SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.28 número1Anatomía de la madera de Magnolia rzedowskiana Vázquez, Domínguez & Pedraza, especie endémica de la Sierra Madre Oriental, México índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Revista Chapingo serie ciencias forestales y del ambiente

versión On-line ISSN 2007-4018versión impresa ISSN 2007-3828

Rev. Chapingo ser. cienc. for. ambient vol.28 no.1 Chapingo ene./abr. 2022  Epub 02-Feb-2024

https://doi.org/10.5154/r.rchscfa.2021.07.046 

Scientific articles

Yield and vivipary of pecan nut (Carya illinoinensis [Wangenh.] K. Koch) in relation to soil moisture

Mayela Rodríguez-González1 

Jesús G. Arreola-Ávila1  * 

Ricardo Trejo-Calzada1 

José A. Cueto-Wong2 

Jorge A. Zegbe-Domínguez3 

Isidro Reyes-Juárez2 

Luis G. Yáñez-Chávez1 

Amparo Borja-de la Rosa4 

1 Universidad Autónoma Chapingo, Unidad Regional Universitaria de Zonas Áridas. Carretera Gómez Palacio-Ciudad Juárez, km 40. C. P. 35230. Bermejillo, Durango, México.

2 Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales Agrícolas y Pecuarias, Campo Experimental La Laguna. Bulevar José Santos Valdez núm. 1200, col. Centro. C. P. 27440. Matamoros, Coahuila, México.

3 Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales Agrícolas, Campo Experimental Zacatecas. Carretera Zacatecas-Fresnillo km 24.5. C. P. 98500. Calera de Víctor Rosales, Zacatecas, México.

4 Universidad Autónoma Chapingo, División de Ciencias Forestales. Carretera México-Texcoco km 38.5. C. P. 56230. Texcoco, Estado de México, México.


Abstract

Introduction:

Viviparity in pecan nut (Carya illinoinensis [Wangenh.] K. Koch) has increased considerably. This genetic-environmental phenomenon can be controlled with soil moisture management and other quality variables.

Objective:

To determine the effect of soil moisture content on yield, nut size, kernel percentage and germinated nut on the tree.

Materials and methods:

Forty-year-old pecan nut trees were irrigated by 40 emitters with an output of 3.2 L∙h-1. From the phenological stage of shell hardening, irrigation time was 4, 6 and 8 h, corresponding to moisture levels of 0.257, 0.327 and 0.380 m3 of water per m3 of soil, at depths of 40 to 80 cm. Yield per tree, germinated nut percentage, fruit size and kernel percentage were evaluated during the production cycles of 2016 and 2017 production cycles.

Results and discussion:

During the two production cycles, when soil moisture level increased from 0.257 to 0.380 m3∙m-3, nut yield per tree, fruit length and diameter, and kernel percentage increased on average 23.8 %, 25.3 and 10 %, and 1.8 %, respectively; however, vivipary increased 11.2 %, which was reflected in the decrease of commercial pecan nut percentage. Treatments 0.327 and 0.380 m3∙m-3 had a similar effect (P > 0.05) on these variables.

Conclusions:

The lower moisture level (0.257 m3∙m-3), starting at the kernel filling stage, decreased vivipary and increased commercial kernel percentage.

Keywords: nut; Western variety; premature germination, fruit size, kernel percentage

Resumen

Introducción:

La viviparidad en nogal pecanero (Carya illinoinensis [Wangenh.] K. Koch) ha incrementado considerablemente. Este fenómeno genético-ambiental puede ser controlado con el manejo de humedad del suelo y otras variables de calidad.

Objetivo:

Determinar el efecto del contenido de humedad del suelo sobre el rendimiento, tamaño de nuez, porcentaje de almendra y nuez germinada en el árbol.

Materiales y métodos:

Árboles de nogal de 40 años fueron regados por 40 emisores con gasto de 3.2 L∙h-1. A partir de la etapa fenológica de endurecimiento de cáscara, el tiempo de riego fue de 4, 6 y 8 h, correspondientes a niveles de humedad de 0.257, 0.327 y 0.380 m3 de agua por m3 de suelo, a profundidad de 40 a 80 cm. El rendimiento por árbol, porcentaje de nuez germinada, tamaño de fruto y porcentaje de almendra se evaluaron durante los ciclos productivos 2016 y 2017.

Resultados y discusión:

Durante los dos ciclos de producción, cuando el nivel de humedad en el suelo aumentó de 0.257 a 0.380 m3∙m-3, la producción de nuez por árbol, la longitud y diámetro del fruto, y el porcentaje de almendra incrementaron en promedio 23.8 %, 25.3 y 10 %, y 1.8 %, respectivamente; sin embargo, la viviparidad incrementó 11.2 %, lo cual se vio reflejado en la disminución del porcentaje de nuez comercial. Los tratamientos 0.327 y 0.380 m3∙m-3 tuvieron un efecto similar (P > 0.05) en dichas variables.

Conclusiones:

El menor nivel de humedad (0.257 m3∙m-3), a partir del llenado de almendra, disminuyó la viviparidad y aumentó el porcentaje de nuez comercial.

Palabras clave: nuez; variedad Western; germinación prematura, tamaño de fruto, porcentaje de almendra

Highlights:

  1. Three moisture levels (0.257, 0.327 and 0.380 m3 of water per m3 of soil) were evaluated in pecan nut.

  2. Increasing soil moisture decreased the percentage of commercial pecan nut by 11 %.

  3. Higher soil moisture increased 11 % of germinated nut production on the tree.

  4. Fruit size and kernel percentage increased as soil moisture increased.

Introduction

Vivipary or premature nut germination is a phenomenon that involves embryo growth during fruit ripening while the fruit is still on the tree (Wood, 2015). This recurrent phenomenon has manifested considerably both in native trees growing in spontaneous populations (Sparks, 2005) and in commercial orchards (Leon, 2014). Vivipary is the result of a genetic-environmental effect (Wells, 2017) related to hormone content (Wood, 2015), warm autumn temperatures (León, 2014) and high soil moisture content (Godoy & López, 2000; Thompson, 2005), prior to the onset of the husk opening or nut maturity.

The degree of premature germination is also related to variety susceptibility (Wells, 2017). Wichita, Mahan, Shawnee, and Cheyenne are highly susceptible varieties; Western has a moderate degree and others such as Caddo and Sioux have low susceptibility (Aguilar et al., 2015). The regions with the highest incidence of sprouted nuts include the Hermosillo coast, with 31 % for the Wichita variety and 27 % for the Western variety (García-Moreno, Báez-Sañudo, Mercado-Ruiz, García-Robles, & Núñez-Moreno, 2020). The north region of Coahuila, Comarca Lagunera and some areas of Nuevo León and Tamaulipas (Aguilar et al., 2015) have the same problem. This phenomenon also occurs in the producing states of the southeastern United States with germination exceeding 50 % (Ou et al., 1994; Smith, 2012).

Premature nut germination increases when temperatures are 30 to 35 °C during September and October, which coincides with nut maturation and husk opening (León, 2014; Thompson, 2005). Vivipary increases in years of high production, which is closely related to soil moisture (Garrot, Kilbby, Fangmeier, Husman, & Ralowics, 1993; Sparks, Reid, Yates, Smith, & Stevenson, 1995; Wood, 2015) and duration of the period in which the nuts remain on the tree before being harvested (Stein, 1985).

Many crops exhibit vivipary (Farnsworth, 2000), although the problem is found in pecan nut (Carya illinoinensis [Wangenh.] K. Koch) it is not found in other nut-producing species (Cohen et al., 1997; Wood, 2015). For this species, evidence indicates that predisposition of nuts to germinate is due to a low concentration of abscisic acid (León, 2014) and its interaction with gibberellins (León, 2014; White, Proebsting, Hedden, & Rivin, 2000). When there is no moisture loss in the husk, the seed will continue its development and germinate on the tree before being harvested (Wells, 2017). If high soil moisture induces vivipary, then decreased moisture content could reduce nut germination on the tree; however, its efficacy needs to be studied and tested. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of soil moisture content on C. illinoinensis yield, premature nut germination, fruit size and kernel content in pecan nut during the production cycles of 2016 and 2017.

Materials and Methods

Description of the study area

The study was conducted on 40-year-old pecan nut trees, Western variety, from July to October 2016 and 2017. The trees are located in the municipality of Viesca, Coahuila, Mexico, with geographical coordinates of 25° 20’ 28’’ N and 102° 10’ and 48º 16’ 16' W, and altitude of 1 100 m. The climate is BWhw (e) type, which is interpreted as very arid, semi-warm with rainfall in summer and extreme thermal amplitude with an average annual temperature between 18 and 22 °C. Average annual precipitation ranging between 200 and 300 mm, with rainfall from April to November and scarce rainfall during the rest of the year (Servicio Meteorológico Nacional [SMN], 2010). Soil has a clay loam texture, with a field capacity of 0.35 m3∙m-3 (water content weight values, calculated at water/soil volume) and permanent wilting point of 0.19 m3∙m-3. Spacing between trees is 12 m x 12 m and trees are planted under a true frame design. The irrigation system is drip irrigation with two lines on each side of the tree placed 2 and 3 m from the trunk at a 40 cm depth.

Experimental units and treatments

Representative trees were selected from the orchard with an average trunk circumference of 90 cm, measured at 60 cm from the ground, with an approximate height of 15 m and a leaf density of 3.5 m2∙m-3. Each tree was irrigated with 40 emitters with an expense of 3.2 L∙h-1. Irrigations of 3.5 h per day started in March, during the bud break phenological stage. Irrigation time increased as the season progressed, up to 6 h per day. In the phenological stage of kernel filling, irrigation time was 4, 6 and 8 h in three irrigation sections, respectively to establish moisture levels (treatments) of 0.257, 0.327 and 0.380 m3 of water per m3 of soil. The sampling units (three trees) were selected in the middle part of each irrigation section, which included 50 trees respectively, regarding the criteria suggested by Prodan (1968) for sampling tree species. The soil moisture level was recorded based on volumetric water content, expressed in cubic meters of water per cubic meter of soil, at a depth of 80 cm, where each moisture sensor was placed. Sensors were type capacitive (EC-5 DECAGON DEVICES Inc., Pullman WA, USA) duly calibrated, which measure the dielectric constant of soil, attached to a datalogger (Em50 DECAGON DEVICES Inc., Pullman WA, USA) to record the readings, which were subsequently correlated with moisture content. The recording was done daily, and data were stored in spreadsheet format file, from July to October 2016 and 2017.

Response variables and statistical analysis

Variables evaluated were nut production (kg) per tree at the time of harvest, which was carried out with mechanical vibrator on September 11 and 16, 2016 and 2017, respectively; fruit size, expressed in length and diameter, measured with vernier in a sample of 50 nuts per tree; percentage of germinated nut and commercial nut derived from the quotient of the number of nuts for each condition (n) and the total of collected nuts (N), multiplied by 100; kernel percentage from a sample of 20 nuts per tree, which were broken with a nutcracker and the kernel was separated from the shell. The weight (g) of the kernel was divided by the total weight of the sample and multiplied by 100. The experimental design was completely randomized in repeated measures over time; the study factor corresponded to the available soil moisture content (0.380, 0.327 and 0.257 m3∙m-3). The experimental unit was an individual tree. The normal distribution of the data was analyzed using the Shapiro-Wilk test; then, an ANOVA test was carried out to determine the significance of treatments and Tukey's test (P ≤ 0.05) for mean difference. For this purpose, SAS version 9.0 (SAS Institute, 2002) and Microsoft Excel version 2013 were used.

Results

Soil moisture dynamics

Figure 1 shows the behavior of soil moisture under three volumetric water contents, at 80 cm soil depth from July to October 2016. The soil irrigated with 0.380 m3∙m-3 had higher water moisture than at field capacity (FC), starting from the phenological stage of husk hardening occurring in the last week of July (Figure 1). Moisture content in this treatment showed no saturation values during the season; however, at the end of September higher water content was observed. The area irrigated with 0.327 m3∙m-3, which corresponded to the irrigation applied by the producer, kept available moisture close to field capacity during July and August; starting in September, it decreased as the (0.257 m3∙m-3) had the lowest values during the season and decreased from September onwards, as in the treatment of 0.327 m3∙m-3.

Figure 1 Soil moisture dynamics under three volumetric water contents at a depth of 80 cm in pecan nut (Carya illinoinensis) during the production cycle of 2016. FC: field capacity, PWP: permanent wilting point. 

In 2017, moisture curves similar to those of 2016 were observed. Accumulated precipitation in 2016 was 352 mm; the amount of water recorded was 114 mm from January to June and 238 mm from July to October. In 2017, the amount of accumulated water was 200 mm, much lower than in 2016, with a record of 26 mm from January to June and 131 mm from July to September, while the rest, equivalent to 43 mm, was recorded in December.

Pecan nut yield

According to Table 1, treatments with higher moisture increased nut yield per tree (P ≤ 0.05). This result was mainly due to the increase in nut size and higher kernel percentage, but not due to the number of nuts. In 2016, considered a productive year, the increase was 12.7 % when soil moisture level increased from 0.257 to 0.327 m3∙m-3, and 24.1 % when it increased to 0.380 m3∙m-3. A similar response was reported in 2017, in which lower production was observed due to alternation that is common in this species. Production per tree increased 12.7 % when available soil moisture increased from 0.257 to 0.327 m3∙m-3, and 23.6 % in trees with the highest available moisture.

Table 1 Total commercial nut production per pecan tree (Carya illinoinensis), under three volumetric water contents, during two productive cycles. 

Soil moisture (m3∙m-3) Total production (kg∙tree-1)
2016 2017
0.38 21.46 ± 2.57 a 19.83 ± 1.67 a
0.327 19.48 ± 2.95 ab 18.08 ± 2.63 ab
0.257 17.29 ± 6.72 b 16.04 ± 3.29 b

± Standard deviation of the mean (n = 3). In each cycle, mean values followed by the same letter are not significantly different from each other according to the Tukey's test (P = 0.05).

Premature germination of pecan nut

In the two production cycles (2016 and 2017), prematurely germinated nut production in trees (Figure 2) increased significantly (P < 0.05) under moisture contents of 0.327 m3∙m-3 and 0.380 m3∙m-3. According to Table 2, in 2016, trees with higher soil moisture had 12 % more germinated nut production than trees with the lowest level. In 2017, from the shell hardening stage (late July) to the end of the production cycle, the highest soil moisture level caused significant increase (P < 0.05) of 10.5 % of germinated nut. The increase in vivipary negatively affected the percentage of commercial nut (Table 2); therefore, the soil moisture level of 0.257 m3∙m-3 proved to be the most effective in decreasing vivipary without affecting the percentage of commercial nut.

Figure 2 Germinated pecan nut inside Carya illinoinensis husk, showing radicle during ripening period (A) and harvested nut (B). 

Table 2 Prematurely germinated nut and commercial nut of Carya illinoinensis according to available soil moisture during two production cycles. 

Soil moisture (m3∙m-3) Year 2016 Year 2017
Germinated nut (%) Commercial nut (%) Germinated nut (%) Commercial nut (%)
0.38 17.4 ± 3.3 a 82.6 ± 3.8 a 14.6 ± 1.4 a 85.4 ± 4.7 a
0.327 14.2 ± 0.9 a 85.8 ± 4.1 a 12.8 ± 3.2 a 87.2 ± 5.9 a
0.257 5.2 ± 1.4 b 94.8 ± 6.9 b 4.1 ± 2.3 b 95.9 ± 7.6 b
CV (%) 8.7 20.2 7.2 17.4

± Standard deviation of the mean (n = 3). In each column, mean values followed by the same letter are not significantly different from each other according to the Tukey's test (P = 0.05).

Fruit size

In the production cycle of 2016, fruit length and diameter increased significantly (P < 0.05) in trees with the two higher moisture levels (Table 3). In this cycle, the year of highest production, nut length and diameter in trees with higher moisture content (0.38 m3∙m-3) were 30 % and 12 % greater than in trees subjected to lower moisture levels. A similar effect was observed in 2017; the treatment with the lowest soil moisture content (0.257 m3∙m-3) caused a 1.0 cm (20.6 %) and 0.23 cm (8 %) reduction in fruit length and diameter, respectively, in relation to the high moisture level. From fruit hardening, final length and diameter at harvest were reduced in trees with lower water supply.

Table 3 Pecan nut (Carya illinoinensis) length and diameter according to three soil moisture contents during two production cycles. 

Soil moisture(m3∙m-3) Year 2016 Year 2017
Fruit length (cm) Fruit diameter (cm) Fruit length (cm) Fruit diameter (cm)
0.38 5.07 ± 0.22 a 2.90 ± 0.24 a 5.17 ± 0.18 a 2.90 ± 0.19 a
0.327 4.93 ± 0.24 a 2.81 ± 0.26 a 4.95 ± 0.2 a 2.85 ± 0.17 a
0.257 3.89 ± 0.27 b 2.58 ± 0.18 b 4.16 ± 0.32 b 2.67 ± 0.22 b
CV (%) 4.69 7.54 8.54 5.61

± Standard deviation of the mean (n = 50). In each column, mean values followed by the same letter are not significantly different from each other according to the Tukey's test (P = 0.05).

Kernel percentage

Table 4 indicates that, in 2016, kernel percentage increased significantly (P < 0.05) in treatments with higher soil moisture; kernel percentages were 1.95 and 0.62 % higher than in pecan nut0 trees subjected to lower moisture levels. In 2017, moisture treatments had a similar effect on this variable; soil moisture level of 0.257 m3∙m-3 had the lowest kernel percentage, which was exceeded by 0.58 and 1.82 percentage points because of trees with moisture levels of 0.327 and 0.380 m3∙m-3, respectively.

Table 4 Kernel percentage under three soil moisture levels in two pecan nut (Carya illinoinensis) production cycles. 

Soil moisture (m3∙m-3) Year 2016 Year 2017
Kernel (%) Kernel (%)
0.38 58.85 ± 3.50 a 58.82 ± 3.33 a
0.327 57.52 ± 1.50 ab 57.58 ± 2.87 ab
0.257 56.90 ± 1.28 b 57.00 ± 2.68 b

± Standard deviation of the mean (n = 3). In each column, mean values followed by the same letter are not significantly different from each other according to the Tukey's test (P = 0.05).

Discussion

Pecan nut yield

Adequate environmental conditions and proper management during pecan nut production cycle, particularly in each phenological phase, lead to good production (Reyes Vázquez & Morales Landa, 2019). Furthermore, available soil moisture (Grauke, Wood, & Harris, 2016; Thompson, 2005), related to the supply of fertilizations, is important for the tree to manifest its productive potential (Walworth, White, & Comeau, 2017). Therefore, it is essential to avoid water stress conditions, during the period of nut growth and kernel filling stage (Godoy & López, 2000). The results of the two years of evaluation indicate that the higher soil moisture level, from fruit shell hardening occurred at the end of July, had a positive effect on nut production per tree. This exceeded the average nut yield (1.1 t∙ha-1) in the Comarca Lagunera, reported by Santamaría, Medina Morales, Rivera-González, and Faz Contreras (2002), especially in the two treatments with higher moisture content. The increase in nut yield with increasing soil moisture has also been observed by Marco et al. (2021) and supports that established by Sparks (2005) regarding the high-water requirement of the species (Walls, 2017). It is concluded that high water requirement was inherited by its ancestors, which developed in river margins and deep and fertile soils (Babuin, Echeverría, Menedez, & Maiale 2016; Poletto, Poletto, Morales, Briao, Silveira, & Richards 2020). In this regard, Orona Castillo, Sangerman-Jarquín, Cervantes Vázquez, Espinoza Arellano, and Núñez Moreno (2019) determined that pecan nut yields per unit area, in pecan nut orchards in northern Mexico, are directly related to irrigation availability and technical attention. Regarding the above, it is possible to explain the low production in trees that had less water volume in the soil, reflected in the lower number of smaller fruits produced, as observed in other species (Wiegand & Swanson, 1982).

Premature germination of pecan nut

Several studies indicate there are a number of plants that exhibit vivipary (Duermeyer et al., 2018); however, there are few reports concerning this phenomenon in commercial fruiting species (Taylor, Kunene, & Pandor, 2020). Farnsworth (2000) suggests that vivipary is more common in plants with a particular morphological profile, including large seeds observed only in one fruit; seeds with hard endocarp surrounded by fleshy tissue that keep internal water content; species with directed dispersal (a strategy that allows them to reach specific habitats favorable for survival); species with long adult life spans, as well as, those that are less specialized for microhabitats; and those adapted to moist habitats. According to Wood (2015), vivipary is also favored by high fruit moisture, together with the presence of temperatures of 30 to 35 °C during the final stage of development and low concentration of abscisic acid. Since pecan nut has most of these characteristics, the probability of premature germination, even remaining on the tree, is high, when temperature and moisture conditions are favorable (Gonçalves Bilharva et al., 2018; Wood, 2015). The study region has an average maximum temperature of 33 °C and precipitation of 131 mm from July to September, conditions that can be conducive the occurrence of this phenomenon (Sifuentes-Ibarra et al., 2015).

Vivipary is considered a plant adaptation to take advantage of certain conditions to increase survival in the wild; in cultivated pecan nut trees, it is a cause of economic losses (Wood, 2015). The germination process uses stored carbohydrates for growth, and the process causes blackening of the region of the embryo that joins the two kernel sections; nuts with this characteristic are not marketable (Wood, 2015). Taylor et al. (2020) add that, in addition to the aforementioned conditions, tree vigor, light condition, and overfertilization in the late stages of nut development could be the factors leading to vivipary in C. illinoinensis.

In this study, the highest number of germinated nuts was observed in trees with higher soil moisture content. The trend toward greater vivipary as soil moisture levels increased confirms the results obtained by Godoy and López (2000), León (2014), and Wood (2015). Prior to ripening, nuts are not physiologically in dormancy, but are mechanically restricted to germinate (Wood, 2015). In this constraint, the nut shell, which appears to be a formidable barrier (Wells, 2017), provides no impediment to the transfer of water or gases required for germination. As a result, the high amount of moisture between nut shell and husk, related to high temperatures, could consequently be a factor that neutralizes the mechanical effect of the shell, allowing the nut to germinate prematurely, even when it still on the tree, as happens in some susceptible varieties under suitable climatic conditions (Aguilar et al., 2015). In 2016, the maximum, minimum, and mean temperatures in September were 32.7, 19.3, and 26 °C, respectively, and in October were 20.2, 16.2, and 23.3 °C. In 2017, the maximum, minimum and average temperatures in September were 32.4, 19.0 and 25.7 °C and in October were 30.2, 16.9 and 23.6 °C. The presence of temperatures above 30 °C during the nut ripening period, associated with high humidity, could have been an important factor on the induction of premature nut germination on the tree (García-Moreno et al., 2020; Nonogaki, Barrero, & Li, 2018).

On the other hand, the number of germinated nuts increases in years of high production (Sparks, 2005; Stein, 1985). In this study, the trend towards a higher presence of germinated nuts in 2016 (year of high production) was not evident in 2017, a year with lower production and vivipary.

Nut size and kernel percentage

Nut growth and kernel filling stage depend mainly on moisture content; therefore, its adequate availability in the soil is important, both in the first phase of development, which is characterized by nut growth, and during the second phase, which corresponds to the kernel filling stage (Ferreyra, Selles, & Lemus, 2002; Godoy & Huitrón, 1998; Godoy & López, 2000). Moisture stress during fruit growth leads to the production of small nuts (Godoy & Huitrón, 1998; Herrera, 1990). On the contrary, a water deficit during kernel filling stage induces a low kernel percentage (Herrera, 1990; Godoy & Huitrón, 1998). In the present study, nut size increased as moisture availability increased, without affecting kernel percentage, whose tendency to increase was greater in trees with better moisture conditions. Values for nut growth are similar to those reported by Marco et al. (2021), agreeing with the fact that the amount of water applied during the kernel filling stage influences fruit width and length, with significantly larger nuts as irrigation increases.

According to the USDA (United States Department of Agriculture, 2020), the average nut length is 36.8 mm and 25.07 mm wide. In this study, nut length and width values were greater than those referred to and increased in relation to water availability. Thus, during the kernel filling stage, when embryo development occurs, the size of walnut response to increased irrigation water is evident; however, vivipary increases and the percentage of commercial pecan nut decreases. The positive response toward larger size and higher kernel percentage in higher moisture treatments is not consistent with the assumption that pecan nuts fill better or produce better developed kernels (Thompson, 2005). In this study, kernel percentage ranged from 56 % to 58 % in the lower and higher moisture trees during the two production cycles. These records exceed the reference values for export (55 %) (Godoy & López, 2000). The kernel percentage is used in the pecan nut industry to determine the price per unit weight of pecan nuts in shell (Thompson, 2005). Also, it has been noted that high yields affect kernel percentage (Smith, 2012; Smith, Reid, Carroll, & Cheary, 1993). In this study, yield per tree, specifically in 2016, had no effect on kernel size and kernel percentage, which increased within the moisture levels evaluated.

Conclusions

The moisture content of 0.257 m3∙m-3 soil was the best treatment for reducing premature nut germination. The highest nut production per tree was reported for the 0.380 m3∙m-3 treatment; however, vivipary also increased and affected the percentage of commercial nut; irrigation applied by the producer (0.327 m3∙m-3) had the same effect on these variables. Therefore, this study proved that high soil moisture induces vivipary and that decreased irrigation could reduce this phenomenon.

References

Aguilar-Pérez, H., Arreola-Ávila, J. G., Morales-Olais, E., Cuéllar-Villarreal, E., Lagarda-Murrieta, A., Tarango-Rivero, H., …Lombardini, L. (2015). ‘Norteña’ Pecan. HortScience, 50(9), 1399-1400. doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI.50.9.1399 [ Links ]

Babuin, M. F., Echeverría, M., Menedez, A. B., & Maiale, S. J. (2016). Arbuscular mycorryhizal pecan seedlings alleviate effect of restricted water suly. HortScience, 5(3), 212-215. doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI.51.3.212 [ Links ]

Cohen, M., Valancogne, C., Dayau, S., Ameglio, T., Cruiziant., P., & Archer, P. (1997). Yield and physiological responses of walnut trees in semiarid conditions: application to irrigation scheduling. Acta de Horticultura, 449, 273-280. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.1997.449.39 [ Links ]

Duermeyer, L., Khodaanahi, E., Yan, D., Krapp, A., Rothstein, S. J., & Nambara, E. (2018). Regulation of seed dormancy and germination by nitrate. Seed Science Research, 28(3), 150-157. doi: 10.1017/S096025851800020X [ Links ]

Farnsworth, E. (2000). The ecology and physiology of viviparous and recalcitrant seeds. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 31, 107-138. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.107 [ Links ]

Ferreyra, E. R., Selles, V. G., & Lemus, S. G. (2002). Efecto del estrés hídrico durante la fase II de crecimiento del fruto del duraznero cv. Kakamas en el rendimiento y estado hídrico de las plantas. Agricultura Técnica, 62(4), 565-573. doi: 10.4067/S0365-28072002000400008 [ Links ]

García-Moreno, B. Y., Báez-Sañudo, R., Mercado-Ruiz, J. N., García-Robles, J. M., & Núñez-Moreno, J. H. (2020). Bioregulación de la germinación prematura de nuez pecanera mediante aplicaciones precosecha con ácido 2-hidroxibenzoico. Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnología Postcosecha, 21(2), 1-12. Retrieved from http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=81365122005Links ]

Garrot, D., Kilbby, M., Fangmeier, D., Husman, S., & Ralowics, A. (1993). Production, growth, and nut quality under water stress based on crop water stress index. Journal American Society for Horticultural Science, 118(6), 694-698. doi: 10.21273/JASHS.118.6.694 [ Links ]

Grauke, L. J., Wood, B. W., & Harris, M. K. (2016). Crop vulnerability: Carya. HortScience, 51(6), 653-663. doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI.51.6.653 [ Links ]

Godoy, A. C., & Huitrón, R. M. (1998). Relaciones hídricas de hojas y frutos de nogal pecanero durante el crecimiento y desarrollo de la nuez. Agrociencia, 32(4), 331-337. Retrieved from https://www.agrociencia-colpos.mx/index.php/agrociencia/article/view/1564Links ]

Godoy Avila, C., & López Montoya, I. (2000). Desarrollo de la almendra y germinación del fruto del nogal pecanero bajo cuatro calendarios de riego. Terra Latinoamericana, 18(4), 305-311. Retrieved from https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/573/57318404.pdfLinks ]

Gonçalves Bilharva, M., Roberto Martins, C., Janer Hamann, J., Fronza, D., De Marco, R. and Barbosa Malgarim, M. (2018). Pecan: from research to the Brazilian reality. Journal of Experimental Agriculture International, 23(6), 1-16. doi: 10.9734/JEAI/2018/41899 [ Links ]

Herrera, E. (1990). Fruit growth and development of Ideal and Western pecans. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 115(6), 915-923. [ Links ]

León, G. V. (2014). Ácido abscísico-giberelinas como indicador de viviparidad en nogal pecanero (Carya illinoinensis K.). Hermosillo, Sonora, México: CIAD. [ Links ]

Marco, R. D., Goldschmidt, R. J., Herter, F. G., Martins, C. R., Mello-Farias, P. C., & Uberti, A. (2021). The irrigation effect on nuts’ growth and yield of Carya illinoinensis. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias, 93(1), 1-8. doi: 10.1590/0001-3765202120181351 [ Links ]

Nonogaki, H., Barrero, J. M., & Li, C. (2018). Seed dormancy, germination, and pre-harvest sprouting. Frontiers in Plant Science, 9, 1783. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01783 [ Links ]

Orona Castillo, I., Sangerman-Jarquín, D. M., Cervantes Vázquez, M. G., Espinoza Arellano, J. de J., & Núñez Moreno, J. H. (2019). La producción y comercialización de nuez pecanera en México. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas, 10(8), 1797-1808. doi: 10.29312/remexca.v10i8.1833 [ Links ]

Ou, S. K., Storey, J. B., & Thompson, T. E. (1994). A northern pecan pollen source delays germination of nuts from a southern pecan cultivar. HortScience, 29(11), 1290-1291. doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI.29.11.1290 [ Links ]

Poletto, T., Poletto, I., Moraes Silva, L. M., Briao Muñiz, M. F., Silveira Reiniger, L. R., Richards, N., & Marco, S. V. (2020). Morphological, chemical and genetic analysis of southern Brazilian pecan (Carya illinoinensis) accessions. Acta Horticulturae, 261, 1-7 doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2019.108863 [ Links ]

Prodan, M. (1968). Forest bimetrics. Oxford, Inglaterra: Pergamon Pres. [ Links ]

Reyes Vázquez, N. C., & Morales Landa, J. L. (2019). Agronomía sustentable y aprovechamiento alternativo de la nuez. Agronomía sustentable y aprovechamiento alternativo de la nuez. México: Centro de Investigación y Asistencia en Tecnología y Diseño del Estado de Jalisco CIATEJ. Retrieved from http://ciatej.repositorioinstitucional.mx/jspui/handle/1023/671Links ]

Santamaría, J., Medina Morales, M. C., Rivera-González, M., & Faz Contreras, R. (2002). Algunos factores de suelo, agua y planta que afectan la producción y alternancia del nogal pecanero. Revista Fitotecnia Mexicana, 25(2), 119-125. Retrieved from https://www.revistafitotecniamexicana.org/documentos/25-2/1a.pdfLinks ]

SAS Institute. (2002). Statistical analysis system. The SAS system for Windows version 9.0. Cary, North Carolina, USA: Author. [ Links ]

Servicio Meteorológico Nacional (SMN). (2010). Normales climatológicas por estado. Retrieved from https://smn.conagua.gob.mx/es/climatologia/informacion-climatologica/normales-climatologicas-por-estadoLinks ]

Sifuentes-Ibarra, E., Samaniego-Gaxiola, J. A., Anaya-Salgado, A., Núñez-Moreno, J. H., Valdez-Gascón, B., Gutiérrez-Soto, R. G., … Macías-Cervantes, J. (2015). Programación del riego en nogal pecanero (Carya illinoinensis), mediante un modelo integral basado en tiempo térmico. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas, 6(8), 1893-1902. doi: 10.29312/remexca.v6i8.527 [ Links ]

Smith, M. W., Reid, W., Carroll, B., & Cheary, B. (1993). Mechanical fruit thinning influences fruit quality, yield, return fruit set, and cold injury of pecan. HortScience, 28(11), 1081-1084. doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI.28.11.1081 [ Links ]

Smith, M. W. (2012). Fruit production characteristics in ‘Pawnee’ Pecan. HortScience, 47(4), 489-496. doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI.47.4.489 [ Links ]

Sparks, D. (2005). Adaptability of pecan as a species. HortScience, 40(5), 1175-1189. doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI.40.5.1175 [ Links ]

Sparks, D., Reid, W., Yates, I., Smith, M. W., & Stevenson, T. G. (1995). Fruiting stress induces shuck decline and premature germination in pecan. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 120(1), 43-53. doi: 10.21273/JASHS.120.1.43 [ Links ]

Stein, L. A. (1985). The influence of fertilization, phloem restriction, irrigation, microbes, and ethephon on pecan shuck disorders in Texas (Ph. D. Diss.), Texas A&M University, Texas, USA. [ Links ]

Taylor, N., Kunene, S., & Pandor, M. (2020). Stick-tights and vivipary in pecans. Retrieved from https://www.sappa.za.org/wp-content/uploads/docs/2020/07/STICK-TIGHTS-AND-VIVIPARY-IN-PECANS_v3.pdfLinks ]

Thompson, T. E. (2005). Pecan fruit shuck thickness is related to nut quality. HortScience, 40(6), 1664-1666. doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI.40.6.1664 [ Links ]

United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). (2020). NCGR Pecan/Hickory Database (Pecan Cultivars). Retrieved from https://aggiehorticulture.tamu.edu/usda_pecan/plant_details.php?pid=Success&acno=518130Links ]

Walworth, J. L., White, S. A., & Comeau, M. (2017). Soil - applied Zn EDTA: vegetative growth, nut production, and nutrient acquisition of immature pecan trees grown in alkaline calcareous soils. HortScience, 2(2), 300-305. doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI11467-16 [ Links ]

Wells, L. (2017). Southeastern pecan growers' handbook. Georgia, USA: Cooperative Extension Service, University of Georgia College of Agricultural & Environmental Sciences. [ Links ]

White, C. N., Proebsting, W. M., Hedden, P., & Rivin, C. (2000). Gibberellins and seed development in maize. I. Evidence that gibberellin/abscisic acid balance governs germination versus maturation pathways. Plant Physiology, 122(4), 1081-1088. doi: 10.1104/pp.122.4.1081 [ Links ]

Wiegand, C., & Swanson, W. (1982). Citrus responses to irrigation: II Fruit yield, size and number. Journal of the Rio Grande Valley Horticultural Society, 35, 87-95. [ Links ]

Wood, B. (2015). Regulation of vivipary in pecan. Acta Horticulturae, 1070, 33-42. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2015.1070.3 [ Links ]

Received: July 11, 2021; Accepted: December 09, 2021

*Corresponding author: jgarreola@chapingo.uruza.edu.mx; tel.: +52 872 776 0190.

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License