SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.29 número2Disparidad temporal de la producción maderera nativa en Paraíba, BrasilPartición de la precipitación en dos arbóreas leguminosas nativas en la región Andina, Colombia índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Revista Chapingo serie ciencias forestales y del ambiente

versión On-line ISSN 2007-4018versión impresa ISSN 2007-3828

Rev. Chapingo ser. cienc. for. ambient vol.29 no.2 Chapingo may./ago. 2023  Epub 05-Abr-2024

https://doi.org/10.5154/r.rchscfa.2022.04.023 

Scientific articles

Willingness to pay for hydrological ecosystem services in Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico

Gabriel Chablé-Rodríguez1 

Manuel de J. González-Guillén1  * 
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1814-4320

Armando Gómez-Guerrero1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7261-1279

Teresa M. González-Martínez1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1629-5184

Demetrio S. Fernández-Reynoso2 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1734-3152

1Colegio de Postgraduados, Posgrado en Ciencias Forestales, Campus Montecillo. Carretera México-Texcoco, km 36.5, Montecillo. C. P. 56230. Texcoco, Estado de México, México.

2Colegio de Postgraduados, Posgrado en Hidrociencias, Campus Montecillo. Carretera México-Texcoco, km 36.5, Montecillo. C. P. 56230. Texcoco, Estado de México, México.


Abstract

Introduction:

The city of Xalapa, Veracruz, faces a drinking water supply problem that increases every year due, among other factors, to deforestation and population growth.

Objective:

To determine the willingness to pay (WTP) of domestic water users for forest conservation, taking into account the recharge zones of the Pixquiac sub-basin.

Materials and methods:

A structured survey was designed and randomly applied to a representative sample of 113 households in Xalapa. The information was analyzed using an econometric model identifying the main social, economic and environmental aspects related to WTP for hydrological service for domestic use.

Results and discussion:

The potential annual WTP amounts to 17 243 032.08 MXN by domestic water service users in Xalapa, Veracruz; 92.04 % of the population has an average monthly WTP of 10.23 MXN for the conservation of forest areas. This value is considered high in relation to other studies whose average contribution per person is 5.00 MXN and may be due to the high level of awareness that exists in the region about the importance of forests. Income, source of income, educational level and age are significant variables positively related to WTP.

Conclusion:

There is WTP by users that can be used to encourage forest conservation in water recharge zones in the study area.

Keywords: drinking water; econometric model; Pixquiac; hydrological sub-basin; contingent valuation

Resumen

Introducción:

La ciudad de Xalapa, Veracruz, enfrenta un problema de abastecimiento de agua potable que incrementa cada año debido, entre otros factores, a la deforestación y al incremento poblacional.

Objetivo:

Determinar la disposición a pagar (DAP) de los usuarios de agua de uso doméstico para la conservación de bosques, considerando las zonas de recarga de la subcuenca Pixquiac.

Materiales y métodos:

Se diseñó y aplicó aleatoriamente una encuesta estructurada a una muestra representativa de 113 hogares en Xalapa. La información se analizó a través de un modelo econométrico que identificó los principales aspectos sociales, económicos y ambientales, relacionados con la DAP por el servicio hidrológico de uso doméstico.

Resultados y discusión:

El potencial de la DAP anual asciende a 17 243 032.08 MXN por parte de usuarios del servicio de agua potable a nivel doméstico en Xalapa, Veracruz; 92.04 % de la población tiene una DAP mensual promedio de 10.23 MXN para la conservación de las áreas forestales. Este valor se considera alto en relación con otros estudios cuyo promedio de aportación por persona oscila en 5.00 MXN y puede deberse al alto nivel de concientización que existe en la región sobre la importancia de los bosques. El ingreso, la fuente de ingresos, el nivel educativo y la edad son variables significativas que se relacionan positivamente con la DAP.

Conclusión:

Existe la DAP por parte de los usuarios que puede aprovecharse para incentivar la conservación forestal en las zonas de recarga de agua en el área de estudio.

Palabras clave: agua potable; modelo econométrico; Pixquiac; subcuenca hidrológica; valoración contingente

Highlights:

  • Willingness to pay (WTP) of drinking water users in the Pixquiac sub-basin was established.

  • This population (92.04 %) has a monthly WTP of 10.23 MXN per household for forest conservation.

  • Annual WTP of drinking water service users in Xalapa amounts to 17 243 032.08 MXN.

  • Income, source of income, educational level and age are positively related to WTP.

Introduction

Communities in Mexico have environmental and biological wealth within their ecosystems that can be used to enhance social and economic development (Carrie et al., 2022; Wang et al., 2017), for landscape conservation (Arroyo-Rodríguez et al., 2017; Leija & Mendoza, 2021) and to maintain the cultural value of the surrounding environment (Clarke et al., 2021; Ko & Son, 2018). However, one of the main problems, derived from the uncontrolled demographic increase, is the decrease and deterioration of such wealth disturbing the functionality of forest areas and deteriorating their ecosystem services (Taye et al., 2018), leading to the reduction of water supply (Monroy Hernández, 2020), loss of biodiversity (Dib et al., 2020) and soil degradation (Pereira et al., 2018).

Currently, drinking water scarcity in Mexico is a growing problem (Martínez-Austria et al., 2019); approximately 32 % of the population is estimated to face some degree of scarcity in supply (Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía [INEGI], 2019). Therefore, corrective and proactive measures are required to achieve the conservation and optimal use of ecosystems (Börner et al., 2020).

In the city of Xalapa, Veracruz, water supply depends mainly on the Huitzilapan and Pixquiac sub-basins (Garcia-Cool, 2019), both belonging to the upper basin of La Antigua River. The Pixquiac sub-basin is considered of greater importance because of its proximity to the city and the quality of water it provides. In the region, the conversion of land from forestry to agricultural and residential use reduces both the capacity for groundwater recharge and other ecosystem services, mainly due to the lack of economic incentives for their conservation. This, together with the increase in the quantity demanded, causes an imbalance between consumption and supply, resulting in a shortage of drinking water for the city. In recent years, the supply has gradually decreased, limiting the supply to only a few days a week. In the past, this restriction was only applied during the dry season; however, municipal authorities are now considering permanent rationing to guarantee supply to the entire population.

Increasing and ensuring the supply of drinking water in the city requires strategies and actions for integrated management and protection of forest areas, as well as the strengthening of public policies aimed at water catchment areas. In this sense, it is necessary to generate a payment scheme for ecosystem services, so it is important to know if there is economic potential to contribute to the implementation of these efforts.

Economic valuation, viewed from the environmental economic approach, provides tools assigning monetary values to the ecosystem services provided by the natural environment (Tinch et al., 2019). These assigned values incorporate negative and positive externalities to land management (Bleeker & Vos, 2019) together with the preservation of natural resources (Liu & Kontoleon, 2018).

There are various techniques and methods for valuing ecosystem services (Cristeche & Penna, 2008), from those based on market values to those using stated or revealed preferences (Izko & Burneo, 2003). One of the most widely used because of its versatility is the contingent valuation method (CVM), which aims to estimate people's maximum willingness to pay for the provision or improvement of a good that does not have a market price, or to estimate the minimum willingness to receive compensation for a loss or reduction in the enjoyment of that good (Girma et al., 2021; Navrud & Strand, 2018).

Historically, the valuation of public goods through surveys has an important reference value. During the second half of the 1960s, several studies were conducted that primarily applied the CVM to environmental goods and recreational uses. In the 1970s, Randall et al. (1974) played an important role in increasing reliability and acceptance of the method with rigorous theoretical and applied work. These advances, combined with a maturing process and social needs of environmental economics as a discipline, especially in the United States, have given a clear impetus to CVM. In the second half of the 1980s, Cummings et al. (1986) and Mitchell and Carson (1989) analyzed the development of the probability valuation method and contributed decisively to its popularization in many countries, including the United States. Recently, several studies have addressed the CVM to determine the willingness of users to pay for the conservation of forest ecosystems (Resende et al., 2017), ecological protection of forest areas that provide hydrological ecosystem services (HES; Chu et al., 2020) or restoration of degraded areas in watersheds. The broad use of CVM is based on its versatility, adaptability and relative simplicity to the topic under study, allowing direct analysis of the information collected (Bergstrom & Loomis, 2017).

The objective of this research was to determine the willingness to pay (WTP) of domestic water users in Xalapa, Veracruz, to conserve forest recharge areas and promote a better condition of the current situation or prevent it from worsening. This was achieved through quantitative analysis and generation of an econometric model, including environmental and socioeconomic variables. The hypothesis is that water users are willing to pay a sufficient contribution to conserve the required quality and supply of drinking water, taking into account the past, present and future situation in the city.

Materials and Methods

Study area

The city of Xalapa, capital of the state of Veracruz, Mexico, is located between parallels 19° 29’ and 19° 36’ N and 96° 48’ and 96° 58’ W with an elevation ranging between 700 and 1 600 m (Sistema de Información Estadística y Geográfica del Estado de Veracruz de Ignacio de la Llave [SIEGVER], 2020). The city has an area of 124.38 km2 and is home to a population of 488 531 inhabitants (INEGI, 2020). Annually, the volume supplied with drinking water is 32.3 million m3; the Pixquiac sub-basin contributes 9.69 millon m3 and the Huitzilapan sub-basin contributes 22.61 millon m3 (SIEGVER, 2020). The municipal agency in charge of administering drinking water services and contracting tapping rights for domestic, commercial and industrial use is the CMAS (Comisión Municipal de Agua Potable y Saneamiento). Water tariffs range from 14.59 to 167.07 MXN, depending on the consumption range (m3) and the classification on usage rights (CMAS, 2021).

Basic principles of the model used

The CVM is based on a formulation, developed by Hanemann (1984), which uses a direct function that compares the result of two utility functions. Positive responses focus on WTP, to obtain the good or service under study and achieve a higher utility than that obtained without paying for or accessing that service. The formulation of the economic utility model is centered on the assumption that there is a welfare function (B), given by the equation B = WTP + I + Bi + S; where: I = income, Bi = goods and services, and S = vector of socioeconomic characteristics of the respondent. In this study, Bi = 0; that is, it will be kept constant assuming that the welfare given by the HES does not depend on the goods and services paid by the consumer, therefore the function is represented as B = DAP + I + S.

If WTP is considered as a dichotomous variable where the value 1 represents an amount M for the conservation of forests that provide HES, then the function of B would be given by: 1 + (I-M) + S, which must be greater than B = 0 + 1 + S, where B = 0 for a negative response to WTP. The above indicates that the respondent prefers a decrease in his income on the condition that it improves his welfare, so the probability of a positive WTP depends on WTP = Probability of ∆B > 0; where: ∆B = (1 + (1 - M) + S) - (0 + 1 + S) > 0.

If WTP is considered as a function of income it could be represented as WTP = α 0 + β 1 I + β 2 S + ε j ; where, α 0 = intercept, β 1 = coefficient associated with income; β 2 = set of coefficients associated with the variables encompassing the socioeconomic-environmental characteristics factor and ε j = error. The coefficients associated with β, together with the intercept α, can be estimated using a regression model.

Survey design and development

A structured survey was designed and validated which included social, economic and cultural aspects on WTP for the conservation of forest areas that provide HES. The survey included three scenarios: 1) without scheduled distribution of water (situation that existed 10 years ago), 2) with scheduled distribution of water during the dry season (current situation), and 3) with permanent scheduled distribution of water (near future, under the current trend). Subsequently, for each scenario, a series of related questions were formulated, including WTP ranges for the conservation of forests that capture water in order to promote a better condition or prevent it from getting worse. For example, what would be the maximum WTP to move from the current scenario (scheduled distribution of water during the dry season) to a scenario without scheduled distribution of water? or what would be the maximum WTP to remain in the current situation and avoid moving to a situation with permanent scheduled distribution of water (all year round)?

The surveys were applied personally and directly to the head of household, during the months of June to December 2021, in representative areas of the city of Xalapa. This facilitated the concise explanation of the objective of the survey and clarify doubts related to the questions. The validation was done through several calibrations to the questions during the pilot surveys, so that the biases in the interpretation of questions by the respondents were minimal.

Design and type of sampling

A simple random sampling was applied through statistical analysis, which indicates that each member of the population (household) has the same probability of being included in the sample (Montesinos-López, 2010). The sample size was calculated from the following equation (Zavaleta et al., 2020):

n= NZ2   p(1-p)d2(N-1)+Z2p(1-p)

where,

n = sample size

N = population size

Z = confidence level

p = proportion of the population with the desired characteristic

1- p = proportion of the population without the desired characteristic

d = absolute precision level.

The data reported by SIEGVER (2020) indicate that there are 152 609 domestic water supplies in the city of Xalapa. By substituting the values in the above formula and taking into account a confidence level of 95 %, estimated error of 10 % and maximum variance of 0.5, a sample size of 113 households was derived.

Analysis of variables and development of the econometric model

The degree of association between variables was determined by Pearson correlation (P ≤ 0.05). For each variable, an analysis of variance and Tukey's mean comparison of WTP between categories was performed to determine if the associated values are significant (P < 0.0001). Three levels of significance were assigned: a) highly significant values, b) values with medium significance and c) low significance. These values are not mutually exclusive. On the contrary, a variable can be above medium significance but below high significance, which would be represented by two levels in the same variable.

A regression model was developed to determine the probability of WTP considering the socioeconomic and environmental variables as independent variables. Table 1 shows the variables in the model, as well as their categorization. The statistical analysis was performed with R-Studio 4.0.3 software. The proposed regression model is presented in the equation TP = α + β1AGE +  β2GENDER+  β3MARITAL.STATUS +  β4EDUC +  β5S.INCOME +  β6INCOME +  β7DEPEN  +  β8AVAILABLE.QUANTITY +β9WATER +β10FEE +εj.

Table 1 Regression model variables to estimate willingness to pay for hydrological ecosystem services in Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico. 

Model representation Variable description Type
WTP Willingness to pay 1 = yes
0 = no
AGE Age Integer
GENDER Gender 1 = male
0 = female
MARITAL.STATUS Marital status 1 = married
2 = single
3 = widow
4 = divorced
5 = free union
EDUC Level of education 1 = no schooling
2 = elementary
3 = secondary
4 = high school
5 = university
6 = graduate school
S.INCOME Main source of income 1 = public sector employee
2 = private sector employee
3 = own business
4 = retired-pensioned
INGR Income level 1 = ≤5 000 MXN
2 = between 5 001 and 10 000 MXN
3 = between 10 001 and 15 000 MXN
4 = between 15 001 and 20 000 MXN
5 = between 20 001 and 30 000 MXN
6 = between 30 001 and 50 000 MXN
7 = >50 000 MXN
DEPEN Financial dependents Integer
AVAILABLE.QUANTITY Perception of the available drinking water quantity over time 1 = decreased
2 = remained constant
3 = increased
4 = unknown
WATER Main source of drinking water supply in Xalapa 1 = nearby rivers
2 = from another state
3 = from forests
4 = unknown
FEE Monthly fee charged for water service Whole number and decimal

Results and Discussion

Econometric model of willingness to pay (WTP) estimation

A total of 113 people were surveyed. Based on the regression model, the adjusted R2 value (0.3989) indicates that 39.89 % of WTP in the study area can be explained by the combination of the variables included in the model. Although this value could be considered low, it is an acceptable value for contingent valuation analysis (Thapa et al., 2021). In socioeconomic studies, Gupta and Chatterjee (2021) and Irawan (2019) mention that an R2 value between 0.3 and 0.6 indicates that the proposed model has a satisfactory fit. On the other hand, the standard error 6.3162 represents the variability of WTP that is not explained by the regression. In this regard, Diswandi et al. (2021) mention that the better the model fit, the lower the error value. For the analysis performed, the error is considered acceptable because it is low and the adjusted R2 is within the permissible range. The P-value determines the significance of the analysis obtained, as long as the P-value is less than 0.05 (Perni et al., 2021); in this study, the P-value was close to zero (7.057e-10), so the model is considered feasible as a predictor of WTP. Table 2 shows the intercept and coefficient values for each of the variables included in WTP.

Table 2 Regression model results regarding willingness to pay for hydrological ecosystem services in Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico. 

Variables Coefficients Error t-value Pr(>|t|)
Intercept 10.2561 5.0196 2.0431 0.0436
Age 0.0847 0.0425 1.9905 0.0492
Gender -0.2105 1.2854 -0.1637 0.8702
Marital status -0.6547 0.4178 -1.5669 0.1202
Education 0.9588 0.4609 2.0799 0.0400
Source of income 1.174 0.4774 2.4587 0.0156
Income 1.4528 0.4039 3.5963 0.0004
Financial dependents -1.4908 0.6166 -2.4174 0.0174
Amount available* -1.1420 0.5646 -2.0226 0.0457
Water -1.3766 0.5690 -2.4191 0.0173
Fee -0.0290 0.0092 -3.1544 0.0021

* Perception of the available drinking water quantity over time. For each of the coefficients, Pr(>|t|) value less than 0.05 is considered significant.

Regarding the coefficients, four of the 10 variables evaluated are positively correlated with WTP, while the remaining six are negatively correlated (Table 2). The Pr(>|t|) value, for each of the coefficients, indicates that those that are less than 0.05 are considered significant within the model (Desta, 2018); this condition is met by almost all variables except for marital status and gender of the respondents.

The largest positive coefficient in the regression model is income, where WTP has a chance of increasing 1.45 MXN as income is higher in the intervals used. The income source variable indicates that WTP increases on average by 1.17 MXN when the respondent works in a private company or owns a business. The coefficient of educational level shows that as the level of education increases, WTP may increase by 0.95 MXN. Finally, WTP could increase by 0.08 MXN for each year of age of the respondent.

Regarding the negative coefficients, the coefficient of the variable water indicates that if the person has no knowledge about the sources of supply, then WTP will decrease on average by 1.37 MXN and vice versa. The perception of water availability over the years is a key factor in WTP because, if people consider that the amount of water has increased over time, then the amount they are willing to contribute decreases by 1.14 MXN. The coefficient of financial dependents indicates that the higher this number is, WTP will decrease by 1.49 MXN.

Model variables evaluation

Based on Figure 1, Pearson's correlation test showed no significant association, either positive or negative between the variables (P ≤ 0.05).

Figure 1 Pearson correlation analysis between independent variables of the regression model to estimate the willingness to pay for hydrological ecosystem services. EDUC: level of education, S.INCOME: source of income, DEPEN: financial dependents, AVAILABLE.QUANTITY: perception of the available quantity of drinking water over time. 

When comparing the means of WTP with respect to age, it was observed that the values were significant; when grouping the ages (Table 3), the highest significance was found in the interval from 41 to 60 years, as well as in people older than 60 years. This indicates that people older than 40 are more likely to have a higher WTP, followed by people older than 60 years.

Table 3 Respondents' willingness to pay (WTP) according to age classification in Xalapa, Veracruz. 

Age Frequency Percentage (%) WTP
20-35 37 32.74 7.75 b
36-40 13 11.50 7.30 b
41-60 46 40.71 12.39 a
>60 17 15.04 12.05 ab
Total 113 100.00

Different letters indicate significant differences in WTP between age groups, according to Tukey's comparison of means (P < 0.01).

According to the level of education (Table 4), the most significant group is the one with postgraduate studies. This is followed, with medium-high significance, by the groups with elementary school, high school and university education. Finally, the least significant groups are those with secondary education and those with no academic training. Therefore, the higher the level of schooling, the greater the probability of payment.

Table 4 Willingness to pay (WTP) of respondents according to level of education in Xalapa, Veracruz. 

Level of education Frequency Percentage (%) WTP
No schooling 3 2.65 1.00 b
Elementary school 18 15.93 7.90 ab
Secondary 20 17.70 6.57 b
High school 23 20.35 13.09 ab
University 32 28.32 10.75 ab
Graduate school 17 15.04 14.35 a
Total 113 100

Different letters indicate significant differences in WTP between study categories, according to Tukey's comparison of means (P < 0.01).

With respect to the source of income, Table 5 shows that the group of people who have their own business differs significantly from the groups of private sector workers and retirees or pensioners, who have a medium-high significance. Finally, the group of public sector workers has a medium significance. This indicates that people who generate their own income are more disposed to WTP.

Table 5 Respondents' willingness to pay (WTP) based on source of income in Xalapa, Veracruz. 

Main source of income Frequency Percentage (%) WTP
Public sector worker 11 9.73 6.54 b
Private sector worker 79 69.91 9.70 ab
Own business 19 16.81 14.73 a
Retired–Pensioned 4 3.54 9.50 ab
Total 113 100.00

Different letters indicate significant differences in WTP based on source of income, according to Tukey's comparison of means (P < 0.01).

According to Table 6, people earning between 20 000 and 30 000 MXN differ significantly from those with an income between 15 000 and 20 000 MXN, who have a high mean significance. People whose income is between 30 000 and 50 000 MXN have a medium significance. The group of respondents with an income level between 10 000 and 15 000 MXN has a low medium significance, while income levels of 10 000 MXN or less have a low significance. Finally, people with a medium-high income have higher WTP.

Table 6 Respondents' willingness to pay (WTP) based on income level in Xalapa, Veracruz. 

Level of income (MXN) Frequency Percentage (%) WTP
<5 000 18 15.93 4.83 c
5 001 - 10 000 20 17.70 6.40 c
10 001 - 15 000 19 16.81 8.26 bc
15 001 - 20 000 22 19.47 13.40 ab
20 001 - 30 000 18 15.93 17.22 a
30 001 - 50 000 16 14.16 11.25 b
>50 000 0 0.00 -
Total 113 100.00

Different letters indicate significant differences in WTP between income categories, according to Tukey's comparison of means (P < 0.01).

For financial dependents, which ranged from 2 to 5, the analysis showed that all groups had a similar WTP. Likewise, all groups based on the perception of the amount of water available and knowledge of the main source of drinking water supply (nearby rivers, from another state, from the forests in the highlands, unknown) had a similar WTP.

The monthly payment for drinking water service of the respondents is variable, so it was analyzed as a whole, and it was found that, on average, they pay monthly around 172.80 MXN. The lowest value as a water payment was 53.00 MXN and the highest was 278.00 MXN. For this case, the comparison of WTP means showed no significant differences between categories (P > 0.05).

Finally, regarding WTP, 92.04 % (104 respondents) expressed an affirmative response for the contribution of economic resources in favor of forest conservation and the provision of HES.

Willingness to pay for conservation

The potential WTP in the whole municipality amounts to 1 434 919.34 MXN monthly and 17 243 032.08 MXN annually. The monthly amount is achieved by considering 152 609 domestic water supplies in the city of Xalapa (SIEGVER, 2020), the positive response of 92.04 % of the population and a monthly contribution of 10.23 MXN which is the average WTP of the respondents.

If the annual potential of 17 243 032.08 MXN for the Payment for Hydrological Environmental Services (PHES) were combined with concurrent funds from the National Forestry Commission (CONAFOR), whose operability consists of contributing a similar amount, and considering a payment of 2 000.00 MXN∙ha-1∙yr-1, all the forested areas of the Pixquiac sub-basin could be conserved. This amount would exceed the payment of 1 200.00 MXN∙ha-1∙yr-1 allocated by federal entities such as CONAFOR (Secretaría de Gobernación [SEGOB], 2022).

About a third of the respondents (31.86 %) prefer to grant the monetary contribution directly to the owners of the forests; 21.24 % mentioned that through working groups represented by the same inhabitants of the upper parts of the region; 15.04 % believe that it should be carried out through civil associations; 13.27 % determined that the optimal method should be the water bill and, finally, 10.62 % mentioned that it should be through other government institutions.

The preference for making the payment available directly to the owners of forest lands coincides with Talero-Cabrejo and Salcedo-Silva (2020), who consider that the resource would be better used and would arrive in full; in addition, transaction costs would be reduced. In turn, Luna (2018) mentions that society has the perception that the government is not entirely transparent in the management of economic resources so there is distrust to use it as a channel for payment of the WTP, coinciding with that found in this study.

Aguilar et al. (2018) mentioned that gender and marital status are significant characteristics in relation to WTP, in contrast to the results in this study since these variables were not significant. On the other hand, Taye et al. (2018) and Khan et al. (2019) agreed that the variables with the highest significance in the econometric model are income, people's perception regarding the amount of water available over time, and the fee paid monthly for the service. Regarding educational level, the significance in the model is not as high as reported by Aguilar et al. (2018), who mention that the main determinant variables in WTP are age, educational level and income.

Although the population is willing to make an economic contribution to the conservation of forest areas that capture water, it is necessary to generate the HES market. Therefore, it is necessary to establish an institutional framework for the project in which the three levels of government, together with the actors and representatives involved (forest owners, consumers, non-governmental organizations and research institutions), establish the regulatory and operational bases for the HES market through a fund similar to the Mexican Forestry Fund.

When creating the HES market, transparent mechanisms should be defined to channel the resource in an effective and efficient manner; however, operationally, this may not be as profitable since it requires additional economic resources to be allocated for its creation. However, a viable alternative is to adapt governmental mechanisms to achieve efficiency and make management more transparent. There are successful cases such as FIDECOAGUA (Fideicomiso Coatepecano para la Conservación del Bosque y el Agua) in Coatepec, whose administration of contributions is managed by the municipal government (Nava-López et al., 2018), but made transparent through a trust integrated by all stakeholders.

The results have crucial relevance in assigning a value to the conservation of forest areas as providers of HES. In the study area, the level of participation in the WTP for the provision of HES is 92.04 %. This percentage is higher than that reported by Ramos-Alvarez et al. (2021), who mention that in Hidalgo there is a WTP of 68 %. The high percentage of WTP participation may be mainly due to the fact that in the state of Veracruz there are campaigns on the importance of forest care and its relationship with water supply (Córdoba et al., 2021). Also due to the influence of the creation of the first PHES market in the municipality of Coatepec, which is still in force and has shown that, through proper land management and the contribution of economic resources for the conservation of forest ecosystems, the water supply is guaranteed (Von Thaden et al., 2021).

Finally, the research only considered the provision of water for domestic use as the only environmental service provided by forest areas, so that in future research it is suggested to consider the other uses of water and, in addition, the multiple benefits in the provision of environmental services. This would help to include and analyze the benefits of natural resources related to the level of knowledge and awareness of end users but focused on the economic valuation of forests and their WTP for the enjoyment of all these benefits.

Conclusions

There is a potential willingness to pay 1 434 919.34 MXN per month by users of domestic water service in Xalapa, Veracruz. It is important to link the efforts of different local actors, including businesses and industrial, tourist and agricultural users, to improve the quality of the service by proposing actions to improve the catchment areas, such as the hydrological sub-basins. This study lays the foundations and tools for decision-makers to redirect and enrich public policies to improve the capture and application of resources to forest conservation areas in water recharge zones. There are programs for these areas, but the resources are not adequate to cover the forest cover of the region, which represents an area of opportunity for programs that allow contributions and their direct and transparent channeling to forest landowners with a specific focus on the active conservation of ecosystems.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the funding provided by the CONACYT 000104 scholarship program and the Colegio de Postgraduados.

References

Aguilar, F. X., Obeng, E. A., & Cai, Z. (2018). Water quality improvements elicit consistent willingness-to-pay for the enhancement of forested watershed ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services, 30(A), 158‒171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.02.012 [ Links ]

Arroyo-Rodríguez, V., Moreno, C. E., & Galán-Acevedo, C. (2017). La ecología del paisaje en México: Logros, desafíos y oportunidades en las ciencias biológicas. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad, 88, 42‒51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmb.2017.10.004 [ Links ]

Bergstrom, J. C., & Loomis, J. B. (2017). Economic valuation of river restoration: An analysis of the valuation literature and its uses in decision-making. Water Resources and Economics, 17, 9‒19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wre.2016.12.001 [ Links ]

Bleeker, S., & Vos, J. (2019). Payment for ecosystem services in Lima’s watersheds: power and imaginaries in an urban-rural hydrosocial territory. Water International, 44(2), 224‒242. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2019.1558809 [ Links ]

Börner, J., Schulz, D., Wunder, S., & Pfaff, A. (2020). The effectiveness of forest conservation policies and programs. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 12(1), 45‒64. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-110119-025703 [ Links ]

Carrie, R. H., Stringer, L. C., Van Hue, L. T., Hong, N., Van Tan, D., Hackney, C. R., Thanh, N. P. T., & Quinn, C. H. (2022). Social differences in spatial perspectives about local benefits from rehabilitated mangroves: insights from Vietnam. Ecosystems and People, 18(1), 378‒396. https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2022.2083237 [ Links ]

Chu, X., Zhan, J., Wang, C., Hameeda, S., & Wang, X. (2020). Households’ willingness to accept improved ecosystem services and influencing factors: Application of Contingent Valuation Method in Bashang Plateau, Hebei Province, China. Journal of Environmental Management, 255, 109925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109925 [ Links ]

Clarke, B., Thet, A. K., Sandhu, H., & Dittmann, S. (2021). Integrating cultural ecosystem services valuation into coastal wetlands restoration: A case study from South Australia. Environmental Science & Policy, 116, 220‒229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.11.014 [ Links ]

Comisión Municipal de Agua Potable y Saneamiento (CMAS). (2021). Tarifas del mes de Noviembre (P11/2021). https://cmasxalapa.gob.mx/pdf/tarifas/tarifas_11_2021.pdfLinks ]

Córdoba, D., Pischke, E. C., Selfa, T., Jones, K. W., & Avila-Foucat, S. (2021). When payment for ecosystem services meets culture: A culture theory perspective. Society & Natural Resources, 34(4), 505‒523. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2020.1849482 [ Links ]

Cristeche, E., & Penna, J. A. (2008). Métodos de valoración económica de los servicios ambientales. Estudios Socioeconómicos de la Sustentabilidad de los Sistemas de Producción y Recursos Naturales, 3. https://inta.gob.ar/sites/default/files/script-tmp-metodos_doc_03.pdfLinks ]

Cummings, R. G., Brookshire, D. S., & Schulze, W. D. (1986). Valuing environmental goods: a state of the arts assessment of the contingent valuation method. Roweman and Allanheld. [ Links ]

Desta, Y. (2018). Analysis of economic value of Lake Ziway: An application of contingent valuation method. Journal of Resources Development and Management, 40, 55‒66. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3373333Links ]

Dib, V., Nalon, M. A., Tavares Amazonas, N., Yuri Vidal, C., Ortiz-Rodríguez, I. A., Daněk, J., Formis de Oliveira, M., Alberti, P., Aparecida Da Silva, R., Salomão Precinoto, R., & Figueiredo Gomes, T. (2020). Drivers of change in biodiversity and ecosystem services in the Cantareira System Protected Area: A prospective analysis of the implementation of public policies. Biota Neotropica, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1590/1676-0611-BN-2019-0915 [ Links ]

Diswandi, D., Fadliyanti, L., Afifi, M., & Hailuddin, H. (2021). Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research vol. 556. Proceedings of the 2nd Annual Conference on Education and Social Science (ACCESS 2020). Tourism enterprises’ willingness to contribute to Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) program in Gili Matra, Indonesia (pp. 418-421). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210525.119 [ Links ]

García-Cool, I. (2019). Estrategia para la gestión integrada del recurso hídrico de Xalapa. https://ayuntamiento.xalapa.gob.mx/documents/39684/3222173/27-02_GIRH.pdf/22e46337-d20f-c4f5-2a26-7acaec0d9a9bLinks ]

Girma, H., Hugé, J., Gebrehiwot, M., & Van Passel, S. (2021). Farmers’ willingness to contribute to the restoration of an Ethiopian Rift Valley Lake: a contingent valuation study. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23(7), 10646-10665. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-01076-3 [ Links ]

Gupta, A. C., & Chatterjee, N. (2021). Economic values for the environment with special reference to the Contingent Valuation Method. In P. K. Sikdar (Ed.), Environmental management: Issues and concerns in developing countries (pp. 303-321). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62529-0_14 [ Links ]

Hanemann, M. (1984). Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with responses. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 66(3), 322-341. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/1240800 [ Links ]

Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (INEGI). (2019). Agua potable y drenaje. Nivel de disponibilidad de agua renovable por habitante. Subdirección General de Administración del Agua. http://cuentame.inegi.org.mx/territorio/agua/dispon.aspx?tema=TLinks ]

Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (INEGI). (2020). Censo de población y vivienda 2020. https://www.inegi.org.mx/programas/ccpv/2020/default.htmlLinks ]

Irawan, E. (2019). Contingent valuation of Lake Rawapening as a source raw drinking Water. Jurnal Ilmu Lingkungan, 17(3), 492-499. https://doi.org/10.14710/jil.17.3.492-499 [ Links ]

Izko, X., & Burneo, D. (2003). Herramientas para la valoración y manejo forestal sostenible de los bosques Sudamericanos. UICN-Sur. https://portals.iucn.org/library/sites/library/files/documents/2003-008.pdfLinks ]

Khan, I., Lei, H., Ali, G., Ali, S., & Zhao, M. (2019). Public attitudes, preferences and willingness to pay for river ecosystem services. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(19), 3707. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16193707 [ Links ]

Ko, H., & Son, Y. (2018). Perceptions of cultural ecosystem services in urban green spaces: A case study in Gwacheon, Republic of Korea. Ecological Indicators, 91, 299-306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.04.006 [ Links ]

Leija, E. G., & Mendoza, M. E. (2021). Estudios de conectividad del paisaje en América Latina: retos de investigación. Madera y Bosques, 7(1), https://doi.org/10.21829/myb.2021.2712032 [ Links ]

Liu, Z., & Kontoleon, A. (2018). Meta-analysis of livelihood impacts of payments for environmental services programmes in developing countries. Ecological Economics, 149, 48-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.02.008 [ Links ]

Luna, C. V. (2018). Esquemas de compensación y pago por servicios ambientales de los bosques nativos: Revisión de casos y marco legal en Argentina. Revista de Investigación Agraria y Ambiental, 9(2), 319-336. https://doi.org/10.22490/21456453.2278 [ Links ]

Martínez-Austria, P. F., Díaz-Delgado, C., & Moeller-Chavez, G. (2019). Seguridad hídrica en México: Diagnóstico general y desafíos principales. Ingeniería del Agua, 23(2), 107-121. https://doi.org/10.4995/ia.2019.10502 [ Links ]

Mitchell, R. C., & Carson, R. T. (1989). Using surveys to value public goods: the contingency valuation method. RFF Press. [ Links ]

Monroy Hernández, J. (2020). Análisis del paisaje de la microcuenca del río Fucha en la ciudad de Bogotá, Colombia. Diagnóstico para el mejoramiento de servicios ecosistémicos. Investigaciones Geográficas, (101), e59831. https://doi.org/10.14350/rig.59831 [ Links ]

Montesinos-López, O. (2010). Muestreo estadístico: Tamaño de muestra y estimación de parámetros. Universidad de Colima. [ Links ]

Nava-López, M., Selfa, T. L., Cordoba, D., Pischke, E. C., Torrez, D., Ávila-Foucat, S., Halvorsen, K. E., & Maganda, C. (2018). Decentralizing payments for hydrological services programs in Veracruz, Mexico: Challenges and implications for long-term sustainability. Society & Natural Resources, 31(12), 1389-1399. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2018.1463420 [ Links ]

Navrud, S., & Strand, J. (2018). Valuing global ecosystem services: what do European experts say? Applying the Delphi Method to Contingent Valuation of the Amazon Rainforest. Environmental and Resource Economics, 70, 249-269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-017-0119-6. [ Links ]

Pereira, P., Bogunovic, I., Muñoz-Rojas, M., & Brevik, E. C. (2018). Soil ecosystem services, sustainability, valuation and management. Current Opinion in Environmental Science & Health, 5, 7-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coesh.2017.12.003. [ Links ]

Perni, Á., Barreiro-Hurlé, J., & Martínez-Paz, J. M. (2021). Contingent valuation estimates for environmental goods: Validity and reliability. Ecological Economics, 189, 107144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107144 [ Links ]

Ramos-Álvarez, M. de J., Larqué-Saavedra, B. S., Hernández-Ortíz, J., Monroy-Hernández, R., & Hernández-Álvarez, Z. (2021). Valoración económica para la conservación del bosque de la cuenca de Tecocomulco, Hidalgo. Revista Iberoamericana de Bioeconomía y Cambio Climático, 7(13), 1558-1575. https://doi.org/10.5377/ribcc.v7i13.11421 [ Links ]

Randall, A., Ives, B. C., & Eastman, C. (1974). Bidding games for valuation of aesthetic environmental improvements. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1(2), 132-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/0095-0696(74)90010-2 [ Links ]

Resende, F. M., Fernandes, G. W., Andrade, D. C., & Néder, H. D. (2017). Economic valuation of the ecosystem services provided by a protected area in the Brazilian Cerrado: application of the contingent valuation method. Brazilian Journal of Biology, 77(4), 762-773. https://doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.21215 [ Links ]

Secretaría de Gobernación (SEGOB). (2022). Reglas de Operación 2023 del Programa Desarrollo Forestal Sustentable para el Bienestar. https://dof.gob.mx/nota_detalle.php?codigo=5676155&fecha=29/12/2022#gsc.tab=0Links ]

Sistema de Información Estadística y Geográfica del estado de Veracruz de Ignacio de la Llave (SIEGVER). (2020). Cuadernillos municipales Xalapa. http://ceieg.veracruz.gob.mx/2020/12/03/cuadernillos-municipales-2020/Links ]

Talero-Cabrejo, S., & Salcedo-Silva, E. M. (2020). Aportes para el diseño de esquemas de pagos por servicios ambientales en la cuenca del lago de Tota, Colombia. Apuntes del Cenes, 39(69), 269-298. https://doi.org/10.19053 [ Links ]

Taye, F. A., Vedel, S. E., & Jacobsen, J. B. (2018). Accounting for environmental attitude to explain variations in willingness to pay for forest ecosystem services using the new environmental paradigm. Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, 7(4), 420-440. https://doi.org/10.1080/21606544.2018.1467346 [ Links ]

Tinch, R., Beaumont, N., Sunderland, T., Ozdemiroglu, E., Barton, D., Bowe, C., Börger, T., Burgess, P., Nigel Cooper, C., Faccioli, M., Filler, P., Gkolemi, I., Kumar, R., Longo, A., McVittie, A., Morris, J., Park, J., Ravenscroft, N., Schaafsma, M., … Ziv, G. (2019). Economic valuation of ecosystem goods and services: a review for decision makers. Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, 8(4), 359-378. https://doi.org/10.1080/21606544.2019.1623083 [ Links ]

Thapa, S., Shrestha, S., Adhikari, R. K., Bhattarai, S., Paudel, D., Gautam, D., & Koirala, A. (2021). Residents’ willingness-to-pay for watershed conservation program facilitating ecosystem services in Begnas watershed, Nepal. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24, 7811-7832. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01759-5 [ Links ]

Wang, P., Poe, G. L., & Wolf, S. A. (2017). Payments for ecosystem services and wealth distribution. Ecological Economics, 132, 63-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.10.009 [ Links ]

Von-Thaden, J., Manson, R. H., Congalton, R. G., López-Barrera, F., & Jones, K. W. (2021). Evaluating the environmental effectiveness of payments for hydrological services in Veracruz, México: A landscape approach. Land Use Policy, 100, 105055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105055 [ Links ]

Zavaleta, E., León, C., Leiva, F., Gil, L., Rodríguez, A., & Bardales, C. (2020). Valoración económica del servicio ambiental hídrico del Santuario Nacional de Calipuy. Arnaldoa, 27(1), 335-350. http://doi.org/10.22497/arnaldoa.271.27121 [ Links ]

Received: April 04, 2022; Accepted: March 01, 2023

*Corresponding author: manuelg@colpos.mx; tel.: +52 595 952 0200 ext. 1464.

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License