SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.97 número4Localización de las especies en el espacio de estrategias de Grime: una alternativa a los métodos basados en atributosRelaciones de la biodiversidad en tres componentes estructurales de un bosque de hayas de Fagus grandifolia subsp. mexicana índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Botanical Sciences

versión On-line ISSN 2007-4476versión impresa ISSN 2007-4298

Bot. sci vol.97 no.4 México oct./dic. 2019  Epub 04-Feb-2020

https://doi.org/10.17129/botsci.2221 

Ecología

Exploring plant root-fungal interactions in a neotropical freshwater wetland

Explorando interacciones raíz-hongo en un humedal neotropical de agua dulce

Jazmín Santillán-Manjarrez1 

A. Penélope Solís-Hernández2 

Patricia Castilla-Hernández2 

Ignacio E. Maldonado-Mendoza3 

Gilberto Vela-Correa2 

Aurora Chimal-Hernández2 

Claudia Hernández-Díaz2 

Martha Signoret-Poillon2 

Diederik van Tuinen4 

Facundo Rivera-Becerril2  * 

1 Maestría en Ciencias Agropecuarias, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Xochimilco, Mexico City, Mexico.

2 Departamento El Hombre y su Ambiente, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Xochimilco, Mexico City, Mexico.

3 Departamento de Biotecnología Agrícola, CIIDIR-Unidad Sinaloa, IPN, Guasave Sin., Mexico.

4 UMR1347 Agroécologie, AgroSup Dijon, CNRS, INRA, Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Dijon, France.


Abstract:

Background:

Wetlands in Neotropics harbor high fungal diversity, including arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and dark septate endophytes (DSE). This study describes the interaction of plant roots with AMF and DSE in a freshwater wetland belonging to a hotspot of biodiversity.

Hypothesis:

Differential root colonization between arbuscular mycorrhizal and dark septate endophyte fungi is influenced by plant species and abiotic conditions in a freshwater wetland.

Studied species:

Plant species colonized by arbuscular mycorrhizal and dark septate endophyte fungi.

Methods:

Properties of soils and the water column, floristic composition, root colonization by AMF and DSE, and molecular identification of AMF inside roots were studied.

Results:

Soils were Gleysol and flooded during the rainy season. Most of identified plant species were herbaceous, with Cyperus articulatus and Mimosa pigra as the dominant species. Seven of 8 analyzed plant species exhibited differential co-colonization between AMF and DSE. Repeated sampling for one year under flooding/dry conditions demonstrated that C. articulatus and M. pigra were mainly associated with DSE and AMF, respectively. A positive correlation between dissolved O2 in the water column and fungal colonization was observed in C. articulatus. Glomerales and Archaeosporales were molecularly identified inside roots containing arbuscules of M. pigra.

Conclusions:

Findings highlight differential coexistence between AMF and DSE in plant roots; fungal colonization was influenced by flooding/dry conditions in a neotropical wetland; the community of AMF inside arbusculated roots of M. pigra includes at least four clades.

Keywords: Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi; Cyperus articulatus; dark septate endophyte fungi; gleysol; Mimosa pigra; Neotropics

Resumen:

Antecedentes:

Los humedales del neotrópico albergan una alta diversidad fúngica, incluyendo hongos micorrízico arbusculares (HMA) y hongos endófitos septados oscuros (ESO). Se describe la interacción vegetal con HMA y ESO en un humedal de agua dulce.

Hipótesis:

La colonización radical diferencial entre HMA y ESO es influenciada por la especie vegetal y por las condiciones abióticas en un humedal de agua dulce.

Especies en estudio:

Especies vegetales colonizadas por HMA y por ESO.

Métodos:

Fueron analizadas las propiedades del suelo y de la columna de agua, la composición florística y la colonización fúngica radical; se identificó molecularmente la comunidad intrarradical de HMA en una planta.

Resultados:

Los suelos Gleysol estuvieron anegados durante la estación lluviosa. La mayoría de las plantas identificadas fueron herbáceas; dominaron Cyperus articulatus y Mimosa pigra. Siete especies vegetales exhibieron co-colonización diferencial por HMA y ESO. Muestreos subsecuentes durante un año bajo condiciones de inundación/secas demostraron que C. articulatus y M. pigra estuvieron preferentemente colonizadas por hongos ESO y HMA, respectivamente. Una correlación positiva entre el O2 disuelto en la columna de agua y la colonización fúngica fue observada en C. articulatus. Glomerales y Archaeosporales fueron molecularmente identificados en el interior de las raíces de M. pigra conteniendo arbúsculos.

Conclusiones:

Los hallazgos resaltan una coexistencia diferencial entre HMA y ESO en las raíces; la colonización fúngica estuvo influenciada por la inundación/estiaje en el humedal; la comunidad de HMA en el interior de las raíces de M. pigra incluye por lo menos miembros de cuatro clados.

Palabras clave: Cyperus articulatus; gleysol; hongo endófito septado oscuro; hongo micorrízico arbuscular; Mimosa pigra; neotrópico

Wetlands are ecosystems with shallow water or saturated soils that possess unique flora and fauna adapted to these unusual environmental conditions. They share common features with both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. Wetlands are distinguished from terrestrial systems because soil is often anaerobic. Wetlands vegetation is dominated by trees, shrubs, grasses, and other large plants, in contrast to aquatic systems (van der Valk 2012). It is estimated a global wetland area of 135-1,782 × 106 ha in the Neotropics (Ramsar Convention Secretariat 2010). High biodiversity and productivity are found in wetlands, providing diverse ecosystem services including fishing, fruits, carbon sequestration, nutrient cycling, and water decontamination, among others. Mexican neotropical region harbors several freshwater wetlands which are flooded during the rainy season.

In nature, most plants are colonized by different groups of fungi; the fungal diversity in the roots of a single plant species growing in a single sampling location has been reported to cover all phyla (Vandenkoornhuyse et al. 2002). The most commonly found fungal groups inhabiting plant roots comprise arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and dark septate endophytes (DSE). AMF [Phylum Mucoromycota, Subphylum Glomeromycotina (Spatafora et al. 2016)] associate with the roots of more than 80 % of vascular plants under a mutualistic interaction denominated arbuscular mycorrhiza (AM) (Smith & Read 2008). AMF facilitate the assimilation of less mobile nutrients, such as phosphorus (P), through the development of an extended network of hyphae in the soil (Parniske 2008). DSE are mainly Ascomycota, which are capable of colonizing the roots of nearly all plant species (Jumpponen & Trappe 1998). Knowledge on the roles that the plant root-DSE association plays continues to be very limited. The roles that have been suggested include involvement in enhancing plant survival and performance during periods of stress (Newsham 2011, Mandyam & Jumpponen 2015). DSE interact with their host plant and/or other endophytes, synthesizing bioactive metabolites, which may play important ecological roles, and may lead to biotechnological applications (Kusari et al. 2012). In a tripartite plant-DSE-AMF interaction, a synergistic relationship has been hypothesized between both fungal groups in relation to P availability and uptake by plants: DSE increase the P pool in the rhizosphere, and AMF are responsible for P transfer to the host (Della Monica et al. 2015).

AMF and DSE exhibit aerobic metabolism and have been reported to co-exist inside the roots of submerged plants in temperate wetlands (Fuchs & Haselwandter 2004, Sraj-Krzic et al. 2006, Kohout et al. 2012). However, little information is available on the diversity and co-colonization of these two fungal groups and the role that they play in neotropical wetlands, where the water column exhibits a reduction, or even the absence of dissolved oxygen. Particularly in Mexico, there is little information on soil fungi (Sarukhán et al. 2015).

Based on the species endemism of vascular plants and terrestrial vertebrates, the southern half of the country corresponds to the Mesoamerican biodiversity hotspot, which is threatened by habitat destruction and land-use change (Myers et al. 2000). Considering the role of plants as umbrella species, these areas also function as hotspots for other, less well-studied organisms such as the soil fungi associated with them (Stork & Habel 2014). Up to 2012, 95 known species of AMF had been reported in Mexico, considered as a high AMF diversity reservoir linked with plant and ecosystem diversity (Montaño et al. 2012). Scarce information exists on the diversity and roles of DSE in neotropical ecosystems (Heredia-Acuña et al. 2014). The aim of the present work was to describe plant root interactions with AMF and DSE in a neotropical freshwater wetland characterized by its hypoxic or anoxic conditions and belonging to a biodiversity hotspot region.

Materials and methods

Description of the study area. This work was conducted in the seasonally flooded La Mixtequilla neotropical wetland in Veracruz state, Eastern Mexico. La Mixtequilla is located in the Sistema Lagunar Alvarado, which was designated as the Ramsar Site 1355 (Matthews 2013). Blanco River traverses this wetland. The climate is warm, Aw2(i’)w” type, with an average annual temperature of 25.9 °C; in the coldest month, the temperature reaches 22.6 °C, while in the warmest months, it rises to 28.3 °C. Average annual rainfall is 1,531.8 mm, with rain beginning in June and ending in October. Generally, the dry season runs from January to June (Viccon-Pale et al. 2016), with the wetland flooded during the remainder of the year. This region has been negatively impacted by industrial and domestic pollution, by land-use change, as well as by livestock, agriculture, and fishing (Rivera-Becerril et al. 2008, Cejudo-Espinosa et al. 2009, Moreno-Casasola et al. 2009).

Field work. For soil analysis, two sampling stations were established at the eastern and western banks of the Blanco River: Don Rufino (18° 31´ 57.9" N, 95° 57´ 35.7" W; 2 m ASL), and El Llanete (18° 31´ 40.2" N, 95° 56´ 45.9" W; 2 m ASL), respectively. Both sites are employed as livestock grasslands, and they exhibit differences in plant communities, particularly, in the abundance of some plant species. During the dry season, five plots (1 m2 each) were randomly established at each pastureland (El Llanete and Don Rufino). Three soil samples from each plot were taken from the top 20 cm of soil using a spade. Throughout the whole year, considering their high abundance, representative plants from these five plots at each station were collected (roots, shoots, flowers) for identification. Root fungal colonization was estimated once a year in each plant species shown in table 4. In addition, it was carried out repeated sampling for a year in order to monitor fungal colonization in Cyperus articulatus from Don Rufino, and in Mimosa pigra from El Llanete, because these were the dominant species. An aliquot of each root system from the top 20 cm of soil was stored at 4 °C to quantify fungal colonization.

Table 1 Physical and chemical properties in soils of the pasturelands Don Rufino and El Llanete at La Mixtequilla wetland (mean ± SE; n = 15, except for sand, silt, and clay, where n = 5). 

Don Rufino El Llanete
Physical properties
Bulk density (g cm−3) 1.2 ± 0.01 1.2 ± 0.02
Particle density (g cm−3) 2.2 ± 0.04* 2.3 ± 0.01*
Porosity (%) 46.1 ± 0.89* 49.1 ± 0.77*
Sand (%) 15.5 ± 2.10 11.5 ± 0.82
Silt (%) 12.1 ± 1.76 28.7 ± 11.70
Clay (%) 72.4 ± 0.93 59.8 ± 12.13
Texture Clay Clay
Color (dry) 2.5Y 4/1 2.5Y 4/1
Color (wet) Gley1 3/N Gley1 3/N
Chemical properties
pH 6.5 ± 0.04 6.3 ± 0.15
Organic matter (%) 6.2 ± 0.48 6.9 ± 0.49
Organic carbon (%) 3.6 ± 0.28 4.0 ± 0.28
Total nitrogen (%) 0.3 ± 0.02 0.3 ± 0.02
Available phosphorus (mg kg−1) 9.9 ± 0.45* 17.0 ± 2.68*
Cation exchange capacity (meq 100 g−1) 40.3 ± 0.51 39.1 ± 0.72
Ca2+ (meq100 g−1) 40.0 ± 1.13 37.0 ± 1.56
Na+ (meq 100 g−1) 6.3 ± 0.31* 11.1 ± 1.20*
Mg2+ (meq 100 g−1) 3.7 ± 0.64* 7.4 ± 1.53*
K+ (meq 100 g−1) 2.6 ± 0.19* 3.5 ± 0.31*

Asterisks indicate significant differences (p <0.05) between both pasturelands, following a Student’s t-test.

Table 2 Water column properties during the flood season of the Don Rufino (DR) and El Llanete (EL) pasturelands at La Mixtequilla wetland (mean ± SE; n = 252, except for orthophosphate concentration, where n = 4). 

Temperature (°C) O2 concentration (mg L-1) Orthophosphate concentration (mg L-1)
Sampling date (month/year) DR EL DR EL DR EL
09/11 34.5 ± 1.7 30.1 ± 0.4 2.6 ± 0.7 0.5 ± 0.1 0.312 ± 0.22 0.196 ± 0.09
10/11 29.9 ± 1.5 27.5 ± 0.5 2.3 ± 0.4 4.3 ± 0.2 0.145 ± 0.01 0.028 ± 0.02
11/11 28.1 ± 1.3 28.0 ± 0.5 3.3 ± 0.4 2.4 ± 0.5 0.033 ± 0.06 0.050 ± 0.02
12/11 27.7 ± 1.0 24.7 ± 0.3 3.0 ± 0.7 1.7 ± 0.3 0.104 ± 0.04 0.335 ± 0.28
01/12 24.9 ± 1.5 21.4 ± 0.2 3.3 ± 0.6 1.2 ± 0.4 0.002 ± 0.004 0.044 ± 0.04
02/12 21.7 ± 1.8 25.3 ± 1.4 5.5 ± 1.1 0.7 ± 0.3 0.117 ± 0.06 0.042 ± 0.03
04/12
06/12
07/12 30.9 ± 2.3 30.6 ± 1.2 1.2 ± 0.5 1.5 ± 0.7 0.179 ± 0.09 0.108 ± 0.01
09/12 30.6 ± 1.1 29.7 ± 1.0 0.4 ± 0.2 0.6 ± 0.2 0.163 ± 0.01 0.133 ± 0.03

-, Absence of water column during the dry season.

Table 3 Representative plant species in two pasturelands at La Mixtequilla wetland. 

Family Plant species Observations
Don Rufino pastureland
POLYPODIOPHYTA
Salvianiaceae Salvinia minima Baker Aquatic fern, native
MAGNOLIOPHYTA
LILIOPSIDA
Alismataceae Echinodorus paniculatus
Micheli
Herbaceous, native
Cyperaceae Cyperus articulatus L. Perennial, herbaceous, native
Poaceae Echinochloa crus-pavonis (Kunth) Schult. Perennial, herbaceous, native
Hymenachne amplexicaulis (Rudge) Nees Perennial, herbaceous, native
Paspalum repens P.J. Bergius Perennial, herbaceous, native
Pontederiaceae Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.) Solms Aquatic, herbaceous, exotic
MAGNOLIOPSIDA
Bignoniaceae Crescentia cujete L. Tree, native
Boraginaceae Heliotropium indicum L. Herbaceous, native
H. macrostachyum (DC.) Hemsl. Herbaceous, native
Euphorbiaceae Chamaesyce prostrata (Aiton) Small Herbaceous, native
Fabaceae Lonchocarpus hondurensis Benth. Tree, native
Pithecellobium dulce (Roxb.) Benth. Tree, native
Mimosa pigra L. Shrub, native
Neptunia natans W. Treob. Perennial, herbaceous, native
Maranthaceae Thalia geniculata L. Aquatic, herbaceous, native
Solanaceae Solanum rostratum Dunal Invasive, herbaceous, native
Verbenaceae Phyla nodiflora (L.) Greene Herbaceous, native
El Llanete pastureland
POLYPODIOPHYTA
Marsileaceae Marsilea crotophora D.M. Johnson Aquatic fern, native
Salvinia minima Baker Aquatic fern, native
MAGNOLIOPHYTA
LILIOPSIDA
Cyperaceae Cladium jamaicense Crantz Perennial, herbaceous, native
Cyperus articulatus L. Perennial, herbaceous, native
Fimbristylis spadicea (L.) Vahl Perennial, herbaceous, native
Nymphaceae Nymphaea ampla DC. Perennial, herbaceous, native
Poaceae Paspalum fasciculatum Willd. ex Flüggé Perennial, herbaceous, native
Paspalum sp. Perennial, herbaceous
MAGNOLIOPSIDA
Acanthaceae Ruellia geminiflora Kunth Herbaceous, native
R. paniculata L. Herbaceous, native
Alismataceae Echinodorus paniculatus
Micheli
Herbaceous, native
Arecaceae Sabal mexicana Mart. Arborescent, native
Asteraceae Erigeron aff. heteromorphus Herbaceous, native
Euphorbiaceae Euphorbia marginata Pursh Herbaceous, exotic
Fabaceae Crotalaria pallida Aiton Herbaceous, native
Mimosa pigra L. Shrub, native
Neptunia plena (L.) Benth. Seedling, native
Sesbania herbacea (Mill.) McVaugh Herbaceous, native
Lythraceae Cuphea spp. Herbaceous, native
Maranthaceae Thalia geniculata L. Seedling, native
Onagraceae Ludwigia helminthorrhiza (Mart.) H. Hara Prostrate, herbaceous, native
L. leptocarpa (Nutt.) H. Hara Aquatic, herbaceous, native
Solanaceae Solanum lanceifolium Jacq. Shrub, native

All of the plant species follow the nomenclature of vascular flora by MEXU Herbarium (http://www.ib.unam.mx/botanica/herbario/), and W3 Tropicos Missouri Botanical Garden (http://www.tropicos.org)

Table 4 Root colonization by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and dark septate endophytes in plants established at two pasturelands of La Mixtequilla wetland (mean ± SE; n = 3). Evaluation was carried out once in a year. 

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi Dark septate endophytes
Plant species M (%) A (%) V C (%) MS (%)
Don Rufino pastureland
Echinochloa cruspavonis b 7.7 ± 4.7 0.1 ± 0.1 + 3.9 ± 2.2 0.5 ± 0.3
Echinodorus paniculatus b 0 0 - 0 0
El Llanete pastureland
Sesbania herbaceaa (flowering period) 29.9 ± 4.0* 2.6 ± 1.0 + 4.5 ± 1.9* 0.6 ± 0.4
Sesbania herbaceaa (fructification period) 53.4 ± 1.5* 3.5 ± 1.2 + 8.7 ± 4.1* 0.6 ± 0.4
Ruellia geminiflora a 17.4 ± 7.5 1.7 ± 1.0 + 7.1 ± 2.9 0.2 ± 0.2
Fimbristylis spadicea a 3.8 ± 2.8 0 + 16.0 ± 4.3 0.6 ± 0.1
Thalia geniculata b 5.3 ± 1.8 0 + 4.5 ± 1.5 0.3 ± 0.2

M, intensity of mycorrhizal colonization in the root system; A, abundance of arbuscules in the root system; V, vesicles (+, present; -, absent); C, intensity of colonization by DSE in the root system; MS, abundance of microsclerotia in the root system; a, unflooded plants; b, flooded plants; asterisks indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) between M % and C % in S. herbacea, following a Student’s t-test

For water quality evaluation, two sampling stations were also established at each pastureland, Don Rufino, and El Llanete. During the rainy season, both livestock grasslands were flooded. Water depth was determined with a wooden ruler. Temperature and dissolved oxygen concentration in the water column were measured with a Hydrolab DS5 multi-parameter instrument (Hach Company, Loveland, CO, USA) one day per month, from September 2011 to September 2012, each hour (36 recordings during 6 min) from 11:00 to 17:00 h. Additionally, a water sample was collected every two hours from 11:00 to 17:00 h in plastic bottles and stored at 4 °C for orthophosphate (PO4 3-) estimation.

Soil and water chemical analyses. Soil samples (1.5 kg) were dried at room temperature and sieved through a 2.0 mm-diameter sieve. Bulk and particle densities were measured using a pycnometer with the paraffin-coated clod method and the undisturbed soil core method, respectively (USDA 2004). Soil porosity was calculated according to USDA (2011). Soil texture was determined following the Gee & Bauder method (1986), and soil color, according to the Munsell notation. Soil pH was measured in water with a glass electrode potentiometer (Orion STR 3) at a 1:2.5 ratio (w/v). Soil organic matter (SOM) content was determined employing the wet combustion method (USDA 2004); organic carbon (OC) and total nitrogen (TN) were calculated from these results as follows: OC = SOM/1.724, TN = SOM (0.05). The concentration of available P in soils was determined using the USDA method (2004). Cation-exchange capacity (CEC) was calculated by saturation with ammonium acetate and analysis with EDTA (Jackson 1982), the content of exchangeable cations Ca2+ and Mg2+ by the Versenate method (USDA 2004), and Na+ and K+, by flame photometry (Corning 400). Orthophosphate (PO4 3-) concentration in water was determined following the 4500-P E ascorbic acid method (APHA-WEF 2005).

Root colonization measurements. Identification of plant species was conducted according to López-Ríos & Rosas-López (1988) and to Calderón de Rzedowski & Rzedowski (2001). To estimate fungal colonization, roots from three individual of each plant species were cleared with 10 % KOH and stained with 0.05 % trypan blue (Phillips & Hayman 1970) in lactoglycerol. From each root system, 30, 1-cm root segments were placed on a slide with glycerol and observed under a light microscope. The ocurrence of Paris (absence of intercellular hyphae, presence of intracellular hyphal coils) and Arum (intercellular hyphal growth, terminal arbuscules on intracellular hyphal branches) morphotypes of AM was qualitatively recorded (Dickson et al. 2007). Levels of AMF colonization were calculated considering the intensity of mycorrhizal colonization (M %: hyphae, vesicles, and arbuscules) and the abundance of arbuscules (A %) in the root system (Trouvelot et al. 1986). This methodology was also applied for estimating root colonization by DSE; the same 30, 1-cm root segments that had been previously clarified and stained were evaluated for estimating intensity of colonization (C %: septate hyphae and microsclerotia) and abundance of microsclerotia (MS %) in the root system.

Molecular identification of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. A composited sample of flooded M. pigra roots containing arbuscules from El Llanete was washed with tap water, disinfected, and rinsed with sterilized water. Extraction of genomic DNA was carried out following the DNAzol Reagent kit protocol. DNA was resuspended in ultrapure water; its concentration was estimated in a NanoDrop 2000c spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Wilmington, DE, USA). A nested-PCR protocol was applied for amplifying ribosomal sequences of AMF (Krüger et al. 2009). The first PCR mix (25 μl total volume) was prepared as follows: buffer 1X 1.5 mM MgCl2; 0.2 mM of each deoxynucleotide triphosphates (dNTP); 0.2 μM of each primer (SSUmAf1-2 mix, LSUmAr1-4); 1 U Platinum Taq polymerase (Invitrogen, Brazil), and 10 ng DNA as template. PCR reactions were performed in a MultiGene Thermal Cycler (Model TC9600-G; Edison, NJ, USA) with the following parameters: initial denaturation at 94 ºC/2 min; 32 cycles of denaturation at 94 ºC/30 s; annealing at 50 ºC/30 s; elongation at 72 ºC/2 min, and a final elongation at 72 ºC/10 min. Amplified fragments were used after a 1:10 dilution in ultrapure water. The second PCR mix (25 μl total volume) was prepared using primer mixes SSUmCf1-3 and LSUmBr1-5. The same PCR conditions were employed, except that the annealing temperature was reduced to 48 °C, and that Taq polymerase (2 U) and MgCl2 (3 mM) were doubled. Products were visualized by electrophoresis and stained with ethidium bromide. Amplification bands of ~ 1.5 kb for SSUmCf/LSUmBr were cut from the gel and DNA was extracted with the QIAquick Gel Extraction kit (Qiagen, Oregon, USA). PCR bands were ligated to pGEM-T vector (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) and used to transform competent Escherichia coli JM-109 cells (Promega). Plasmid minipreps were conducted (QIAprep Spin Miniprep Kit), and the clones were sequenced with the aid of an ABI Prism 3100 Automated Sequencer (LANGEBIO, CINVESTAV-Irapuato, Mexico). Sequencing was unidirectional and conducted using the T7 primer. The Glomeromycotina origin of the sequences was confirmed by BLAST-N comparison with sequences deposited in GenBank (NCBI) and Glomeromycotina dedicated database MaarjAM (Öpik et al. 2010). Multiple alignment was performed using MUSCLE (Edgar 2004), and the alignment was manually optimized with Jalview software (Waterhouse et al. 2009). The evolutionary history was inferred by using the Maximum Likelihood method based on the Kimura 2-parameter model (Kimura 1980). The tree with the highest log likelihood (-3,947.04) is shown. The percentage of trees in which the associated taxa clustered together is shown next to the branches. The tree was drawn to scale, with branch lengths measured in the number of substitutions per site. The analysis involved 54 nucleotide sequences. All positions with less than 95 % site coverage were eliminated. That is, fewer than 5 % alignment gaps, missing data, and ambiguous bases were allowed at any position. There was a total of 453 positions in the final dataset. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA7 (Kumar et al. 2016).

Statistical analyses. Data were checked for normal distribution with the Shapiro-Wilk test. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) at a significance level of 0.05 was performed on fungal colonization variables. Whenever there were significant differences, Tukey tests were conducted to determine differences among homogeneous groups of means (p < 0.05). Comparisons for each soil property between both pasturelands, as well as comparisons of AMF/DSE colonization in plant species, were subjected to a Student’s t-test. Pearson correlations were carried out between AMF and DSE colonization in M. pigra and C. articulatus, as well as between properties of water and fungal colonization. These analyses were computed using Origin 8.6 software.

Results

Soil and water column properties in pasturelands. Concerning soil properties, bulk density was similar in both pasturelands under study; particle density and porosity were significantly higher (p < 0.05) in El Llanete than in Don Rufino (Table 1). Soils from both pasturelands were dominated by clay particles (60 and 72 %), with a clay texture; no significant differences were observed between pasturelands when comparing concentrations of sand, silt, and clay in soils. Both soils were dark gray (2.5Y 4/1) when dry, and very dark gray (Gley1 3/N) when wet. Among chemical properties, there were no statistically significant differences between pasturelands on the pH, organic matter content, organic carbon, total nitrogen and CEC. The CEC complex was dominated by Ca2+, which did not show significant differences between pasturelands; Na+, Mg2+, and K+ were significantly higher (p < 0.05) at El Llanete. The available P in soil, measured as orthophosphate, was significantly higher (p < 0.05) at El Llanete than at Don Rufino by nearly two-fold (Table 1).

During the flood season, the water column was shallow in both pasturelands (25.1 ± 10.5 cm). The highest water temperatures were recorded in September at Don Rufino (34.5 ºC) and July at El Llanete (30.6 ºC); lowest temperatures were registered during winter at both sites (Table 2). Higher levels of dissolved oxygen were found during February at Don Rufino (5.5 mg L-1) and in October at El Llanete (4.3 mg L-1). Orthophosphate in water was higher in September at Don Rufino (0.3 mg L-1) and in December at El Llanete (0.3 mg L-1).

Floristic composition. In both pasturelands, the plant community known as “popal” was predominant with majority of herbaceous native species from Mexico (Table 3). At the Don Rufino pastureland, 18 plant species belonging to 12 families were identified; some of these, such as Thalia geniculata, Cyperus articulatus, and Mimosa pigra, are adapted to both flood and dry conditions; others (Salvinia minima and Eichhornia crassipes) exhibit aquatic habits. During the flood season, the most abundant plant species were C. articulatus, Echinodorus paniculatus, and T. geniculata, while during the dry season, the latter predominated. In the El Llanete pastureland, 23 plant species belonging to 14 families were identified; some of these, such as T. geniculata and M. pigra, tolerate both flood and dry seasons; others (Marsilea crotophora, S. minima, and Nymphaea ampla) demonstrate aquatic habits. During the whole year, including flood and dry seasons, the most abundant plant species was M. pigra, followed by T. geniculata.

Fungal colonization of roots. As a first insight into the status of AMF and DSE interactions in the wetland, six plant species from both pasturelands were sampled during the flood or dry seasons and analyzed for the presence of these fungi (Table 4). Echinodorus paniculatus did not exhibit any fungal colonization, while five plant species were co-colonized by both fungal groups at different levels. Concerning AMF, S. herbacea during fructification showed the highest percentage of root colonization (M = 53 %), as well as the highest abundance of arbuscules in the whole root system (A = 3.5 %). Vesicles were present in all plant species, with S. herbacea exhibiting the highest abundance. Arum and Paris-type morphologies of AM were visualized in all plant roots, but the former predominated. Fimbristylis spadicea demonstrated highest intensity of DSE root colonization (C = 16 %), while in the remaining plants, this was ≤ 9 %. The abundance of microsclerotia in the whole root system (MS) was ≤ 1 % in all cases. In S. herbacea, the percentage of root colonization by AMF (M) was significantly higher (p < 0.05) than that of DSE (C). Finally, S. herbacea in fructification attained highest levels of root colonization by both groups of fungi (M + C = 62 %).

Repeated monitoring of fungal colonization in the roots of two plant species. In C. articulatus roots, AMF colonization was present at each sampling time (Figure 1). Only hyphae and vesicles were detected, and arbuscules were absent; Paris-type morphology predominated, as judged by presence of intracellular hyphal coils and absence of intercellular hyphae. The highest intensity of root colonization (M = 13.5 %) was observed in July, but without significant differences among the sampling months. DSE colonization was also present throughout the year. The percentage of root colonization (C) was < 10 % in flooded plants, increasing during the dry season, demonstrating the significant, highest peak (p < 0.05) in July 2012 (C = 25 %) when the second flood period started. Highest abundance of microsclerotia in the whole root system (MS) was also observed in July 2012 (MS = 4 %), but without differences among sampling months. During the dry season, the percentage of root colonization by DSE was always higher than that of AMF, particularly in April, with significant differences (p < 0.05). In July 2012, C. articulatus attained highest levels of colonization by both groups of fungi in the whole root system (M + C = 38.2 %). A Pearson correlation (r) considering all data of intensity of root colonization by AMF (M) and DSE (C) in C. articulatus, showed a significant correlation (r = 0.62; p < 0.05) between both fungal groups.

Figure 1 Root colonization by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and dark septate endophytes in Cyperus articulatus established in the pastureland Don Rufino at La Mixtequilla wetland (mean ± SE; n = 3). Evaluation was carried out nine times in a year. M, intensity of mycorrhizal colonization in the root system; C, intensity of colonization by DSE in the root system; MS, abundance of microsclerotia in the root system; broken lines indicate plants under flooding conditions; asterisks indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) between M % and C % (Student’s t-test); different letter on the bars indicate differences among homogeneous groups of means (p < 0.05), following an ANOVA. 

AMF and DSE colonized M. pigra roots during the whole annual cycle (Figure 2). Concerning AMF, intensity of root colonization (M) was significantly highest (p < 0.05) in February 2012 during the flooded season (61 %). The highest abundance of arbuscules in the whole root system (A) was observed under dry conditions. During nearly all the year, few vesicles were present in the roots; Arum and Paris-type morphologies were present. Concerning DSE, the highest percentage of root colonization (C) was observed in April (11 %), without differences among sampling months; abundance of microsclerotia in the whole root system (MS) was < 1 %. In February 2012, M. pigra attained highest levels of colonization by both groups of fungi in the whole root system (M + C = 62 %). At 6 sampling times, colonization by AMF was significantly higher (p < 0.05) than that of DSE. There was no correlation between intensity of root colonization by AMF (M) and DSE (C) in M. pigra, following a Pearson test.

Figure 2 Root colonization by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and dark septate endophytes in Mimosa pigra established in the pastureland El Llanete at La Mixtequilla wetland (mean ± SE; n = 3). Evaluation was carried out nine times in a year. M, intensity of mycorrhizal colonization in the root system; A, abundance of arbuscules in the root system; C, intensity of colonization by DSE in the root system; MS, abundance of microsclerotia in the root system; broken lines indicate plants under flooding conditions; asterisks indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) between M % and C % (Student’s t-test); different letter on the bars indicate differences among homogeneous groups of means (p < 0.05), following an ANOVA. 

Relations between fungal root colonization and water column properties. Significant correlations (p < 0.05) were observed between fungal colonization parameters and water column properties (Table 5). In C. articulatus established in Don Rufino pastureland, a negative correlation between M or C and temperature was observed. In addition, higher concentrations of dissolved oxygen in the water column favored root colonization by AMF (M) and DSE (C). A negative correlation between C and the concentration of orthophosphates was also identified. In M. pigra established in El Llanete, negative correlations were identified between C or MS and temperature; dissolved oxygen was negatively correlated with M and A. Finally, higher orthophosphate concentrations in the water column increased the abundance of arbuscules (A) in the whole root system.

Table 5 Pearson correlation (r) between water column properties and fungal colonization in Cyperus articulatus and Mimosa pigra established at La Mixtequilla wetland. 

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi Dark septate endophytes
Plant species M (r) A (r) C (r) MS (r)
Cyperus articulatus
Temperature (°C) -0.790* - -0.951* -0.359
O2 concentration (mg L-1) 0.641* - 0.785* 0.106
PO43— concentration (mg L-1) -0.304 - -0.607* -0.491
Mimosa pigra
Temperature (°C) -0.121 -0.473 -0.977* -0.844*
O2 concentration (mg L-1) -0.817* -0.864* -0.469 -0.486
PO4 3— concentration (mg L-1) 0.320 0.616* 0.147 -0.306

M, intensity of mycorrhizal colonization in the root system; A, abundance of arbuscules in the root system; C, intensity of colonization by DSE in the root system; MS, abundance of microsclerotia in the root system. Asterisks indicate significant correlations (p < 0.05)

Molecular identification of AMF in Mimosa pigra roots. Because M. pigra was highly colonized by Glomeromycotina, identification of AMF inside roots containing arbuscules was addressed by a molecular approach targeting fungal rDNA sequences (SSU-ITS-LSU) (Krüger et al. 2009). The size of the final amplified fragments was ~ 1.5 kb, corresponding to that expected for Glomeromycotina species. These amplicons were employed to construct a SSU-ITS-LSU rDNA library. Fifty recombinant clones of E. coli were randomly selected and subcultured; isolated plasmid DNA was digested with EcoRI enzyme in order to corroborate the exact size of inserts; 38 positive samples were sequenced, but only 30 of these exhibited good sequence quality. No chimeric amplicon sequences were detected, and all of the sequences obtained showed a high degree of similarity to Glomeromycotina SSU-ITS-LSU rDNA sequences. All the 30 sequences were submitted to the GenBank database at NCBI (accession numbers from MK418498 to MK418527). Phylogenetic analyses revealed four monophyletic ribotypes (Figure 3); three of these belonged to the Order Glomerales and one, to Archaeosporales. Concerning Glomerales, 11 of the sequences were grouped with Rhizophagus irregularis/Rh. proliferum, and seven sequences showed affinity with Rhizophagus diaphanum; a group of two sequences were related to Glomus. Estimates of evolutionary divergence between representative sequences of clades observed in the tree confirmed these ribotypes of Glomerales (Table 6). Finally, a group of ten sequences were included in the Order Archaeosporales and were closely related with Archaeospora.

Figure 3 Molecular phylogenetic analysis by Maximum Likelihood method representing SSU-ITS-LSU rDNA sequences of Glomeromycotina fungi colonizing Mimosa pigra flooded roots at La Mixtequilla wetland. Four identified ribotypes are indicated. 

Table 6 Estimates of evolutionary divergence between representative ribotypes observed in the phylogenetic tree representing SSU-ITS-LSU rDNA sequences of Glomerales colonizing Mimosa pigra flooded roots. The number of base substitutions per site between sequences are shown. Analyses were conducted using the Maximum Composite Likelihood model and it involved five nucleotides sequences. All positions containing gaps and missing data were eliminated. There was a total of 517 positions in the final dataset. Best hits were following NCBI or MaarjAM databases. 

Sequence Distance Max identity (%) Best hit Propose name
MK418527/1-555 96.3 AY744275 Rhizophagus
MK418515/1-561 0.038 99 HG969372 Rhizophagus
MK418522/1-551 0.211 0.19 97 AJ972463 Rhizophagus
MK418523/1-551 0.183 0.163 0.028 97 AM972463 Rhizophagus
MK418519/1-566 0.303 0.291 0.288 0.275 94 AM384981 Glomus

Discussion

Soil and water properties in pasturelands. Soils from both pasturelands in the La Mixtequilla wetland showed typical characteristics of Gleysols, such as clay texture and saturation with groundwater for long periods, which develop a typical gleyic color pattern and favor a prolonged O2-deficit phenomenon (Driessen et al. 2001). The significantly higher concentrations of available P, Na+, Mg2+, and K+ at El Llanete in comparison with the Don Rufino pastureland could be attributed to the different strategies of soil management utilized at these sites (agricultural and/or livestock breeding), as well as to biological activity. Driessen et al. (2001) state that Gleysols in depressions or lowlands possess higher organic matter, CEC, P, and K+ than adjacent upland soils; at El Llanete, the flooding season is normally longer than at Don Rufino (Rivera-Becerril et al. 2008), which can influence a higher transport of nutrients from uplands via the Blanco River. River nutrient contribution into the floodplain constitutes an elemental process for floodplain production (Junk et al. 1989). Fertility is also favored by fine soil texture and slow rate of organic matter decomposition (Driessen et al. 2001). Flatlands, temperate to warm temperatures, proliferation of plant cover, and its contribution to high levels of autochthonous organic matter, comprise the causes for very low levels of dissolved oxygen in the water columns of both pasturelands. In general, moisture, temperature seasonality, soil fertility, and/or substrate availability control wetland microbial processes (Gutknecht et al. 2006).

Floristic composition and fungal colonization in roots. Gleysols are covered with swamp vegetation and are normally used for extensive grazing (Driessen et al. 2001) of livestock, as occurs at La Mixtequilla. The “popal” plant community is normally present in the neotropical region of the Atlantic coast of Mexico (Rzedowski 1986). In both pasturelands, most plant species belonged to Magnoliopsida, and were herbaceous, consistently with a report from other neotropical wetland (Moreno-Casasola et al. 2009). Three exotic plant species (E. crassipes, E. marginata, and C. pallida) were detected; the free-floating E. crassipes is known as one of the worst macrophyte invaders (Thomaz et al. 2015); in addition to its presence in Don Rufino pastureland, large areas of the Blanco River were covered by this plant species. M. pigra, native to the tropics, is a well-recognized invasive plant in Southeast Asia and Australia (Lonsdale 1993). At La Mixtequilla, M. pigra is adapted to both flooded and dry conditions throughout the year; local people normally attempt to eliminate it in order to avoid the perturbation of agricultural practices, livestock breeding, and fishing.

Seven plant species (C. articulatus, E. cruspavonis, M. pigra, F. spadicea, R. geminiflora, S. herbacea, and T. geniculata) showed a differential co-colonization between AMF and DSE in roots, either under dry or flooded conditions, as reported for other wetlands (Fuchs & Haselwandter 2004, Weishampel & Bedford 2006, de Marins et al. 2009, Sudová et al. 2011). Flooded M. pigra showed the highest abundance of arbuscules, indicating that this symbiosis is functional under flooded conditions at low levels of dissolved O2 (see later). Weishampel & Bedford (2006) consider that Magnoliopsida exhibit more affinity for AMF than DSE, as observed in three plant species analyzed in this work (M. pigra, R. geminiflora and S. herbacea).

Repeated monitoring of fungal colonization in roots from two plant species. Cyperus articulatus, a native plant from Mexico, is well adapted to tropical wetlands, where is used as forage (Olivares et al. 2002), as observed at the Don Rufino pastureland. This plant species exhibited low levels (up to 13.5 %) of AMF colonization, but only hyphae and vesicles were present in roots. Members of Cyperaceae typically show low mycotrophy; their mycorrhizal status could be influenced strongly by environmental conditions such as flooding/dry periods (Muthukumar et al. 2004). The lack of arbuscules has been previously reported in cultivated C. rotundus (Muthukumar et al. 1997) or established in a tropical ecosystem (Muthukumar & Udaiyan 2002). In contrast, high levels of DSE root colonization indicate that these could play a more relevant role in this sedge. Low root colonization by DSE during the flooded season (<10 %), in comparison with the higher levels observed during the beginning/ending of the dry period (19-25%), could suggest that DSE are sensitive to low oxygen concentrations in the water column. In April, during the dry season, a four-fold reduction in colonization by AMF, in contrast with increased colonization by DSE, is probably a consequence of fungal competition for resources during the grazing time (García et al. 2012), as was observed for the grass species Bouteloua gracilis (Medina-Roldán et al. 2008). In this study, a significant correlation was observed between root colonization by AMF and DSE during the annual cycle in C. articulatus. As previously reported for some plant species (Ruotsalainen et al. 2002), this positive correlation might indicate a synergism between both groups of fungi.

The native plant from the tropics, M. pigra, is present in different ecosystems. Members of Fabaceae are highly mycotrophic, mainly when environmental conditions threaten plant development (Azcón 2000). Considering that M. pigra demonstrated high levels of root colonization by AMF in the freshwater wetland under study (M = 7-61 %; A = up to 17.7 %), it can be postulated that AMF could facilitate the spread of this plant species, as suggested for Ambrosia artemisiifolia growing in disturbed sites (Fumanal et al. 2006). In addition, M. pigra also interacts with nitrogen-fixing bacteria harboring in root nodules (Parker et al. 2007). These bacteria, together with AMF, might render this plant species highly competitive for colonizing stressful environments conferring a better nutritional status. AMF colonization in some Mimosa species is required for enhancing root nodulation (Lammel et al. 2015).

In this wetland, it was observed that properties prevailing in the water column influence fungal root colonization. High temperatures tended to reduce fungal colonization by AMF and DSE in both plants (M and C in C. articulatus, and C and MS in M. pigra), and DSE appeared to be more susceptible than AMF to high temperatures. Within this context, plant-root colonization by AMF was reduced when the temperature exceeded 30 °C; elevated temperatures might increase plant night respiration resulting in diminished photosynthate for root-inhabiting fungi (Zhu et al. 2011). High concentrations of dissolved O2 in the water column favored higher M and C in C. articulatus; the negative correlation between dissolved O2 in the water column and M and A in M. pigra could suggest a particular root physiology for supplying dissolved O2. A floating growth habit and aerenchyma are root adaptations described in M. pigra living in a flooded environment in a neotropical ecosystem (James et al. 2001). Finally, the negative correlation in C. articulatus between C and the orthophosphate concentration could indicate that DSE are not involved in P nutrition in this plant. In contrast, concentrations of orthophosphates in the water column at El Llanete, which correlated positively with A in M. pigra, pointed out the role of AMF in transferring P from soils and/or the column water to the plant, even under suboxic conditions.

Molecular identification of AMF in Mimosa pigra roots. This is the first time, to the best of our knowledge, in which an AMF community of flooded roots from the shrub M. pigra established in a freshwater wetland was molecularly identified. Arbuscules confirmed visually the presence of AMF inside roots; molecular analysis allowed to identify the whole fungal community, constituted by members of Rhizophagus, and Glomus (Order Glomerales), as well as by Archaeospora (Order Archaeosporales). All identified AMF are reported to produce arbuscules; observed vesicles inside roots could belong to Rhizophagus and Glomus since members of Archaeospora do not produce them (Oehl et al. 2011). Glomerales, the largest Order of Glomeromycotina, predominated inside M. pigra roots; Glomerales are considered as generalist AMF (Davison et al. 2011). Consistently with results presented here, AMF spores extracted from the rhizosphere soil of colonized native and exotic Fabaceae showed the dominance of Glomerales, but Archaeosporales and Diversisporales were also present (Tibbett et al. 2008). In a recent meta-analysis, Ramírez-Viga et al. (2018) concluded that AMF improve plant performance in wetlands through higher nutrient acquisition, photosynthetic activity, biomass generation, and mitigation of abiotic stress. However, understanding the functionality of AMF in M. pigra plants is a future task.

The Neotropics harbor several freshwater intermittent wetlands. Nearly one-hundred known AMF species have been reported in Mexico (Montaño et al. 2012, Chimal-Sánchez et al. 2016, Fabián et al. 2018), considered a high AMF diversity reservoir linked with plant and ecosystem diversity. The Mesoamerican biodiversity hotspot (Myers et al. 2000), where La Mixtequilla wetland is located, certainly harbors a still unknown diversity of AMF that is threatened by habitat destruction and land-use change.

Acknowledgments

J. Santillán-Manjarrez received a scholarship from CONACyT-Mexico while studying for a master’s degree in science. The authors acknowledge Ó. Cano-Flores, J. A. Viccon-Pale (UAM-Xochimilco), and M. G. Medina-Canales (ENCB-IPN) for help in soil analysis, and advice during plant sampling and DNA sequence analysis, respectively. A. Meléndez-Herrada (UAM-Xochimilco), and D.P. Janos (University of Miami) provided critical comments on an early version of the manuscript. We thank two anonymous reviewers and Editors for their careful reading of the manuscript, comments and suggestions.

Literature cited

APHA-WEF [Water Environmental Federation & American Public Healt Association]. 2005. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. Washington: American Public Health Association. Washington DC, USA. ISBN: 978-0875530475 [ Links ]

Azcón R. 2000. Papel de la simbiosis micorrízica y su interacción con otros microorganismos rizosféricos en el crecimiento vegetal y sostenibilidad agrícola. In: Alarcón A, Ferrera-Cerrato R. Eds. Ecología, fisiología y biotecnología de la micorriza arbuscular. Colegio de Posgraduados, pp. 1-15. ISBN: 9789687462233 [ Links ]

Calderón de Rzedowski G, Rzedowski J. 2001. Flora fanerogámica del Valle de México. Pátzcuaro: Instituto de Ecología, A.C.-Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad. ISBN: 970-9000-17-9 [ Links ]

Cejudo-Espinosa E, Ramos-Valdivia AC, Esparza-García F, Moreno-Casasola P, Rodriguez-Vazquez R. 2009. Short-term accumulation of atrazine by three plants from a wetland model system. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 56: 201-208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-008-9193-7 [ Links ]

Chimal-Sánchez E, Montaño NM, Camargo-Ricalde SL, García-Sánchez R, Hernández-Cuevas LV. 2016. Nuevos registros de hongos micorrizógenos arbusculares para México. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 87: 242-247. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmb.2016.01.024 [ Links ]

Davison J, Öpik M, Daniell TJ, Moora M, Zobel M. 2011. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities in plant roots are not random assemblages. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 78: 103-115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2011.01103.x [ Links ]

De Marins JF, Carrenho R, Thomaz SM. 2009. Occurrence and coexistence of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and dark septate fungi in aquatic macrophytes in a tropical river-floodplain system. Aquatic Botany 91: 13-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquabot.2009.01.001 [ Links ]

Della Monica IF, Saparrat MCN, Godeas AM, Scervino JM. 2015. The co-existence between DSE and AMF symbionts affects plant P pools through P mineralization and solubilization processes. Fungal Ecology 17: 10-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funeco.2015.04.004 [ Links ]

Dickson S, Smith FA, Smith SE. 2007. Structural differences in arbuscular mycorrhizal symbioses: more than 100 years after Gallaud, where next? Mycorrhiza 17: 375-393. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-007-0130-9 [ Links ]

Driessen P, Deckers J, Spaargaren O, Nachtergaele F. (eds). 2001. Lecture notes on the major soils of the world. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). ISBN: 925-104637-9 [ Links ]

Edgar RC. 2004. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Research 32: 1792-1797. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkh340 [ Links ]

Fabián D, Guadarrama P, Hernandez-Cuevas L, Ramos-Zapata JA. 2018. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in a coastal wetland in Yucatan, Mexico. Botanical Sciences 96: 24-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17129/botsci.1216 [ Links ]

Fuchs B, Haselwandter K. 2004. Red list plants: colonization by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and dark septate endophytes. Mycorrhiza 14: 277-281. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-004-0314-5 [ Links ]

Fumanal B, Plenchette C, Chauvel B, Bretagnolle F. 2006. Which role can arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi play in the facilitation of Ambrosia artemisiifolia L. invasion in France? Mycorrhiza 17: 25-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-006-0078-1 [ Links ]

García I, Mendoza R, Pomar MC. 2012. Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis and dark septate endophytes under contrasting grazing modes in the Magellanic steppe of Tierra del Fuego. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 155: 194-201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2012.04.020 [ Links ]

Gee GW, Bauder JW. 1986. Particle-size analysis. In: Klute A. Ed. Methods of soil analysis, Part 1: Physical and mineralogical methods. Madison: American Society of Agronomy, 383-412. ISBN: 978-0891188117 DOI: https://doi.org/doi:10.2136/sssabookser5.1.2ed.c15 [ Links ]

Gutknecht JLM, Goodman RM, Balser TC. 2006. Linking soil process and microbial ecology in freshwater wetland ecosystems. Plant and Soil 289: 17-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-006-9105-4 [ Links ]

Heredia-Acuña C, Alarcón A, Hernández-Cuevas LV, Ferrera-Cerrato R, Almaraz-Suárez JJ. 2014. Diversidad, ecología e importancia potencial de hongos endófitos septados obscuros en México. Botanical Sciences 92: 321-333. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17129/botsci.114 [ Links ]

Jackson ML. 1982. Análisis químico de suelos. Barcelona: Omega. ISBN: 84-282-0261-3 [ Links ]

James EK, Loureiro MF, Pott A, Pott VJ, Martins CM, Franco AA, Sprent JI. 2001. Flooding-tolerant legume symbioses from the Brazilian Pantanal. New Phytologist 150: 723-738. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2001.00126.x [ Links ]

Jumpponen A, Trappe JM. 1998. Dark septate endophytes: a review of facultative biotrophic root-colonizing fungi. New Phytologist 140: 295-310. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.1998.00265.x [ Links ]

Junk WJ, Bayley PB, Sparks RE. 1989. The flood pulse concept in river-floodplain systems. In: Dodge DP. Ed. Proceedings of the International Large River Symposium. Ottawa: Canadian Special Publication of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 106, Fisheries and Oceans, pp. 110-127. ISBN: 0660132591 [ Links ]

Kimura M. 1980. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. Journal of Molecular Evolution 16: 111-120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01731581 [ Links ]

Kohout P, Sýkorová Z, Ctvrtlíková M, Rydlová J, Suda J, Vohník M, Sudová R. 2012. Surprising spectra of root-associated fungi in submerged aquatic plants. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 80: 216-235. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2011.01291.x [ Links ]

Krüger M, Stockinger H, Krüger C, Schüßler A. 2009. DNA-based species level detection of Glomeromycota: one PCR primer set for all arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytologist 183: 212-223. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02835.x [ Links ]

Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. 2016. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Molecular Biology and Evolution 33: 1870-1874. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msw054 [ Links ]

Kusari S, Hertweck C, Spiteller M. 2012. Chemical ecology of endophytic fungi: origins of secondary metabolites. Chemistry & Biology 19: 792-798. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chembiol.2012.06.004 [ Links ]

Lammel DR, Cruz LM, Mescolotti D, Stürmer SL, Cardoso EJBN. 2015. Woody Mimosa species are nodulated by Burkholderia in ombrophylous forest soils and their symbioses are enhanced by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF). Plant and Soil 393: 123-135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-015-2470-0 [ Links ]

Lonsdale WM. 1993. Rates of spread of an invading species - Mimosa pigra in northern Australia. Journal of Ecology 81: 513-521. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2261529 [ Links ]

López-Ríos GF, Rosas-López UY. 1988. El herbario. Texcoco: Apoyos Académicos 1, Universidad Autónoma de Chapingo. ISBN: 968-884-803-4 [ Links ]

Mandyam KG, Jumpponen A. 2015. Mutualism-parasitism paradigm synthesized from results of root-endophyte models. Frontiers in Microbiology 5: 776. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00776 [ Links ]

Matthews GVT. 2013. The Ramsar Convention on Wetlands: its History and Development. Ramsar Convention Secretariat. ISBN: 2-940073-00-7 [ Links ]

Medina-Roldán E, Arredondo JT, Huber-Sannwald E, Chapa-Vargas L, Olalde-Portugal V. 2008. Grazing effects on fungal root symbionts and carbon and nitrogen storage in a shortgrass steppe in Central Mexico. Journal of Arid Environments 72: 546-556. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2007.07.005 [ Links ]

Montaño NM, Alarcón A, Camargo-Ricalde SL, Hernández-Cuevas LV, Álvarez-Sánchez J, González-Chávez MCA, Gavito ME, Sánchez-Gallen I, Ramos-Zapata J, Guadarrama P, Maldonado-Mendoza IE, Castillo-Argüero S, García-Sánchez R, Trejo D, Ferrera-Cerrato R. 2012. Research on arbuscular mycorrhizae in Mexico: an historical synthesis and future prospects. Symbiosis 57: 111-126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13199-012-0184-0 [ Links ]

Moreno-Casasola P, López Rosas H, Infante Mata D, Peralta LA, Travieso-Bello AC, Warner BG. 2009. Environmental and anthropogenic factors associated with coastal wetland differentiation in La Mancha, Veracruz, Mexico. Plant Ecology 200: 37-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-008-9400-7 [ Links ]

Muthukumar T, Udaiyan K. 2002. Seasonality of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae in sedges in a semi-arid tropical grassland. Acta Oecologica 23: 337-347. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1146-609X(02)01165-7 [ Links ]

Muthukumar T, Udaiyan K, Karthikeyan A, Manian S. 1997. Influence of native endomycorrhiza, soil flooding and nurse plant on mycorrhizal status and growth of purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus L.). Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 61: 51-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(96)01073-0 [ Links ]

Muthukumar T, Udaiyan K, Shanmughavel P. 2004. Mycorrhiza in sedges-an overview. Mycorrhiza 14: 65-77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-004-0296-3 [ Links ]

Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, da Fonseca GAB, Kent J. 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403: 853-858. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/35002501 [ Links ]

Newsham KK. 2011. A meta-analysis of plant responses to dark septate root endophytes. New Phytologist 190: 783-793. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03611.x [ Links ]

Oehl F, Alves da Silva G, Goto BT, Costa-Maia L, Sieverding E. 2011. Glomeromycota: two new classes and a new order. Mycotaxon 116: 365-379. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5248/116.365 [ Links ]

Olivares E, Vizcaíno D, Gamboa A. 2002. Mineral nutrition of three aquatic emergent macrophytes in a managed wetland in Venezuela. Journal of Plant Nutrition 25: 475-496. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1081/PLN-120003377 [ Links ]

Öpik M, Vanatoa A, Vanatoa E, Moora M, Davison J, Kalwij JM, Reier Ü, Zobel M. 2010. The online database MaarjAM reveals global and ecosystemic distribution patterns in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (Glomeromycota). New Phytologist 188: 223-241. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03334.x [ Links ]

Parker MA, Wurtz AK, Paynter Q. 2007. Nodule symbiosis of invasive Mimosa pigra in Australia and in ancestral habitats: a comparative analysis. Biological Invasions 9: 127-138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-006-0009-2 [ Links ]

Parniske M. 2008. Arbuscular mycorrhiza: the mother of plant root endosymbioses. Nature Reviews Microbiology 6: 763-775. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro1987 [ Links ]

Phillips JM, Hayman DS. 1970. Improved procedures for clearing roots and staining parasitic and vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for rapid assessment of infection. Transactions of the British Mycological Society 55: 158-161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-1536(70)80110-3 [ Links ]

Ramírez-Viga TK, Aguilar R, Castillo-Argüero S, Chiappa-Carrara X, Guadarrama P, Ramos-Zapata J. 2018. Wetland plant species improve performance when inoculated with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: a meta-analysis of experimental pot studies. Mycorrhiza 28: 477-493. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-018-0839-7 [ Links ]

Ramsar Convention Secretariat. 2010. Wetland inventory: a Ramsar framework for wetland inventory and ecological character description. Ramsar handbooks for the wise use of wetlands, 4th edition, vol. 15. Gland: Ramsar Convention Secretariat Bureau. [ Links ]

Rivera-Becerril F, Signoret-Poillon M, Ayala-Zermeño MA, Castilla-Hernández P, García-Mena J, Mier T, Núñez-Cardona MT, Romero-Martínez N, Sánchez-Santillán N, Torres-Corona NC, Viccon-Pale JA. 2008. Algunos aspectos ambientales y biológicos de dos potreros inundables de la Mixtequilla. ContactoS 70: 31-39. [ Links ]

Ruotsalainen AL, Väre H, Vestberg M. 2002. Seasonality of root fungal colonization in low-alpine herbs. Mycorrhiza 12: 29-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-001-0145-6 [ Links ]

Rzedowski J. 1986. Vegetación de México. México DF: Limusa. ISBN: 968-18-0002-8 [ Links ]

Sarukhán J, Urquiza-Haas T, Koleff P, Carabias J, Dirzo R, Ezcurra E, Cerdeira-Estrada S, Soberón J. 2015. Strategic actions to value, conserve, and restore the natural capital of megadiversity countries: the case of Mexico. BioScience 65: 164-173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biu195 [ Links ]

Smith SE, Read DJ. 2008. Mycorrhizal symbiosis. London: Academic Press and Elsevier. ISBN: 9780123705266 [ Links ]

Spatafora JW, Chang Y, Benny GL, Lazarus K, Smith ME, Berbee ML, Bonito G, Corradi N, Grigoriev I, Gryganskyi A, James TY, O’Donnell K, Roberson RW, Taylor TN, Uehling J, Vilgalys R, White MM, Stajich JE. 2016. A phylum-level phylogenetic classification of zygomycete fungi based on genome-scale data. Mycologia 108: 1028-1046. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3852/16-042 [ Links ]

Sraj-Krzic N, Pongrac P, Klemenc M, Kladnik A, Regvar M, Gaberscik A. 2006. Mycorrhizal colonisation in plants from intermittent aquatic habitats. Aquatic Botany 85: 331-336. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquabot.2006.07.001 [ Links ]

Stork NE, Habel JC. 2014. Can biodiversity hotspots protect more than tropical forest plants and vertebrates? Journal of Biogeography 41: 421-428. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.12223 [ Links ]

Sudová R, Rydlová J, Ctvrtlíková M, Havránek P, Adamec L. 2011. The incidence of arbuscular mycorrhiza in two submerged Isoëtes species. Aquatic Botany 94: 183-187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquabot.2011.02.003 [ Links ]

Thomaz SM, Mormul RP, Michelan TS. 2015. Propagule pressure, invasilibity of freshwater ecosystems by macrophytes and their ecological impacts: a review of tropical freswater ecosystems. Hydrobiologia 746: 39-59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-014-2044-9 [ Links ]

Tibbett M, Ryan MH, Barker SJ, Chen Y, Denton MD, Edmonds-Tibbett T, Walker C. 2008. The diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizas of selected Australian Fabaceae. Plant Biosystems 142: 420-427. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/11263500802151124 [ Links ]

Trouvelot A, Kough JL, Gianinazzi-Pearson V. 1986. Measure du taux de mycorhisation VA d’un systeme radiculaire. Recherche de méthodes d’estimation ayant une signification fonctionelle. In: Gianinazzi-Pearson V, Gianinazzi S. eds. Mycorrhizae: physiology and genetics. Paris: INRA Press, pp. 217-221. [ Links ]

USDA [United States Department of Agriculture]. 2004. Soil survey laboratory methods manual. Lincoln: Soil Survey Investigations Report No 42, version 4.0. Burt R ed. U.S Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. [ Links ]

USDA. 2011. Soil survey laboratory information manual. Lincoln: Soil Survey Investigations Report No. 45, version 2.0, Soil Survey Staff. Burt R. ed. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. [ Links ]

Vandenkoornhuyse P, Baldauf SL, Leyval C, Straczek J, Young PJW. 2002. Extensive fungal diversity in plant roots. Science 295: 2051. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.295.5562.2051 [ Links ]

van der Valk AG. 2012. The biology of freshwater wetlands. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN: 9780199608942 [ Links ]

Viccon-Pale JA, Ortega P, Mendoza-Vargas L, Castilla-Hernández P, López-Cuevas A, Meléndez-Herrada A, Rivera-Becerril F, Vela-Correa G, Signoret-Poillon M. 2016. Structure and population dynamics of the secondary burrower crayfish Procambarus acanthophorus from a tropical Mexican wetland. Canadian Journal of Zoology 94: 479-488. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/cjz-2015-0181 [ Links ]

Waterhouse AM, Procter JB, Martin DMA, Clamp M, Barton GJ. 2009. Jalview Version 2-a multiple sequence alignment editor and analysis workbench. Bioinformatics 25 : 1189-1191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp033 [ Links ]

Weishampel PA, Bedford BL. 2006. Wetland dicots and monocots differ in colonization by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and dark septate endophytes. Mycorrhiza 16: 495-502. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-006-0064-7 [ Links ]

Zhu X-C, Song F-B, Liu S-Q, Liu TD. 2011. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus on photosynthesis and water status of maize under high temperature stress. Plant and Soil 346: 189-199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-011-0809-8 [ Links ]

1Associated editor: Alejandro Zavala Hurtado

Received: February 22, 2019; Accepted: July 16, 2019

* Corresponding author: Facundo Rivera-Becerril, e-mail: frivera@correo.xoc.uam.mx.

Author Contributions: JSM and APSH designed, set up the experiment and analyzed the data. PCH analyzed the data and helped to write the paper. IEMM and DvT were involved on molecular and bioinformatic analysis. GVC participated in soil analysis; ACH and CHD identified the plant species. MSP gave advice during the field work. FRB designed the experiment, analyzed the data and wrote the paper.

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License