SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.26 número3Enmiendas a suelos urbanos con carbohidratos para mejorar el establecimiento del arbolado índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Revista Chapingo serie ciencias forestales y del ambiente

versión On-line ISSN 2007-4018versión impresa ISSN 2007-3828

Rev. Chapingo ser. cienc. for. ambient vol.26 no.3 Chapingo sep./dic. 2020  Epub 25-Jun-2021

https://doi.org/10.5154/r.rchscfa.2019.11.080 

Scientific article

Mycorrhiza and fertilization: effect on the production of Pinus engelmannii Carr. in nursery

Silvia Salcido-Ruiz1 

José Á. Prieto-Ruíz2  * 

José L. García-Rodríguez3 

Enrique Santana-Aispuro4 

Jorge A. Chávez-Simental5 

1Universidad Juárez del Estado de Durango, Programa Institucional de Doctorado en Ciencias Agropecuarias y Forestales. Av. Río Papaloapan y bulevar Durango s/n, col. Valle del Sur. C. P. 34120, Durango, Durango, México.

2Universidad Juárez del Estado de Durango, Facultad de Ciencias Forestales. Av. Río Papaloapan y bulevar Durango s/n, Col. Valle del Sur. C. P. 34120. Durango, Durango, México.

3Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias (INIFAP), Centro de Investigación Norte-Centro (CIRNOC), Campo Experimental Valle del Guadiana (CEVAG). km 4.5 carretera Durango-El Mezquital. C. P. 34170, Durango, Durango., México.

4Secretaría de Recursos Naturales y Medio Ambiente del estado de Durango, vivero forestal Praxedis Guerrero. Av. Ferrocarril 109. C. P. 34070. Durango, Durango, México.

5Universidad Juárez del Estado de Durango, Instituto de Silvicultura e Industria de la Madera. Bulevar Guadiana núm. 501, Cd. Universitaria. C. P. 34120. Durango, Durango, México.


Abstract

Introduction:

In the nursery, controlled-release fertilization and inoculation with mycorrhizal fungi promote the quality of plant material reproduced in containers.

Objective:

To evaluate the effect of two commercial mycorrhizal inoculants and one controlled-release fertilizer on the development of Pinus engelmannii Carr. in nursery.

Materials and methods:

Two commercial inoculants (fungi native to Mexico [1 mL·plant-1 with 1.05 x 107 spores·mL-1] and exotics [1.5 mL·plant-1 with 6.5 x 106 spores·mL-1]), two doses of a controlled-release fertilizer (11-28-11 NPK [3 and 6 g·L-1]) and a control were evaluated; in total, nine treatments were used. The variables analyzed were: survival, stem height, root collar diameter, wet and dry biomass, ratio of dry biomass of the aerial part/dry biomass of the root part, lignification index, Dickson's quality index and mycorrhizal colonization.

Results and discussion:

Survival (80 to 96 %) was similar between treatments. Eight months after sowing, seedlings showed significant differences (P ≤ 0.05) in morphological variables; combined treatments gave better results. Plants with commercial inoculum of native fungi (1 mL·plant-1 [Amanita rubescens Pers., Amanita sp., Lactarius indigo [Schwein] Fr., Ramaria sp. and Boletus sp.]) and fertilization of 3 g·L-1 had higher Dickson quality index. It was observed that the higher the fertilization dose, the lower the percentage of mycorrhizal colonization.

Conclusion:

The combination of ectomycorrhizal inoculum of native fungi and low-dose fertilization showed that both components are complementary in the plant development of P. engelmannii.

Keywords: native fungi; ectomycorrhiza; controlled-release fertilizer; mycorrhizal colonization; plant quality

Resumen

Introducción:

En el vivero, la fertilización de liberación controlada y la inoculación con hongos micorrícicos favorecen la calidad del material vegetal reproducido en contenedores.

Objetivo:

Evaluar el efecto de dos inoculantes micorrícicos comerciales y un fertilizante de liberación controlada sobre el desarrollo de Pinus engelmannii Carr. en vivero.

Materiales y métodos:

Se evaluaron dos inoculantes comerciales (hongos nativos de México [1 mL·planta-1 con 1.05 x 107 esporas·mL-1] y exóticos [1.5 mL·planta-1 con 6.5 x 106 esporas·mL-1]), dos dosis de un fertilizante de liberación controlada (11-28-11 de NPK [3 y 6 g·L-1]) y un testigo; en total, se tuvieron nueve tratamientos. Las variables analizadas fueron: supervivencia, altura del tallo, diámetro al cuello de la raíz, biomasa húmeda y seca, relación biomasa seca de la parte aérea/biomasa seca de la parte radical, índice de lignificación, índice de calidad de Dickson y colonización micorrícica.

Resultados y discusión:

La supervivencia (80 a 96 %) fue similar entre tratamientos. A los ocho meses de la siembra, las plantas mostraron diferencias significativas (P ≤ 0.05) en las variables morfológicas; los tratamientos combinados dieron mejores resultados. Las plantas con inoculante comercial de hongos nativos (1 mL·planta-1 [Amanita rubescens Pers., Amanita sp., Lactarius indigo [Schwein] Fr., Ramaria sp. y Boletus sp.]) y fertilización de 3 g·L-1 tuvieron mayor índice de calidad de Dickson. Se observó que a mayor dosis de fertilización existió menor porcentaje de colonización micorrícica.

Conclusión:

La combinación de inoculante ectomicorrícico de hongos nativos y fertilización en dosis baja demostró que ambos componentes son complementarios en el desarrollo de planta de P. engelmannii.

Palabras clave: hongos nativos; ectomicorriza; fertilizante de liberación controlada; colonización micorrícica; calidad de planta

Introduction

The term mycorrhiza refers to the symbiotic association between plant roots and the fungal mycelium of the soil (Honrubia, 2009). It is estimated that 90 % of plants form mycorrhizal symbiosis; the development of this type of symbiosis began approximately 400 million years ago (Sosa, Sanchez, Morales, & Cruz, 2006). Mycorrhizae promote the solubility and mobility of nutrients from the soil to the plant, conferring greater resistance to water stress and damage by disease (Carrasco-Hernández et al., 2010; Pera & Parladé, 2005). Likewise, mycorrhizae improve soil structure and interaction with beneficial microorganisms, thus contributing to plant development and growth (Gómez-Romero, Villegas, Sáenz-Romero, & Lindig-Cisneros, 2013; Osorio, 2012).

Among the types of mycorrhizae are endomycorrhizae and ectomycorrhizae; the latter are characterized by the formation of external mycelium and a Hartig network between the root cells without penetrating the cell wall. Ectomycorrhiza is established in more than 5 000 species of fungi, mostly in the class Basidiomycetes, and in about 3 000 species of angiosperms and gymnosperms. Ectomycorrhizae are associated with forest species and are relevant in the production of plants of the genus Pinus in nurseries. This genus is a forced symbiont, so the absence of mycorrhizae affects plant survival and development (García, Sarmiento, Sierra, & Mejía, 2012). Hence the importance of considering the presence of ectomycorrhizae as a parameter that evaluates the quality of the forest plant produced in the nursery (Martínez, Sarmiento, Sigala, Rosales, & Montoya, 2016; Secretaría de Economía, 2016).

In the nursery stage, the production of forest seedlings in containers requires inputs and processes to favor the quality of the plant material. Some of these are the growth medium, the type of container, the incorporation of fertilizers, inoculation with mycorrhizal fungi, irrigation, and control of environmental factors (Baltasar, Barroetaveña, & Rajchenberg, 2007; Castro-Garibay, Aldrete, López-Upton, & Ordáz-Chaparro, 2018). Nutrients are added either by incorporating controlled-release fertilizers into the substrate and nutrient solutions into the irrigation water, according to the needs of the plant during the production process, or by using both options (Dumroese, Landis, & Wilkinson, 2012). Respect to ectomycorrhizal fungi, the simplest and most common way to inoculate spores into plants is through water during irrigation (Baltasar et al., 2007).

Within the forest plant production cycle in nursery, it is more common for applied commercial inoculants to contain a mixture of spores of several native or exotic fungal species, such as Pisolithus tinctorius (Pers.) Coker et Couch and Scleroderma citrinum Pers. (García et al., 2012). In this regard, Prieto, García, Mejía, Huchín, and Aguilar (2009) found that out of 10 forest nurseries in the state of Durango only one considered mycorrhization as a cultural practice, using commercial inoculants with the spores of the exotic fungi mentioned above.

Three trends have been reported regarding mycorrhization and fertilization. The first refers to an adverse relationship, where the higher the fertilization, the lower the degree of mycorrhization (Baltasar et al., 2007; Salgado, Rajchenberg, & Barroetaveña, 2009). The second reports that mycorrhization is not affected by fertilization (Khasa et al., 2001) and the last one sustains a differentiated response that depends on the species of the ectomycorrhizal fungus; that is, one species may be more susceptible to fertilization than another (Brundett, Bougher, Dell, Grove, & Malajczuk, 1996; Trappe, 1977).

In Mexico, Escobar-Alonso and Rodríguez (2019), in their review of the state of the art on plant quality in Pinus, indicate the scarcity of studies related to mycorrhizal species, levels of mycorrhization and their effect on plant quality, and therefore recommend the increase of this type of trials. In this sense, the aim of the present work was to evaluate the effect of two commercial mycorrhizal inoculants and a controlled-release fertilizer on the development of Pinus engelmannii Carr. in nursery. One commercial inoculant contained a mixture of spores of fungi native to Mexico (Amanita rubescens Pers., Amanita sp., Lactarius indigo [Schwein] Fr., Ramaria sp. and Boletus sp.), while the other included a mixture of spores of exotic fungi (P. tinctorius and S. citrinum). It is assumed that at least one combination of inoculum type and fertilization dose favors the plant quality of P. engelmannii to a greater extent.

Materials and methods

Location of the study area

The experiment was conducted at the Praxedis Guerrero forest nursery of the Secretaría de Recursos Naturales y Medio Ambiente of the State of Durango, Mexico. The nursery is located at kilometer 12.5 of the Durango-El Mezquital highway, southeast of the city of Durango, Dgo. at the coordinates 23° 56' 58.3" LN and 104° 34' 07.4" LO at 1 890 m.

Production conditions

According to its development phase, the plant grew in different areas of the nursery. In the establishment stage, from October 11th to November 21st, 2018, the plant was in a greenhouse with a metallic structure protected with a 720 µm white polyethylene film, covered by a 50 % shadow mesh and with side curtains. From 22 November 2018 to 31 January 2019, the plant continued to grow in a tunnel greenhouse with green polyethylene, 720 µm caliber and 50 % shadow mesh. The average temperature and relative humidity were 20 °C and 66 %, respectively.

Three and a half months after sowing (from February 1st to May 11th 2019), corresponding to the fast growing stage, the vegetative material was moved to another production area with 50 % shadow mesh, where the average temperature was 18.5 °C and relative humidity 48 %. Finally, in the pre-conditioning stage, seven months after sowing (from May 12th to June 12th 2019), the plant was exposed to outdoor conditions with an average temperature of 23 °C and relative humidity of 42 %.

Plant production

Before sowing, as a pre-germination treatment, the seed was soaked in water at room temperature for 24 h and at the end fungicide was applied. The sowing was carried out on October 11th, 2018. A mixture of peat moss (57 %), vermiculite (23 %) and agrolite (20 %) was used as substrate. The total porosity of the substrate was 68.1 % and the aeration porosity was 31.5 % with a water retention capacity of 36.6 %, normal values according to the NMX-AA-170-SCFI-2016 standard (Secretaría de Economía, 2016). Black containers (165 mL volume) made of rigid polyethylene with internal root guides were used. During the preparation of the substrate, the nutrition of the plant was done by adding granulated controlled-release fertilizer (from eight to nine months) with a composition of 11-28-11 of N-P-K, respectively.

Prior to inoculation, spore concentrations in each inoculum were checked with the Neubauer chamber or hematocytometer to determine the doses used in each proposed treatment. Inoculants with native and exotic fungal spores had a concentration of 1.05 x 107 spores-mL-1 and 6.5 x 106 spores-mL-1, respectively. Inoculation was carried out four months after sowing when the seedlings had secondary roots (Figure 1a). The procedure consisted in injecting the spore solution directly into the growing substrate, at an angle of approximately 45° to the main root of the plant at a depth of 5 cm, ensuring that the solution had the greatest possible contact with the root system (Figure 1b).

Figure 1 (a) Seedling of Pinus engelmannii with secondary roots at the time of inoculation. (b) Inoculation technique used. 

Evaluated treatments and experimental design

The treatments were distributed in a randomized full-block experimental design. Nine treatments were evaluated considering controlled inoculation derived from two commercial products plus a non-inoculation condition, combined with two doses of controlled-release fertilizer, as well as a control without fertilizer (Table 1). A commercial inoculum was used which consisted of a mixture of spores from fungi native to Mexico: A. rubescens, Amanita sp., L. indigo, Ramaria sp. and Boletus sp.; the other commercial inoculum included a mixture of spores from exotic fungi: P. tinctorius and S. citrinum. Each treatment consisted of four replicates with 49 plants each.

Table 1 Treatments applied with commercial mycorrhizal inoculants and controlled-release fertilizer in the development of Pinus engelmannii in nursery. 

Treatments Description
1 (Control) No controlled-release fertilizer and no inoculant
2 (FB) Low fertilization (3 g·L-1)
3 (FA) High fertilization (6 g·L-1)
4 (ICHN) Commercial inoculant with native fungal spores (1 mL·plant-1 [1.05 x 107 spores·mL-1])
5 (ICHE) Commercial exotic fungal spore inoculant (1.5 mL·plant-1 [6.5 x 106 spores·mL-1])
6 (ICHN+FB) Commercial inoculant with native fungal spores plus low fertilization
7 (ICHN+FA) Commercial inoculant with native fungal spores plus high fertilization
8 (ICHE+FB) Commercial inoculant with exotic fungal spores plus low fertilization
9 (ICHE+FA) Commercial inoculant with exotic fungal spores plus high fertilization

Variables evaluated

At eight months after sowing and four months after inoculation, the survival rate of the lot under study was determined, and from a total of 10 seedlings per experimental unit, extracted at random: stem height, root collar diameter, wet and dry biomass of the aerial part, and root were evaluated. To estimate the dry biomass, the plants were dehydrated at 65 °C in a forced ventilation oven for 72 h. Three plant quality indices were also determined which, through an evaluation of morphological variables, allow the prediction of the adaptation opportunity of a plant when it is moved to the field (Prieto et al., 2009). These indices were: ratio of dry biomass of the aerial part/dry biomass of the root part, lignification index (IL) and Dickson quality index (ICD) (Dickson, Leaf, & Hosner, 1960). The last two were obtained using the following expressions:

IL = Total dry weight (g)Total wet weight (g) ×100

ICD = Total dry weight (g)Height (cm)Diameter (mm)+Dry weight air part (g)Dry weight root (g)

The percentage of mycorrhizal colonization (PCM) was evaluated in the root system of three seedlings taken randomly from each experimental unit. The substrate adhered to the root system of the plants was removed with running water; subsequently, 100 cm of secondary roots per plant were randomly selected and preserved in a solution of formaldehyde, alcohol (96°), glacial acetic acid and distilled water in a ratio of 10:50:5:35. The number of mycorrhized and non-mycorrhized apexes was determined with a stereo microscope (Leica® EZ4 HD, Switzerland). The PCM was calculated with the equation used by García (2018):

PCM= Mycorrhized ApexesMycorrhized Apexes+Non-Mycorrhized Apexes×100

The percentage values of mycorrhizal colonization and survival were transformed with the arcsine and square root function. The data were subjected to an analysis of variance; in cases where significant differences existed, a Tukey mean separation test was performed, using the SAS® statistical program version 9.2 (Statistical Analysis System, 2009).

Results and discussion

Morphological variables

The average value of the root collar diameter showed statistical differences (P ≤ 0.05) between the treatments. The difference between the extreme values (2.60 to 5.11 mm) was of 100 %; according to Figure 2, the commercial exotic fungal spore inoculum (1.5 mL·plant-1) plus low fertilization (3 g·plant-1) (treatment 8 = ICHE + FB) generated the highest values. NMX-AA-170-SCFI-2016 stipulates that the P. engelmannii plant requires a minimum diameter of 5 mm to be considered as a quality plant that can be planted in the field (Secretaría de Economía, 2016).

Figure 2 Diameters of Pinus engelmannii obtained in treatments with commercial mycorrhizal inoculants and controlled-release fertilizers in nursery. FB = low fertilization (3 g·L-1), FA = high fertilization (6 g·L-1), ICHN = commercial inoculant with native fungal spores (1 mL·plant-1 [1.05 x 107 spores·mL-1]), ICHE = commercial inoculant with exotic fungal spores (1.5 mL·plant-1 [6.5 x 106 spores·mL-1]). 

Although treatments 2 (FB), 3 (FA) and 9 (ICHE + FA) were statistically equal (P ≤ 0.05) to treatment 6 (ICHN + FB), only the latter managed to comply with the minimum diameter established by NMX-AA-170-SCFI-2016; while the plants in the control treatment and the unfertilized treatments, regardless of the type of inoculum, had the lowest response (Figure 2).

Figure 3 shows the effect of treatments on the dry biomass of plants. The treatments with the highest total dry biomass were 6 (ICHN + FB) and 8 (ICHE + FB) with significant differences (P ≤ 0.05) with respect to the rest of the treatments. The dry biomass of the aerial part varied from 0.36 to 1.67 g, with treatment 8 (ICHE + FB) once again standing out. Fertilizer treatments and those that combined inoculum and fertilizer produced more aerial biomass than the solely inoculated and control treatments. Regarding the dry biomass of the root part, the range was from 0.44 to 1.12 g, where the treatment of the commercial inoculant with native fungal spores (1 mL·plant-1) plus low fertilization (3 g·plant-1) (treatment 6 = ICHN + FB) stood out; the lowest values occurred in the unfertilized treatments.

Figure 3 Dry biomass of Pinus engelmannii in the nursery, under treatments with commercial mycorrhizal inoculants and controlled-release fertilizers. FB = low fertilization (3 g·L-1), FA = high fertilization (6 g·L-1), ICHN = commercial inoculant with native fungal spores (1 mL·plant-1 [1.05 x 107 spores·mL-1]), ICHE = commercial inoculant with exotic fungal spores (1.5 mL·plant-1 [6.5 x 106 spores·mL-1]). 

Rentería-Chávez, Pérez-Moreno, Cetina-Alcalá, Ferrera-Cerrato, and Xoconostle-Cázares (2017) determined that Pinus greggii Engelm. plants inoculated with edible ectomycorrhizal fungi developed higher total biomass than those without inoculation. However, in the present study, the treatments with the lowest results were not the non-inoculated ones, but those without fertilizer. This is consistent with the findings of Vázquez-Cisneros et al. (2018), who found that the addition of slow-release fertilizer positively influenced the growth of species in the genus Pinus compared to the unfertilized plant.

Plant quality indices

The mean values of the ratio of dry biomass of the aerial part to dry biomass of the root part varied from 0.86 to 1.94. Treatments 3 (FA), 7 (ICHN + FA), 8 (ICHE + FB), and 9 (ICHE + FA) were in the range of 1.5 to 2.5, which represents an appropriate balance between transpiration and water uptake areas (Sáenz, Muñoz, Pérez, Rueda, & Hernández, 2014). Treatments 1 (Control), 4 (ICHN) and 5 (ICHE), characterized by not having fertilizer, obtained lower values (Table 2), which means that the root biomass is higher than the aerial one; therefore, there is disproportionality in the plant (Rodríguez, 2008).

Table 2 Mean values of plant quality indices of Pinus engelmannii at eight months after sowing, under mycorrhizal inoculation and controlled-release fertilization treatments. 

Treatments Relation dry biomass air/radical Index of lignification (%) Dickson’s quality index
1 Control 0.86 ± 0.04 25.76 ± 1.04 bc 0.36 ± 0.02 d
2 FB 1.41 ± 0.07 25.11 ± 0.49 bc 0.85 ± 0.04 abc
3 FA 1.76 ± 0.09 22.84 ± 0.60 c 0.70 ± 0.05 c
4 ICHN 0.87 ± 0.04 27.85 ± 0.81 ab 0.30 ± 0.02 d
5 ICHE 0.89 ± 0.06 30.56 ± 0.87 a 0.36 ± 0.02 d
6 ICHN+FB 1.38 ± 0.06 24.89 ± 0.41 bc 0.98 ± 0.05 a
7 ICHN+FA 1.89 ± 0.09 23.91 ± 0.68 c 0.76 ± 0.04 bc
8 ICHE+FB 1.63 ± 0.07 25.10 ± 0.47 bc 0.90 ± 0.04 ab
9 ICHE+FA 1.94 ± 0.10 22.99 ± 0.54 c 0.76 ± 0.04 bc

Means with different letters in the same column indicate significant difference between treatments according to Tukey (P ≤ 0.05). ± = Standard error of the media. FB = low fertilization (3 g·L-1), FA = high fertilization (6 g·L-1), ICHN = commercial inoculant with native fungal spores (1 mL·plant-1 [1.05 x 107 spores·mL-1]), ICHE = commercial inoculant with exotic fungal spores (1.5 mL·plant-1 [6.5 x 106 spores·mL-1]).

Prieto et al. (2009) refer that the lignification index expresses the level of pre-conditioning of the plants; when they are of quality, they present values of 25 to 30 %. This is related to the weathering phase where individuals suffer stress due to the drastic change in light conditions, from shadow mesh to outdoor and from more to less availability of humidity. In the present study, the treatments that lacked fertilizer reached optimal values (P ≤ 0.05).

The Dickson’s Quality Index is an integrated measure of morphological traits, where high values express better plant quality (García, 2018; Prieto et al., 2009). This index has been used to select better proportioned plants, as well as to predict their response once planted in the field (Sáenz et al., 2014). The results varied from 0.30 to 0.98, positioning the commercial inoculant with native fungal spores treatment (1 mL·plant-1) plus low fertilization (3 g·plant-1) (treatment 6 = ICHN + FB) as the best, with significant differences (P ≤ 0.05) with respect to the rest of the treatments. This is in agreement with what Martínez et al. (2016) report, who obtained an index of 1.08 as an effect of the inoculation with Russula delica Fr. in P. engelmannii, maintaining a fertilization regime according to the stages of development of the plant. According to this parameter, in the present study, the plants in the treatments without fertilization were those of lower quality (Table 2).

Survival

According to Figure 4, survival varied from 80 to 96 %, with no significant differences (P ≤ 0.05) among treatments. The literature reports negative effects on plants when using high doses of fertilization (Marschner, 2012), favoring plant susceptibility to pests and diseases that lead to death. This may explain the mortality caused by a more severe damping off outbreak in treatments 3 (FA), 7 (ICHN + FA) and 9 (ICHE + FA), characterized by high fertilization doses. This disease occurs in forest nurseries and is caused by a complex of fungi of the genera Phytopthora, Pythium, Fusarium and Rhizoctonia; its main characteristic is the necrosis of the conduction tissue at the neck of the seedling root that causes its death (Cibrián, Alvarado, & García, 2007).

Figure 4 Survival of Pinus engelmannii plants in treatments with commercial mycorrhizal inoculants and controlled-release fertilizer, after eight months from sowing. FB = low fertilization (3 g·L-1), FA = high fertilization (6 g·L-1), ICHN = commercial inoculant with native fungal spores (1 mL·plant-1 [1.05 x 107 spores·mL-1]), ICHE = commercial inoculant with exotic fungal spores (1.5 mL·plant-1 [6.5 x 106 spores·mL-1]). 

Percentage of mycorrhizal colonization

Figure 5 shows that the PCM varied from 15 to 71 % and showed a reverse trend to the fertilization dose used. Treatments 3 (FA), 7(ICHN + FA) and 9 (ICHE + FA), characterized by having doses of 6 g·L-1 of controlled-release fertilizer, had low mycorrhization regardless of the type of inoculant, which is consistent with what is reported by Baltasar (2007) and Salgado et al. (2009). The treatments with higher PCM were 1 (Control), 4 (ICHN), 5 (ICHE) and 6 (ICHN + FB), highlighting treatment 4, although without statistical differences between them, indicating that the symbiosis was established with more abundance in a nutrient limited environment, functioning as an auxiliary nutrition mechanism. This is consistent with the observations of Bücking, Liepold, and Ambilwade (2012), who recognize the existence of two pathways for nutrient absorption in plants; the direct one involving the epidermis and root hairs, and the second through the ectomycorrhizae. In the latter, the external mycelium favors a greater exploration in the soil. Regarding the treatments without inoculation, due to the test being conducted under normal production conditions in nursery, the plants developed undesirable ectomycorrhizal colonization.

Although there was a negative trend with respect to the percentage of mycorrhization and the fertilization used, the results showed that treatment 6 (ICHN + FB) had a balance between the two variables; this had a favorable impact on the quality of the plant produced in that treatment, confirming the hypothesis. In general, the fungus-root association had a differentiated response depending on the amount of fertilizer used, which coincides with that proposed by Trappe (1977). In this respect, Brundett et al. (1996) carried out a study on fertilization and mycorrhizal fungi associated with Eucalyptus diversicolor F. Muell., and found that the increase in the dose of mineral fertilization had an effect on the decrease in mycorrhizal colonization; however, this effect was differential, finding that the genus Scleroderma is less susceptible to fertilization than P. tinctorius.

Figure 5 Mycorrhizal colonization (PCM) in Pinus engelmannii plants under mycorrhizal treatments and controlled-release fertilizers, after eight months from sowing. FB = low fertilization (3 g·L-1), FA = high fertilization (6 g·L-1), ICHN = commercial inoculant with native fungal spores (1 mL·plant-1 [1.05 x 107 spores·mL-1]), ICHE = commercial inoculant with exotic fungal spores (1.5 mL·plant-1 [6.5 x 106 spores·mL-1]). 

Characterization of ectomycorrhizae

In the present study three morphotypes of ectomycorrhizae were found: one from the commercial inoculant with native fungal spores and two from the commercial inoculant with exotic fungal spores. From the first inoculant containing spores of A. rubescens, Amanita sp., L. indigo, Ramaria sp. and Boletus sp., only one morphotype was identified that was related to the genus Amanita spp. and presented dichotomous branching without rhizomorphs, with straight unbranched ends of cylindrical non-inflammatory shape and slightly sharp end, ochre, yellowish ochre or white with presence of mantle (Figure 6a) (Determination of ectomycorrhizae [DEEMY], 2019). The remaining species contained in the inoculant (L. indigo, Ramaria sp. and Boletus sp.) did not form ectomycorrhizae. In this regard, Ishida, Nara, Tanaka, Kinoshita, and Hogetsu (2008) and Nara (2009), mentioned that some species of ectomycorrhizal fungi are pioneers, so their spores respond quickly to germination in the presence of roots of host plants, in contrast, other species (which include species of the genus Lactarius) require additional stimuli obtained as the habitat develops, so the spore inoculation may not be successful.

From the inoculant with exotic fungal spores, two morphotypes were identified; the first one related to S. citrinum, which in structures with initial development was characterized by ectomycorrhizae with stipe and dichotomous branching, white color and without presence of rhizomorphs. The mycorrhizal systems in mature stages presented mainly stipe and coralloid branching of yellowish-white color, with straight unbranched ends and presence of rhizomorphs (Figure 6b). The second morphotype had stipe and coralloid structures with brown dichotomous ramifications, straight unbranched apexes and rhizomorphs of restricted connection to the lateral part of the apexes. This description corresponds to the one made by Valdés, Ambriz, Camacho, and Fierros (2010), who tested the same product used in the present work and which also contained spores of P. tinctorius, only in roots of Pinus devoniana Lindl. (Figure 6c).

In treatments without inoculum (Control, FB and FA) mycorrhizal colonization was observed in initial stages, a condition that did not allow the identification of species. In general, mycorrhizal systems in the treatments with only inoculum (ICHN and ICHE), as well as those with inoculum and low fertilization (ICHN + FB and ICHE + FB) showed ectomycorrhizae in mature stages; in contrast, treatments with inoculum and high fertilization (ICHN + FA and ICHE + FA) showed mycorrhizal structures in initial stages of development (Figures 6d and 6e). This could indicate that the level of mycorrhization, up to the time of evaluation, was affected as a function of fertilization dose, delaying the development of ectomycorrhizae, as observed by Marx (1980).

Figure 6 Ectomycorrhizal morphotypes in Pinus engelmannii: (a) Amanita spp. related morphotype; (b) Scleroderma citrinum related morphotype; (c) Pisolithus tinctorius related morphotype described by Valdés et al. (2010); (d) initial stage ectomycorrhiza; (e) mature stage Scleroderma citrinum related ectomycorrhiza. 

Conclusions

The combination of commercial inoculant with native fungal spores (1 mL·plant1) and 3 g·L-1 fertilization led to a better quality of the plant compared to commercial inoculant with exotic fungal spores (1.5 mL·plant1), demonstrating that both components favor the quality of Pinus engelmannii in nursery. The incorporation of the high dose of controlled-release fertilizer led to a negative trend in the percentage of mycorrhization. The diversity of ectomycorrhizal fungal spores contained in commercial inoculants does not result in a diversity of mycorrhizal formation, as it happens with the commercial inoculant of native fungi. The results represent a contribution to the technical knowledge for the production of quality plant of P. engelmannii in nursery, which affects the survival of the species in the field.

Acknowledgements

To CONACYT, for the financing granted to Dr. Silvia Salcido Ruiz within the framework of a post-doctoral stay in the Institutional Program for the Doctorate in Agricultural and Forestry Sciences at the Universidad Juárez del Estado de Durango. To the Secretary of Natural Resources and Environment of the government of the state of Durango, for the support for this work with infrastructure and materials in the forest nursery "Praxedis Guerrero".

References

Baltasar, M. D., Barroetaveña, C., & Rajchenberg, M. (2007). Influencia del régimen de fertilización y del momento de inoculación en la micorrización de Pinus ponderosa en la etapa de vivero. Bosque, 28(3), 226‒233. doi: 10.4067/S0717-92002007000300007 [ Links ]

Brundett, M., Bougher, N., Dell, B., Grove, T., & Malajczuk, N. (1996). Working with mycorrhizas in forestry and agriculture. Canberra, Australia: Australian Center for International Agricultural Research. doi: 10.13140/2.1.4880.5444 [ Links ]

Bücking, H., Liepold, E., & Ambilwade, P. (2012). The role of the mycorrhizal symbiosis in nutrient uptake of plants and the regulatory mechanisms underlying these transport processes. In N. Kumar, & S. Charan (Eds.), Plant science (pp. 107‒138). doi: 10.5772/52570 [ Links ]

Carrasco-Hernández, V., Pérez-Moreno, J., Espinosa-Hernández, V., Almaraz-Suárez, J. J., Quintero-Lizaola, R., & Torres-Aquino, M. (2010). Caracterización de micorrizas establecidas entre dos hongos comestibles silvestres y pinos nativos de México. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas, 1(4), 567‒577. Retrieved from http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2007-09342010000400009&lng=es&tlng=esLinks ]

Castro-Garibay, S. L., Aldrete, A., López-Upton, J., & Ordáz-Chaparro, V. M. (2018). Efecto del envase, sustrato y fertilización en el crecimiento de Pinus greggii var. australis en vivero. Agrociencia, 52(1), 115‒127. Retrieved from http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1405-31952018000100115&lng=es&tlng=esLinks ]

Cibrián, T. D., Alvarado, R. D., & García, D. S. E. (2007). Enfermedades forestales en México. México: Universidad Autónoma Chapingo. [ Links ]

Determination of ectomycorrhizae (DEEMY). (2019). An information system for characterization and determination of ectomycorrhizae. Retrieved August 1, 2019 from http://www.deemy.de/Links ]

Dickson, A., Leaf, A. L., & Hosner, J. F. (1960). Quality appraisal of white pine seedling stock in nurseries. The Forestry Chronicle, 36(1), 10‒13. doi: 10.5558/tfc36010-1 [ Links ]

Dumroese, R. K., Landis, T. D., & Wilkinson, K. M. (2012). Riego y fertirriego. In M. G. Buamscha, L. T. Contardi, R. K. Dumroese, J. A. Enricci, R. R. Escobar, H. E. Gonda, …Wilkinson, K. M. (Eds.), Producción de plantas en viveros forestales (pp. 115‒125). Buenos Aires, Argentina: Consejo Federal de Inversiones, Centro de Investigación y Extensión Forestal Andino Patagónico, Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia San Juan Bosco. [ Links ]

Escobar-Alonso, S., & Rodríguez, T. D. A. (2019). Estado del arte en la investigación sobre calidad de planta del género Pinus en México. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Forestales, 10(55), 1‒38. doi: 10.29298/rmcf.v10i55.558 [ Links ]

García, R. J. L. (2018). Micorrización controlada de plantas del género Pinus en vivero y su incidencia sobre atributos del material y del comportamiento. Tesis doctoral, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, Chile . [ Links ]

García, R. J. L., Sarmiento, L. H., Sierra, A. D., & Mejía, B. J. M. (2012). Hongos silvestres ectomicorrízicos de bosques templados de los municipios de Pueblo Nuevo, San Dimas y Durango, Durango. México: Campo Experimental Valle del Guadiana, INIFAP-SAGARPA. Retrieved from http://biblioteca.inifap.gob.mx:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/3539Links ]

Gómez-Romero, M., Villegas, J., Sáenz-Romero, C., & Lindig-Cisneros, R. (2013). Efecto de la micorrización en el establecimiento de Pinus pseudostrobus en cárcavas. Revista Madera y Bosques, 19(3), 51‒63. doi: 10.21829/myb.2013.193327 [ Links ]

Honrubia, M. (2009). Las micorrizas: Una relación planta-hongo que dura más de 400 millones de años. Anales del Jardín Botánico de Madrid, 66(S1), 133‒144. doi: 10.3989/ajbm.2226 [ Links ]

Ishida, T. A., Nara, K., Tanaka, M., Kinoshita, A., & Hogetsu, T. (2008). Germination and infectivity of ectomycorrhizal fungal spores in relation to their ecological traits during primary succession. New Phytologist, 180(2), 491‒500. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02572.x [ Links ]

Khasa, P. D., Sigler, L., Chakravarty, P., Dancik, B. P., Erickson, L., & Mc Curdy, D. (2001). Effect of fertilization on growth and ectomycorrhizal development of container-grown and bare-root nursery conifer seedling. New Forests, 22(3), 179‒197. doi: 10.1023/A:1015674921878 [ Links ]

Marschner, P. (2012). Marschner's mineral nutrition of higher plants (3rd. ed.). USA: Elsevier/Academic Press. [ Links ]

Martínez, N. L. E., Sarmiento, L. H., Sígala, R. J. A., Rosales, M. S., & Montoya, A. J. B. (2016). Respuesta a la inoculación inducida de Russula delica Fr. en plantas de Pinus engelmannii Carr. en vivero. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Forestales, 7(33), 108‒117. doi: 10.29298/rmcf.v7i33.93 [ Links ]

Marx, D. H. (1980). Ectomycorrhizal fungus inoculations: A tool for improving forestations practices. In P. Mykola (Ed.), Tropical mycorrhiza research (pp. 13‒71). USA: Oxford University Press. [ Links ]

Nara, K. (2009). Spores of ectomycorrhizal fungi: ecological strategies for germination and dormancy. New Phytologist, 181(2), 245-248. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02691.x [ Links ]

Osorio, N. W. (2012). Uso de hongos formadores de micorriza como alternativa biotecnológica para promover la nutrición y el crecimiento de plántulas. Revista Manejo Integral del Suelo y Nutrición Vegetal, 1(2), 1‒4. Retrieved from https://www.bioedafologia.com/sites/default/files/documentos/pdf/Hongos-formadores-de-micorrizas.pdf Links ]

Pera, J., & Parladé, J. (2005). Inoculación controlada con hongos ectomicorrícicos en la producción de planta destinada a repoblaciones forestales: estado actual en España. Investigación Agraria: Sistemas y Recursos Forestales, 14(3), 419‒433. Retrieved from https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/IA/article/view/2340/1736Links ]

Prieto, R. J. A., García, R. J. L., Mejía, B. J. M., Huchín, A. S., & Aguilar, V. J. L. (2009). Producción de planta del género Pinus en vivero en clima templado frío. (1.a ed.). Durango, México: Campo Experimental Valle del Guadiana INIFAP. [ Links ]

Rentería-Chávez, M. C., Pérez-Moreno, J., Cetina-Alcalá, V. M., Ferrera-Cerrato, R., & Xoconostle-Cázares, B. (2017). Transferencia de nutrientes y crecimiento de Pinus greggii Engelm. inoculado con hongos comestibles ectomicorrícicos en dos sustratos. Revista Argentina de Microbiología, 49(1), 93‒104. doi: 10.1016/j.ram.2016.06.004 [ Links ]

Rodríguez, T. D. A. (2008). Indicadores de calidad de planta forestal. México: Mundi Prensa. [ Links ]

Sáenz, R. J. T., Muñoz, F. H. J., Pérez, D. C. M. A., Rueda, S. A., & Hernández, J. (2014). Calidad de planta de tres especies de pino en el vivero “Morelia”, estado de Michoacán. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Forestales, 5(26), 98‒111. doi: 10.29298/rmcf.v5i26.293 [ Links ]

Salgado, S. M. E., Rajchenberg, M., & Barroetaveña, C. (2009). Evaluación del estado micorrícico de plántulas de Pinus ponderosa producidas bajo fertirriego, sin manejo de la micorrización. Bosque, 30(3), 127‒134. doi: 10.4067/S0717-92002009000300002 [ Links ]

Secretaría de Economía. (2016). Norma Mexicana NMX-AA-170-SCFI-2014: Certificación de operación de viveros forestales. Retrieved March 9, 2019 from http://dof.gob.mx/nota_detalle_popup.php?codigo=5464460Links ]

Sosa, R. T., Sánchez, N. J., Morales, G. E., & Cruz, C. F. (2006). Interacción micorrizas arbusculares-Trichoderma harzianum (Moniliaceae) y efectos sobre el crecimiento de Brachiaria decumbens (Poaceae). Acta Biológica Colombiana, 11(1), 43‒54. Retrieved from http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/abc/v11n1/v11n1a04.pdfLinks ]

Statistical Analysis System (SAS Institute Inc.). (2009). SAS ver. 9.2. Cary, NC, USA: Author. [ Links ]

Trappe, J. M. (1977). Selection of fungi for ectomycorrhizal inoculation in nurseries. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 15, 203‒222. doi: 10.1146/annurev.py.15.090177.001223 [ Links ]

Valdés, R. M., Ambriz, P. E., Camacho, V. A., & Fierros, G. A. M. (2010). Inoculación de plántulas de pinos con diferentes hongos e identificación visual de la ectomicorriza. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Forestales, 1(2), 53‒64. doi: 10.29298/rmcf.v1i2.637 [ Links ]

Vázquez-Cisneros, I., Prieto-Ruíz, J. A., López-López, M. A., Wehenkel, C., Domínguez-Calleros, P. A., & Muñoz-Sáez, F. E. (2018). Growth and survival of plantation of Pinus greggii Engelm. ex Parl. var. greggii under different fertilization treatments. Revista Chapingo Serie Ciencias Forestales y del Ambiente, 24(2), 251‒264. doi: 10.5154/r.rchscfa.2017.05.036 [ Links ]

Received: November 07, 2019; Accepted: May 06, 2020

*Corresponding author: jprieto@ujed.mx; tel.: +52 (618) 136 1952.

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License