SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.10 issue55Agroforest technologies for a tropical dry forest: a methodological proposalAccumulated carbon estimation in Gmelina arborea Roxb. from Tlatlaya, Estado de México with allometric equations author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Revista mexicana de ciencias forestales

Print version ISSN 2007-1132

Rev. mex. de cienc. forestales vol.10 n.55 México Sep./Oct. 2019  Epub Feb 14, 2020

https://doi.org/10.29298/rmcf.v10i55.595 

Scientific article

Vanilla planifolia Jacks. ex Andrews distribution and actions for its conservation in the Huasteca Potosina

Karina L. Trinidad García1 

Humberto Reyes Hernández2  * 

Rosa I. Martínez Salazar2 

Erika Galarza Rincón3 

1Programa Multidisciplinario de Posgrado en Ciencias Ambientales, UASLP. México.

2Facultad de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, UASLP. México.

3Laboratorio de Sistemas de Información Geografía y Percepción Remota, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, UASLP. México.


Abstract

Vanilla (Vanilla planifolia), one of the most widely used orchids since pre-Columbian times, is currently under threat and subject to special protection. The objectives of this research were to identify the current and potential distribution of wild vanilla in the Huasteca Potosina; and design actions for its conservation. For this purpose, consultations were made in herbaria, field trips, interviews with the vanilla producers, and participatory workshops with local inhabitants. A spatial analysis was carried out in order to get to know the environmental characteristics of the plots with the presence of vanilla, and their potential distribution was modeled. In the Huasteca Potosina, 28 sites were located with the presence of the taxon under study, most of them in traditional agroforestry systems and, to a lesser extent, in the relics of medium forest that still persist in the region, anchored to the tutors that provide them with the necessary support. Its potential distribution was estimated at 85.5 km2 Germplasm without domestication processes and adapted to the environmental conditions that were identified, has the possibility of being conserved. The owners proposed wildlife management units for its conservation in situ.

Key words Conservation; potential distribution; conservation strategies; Maxent; Vanilla planifolia Jacks. ex Andrews; Huasteca Potosina

Resumen

La vainilla (Vanilla planifolia) es una de las orquídeas más ampliamente utilizada desde la época precolombina, actualmente, su estatus de conservación corresponde a la categoría de Sujeta a Protección Especial. Los objetivos de esta investigación fueron identificar su distribución actual y potencial en la Huasteca Potosina; y diseñar acciones para su conservación. Para ello, se realizaron consultas en herbarios, recorridos de campo, entrevistas con los productores de vainilla y talleres participativos con habitantes locales. Se llevó a cabo un análisis espacial basado en sistemas de información geográfica, para conocer las características ambientales de los sitios con presencia de la especie y se modelizó su distribución potencial. En la Huasteca Potosina, se ubicaron 28 sitios con presencia del taxón bajo estudio, la mayoría en sistemas agroforestales tradicionales y, menor proporción, en los relictos de selva mediana que aún persisten en la región, anclados a los tutores que les proveen el soporte necesario. Su distribución potencial se estimó en 85.5 km2. El germoplasma sin procesos de domesticación y adaptado a las condiciones ambientales que se identificaron, tiene posibilidades de ser conservado. Los poseedores de este recurso genético consideran que una Unidad de Manejo de la Vida Silvestre sería la forma más adecuada para lograr su conservación in situ.

Palabras clave: Conservación; distribución potencial; estrategias de conservación; Maxent; Vanilla planifolia Jacks. ex Andrews; Huasteca Potosina

Introduction

Vanilla (Vanilla spp.) is one of the most widely cultivated orchids in the world (Flanagan and Mosquera, 2016). Its demand encompasses the food, pharmaceutical, perfume and cosmetics industries (Azofeifa-Bolaños et al., 2014). The most important species of this genus across the world are Vanilla planifolia Jacks. ex Andrews, V. pompona Schiede and V. tahitensis J.W. Moore., as they produce natural vanillin (Flores et al., 2017).

Of the three species, Vanilla planifolia not only is the one most exploited for commercial purposes and the second natural flavoring in the food industry (Luna-Guevara et al., 2016) but also is subjected to special protection by the Mexican laws (NOM-059-SEMARNAT-2010) (Semarnat, 2010). This is mainly due to the deforestation and fragmentation of its habitat (medium evergreen forests), and to the illegal extraction of individuals for the establishment of commercial plantations (Soto and Dressler, 2010). The specificity of its pollinizers and natural disseminators is an element that increases the endangerment of its populations (Salazar et al., 2014).

The creation of germplasm banks, the improvement of conditions in the plantations and in vitro conservation are some of the most commonly utilized strategies for conserving this species (Bello-Bello et al., 2015). This requires knowing the status of its populations, defining actions that incorporate commercial, biological and cultural values, and designing specific conservation strategies (Herrera-Cabrera et al., 2012; Salazar et al., 2014; Hernández-Ruíz et al., 2016).

One of the most relevant tools for the protection and conservation of threatened species is the application of species distribution models (SDMs) (Baldwin, 2009; Cassini, 2011; Mateo et al., 2011). These models, based on the occurrence of the species, allow to determine the environmental factors that delimit their distribution or redistribution (Cassini, 2011). They facilitate not only the development of conservation strategies but also the repopulation of vegetal and animal species (Loiselle et al., 2003; Benito and Peñas, 2007; Obregón et al., 2014; Figueroa et al., 2016).

In Mexico, SDMs have been applied for the purpose of identifying distribution patterns and establishing priority areas for the conservation of birds (Jacinto-Flores et al., 2017), reptiles (Paredes et al., 2011) and plants (Villaseñor and Téllez-Valdés, 2004; Peters et al., 2014).

Given the economic and cultural importance of vanilla for Mexico and the rest of the world (Hernández, 2011), this paper seeks to contribute to the knowledge of the current distribution of Vanilla planifolia in the northeast of the country. So far, there is no recent evidence documenting its occurrence in the state of San Luis Potosí, nor is there basic information available for designing actions to preserve the current germplasm.

The objective of this research was to identify the current distribution sites of Vanilla planifolia, to model its potential distribution and to determine, together with local inhabitants, actions for its conservation in the Huasteca Potosina.

Materials and Methods

Study area

The Huasteca region, located in the state of San Luis Potosí, comprises two subregions: the northern Huasteca and the southern Huasteca (Inegi, 2017). The vanilla area of the state is situated in the latter, in the windward portion of the Eastern Sierra Madre (Reyes et al., 2018) (Figure 1). The predominant climate is semi-warm subhumid, with a small warm subhumid portion to the north and northeast, and a temperate humid segment exclusively in the municipality of Xilitla. Annual precipitations range from 1 500 to 3 000 millimeters, and the mean annual temperature ranges between 16 and 24 °C (Inegi, 2017).

Figure 1 Vanilla region, state of San Luis Potosí

Current and potential distribution

In order to define the current distribution of the species in the region, records a search was carried in the collections of the National Herbarium of Mexico (MEXU) and the Isidro Palacios Herbarium of the Instituto de Investigaciones de Zonas Desérticas (IIZD) (Desert Zones Research Institute), of the Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí (UASLP) (Autonomous University of San Luis Potosí). The database of the Red Mundial de Información sobre Biodiversidad (World Network of Information on Biodiversity) was also consulted (Remib, 2018). The result was two records of Vanilla planifolia for San Luis Potosí, corresponding to the same collection, deposited in the MEXU and the IIZD.

The database of the “2013-2015 Applied research macro project for the strengthening of vanilla production in Mexico” provided information on producers who reported the occurrence of vanilla in relicts of the medium jungle, of secondary vegetation and of the agroforest systems of the Huasteca known as te´lom and cuayo. Thus, 21 farmers were identified and received a questionnaire with semi-structured questions, with the purpose of verifying (among other data of interest about the species) whether the interviewee distinguished between different types of vanilla, knew the sites where the species grows wild and was certain that these populations had not been subjected to previous management (i.e. were uncultivated).

For the aims of this research, and in keeping with the General Wildlife Law, wild species were defined as: those organisms that subsist subject to natural evolutionary processes and develop freely in their habitat, including their smaller populations and individuals, whether under human control or feral (Semarnat, 2018).

Based on the information provided, field tours were undertaken between February and September, 2014, for the purpose of verifying the presence of the species. Thus, 28 sites were identified and georeferenced with a Garmin Colorado 600 GPS. Besides the coordinates of each site, information was obtained on the type of support tree that holds the plant, the height of the liana, the number of fruits, the percentage of shade, and the predominant environmental characteristics.

Likewise, botanical specimens were collected (Ricker, 2014) which were deposited in the IIZD Herbarium for later identification, through the use of taxonomic keys (Soto, 2003; Soto and Dressler, 2010).

The data georeferenced in the field (28) and the record obtained at the MEXU and IIZD herbariums were the basic inputs of the SDM, which was based on the maximum entropy algorithm known as Maxent. This model makes it possible to infer potential sites of occurrence of a particular species based on actual occurrence data and on the predominant environmental conditions (Cassini, 2011; Mateo et al., 2011). In addition to the occurrence data, the bioclimatic (BIO) layers of the database of the WorldClim-Global Climate Data (http://www.worldclim.org/), vegetation and Series V land use (VUS), altitude (MDT) and Series V edaphology (EDA) of the Inegi (https://www.inegi.org.mx/datos/) were incorporated into the SDM. All the information layers were converted to a raster format and standardized to a single cell size of 30 × 30 m (Table 1).

Table 1 Bioclimatic and physical variables used in the potential distribution model. 

Clave Variables
BIO1 Mean anual temperature
BIO2 Daytime temperature oscillation
BIO3 Isothermality
BIO4 Temperature seasonality
BIO5 Maximum mean temperature of the warmest period
BIO6 Minimum mean temperature of the coldest period
BIO7 Annual temperature oscillation
BIO8 Mean temperature of the rainiest quadrimester
BIO9 Mean temperature of the driest quadrimester
BIO10 Mean temperature of the warmest quadrimester
BIO11 Mean temperature of the coldest quadrimester
BIO12 Annual precipitation
BIO13 Precipitation of the rainiest period
BIO14 Precipitation of the driest period
BIO15 Precipitation seasonality
BIO16 Precipitation of the rainiest quadrimester
BIO17 Precipitation of the driest quadrimester
BIO18 Precipitation of the warmest quadrimester
BIO19 Precipitation of the coldest quadrimester
VUS20 Vegetation
MDT21 Land use
EDA22 Altitude

Repetitions were carried out alternating different qualitative and quantitative layers and calibrating the 25 %, 50 % and 75 % settings in order to determine the evaluation percentage (Benito and Peñas, 2007; Cassini, 2011). The main criterion for selecting the best model was a value of the ROC2 curve above 75 % (Muñoz and Felicísimo, 2004). Given that the training AUC (0.953) and evaluation AUC (0.939) coefficients are near 1, they indicate a high confidence interval, as they are above the random prediction, ensuring the robustness of the model.

The resulting SDM was exported to the ArcGis 10.2 software and superimposed on a SPOT satellite image of February, 2016, in order to check its coincidence with the areas occupied by rainforests (the natural habitat of the species). Finally, the surface area where V. planifolia may potentially be distributed was estimated.

Actions for conservation

In order to get into the territory and get involved with the local population in the conservation of the species, the locality of Jalpilla in Axtla de Terrazas was selected to design conservation actions through participative processes oriented toward action and personal commitment to the protection of the environment. The selection criterion was the support of the peasants for the project to be carried out.

Participatory methodologies are tools that help to decipher the reasons why a community that has some type of resource makes its decisions and, at the same time, allows to delineate some actions for its protection (Herlihy and Knapp, 2003). These methodologies are based on the active intervention of the local inhabitants and are composed of group dynamics, socio-dramas, critical routes, maps and other means that encourage the participation, analysis and reflection of the participants. Unlike other methods, this approach does not seek representativeness, since each case study is usually unique, in addition, due to its nature - qualitative type - they do not require a statistical analysis for validation (Reyes et al., 2013).

The methodology used in this work included conducting participatory evaluation workshops, field trips, application of semi-structured interviews and participant observation. Both the interviews and the participant observation are complementary instruments through which it was possible to triangulate and collate the information obtained in the workshops.

In Jalpilla, three participative workshops were carried out, with an average attendance of 8 to 10 producers, including the owners of the plots where Vanilla planifolia was found.

The first, a “recognition” workshop sought to identify the owners of the plots where the species was located and obtain general information on its uses, economic importance and production system. The second, a “conservation” workshop, had had the aim of recognizing the perception of the participants regarding the conservation and the actions implemented to preserve the species. The objective of the third workshop, on “actions for conservation”, was to identify and determine priority sites for the preservation of the species through several schemes and their discussion with the inhabitants.

In addition, the participants were trained in the assessment of the genetic resources, the importance of the local biodiversity, and the possibilities offered by the new conservation schemes.

As a result of the intervention, workshop participants proposed and defined by consensus, exclusion areas as the main measure to protect the species. For this, it was necessary to have the consent of the legal holders of said lands and their consent to implement the previously agreed actions. In order to establish the boundaries of the proposed areas more accurately, these were georeferenced in the field with a Garmin Colorado 600 GPS. Finally, all the information was represented in a SPOT satellite image of February, 2016, printed in true color and shown to the group for validation of the results.

Results

Current and potential distribution of Vanilla planifolia

The only record of Vanilla planifolia reported by the consulted herbaria for San Luis Potosí corresponds to the locality of Tanjasnec, San Antonio. It was carried out on May 4, 1979, by Janis Alcorn in a medium evergreen forest. In this research, the presence of the species was identified in 28 sites belonging to the 17 localities (Tanjasnec included) belonging to the municipalities of Aquismón, Axtla, Huehuetlan, Matlapa, San Antonio, Tancanhuitz, and Tamazunchale in the Huasteca Potosina (Figure 2).

Figure 2 Vanilla planifolia Jacks. ex Andrews plots in the Huasteca Potosina

The main characteristics of these places indicate that the species develops at altitudes of 100 to 767 m, in plots with slight (5 %) to moderate (>10 %) slopes. The minimum temperature ranges between 5 and 14 °C, and the maximum temperature, between 26 and 36°C. The annual precipitation ranges from 1 600 to 2 500 mm. The predominant vegetation type in all the sites is medium (evergreen and subdeciduous) forest (Figure 3).

Figure 3 Specimens of Vanilla planifolia Jacks. ex Andrews, located in forest relicts (1) and agroforest systems (2). 

The main support trees associated to vanilla were: wild coffee (Psychotria sp.), angelica tree (Dendropanax arboreus (L.) Decne. & Planch.), avocado (Persea Americana L.), bay cedar (Guacima ulmifolia Lam.) and black cherry (Prunus serotina Ehrh.). In average, a single liana was found per tree, with a length of five meters. Only two plants with visible fruits were found during the entire exploration. The botanical file of the collected specimens can be consulted on the virtual page of the Isidro Palacios Herbarium of IIZD. (http://slpm.uaslp.mx/DetalleEjemplar.aspx?id=8Uky0ajgzwU=).

The distribution model indicates that this species may inhabit a potential area of 85.5 km2 (Figure 4), the area with the highest probability of occurrence (71-87 %) being the central portion of the municipalities of Matlama and Tamazunchale, the central portion of Coxcatlán and San Antonio and Tancanhuitz, the west of Huehuetlán, and the southeast of Aquismón.

Figure 4 Potential distribution of Vanilla planifolia Jacks. ex Andrews in the Huasteca Potosina

It is important to emphasize that, although favorable environmental conditions for the development of Vanilla planifolia exist in the south of the Huasteca Potosina, the scarcity of areas with native arboreal vegetation ―due to the fragmentation of forests in the region― prevents the development of the species.

The variables that contribute in a smaller proportion to explain the potential distribution model of the species in the Huasteca Potosina are: i) annual precipitation (76.7 %), ii) type of vegetation (9.4 %), and iii) type of soil (6.3 %). The rest of the variables contributed less than 5 %.

Actions for the conservation of Vanilla planifolia

At Jalpilla, all the producers agreed that the species has inhabited the area in its wild form for more than 100 years. The plants were discovered by their grandparents, who collected them occasionally in order to sell the pods at the local markets. They also pointed out that the first vanilla producers promoted its development in the traditional agroforest systems “te´lom” (Teenek) and “cuayo” (Nahuatl), which harbored a large amount of wild specimens.

For vanilla producers, to conserve is to allow the preservation of the individuals without ceasing to use them. 80 % of the producers select certain individuals, take care of these and subsequently reproduce them in order to exploit them. However, they allow the original clone to persist in its wild condition, without managing or harming it.

The creation of exclusion areas where agricultural activities are forbidden in order to avoid the depredation of the V. planifolia populations is one of the main actions for protecting the species.

The four proposed areas measure a total of 12.8 ha and are located in plots that are barely accessible to the producers; although this is a limiting factor for agricultural exploitation, it has turned out to be a strength in terms of the conservation of the species at a local scale (Figure 5).

Figure 5 Proposed exclusion and protection areas of Vanilla planifolia Jacks. ex Andrews, in Jalpilla, Axtla, San Luis Potosí

Of all the presented and discussed options for the formal conservation of vanilla, the establishment of a Wildlife Conservation Management Unit (UMA, for its acronym in Spanish) has proven to be the most viable. Although the type of exploitation (intensive or extensive) was not determined, the critical route for carrying out this initiative in the medium term was established (Figure 6).

Figure 6 Critical path for the implementation of a proposed AMU as a local conservation strategy for the protection of Vanilla planifolia Jacks. ex Andrews, in Jalpilla, Axtla, San Luis Potosí

Discussion

The culture of Vanilla planifolia has become more important in the Huasteca Potosina due to its economic value in the market since the year 2003 (Sedarh, 2012; Reyes et al., 2018). However, so far there are few initiatives for conserving it. The main threats that this species faces are the plundering of its wild populations to establish new plantations and deforestation (Soto and Dressler, 2006; Flanagan and Mosquera, 2016).

The reduction or disappearance of its wild populations is greater particularly in those places where its culture was intensified, where severely fragmented habitats are predominant, or where other crops have been established (Azofeifa-Bolaños et al., 2014; Flores et al., 2017).

At the national level, the records of V. planifolia correspond to the states of Oaxaca, Chiapas and Quintana Roo (Schlüter et al., 2007; Conabio, 2010). One of the last collections in the field, carried out between 2008 and 2014 by Flores et al. (2017) locate most of the records in Quintana Roo. Although two collections are registered in San Luis Potosí (Vanilla planifolia and V. odorata), both are herbarium records. Although the authors do not indicate to which herbariums the collections correspond, it is very probable that the record of Vanilla planifolia is the same as Tanjasnec found in MEXU. The above is deduced from the geographical location of the site (Huasteca region) in the corresponding cartography. The opposite occurs with V. odorata, whose position in the mapping places it in the arid zone of the state, where the environmental conditions of the region make the presence of this species in the wild impossible.

It is important to highlight that in the research documented here, copies of V. planifolia were found in 28 sites after 33 years of the first record (Figure 2); although its presence is very scarce. In addition to the sites, there is a potential area of more than 85 km2 with environmental characteristics that are favorable to the species, according to the SDM obtained (Figure 4). These figures contrast with the number of records and with the huge surface area reported for Oaxaca (17 139 km2), with a good to moderate quality for harboring this species (Hernández-Ruíz et al., 2016). This could be explained due to the high degree of fragmentation and degradation of the forests of the Huasteca region (Reyes et al., 2006).

Hernández-Ruíz et al. (2016) point out that the precipitation of the rainiest quadrimester plays an essential role in the prediction of the model, in a similar way to the results obtained in this research. In this regard, the link existing between the amount of precipitation in the rainy season and the presence of a clearcut dry period (mid-summer heat wave or mid-summer drought) is decisive for the productivity of vanilla (Exley, 2011).

Although the main interest of the inhabitants in vanilla is economic, an economic-cultural relationship dating back to at least two centuries ago may be inferred (Alcorn, 1983; Moreno-Calles et al., 2013). According to the results obtained, most of the populations without human management, destined for conservation and recollection, are in the te´lom/cuayo. These “agroforests” safeguard an ancestral knowledge of the management of the natural resources (Moreno-Calles et al., 2013) and at the same time harbor the largest number of wild specimens, compared to the rest of the production systems.

In this regard, there is a broad consensus in that both in situ and ex situ strategies must be applied in order to achieve conservation and sustainable use of the wild relatives of a species. The world strategy for the conservation of vegetal species states that, in addition to conserving these species, the associated indigenous and local knowledge must be respected, preserved and maintained (FAO, 2017).

In this sense, the conservation model known as “circa situm” or “peasant-based conservation”, allows the provision of the habitat and the flow of genes in altered agricultural landscapes, but within the native sphere of the species (Boshier et al., 2004; Dawson et al., 2013). This model, proposed in countries like Colombia (Flanagan and Mosquera; Flanagan et al., 2018) could be an alternative to protect Vanilla planifolia and contribute to strengthen rural livelihood, as in the case of the conservation program for the vanilla germplasm in the region of Totonacapan, Veracruz (Herrera-Cabrera et al., 2012; Salazar et al., 2014).

In Mexico, the strategies for the conservation of wild vanilla are not enough(March et al., 2009). Certain in situ and ex situ conservation initiatives led by higher education institutions stand out. The National System of Phytogenetic Resources (Sinarefi, for its acronym in Spanish) proposed conservation schemes that included the building of capacities and the use and potentiation of vanilla. However, they have all had little participation by the local inhabitants.

Peasant-based in situ conservation combined with exploitation schemes such as the UMAs may be applied to strengthen the livelihoods, culture and local production systems (Salazar et al., 2014). Considering that V. planifolia would be present in a large portion of the southern Huasteca Potosina, where the production of vanilla is concentrated (Reyes et al., 2018), this scheme could be the most adequate.

In addition to promoting social participation for wildlife conservation, an UMA would improve the economic standard of living of the local inhabitants through an orderly exploitation of the resources. At the same time, it seeks to empower the local inhabitants through the collective management of biodiversity (Conafor, 2009).

The new worldwide conservation schemes, such as the voluntary guidelines for conservation and the sustainable use of wild relatives of cultivated species, may provide an opportunity for the local farmers who have safeguarded the V. planifolia populations for centuries (FAO, 2017).

Conclusions

This paper documents, for the first time after forty years, the presence of Vanilla planifolia in San Luis Potosí, in 28 sites belonging to 17 localities of eight municipalities of the Huasteca Potosina. Besides the 28 georeferenced sites, a potential area of more than 85 km2 with favorable environmental characteristics for the development of the species was identified and quantified. The relationship between the economy, the culture and the conservation of this species in the region dates back to at least two centuries ago. Although the inhabitants carry out an empirical management of the vanilla populations, this must be supplemented with scientific knowledge allowing a better conservation of the species. Furthermore, promotion of regulated exploitation schemes allowing to strengthen the local livelihoods and, at the same time, to diversify of the traditional production systems is required.

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to express their gratitude to the local producers and guides of the various municipalities of the Huasteca Potosina, to the project “Estrategia de Investigación aplicada para el fortalecimiento, innovación y competitividad de la producción de vainilla en México” (“Applied research strategy for the strengthening, innovation, and competitiveness of vanilla production in Mexico”). SAGARPA-CONACYT: 2012-04-190442. Subproject SP01 Vanilla in the Huasteca Potosina. To the Fondo de Apoyo a la Investigación de la UASLP (C19-FAI-05-77.77) for the complementary resources. The first author thanks Conacyt for the grant awarded for her doctoral studies.

REFERENCES

Alcorn, J. B. 1983. El Te'lom huasteco: Presente, pasado y futuro de un sistema de silvicultura indígena. Biótica 8:315-331. [ Links ]

Azofeifa-Bolaños, J. B., A. Paniagua-Vásquez y J. A. García-García. 2014. Importancia y desafios de la conservación de Vanilla spp (Orquidaceae) en Costa Rica. Agronomía Mesoamericana 25(1):189-202. [ Links ]

Baldwin, R. 2009. Use of maximum entropy modeling in wildlife research. Entropy 11:854-866. Doi: 10.3390/e11040854. [ Links ]

Bello-Bello, J. J., G. G. García-García y L. Iglesias-Andreu. 2015. Conservación de vainilla (Vanilla planifolia Jacks.) bajo condiciones de lento crecimiento in vitro. Revista Fitotecnia Mexica 38(2):165-171. [ Links ]

Benito, B. y J. Peñas. 2007. Aplicación de modelos de distribución de especies a la conservación de la biodiversidad en el sureste de la Península Ibérica. GeoFocus. Revista Internacional de Ciencia y Tecnología de la Información Geográfica 7:100-119. [ Links ]

Boshier, D., J. E. Gordon and A. J. Barrance. 2004. Chapter 16. Prospects for Circa Situm Tree Conservation in Mesoamerican Dry-Forest Agro-ecosystems. In: Frankie, G. W., A. Mata and S. Bradleigh V. (eds.). Biodiversity conservation in Costa Rica, Learning the lessons in a seasonal dry forest. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, USA. pp. 210-226. [ Links ]

Cassini, M. H. 2011. Ecological principles of species distribution models: the habitat-matching rule. Journal of Biogeography 38(11):2057-2065. Doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2011.02552.x. [ Links ]

Comisión Nacional Para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad (Conabio). 2010. Vanilla planifolia (vainilla). Distribución conocida. http://www.conabio.gob.mx/informacion/metadata/gis/vanpla_dcgw.xml?_httpcache=yes&_xsl=/db/metadata/xsl/fgdc_html.xsl&_indent=no (9 de enero de 2016). [ Links ]

Comisión Nacional Forestal (Conafor). 2009. Manejo de Vida Silvestre. Manual Técnico para Beneficiarios. Coordinación General de Educación y Desarrollo Tecnológico. Gerencia de Educación y Capacitación. Primera edición. Guadalajara, Jal., México.34 p. [ Links ]

Dawson, I. K., M. R. Guariguata, J. Loo, J. C. Weber, A. Lengkeek, D. Bush, J. Cornelius, L. Guarino, R. Kindt, C. Orwa, J. Russell and R. Jamnadass. 2013. What is the relevance of smallholders' agroforestry systems for conserving tropical tree species and genetic diversity in circa situm, in situ and ex situ settings? A review. Biodiversity and Conservation 22(2):301-324. Doi :10.1007/s10531-012-0429-5. [ Links ]

Secretaría del Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales (Semarnat). 2018. Ley General de Vida Silvestre. Ultima reforma. Cámara de Diputados. Diario Oficial de la Federación. 19 de enero 2018. México, D.F. 68 p. [ Links ]

Exley, R. 2011. Vanilla production in Australia. In: Havkin-Frenkel, D. and F. Belanger (ed.). Handbook of Vanilla Science and Technology. Wiley-Blackwell, West Sussex, UK. pp. 69-78. [ Links ]

Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Alimentación y la Agricultura (FAO). 2017. Directrices voluntarias para la conservación y el uso sostenible de parientes silvestres de cultivos y plantas silvestres comestibles. Roma, Italia. 110 p. [ Links ]

Figueroa, J., M. Stucchi y R. Rojas, R. 2016. Modelación de la distribución del oso andino Tremarctos ornatus en el bosque seco del Marañón (Perú). Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad. 87:230-238. Doi: 10.1016/j.rmb.2016.01.008. [ Links ]

Flanagan, N. and A. Mosquera. 2016. An integrated strategy for the conservation and sustainable use of native vanilla species in Colombia. Lankesteriana 16(2):201-218. Doi: 10.15517/lank.v16i2.26007. [ Links ]

Flanagan, N. , N. Ospina, L. García, M. Mendoza and H. Mateus. 2018. A new species of Vanilla (Orchidaceae) from the North West Amazon in Colombia. Phytotaxa 364(3):250-258. Doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.364.3.4. [ Links ]

Flores J., A., D. Reyes L., D. Jiménez G., O. Romero A., J. A. Rivera T., M. Huerta L. y A. Pérez Silva. 2017. Diversidad y perfiles bioclimáticos de Vanilla spp. (Orchidaceae) en México. Revista de Biología Tropical 65(3):975-987. Doi: 10.15517/rbt.v65i3.29438. [ Links ]

Herlihy P. and G. Knapp 2003. Maps of, by, and for the Peoples of Latin America. Human Organization. Journal of the society for applied anthropology 62(4):303-314. Doi: 10.17730/humo.62.4.8763apjq8u053p03. [ Links ]

Hernández H., J. 2011. Mexican vanilla production. In: Havkin-Frenkel, D. and F. C. Belanger (ed.). Handbook of Vanilla Science and Technology. Wiley-Blackwell , West Sussex, UK. pp. 3-25. [ Links ]

Hernández-Ruíz. J., B. E. Herrera-Cabrera, A. Delgado-Alvarado, V. M. Salazar-Rojas, Á. Bustamante-Gonzalez, J. E. Campos-Contreras y J. J. Ramírez-Juarez. 2016. Distribución potencial y características geográficas de poblaciones silvestres de Vanilla planifolia (Orchidaceae) en Oaxaca, México. Revista de Biología Tropical 64(1):235-246. Doi: 10.13140/RG.2.1.2744.3601. [ Links ]

Herrera-Cabrera, B. E., V. M. Salazar-Rojas, A. Delgado-Alvarado, J. Campos-Contreras and J. Cervantes-Vargas. 2012. Use and conservation of Vanilla planifolia J. in the Totonacapan region, México. European Journal of Environmental Sciences 2(1):43-50. Doi: 10.14712/23361964.2015.37. [ Links ]

Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (Inegi). 2017. Anuario estadístico y geográfico del estado de San Luis Potosí. Aguascalientes, Ags., México. 623 p. [ Links ]

Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (Inegi). 2018. Metadatos geográficos. https://www.inegi.org.mx/datos/?t=0150000000000000 (3 de mayo de 2018). [ Links ]

Jacinto-Flores, N. E., L. A. Sánchez-González and R. C. Almazán-Núñez. 2017. Patrones de distribución y zonas prioritarias para la conservación de la avifauna de la costa del Pacífico de Guerrero, México. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 88(4):960-977. Doi: 10.1016/j.rmb.2017.10.038. [ Links ]

Luna-Guevara, J. J., H. Ruíz-Espinosa, E. B. Herrera-Cabrera, A. Navarro-Ocaña, A., A. Delgado-Alvarado y M. L. Luna-Guevara. 2016. Variedad de microflora presente en vainilla (Vanilla planifolia Jacks. ex. Andrews) relacionados con procesos de beneficiado. Agroproductividad 9(1)3-9. Doi: 10.1016/j.rmb.2017.10.038. [ Links ]

Loiselle, B. A., C. A Howell, C. H. Graham, J. M. Goerck, T. Brooks, K. G. Smith and P. H. Williams. 2003. Avoiding pitfalls of using species distribution models in conservation planning. Conservation Biology 17:1591-1600. Doi: 10.1111/j.1523-739.2003.00233.x. [ Links ]

March, I. J., M. A. Carvajal, R. M. Vidal, J. E. San R. y G. Ruiz. 2009. Planificación y desarrollo de estrategias para la conservación de la biodiversidad. In: Dirzo, R, R. González e I. J. March. (comps.). Capital natural de México, vol. II: Estado de conservación y tendencias de cambio. Conabio. México, D.F., México. pp. 545-573. [ Links ]

Mateo, R. G., A. M. Felicísimo y J. Muñoz. 2011. Modelos de distribución de especies: una revisión sintética. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 84:217-240. Doi: 10.4067/S0716-078X2011000200008. [ Links ]

Moreno-Calles, A. I., V. M. Toledo y A. Casas. 2013. Los sistemas agroforestales tradicionales de México: Una aproximación biocultural. Botanical Sciences 91(4):375-398. Doi: 10.17129/botsci.419. [ Links ]

Muñoz, J. and M. A. Felicísimo. 2004. A comparison between some statistical methods commonly used in predictive modeling. Journal of Vegetation Science 15:285-292.Doi:10.1111/j.1654-1103.2004.tb02263.x. [ Links ]

Obregón, R., S. Arenas, F. Gil, D. Jordano y J. Fernández. 2014. Biología, ecología y modelo de distribución de las especies del género Pseudophilotes Beuret, 1958 en Andalucía (Sur de España) (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). SHILAP Revista de Lepidopterología 42(168):501-516. [ Links ]

Paredes, D., A. Ramírez y M. Martínez. 2011. Distribución y representatividad de las especies del género Crotalus en las áreas naturales protegidas de México. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 82(2):689-700. Doi: 10.22201/ib.20078706e.2011.2.464. [ Links ]

Peters, E., S. Arizaga, C. Martorell, R. Zaragoza y E. Ezcurra. 2014. Distribución geográfica y estado de conservación de las poblaciones de Mammillaria pectinifera. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 85(3):942-952. Doi: 10.7550/rmb.36338. [ Links ]

Red Mundial de Información sobre Biodiversidad (Remib). 2018. Red Mundial de Información sobre Biodiversidad. Conabio. http://www.conabio.gob.mx/remib/doctos/remib_esp.html (26 de abril de 2018). [ Links ]

Reyes H., H., K. L. Trinidad G. y B. E. Herrera C. 2018. Caracterización del ambiente de los vainillales y área potencial para su cultivo en la Huasteca Potosina. Biotecnia 20 (3):49-57. Doi: 10.18633/biotecnia.v20i3.714. [ Links ]

Reyes H., H. , N. Montoya T., J. Fortanelli M. M. Aguilar-Robledo y J. García. 2013. Metodologías participativas aplicadas al análisis de la deforestación del bosque de niebla en San Luis Potosí, México. Bios et forets des tropiques 318(4):27-39. Doi:10.19182/bft2013.318.a20515. [ Links ]

Reyes H., H. , M. Aguilar R., J. R. Aguirre R. e I. Trejo V. 2006. Cambios en la cubierta vegetal y uso del suelo en el área del proyecto Pujal-Coy, San Luis Potosí, México. Investigaciones Geográficas 59:26-42. Doi:10.14350/rig.30019. [ Links ]

Ricker, M. 2014. Manual para realizar las colectas botánicas del Inventario Nacional Forestal y de Suelos. Comisión Nacional Forestal. Secretaria de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales. Instituto de Biología, UNAM. México, D.F., México. 42 p. [ Links ]

Salazar-Rojas, V. M., B. E. Herrera-Cabrera, A. Delgado y J. Campos. 2014. Planeación estratégica para la conservación del recurso genético vainilla (Vanilla planifolia Andrews. Orchidaceae) en su centro de domesticación, región Totonacapan, México. In: Araya F., C., R. Cordero S., A. Paniagua V y J. B. Azofeifa B. (eds). Seminario Internacional de Vainilla. Promoviendo la investigación, la extensión y la producción de vainilla en Mesoamérica. Primera edición. INISEFOR. Heredia, Costa Rica. 194 p. [ Links ]

Schlüter, P. M., M. A. Soto A. and S. A. Harris. 2007. Genetic Variation in Vanilla planifolia (Orchidaceae). Economic Botany 61(4): 328-336. Doi: 10.1663/0013-0001(2007)61[328:GVIVPO]2.0.CO;2. [ Links ]

Secretaria de Desarrollo Agropecuario y Recursos Hidraúlicos (Sedarh). 2012. Plan Rector para la Competitividad del Sistema Producto Vainilla del estado de San Luis Potosí. Comité Estatal del Sistema Producto Vainilla del Estado de San Luis Potosí. San Luis Potosí, SLP., México. 95 p. [ Links ]

Secretaria de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales (Sermarnat). 2010. NORMA Oficial Mexicana NOM-059-SEMARNAT-2010, Protección ambiental-Especies nativas de México de flora y fauna silvestres.http://dof.gob.mx/nota_detalle_popup.php?codigo=5173091 (4 de febrero de 2018). [ Links ]

Soto A., M. 2003. Vanilla. In: Pridgeon, A.M., P.J. Cribb, M.W. Chase y F.N. Rasmussen (eds.) Genera Orchidacearum. Oxford University Press. Oxford UK. pp. 321-334. [ Links ]

Soto A., M. and R. L. Dressler. 2010. A revision of the Mexican and Central American species of Vanilla plumier ex Miller with a characterization of their its region of the nuclear ribosomal DNA. Lankesteriana 9(3):285-354. Doi: 10.15517/LANK.V0I0.12065. [ Links ]

Villaseñor, J. L. y O. Téllez-Valdés. 2004. Distribución potencial de las especies del género Jefea (Asteraceae) en México. Anales del Instituto de Biología, Serie Botánica 75(2):205-220. [ Links ]

Received: June 15, 2019; Accepted: August 15, 2019

Conflict of interests

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Contribution by author

Karina L. Trinidad García: herbarium consultation, field work, development of the SDM, drafting of the document; Humberto Reyes Hernández: design of the study, support in the field work, data analysis, editing of the document; Rosa I. Martínez Salazar: support in the field tours, conduction of workshops; Erika Galarza Rincón: design of maps.

Creative Commons License Este es un artículo publicado en acceso abierto bajo una licencia Creative Commons