SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.24 issue2Aspergillus niger Tiegh., isolated in Sonora, Mexico: metal tolerance evaluationVegetative propagation in the field of Jatropha curcas L. for human consumption author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Revista Chapingo serie ciencias forestales y del ambiente

On-line version ISSN 2007-4018Print version ISSN 2007-3828

Rev. Chapingo ser. cienc. for. ambient vol.24 n.2 Chapingo May./Aug. 2018

http://dx.doi.org/10.5154/r.rchscfa.2017.08.053 

Technical note

Preferences for the use of firewood in a cultural landscape in southern Mexico

Efraín Aguirre-Cortés1 

Jorge O. López-Martínez2 

Benedicto Vargas-Larreta3 

Juan M. Pat-Fernández4 

Pedro Macario-Mendoza1  * 

1El Colegio de la Frontera Sur, Unidad Chetumal. Av. Centenario km 5.5. C. P. 77014. Chetumal, Quintana Roo, México.

2CONACyT - El Colegio de la Frontera Sur, Unidad Chetumal. Av. Centenario km 5.5. C. P. 77014. Chetumal, Quintana Roo, México.

3Instituto Tecnológico de El Salto. Mesa del Tecnológico s/n. C. P. 34942. El Salto, Durango, México.

4El Colegio de la Frontera Sur, Unidad Campeche. Av. Rancho Polígono 2-A, Cd. Industrial. C. P. 24500. Lerma, Campeche, México.

Abstract

Introduction:

Firewood is the main source of energy for developing countries.

Objective:

The relationship between the inhabitants of a cultural landscape and the consumption of firewood, and between the preferences of use and the relative importance of the species were marked.

Materials and methods:

A total of 132 semi-structured surveys were conducted in the region of Calakmul, Campeche, Mexico, to analyze the consumption of firewood. The importance value index (IVI) of the species harvested in the region was obtained in nine plots of 500 m2, divided into three classes of successional age: 7 to 10 years (class one), 11 to 20 years (class two), and over 20 years old (class three).

Results and dicussion:

A total of 60 species used as firewood were recorded. There was no correspondence between the preferred species and the first places of the IVI. The species most commonly used as firewood was Haematoxylum campechianum L. The species richness increased (59 to 68) and the number of individuals decreased (2 559 to 921) as the age of the vegetation increased. Firewood collection is a subsistence strategy that focuses on the elderly; traditional practices are at risk in the medium term.

Conclusion:

The cultural landscape and the preservation of forest resources should be addressed with strategies of promotion and training on the use of firewood as an energy resource.

Keywords: Consupmtion of firewood; succession; biomass; bioenergy; Calakmul

Introduction

Wood is usually the main source of energy for heating and cooking in poor communities in developing countries, both urban and rural (Bailis, Drigo, Ghilardi, & Masera, 2015; Ghilardi, Guerrero, & Masera, 2007). With population growth, pressure on forest resources has increased, causing the degradation of forests, as well as the impoverishment of millions of people linked to forestry (Lacuna-Richman, 2012).

The use of firewood, worldwide, is usually done outside the legal channels of forest exploitation. One of the great challenges to understand the importance of firewood on the dynamics of forest ecosystems is the generation of formal information that offers real data about the volumes extracted. The data on firewood consumption are based on estimates, mainly because most of the production and consumption of firewood takes place outside the commercial channels, so the information is not recorded. However, it is estimated that the traditional use of firewood represents about 55 % of the world's wood harvest and comprises approximately 9 % of the primary energy used. Bonjour et al. (2013) estimated that 2 700 million people, mainly in developing countries, use firewood traditionally as the main energy input for domestic activities. Of the tropic regions, Latin America has the lowest firewood consumption (Boucher et al., 2011). In Mexico, approximately 19 million people in rural and marginalized areas used firewood as exclusive source for domestic energy supply (Masera & Fuentes, 2006), and 9 million use the resource together with liquefied petroleum gas (LP) for the same activities (Best et al., 2006). The main firewood consuming states in the country are: Chiapas, Guanajuato, Guerrero, Hidalgo, Michoacán, Oaxaca, Puebla, Quintana Roo, Tabasco, Veracruz and Yucatan (Ávila-Bello, 2002).

From the social point of view, the consumption of firewood has severe consequences on health, particularly in the development of lung diseases due to the incomplete combustion process that releases harmful pollutants (Lim et al., 2012). From the environmental point of view, the impacts on deforestation, degradation of ecosystems and global warming are still uncertain; however, it has been shown that the extraction of firewood has serious implications at local scale in the dynamics of tropical forests (Rudel, 2013) and that the burning of biomass contributes to global warming, through the release of methane and dioxide of carbon to the atmosphere (Bond et al., 2013; Ghilardi et al., 2007; Ramanathan & Carmichael, 2008).

Southern Mexico is a region where the interrelation between nature and culture has been built through the perspective of cultural landscapes, which are a representation of the links between local rural communities and their natural environment (Fischer, Hartel, & Kuemmerle, 2012; Rössler, 2006); that is, the human-nature relationship is accepted, through ecological, biological, cultural or scenic values ​​and conservation is emphasized as a result of this interaction (Phillips, 2002). In this sense, the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO, 2014) named the Calakmul Biosphere Reserve as a World Heritage, due to the ecological knowledge of its inhabitants for the maintenance of ecosystem services. In southern Mexico, a variety of traditional practices is carried out, such as agroforestry systems; slash-and-burn agriculture; the milpa system; family gardens (Gliessman, 2002; Toledo, 2008), to preserve food production; soil fertility; vegetation cover; water uptaket; and firewood production as an energy component (Gómez & Méndez, 2007).

During colonial period in Mexico, cultural landscapes and traditional practices changed drastically; in the case of the Yucatan Peninsula, large areas of tropical forests were deforested for the extraction of precious woods and non-timber forest products (Sluyter, 2004). Consequently, the cultural and ecological elements were modified (Fischer et al., 2012), as well as the perception of ecosystem services by the inhabitants (Martín-López et al., 2012). The traditional knowledge of the rural communities is basic to elaborate strategies in the consumption of firewood. It has been observed that the lack of this resource is related to negative implications on family welfare, so it is relevant to explore the practices involved in the use (Brouwer, Hoorweg, & Van Liere, 1997), including the value it represents for the families in their uses and customs (Food and Agriculture Organization [FAO], 2016). In this context, the present study characterized the value of wood consumption and the factors that allow its use in the rural area, in the landscape of the region of Calakmul, Campeche, Mexico.

Materials and methods

Study area

The study was conducted in the south of the Yucatan peninsula, between Valentín Gómez Farías in Campeche, and Nicolás Bravo in Quintana Roo. The climate in the region is warm subhumid with average annual temperature of 24.9 °C and annual rainfall of 1 127 mm (Serrano-Altamirano, Ruiz-Corral, Rodríguez-Ávila, Medina-García, & Cano-García, 2007). Height above sea level varies between 95 and 265 m and the predominant vegetation is the evergreen tropical forest. (Miranda, 1978). The joint population of the localities is close to 8 000 inhabitants (Secretaría de Desarrollo Social [SEDESOL], 2013). The rural environment is dominant; the inhabitants are dedicated to field activities, mainly, and to those associated to the commerce and transfer of agricultural products inside and outside the region. The social organization of the populations is strongly rooted in the ejido, which dictates local consensual provisions for the use of natural resources.

Data collection

A total of 132 semi-structured surveys were conducted between April and July 2016, based on the guidelines suggested by FAO (2002), to analyze the consumption of firewood in rural locations. The survey is a technique that allows to obtain abundant information; however, it is necessary to systematize it correctly. In this case, two sets of variables were defined. The first set was formed by the following socioeconomic variables: age, gender, number of children and their age; extension of land and crops; fuel consumption at home, proportion and use thereof; amount of money saved through the use of firewood; gender and age of the family member who collects the firewood; means of transport used, wages and amounts paid; time used for the collection of firewood and periodicity of activity; species used and portion of the tree; type of stove used for cooking; and characteristics, advantages and disadvantages associated with firewood. The second set of variables included the particular characteristics of the species considered by users for their use, such as: taste conferred to food, calorific value, closeness, abundance and availability. Additionally, to know the relative importance of the species harvested, data from vegetation censuses in the Calakmul region were used. For that purpose, nine plots of 500 m2 were established, divided into three classes of successional age: 7 to 10 years (class one), 11 to 20 years (class two), over 20 years (class three); each class with three repetitions. The taxonomic identity of each individual with a diameter at breast height (DAP) greater than or equal to 2 cm was recorded at each quadrant, from which basal area of each individual and its abundance were obtained.

Data analysis

The information was captured in Excel® spreadsheets, recording each of the data obtained in the 30 questions of the survey. The importance of the species was determined based on the number of mentions of each of them by the respondents. The information of the recorded taxonomic identity of the species was validated through taxonomic keys (Miranda, 1978) and the database from the Centro de Investigación Científica de Yucatán, A. C. (CICY). With the information obtained in the sampling sites, the importance value index (IVI) was estimated, based on the specific density (number of individuals) and the basal area (biomass) of the species. The species use preferences were compared with the results of the IVI in order to determine if there is agreement between the species used and those of greater relative importance.

Results and discussion

The surveys recorded 60 species used as firewood. According to Figure 1, in vegetation sampling, the species with the highest IVI in each age class were: Bursera simaruba (L.) Sarg. (7 to 10 years), Croton sp. (11 to 20 years) and Manilkara zapota (L.) P. Royen (>20 years). The first 10 species with the highest IVI represented 69, 57 and 60 % in each age class. It was also observed that the species richness increased with the age of vegetation (7 to 10 years: 59 species, 11 to 20 years: 64 species; >20 years: 68 species), which agrees with reported studies (Báez-Vargas et al., 2017; Chowdhury, 2007) for the forests of the region. On the contrary, the number of individuals decreased with the age of sites (7 to 10 years: 2 559, 11 to 20 years: 1 220; > 20 years: 921), which was also observed by Díaz-Gallegos, García-Gil, Castillo-Acosta, and March-Mifsut (2001); Martínez and Galindo-Leal (2002); and Báez-Vargas et al. (2017).

Figure 1 Importance value index (IVI) of the species in three classes of successional age: A) 7 to 10 years, B) 11 to 20 years and C) > 20 years. 

The relationship between the species most commonly used as firewood and the IVI values (Table 1) indicate that, contrary to expectations, the most important species in the region are not the most widely used. For example, the most commonly used species (Haematoxylum campechianum L.) was found only in the youngest age class with an IVI of 0.1, unlike the IVI of B. simaruba (31.2), the most important species in class one. This differs from that found in the studies of Vázquez-Calvo, Cruz-León, Santos-Cervantes, Pérez-Torres, and Sangerman-Jarquín (2016) and de Yescas-Albarrán, Cruz-León, Gómez-Uribe, Lara-Bueno, and Maldonado-Torres (2016), who observed that Acacia pennatula (Schlecht. & Cham.) Benth. (cubata blanco), Gliricidia sepium (Jacq.) Steud. (matarrata) and Lysiloma acapulcense (Kunth) Benth. (tepehuaje) were the preferred species for fuelwood consumption and also the most abundant in the study regions.

Table 1 Comparison of frequency of use (consumer references) and importance value index (IVI) of the species in three successional age classes (IVI 1 = 7 to 10 years, IVI 2 = 11 to 20 years, IVI 3 = >20 years). 

Common name Scientific name Frequency of use (% references) IVI 1 IVI 2 IVI 3
Tinto Haematoxylum campechianum L. 50.0 0.1 0.0 0.0
Zapote Pouteria campechiana (Kunth) Baehni 43.2 1.5 3.4 8.6
Cascarillo Croton sp. 34.8 14.2 12.9 6.2
Jabín Piscidia piscipula (L.) Sarg. 21.2 2.4 0.6 0.0
Tzalam Lysiloma latisiliquum (L.) Benth. 18.2 2.3 6.4 0.0
Xuul Lonchocarpus sp. 15.1 0.0 7.0 8.8
Zapotillo Pouteria unicularis (Donn. Smith) Baehni 14.4 1.4 0.2 9.2
Chicozapote Manilkara zapota (L.) P. Royen 11.4 0.0 0.3 10.3
Laurelillo Nectandra sp. 7.6 0.1 2.1 0.3
Machiche Lonchocarpus castilloi Standley 7.6 0.0 2.7 0.0

With regard to the extraction of firewood, 95 % of respondents mentioned that the main source are trees, trunks and dead branches of standing or fallen trees; the rest indicated that they felled trees to obtain firewood. Firewood is the main fuel in rural communities in southeastern Mexico, which coincides with that reported by Del Amo (2002). People use firewood in different proportions, only 12 % depends entirely on firewood; that is, they do not occupy gas or electricity at home. Firewood is used mainly for cooking and heating water; 76 % of respondents indicated that they use firewood daily, while 7.6 % only occasionally; 4.5 % mentioned that they use firewood when cooking special meals or have special festivities; 71.4 % use stoves of different materials, mainly rustic; 24.6 % have wood stoves and only 4 % have firewood saving stoves (built with mud and sand), wood oven or grills.

Firewood is collected, for the most part, by men (81 %). The people who carry out this activity are between 40 and 60 years old, who represent 40 % of the work force, followed by the segment of 25 to 40 years old (21 %), older than 60 years old (16 %) and people aged between 10 and 25 years old (10 %). The demographic and socioeconomic data of the people surveyed are shown in Table 2.

Table 2 Socioeconomic variables of 132 people surveyed who use firewood in southern Mexico. 

Category Variables Average (%) Minimum-maximum
Demographic data Age 47 17-83
Number of children 3.4 0-13
Children’s age 13.6 0.5-50
Main work Field 45
Home 32
Employees 23
Family background Yucatan peninsula 60
South of Mexico 38
Other states 2
Scholarship Elementary school 40
Junior High school 40
None 11
High school 7
University 2
Civil status Married 58
Free union 19
Single 14
Divorced 5
Widower 3

Most wood is transported using motorized vehicle (55 %), followed by bicycle or tricycle (bicycle adapted with a transport container, 22 %), transport by foot (13.5 %), wheelbarrow (9 %) and animals (5.5 %). Firewood source supply is in own land or ejidos (60 %), friends´s land (20 %) and in plots or courtyards (8 %). The respondents indicated that they invest about two hours in the collection of firewood (40 %), one to two (36 %), half an hour or less (15 %) or even all day (8 %). On average, the distance traveled for the collection of firewood is 5 km (49 %), followed by 1 to 5 km (27 %) and less than 1 km (23.5 %).

The most important factor in fuelwood consumption is the economic one; 68 % of respondents said so. In contrast, 65 % of the respondents indicated that the main disadvantage is the risk to health (Table 3). The incomplete combustion of the biomass releases small particles of other components whose harmfulness to human health at home environment has already been documented (Smith, 2006). In suitable stoves it is possible the clean consumption of firewood and coal, which gives rise mainly to carbon dioxide and water; however, such conditions are difficult to achieve in poor rural areas where small, cheap stoves are used that are fueled with firewood. Firewood that does not burn properly is converted into carbon dioxide, resulting in products of incomplete combustion, basically carbon monoxide, but also benzene, butadiene, formaldehyde, polyaromatic hydrocarbons and many other compounds dangerous to health (Bonjour et al., 2013).

Table 3 Advantages and disadvantages of fuelwood consumption, indicated by 132 people surveyed in southern Mexico. 

Factor Advantages (%) Disadvantages (%) No mention (%)
Avaliability 9.6 14.6 75.8
Economy 68.0 0 32.0
Flavor 5.6 0 94.4
Healt risks 0 65.0 35.0
Calorific value 12.8 11.3 75.9
Other reasons 4.0 9.1 86.9

Regarding the monetary parameters associated with firewood, 57 % of respondents pay wages (equivalent to one working day) for the extraction of firewood, with an average of 124.00 Mexican pesos (from 50.00 MXN to 250.00 MXN). Of the total number of respondents, 78 % said that firewood represents savings and only 15 % reported some income; only 3.8 % of people allocate resources for the purchase of firewood on a regular basis. As pointed out by Alayón-Gamboa (2014); Neulinger, Alayón-Gamboa, and Reinhard-Vogl (2014); and Chí-Quej et al. (2014), the socioeconomic environment in the region encourages the use of natural resources as a subsistence strategy based on self-consumption, which maintains the practice of traditional land uses such as family gardens, cornfields, plots or activities silvicultural.

Although the extraction of firewood can be considered of low economic importance in terms of the net income that is perceived with respect to forestry, agriculture, livestock or beekeeping (González-Abraham, Schmook, & Calmé, 2007), extraction strategies can compensate the low income in the communities. This is due to the fact that about half of the people collect firewood at distances close to 5 km, which implies a moderate expenditure in the transport and use of fossil fuels.

The results also suggest that the preference for the selection of firewood is associated to biological attributes of species typical of the late phases of secondary succession. This agrees with the study of Del Amo (2002) in the same region of study, whose preferences were focused on tinto (H. campechianum), chicozapote (M. zapota), chacteviga (Caesalpinia violacea [Mill.] Standl.), jabin (Piscidia piscipula [L.] Sarg.) and zapote (Pouteria campechiana [Kunth] Baehni). In other assessments in southern Mexico similar trends were found on concentrated use in few species. Ramírez-López, Ramírez-Marcial, Cortina-Villar, and Castillo-Santiago (2012) found preference of 10 of 138 species in coffee communities of Chiapas; while Quiroz-Carranza and Orellana (2010) mention five preferred species of 41 in Yucatan. The preference in the use of firewood species is related to attributes and characteristics such as availability, economic and energy implications, in accordance with the study of Escobar-Ocampo, Niños-Cruz, Ramírez-Marcial, and Yépez-Pacheco (2009) in the central area of Chiapas.

The results indicate that, contrary to what is proposed by different authors such as Dufraisse (2012) and Piqué (1999), there is no direct relationship between the dynamics of plant communities and human preferences over species as a source of firewood, since in the south of the Yucatan Peninsula, a great variety of species of different successional phases are used, indistinctly. However, potential fuel capitals increase when extracting firewood from trunks and branches of dead or sick trees that have diminished their carbon capture capacity, which would decrease the intra- and interspecific competition. The effect of extraction of woody material on carbon sequestration and soil nutrients in fragmented forests has been documented by García-Oliva et al. (2014), from the quantification of soil organic carbon, while the high contribution of tropical secondary forests in carbon sequestration has been shown by Poorter et al. (2016)

Modifications in the structure and composition of the species community cause users to adopt different strategies in the use of the resource. For example, the benefits of necromass extraction have been widely reported in agroforestry systems, as well as in multi-stratum crops, since greater growth in biomass of established species has been observed. Chí-Quej et al. (2014) also suggest that work in this type of crops is a work alternative that contributes to the equitable distribution of work among family members.

The results coincide with studies conducted through interviews and questionnaires in other regions of the world. Martín-López et al. (2012) evaluated the perception of society and sociocultural values on ecosystem services and functions in communities of the Iberian Peninsula; Agbenyega, Burgess, Cook, and Morris (2009) did something similar in forests in England, and Iftekhar and Takama (2008) analyzed the ecosystem benefits provided by mangroves in Bangladesh. The surveys applied in the present study are a simple and practical application tool that allows the approximation of two aspects in the exploration of cultural landscapes, as shown by Hartel et al. (2014) in rural communities of Romania, through socio-economic, cultural and biological data.

It is important to highlight that the cultural landscape analyzed in this study is in danger due to different factors. The young population is not actively involved in traditional land use practices; aspirations of the new generations do not find satisfaction in rural environments, as indicated by Oroszi (2004). The majority of the owners of the land are people over 40 years old, which puts at risk the permanence of ancestral customs and uses in the medium term. In addition, there is a latent threat to ecosystems, due to the expansion of urban, agricultural or livestock areas, which has already occurred in previous decades in the Yucatan Peninsula. Finally, it is important to point out that, although the extraction of firewood per se is not cause but an effect of deforestation (due to the amount of available waste derived from forest extraction), it has been related as a factor of disturbance or degradation of ecosystems (González-Espinosa, Ochoa-Gaona, Ramírez-Marcial, & Quintana-Ascencio, 1997; Masera, Astier, & López-Ridaura, 2000).

Conclusions

This research is one of the few studies that establishes the relationship between the preferences in the consumption of firewood in a region and the relative importance of the species in the ecosystem. The species used as a source of firewood do not correspond to those that have the highest IVI in the region. Some attributes of the preferred species are availability in the land, calorific value or the flavor of the food associated with cooking using firewood. The socioeconomic dynamics of the communities in the south of the Yucatan peninsula suggest that collecting firewood and using it as fuel is a subsistence strategy; in addition, it represents savings for the activities that are indispensable at home. The segment of the population dedicated to the collection of firewood is made up of older people, while the young population is not actively linked to such activity. As a result, traditional practices associated with the use of firewood may be at risk in the medium term. The cultural landscape and the preservation of the forest resources of this region of Mexico should be addressed with strategies of promotion and training on the use of firewood as an important energy resource.

Acknowledgments

The first author thanks El Colegio de la Frontera Sur (ECOSUR) and the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACyT) for the national grant that allowed the realization of the Master's studies with the project “Potential for the use of firewood in secondary forests managed in the south of the state of Campeche”. The author also thanks the Commisioner of Communal Lands of Laguna Om, Quintana Roo. To Juan Manuel Herrera, Albert Chan and Alicia Trujillo for their technical and logistical support. To Francisco Guízar Vázquez, Jesús Chí, Birgit Inge Schmook, for their comments and contributions in the present manuscript.

References

Agbenyega, O., Burgess, P. J., Cook, M., & Morris, J. (2009). Application of an ecosystem function framework to perceptions of community woodlands. Land Use Policy, 26, 551-557. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.08.011 [ Links ]

Alayón-Gamboa, J. A. (2014). Contribución del huerto familiar a la seguridad alimentaria de las familias campesinas de Calakmul, Campeche. In J. A. Alayón-Gamboa, & A. Morón-Ríos (Eds.), El huerto familiar: Un sistema socioecológico y biocultural para sustentar los modos de vida campesinos en Calakmul, México (pp. 15-39). México: El Colegio de la Frontera Sur. [ Links ]

Ávila-Bello, C. H. (2002). La leña: El energético rural en tres micro-regiones del sureste de México. Sociedades Rurales, Producción y Medio Ambiente, 3(1), 99-101. Retrieved from http://srpma.xoc.uam.mx/tabla_contenido.php?id=59Links ]

Báez-Vargas, A. M., Esparza-Olguín, L., Martínez-Romero, E., Ochoa-Gaona, S., Ramírez-Marcial, N., & González-Valdivia, N. (2017). Effect of management on tree diversity in secondary vegetation in the Biosphere Reserve of Calakmul, Campeche, Mexico. Revista de Biología Tropical, 65(1), 41-53. doi: 10.15517/rbt.v65i1.20806 [ Links ]

Bailis, R., Drigo, R., Ghilardi, A., & Masera, O. (2015). The carbon footprint of traditional woodfuels. Nature Climate Change, 5, 266-272. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2491 [ Links ]

Best, B., Gómez, M. I. E., Aguillón, M., Arvizu, J. L., Díaz, R., Gamiño, C., & Berrueta, V. M. (2006). Aplicaciones de las tecnologías bioenergéticas. In O. Masera (Ed.), La bioenergía en México, un catalizador del desarrollo sustentable. México: Comisión Nacional Forestal & Mundi-Prensa. [ Links ]

Bond, T. C., Doherty, S. J., Fahey, D. W., Forster, P. M., Berntsen, T., DeAngelo, B. J., ...Kinne, S. (2013). Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system: A scientific assessment. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 118(11), 5380-5552. doi: 10.1002/jgrd.50171 [ Links ]

Bonjour, S., Adair-Rohani, H., Wolf, J., Bruce, N. G., Mehta, S., Prüss-Ustün, A., …Smith, K. R. (2013). Solid fuel use for household cooking: Country and regional estimates for 1980-2010. Environmental Health Perspectives, 121(7), 784-790. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1205987 [ Links ]

Boucher, D., Elias, P., Lininger, K., May-Tobin, C., Roquemore, S., & Saxon, E. (2011). The root of the problem: What’s driving tropical deforestation today. Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA: Union of Concerned Scientists. Retrieved from http://www.ucsusa.org/sites/default/files/legacy/assets/documents/global_warming/UCS_RootoftheProblem_DriversofDeforestation_FullReport.pdfLinks ]

Brouwer, I., Hoorweg, J., & Van Liere, M. (1997). When households run out of fuel: responses of rural households to decreasing fuelwood availability, Ntcheu District, Malawi. World Development, 25(2), 255-266. doi: 10.1016/S0305-750X(96)00100-3 [ Links ]

Chí-Quej, J., Alayón-Gamboa, J. A., Rivas-Platero, G. G., Gutiérrez-Montes, I., Detlefsen, G., & Kú-Quej, V. M. (2014). Contribución del huerto familiar a la economía campesina en Calakmul, Campeche. In J. A. Alayón-Gamboa, & A. Morón-Ríos (Eds.), El huerto familiar: Un sistema socioecológico y biocultural para sustentar los modos de vida campesinos en Calakmul, México (pp. 75-89). México: El Colegio de la Frontera Sur . [ Links ]

Chowdhury, R. (2007). Household land management and biodiversity: secondary succession in a forest agriculture mosaic in southern Mexico. Ecology and Society 12(2), 31. Retrieved fro http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss2/art31/Links ]

Del Amo, R. S. (2002). La leña: el energético rural en tres micro-regiones del sureste de México. México: Editorial Plaza y Valdés - Programa Acción Forestal Tropical - Consejo Nacional para la Enseñanza de la Biología. [ Links ]

Díaz-Gallegos, J., García-Gil, G., Castillo-Acosta, O., & March-Mifsut, I. (2001). Uso del suelo y transformación de selvas en un ejido de la Reserva de la Biosfera Calakmul, Campeche, México (parte 2). Investigaciones Geográficas, 44, 39-53. Retrieved from http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=56904407Links ]

Dufraisse, A. (2012). Firewood and woodland management in their social, economic and ecological dimensions. In E. Badal, Y. Carrión, M. Macías, & N. Ntinou (Eds.), Wood and charcoal evidence for human and natural history (pp. 65-73). España: Universitat de València. Retrieved from https://ojs.uv.es/index.php/saguntumextra/article/view/2313/1898Links ]

Escobar-Ocampo, M. A., Niños-Cruz, J. A., Ramírez-Marcial, N., & Yépez-Pacheco, C. (2009). Diagnóstico participativo del uso, demanda y abastecimiento de leña en una comunidad zoque del centro de Chiapas, México. Ra Ximhai, 5(2), 201-223. Retrieved from http://www.ejournal.unam.mx/rxm/vol05-02/RXM005000206.pdfLinks ]

Fischer, J., Hartel, T., & Kuemmerle, T. (2012). Conservation policy in traditional farming landscapes. Conservation Letters, 5, 167-175. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2012.00227.x [ Links ]

Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). (2002). Información sobre madera para energía en América Latina. Santiago, Chile: Author. [ Links ]

Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). (2016). Forestry for a low-carbon future integrating forests and wood products in climate change strategies. Rome, Italy: Author. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/3/a-i5857e.pdfLinks ]

García-Oliva, F., Covaleda, S., Gallardo, J. F., Prat, C., Velázquez-Durán, R., & Etchevers, J. D. (2014). La extracción de leña afecta los almacenes de carbono y nutrientes en fragmentos de bosques templados en el Eje Transvolcánico Mexicano. Bosque, 35(3), 311-324. doi: 10.4067/S0717-92002014000300006 [ Links ]

Ghilardi, A., Guerrero, G., & Masera, O. (2007). Spatial analysis of residential fuelwood supply and demand patterns in Mexico using the WISDOM approach. Biomass and Bioenergy, 31(7), 475-491. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2007.02.003 [ Links ]

Gliessman, S. R. (2002). Agroecología: procesos ecológicos en agricultura sostenible. Costa Rica: CATIE. [ Links ]

Gómez, I., & Méndez, V. E. (2007). El caso de la asociación de comunidades forestales de Petén (ACOFOP). Análisis de contexto. Jakarta, Indonesia: CIFOR y PREIMA. Retrieved from http://www.cifor.org/acm/download/pub/grassroot/Peten_Spanish%20all.pdfLinks ]

González-Abraham, A., Schmook, B., & Calmé, S. (2007). Distribución espacio-temporal de las actividades extractivas en los bosques del ejido Caobas, Quintana Roo. Investigaciones Geográficas, 62, 70-86. Retrieved from http://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/igeo/n62/n62a5.pdfLinks ]

González-Espinosa, M., Ochoa-Gaona, S., Ramírez-Marcial, N., & Quintana-Ascencio, P. F. (1997). Contexto vegetacional y florístico de la agricultura. In M. R. Parra, & B. M. Díaz (Eds.), Los Altos de Chiapas: Agricultura y crisis rural. Tomo 1: Los recursos naturales (pp. 85-117). México: El Colegio de la Frontera Sur . [ Links ]

Hartel, T., Fischer, J., Câmpeanu, C., Milcu, A. I., Hanspach, J., & Fazey, I. (2014). The importance of ecosystem services for rural inhabitants in a changing cultural landscape in Romania. Ecology and Society, 19(2), 42. doi: 10.5751/ES-06333-190242 [ Links ]

Iftekhar, M. S., & Takama, T. (2008). Perceptions of biodiversity, environmental services, and conservation of planted mangroves: a case study of Nijhum Dwip Island, Bangladesh. Wetlands Ecology and Management, 16, 119-137. doi: 10.1007/s11273-007-9060-8 [ Links ]

Lacuna-Richman, C. (2012). Growing from seed: An introduction to social forestry. Netherlands: Springer. [ Links ]

Lim, S. S., Vos, T., Flaxman, A. D., Danaei, G., Shibuya, K., Adair-Rohani, H., ...Ezzati, M. (2012). A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. The Lancet, 380(9859), 2224-2260. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61766-8 [ Links ]

Martín-López, B., Iniesta-Arandia, I., García-Llorente, M., Palomo, I., Casado-Arzuaga, I., García del Amo, D., Gómez-Baggethum, E., …Montes, C. (2012). Uncovering ecosystem service bundles through social preferences. PloS ONE, 7(6), e38970. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038970 [ Links ]

Martínez, E., & Galindo-Leal, C. (2002). La vegetación de Calakmul, Campeche, México: clasificación, descripción y distribución. Boletín de la Sociedad Botánica de México, (71), 7-32. Retrieved from http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=57707101Links ]

Masera, O., Astier, M., & López-Ridaura, S. (2000). Sustentabilidad y manejo de recursos naturales. El marco de evaluación MESMIS. México: Mundi-Prensa S. A. de C. V. [ Links ]

Masera, O., & Fuentes, G. (2006). Introducción. In O. Masera (Ed.), La bioenergía en México, un catalizador del desarrollo sustentable. México: Comisión Nacional Forestal & Mundi-Prensa . [ Links ]

Miranda, F. (1978). Vegetación de la península yucateca; rasgos fisiográficos, la vegetación. México: Colegio de Postgraduados. [ Links ]

Neulinger, K. A., Alayón-Gamboa, J. A., & Reinhard-Vogl, Ch. (2014). Uso de la diversidad vegetal para su conservación en los huertos familiares de grupos étnicos en Calakmul, Campeche. In J. A. Alayón-Gamboa, & A. Morón-Ríos (Eds.), El huerto familiar: Un sistema socioecológico y biocultural para sustentar los modos de vida campesinos en Calakmul, México (pp. 56-73). México: El Colegio de la Frontera Sur . [ Links ]

Oroszi, S. (2004). The forest management of Transylvanian Saxons. Erdészettörténeti közlemények, 63, 1-153. Retrieved from http://epa.oszk.hu/02400/02451/00078/pdf/Links ]

Phillips, A. (2002). Directrices de manejo para las áreas protegidas de la categoría V de la UICN: Paisajes terrestres y marinos protegidos. Reino Unido: UICN Gland, Suiza and Cambridge. Retrieved from https://portals.iucn.org/library/efiles/documents/pag-009-es.pdfLinks ]

Piqué, H. R. (1999). Producción y uso del combustible vegetal: una evaluación arqueológica (vol. 3). Salamanca, España: Editorial CSIC-CSIC Press. [ Links ]

Poorter, L., Bongers, F., Aide, T. M., Zambrano, A. M. A., Balvanera, P., Becknell, J. M., ...Craven, D. (2016). Biomass resilience of Neotropical secondary forests. Nature, 530, 211-214. doi: 10.1038/nature16512 [ Links ]

Quiroz-Carranza, J., & Orellana, R. (2010). Uso y manejo de leña combustible en viviendas de seis localidades de Yucatán, México. Madera y Bosques, 16(2), 47-67 doi: 10.21829/myb.2010.1621172 [ Links ]

Ramanathan, V., & Carmichael, G. (2008). Global and regional climate changes due to black carbon. Nature Geoscience, 1(4), 221-227. doi: 10.1038/ngeo156 [ Links ]

Ramírez-López, J. M., Ramírez-Marcial, N., Cortina-Villar, H. S., & Castillo-Santiago, M. Á. (2012). Déficit de leña en comunidades cafetaleras de Chenalho, Chiapas. Ra Ximhai, 8(3), 27-39. Retrieved from http://revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rxm/article/view/53757/47857Links ]

Rössler, M. (2006). World heritage cultural landscapes: a UNESCO flagship programme 1992-2006. Landscape Research, 31(4), 333-353. doi: 10.1080/01426390601004210 [ Links ]

Rudel, T. K. (2013). The national determinants of deforestation in sub-Saharan Africa. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 368(1625). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0405 [ Links ]

Secretaría de Desarrollo Social (SEDESOL). (2013). Catálogo de entidades. Sistema de apoyo para la planeación. Unidad de Microregiones. Dirección General Adjunta de Planeación Microregional. Retrieved November 30, 2017, from http://www.microrregiones.gob.mx/catloc/Links ]

Serrano-Altamirano, V., Ruiz-Corral, A., Rodríguez-Ávila, J. H., Medina-García, G., & Cano-García, M. A. (2007). Estadísticas climáticas básicas de la península de Yucatán (periodo 1961-2003). Oaxaca, México: INIFAP-SAGARPA. [ Links ]

Sluyter, A. (2004). Los orígenes ecológicos y las consecuencias de la ganadería en la Nueva España durante el siglo XVI. De las marismas de Guadalquivir a la costa de Veracruz: Cinco perspectivas sobre cultura ganadera. Veracruz, México: Instituto Veracruzano de Cultura. [ Links ]

Smith, K. R. (2006). El uso doméstico de leña en los países en desarrollo y sus repercusiones en la salud. Unasylva, 57(224), 41-44. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/tempref/docrep/fao/009/a0789s/a0789s09.pdfLinks ]

Toledo, V. M. (2008). Uso múltiple y biodiversidad entre los mayas yucatecos, México. Interciencia, 33(5), 345-352. Retrieved from http://www.redalyc.org/pdf/339/33933505.pdfLinks ]

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2014). CONVENTION CONCERNING THE PROTECTION OF THE WORLD CULTURAL AND NATURAL HERITAGE. In Decisions adopted by the World Heritage Committee at its 38th session (Doha, Qatar, 2014). Retrieved from http://whc.unesco.org/archive/2014/whc14-38com-16en.pdfLinks ]

Vázquez-Calvo, M. A., Cruz-León, A., Santos-Cervantes, C., Pérez-Torres, M. A., & Sangerman-Jarquín, D. M. (2016). Estufas Lorena: uso de leña y conservación de la vegetación. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas, 16, 3159-3172. Retrieved from http://cienciasagricolas.inifap.gob.mx/editorial/index.php/agricolas/article/download/386/310/Links ]

Yescas-Albarrán, C. A., Cruz-León, A., Gómez-Uribe, M., Lara-Bueno, A., & Maldonado-Torres, R. (2016). Árboles nativos con potencial dendroenergético para el diseño de tecnologías agroforestales en Tepalcingo, Morelos. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas, 16, 3301-3313. Retrevied from http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=263146726012Links ]

Received: August 08, 2017; Accepted: January 24, 2018

*Corresponding author: pmacario@ecosur.mx tel.: +52 (983) 835 0440 ext. 4406

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License