SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.6 número especialLos últimos 50 años de Salmonella en México: Fuentes de aislamiento y factores que influyen en su prevalencia y diversidadCapacidad de adherencia e índice de invasión de cepas de L. monocytogenes aisladas de alimentos y casos clínicos en México índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Revista bio ciencias

versión On-line ISSN 2007-3380

Revista bio ciencias vol.6 spe Tepic  2019  Epub 14-Nov-2019

https://doi.org/10.15741/revbio.06.nesp.e522 

Original Articles

Estimating the health risk assessment of the consumption of Oreochromis niloticus, tap water, surface water and prey sediments, contaminated with heavy metals in communities close to a copper mine and to Adolfo Ruiz Cortines dam, in Sonora, Mexico.

A. P. Balderrama-Carmona1  * 

Y. Bisher-Álvarez1 

N. P. Silva-Beltrán2 

P. A. Ayala-Parra1 

X. Felipe-Ortega-Fonseca1 

1Universidad de Sonora, Departamento de Ciencias Químico Biológicas y Agropecuarias, Unidad Regional Sur, Navojoa, Sonora, México.

2Universidad de Sonora. Campus Cajeme. Departamento de Ciencias de la Salud, Cajeme, Sonora, México.


Abstract

Food chain alteration with heavy metals is one of the most important concerns in public health and food safety. This research reports the first monitoring of heavy metals in the Adolfo Ruiz Cortines dam in Alamos, municipality of Sonora, Mexico. Concentrations of Arsenic (As), Lead (Pb), Mercury (Hg) and Copper (Cu) were analyzed by atomic absorption spectrophotometry coupled to the hydride generation system. A health risk assessment was carried out calculating cumulative doses of As and Pb in tap water, Oreochromis niloticus (known as tilapia) and dam sediments. The results of this research reveal that the most important source of arsenic in humans is Oreochromis niloticus and for lead it is the consumption of tap water. Children are the most affected population, reaching a cumulative risk index for exposure to Pb of HIc = 3.30 and for As of HIc = 7.35. This study estimated that communities close to Adolfo Ruiz Cortines dam, present a potential health risk due to the consumption of O. niloticus, tap water and dam sediments contaminated with Pb and As.

Key words: Heavy metals; mining pollution; arsenic; lead; tilapia

Resumen

La contaminación de la cadena alimenticia con metales pesados es una de las preocupaciones más importantes en salud pública e inocuidad alimentaria. Esta investigación reporta el primer monitoreo de metales pesados en la presa Adolfo Ruiz Cortines perteneciente al municipio de Álamos, Sonora, México. Las concentraciones de Arsénico (As), Plomo (Pb), Mercurio (Hg) y Cubre (Cu) se analizaron mediante espectrofotometría de absorción atómica acoplada a generador de hidruros. Se realizó una evaluación de riesgos a la salud calculando las dosis de As y Pb cumulativas en agua de grifo, Oreochromis niloticus y sedimentos costeros. Los resultados de esta investigación revelan que la fuente más importante de arsénico es Oreochromis niloticus y de plomo es el consumo de agua de grifo. La población más afectada son los niños, alcanzando un índice de riesgo cumulativo por exposición a Pb de HIc= 3.302388 y para As de HIc=7.351969. En este estudio se estimó que en las comunidades cercanas a la presa Adolfo Ruiz Cortines existe un riesgo potencial a la salud por consumo de O. niloticus, agua de grifo y sedimentos costeros contaminados con Pb y As.

Palabras clave: Metales pesados; contaminación minera; arsénico; plomo; tilapia

Introduction

Heavy metals are contaminants that may affect the health of human beings, animal and vegetal species due to their toxicity, persistence and bioaccumulation properties (Yi et al., 2011). Contamination of the food chain is the most relevant route of exposure in individuals (Ratul et al., 2018), which is why the removal of heavy metals in food and water is one of the main challenges for food safety (WHO, 2013).

Mining activities, manufacturing processes, combustion and pesticides are the main sources generating significant concentrations of heavy metals. These pollutants are discharged in water bodies, which are biomagnified (Wuana & Okieimen, 2011; Liu et al., 2018), in turn, these metals can be deposited in sediments and stored in riverbeds, and also infiltrated in underground water (Yi et al., 2011; Wongsasuluk et al., 2014).

Locations close to mines have been reported in worldwide scientific literature to contain metals at levels exceeding criteria for potable and surface water (Calla & Cabrera, 2010; Yi et al., 2011; Wongsasuluk et al., 2014; Modoi et al., 2014). High concentrations of metals in the organism of living beings affect the biochemical and physiological processes producing diverse pathologies. Chronic exposition to heavy metals can produce lesions in skin, neurological disorders, diabetes, cardiovascular problems and cancers (Tchounwou et al., 2012).

Adolfo Ruiz Cortines dam is located in the southern of Sonora, is also known as “El Mocúzarit,” whose waters are used for irrigation of crops of Valle del Mayo region. Part of this water reserve is even used in the watertreatment plant of Huatabampo municipality. At scarce meters from this dam, a private copper mine is installed, providing jobs to hundreds of habitants from Álamos and Navojoa municipalities. Communities of less than 400 people live in adjacent places to the dam and the mine, and also drink water from wells and consume fish from dam areas near to the copper mine.

In this study are detailed results of heavy metal analysis (As, Pb, Hg, and Cu) in surface water, dam sediment and Oreochromis niloticus (tilapia) from the Alfredo Ruiz Cortines dam and from tap water of Piedras Verdes and Conicárit communities nearby the dam and the copper mine. The objective of this research study was to assess human health risks for consuming O. niloticus, tap water and costal sediments contaminated with heavy metals in communities adjacent to a copper mine and to Adolfo Ruiz Cortines dam in Alamos, Sonora, Mexico.

Materials and Methods

Geographic location

In this study, heavy metals monitoring was performed for 9 months (including rainy and dry seasons) with a two-month frequency of As, Cu, Hg, Pb in surface water, tap water, sediment and fish in Adolfo Ruiz Cortines dam since May 2017 until March 2018. All the samples were collected in five strategic points: tap water was sampled in Conicárit and Piedras Verdes communities and surface water and dam sediments were sampled from the site where water is discharged from the mine, from the dock of fishermen’s barges and from the area of cattle breeding (Figure 1).

Figure 1 Satellite image of the location of the 5 sample points next to Adolfo Ruiz Cortines Dam (ArcGIS Pro, 2017).  

Studied population

A total of 686 habitants was estimated to live in Conicárit and Piedras Verdes populations. Population size was assessed with a margin of error of 10 % and a confidence level of 90 % using statistic software Epi Info 7.2 with the purpose of performing a transversal study by means of consumption, health and symptomatology surveys (age, weight, sex, diseases, etc.) in these localities to estimate patterns of water and food consumption (size of portions and frequency of food intake).

Sampling

Water and sediment were sampled in polyethylene bottles, previously washed with concentrated nitric acid and distilled water (1:1). Regarding water, samples (tap water and surface water), they were sampled from the surface, taking care of not incorporating soil, next were added after sampling 0.5 mL of nitric acid free of metals (Omnitrace), for preservation. The sediments dam ware collected from the marine surface riverbed (20 cm) and for fish being the highest sale and consumption; tilapia (O. niloticus) samples were bought in the area of anglers’ barges, the fishes were saved in polyethylene bags with zipper until reaching the laboratory. Samples were kept refrigerated until its analysis in the Biochemistry and Toxicology laboratory (BTL) of the University of Sonora, south regional campus.

Heavy metals analysis

Samples were transported in an icebox until reached BTL. Samples where were digested by wet chemistry analysis with nitric acid at 70 %. Atomic absorption spectrophotometry coupled to a hydride generation system (DOF, 2018) was used to quantify heavymetals. The analysis was performed by duplicates and with its respective blank reagents and standard solutions as quality control, processed according to the NMX-AA051-SCFI-2016 standard. Detection limits of the method were the following (µg metal/L): Pb (200), Cu (4), Hg (1.27) and As (0.92). In Figure 1 the strategic sampling points are illustrated.

Health risk assessment

To assess health risk, an Exposure Assessment Model was implemented (US EPA, 2009) for AS, Cu, Hg and Pb consumption in O. niloticus, surface water, tap water, coastal sediments. To calculate the dose for each source, the following formula was used (US EPA, 1989; CIDA, 2009):

Dose water, sediments,fish= C x I x AF x Th x Td x TwPc x 16 x 365

Where: C (mg kg-1 ó mg L-1), is heavy metal concentration in sediments or in water (calculation is done in both sources using the highest determined concentration); I (kg or L per day), is the water or sediment intake in children and adults; AF, is the absorption factor in the gastrointestinal tract (a value of 1 is used); Th (hours), hours of exposure per day (0-16); Td, days of exposure in a week (0-7); Tw, weeks of exposure in a year (0-52); Pc (kg), individual body weight. The dose is the quantity of heavy metals ingested per kilograms of body weight in a day (mg kg-1 día-1).

Cumulative Risk Index (Hlc) was calculated according to the following equation:

Hlc= DoseRfD

Reference dose RfD in mg kg-1 día-1 was 0.0035 for lead, 0.0003 for arsenic, 0.04 for copper and 0.0003 for mercury (HC, 2012; WHO, 2017, US EPA, 2017). A potential health risk was considered when Hlc was higher than 0.2 (HC, 2012).

Data analysis

Surveys were analyzed using the statistic software Epi Info 7.2. Averages and geometrical means were obtained using Excel, 2017. Risk analysis was performed using Risk Calculation Tools software (CIDA, 2009).

Results and Discussion

This work results from the first monitoring of heavy metals in Adolfo Ruiz Cortines “El Mocúzarit” dam. In the transversal study performed in Piedras Verdes and Conicárit (n=85), survey respondents were 42 % men and 58 % women, which ranged between 3 and 65 years (mothers responded to surveys for their minor children). Surveys indicated that tilapia fished in the dam is the highest consumed food; which is consumed at least three times a week (97 %); water intake in men, women and children, survey respondents declared they consume 2, 1.2 and 0.7 liters of tap water per day, respectively. As well, surveys asserted that families use the dam for recreational activities; among the visited families the main economic activity of householders is fishing (60 %).

Monitoring results indicate values in tap water from 0.0155 to 45.81 ppm of Pb, 0.00092 to 0.0302 ppm of As and for Hg and Cu, values were below detection limit <0.00127 and <0.004 ppm, respectively. Regarding values reported in O. niloticus, results ranged between 0.2 and 27.5 ppm of Pb, 0.181 to 1.187 ppm of As, in these samples values of Hg and Cu were also below detection limit. Concentrations in sediments for Pb were from 0.115 to 81.5 ppm, for As 0.6695 to 3.958 ppm, for Cu 3.95 to 78.05 ppm and for mercury below detection limit of the equipment. Concentrations in surface water for Pb ranged between 0.075 and 2.62 ppm, for As 0.00092 to 0.0302 ppm and Hg and Cu were below the detection limit. Averages and geometrical means of results are shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Heavy metals (Pb, As, Hg and Cu) concentrations (in ppm) of surface and tap water, coastal sediment and Oreochromis niloticus

PPM Dam water Tap water Sediment O. niloticus
Pb AV 0.4955 5.837 18.847 9.295
MG 0.268 0.188 2.397 1.006
As AV 0.01164 0.01108 2.469 1.0361
MG 0.0064 0.0041 2.1809 0.7096
Hg AV 0.00127 0.00127 0.00127 0.00127
MG 0.00127 0.00127 0.00127 0.00127
Cu AV 0.004 0.004 38.783 0.004
MG 0.004 0.004 21.959 0.004

AV: average; MG: geometric mean. Numbers in bold represent averages above Mexican standard (NOM-127-SSA1-1994; NOM-001-SEMARNAT-1996).

According to Mexican standard (NOM-127-SSA1-1994), the permissible limit (PL) of Pb is 0.01 ppm or mg.L-1 in potable water, results in this study are higher than PL in 100% of the analyzed samples. Regarding As levels, results were higher than PL of 0.025 ppm, in May and October 2017. Hg and Cu PL were 0.001 and 2 ppm, respectively in potable water, which were not exceeded at the monitoring, performed in the current research (DOF, 2018b).

In previous studies in regions close to those studied in this research (around 250 km), values of 0.05-0.12 ppm of Pb and of 0.002-0.305 ppm of As were calculated in potable water, similar results were given for arsenic in the current research; however, lead concentrations were higher in the current research (Wyatt et al., 1998). In coastal sediments, in San Pedro river, Sonora, Pb levels of 40-60 ppm were reported (Gómez-Álvarez et al., 2004), which were higher than those found, in average, in the current study.

To assess health risk in communities, exposure variables have to be established, which are presented in Table 2; moreover, it was taken into account that people consume tilapia three times a week and absorption factors considered for As and Pb were 0.03 and 0.006, respectively (HC, 2012). Children were considered to play and bathe on the shore of the dam and householders fishermen’s hands were considered to be in contact with coastal sediments at least 24 days per year. Three different scenarios were assessed: risk in children and adults, the last ones differentiated by gender (men and women), no distinction was made among adults’ age.

Table 2 Considered variables for health risk assessment of heavy metal consumption and exposure (Pb and As). 

Assumptions Children Women Men
Water consumption (L/day)*1 0.7 1.2 2
Costal sediment consumption (g/day)*2 8x10-4 2x10-4 2x10-4
Dermic contact with sediment (cm2)*3 3620 890 N/A
O. niloticus consumption (g)*4 50 100 150
Body weight (kg)*5 15 60 75

*1,4 and 5 Variables from the transversal study.

*2 Exposure factors handbook (US EPA, 2011).

*3 PQRA 2004 model from Canadian Minister of Health.

Risk index was calculated only for As and Pb, for the reasons previously mentioned. In Figures 1 and 3, risk index was observed on each one of the samples where, according to the resulting calculations, the main source of arsenic is fish consumption and the main source of lead is tap water intake, children being the most affected population.

Figure 2 Risk index of contamination by Arsenic source in: children, men and women living close to Adolfo Ruiz Cortines dam. 

Figure 3 Risk index of contamination by Lead source in: children, men and women living close to Adolfo Ruiz Cortines dam. 

A previous health risk assessment conducted in southern Sonora by Meza-Montenegro et al., (2012) demonstrated that there is a high probability for exposure to agricultural soil contaminated with As and Pb to produce adverse effects on health, this result supporting results of the present study, where a potential effect on health was found by consumption of tap water and O. niloticus contaminated with As and Pb; besides in both studies, children were shown to present the highest risk index. It has to be emphasized that other studies report similar findings: Monroy et al., (2002) informed that in blood samples of children from San Luis Potosí, Mexico, heavy metals are bioavailable; besides, similar risk assessments to the present study reported that there is a higher health risk of contamination by heavy metals in children than in adults (Giri & Singh, 2015; Liu et al., 2018).

Although Hlc in children is the highest among the assessed populations, this index might be underestimated, due to the fact that, according to recent studies from World Health Organization (2017), acute exposure to lead is more significant in children, since their brain and nervous system can take up 4 to 5 times more Pb than adults. In research studies, a higher health risk is reported in men than in women, due to occupational and consumption issues, men from those communities are specifically more exposed to heavy metal sources. However, women are physiologically more vulnerable than men since they naturally accumulate a higher quantity of body fat, increasing bioaccumulation (Karastergiou et al., 2012; Park & Lee, 2013).

Calculations of cumulative risk index are based on the sum of doses per heavy metal source (Table 3). Estimated Hlc for arsenic and lead were higher than 0.2 in all the assessed scenarios; therefore, in this research study a potential health risk for exposure to arsenic and lead was reported in Piedras Verdes and Conicárit communities was reported.

Table 3 Doses and cumulative risk index (HIc) in children, women and men from Piedras Verdes and Conicárit.  

Doses
(mg kg-1 day-1)
Children Women Men
Pb As Pb As Pb As
Sediment 4.9035E-05 4.4614E-05 3.0647E-06 2.7884E-06 5.2537E-06 4.7801E-06
water 0.00874930 0.00019081 0.00374970 8.1775E-05 0.00535671 0.00011682
O. niloticus 0.00264592 0.00186635 0.00066148 0.00046659 0.00170095 0.00119979
Dermic 0.00011411 0.00010382 6.0117E-06 5.4697E-06
Total 0.01155836 0.00220559 0.00441424 0.00055115 0.00706892 0.00132687
HIc* 3.302388 7.351969 1.261212 1.837166 2.019692 4.422883

*Ratio of total dose per heavy metal source to reference dose (RfD), where RfD (Pb)= 0.0035, RfD (As)= 0.0003.

Conclusions

There is a potential human health risk for exposure to As and Pb in communities living close to Adolfo Ruiz Cortines dam. Monitoring of water flow from the dam is recommended, mainly because it sustains 3+300 channel which provides potable water to Huatabampo municipality, Sonora. An evaluation of whether assessed health risks for As and Pb are originated by mining activities is required.

Acknowledgements

This research study was founded by Mayo River Irrigation District. We thank engineer José Manuel Delgado for his collaboration in sampling. As well, we thank the Environmental Toxicology laboratory for its support in sample analysis, especially to engineer Claudia Lucía Osorio Rosas.

References

Calla, L. H. & Cabrera, C. C. (2010). Calidad del agua en la cuenca del río Rímac, sector de San Mateo, afectado por las actividades mineras. Revista del Instituto de Investigaciones de la facultad de Geología, Minas, Metalurgia y cienciasa Geográficas, 13 (25): 87-94. http://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/iigeo/article/view/399Links ]

CIDA (Canadian International Development Agency). (2009). Risk Calculation Tools. Canada: The World Bank. [ Links ]

DOF (Diario Oficial de la Federación). (2018). NMX-AA-051-SCFI-2016. Análisis De Agua: Medición de Metales por Absorción Atómica en Aguas Naturales, Potables, Residuales y Residuales Tratadas- Método de Prueba. Diario Oficial de la Federación. (2016). [ Links ]

DOF (Diario Oficial de la Federación). (2018b). NOM-127-SSA1-1994, Salud ambiental. Agua para uso y consumo humano. Límites permisibles de calidad y tratamientos a que debe someterse el agua para su potabilización. Diario Oficial de la Federación. (2014). [ Links ]

Giri, S. & Singh, A. K. (2015). Human health risk assessment via drinking water pathway due to metal contamination in the groundwater of Subarnarekha River Basin, India. Environmental Monitoring Assessment, 187: 63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-015-4265-4 [ Links ]

Gómez-Álvarez, A., Valenzuela-García, J. L., Aguayo-Salinas, S., Meza-Figueroa, D., Ramírez-Hernández, J. and OchoaOrtega, G. (2007). Chemical partitioning of sediment contamination by heavy metals in the San Pedro River, Sonora, Mexico. Chemical Speciation & Bioavailability, 19 (1): 25-35. https://doi.org/10.3184/095422907X198013 [ Links ]

HC (Health Canada). (2012). Federal Contaminated Site Risk Assessment in Canada, Part I: Guidance on Human Health Preliminary Quantitative Risk Assessment (PQRA), Version 2.0. http://hc-sc.gc.ca/ewh-semt//pubs/contamsite/ part-partie_i/index-eng.phpLinks ]

Karastergiou, K., Smith, S. R., Greenberg, A. S. and Fried, S. K. (2012). Sex differences in human adipose tissues - the biology of pear shape. Biology of sex differences, 3: 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/2042-6410-3-13 [ Links ]

Liu, S., Tian, S., Li, K., Wang, L. and Liang, T. (2018). Heavy metal bioaccessibility and health risks in the contaminated soil of an abandoned, small-scale lead and zinc mine. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25: 15044-15056. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1660-8 [ Links ]

Meza-Montenegro, M. M., Gandolfi, A. J., Santana-Alcántar, M. E., Klimecki, W. T., Aguilar-Apodaca, M. G., Del Río-Salas, R., De la O-Villanueva, M., Gómez-Álvarez, A., Mendivil-Quijada, H., Valencia, M. and Meza-Figueroa, D. (2012). Metals in residential soils and cumulative risk assessment in Yaqui and Mayo agricultural valleys, northern Mexico. Science of The Total Environment, 433: 472-481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.06.083 [ Links ]

Modoi, O. C., Roba, C., Török Z. and Ozunu A. (2014). Environmental Risks Due to Heavy Metal Pollution of Water Resulted from Mining Wastes in Nw Romania. Environmental Engineering and Management Journal, 13 (9): 2325-2336. http://www.eemj.icpm.tuiasi.ro/pdfs/vol13/no9/full/26_348_Modoi_14.pdfLinks ]

Monroy, M., Diaz-Barriga, F., Razo, I. and Carrizales L. (2002). Evaluación de la contaminación por arsénico y metales pesados (Pb, Cu, Zn) y análisis de riesgo en salud en Villa de la Paz-Matehuala, S.L.P. Tesis maestría Instituto de Metalurgia U.A.S.S.L.P. http://ambiental.uaslp.mx/docs/fdbymmf-020701-notacontvpmat.pdfLinks ]

Park, S. & Lee, B. K. (2013). Body Fat Percentage and Hemoglobin Levels Are Related to Blood Lead, Cadmium, and Mercury Concentrations in a Korean Adult Population (KNHANES 2008-2010). Biological Trace Elements Research, 151: 315-323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-012-9566-7 [ Links ]

Ratul, A. K., Hassan, M., Uddin, M. K., Sultana, M. S., Akbor, M. A. and Ahsan, M. A. (2018). Potential health risk of heavy metals accumulation in vegetables irrigated with polluted river water. International Food Research Journal, 25(1): 329-338. http://www.ifrj.upm.edu.my/25%20(01)%202018/(44).pdfLinks ]

Tchounwou, P. B., Yedjou, C. G., Patlolla, A. K. and Sutton, D. J. (2012) Heavy Metal Toxicity and the Environment. In: Luch A. (eds) Molecular, Clinical and Environmental Toxicology. Experientia Supplementum, 101: 133-164. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7643-8340-4_6 [ Links ]

US EPA. (United States Environmental Protection Agency). (1989). Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund Volume I Human Health Evaluation Manual. Cincinnati (OH): USEPA. EPA/540/1-89/002. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-09/documents/rags_a.pdf [ Links ]

US EPA. (United States Environmental Protection Agency). (2009). Human-Health Assessment Scoping Document in Support of Registration Review: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Prevention, Pesticides, and Toxic Substances, Office of Pesticide Programs, U.S. Government Printing Office: Washington, DC. [ Links ]

US EPA. (United States Environmental Protection Agency). (2011). Exposure Factors Handbook: 2011 Edition. Washington DC:EPA/600/R-09/052F) [ Links ]

US EPA. (United States Environmental Protection Agency). (2017). Glyphosate; CASRN 1071-83-6. https://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/iris/ iris_documents/documents/subst/0057_summary.pdf [ Links ]

WHO (World Health Organization). (2013). Guidelines for drinking-water quality (4th ed.). http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/publications/2011/9789241548151_toc.pdf [ Links ]

WHO (World Health Organization). (2017). Fact sheet: Lead poisoning and health. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs379/en/ [ Links ]

Wongsasuluk, P., Chotpantarat, S., Siriwong, W. and Robson, M. (2013). Heavy metal contamination and human health risk assessment in drinking water from shallow groundwater wells in an agricultural area in Ubon Ratchathani province, Thailand. Environ Geochem Health, 36: 169-182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-013-9537-8 [ Links ]

Wuana, R. A. & Okieimen, F. E. (2011). Heavy Metals in Contaminated Soils: A Review of Sources, Chemistry, Risks and Best Available Strategies for Remediation. International Scholarly Research Network, 2011: 20. http://doi. org/10.5402/2011/402647 [ Links ]

Wyatt, C. J., Fimbres, C., Romo, L., Méndez, R. O. and Grijalva, M. (1998). Incidence of Heavy Metal Contamination in Water Supplies in Northern Mexico. Environmental Research, 76: 114-119. https://doi.org/10.1006/enrs.1997.3795 [ Links ]

Yi, Y., Yang, Z. and Zhang, S. (2011). Ecological risk assessment of heavy metals in sediment and human health risk assessment of heavy metals in fishes in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River basin. Environmental Pollution, 159: 2575-2585. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2011.06.011 [ Links ]

Cite this paper: Balderrama-Carmona A. P., Bisher-Álvarez Y., Silva-Beltrán N. P., Ayala-Parra P. A., Felipe-Ortega-Fonseca X. (2019).Health risk assessment of the consumption of Oreochromis niloticus, tap water, surface water and prey sediment contaminated with heavy metals in communities close to a copper mine and to Adolfo Ruiz Cortines dam, in Sonora, Mexico. Revista Bio Ciencias 6(2): e522. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15741/revbio.06.02.01

Received: June 06, 2018; Accepted: October 01, 2018

*Corresponding Author: Ana Paola Balderrama Carmona. Universidad de Sonora, Blvd. Lázaro Cárdenas 100, Colonia Francisco Villa C.P. 85880, Navojoa, Sonora. México. Phone: +52(642) 425 9969. E-mail: pabal@navojoa.uson.mx

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License