SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.97 número2Enraizamiento ex vitro y establecimiento de un sistema eficiente de inducción de brotes adventicios en Vaccinium corymbosum (Ericaceae)Liberación de oxígeno radial por las raíces de las plantas nativas de humedales tropicales costeros de Veracruz en respuesta a diferentes condiciones de inundación índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Botanical Sciences

versión On-line ISSN 2007-4476versión impresa ISSN 2007-4298

Bot. sci vol.97 no.2 México abr./jun. 2019

https://doi.org/10.17129/botsci.2100 

Physiology

Hemiparasitic interaction between Castilleja tenuiflora (Orobanchaceae) and Baccharis conferta (Asteraceae): haustorium anatomy and C- and N-fluxes

Interacción hemiparásita entre Castilleja tenuiflora (Orobanchaceae) y Baccharis conferta (Asteraceae): anatomía del haustorio y flujo de C y N

Edith Montes-Hernández1  3 

Estela Sandoval-Zapotitla2 

Kalina Bermúdez-Torres1 

José Luis Trejo-Espino1 

Gabriela Trejo-Tapia1  * 

1 Departamento de Biotecnología, Centro de Desarrollo de Productos Bióticos, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Yautepec, Morelos, México.

2 Laboratorio de Anatomía Vegetal, Jardín Botánico, Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Coyoacán, Ciudad de México, México.

3 Departamento de Ingeniería Ambiental, Tecnológico de Estudios Superiores de Ixtapaluca, Ixtapaluca, Estado de México, México.


Abstract:

Background:

Castilleja tenuiflora is a hemiparasite of Baccharis conferta. The haustorium is the characteristic structure of hemiparasitic plants and its anatomy varies depending several factors such as host species, position on the root and environment.

Question:

What is the structure and anatomy of haustoria builded in field interaction? Based on C, N and chlorophyll contents, is C. tenuiflora a facultative hemiparasite of B. conferta?

Species studied:

Castilleja tenuiflora Benth. and Baccharis conferta Kunth.

Study site and dates:

Plant materials were collected in the Iztaccihuatl-Popocatepetl National Park (N 19° 0.5´ 9.6'', W 98° 40´ 24.2'', 3,480 m.a.s.l.), State of Mexico, Mexico, in December 2013.

Methods:

Individuals of B. conferta and C. tenuiflora growing independently or in hemiparasite interactions were collected and samples were processed for anatomical and histochemical characterization, determination of C, N and chlorophyll.

Results:

Haustoria were globular and located mainly in the lateral roots of B. conferta. Anatomy of haustorium shows the characteristic structures: exophyte and endophyte. Haustorial tissues storage starch, tannins and essential oils while in the B. conferta roots also calcium oxalate crystals were found. C levels were significantly influenced by hemiparasitic interaction. This is the first study that characterizes a hemiparasitic interaction in the field and specifically between C. tenuiflora and B. conferta.

Conclusions:

Haustoria builded in interaction with B. conferta show the characteristic structure and anatomy. Hemiparasitic relationship represents for C. tenuiflora a source of C and other compounds such as essential oils.

Key words: Endophyte; essential oils; haustorium; hemiparasitism; parasitic plants

Resumen:

Antecedentes:

Castilleja tenuiflora es una hemiparásita de Baccharis conferta. El haustorio es característico de las plantas hemiparasíticas y su anatomía varía según varios factores, como la especie hospedadora, la posición en la raíz y el ambiente.

Hipótesis:

¿Cuál es la estructura y anatomía de los haustorios en la interacción C. tenuiflora - B. conferta? Según el contenido de C, N y clorofila, ¿Es C. tenuiflora una hemiparasita facultativa de B. conferta?

Especies de estudio:

Castilleja tenuiflora Benth. y Baccharis conferta Kunth.

Sitio de estudio y fechas:

Los materiales vegetales se recolectaron en el Parque Nacional Iztaccíhuatl-Popocatépetl (N 19 ° 0.5' 9.6 '', O 98 ° 40' 24.2 '', 3,480 msnm), Estado de México, México, en diciembre de 2013.

Métodos:

Se recolectaron plantas que crecen independientes o en interacción hemiparásita. Se realizó una caracterización anatómica e histoquímica y se determinó el contenido de C, N y clorofila.

Resultados:

Los haustorios se localizaron en las raíces laterales del hospedero. Fueron globulares y presentaron las estructuras características: exófito y endófito; almacenan almidón, taninos y aceites esenciales. Las raíces del hospedero acumularon cristales de oxalato de calcio. Los niveles de C se vieron influenciados significativamente por la interacción hemiparásita. Este es el primer estudio que caracteriza una interacción hemiparasítica en campo y específicamente entre C. tenuiflora y B. conferta.

Conclusiones:

Los haustorios de C. tenuiflora muestran la estructura y anatomía característica. La relación hemiparasítica representa una fuente de C y aceites esenciales para C. tenuiflora.

Palabras clave: Aceites esenciales; endófito; haustorio; hemiparasitismo; plantas parásitas

The relationship between a parasitic plant and its host involves a physical attachment aboveground (shoot-to-shoot) or belowground (root-to-root), which requires a unique organ, haustorium, developed by parasitic plants. This multifunctional organ attaches to the host and establishes a phloem (holoparasites) or xylem (hemiparasites) continuum to permit exchanges of water, nutrients, hormones, proteins and nucleotides (Kim & Westwood 2015, Furuhashi et al. 2016). Characteristic for the facultative hemiparasitic plants are the lateral haustoria (Westwood et al. 2010), swollen rounded structures attached to the host surface (Estabrook & Yoder 1998) with a complex internal structure consisting of three main regions: the haustorial neck (upper haustorium or exophyte), the endophyte and the base of the haustorium (Joel 2013). Because the haustorium is the key feature of parasitic angiosperms, its study aids in understanding parasitism. Through this vascular connection, parasites obtain carbon (C) and nitrogen (N), as well as other molecules from their hosts (Marvier 1996). Root hemiparasites are able to fix some or their total C through photosynthesis, and thus they are primarily parasitic for N (Westwood 2013). Facultative parasites obtain between 10 and 60 % of their C requirement from their hosts, depending on factors such as parasite growth stage, host species and the environmental availability of resources for hosts and parasites (Yoder et al. 2009, Westwood 2013). For instance, Rhinanthus minor L. and Euphrasia rostkoviana Hayne (Orobanchaceae) substract substantial amounts (ca. 25 to 50 %) of organic carbon from hosts such as maize and wheat (Testitel et al. 2010a). Similarly, chlorophyll contents in Thesium chinense Turcz. (Santalaceae) grown with Imperata clyndrica (L.) Raeusch. (Poaceae) or Gnaphlium affine (Asteraceae) were up to 3-fold higher than that grown without host. Moreover, differences in chl a/chl b were attributed to the host species (Luo & Guo 2010). The acquisition of fixed N from another plant is perhaps the greatest benefit of parasitization for hemiparasites. By tapping into a host, the parasite gains access to an expanded root system and a direct supply of fixed inorganic N (Westwood 2013). Facultative hemiparasites can absorb mineral N from soil using their own roots. Nevertheless, haustoria provide a significant supplement: Rhinanthus minor acquires 17 % of its N from the xylem of its grass host Cynosurus cristatus L. (Poaceae) (Cameron & Seel 2007). Using transgenic tomato plants expressing green fluorescent protein (GPF) it was demonstrated bi-directional long-distance movement of proteins between the parasitic weed Philipanche and its host (Aly et al. 2011). Thesium chinense grown with I. cylindrica or Prunella vulgaris L. (Lamiaceae) had higher levels of minerals such as K, P and Cu (Luo & Guo 2010).

Castilleja tenuiflora Benth. (Orobanchaceae) is a root hemiparasitic plant of medicinal value (Sanchez et al. 2013; Herrera-Ruiz et al. 2015). Our group described the formation of haustoria under field conditions without host attachment (Montes-Hernández et al. 2015). Baccharis conferta Kunth (Asteraceae) is a shrub described as a host of C. tenuiflora (Montes-Hernández et al. 2015). Here, we describe the anatomy and histochemistry of the host-parasitic interactions between B. conferta and C. tenuiflora, and the resulting changes in C-, N- and chlorophyll levels. This is the first study that characterizes a hemiparasitic interaction in the field and specifically between C. tenuiflora and B. conferta.

Materials and methods

Plant materials. Plant materials were collected in the Iztaccíhuatl-Popocatépetl National Park (N 19° 0.5´ 9.6'', W 98° 40´ 24.2'', 3,480 masl.), State of Mexico, Mexico, in December 2013. The study site presents high annual precipitation between 800 and 1,200 mm with annual average temperature of 14.3 ºC; the area has a sandy loam soil with predominant vegetation of pine-oak forest and grasslands. Some of the plant species found are: Bidens triplinervia Kunth, Abies religiosa (Kunth) Schltdl. & Cham. (Kunth) Mirb., Trisetum spicatum (L) K. Richt and Lupinus montanus Kunth (Montes-Hernández et al. 2015). Individuals of B. conferta and C. tenuiflora growing independently or in hemiparasite interactions: 1) C. tenuiflora (-H); 2) C. tenuiflora parasitizing B. conferta (+H); 3) B. conferta (-P) and 4) B. conferta parasitized by C. tenuiflora (+P) were randomly collected within an area of 10 × 10 m; plants were in vegetative state and similar in size (Table 1). Plants were identified as Baccharis conferta Kunth and Castilleja tenuiflora Benth. by specialists of the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), associated at MEXU. Vouchers have been deposited in FCME (150228, B. conferta) and MEXU (13234, C. tenuiflora). For the anatomical and histochemical studies, C. tenuiflora haustoria attached to roots of B. conferta and roots of B. conferta were collected from 10 individuals. Fully extended young leaves of 2 to 3 cm in length localized in the upper part of the branches were collected from 10 individuals of both species to analyze C, N and chlorophyll contents. To determine the C and N levels, leaves were dried at room temperature, ground and sifted through a 4-mm sieve. Powder was stored at room temperature until use. For chlorophyll determination, leaves were fixed in the field with liquid nitrogen to prevent chlorophyll degradation.

Table 1 Mean values for growth characteristics of C. tenuiflora and B. conferta growing alone and in interaction conditions 

Growth characteristic Castilleja tenuiflora Baccharis conferta
-H +H Significance (F) -P +P Significance (F)
Plant height (cm) 62.60 ± 10.89 65.90 ± 13.51 0.361 ns 112.1 ± 24.46 95.60 ± 22.32 2.481 ns
Carbon (µg/g DM) 183 ± 22.63 296 ± 16.46 163.009 * 142 ± 18.73 118 ± 14.75 10.125 *
Nitrogen (µg/g DM) 14.66 ± 5.76 19.32 ± 6.97 2.652 ns 12.79 ± 1.05 14.01 ± 1.93 3.073 ns
C: N ratio 12.48 15.32 10.14 9.22
Total Chlorophyll (μg/mg FM) 9.08 ± 2.56 11. 01 ± 3.34 2.109 ns 8.84 ± 2.33 9.55 ± 3.55 0.269 ns
Chl a/Chl b 2.25 ± 0.14 2.24 ± 0.13 0.06 ns 2.25 ± 0.19 2.26 ± 0.18 0.041 ns

Values are means ± standard deviation, n = 10. df = 19. * Indicates significant difference between the groups according to the comparison test of Tukey (P < 0.05), ns indicates not significant

-H: C. tenuiflora; +H: C. tenuiflora parasitizing B. conferta; -P: B. conferta; +P: B. conferta parasitized by C. tenuiflora

Anatomical and histochemical characterization. C. tenuiflora haustoria attached to roots of B. conferta were fixed in FAA (10 ml 4 % formaldehyde, 50 ml 96 % alcohol, 35 ml distilled water and 5 ml glacial acetic acid) for 24 h and dehydrated sequentially in butyl alcohol solutions over 24 h at different (30, 50, 60, 70, 85, 95, and 100 %) concentrations. Subsequently, haustoria were dried to the critical point in an EMITEC K850 dryer and were covered with gold in a coater, QUORUM Q150R-ES. Samples were observed on a Hitachi Model SU1510 scanning electron microscope. This microscope was used to observe the surface characteristics of the haustoria.

To observe the morphology of C. tenuiflora haustoria and B. conferta roots the samples were fixed as described before (Montes-Hernández et al. 2015) and then observed and photographed under a confocal stereomicroscope (LEICA model Z16 AP0A) with camera (KL 1500 LCD).

Haustoria were processed in the same way as described by Montes-Hernández et al. (2015). To observe nuclear structures, lignified, suberized and cutinized walls, samples were stained with safranin O, which produces a red color; fast green was used to visualize cytoplasmatic structures and cellulosic walls (Sandoval et al. 2005). For starch determination, sections were immersed in Lugol’s iodine and condensed tannins were stained with acidic vanillin. After deparaffinization, samples were treated with ruthenium red and essential oils showed a red coloration. In all cases, the stained samples were observed under a Zeiss Axioskop photomicroscope in bright field, phase contrast and polarization, and digitally photographed (Sandoval et al. 2005).

C and N determinations. For the determination of C and N levels, 0.5 g of powdered leaves were used. The C content was determined by the calcination method and the N content was determined by the semi-micro Kjeldahl method. The results are expressed in µg per g biomass dry matter (DM).

Chlorophyll determination. The total chlorophyll concentration was determined by the method proposed by Lichtenthaler (1987) with some modifications. Briefly, 15 mg of fresh tissue was manually crushed in a porcelain mortar to a fine powder. The powder was mixed with 1 ml of acetone 80 % (v/v), gently shaken and allowed to stand for 30 min. Subsequently, it was centrifuged at 16,060 ×g (Heraeus®, Biofuge fresco) for 10 min at 10 °C, and the supernatant was recovered. The total chlorophyll concentration was determined by measuring the absorbance of the supernatant in a UV/VIS spectrophotometer (UV 160-A, Shimadzu, Japan) at 663.2 and 646.8 nm and calculated by the following equations:

Chlorophylla=12.12×A663.22.79×A646.8 (1)

Chlorophyllb=21.50×A646.85.10×A663.2 (2)

Total chlorophyll=chlorophylla+chlorophyllb (3)

where A663.2 represents the absorbance reading at 663.2 nm and A646.8 represents the absorbance reading at 646.8 nm, and the chlorophyll concentration was expressed in µg per mg fresh matter (FM).

Statistical analysis. C, N and chlorophyll data were analyzed using a one-way ANOVA (growing independently or in hemiparasitic interaction) to determine the significance of the data. Comparisons between means within each species were determined using Tukey’s test with a significance level of 5 %. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics v 24 (IBM Corp).

Results

Anatomical and histochemical characterization of haustoria. Haustoria of C. tenuiflora were attached to both the main and lateral roots of B. conferta; however, the proportion of lateral roots having haustoria was higher (80 %) than the proportion of main roots parasitized by these structures (40 %). Usually five to seven haustoria surrounded the lateral root of B. conferta, while the main root was surrounded by one to three haustoria.

Haustoria were globular, with an approximate diameter of 0.5 to 1 mm, and presented haustorial hairs (Figures 1A, 1B). The haustoria had two clear regions the exophyte and endophyte, and the connection between B. conferta roots and C. tenuiflora haustoria was evident (Figure 1C).

Figure 1 Morphology of haustoria of C. tenuiflora (HCt) attached to the root of B. conferta (RBc). A Confocal stereomicroscopic view of globular HCt. B Scanning electron microscopic view of HCt showing haustorial hairs (hh). C Light microscopic view of a section of HCt showing the exophyte (Exo) and endophyte (End). Scale bar = 0.5 cm (A), 1.0 cm (B), 100 µm (C). 

The exophyte comprised dermal, fundamental, and vascular tissues of hemiparasitic C. tenuiflora (Figure 2A). The dermal tissue had an epidermis with four to five layers of thin-walled and flattened parenchymal cells, which stored essential oils, stained in red (Figure 2B), and starch appeared as white spots in phase constrast views (Figure 2C). The fundamental tissue or hyaline body (cortex) consisted of thin-walled, isodiametric and cellulosic parenchymal cells. The parenchymal cells stored starch (Figures 2D, 2E). The vascular tissue, which is observed dark when stained with lugol, was located in the center of the haustorium and was surrounded by cells from the hyaline body. This tissue was comprised solely of xylem (Figure 2F) characterized by vessel elements with alternate edged pits (Figure 2G) and helical thickening tracheids (Figure 2I).

Figure 2 Anatomical arrangement of C. tenuiflora haustoria attached to the root of B. conferta (RBc). A Section showing the endophyte (End) and that the exophyte is comprised by dermal (DT), fundamental (FT) and vascular tissues (VT). B, C Phase contrast view of haustorium dermal tissue showing storage of essential oils (EO) and granules of starch (St). D Phase contrast view of fundamental tissue showing starch (St) storage. E Light microscopic view of fundamental tissue showing starch storage after lugol reaction. F Light microscopic view of haustorium vascular tissue stained in red surrounded by hyaline body stained in green. G Phase contrast view of alternate edged pits comprising xylem of the haustorium. H Phase contrast view of the tracheids found in the xylem of the haustorium. Scale bar = 300 µm (A), 5 µm (B, C, D, F), 0.5 µm (E), 7 µm (G, H). 

The endophyte was located inside the root of B. conferta and consisted of parenchyma cells, vascular tissue and a meristematic zone. The parenchymal cells were thin-walled, isodiametric and cellulosic. The vascular tissue was characterized by xylem connected to the vascular tissue of the root of B. conferta root (Figure 3A). A zone of endophytic growth and development, characterized by the presence of large numbers of nuclei and a meristematic tissue, was observed (Figure 3B). All of the differentiation stages from newly formed to mature vessel elements (Figure 3C) of the alternate-pit type were found attached to the root xylem of B. conferta (Figure 3D). Parenchymal cells presented condensed tannins, observed in brown when they were stained with vanillin (Figure 3E), and starch (Figure 3F).

Figure 3 Haustorium endophyte of C. tenuiflora attached to the root of B. conferta. A Xilem of B. conferta (RBc) with xylem haustorium of C. tenuiflora (End) and parenchyma cells (Pc). B Meristematic zone (Mz) with presence of nuclei. C Differentiation of vessel elements (yellow arrows). D Vessel elements with alternate pits (yellow arrow). E Tannins (Tn, yellow arrow). F Starch (yellow arrow). Pc = parenchyma cells; End = Endophyte; RBc = root of B. conferta; Mz = meristematic zone; Nc = nuclei; Ve = vessel elements; Tn = condensed tannins; St = starch. Scale bar = 32 µm (A), 5 µm (B - F). 

Anatomy and histochemistry of B. conferta root. B. conferta roots possessed rhizodermis, cortex, phloem and xylem (Figure 4A). The rhizodermis had at least 10 layers of isodiametric shaped and thickened wall parenchymal cells, some of which were suberized (Figure 4A). The cortex consisted of thin-walled isodiametric parenchymal cells. Phloem cells were elongated, thin-walled and had callose between phloem tubes. Xylem was characterized by vessel elements with thickened alternate-pits and opposite-pits. Both elements had thickened highly lignified walls (red coloration) and simple perforation plates. Alternate-pits were wider and shorter than opposite-pits (Figure 4B).

Figure 4 Root of Baccharis conferta. A Rhizodermis (R), cortex (C), phloem (P) and xylem (X). B Xylem with alternate (Ap) and opposite-pits (Op) and opposing lined pits with xylem radios (yellow arrow). C Phloem with multiseriate rays (yellow arrow). D Phloem with uniseriate (red arrow) and multiseriate rays (yellow arrow). E vacuoles (V). F oxalate crystals (yellow arrow). G Tannins (brown coloration) and starch (black coloration). H Essential oils (yellow arrow). R = rhizodermis; C = cortex; P = phloem; X = xylem; Ap = alternate-pits; Op = opposite-pits; V = vacuoles. Scale bar = 5 µm (A, C, E, F-H), 7 µm (B), 32 µm (D). 

Baccharis conferta roots possessed xylem and phloem rays. These were uniseriate (a single row of cells) and multiseriate (more than one row of cells), and heterogeneous rays had erected and procumbent cells (Figure 4C and 4D). Thin-walled vacuoles near the root phloem in B. conferta were observed (Figure 4E). Other types and styloids of crystals, which were long, thin and sharp in form and composed of calcium oxalate were found (Figure 4F), while parenchymal cell rays stored tannins (brown coloration), starch (black coloration) (Figure 4G) and essentials oils (red coloration) (Figure 4H).

C, N and chlorophyll contents. The C content was significantly (P < 0.05) higher in individuals of C. tenuiflora parasitizing B. conferta (+H: 296 ± 16.46 (µg C/g DM) compared with those without the host (-H: 183 ± 22.63 µg C/g DM) (Table 1), while individuals of B. conferta parasitized by C. tenuiflora showed a lower C content (+P: 118 ± 14.75, µg C/g DM, P < 0.05) compared with those growing without it (-P: 142 ± 18.73, µg C/g DM). N content in individuals of C. tenuiflora (H-: 14.66 ± 5.76 μg N/g DM) was not affected by growing with a host (H+: 19.32 ± 6.97, µg N/g DM) (P > 0.05) (Table 1). The N concentrations in interacting and non-interacting individuals of B. conferta varied between 12.79 ± 1.05 (-P) and 14.01 ± 1.93 (+P) µg N/g DM (P > 0.05). The C:N ratio was higher in C. tenuiflora parasitizing its host than when growing alone. Similarly, the C:N ratio was higher in B. conferta without the hemiparasite (Table 1).

The total chlorophyll concentration in leaves of interacting and non-interacting individuals of C. tenuiflora varied between 11.01 ± 3.34 (+H:) and 9.08 ± 2.56 (-H) μg/mg FM (P > 0.05) (Table 1). Similarly, chlorophyll contents in parasitized and non-parasitized individuals of B. conferta (+P: 9.55 ± 3.55; -P: 8.84 ± 2.33 μg/mg FM) were not significantly different (P > 0.05) (Table 1).

Discussion

Parasitic plants invade host plants through specialized structures, called haustoria, and remove materials such as water, minerals, nutrients, hormones and nucleotides (Yoshida et al. 2016). Two characteristic regions constituted the haustoria of C. tenuiflora parasitizing B. conferta roots: the exophyte and the endophyte, as described for other hemiparasitic plants (Joel 2013). The exophyte is compossed of dermal, fundamental and vascular tissues of the parasitic plant. The main characteristic of the C. tenuiflora haustorial dermal tissue is the presence of starch and essential oils. Starch has been described in other haustoria of Castilleja (Dobbins & Kuijt 1973, Montes-Hernández et al. 2015) as a promotor of the haustorial growth (Qing-Liang et al. 2011). Because essential oils were not previously found in C. tenuiflora haustoria (Montes-Hernández et al. 2015) nor described in haustoria of other hemiparasitic plants, while there are several reports on the presence of essential oils in species of the genus Baccharis (Vannini et al. 2012, Xavier et al. 2013, Perera et al. 2016), we hypothesize that these compounds are traslocated from the host into C. tenuiflora.

The fundamental tissue, known also as the hyaline body, of C. tenuiflora presented similar characteristics to those described for the hemiparasites Pedicularis canadensis L. (Piehl 1963) and Rhinathus minor L. (Rümer et al. 2007). The role of the fundamental tissue in parasitic plants is not completely clear but it may be involved in the storage and translocation of primary and secondary metabolites (Visser et al. 1984). The vascular tissue of C. tenuiflora haustoria consists only of xylem vessel elements and tracheids, which agrees with the observations in other hemiparasites (Piehl 1963; Rümer et al. 2007).

Baccharis conferta roots contain parenchymal rays, xylem and phloem. Rays extend through the vascular root system and facilitate the radial transport of water, substances and gases (Van Bel 1990). The roots of B. conferta store oxalate crystals (mainly styloid), starch, condensed tannins and essential oils. Oxalate crystals are formed in the vacuoles of specialized cells, called crystal idioblasts, and may be involved in the regulation of calcium levels, plant protection and metal detoxification (Nakata 2003). The type, and the presence or absence of crystals are taxonomic characteristics in Asteraceae and other plant families (Kartal-Meric 2016). Oxalate crystals in the shape of styloids have been described before in leaves of Baccharis glaziovvi Baker (Jasinski et al. 2014), Baccharis brevifolia D.C. and Baccharis microdonta D.C. (Bobek et al. 2016). There are no studies reporting the presence of starch in the roots of Baccharis; however, this polysaccharide is used for growth and reproduction (Stitt & Zeeman 2012). Condensed tannins are found in the parenchymal rays of the roots of B. conferta. Tannins are abundant in the leaves of many plants and in vascular tissues, and they have a role in chemical ecology, as protectors against herbivorous insects (Salminen & Karonen 2011) and as allelopathics (Furlan et al. 2011). These phenolic compounds also confer structural rigidity to the plant, as well as providing protection against dehydration and decomposition (Espírito-Santo et al. 1999). Essential oils have been widely reported in leaves of this genus (Lago et al. 2008, Vannini et al. 2012). The chemical characterization of B. conferta is under further investigation.

C, N and chlorophyll contents increase when C. tenuiflora is associated with B. conferta. Thus, haustoria effectively acquire not only water and minerals but also C and N. Hemiparasitic plants have a double strategy for resource acquisition. They combine their own photosynthetic activities with the parasitism of other species with a host-to-hemiparasite flux of organic C (Tesitel et al. 2010b). In our study, C increases by 40 % in C. tenuifora individuals parasitizing B. conferta and decreases by 32 % in B. conferta individuals parasitized by C. tenuiflora. Hemiparasitic plants are green and perform photosynthesis; however, at the same time, they attack the vascular system of other species and exploit the host’s xylem sap, which contains water, mineral nutrients and organic C (Irving & Cameron 2009). Despite the low organic C concentration in xylem, the extensive amount of solutes acquired from the host can also result in significant heterotrophic C gains (Tesitel et al. 2010a), which has been observed not only in Rhinanthus but also in numerous representatives of other root-hemiparasitic species, including Euphrasia (Tesitel et al. 2010a), Striga (Press et al. 1987) and Olax (Tennakoon & Pate 1996). The acquired C from host xylem sap may come from C attached to N-based solutes, amino acids, and organic acids (Marshall & Ehleringer 1990). The acquisition of C and N (and other nutrients) may also be linked and regulated by the parasites’ rate of photosynthesis (Tesitel et al. 2015). The actual product acquired from the host (xylem sap) does not contain large amounts of C to begin with, therefore C assimilation allows for the further growth of the parasitic plant, as evidenced by an increase in leaf area, delay in leaf senescence and increase in RUBISCO activity (Watling & Press 1997). However, C acquisition depends on many factors, such as the development stage of the parasitic plant, the host species and environmental conditions (Tesitel et al. 2011). C acquisition is difficult to follow, owing to its rapid metabolization in the parasitic plant into other compounds, such as hexoses, mannitol and starch (Westwood 2013).

The acquisition of N in associated parasitic plants has been reported, and research has focused specifically on understanding the effects of N on parasitic plants. Cechin & Press (1993) reported an increase in the N concentrations in leaves of Striga hermonthica (Delile) Benth., associated with Sorghum sp., compared with leaves of non-associated S. hermonthica. Furthermore, it was observed that the rate of photosynthesis of S. hermonthica increases with N concentration augmentation, owing to increase in chlorophyll and RUBISCO activity (Cechin & Press 1993). These data are consistent with the results obtained in this work, in which the concentrations of N (17 %) and chlorophyll increased slightly in leaves of C. tenuiflora growing in hemiparasitic relationships with B. conferta (no significant difference). Thus, it was hypothesized that the increase in the N and chlorophyll contents may have significant effects on the rate of photosynthesis in C. tenuiflora. Studies on different species of parasitic plants (Bartsia trixago L., R. minor, S. hermonthica and Thesium chinense Turez) indicate that the N content is greater when parasites interact with their hosts, and that a high content N content is reflected in the increase in the aboveground biomass, photosynthesis rate and chlorophyll content. Additionaly, it is also reflected in higher growth and reproduction rates for the hemiparasites (Luo & Guo 2010).

Acknowledgments

This research was financed by the Secretaría de Investigación y Posgrado del Instituto Politécnico Nacional (grants 1623-20150389) and by the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACyT-México) (Grant CB-2013-01-220007). EMH is indebted to CONACyT for an awarded fellowship and to the Programa Institucional de Formación de Investigadores (BEIFI-IPN). We thank MSc. María Berenit Mendoza Garfías for adquisiton of photos in scanning electron microscope, Dr. José Victor Tamariz Flores for the determination of C and N and Lesley Benyon, PhD, from Edanz Group (http://www.edanzediting.com/ac) for editing a draft of this manuscript.

Literature cited

Aly R, Hamamouch N, Abu-Nassar J, Wolf S, Joel DM, Eizenberg H, Kaisler E, Cramer C, Gal-On A, Westwood JH. 2011. Movement of protein and macromolecules between host plants and the parasitic weed Phelipanche aegyptiaca Pers. Plant Cell Reports 30: 2233-2241. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-011-1128-5 [ Links ]

Bobek VB, Heiden G, de Oliveira CF, de Almeida VP, de Paula JP, Farago PV, Nakashima T, Manfron-Budel JM. 2016. Comparative analytical micrographs of “vassouras” (Baccharis, Asteraceae). Brazilian Journal of Pharmacognosy 26: 665-672. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjp.2016.05.001 [ Links ]

Cameron DD, Seel WE. 2007. Functional anatomy of haustoria formed by Rhinanthus minor: linking evidence from histology and isotope tracing. New Phytologist 174: 412-419. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02013.x [ Links ]

Cechin I, Press MC. 1993. Nitrogen relations of the sorghum-Striga hermonthica host-parasite association: germination, attachment and early growth. New Phytologist 124: 681-687. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1993.tb03858.x [ Links ]

Dobbins DR, Kuijt J. 1973. Studies on haustorium of Castilleja (Scrophulariaceae). 1. Upper haustorium. Canadian Journal of Botany 51: 917-922. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/b73-114 [ Links ]

Espírito-Santo M, Fernandes GW, Allain L, Reis T. 1999. Tannins in Baccharis dracunculifolia (Asteraceae): effects of seasonality, water availability and plant sex. Acta Botanica Brasilica 13: 167-174. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-33061999000200006 [ Links ]

Estabrook E, Yoder JI. 1998. Plant-Plant communications: Rhizosphere signaling between parasitic angiosperms and their hosts. Plant Physiology 116: 1-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.116.1.1 [ Links ]

Furlan CM, Barbosa L, Alves DY. 2011. Tannins: what do they represent in plant life? In: Petridis GK (ed) Tannins: Types, Foods Containing and Nutrition. New York: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.251-263. ISBN-13: 978-1617611278 [ Links ]

Furuhashi T, Nakamura T, Iwase K. 2016. Analysis of metabolites in stem parasitic plant interactions: Interaction of Cuscuta-Momordica versus Cassytha-Ipomoea. Plants 5: 43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/plants5040043 [ Links ]

Herrera-Ruiz M, López-Rodríguez R, Trejo-Tapia G, Domínguez-Mendoza B, González-Cortazar M, Tortoriello J, Zamilpa A. 2015. A new furofuran lignan diglycoside and other secondary metabolites from the antidepressant extract of Castilleja tenuiflora Benth. Molecules 20: 13127-13143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules200713127 [ Links ]

Irving LJ, Cameron DD. 2009 You are what you eat: Interactions between root parasitic plants and their hosts. In: Jean-Claude K, Michel D (eds) Advances in Botanical Research. Academic Press, 87-138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2296(08)00803-3 [ Links ]

Jasinski VCG, da Silva RZ, Pontarolo R, Budel JM, Campos FR. 2014. Morpho-anatomical characteristics of Baccharis glaziovii in support of its pharmacobotany. Brazilian Journal of Pharmacognosy 24: 609-616. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjp.2014.11.003 [ Links ]

Joel DM. 2013. Functional structure of the mature haustorium. In: Joel DM, Gressel J, Musselman LJ (eds) Parasitic Orobanchaceae. Parasitic mechanisms and control strategies. Spriger-Verlag, London, pp 25-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38146-1_3 [ Links ]

Kartal-Meric C. 2016. Calcium oxalate crystals in some species of the Tribe Cardueae (Asteraceae). Botanical Sciences 94: 107-119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17129/botsci.259 [ Links ]

Kim G, Westwood JH. 2015. Macromolecule exchange in Cuscuta-host plant interactions. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 26: 20-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2015.05.012 [ Links ]

Lago JHG, Romoff P, Fávero OA, Souza FO, Soares MG, Baraldi PT, Corrêa AG. 2008. Chemical composition of male and female Baccharis trimera (Less.) DC. (Asteraceae) essential oils. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 36: 737-740. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bse.2008.05.009 [ Links ]

Lichtenthaler HK. 1987. Chlorophylls and carotenoids: Pigments of photosynthetic biomembranes. In: Lester Packer RD (ed) Methods in Enzymology, vol Volume 148. Academic Press, pp 350-382. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0076-6879(87)48036-1 [ Links ]

Luo FL, Guo QS. 2010. Influences of host species on transpiration, photosynthesis, chlorophyll and mineral contents of medicinal hemiparasite Thesium chinense Turcz. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 32: 1093-1102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-010-0501-2 [ Links ]

Marshall J, Ehleringer J. 1990. Are xylem-tapping mistletoes partially heterotrophie? Oecologia 84: 244-248 [ Links ]

Marvier MA. 1996. Parasitic plant-host interactions: Plant performance and indirect effects on parasite-feeding herbivores. Ecology 77: 1398-1409. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2265537 [ Links ]

Montes-Hernández E, Sandoval-Zapotitla E, Bermúdez-Torres K, Trejo-Tapia G. 2015. Potential hosts of Castilleja tenuiflora (Orobanchaceae) and characterization of its haustoria. Flora 214: 11-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2015.05.003 [ Links ]

Nakata PA. 2003. Advances in our understanding of calcium oxalate crystal formation and function in plants. Plant Science 164: 901-909. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0168-9452(03)00120-1 [ Links ]

Perera WH, Bizzo HR, Gama PE, Alviano CS, Salimena FRG, Alviano DS, Leitão SG. 2016. Essential oil constituents from high altitude Brazilian species with antimicrobial activity: Baccharis parvidentata Malag., Hyptis monticola Mart. ex Benth. and Lippia origanoides Kunth. Journal of Essential Oil Research 29: 109-116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10412905.2016.1210039 [ Links ]

Piehl MA. 1963. Mode of attachment, haustorium structure, and hosts of Pedicularis canadensis. American Journal of Botany 50: 978-985. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2439904 [ Links ]

Press M, Shah N, Touhy J, Stewart G. 1987. Carbono isotope demostrate carbon flux from C4 host to C3 parasite. Plant Physiology 85: 1143-1145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.85.4.1143 [ Links ]

Qing-Liang C, Ya-Min J, Zhi-Fen W, Cheng-Gang S, Jing-Bin Z, Yu-Hai G. 2011. Postembryonic development of Cistanche tubulosa (Schrenk) Whight. Pakistan Journal of Botany 43: 1823-1830 [ Links ]

Rümer S, Cameron DD, Wacker R, Hartung W, Jiang F. 2007. An anatomical study of the haustoria of Rhinanthus minor attached to roots of different hosts. Flora 202: 194-200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2006.07.002 [ Links ]

Salminen JP, Karonen M. 2011. Chemical ecology of tannins and other phenolics: we need a change in approach. Functional Ecology 25: 325-338. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2010.01826.x [ Links ]

Sánchez PM, Villarreal ML, Herrera-Ruiz M, Zamilpa A, Jiménez-Ferrer E, Trejo-Tapia G. 2013. In vivo anti-inflammatory and anti-ulcerogenic activities of extracts from wild growing and in vitro plants of Castilleja tenuiflora Benth. (Orobanchaceae). Journal of Ethnopharmacology 150: 1032-1037. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2013.10.002 [ Links ]

Sandoval E, Rojas LA, Guzmán RC, Carmona JL, Ponce SRM, León GC, Loyola BC, Vallejo ZMA, Medina AA. 2005. Técnicas aplicadas al estudio de la anatomía vegetal. Técnicas aplicadas al estudio de la anatomía vegetal. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. [ Links ]

Stitt M, Zeeman SC. 2012. Starch turnover: pathways, regulation and role in growth. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 15: 282-292. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2012.03.016 [ Links ]

Tennakoon K, Pate J. 1996. Heterotrophic gain of carbon from hosts by the xylem- apping root hemiparasite Olax phyllanthi (Olacaceae). Oecologia 105: 369-376. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00328740 [ Links ]

Tesitel J, Leps J, Vrablova M, Cameron DD. 2011. The role of heterotrophic carbon acquisition by the hemiparasitic plant Rhinanthus alectorolophus in seedling establishment in natural communities: a physiological perspective. New Phytologist 192: 188-199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03777.x [ Links ]

Tesitel J, Plavcova L, Cameron DD. 2010a. Heterotrophic carbon gain by the root hemiparasites, Rhinanthus minor and Euphrasia rostkoviana (Orobanchaceae). Planta 231: 1137-1144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-010-1114-0 [ Links ]

Tesitel J, Plavcova L, Cameron DD. 2010b. Interactions between hemiparasitic plants and their hosts: the importance of organic carbon transfer. Plant Signaling Behaviour 5: 1072-1076. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4161/psb.5.9.12563 [ Links ]

Tesitel J, Tesitelova T, Fisher JP, Leps J, Cameron DD. 2015. Integrating ecology and physiology of root-hemiparasitic interaction: interactive effects of abiotic resources shape the interplay between parasitism and autotrophy. New Phytologist 205: 350-360. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13006 [ Links ]

Van Bel AJE. 1990. Xylem-Phloem Exchange Via the Rays: The Undervalued Route of Transport. Jounal of Experimental Botany 41: 631-644. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/41.6.631 [ Links ]

Vannini AB, Santos TG, Fleming AC, Purnhagen LRP, Lourenço LA, Butzke ETB, Kempt M, Begnini IM, Rebelo RA, Dalmarco EM, Bella Cruz A, Schmit AP, Cruz RCB, Yamanaka CN, Steindel M. 2012. Chemical characterization and antimicrobial evaluation of the essential oils from Baccharis uncinella D.C. and Baccharis semiserrata D.C. (Asteraceae). Journal of Essential Oil Research 24: 547-554. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10412905.2012.728092 [ Links ]

Visser J, Dörr I, Kollmann R. 1984. The “hyaline body” of the root parasite Alectra orobanchoides Benth. (Scrophulariaceae)- its anatomy, ultraestructure and histochemistry. Protoplasma 121: 146-156 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01279762 [ Links ]

Watling J, Press M. 1997. How is the relationship between the C4 cereal Sorghum bicolor and the C3 root hemi-parasites Striga hermonthica and Striga asiatica affected by elevated CO2? Plant and Cell Environment 20: 1292-1300. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3040.1997.d01-19.x [ Links ]

Westwood JH. 2013. The Physiology of the Established Parasite-Host Association. In: Joel DM, Gressel J, Musselman LJ (eds). Parasitic Orobanchaceae: Parasitic Mechanisms and Control Strategies. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 87-114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38146-1_6 [ Links ]

Westwood JH, Yoder JI, Timko MP, dePamphilis CW. 2010. The evolution of parasitism in plants. TRENDS in Plant Science 15: 227-235. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2010.01.004 [ Links ]

Xavier VB, Vargas RMF, Minteguiaga M, Umpiérrez N, Dellacassa E, Cassel E. 2013. Evaluation of the key odorants of Baccharis anomala DC essential oil: New applications for known products. Industrial Crops and Products 49: 492-496. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.05.011 [ Links ]

Yoder JI, Gunathilake P, Jamison-McClung D. 2009. Hemiparasitic Plants: Exploiting Their Host’s Inherent Nature to Talk. In Baluska F. Plant-Environment Interactions. From sensory plant biology to active plant behavior. Springer 85-100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89230-4_5. ISBN 978-3-540-89229-8 [ Links ]

Yoshida S, Cui S, Ichihashi Y, Shirasu K. 2016. The haustorium, a specialized invasive organ in parasitic plants. Annual Reviews in Plant Biology 67: 643-667. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-043015-111702 [ Links ]

Associated editor: Silvia Aguilar Rodríguez

Received: September 19, 2018; Accepted: January 08, 2019

* Corresponding author: Gabriela Trejo-Tapia, e-mail: gttapia@ipn.mx.

Author contributions: EMH, KBT and GTT designed the research; EMH and JLTE performed the experiments. ESZ contributed with the histological and histochemical methods. EMH, KBT and GTT wrote the manuscript with the contributions of all the authors. GTT edited the manuscript.

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License