principles and ecological diversity. In: Winter K, Smith JAC, eds. Crassulacean acid metabolism. Berlin: Springer Germany, pp. 1-13. ISBN: 978-3-642-79060-7 [ Links ]

Xiong FS, Mueller EC, Day TA. 2000. Photosynthetic and respiratory acclimation and growth response of Antarctic vascular plants to contrasting temperature regimes. American Journal of Botany 87: 700-710. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2656856 [ Links ]

Yamori W, Shikanai T. 2016. Physiological functions of cyclic electron transport around photosystem I in sustaining photosynthesis and plant growth. Annual Review of Plant Biology 67: 81-106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-043015-112002 [ Links ]

Zotz G. 2016. Plants on Plants - The Biology of Vascular Epiphytes. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. 282 pp ISBN: 978-3-319-39237-0 [ Links ]

Zotz G, Winter K. 1994. Annual carbon balance and nitrogen use efficiency in tropical C3 and CAM epiphytes. New Phytologist 126: 481-492. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1994.tb04245.x [ Links ]

Zotz G, Andrade JL. 1998. Water relations of two co-occurring epiphytic bromeliads. Journal of Plant Physiology 152: 545-554. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0176-1617(98)80276-9 [ Links ]

Zotz G, Bader MY. 2009. Epiphytic plants in a changing world-global: change effects on vascular and nonvascular epiphytes. In: Lüttge U, Beyschlag W, Büdel B, Francis D, eds. Progress in Botany 70. Berlin: Springer Germany, pp. 147-170. ISBN: 0340-4773 [ Links ]

Received: January 24, 2021; Accepted: March 23, 2021; Published: August 13, 2021

*Corresponding author: andrade@cicy.mx

Associate editor: Wilmer Tezara

Author contributions: CGS, conceptualization, field and laboratory work, data analysis, writing - original draft; LMPR, conceptualization, data analysis, supervision, writing - review and editing; CRG data analysis, writing - review and editing; EDB data analysis, writing - review and editing ; JLA, conceptualization, data analysis, supervision, writing - original draft.

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License