SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.23 issue2Structure and diversity of tree vegetation in three reliefs on the Oaxaca coastHardening of Pinus oaxacana Mirov seedlings under irrigation management in nursery author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Revista Chapingo serie ciencias forestales y del ambiente

On-line version ISSN 2007-4018Print version ISSN 2007-3828

Rev. Chapingo ser. cienc. for. ambient vol.23 n.2 Chapingo May./Aug. 2017

http://dx.doi.org/10.5154/r.rchscfa.2016.05.032 

Review article

Some tree species of ecological importance in Mexico: A documentary review

Marín Pompa-García1  * 

José Á. Sigala Rodríguez2 

Enrique Jurado3 

1 Universidad Juárez del Estado de Durango, Facultad de Ciencias Forestales. Río Papaloapan y bulevar Durango s/n, col. Valle del Sur. C. P. 34120. Durango, Durango, México.

2Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias (INIFAP), Campo Experimental Valle del Guadiana. Carretera Durango-Mezquital, km 4.5. C. P. 34170. Durango, Durango, México.

3Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Facultad de Ciencias Forestales. Carretera Nacional km 145. C. P. 67700. Linares, Nuevo León, México.

Abstract

Introduction:

Mexico is known worldwide for its floristic diversity that has promoted interest in keeping record of the ecological importance of those species.

Objective:

This study shows a compilation of the scientific literature in which Mexican forest species are studied due to their importance, dominance, and abundance.

Materials and methods:

A total of 161 studies published from 1980 to 2015 were collected using specialized databases such as ISI Web of Science, Science Direct, Google Scholar, Latindex, SciELO and predefined keywords. Trends are analyzed and research perspectives are suggested to improve the current knowledge state on plant communities.

Results and discussion:

According to the analysis of the studies, the number of publications increased 46 % in the last five years. Mexican journals report the highest number of contributions (69 %), mainly focused on tropical deciduous forest (19 %). The dominant species are Quercus (Fagaceae), Pinus (Pinaceae), Acacia (Fabaceae) and Bursera (Burseraceae).

Conclusion:

The increase in publications in recent years is evidence of growing interest in this area; however, studies conducted for species or plant communities with some category of risk are rare in the literature.

Keywords: Composition; structure; ecological indexes; Mexican forest ecosystems; compilation; references

Introduction

Mexico is one of the four countries classified as megadiverse and hosts between 10 and 12 % of the planet's known terrestrial diversity (Sarukhán et al., 2009). Practically, all of the great vegetation types of the planet are found in this country (González-Medrano, 2003) and some ecosystems such as the wetlands of Cuatro Ciénegas, Coahuila, are unique in the world (Espinosa, Escalante, Eguiarte, & Soauza, 2005). This diversity of ecosystems is related to the heterogeneity of the physical environment, which in turn is the product of a complex geological and climatic history (Espinosa-Organista et al., 2008). The geographic location where two biogeographic regions converge, the Nearctic region and the Tropical region, has also favored a high degree of endemism in the Mexican flora (Rzedowski, 1991).

Some research keeps record of the ecological value of Mexican ecosystems, whether due to its diversity (Balvanera, Lott, Segura, Siebe, & Islas, 2002; Castillo-Campos, Halffter, & Moreno, 2008), distribution (Gelviz-Gelvez & Pavón-Hernández, 2013; Sánchez-González & López-Mata, 2003), degree of conservation (Encina-Domínguez, Encina-Domínguez, Mata-Rocha, & Valdes-Reyna, 2008; García-Arévalo, 2008; Huerta-Martínez & García-Moya, 2004; Santibañez-Andrade, Castillo-Argüero, & Martínez-Orea, 2015) or structural variables (Cuevas-Guzmán et al., 2011; Mora-Donjuán et al., 2013; Vázquez, López, Montalvo, Méndez, & Castillo, 2010). Moreover, Mexican forest ecosystems are a source of various environmental services (Comisión Nacional Forestal [CONAFOR], 2012), such as the regulation of climatic conditions, water cycle (Bonan, 2008) and carbon sequestration (Ordóñez & Masera, 2001; Torres & Guevara, 2002). The values of importance, indices of wealth, diversity, dominance and abundance have become indicators that qualify the ecological contribution of the species in the forest ecosystems (Clark & Covey, 2012; Duelli & Obrist, 2003).

In spite of the heterogeneity of the Mexican forest ecosystems (González-Medrano, 2003) and the studies that highlight the ecological value of the species present (Estrada, Yen, Delgado, & Villarreal, 2004; Trejo & Dirzo, 2002), there is currently a lack of a database that systematizes the studies; that is to say, there is no systematic, updated and accessible report that contributes to the knowledge of the subject and supports the scientists interested in this area of research.

Therefore, the main aim of this study is to develop and present an exhaustive bibliographical review on importance assessment, composition, dominance and abundance studies of Mexican forest species, in order to contribute to their diagnosis and perspectives.

Materials and Methods

An extensive and systematic literature review was developed on the subject of interest using databases such ISI Web of Science, Science Direct, Google Scholar, Sistema Regional de Información en Línea para Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal (Latindex) and Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO). For that purpose, different combinations of a predefined list of keywords were used: "importance value index", "dominance", "structure", "composition", "ecological indexes", "terrestrial ecosystems", "tree species" and "Mexico". The search was delimited from January 1980 to December 2015, taking into account only articles in indexed journals. Although valuable information exists in theses, technical reports, and conference abstracts, these documents were not considered due to the lack of a peer review process.

In order to ensure the reliability and comparability of the review, we verified that the articles included the following criteria: 1) scientific name of the species studied, 2) tree species (> 10 cm in diameter) to prevent misunderstanding with herbaceous or shrubs and 3) explicit description of the ecological indexes used to qualify the ecological relevance of the species under study.

Each document was recorded in a database using Microsoft Access 2010® and was classified by species, genus, family and ecosystem, the state where the study was developed, name of the journal, volume, number and query string were also recorded. A frequency analysis was conducted for each of the classification variables to define the most studied ecosystems, families, genera and species.

Results and Discussion

As a result of the review, a database was set up with 161 records of studies related to species of ecological importance in forest ecosystems in Mexico (Annex 1 available at https://chapingo.mx/revistas/xml/rchscfa/v23n2/markup_xml/scielo_package/2007-4018-rchscfa-23-02-00185-suppl.pdf) Articles were collected from 44 journals, 23 of these articles are Mexican publications and account for 69 % of the studies. More than 10 papers were collected from each one of five journals. The Journal Revista Chapingo Serie Ciencias Forestales y del Ambiente has the largest number of articles on the subject (Table 1). The oldest study found was Lott, Bullock, and Solis-Magallanes (1987), which corresponds to a study of diversity and structure in an area of tropical deciduous forest in Jalisco. Most of the articles were published in the decade from 2001 to 2010; however, there has been a considerable increase in the last five years (2011 to 2015).

Table 1 Peer reviewed scientific journals in which articles related to the study of forest species of ecological importance in Mexico have been published. 

Journal Country 1980-1990 1991-2000 2001-2010 2011-2015 Total
Revista Chapingo Serie Ciencias Forestales y del Ambiente Mexico 4 11 15
Polibotánica Mexico 7 6 13
Madera y Bosques Mexico 1 6 5 12
Boletín de la Sociedad Botánica de México Mexico 9 1 10
Forest Ecology and Management USA 2 7 1 10
Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad Mexico 2 8 10
Ciencia UANL Mexico 4 5 9
Acta Botánica Mexicana Mexico 3 1 4 8
Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Forestales Mexico 1 6 7
Vegetatio/Plant Ecology Internacional 3 3 6
Biodiversity and Conservation Internacional 5 5
Foresta Veracruzana Mexico 5 5
Interciencia Venezuela 4 1 5
Botanical Sciences Mexico 5 5
Anales del Instituto de Biología. Serie Botánica Mexico 4 4
Revista Iberoamericana de Ciencias USA 3 3
Universidad y Ciencia Mexico 3 3
Investigación Agraria: Sistemas y Recursos Forestales Spain 2 2
Journal of Vegetation Science Internacional 2 2
Kuxulkab' Mexico 1 1 2
Phyton Argentina 2 2
Others* 1 1 10 11 23
Total 4 7 75 75 161

*Journals with only one article was published.

Ecosystems studied

Of the 161 articles collected, 37 (about 19 %) were related to the study of species in the tropical deciduous forest (Rzedowski, 1978). The second ecosystem by study frequency is the pine-oak forest with 20 articles (Figure 1). The less studied ecosystems were those with smaller surface in the country such as the vegetation of petenes (known locally under that name) and coastal dunes.

Figure 1 Number of studies and families, genera and species cited as ecologically important per ecosystem (classification according to INEGI, 2015) in the period 1980-2015. SBC: Tropical deciduous forests, BPQ: Pine-oak forest, MET: Tamaulipan thornscrub, BM: Cloud forest, BP: Pine forest, SMQ: Tropical evergreen forest, SMS: Semi-evergreen seasonal forest, BQ: Oak forest, MSM: Submontane scrub, SMP: Seasonal evergreen forest, MG: Gallery forest, SAP: Tropical rain forest, BA: Oyamel fir forest, BQP: Oak-pine forest, MKX: Mezquital xerophilous vegetation; VM: Mangrove, MDM: Desert known in Mexico as Matorral desértico micrófilo, PN: Natural grassland vegetation, BS: Ayarin forest, MDR: desert known in Mexico as Matorral desértico rosetófilo, SBP: Thorn forest, SBQP: low semi-deciduous forests, SMC: Deciduous forest, MJ: Pinewood forest, BJ: Juniper forest, VU: Vegetation of coastal dunes, PI: Induced grassland, VPT: Vegetation of petenes, VS: Savanna. 

The largest number of families, genera and species studied is located in the tropical deciduous forests (Figure 1). This ecosystem has a wide distribution in the Mexican territory and is characterized by the dominance of extended treetops with heights between 7 and 8 m, and by a high density of shrub species (Trejo, 1999); furthermore, it is distinguished by its high diversity of species and endemic species (Rzedowski, 1991).

Figure 2 shows the number of studies per state. Most of the studies have been conducted in the state of Nuevo Leon (35) followed by Jalisco (17); in the first case, the number corresponds to studies in scrub ecosystems, such as Tamaulipan thornscrub (17) and submontane scrub (9), and pine-oak forests (13). In Jalisco, studies have been conducted mainly in the tropical deciduous forests (11).

Figure 2 Number of studies with indexes of ecological importance of arboreal species from the period 1980-2015 per state, in Mexico. 

Main Botanical Families

Figure 3 shows botanic families and their importance value index from the studies collected. The most frequently cited families were Fabaceae, Fagaceae, and Pinaceae; on the other hand, those cited only in one study were: Actinidiaceae, Annonaceae, Asteraceae, Cupressaceae, Meliaceae, Nyctaginaceae, Platanaceae, Polygonaceae, Rhizophoraceae, Rosaceae, Rubiaceae, Salicaceae, and Sapindaceae. The families found with higher value in the index of ecological importance (> 70) were Acanthaceae (Avicennia germinans [L.] Stearn), Rhizophoraceae (Rhizophora mangle L.), belonging to the mangrove ecosystems, and Apocynaceae with the genus Tabernaemontana in the tropical deciduous forests. The families with a higher number of studies (Fagaceae, Fabaceae, and Pinaceae) showed values of average importance from 27 to 34.

Figure 3 Frequency of studies per botanical family and index of value of average importance in ecosystems of Mexico in the period 1980-2015. *Families without IVI cited in the studies. 

Main Genus and Species

According to Figure 4, the most frequently cited genus were Quercus (Fagaceae), Pinus (Pinaceae) and Acacia (Fabaceae), which is consistent with the family analysis. Another important genus was Bursera (Burseraceae) characteristic of the tropical deciduous forests. In relation to the importance value index at the genus level, Sabal has obtained the highest value, although this was only found in two studies carried out in the petenes and the deciduous forest. Haematoxylum, common in the tropical deciduous forest, had also high values of importance. Hymenaea, Avicenia, Pseudotsuga and Enterolobium had values of importance greater than 100, although these values were only recorded in one study.

Figure 4 Main genera of ecological importance and their average IVI value, found in Mexican forest ecosystems in the period 1980-2015. *Genus without cited IVI. 

The families with a higher number of genera recorded were Fabaceae, Euphorbiaceae, and Asteraceae. Although the family Fagaceae was the most frequent in the studies, only present two genera (Quercus and Fagus). Figure 5 includes the most frequent species, among which are: Bursera simaruba (L.) Sarg., Pinus pseudostrobus Lindl. and Havardia pallens (Benth.), as well as some species of the genus Quercus such as Q. rugosa Née and Q. laurina Humb. & Bonpl.

Figure 5 Main tree species cited as ecologically important in Mexican ecosystems in the period 1980-2015. 

There are a lot of studies that keep record and value the ecological importance of tree species in Mexico. Most of the research has been developed from a perspective of ecosystem structure analysis, with two directions. On the one hand, some describe the current condition that keeps a particular ecosystem and highlights the species of greater abundance and dominance under certain conditions of site or station quality. In contrast, other studies provide ecological indicators that explain the structural condition of forests that have been disturbed by both anthropogenic and natural factors. The two perspectives of analysis have differed in recent years; thus, the first studies conducted in the 1980s, such as those by Lott et al. (1987); Bongers, Popma, Meave-Castillo, and Carabias (1988); Popma, Bongers, and Meave-Castillo (1988); and Arriaga and León-de la Luz (1989) in tropical forests, are distinguished because they describe the structural condition and diversity that these ecosystems preserve. On the other hand, since 2000, and especially in the last five years, the studies deal with aspects of the impact of anthropogenic and natural factors on forest structure, such as those conducted by Alanís-Rodríguez et al. (2008), Alanís-Rodríguez et al. (2008), Alanís-Rodríguez et al. (2010a), Alanís-Rodríguez et al. (2010b) y Alanís-Rodríguez, Jiménez-Pérez, Valdecantos-Dema, Aguirre-Calderón, and Treviño-Garza (2011). These papers analyze the diversity and tree structure of the forests in Nuevo León affected by forest fires.

The dissemination of research has diversified over time. The oldest studies recorded in this review correspond to international journals such as Plant Ecology (formerly known as “Vegetatio”), a trend that was maintained in the 1990s with the exception of three articles published in Acta Botánica Mexicana. It seems that the creation of new journals, the diversification of contents and their inclusion in indexes such as JCR (Journal Citation Reports), such as the case of the journal Revista Chapingo Series Ciencias Forestales y del Ambiente, has allowed research scientists to publish articles in national journals, together with the predominant Spanish language in these journals and perhaps the commitment of the Mexican research scientists to publish in national journals.

With regard to the number of publications, the trend has been increasing over the last five years, which may reflect a growing interest in the subject matter. Although an analysis of the reasons for such a trend goes beyond the scope of this study, it seems that in part this could be attributed to the anthropogenic and climatic vulnerability to which forest ecosystems undergo (Weber, Bugmann, Fonti, Rigling, 2008; Williams et al., 2013), without neglecting their economic importance and government support that motivate to improve the understanding of their structural variables. On the other hand, the consolidation of research groups on these topics (Table 1) could also have caused the growing number of publications. To our knowledge, this is the first effort recording the studies at the national level, where ecological structural variables of some tree species are studied (Figures 1, 3 and 4). This provides a starting point with a synthesis of the research landscape of the structural ecology of plant communities and gives a perspective on the subject to research scientists.

The ecosystem with a higher concentration of studies is the tropical deciduous forest (Annex 1). One of the possible reasons why this ecosystem arouses the interest of research scintists is perhaps its high diversity of species (Bullock & Solis-Magallanes, 1990). Most of the studies of the tropical deciduous forest have been carried out in Jalisco (11 studies), usually conducted by the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México at the Estación Biológica Chamela, although this ecosystem has also been studied in other states of the country. This allows us to assume that, coincidentally, the studies have been spatially distributed according to their proximity to the area of influence of the research institutions. For example, Nuevo León is the entity with the highest number of studies, mostly carried out by research scintists from the Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, mainly conducted in the Parque Ecológico Chipinque and the Tamaulipan thornscrub.

The families with higher frequency in the literature are Fabaceae, Fagaceae and Pinaceae, which coincides with the high number of species belonging to these families (19,400, 670 and 220, respectively, according to http://www.naturalista.mx/), and wide distribution (Rzedowski, 1991). The Fabaceae family belongs to the leguminous (Fabales) group, the second most diverse group in Mexico (Sousa & Delgado, 1993), and has an important ecological and socioeconomic role in the different ecosystems (Estrada-Castillón et al., 2010). From this family, A. farnesiana, known in Mexico as huizache, is common in thornscrub forest (Miranda & Hernández-Xolocotzi, 1963); it has also been described as a species that can colonize disturbed areas (Estrada-Castillón & Martínez-Muñoz, 2000), making it the most abundant in the scrubs in the short term, after a disturbance.

The family Fagaceae is present practically all over the world and the genus Quercus is its most numerous genera with 161 species distributed in Mexico (Valencia, 2004). In the same way, the family Pinaceae is one of the most important ecologically and economically in Mexico (Rzedowski, 1991; Styles, 1993). The genus Pinus is the most widely distributed and is often the dominant component in temperate and cold ecosystems, which influence the ecosystem's functional processes, such as biogeochemical, hydrological, and fire regimes (Sánchez-González, 2008).

The family Burseraceae, characteristic of the tropical deciduous forest, is also subject matter in the studies, represented mainly by the genus Bursera (Miranda & Hernández-Xolocotzi, 1963); B. simaruba is the most frequently studied species (Figure 5). Rzedowski, Medina, and Calderón (2007) cite it as a widely distributed taxon in the American continent; however, these authors indicate that it is a plant whose morphological variation makes identification difficult.

It is important to highlight that the studies carried out on species or plant communities with some category of risk in NOM-059-SEMARNAT-2010 (Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales [SEMARNAT], 2010) appear rarely in the literature. Some species of temperate ecosystems, such as those of the genera Abies and Picea or species characteristic of mangroves, are scarcely published. This highlights the need to characterize the structure of these populations or communities to design management strategies for proper conservation. We do not discard additional efforts that delve into the description of structural attributes, quantification methods, types of research (descriptive, comparative or experimental research) of each publication, assessing the successional trajectories of plant communities in a temporal and spatial manner.

Conclusions

The species commonly studied belong to the genus Quercus, Pinus, Acacia and Bursera, and most studies focus on the tropical deciduous forest. This review represents the first effort to provide a perspective on the tree species that have been recorded more frequently in the Mexican scientific literature, with quantitative forest parameters. Therefore, the study contributes to the knowledge of plant communities and serves as a base of support for researchers in the subject matter. The increase in publications in recent years is evidence of growing interest in this area; however, it is important to highlight that the studies carried out for species or plant communities with some category of risk are rare in the literature.

Acknowledgments

This study was possible thanks to the financing of the CONACYT Project 222522. The authors wish to acknowledge the effort of anonymous reviewers, whose recommendations improved the version of the manuscript.

References

Alanís-Rodríguez, E., Aguirre-Calderón, O., Jiménez-Pérez, J., Pando-Moreno, M., Treviño-Garza, E., Aranda-Ramos, R., & Canizales-Velázquez, P. (2010a). Efecto de la severidad del fuego sobre la regeneración asexual de especies leñosas de un ecosistema mixto (Pinus-Quercus) en el Parque Ecológico Chipinque, México. Interciencia, 35(9), 690-695. doi: 6900378-1844/10/09/690-06 [ Links ]

Alanís-Rodríguez, E., Jiménez-Pérez, J., Espinoza-Vizcarra, D., Jurado-Ybarra, E., Aguirre-Calderón, O., & González-Tagle, M. (2008). Evaluación del estrato arbóreo en un área restaurada post-incendio en el Parque Ecológico Chipinque, México. Revista Chapingo Serie Ciencias Forestales y del Ambiente, 14(2), 113-118. Retrieved from https://chapingo.mx/revistas/forestales/contenido.php?id_revista_numero=38Links ]

Alanís-Rodríguez, E., Jiménez-Pérez, J., Pando-Moreno, M., Aguirre-Calderón, O., Treviño-Garza, E., & Canizales-Velázquez, P. (2010b). Análisis de la diversidad arbórea en áreas restauradas post-incendio en el Parque Ecológico Chipinque, México. Acta Biológica Colombiana, 15(2), 309-324. Retrieved from http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=319027885021Links ]

Alanís-Rodríguez, E., Jiménez-Pérez, J., Valdecantos-Dema, A., Aguirre-Calderón, O., & Treviño-Garza, E. (2011). Caracterización de regeneración leñosa post-incendio de un ecosistema templado del Parque Ecológico Chipinque, México. Revista Chapingo Serie Ciencias Forestales y del Ambiente. doi: 10.5154/r.rchscfa.2010.05.032 [ Links ]

Arriaga, L., & León-de la Luz, J. (1989). The Mexican tropical deciduous forest of Baja California Sur : A floristic and structural approach. Vegetatio, 45-52. doi: 10.1007/BF00054664 [ Links ]

Balvanera, P., Lott, E., Segura, G., Siebe, C., & Islas, A. (2002). Patterns of β-diversity in a Mexican tropical dry forest. Journal of Vegetation Science, 13(2), 145-158. doi: 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2002.tb02034.x [ Links ]

Bonan, G. B. (2008). Forests and climate change: Forcings, feedbacks, and the climate benefits of forests. Science, 320(5882), 1444-1449. doi: 10.1126/science.1155121 [ Links ]

Bongers, F., Popma, J., Meave-Castillo, J., & Carabias, J. (1988). Structure and floristic composition of the lowland rain forest of Los Tuxtlas, Mexico. Vegetatio, 74(1), 55-80. doi: 10.1007/BF00045614 [ Links ]

Bullock, S. H., & Solis-Magallanes, J. A. (1990). Phenology of canopy trees of a tropical deciduous forest in Mexico. Biotropica, 22(1), 22-35. doi: 10.2307/2388716 [ Links ]

Castillo-Campos, G., Halffter, G., & Moreno, C. E. (2008). Primary and secondary vegetation patches as contributors to floristic diversity in a tropical deciduous forest landscape. Biodiversity and Conservation, 17(7), 1701-1714. doi: 10.1007/s10531-008-9375-7 [ Links ]

Clark, J. A., & Covey, K. R. (2012). Tree species richness and the logging of natural forests: A meta-analysis. Forest Ecology and Management, 276, 146-153. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.04.001 [ Links ]

Comisión Nacional Forestal (CONAFOR). (2012). Logros y perspectivas del desarrollo forestal en México 2007-2012. Zapopan, Jalisco: Autor. Retrieved from http://www.conafor.gob.mx:8080/biblioteca/ver.aspx?articulo=489Links ]

Cuevas-Guzmán, R., Cisneros-Lepe, E., Jardel-Peláez, E., Sánchez-Rodríguez, E., Guzmán-Hernández, L., Rodríguez-Guerrero, C., & Núñez-López, N. (2011). Análisis estructural y de diversidad en los bosques de Abies de Jalisco, México. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad, 82, 1219-1233. Retrieved from http://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/rmbiodiv/v82n4/v82n4a16.pdfLinks ]

Duelli, P., & Obrist, M. K. (2003). Biodiversity indicators: The choice of values and measures. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 98(1-3), 87-98. doi: 10.1016/S0167-8809(03)00072-0 [ Links ]

Encina-Domínguez, J. A., Encina-Domínguez, F., Mata-Rocha, E., & Valdes-Reyna, J. (2008). Aspectos estructurales, composición florística y caracterización ecológica del bosque de oyamel de la Sierra de Zapalinamé, Coahuila, México. Boletín de La Sociedad Botánica de México, 83, 13-24. Retrieved from http://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/bsbm/n83/n83a2.pdfLinks ]

Espinosa, L., Escalante, A., Eguiarte, A., & Soauza, V. (2005). El mar en el desierto y su importancia para la conservación. Biodiversitas, 58, 7-11. Retrieved from http://www.biodiversidad.gob.mx/Biodiversitas/Articulos/biodiv58art2.pdfLinks ]

Espinosa-Organista, D., Ocegueda-Cruz, S., Aguilar-Zúñiga, C., Flores-Villela, Ó., Llorente-Bousquets, J., & Vázquez-Benítez, B. (2008). El conocimiento biogeográfico de las especies y su regionalización natural. En J. Sarukhán (Ed.), Capital natural de México (vol. 1, pp. 22-65). México: Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad. [ Links ]

Estrada-Castillón, E., Delgado-Salinas, A., Villarreal Q. J. Á., Scott, M. L., Cantú, A., C., & García, P. J. (2010). Diversity and distributional patterns of legumes in Northeastern Mexico. The Southwestern Naturalist, 55(3), 426-433. doi: 10.1894/JB-13.1 [ Links ]

Estrada-Castillón, E., & Martínez-Muñoz, A. (2000). Legumes from the central part of the state of Chihuahua, Mexico. SIDA, Contributions to Botany, 19(2), 351-360. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/41968944Links ]

Estrada, C. E., Yen, M. C., Delgado, S. A., & Villarreal, Q. J. (2004). Leguminosas del centro del estado de Nuevo León, México. Anales del Instituto de Biología. Serie Botánica, 75(1), 73-85. Retrieved from http://www.ejournal.unam.mx/bot/075-01/BOT75105.pdfLinks ]

García-Arévalo, A. (2008). Vegetación y flora de un bosque relictual de Picea Chihuahuana del norte de México. Polibotánica, 25, 45-68. Retrieved from http://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/polib/n25/n25a5.pdfLinks ]

Gelviz-Gelvez, S., & Pavón-Hernández, N. (2013). Diversidad de especies arbustivas en una zona semiárida del centro de México. Revista Chapingo Serie Ciencias Forestales y del Ambiente, 19(3), 323-335. doi: 10.5154/r.rchscfa.2012.08.049 [ Links ]

González-Medrano, F. (2003). Las comunidades vegetales de México. Propuesta para la unificación de la clasificación y nomenclatura de la vegetación de México. México: Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales - Instituto Nacional de Ecología. [ Links ]

Huerta-Martínez, F., & García-Moya, E. (2004). Diversidad de especies perennes y su relación con el ambiente en un área semiárida del centro de México: implicaciones para la conservación. Interciencia, 29(8), 435-441. Retrieved from http://www.scielo.org.ve/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0378-18442004000800008Links ]

Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (INEGI). (2015). Cartas de uso de suelo y vegetación. México. Retrieved January 11, 2017 from http://www.inegi.org.mx/geo/contenidos/recnat/usosuelo/Carta_suelo.aspxLinks ]

Lott, E., Bullock, S., & Solis-Magallanes, A. (1987). Floristic diversity and structure of upland and Arroyo Forests of Coastal Jalisco. Biotropica, 19(3), 228-235. doi: 10.2307/2388340 [ Links ]

Miranda, F., & Hernández-Xolocotzi, E. (1963). Los tipos de vegetación de México y su clasificación. Boletín de la Sociedad Botánica de México, 28, 20-179. [ Links ]

Mora-Donjuán, C. A., Alanís-Rodríguez, E., Jiménez-Pérez, J., González-Tagle, M., Yerena-Yamallel, J. I., & Cuellar-Rodríguez, L. G. (2013). Estructura, composición florística y diversidad del matorral espinoso tamaulipeco, México. Ecología Aplicada, 12(1), 29-34. Retrieved from http://www.scielo.org.pe/scielo.php?pid=S1726-22162013000100004&script=sci_arttextLinks ]

Ordóñez, J. A., & Masera, O. (2001). Captura de carbono ante el cambio climático. Madera y Bosques, 7(1), 3-12. Retrieved from http://www.redalyc.org/pdf/617/61770102.pdfLinks ]

Popma, J., Bongers, F., & Meave-Castillo, J. (1988). Patterns in the vertical structure of the tropical lowland rain forest of Los Tuxtlas, Mexico. Vegetatio, 74(1), 81-91. doi: 10.1007/BF00045615 [ Links ]

Rzedowski, J. (1978). Vegetación de México (1ra. ed.). México: Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad . [ Links ]

Rzedowski, J. (1991). El endemismo en la flora fanerogámica mexicana: una apreciación analítica preliminar. Acta Botánica Mexicana, 15, 47-64. Retrieved from http://www.redalyc.org/pdf/574/57401505.pdfLinks ]

Rzedowski, J., Medina, L. R., & Calderón, R. G. (2007). Segunda restauración de Bursera ovalifolia y nombre nuevo para otro componente del complejo de B. simaruba (Burseraceae). Acta Botánica Mexicana, 81, 45-70. Retrieved from http://www.redalyc.org/pdf/574/57408104.pdfLinks ]

Sánchez-González, A. (2008). Una visión actual de la diversidad y distribución de los pinos de México. Madera y Bosques, 14(1), 107-120. [ Links ]

Sánchez-González, A., & López-Mata, L. (2003). Clasificación y ordenación de la vegetación del norte de la Sierra Nevada, a lo largo de un gradiente altitudinal. Anales del Instituto de Biología. Serie Botánica, 74(1), 47-71. Retrieved from http://www.www.biblioteca.org.ar/libros/90684.pdfLinks ]

Santibañez-Andrade, G., Castillo-Argüero, S., & Martínez-Orea, Y. (2015). Evaluación del estado de conservación de la vegetación de los bosques de una cuenca heterogénea del Valle de México. Bosque, 36(2), 299-313. doi: 10.4067/S0717-92002015000200015 [ Links ]

Sarukhán, J., Koleff, P., Carabias, J., Soberón, J., Dirzo, R., Llorente-Bousquets, J., De la Maza, J. (2009). Capital natural de México: conocimiento actual, evaluación y perspectivas de sustentabilidad. Síntesis. México: Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad . [ Links ]

Secretaría de medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales (SEMARNAT). (2010). Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-059-SEMARNAT-2010, Protección ambiental-Especies nativas de México de flora y fauna silvestres-Categorías de riesgo y especificaciones para su inclusión, exclusión o cambio-Lista de especies en riesgo. Diario Oficial de la Federación. México. Retrieved from http://www.profepa.gob.mx/innovaportal/file/435/1/nom_059_semarnat_2010.pdfLinks ]

Sousa, S., & Delgado, S. (1993). Mexican Leguminosae: Phytogeography, endemism, and origins. In T. P. Ramamoorthy, R. Bye, A. Lot, & J. Fa (Eds.), Biological diversity of Mexico: Origins and distribution (pp. 459-511). New York: Oxford University Press. [ Links ]

Styles, B. T. (1993). Genus Pinus: A Mexican purview. In T. P. Ramamoorthy, R. Bye, A. Lot, & J. Fa (Eds.), Biological diversity of Mexico: Origin and distribution (pp. 397-420). New York: Oxford University Press. [ Links ]

Torres, R. J. M., & Guevara, S. A. (2002). El potencial de México para la producción de servicios ambientales: captura de carbono y desempeño hidráulico. Gaceta Ecológica, 63, 40-59. Retrieved from http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=53906303Links ]

Trejo, V. I. (1999). El clima de la selva baja caducifolia en México. Investigaciones Geográficas, 39, 40-52. Retrieved from http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=56903903Links ]

Trejo, I., & Dirzo, R. (2002). Floristic diversity of Mexican seasonally dry tropical forests. Biodiversity and Conservation, 11(1), 2063-2084. doi: 10.1023/A:1020876316013 [ Links ]

Valencia, A. S. (2004). Diversidad del género Quercus (Fagaceae) en México. Boletín de la Sociedad Botánica de México, 75, 33-53. Retrieved from http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=57707503Links ]

Vázquez, N. I., López, P. D., Montalvo, U. H., Méndez, S. C., & Castillo, A. O. (2010). Estructura y composición florística de vegetación inundable en la División Académica de Ciencias Biológicas, Villahermosa, Tabasco. Kuxulkab’, 17(31), 21−30. Retrieved from http://www.revistas.ujat.mx/index.php/kuxulkab/article/view/395/316Links ]

Weber, P., Bugmann, H., Fonti, P., & Rigling, A. (2008). Using a retrospective dynamic competition index to reconstruct forest succession. Forest Ecology and Management, 254(1), 96-106. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.07.031 [ Links ]

Williams, P. A., Allen, C. D., Macalady, A. K., Griffin, D., Woodhouse, C. A., Meko, D. M., McDowell, N. G. (2013). Temperature as a potent driver of regional forest drought stress and tree mortality. Nature Climate Change, 3(3), 292-297. doi: 10.1038/nclimate1693 [ Links ]

Received: May 24, 2016; Accepted: January 26, 2017

* Corresponding autor: e-mail: marinpompagarcia@gmail.comTel.: 52+ (618) 1301096.

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License