SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.96 número3Infectivity and effectivity of commercial and native arbuscular mycorrhizal biofertilizers in seedlings of maize (Zea mays)Phytochemical screening and anti-virulence properties of Ceiba pentandra and Ceiba aesculifolia (Malvaceae) bark extracts and fractions índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Botanical Sciences

versión On-line ISSN 2007-4476versión impresa ISSN 2007-4298

Bot. sci vol.96 no.3 México jul./sep. 2018

https://doi.org/10.17129/botsci.1910 

Physiology

Production of callus and roots from lateral meristems of Loeselia mexicana

Aguirre-Alberto Lizeth1 

Martínez-Cárdenas María de Lourdes1  * 

1 Departamento de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Unidad Iztapalapa, Iztapalapa, Mexico City, Mexico.


Abstract:

Background:

Loeselia mexicana, known as Mexican false calico, or espinosilla in Spanish, is a widely distributed secondary forest plant with a significant number of medicinal and cosmetic uses. This species is threatened by the lack of regulation over collection methods and changes in land use. In vitro culture could be used to preserve the species by shoot induction, callus production and cell-suspension to obtain secondary metabolites; this would reduce the need to affect wild populations.

Hypothesis:

A combination of cytokinins and auxins can induce structural development in the plant, promoting the formation of shoots, roots or callus in vitro. By applying this combination to L. mexicana stem segments, we expected to observe new shoots or callus.

Study site and dates:

“El Teuhtli” volcano, Xochimilco; from June 2015 to February 2016.

Methods:

Distal stems cuttings were used as explants. They were disinfected with 1 % soap, 0.6 sodium hypochlorite and 70 % ethanol, and rinsed with distilled water. Two different times of disinfection with ethanol were tested. The distal stem segments were then planted in solid MS medium with 3, 5 or 7 mg L-1 KIN combined with 3 mg L-1 NAA, and 2 % AC.

Results:

A favorable response was observed in the treatment with 5 mg L-1 KIN and 3 mg L-1 NAA, which produced green callus with root in five weeks. Furthermore, a lower explant mortality rate was achieved, 46.66 % in three weeks, with a shorter disinfection time.

Conclusions:

Disinfection time is important for this species, and callus production is possible.

Keywords: callus; espinosilla; medicinal; meristems; organogenesis

Resumen:

Antecedentes:

Loeselia mexicana, conocida como espinosilla, es una planta de vegetación secundaria con diversos usos medicinales y cosméticos. Esta especie podría estar amenazada debido a la falta de regulación en la colecta y por cambios en el uso del suelo. El cultivo in vitro es una alternativa para la preservación de la especie por inducción de brote, producción de callo, y células en suspensión para la obtención de metabolitos secundarios; esto reduce la necesidad de intervenir en las poblaciones silvestres.

Hipótesis:

La combinación de citocininas y auxinas puede inducir el desarrollo de las estructuras en la planta, promoviendo la formación in vitro de brotes, raíz o callo. Al aplicar esta combinación a segmentos de tallo de L. mexicana, se esperaba observar nuevos brotes o callo.

Sitio de estudio y fechas:

Volcán "El Teuhtli", Xochimilco, de junio de 2015 a febrero de 2016.

Métodos:

Se cortó la parte distal del tallo como explante. Se desinfectó con jabón al 1 %, cloro al 10 %, etanol a 70 % y se enjuagó con agua destilada. Se probaron dos tiempos con el etanol. Se sembró en MS sólido con 3, 5, o 7 mgL-1 de KIN combinado con 3 mgL-1 de ANA, y 2 % de CA.

Resultados:

En la combinación con 5 mgL-1 KIN y 3 mgL-1 ANA se observó una respuesta favorable al producir callo verde con raíz en cinco semanas. Además, con un menor tiempo de desinfección se logró una menor tasa de mortalidad de los esquejes, el 46.66 % en tres semanas.

Conclusiones:

El tiempo de desinfección es importante con esta especie, y es posible la producción de callo.

Palabras clave: callo; espinosilla; medicinal; meristemos; organogénesis

Loeselia mexicana (Polemoniaceae) is a monocotyledonous, perennial, bushy angiosperm, with ramified and woody stems (CONABIO 2009), not entirely lignified, according to Rzedowski & Calderón (1995), with red to rosy 1 cm long flowers. It grows in generally undisturbed pine-oak areas. It is widely distributed from the south of the United States to western and southwestern Mexico (Arizaga 2007), and it is considered native to Mexico. It is locally known as "espinosilla" (prickly), and it has several medicinal uses in the treatment of "scares" (sustos) and anxiety (Navarro-García et al. 2007, Herrera-Ruiz et al. 2011, Guzmán-Gutiérrez et al. 2014), diarrhea (Rojas et al. 1999, Salud-Pérez et al. 2005, Palombo 2006), postpartum fever, some respiratory ailments (CONABIO 2009), skin diseases (BDMTM 2009), and kidney inflammation (FAO 2002); it is also used as an antifungal agent (Navarro-García et al. 2011). This plant also has cosmetic uses in hair and skin care, for which the aerial part is ground or consumed as an infusion. Thus, this species has great industrial and commercial potential (SEDEREC 2012) and has been classified as a non-wood forest product (FAO 2002).

Mexico loses more than two hectares of wild vegetation per minute (Reyes-Santiago et al. 2011), while 99 % of medicinal plants are of wild origin (Muñetón-Pérez 2009). The irrational exploitation of vegetation and the destruction of natural habitats threaten many wild species and the resources associated with them (RECNAT 1997). In the case of L. mexicana, if collection methods and changes in land use are not regulated, it could soon become an endangered species.

An alternative method of plant propagation is tissue culture from sprouts, or callus and root induction from explants such as lateral meristems of shoots, leaves and flowers, among others (Cardoza 2008). Auxins and cytokinins are the most widely used plant growth regulators (PGR); in combination, they promote organogenesis and can induce the development of lateral shoots, callus or roots. If callus is produced, secondary organogenesis can then occur, or the callus can be used to produce secondary metabolites. Plant micropropagation is another alternative for the preservation of wild species of medicinal and commercial importance (Rout et al. 2000).

Since there are no known studies on the culture of L. mexicana, this study focused on the development of a protocol for the in vitro production of callus from lateral buds of L. mexicana, and on the determination of adequate disinfection times, and the concentration and ratio of kinetin (KIN) and naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA) that can induce the growth of shoots or callus in culture.

Materials and methods

Study area. Northwestern slope of the "El Teuhtli" volcano, located at 19° 13' 44'' N, 99° 2' 55'' W, between the municipalities of Tláhuac, Xochimilco and Milpa Alta in Mexico City.

Biological material. Distal and green parts of the stems of Loeselia mexicana were collected every two months between June 2015 and February 2016. They were wrapped in Kraft-type paper and plastic bags and refrigerated at 7 °C for a maximum of two days after collection.

Culture media. Solid MS (Murashige & Skoog 1962) was supplemented with 30 g L-1 (3 %) sucrose and 0.4 % Phytagel, and in treatments 4 and 5 20 gL-1 Activated Carbon (AC). In all the treatments, KIN was added in concentrations of 3, 5, or 7 mg L-1, as well as 3 mg L-1 of NAA; five repetitions per treatment were performed. The pH was adjusted to 5.8 and sterilization was performed in an autoclave at 120 atm for 20 min. Five assays or treatments were performed.

Disinfection of biological material. After removing the leaves, the stems were cut in 5 cm segments and disinfected in a sterile area using a) 0.1 % Soap for 10 min, b) 0.6 % Sodium hypochlorite for 15 or 10 min, and c) 70 % Ethanol for 10 or 5 minutes. The stem segments were rinsed with distilled water for 2 min before the application of each disinfectant. The washing time was adjusted based on the results obtained (Figure 1).

Figure 1 Protocol for callus induction using lateral meristems from shoots of Loeselia mexicana (Green: favorable response). 

Planting and incubation. Three 1 cm cuttings were planted in each jar and incubated in a growth chamber at 25 °C with a photoperiod of 16 h of light and 35 µmol m-2 s-1 of light intensity. The number of initial buds per cutting, the total mortality rate (% of dead explants and % of contaminated explants) and the survival rate were recorded at the fifth week of incubation, together with the presence of callus and roots.

Replanting. The explants that showed a response were replanted on week 11 in the same type of medium they were incubated in. After one month, the obtained callus was replanted with 3 or 7 mg L-1 KIN combined with 3 mg L-1 NAA. Before replanting, the callus was segmented into units of approximately 0.5 cm in length. The roots produced from callus were cultured on solid MS medium with 2 % AC and 3 mg L-1 BAP, combined with 1 mg L-1 NAA to increase root production.

Statistical analysis. To determine the adequate disinfection time, the total mortality rate was compared with the survival rate using a chi-square test (P < 0.05). A Z-test was used to find differences between the mortality rate values. The values were adjusted to avoid errors.

Results

In the study site, between June and August, most of the species population was found in a vegetative state; flowering was observed from September to October, and capsules with seeds were found from November to February.

After one week, some explants turned yellowish and died, while others were contaminated. Half of the treatments had a mortality rate of 100 % at week 3, which was associated with disinfection times. This association is shown in Table 1. In treatments 1 to 3, without AC, the mortality rate was 100 %. In treatment 3, the mortality rate was 55.55 % at week 10, but it later reached 75.75 % (not shown in Table 1). In treatments 4 and 5 (the latter used a shorter disinfection time), with AC, the survival rate was 26.66 % and 53.34 % respectively, while the contamination rate was 35.56 % and 23.33 %.

Table 1 Survival Rate (SR) and Mortality Rate (MR) of L. mexicana during three weeks of incubation and for different washing times per solution. 

EXP DISINFECTANT (min) CONTAMINATION
(%)
DEATH
(%)
TOTAL
MR
SR
Soap Chlorine Ethanol Distilled
water
1 10 15 10 10 13.33 86.67 100 0
2 10 15 10 2 60 40 100 0
3 10 15 10 2 13.33 42.22 55.55 44.45
4 10 15 10 2 35.56 37.78 73.34 26.66
5 10 10 5 2 23.33 23.33 46.66 53.34

EXP = treatment

The results of the chi-square test indicated significant differences between the treatments shown in Table 12 = 127.54; P = 1.30 × 10-26); treatments 3 and 5 are statistically the same (Z = -1.26), even though AC was used in treatment 5. When the type and time of disinfection required to obtain aseptic cultures with acceptable survival rates were determined, all following inductions were carried using those parameters. Table 2 shows the response obtained at week 5. In treatment 3, which used a combination of 3 mg L-1 KIN and 3 mg L-1 NAA, a brown protuberance and white villosity were observed in one cutting (Figure 2a); this represents 6.6 % of the total cuttings planted. At week 14 (Figure 3a), this cutting developed a considerable amount of root tissue as well as a small amount of brown callus without shoots. At week 20, this cutting was replanted using another concentration of PGR and it didn't show any further response.

Table 2 Total nodes and planted explants per treatment, and response per combination, week 5. 

EXP NO. OF
EXPLANTS
NO. OF
NODES
CALLUS RESPONSE (%)
K:A 1 K:A 2 K:A 3 K:A 1 K:A 2 K:A 3
1 45 83 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 45 99 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 45 106 1 1 2 6.66 6.66 13.33
4 45 169 0 0 0 0 0 0
5 30 156 0 0 0 0 0 0

EXP = treatment; K:A1 = 3 mgL-1 KIN : 3 mgL-1 NAA; K:A2 = 5 mgL-1: 3 mgL-1; K:A3 = 7 mgL-1: 3 mgL-1.

Figure 2 Callus of L. mexicana after five weeks in culture on solid MS medium with KIN:NAA. Combinations: a) 3:3, b) 5:3, c) 7:3 mg L-1

Figure 3 Callus of L. mexicana four weeks after subculture (week 15 after cutting) on solid MS medium with KIN:NAA: a) 3:3, b) 5:3, c) 7:3 mg L-1, and AC 2 %. 

In the treatment with 5 mg KIN and 3 mg L-1 NAA, green-colored protuberances were observed in one cutting at week five (Figure 2b); represents 6.6 % of the total number of cuttings planted using this combination of growth regulators. Three weeks after replanting, the presence of thin roots was observed, as well as more green-colored callus. Roots grew up to 4 cm, approximately (Figure 4). The first roots that appeared in the callus with this treatment —which was replanted in MS medium with BAP 3 mg L-1 and NAA 1 mg L-1— produced more roots (Figure 5); however, no shoots were produced.

Figure 4 Callus 7 weeks after subculture with KIN:NAA: 5:3 mg L-1. Root hairs were observed (20X). 

Figure 5 Roots from callus cultured on solid MS medium with BAP:NAA. a) After five weeks with KIN:NAA 5:3 mg L-1. b) Only new roots had root hairs (20X). 

In the treatment with 7 mg L-1 KIN and 3 mg L-1 ANA (Figure 2c), brown callus was observed on two cuttings, also at week 5; this represents 13.3 % of the total number of cuttings planted using this combination of growth regulators. At week 11, one of the calluses developed a root of approximately 0.5 cm; the other callus showed no response. The responsive callus was replanted twice in MS medium with another concentration of PGR, 5 mg L-1 KIN and 3 mg L-1 NAA, to induce another type of response; it developed green calluses five months after replanting. The callus obtained with 5 mg L-1 KIN and 3 mg L-1 NAA was divided into two 0.5 cm units and replanted in the same medium. After a month, both had increased in volume, and it was possible to divide them into eight parts, which were subcultured. All the calluses obtained in these treatments were subcultured in MS with 5 mgL-1 KIN and 3 mgL-1 ANA and continued to increase in volume and developed roots (27 units), although some were oxidized on the surface.

Discussion

The washing time was decisive in achieving greater explant survival rate since it allowed to obtain aseptic in vitro cultures. In the present study, it was observed that reducing the time of exposition to the proposed disinfectants reduced the mortality rate while also controlling contamination (Table 1, treatments 3 and 5). Gamborg & Phillips (1995) recommend reducing the washing time or the concentration of chlorine and ethanol because of their reactivity. Iliev et al. (2010) recommend removing the stem's epidermis for better disinfection. Using a short disinfection time yielded similar results to those obtained in vitro with another bushy species (Wang et al. 2016), Cerasus humilis; however, they washed the explants with water first, and then with 75 % ethanol for 1 min and with 1 % sodium hypochlorite for 4 min.

Belukurava & Kuchuk (2014) report that young explants with woody or almost lignified stems secrete oxidized polyphenols when they are cut, which cause a delay in growth and, eventually, death. This effect is greater in lignified plants, and thus it is better to use explants with only primary growth, since they generally show a better response to de novo organogenesis (Olmos et al. 2010). This effect is the likely cause of the high mortality rate observed here in the first treatments with L. mexicana. In the treatments without AC, the explants suffered oxidation. For this reason, it was decided to use AC, mainly to avoid stem oxidation, and for its ability to remove inhibitory and toxic substances from the culture medium, even those released by the explant during incubation (Azofeifa 2009). In addition to serving as phenol adsorbent, AC contributed, together with a shorter disinfection time, to prolong the life of the planted cuttings (Table 1, Treatment 5).

Other recommended alternatives to control or prevent death by oxidation in herbaceous plants involve using an antioxidant solution, such as ascorbic acid combined with citric acid, in the culture medium (Çördük & Aki 2011); reducing the concentration of sucrose in the culture medium (Dong et al. 2016); or reducing to a minimum the disturbance of explants during the cutting process (Iliev et al. 2010). We recommend exploring the use of an anti-oxidant solution with and without AC, since the treatments performed in the present study did not show a significative difference in the mortality rate between treatments 3 and 5. We also recommend checking the oxidation percentage of explants, or to minimize the use of substances reducing the concentration of sucrose in the MS medium.

We determined that the brown and green protuberances that appeared in axillary stem buds were callus (Figures 2, 3) because they appeared in the nodal and internodal segments. Callus developed roots without the need to apply an additional PGR, which means that the number of substances and stages needed to form roots and achieve indirect organogenesis is not very large. Although the callus can be subjected to a redifferentiation process to obtain shoots and, afterwards, the regeneration of the plant through indirect organogenesis (Roca & Mroginski 1991), it is possible to produce more callus and subject it to a metabolite extraction process (Razavi et al. 2017). If the material is friable, cell suspensions can be obtained (Tang et al. 2010, Jin et al. 2017). There are even reports of other species, such as Catharanthus roseus, of which the transformed roots can be subjected to the same type of treatment used for cell suspension cultures (Tang et al. 2010). For these reasons, obtaining callus from lateral meristems of L. mexicana is an opportunity to verify whether the callus contains the secondary metabolites of medicinal interest found in the aerial part of the plant ( leaves and stem), as well as certain coumarines (Navarro-García 2007, Herrera-Ruiz et al. 2011, Navarro-García et al. 2011), flavones and sesquiterpene lactones (Pérez et al. 2005).

Regarding the response of the explants to the used PGR, Loyola-Vargas & Vázquez-Flota (2006), as well as Rout et al. (2000), mention that a low auxin concentration, combined with high concentrations of cytokinins, induces the development of shoots, while a high concentration of auxins, combined with a low concentration of cytokinins, induces the formation of roots. In the present study, a concentration of growth regulators of 3 mg L-1 (13 µM) KIN and 3 mg L-1 (16 µM) NAA caused the explants to develop a large number of roots (Figure 3a). In contrast, a low amount of the auxin NAA —3 mg L-1 (16 µM)— and a higher concentration of KIN —5 mg L-1 (23 µM)— resulted in the production of as much callus as roots in the culture medium (Figure 4).

The response rate to callus induction in treatment 3, considering all the treatments and cultured explants, was between 2.22 % and 4.44 %, with a response time of 5 weeks, which means that the in vitro culture of this species could be performed in a relatively short time. It is necessary to test other explant types with the same or other combinations of KIN and NAA to see if it is possible to produce callus like the one obtained with 5 mgL-1 KIN and 3 mgL-1 NAA in an even shorter period or to increase the response efficiency of the explants. An alternative could be to use other cytokinins such as BAP to try to induce the growth of shoots from callus, as Wang et al. (2016) did with bushy plants; it would be necessary to check whether the plants produce mainly callus.

Auxins are usually used for the generation roots in vitro root (Olmos et al. 2010). In the present work, we tested a combination of BAP and NAA in roots obtained from callus; after five weeks, the main root did not show any root hairs or villosities, as seen in Figure 5. This combination of PGR is used to promote the growth of buds from roots in herbaceous plants (Trejo-Tapia et al. 2012). Although the roots obtained here were thin and fragile, they could be candidates for a protocol to produce transformed roots and to obtain metabolites. Even though the biological material was collected from plants in two different developmental stages, the influence of climate on explant survival in vitro was discarded because, beginning with the time of storage, all explants were kept under certain conditions and exposed to exogenous PGR in a controlled way. Even so, we recommend keeping a stock or donor plant under controlled conditions (Olmos et al. 2010), such as a greenhouse. Keeping a sample of this species under controlled conditions, when attempting callus culture or in vitro propagation, could help establish an standard of the characteristics of the plant that have commercial interest without the need to intervene or disturb the wild population.

Based on our results, the time and type of disinfection were essential to achieve a longer survival time for the used explants. In this case, the best treatment was 10 min of soap, 10 min of 10 % chlorine, 5 min of 70 % ethanol, and 2 min of distilled water, with the addition of AC. The combination of PGR that showed the best response (in terms of production of callus and root) was 5 mg L-1 KIN and 3 mg L-1 NAA for five weeks. This shows that in vitro propagation from lateral buds of L. mexicana may be possible using callus induction. This research will serve as the basis for the further study of the best way to propagate L. mexicana in vitro or obtain friable callus, and even of the possible production of cell suspensions to search for secondary metabolites or induce shoots.

Acknowledgements

Gerardo J. Varela Hernández helped us as statistical adviser.

Literature cited

Arizaga S. 2007. Estudio y Colección Viva de Plantas Medicinales Nativas y Formación de un Banco de Germoplasma del Estado de Michoacán. Informe final. UNAM-Campus Morelia: Centro de Investigaciones en Ecosistemas. [ Links ]

Azofeifa A. 2009. Problemas de oxidación y oscurecimiento de explantes cultivados in vitro. Agronomía Mesoamericana 20: 153-175. [ Links ]

Belukurava V, Kuchuk N. 2014. In vitro Bank and Seed Collection of Wild-Growing Plants as a Tool for Plant Conservation and Utilization in Biotechnological Studies. In: Behl RK, Arseniuk E, eds. Biotechnology and Plant Breeding Perspectives. India: AEROBIOS International, 119-232. ISBN-13: 978-9381191040 [ Links ]

BDMTM [Biblioteca Digital de la Medicina Tradicional Mexicana]. 2009. Atlas de las plantas de la Medicina Tradicional Mexicana: Espinosilla. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. < http://www.medicinatradicionalmexicana.unam.mx/monografia.php?l=3&t=espinosilla&id=7538 > (accessed June 25, 2018) [ Links ]

CONABIO [Comisión Nacional para el uso de la Biodiversidad]. 2009. Polemoniaceae, Loeselia mexicana. < http://www.conabio.gob.mx/malezasdemexico/polemoniaceae/Loeselia-mexicana/fichas/ficha.htm > (accessed February 12, 2018). [ Links ]

Cardoza V. 2008. Tissue Culture: The Manipulation of Plant Development. In: Stewart CN, ed. Plant Biotechnology and Genetics: Principles, Techniques, and Applications. USA: John Wiley and Sons, 113-134. ISBN: 9780470043813; DOI:10.1002/9780470282014 [ Links ]

Çördük N, Aki C. 2011. Inhibition of browning problem during micropropagation of Sideritis trojana bornm., an endemic medicinal herb of Turkey. Romanian Biotechnological Letters 16: 6760-6765. [ Links ]

Dong Y, Fu C, Su P, Xu X, Yuan J, Wang S, Zhang M, Zhao C, Yu L. 2016. Mechanisms and effective control of physiological browning phenomena in plant cell cultures. Physiologia Plantarum 156: 13-28. DOI: 10.1111/ppl.12382 [ Links ]

FAO [Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations]. 2002. Estado de la Información Forestal en México. Vol. 11. Información para el Desarrollo Forestal Sostenible, PROYECTO GCP/RLA/133/EC, Chile, 179-279. [ Links ]

Gamborg O, Phillips G eds. 1995. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture: Fundamental Methods. Germany: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-79048-5; ISBN: 978-3-642-48974-7 [ Links ]

Guzmán-Gutiérrez L, Reyes-Chilpa R, Bonilla-Jaime H. 2014. Medicinal plants for the treatment of “nervios”, anxiety, and depression in Mexican Traditional Medicine (Review). Brazilian Journal of Pharmacognosy 24: 591-608. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjp.2014.10.007 [ Links ]

Herrera-Ruiz M, González-Carranza A, Zamilpa A, Jiménez-Ferrer E, Huerta-Reyes M, Navarro-García VM. 2011. The standardized extract of Loeselia mexicana possesses anxiolytic activity through the α-amino butyric acid mechanism. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 138: 262-267. DOI: 10.1016/j.jep.2011.09.010 [ Links ]

Iliev I, Gajdosová A, Libiaková G, Jain SM. 2010. Plant Micropropagation. In: Davey MR, Anthony P, eds. Plant Cell Culture: Essential Methods. UK: John Wiley & Sons, 1-23. ISBN: 9780470686485; DOI: 10.1002/9780470686522 [ Links ]

Jin L, Yang Y, Gao W, Gong M, Wang J, Anderson NO, He M. 2017. Establishment of Callus Induction and Cell Suspension Cultures of Dendrathema Indicum var. Aromaticum a Scented Chrysanthemum. Journal of Plant Studies 6: 38-44. DOI: 10.5539/jps.v6n2p38 [ Links ]

Loyola-Vargas V, Vázquez-Flota F eds. 2006. Plant Cell Culture Protocols. USA: Humana Press. ISBN 978-1-58829-547-7; DOI: 10.1385/1592599591 [ Links ]

Muñetón-Pérez P. 2009. Plantas medicinales: un complemento vital para la salud de los mexicanos. Entrevista con el Dr. Erick Estrada Lugo. Revista Digital Universitaria 10: 1-9. [ Links ]

Murashige T, Skoog F. 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Biologia Plantarum 15: 473-497. [ Links ]

Navarro-García VM, Herrera-Ruiz M, Rojas G, Zepeda LG. 2007. Coumarin Derivatives from Loeselia mexicana. Determination of the Anxiolytic Effect of Daphnoretin on Elevated Plus-maze. Journal of the Mexican Chemical Society 51: 193-197. [ Links ]

Navarro-García V, Rojas G, Avilés M, Fuentes M, Zepeda G. 2011. In vitro antifungal activity of coumarin extracted from Loeselia mexicana Brand. Mycoses 54: e569-e571. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0507.2010.01993.x [ Links ]

Olmos S, Luciani G, Galdeano E. 2010. Métodos de propagación y conservación del germoplasma: Micropopagación. In: Levitus G, Echenique V, Rubinstein C, Hoop E, Mroginski L, eds. Biotecnología y Mejoramiento Vegetal II. Argentina: Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), 353-362. [ Links ]

Palombo EA. 2006. Phytochemicals from Traditional Medicinal Plants used in the Treatment of Diarrhea: Modes of Action and Effects on Intestinal Function (Review). Phytotherapy Research 20: 717-724. DOI: 10.1002/ptr.1907 [ Links ]

Pérez GS, Pérez GC, Zavala MA. 2005. A study of the antidiarrheal properties of Loeselia mexicana on mice and rats. Phytomedicine 12: 670-674. [ Links ]

Razavi SM, Arshneshin H, Ghasemian A. 2017. In vitro callus induction and isolation of volatile compounds in callus culture of Lallemantia iberica (M. Bieb.) Fisch. & C. A. Mey. Journal of Plant Process and Function 5: 65-68. [ Links ]

RECNAT [Recursos Naturales]. 1997. Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-005-RECNAT-1997 que establece los procedimientos, criterios y especificaciones para realizar el aprovechamiento, transporte y almacenamiento de corteza, tallos y plantas completas de vegetación forestal. México: Diario Oficial de la Federación. 23/04/2003. [ Links ]

Reyes-Santiago PJ, Islas-Luna MA, González-Zorzano O, Carrillo-Reyes P, Vergara-Silva FR, Brachet-Ize CP. 2011. Echeveria: Manual del Perfil Diagnóstico del Género Echeveria en México. Mexico: Universidad Autónoma de Chapingo. ISBN: 978-607-12-0218-5 [ Links ]

Roca W, Mroginski L. 1991. Cultivo de Tejidos en la Agricultura: Fundamentos y Aplicaciones. Colombia: Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical. ISBN: 958-9183-15-8 [ Links ]

Rojas A, Bah M, Rojas J I, Serrano V, Pacheco S. 1999. Spasmolytic activity of some plants used by the Otomi Indians of Querétaro (México) for the treatment of gastrointestinal disorders. Phytomedicine 6: 367-371. DOI: 10.1016/S0944-7113(99)80061-0 [ Links ]

Rout G, Samantaray S, Das P. 2000. In vitro manipulation and propagation of medicinal plants Biotechnology Advances 18: 91-120. DOI: 10.1016/S0734-9750(99)00026-9 [ Links ]

Rzedowski J, Calderón de Rzedowski G. 1995. Flora del bajío y de regiones adyacentes: Polemoniaceae. Pátzcuaro, Michoacán: Instituto de Ecología, A.C.-Centro Regional del Bajío 33: 1-41 [ Links ]

Salud-Pérez S, Cuauhtémoc-Pérez G, Zavala MA. 2005. A study of the antidiarrheal properties of Loeselia mexicana on mice and rats. Phytomedicine 12: 670-674. [ Links ]

SEDEREC [Secretaría de Desarrollo Rural y Equidad para las Comunidades]. 2012. Programa para la recuperación de la medicina tradicional y la herbolaria en la Ciudad de México. Tomo II. Gaceta Oficial del Distrito Federal, 106-115. [ Links ]

Tang K, Zhang L, Chen J, Xiao Y, Chen W, Sun X. 2010. Secondary Products. In: Davey MR, Anthony P, eds. Plant Cell Culture: Essential Methods. UK: John Wiley & Sons, 297-315. Print ISBN: 9780470686485; DOI: 10.1002/9780470686522 [ Links ]

Trejo-Tapia G, R-Romero G, L-Laredo AR, B-Torres K, Zamilpa A. 2012. In vitro Organ Cultures of the Cancer Herb Castilleja tenuiflora Benth. as Potential Sources of Iridoids and Antioxidant Compounds. In: Orhan I, ed. Biotechnological Production of Plant Secondary Metabolites. Turkey: Bentham Science Publishers, 87-106. DOI: 10.2174/97816080511441120101; ISBN: 978-1-60805-410-7 [ Links ]

Wang RF, Huang FL, Zhang J, Zhang QY, Sun LN, Song XS. 2016. Establishment of a high-frequency regeneration system in Cerasus humilis, an important economic shrub. Journal of Forest Research 21: 244-250. DOI: 10.1007/s10310-016-0535-4 [ Links ]

1Associated Editor: Martín Mata Rosas

Received: November 15, 2017; Accepted: April 27, 2018

* Corresponding author: María de Lourdes Martínez-Cárdenas, e-mail: macl@xanum.uam.mx.

Author contributions: Lizeth Aguirre-Alberto collected material, performed the treatments, and wrote the article. María de Lourdes Martínez-Cárdenas defined the collection zone, led the project, designed the treatments, and contributed to the writing of the article.

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License