SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.13 número4La hipocalcemia en la vaca lechera. RevisiónEvaluación bacteriana de queso artesanal Zacazonapan madurado bajo condiciones no controladas en dos épocas de producción índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Revista mexicana de ciencias pecuarias

versão On-line ISSN 2448-6698versão impressa ISSN 2007-1124

Rev. mex. de cienc. pecuarias vol.13 no.4 Mérida Out./Dez. 2022  Epub 11-Nov-2022

https://doi.org/10.22319/rmcp.v13i4.5217 

Thecnical notes

Productive performance and nutritional value of Pennisetum purpureum cv. Cuba CT-115 grass at different regrowth ages

Gloria Esperanza de Dios-Leóna 

Jesús Alberto Ramos-Juáreza  * 

Francisco Izquierdo-Reyesa 

Bertín Maurilio Joaquín-Torresa 

Francisco Meléndez-Navab 

a Colegio de Postgraduados, Campus Tabasco. Periférico Carlos A. Molina. Km 3.5 carretera Cárdenas-Huimanguillo, 86500, H. Cárdenas, Tabasco, México.

b Universidad Popular de la Chontalpa. Departamento de Zootecnia. Cárdenas, Tabasco.


Abstract

Grass species forage yield and nutritional value directly affect livestock production performance. They also vary in response to regional climate and soil conditions. Forage yield and nutritional value in Pennisetum purpureum cv. Cuba CT-115 were evaluated at five regrowth ages (30, 45, 60, 75 and 90 d) in three seasons (dry, rainy and northwinds). A completely randomized block design with repeated measures was used, with four replicates per treatment. In all three seasons, maximum height was reached at 75 d: 127.1 cm in the dry season, 151.6 cm in the rainy season and 137.0 cm the northwind season. Forage yield was highest (27.0 t DM ha-1) at 90 d in the rainy season, with a growth rate of 300.2 kg DM ha-1 d-1, 7.3% crude protein and 37.0% in situ digestibility of dry matter. The leaf:stem ratio was highest at 30 d in all seasons, with a 1.65 average value. Crude protein content was highest in the northwind season at 30 and 45 d, with a 15.6 % average value. In all three seasons, digestibility was highest at 30 (mean= 49.3 %), 45 (51.8 %) and 60 d (48.2 %). Based on forage yield, use of P. purpureum cv. Cuba CT-115 grass for open grazing is recommended for cutting at 90 days’ regrowth and based on its nutritional quality is recommended for grazing at 60 days’ regrowth, both during the rainy season.

Key words Pennisetum purpureum; Forage yield; Growth rate; Quality

Resumen

Se evaluó el rendimiento de forraje y valor nutritivo del pasto Pennisetum purpureum cv Cuba CT-115, en cinco edades de rebrote: 30, 45, 60, 75 y 90 días, en tres épocas del año: seca, lluvias y nortes. Se utilizó un diseño de bloques completos al azar con medidas repetidas, con cuatro repeticiones por tratamiento. La mayor altura se registró a partir de los 75 días, en todas las épocas, con valores de 127.1, 151.6 y 137.0 cm, en seca, lluvias y nortes, respectivamente. El rendimiento más alto de forraje (27.0 t MS ha-1) se obtuvo a los 90 días en la época de lluvias, con una tasa de crecimiento (TC) de 300.2 kg MS ha-1 día-1, 7.3 % de proteína cruda (PC) y 37.0 % de degradación in situ de la materia seca (DIMS). La relación hoja:tallo fue mayor a los 30 días de rebrote, con un valor promedio de 1.65. El contenido de PC fue mayor en la época de nortes a 30 y 45 días, con un valor promedio de 15.6 %. La DIMS fue más alta a 30, 45 y 60 días, con valores promedio de 49.3, 51.8 y 48.2 %, respectivamente. Con base al rendimiento de forraje, se recomienda el uso del pasto Cuba CT-115 para corte a 90 días de rebrote durante la época de lluvias, mientras que, por su calidad nutricional, se recomienda su uso para pastoreo a 60 días de crecimiento después del corte.

Palabras clave Pennisetum purpureum; Rendimiento de forraje; Tasa de crecimiento; Calidad

In the humid tropics of Mexico, forages are the main feed source for cattle. Forage availability and its nutritional value varies between seasons. Production is highest during the rainy season and declines during the northwind and dry seasons1. Meat and milk production in grazing cattle respond directly to forage production, with decreased yields as forage production drops. Consequently, there is an ongoing search for forage species that meet animal nutritional requirements while maintaining constant, year-round production2. The grass Pennisetum purpureum cv. Cuba CT-115 is part of this search. Created from a clone of King grass generated through tissue culture, this cultivar was originally introduced in Cuba in the 1990s. Its short internodes and low height make apt for direct grazing. In addition, beginning at four to six months of age it has high biomass production (15 t MS-1 ha) and higher nutritional value than the Cameroon, Dwarf and Taiwan cultivars of King grass2,3.

Understanding a forage species’ growth and production performance, and consequent forage availability, in a specific region is vital to designing management strategies that maximize animal production4. Seasonal variations in growth rate, leaf biomass, leaf area index and plant height are used as criteria for guiding optimal and sustainable pasture management5,6. Cutting frequency also influences forage yield7. Seasonal and annual forage growth and yield are a direct function of weather conditions, soil fertility and management practices8. To obtain maximum forage yield each forage species requires specific seasonal management9. It is therefore important to understand a forage species’ productive behavior and optimal harvest time since these parameters directly affect forage yield and pasture persistence10.

No data has yet been published on the productive behavior of P. purpureum cv. Cuba CT-115 under the climatic and soil conditions of the state of Tabasco, Mexico. The present study objective was to evaluate the forage yield and nutritional value of P. purpureum cv. Cuba CT-115 at different regrowth ages during the dry, rainy and northwind seasons in Cambisol soil in the Chontalpa region of Tabasco.

The experiment was carried out under seasonal conditions from April 2011 to April 2012, at the Experimental Field of the Colegio de Postgraduados, in the state of Tabasco, Mexico, (17°59'15.6" N, 93°35'06.9" W; 12 m asl). Regional climate is Am, warm humid, with summer rains, 2,251 mm average annual rainfall and 26 °C average annual temperature11. Rainfall during the experimental period was 2,576 mm, with 6. 9% falling in the dry season, 70.3 % in the rainy season and 22.8 % in the northwind season. The highest rainfall (723 mm) during the experimental period was recorded in October. Average temperature during the experimental period was 24.4 °C, with seasonal averages of 25.6 °C in the dry season, 25.7 °C in the rainy season and 21.8 °C in the northwind season. Maximum temperature during the experimental period was 35.3 °C in April and the minimum was 16.0 °C in December (Figure 1). Soil in the experimental field is Cambisol, with a clay loam texture, pH 5.5, 1.9 % organic matter (OM), 0.14 % nitrogen (N) and 21.4 mg kg-1 phosphorous (P).

Figure 1 Average monthly temperature and rainfall during experimental period at Experimental Field at Cárdenas, Tabasco 

The P. purpureum cv. Cuba CT-115 pasture used in the present study was planted in 2009, in furrows spaced at 0.80 m and 1 m between plants. Since then, it has been grazed with cattle. A uniform manual cut was done on April 1, 2011, at an approximate height of 10 cm above ground surface. After this initial cut the field was fertilized with 100 kg nitrogen (urea) in three 33.3 kg applications: one in April, July and October. Weed control was done manually at the beginning of the experimental period.

Experimental design was a completely random block design involving five regrowth ages (30, 45, 60, 75 and 90 d) and three seasons (dry, March-May; rainy, June-October; and northwind, November-February). Four replicates were done of each treatment (e.g., regrowth age), using season as a repeated measurement12. Samples were collected after reaching each successive regrowth age. Each of the twenty experimental plots consisted of four rows (4 m long, 0.80 m apart). The plots measured 4 x 3.2 m, with a total area of 12.8 m2, and an effective area of 4.8 m2 consisting of the central furrows.

Measurements were taken of plant height and these used to calculate forage yield, and growth rate (GR). The leaf:stem ratio was quantified using plant samples. Analyses were done of dry matter (DM), crude protein (CP), in vitro digestibility of dry matter (IDDM), neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid detergent fiber (ADF). Plant height, from soil surface to the top of the flag leaf13, was measured immediately prior to cutting. Forage yield was estimated by harvesting plants inside the 4.8 m2 effective area from ground level. A representative 3 kg subsample was taken from the harvested forage, washed and dried at 65 °C for 72 h in a forced air oven. Calculation of dry matter yield (DM) was done using the formula: DM = FM x % DM/100, where FM= fresh matter13. The leaf:stem ratio was calculated using a 2 kg subsample of the harvested forage. Its leaf and stem components were separated, weighed and dried at the temperature and time indicated above. Growth rate (GR) was calculated with the formula: GR= HF/t, where GR= growth rate (kg DM ha-1d-1), HF= harvested forage (kg DM ha-1) and t= days elapsed between forage harvests14. Both DM and CP content were measured following the applicable AOAC techniques15. Established protocols were used to quantify IDDM at 24 h16, and NDF and ADF17. All analyses were run at the Animal Science Laboratory of the Colegio de Posgraduados, Tabasco.

Results were evaluated with an analysis of variance (ANOVA) to identify statistical differences between the studied factors: treatments, seasons and the treatments x season interaction. A Tukey test (α=0.05) was applied for a multiple comparison of means for treatments, seasons and the treatments x season interaction. Significant differences were analyzed following the general guide A factor (treatments) effects in each B factor (season) level18. All analyses were run with the Proc Mixed procedure and Slice instruction in the SAS ver. 9.4 software19.

The ANOVA identified differences (P<0.05) in the treatments x seasons interaction in all the evaluated variables. Plant height increased as regrowth age increased, the highest value (165.1 cm) being recorded at 90 d in the rainy season; this is 10.8 % higher than in the northwind season and 15.4 % higher than in the dry season. Forage yield also increased as regrowth age increased, the highest yield (27.0 t DM ha-1) also being observed at 90 d in the rainy season. In all three seasons, leaf:stem ratio values decreased as regrowth age increased, the highest value (1.79) being recorded at 30 d in the rainy season. Growth rate (GR) was highest (300.2 kg DM ha-1d-1) at 90 d in the rainy season. Average GR in the rainy season was 237.3 kg DM ha-1d-1, which is 105 % higher than in the northwind season and 148 % higher than in the dry season (Table 1).

Table 1 Plant height, forage yield, leaf:stem ratio and growth rate in Pennisetum purpureum cv. Cuba CT-115 at different regrowth ages in three seasons 

Seasons Regrowth age (days)
30 45 60 75 90
Plant height (cm)
Dry 59.4c 91.5b 96.0b 127.1a 147.2a
Rainy 64.4c 103.8b 123.3b 151.6a 165.1a
Northwind 45.0c 64.7c 98.5b 137.0a 138.9a
Forage yield (t DM ha-1)
Dry 4.0b 4.2b 3.9b 5.0b 10.7a
Rainy 5.9c 6.6c 16.3b 20.3b 27.0a
Northwind 3.1c 2.9b 7.8ab 11.8a 11.3a
Leaf:stem ratio
Dry 1.73a 1.69a 0.79b 0.82b 0.76b
Rainy 1.79a 1.15b 0.88bc 0.72c 0.56c
Northwind 1.43a 1.26ab 0.85bc 0.94bc 0.75c
Growth rate (kg DM ha-1 d-1)
Dry 134.8a 92.9a 65.4a 66.8a 119.3a
Rainy 196.4bc 147.7c 272.0ab 270.9ab 300.2a
Northwind 103.4ab 65.3b 129.2ab 156.9a 125.5ab

abc Different letter superscripts in the same row indicate statistical difference (Tukey, P<0.05).

In all three seasons, DM increased as regrowth age increased. The highest average values were recorded at 90 d: 23.7 % in the dry season, 19.4 % in the rainy season and 15.4 % in the northwind season. At all five regrowth ages, DM values were higher in the dry season, with a 19.7 % average. This average is 16.2 % higher than in the rainy season and 35 % higher than in the northwind season. Crude protein (CP) values decreased as regrowth age increased. The highest values were all recorded at 30 d: 15.7 % in the northwinds season, 12.5 % in the dry season and 10.4 % in the rainy season. At all five regrowth ages, average CP values were highest (13.1 %) in the northwind season. This value is 50.6 % higher than in the rainy season and 57.8 % higher than in the dry season. In all three seasons, IDDM remained unchanged up to 60 d regrowth and decreased after 75 d regrowth. The lowest NDF values were observed at 45 d in the dry and rainy seasons. No differences were found at any of the regrowth ages in the northwind season. In contrast, ADF content increased as regrowth age increased, the highest value (47.1 %) being observed at 90 d in the rainy season, which had 43.2 % average ADF.

An increase in plant height at greater regrowth ages is normal behavior in upright growth grasses20. The highest height was recorded in the rainy season and can be attributed to the higher rainfall (1,812 mm) and temperature (25.7 °C) values recorded in that season. In P. purpureum, both higher rainfall and temperature favor photosynthesis, and consequently growth. As expected, the lower precipitation (586 mm) and temperature (21.8 °C) of the dry season, in addition to its shorter days, high winds and greater cloud cover, negatively affected plant photosynthesis capacity, slowing growth. Lower heights have been reported previously for P. purpureum cv. Cuba CT-115. For example, during the dry season heights of 31 cm at 75 d regrowth and 53 cm at 90 d have been reported21. In a study evaluating P. purpureum clones, height was 68 cm at 60 d regrowth during the rainy season and 64 cm at 90 d in the dry season22. In an evaluation of 12 P. purpureum species, heights during the rainy season were 56.4 cm at 60 d regrowth and 66.3 cm at 90 d. In the present study, regardless of season, average plant height at 60 d regrowth was 105.9 cm. Since maximum height for direct grazing of this grass cultivar is 100 cm23, 60 d regrowth is apparently the optimal time of use for this grass under the present study conditions.

Forage yield was highest (27.0 t DM ha-1) in the rainy season at 90 days’ regrowth; this yield was 139 % higher than in the northwind season and 151 % higher than in the dry season. There is a positive correlation between plant age and yield, and rainfall and yield, as observed elsewhere24. The forage yields observed in the present study are notably higher than previously reported for the studied cultivar. For example, one study found a 3.8 t DM ha-1 yield during the rainy seasons and a 1.2 t DM ha-1 yield during the dry season22. In eight P. purpureum clones, yields of 2.5 t DM ha-1 were observed in the rainy season and 0.47 t DM ha-1 in the dry season25. Such broad discrepancies in results may result from variations in climate conditions, crop management practices and soil fertility. Forage yield distribution in the present study was 5.6 t DM ha-1 in the dry season, 7.4 t DM ha-1 in the northwinds season and 15.2 t DM ha-1 in the rainy season. The lower yield observed during the dry season can be attributed to the substantially lower rainfall (178 mm) during this season, which negatively affects the biochemical process of plant photosynthesis24. In the northwind season, the lower yield is more probably due to its lower temperatures rather than the relatively lower precipitation.

In all three seasons the leaf:stem ratio was highest at 30 d regrowth, which can be attributed to the higher number of leaves present at early ages in this grass species. This parameter decreased from 1.65 at 30 d to 0.69 at 90 d, analogous to the decrease from 1.33 at 33 d to 0.77 at 90 d reported elsewhere for P. purpureum26.

The high GR observed in the present study during the rainy season can be attributed to the higher rainfall and temperatures (1,812 mm and 25.7 °C, respectively) occurring during this season. These favor plant metabolic activity, increasing the amount of photosynthates and, consequently, DM production. In contrast, the lack of rainfall in the dry season clearly limits plant growth. In all three seasons GR increased at 60, 75 and 90 d regrowth, indicating an increase in DM yield with age. The same response has been reported previously in P. purpureum cv. Cuba CT-11527,28, as well as in P. purpureum cv. King29.

The above growth response also accounts for the greater fiber accumulation with age observed in the present results, which is normal in tropical grasses26. It occurs because the proportion of cell wall in a plant, directly associated with DM content, increases with age as the leaf:stem ratio tips in favor of stems, more vascular bundles appear, cell content decreases and water is lost28,29. In the present results, DM content was highest (23.7 %) in the dry season, perhaps due to water stress caused by greater leaf maturation and senescence, and consequent DM accumulation. Compared to stems, leaves have a higher senescence rate because their surface is more sensitive, causing them to lose more water29.

The lower CP content with greater regrowth age observed in the present results can be attributed to the lower leaf:stem ratio with plant age. The higher leaf:stem ratio at younger ages results in higher CP content since protein occurs in greater quantities in leaves. In addition, synthesis of structural components such as cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin increases as plants mature, lowering forage quality in grasses. The highest CP content in the present results were lower than reported elsewhere for this cultivar during the rainy season (14.5 % at 28 d, 12.0 % at 56 d and 11.0 % 84 d regrowth)28. However, CP contents at all the regrowth times and in all three seasons in the present study were above the 7 % minimum CP level required for proper rumen functioning30.

The lower IDDM values with greater regrowth age observed in the present study were due to the higher leaf:stem ratio at 30, 40 and 60 days’ regrowth than at 75 and 90 days’ regrowth (Table 2). Older forage plants have higher DM percentages and more NDF and ADF content because, as they mature, the proportion of stems increases and that of leaves decreases (i.e., the leaf:stem ratio drops), increasing the amount of structural carbohydrates and lignin, which directly influence forage digestibility and use efficiency31. The average IDDM in the present results (46.2 %) is considered low, although it is only slightly lower than the 50.1 % reported for this cultivar at 56 days’ regrowth and 24 h incubation32. The average rainy season NDF (75.5 %) and ADF (43.2 %) values in the present results are similar to the 72.2 % NDF and 44.1 % ADF reported for another Pennisetum species33. In the present study, both NDF and ADF contents were highest in the rainy season at 60, 75 and 90 days’ regrowth. This is probably due to the higher rainfall and temperature values in this season, which would generate more growth, more stem production and, consequently, more DM, cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin accumulation17. The present results coincide with the literature, which indicates that tropical grasses grow and mature quickly, causing changes in their chemical composition and decreased forage nutritional quality.

Table 2 Nutritional value of Pennisetum purpureum cv Cuba CT-115, at different age of regrowth in three seasons 

Seasons Regrowth age (days)
30 45 60 75 90
Dry matter (%)
Dry 17.4b 18.4b 19.3b 19.6b 23.7a
Rainy 14.4b 14.7b 16.2ab 17.9ab 19.4a
Northwind 10.6b 11.2ab 12.2ab 14.4ab 15.4a
Crude protein (%)
Dry 12.5a 7.8b 7.1b 7.0b 7.4b
Rainy 10.4a 10.9a 7.9b 7.0b 7.3b
Northwind 15.7a 15.5a 13.0b 11.2bc 10.3c
In situ degradation of dry matter (%)
Dry 48.1ab 54.3a 49.4ab 46.7b 42.9b
Rainy 51.3a 49.8a 45.1ab 40.2b 37.0c
Northwind 48.6a 51.3a 50.1a 39.0b 39.3b
Neutral detergent fiber (%)
Dry 60.7c 62.9bc 67.4ab 70.5a 64.4bc
Rainy 70.1b 70.0b 77.0a 79.7a 80.6a
Northwind 65.4a 68.0a 67.1a 70.8a 68.2a
Acid detergent fiber (%)
Dry 31.6c 33.6bc 39.3ab 34.3bc 43.6a
Rainy 38.8b 40.3b 44.9ab 45.0ab 47.1a
Northwind 33.8b 34.9ab 35.9ab 36.9ab 40.8a

abc Different letter superscripts in the same row indicate statistical difference (Tukey, P<0.05).

Forage yield of the grass Pennisetum purpureum cv. Cuba CT-115 studied here increased with regrowth age, providing a yield distribution of 53.9 % in the rainy season, 26.2 % in the northwind season and 19.9 % in the dry season. Total annual production under the experimental conditions was 28.2 t DM ha-1. Forage nutritional value in terms of CP, IDDM, and NDF and ADF content decreased with regrowth age. From a forage yield and quality perspective, Pennisetum purpureum cv. Cuba CT-115 grass is best at 60 days’ regrowth for direct grazing and 90 days’ for cutting.

Literatura citada

1. Sosa REE, Cabrera TE, Pérez RD, Ortega RL. Producción estacional de materia seca de gramíneas y leguminosas forrajeras con cortes en el Estado de Quintana Roo. Téc Pecu Méx 2008;46(4):413-426. [ Links ]

2. Araya MM, Boschini C. Producción de forraje y calidad nutricional de variedades de Pennisetum purpureum en la Meseta Central de Costa Rica. Agron Mesoamericana 2005;16(1):37-43. [ Links ]

3. Cruz R, Torres V, Herrera RS, Martínez RO. Cultivo de tejido y fitotecnia de las mutaciones de pastos tropicales. Pennisetum purpureum: otro ejemplo para la obtención de nuevos clones. Rev Cubana Cienc Agríc 1996;30(1):1-10. [ Links ]

4. Hernández GA, Hodgson JG, Matthew C. Effect of spring grazing management on perennial ryegrass and ryegrass-white clover pastures. 1. Tissue turnover and herbage accumulation. N Z J Agric Res 1997;40(1):37-50. [ Links ]

5. Da Silva SC, Hernández GA. Manejo del pastoreo en praderas tropicales. En: Velasco ZME et al, editores. Los Forrajes y su impacto en el trópico. 1ra. ed. Universidad Autónoma de Chiapas. Chiapas, México; 2010:63-95. [ Links ]

6. Velasco ZME, Hernández GA, González HVA, Pérez PJ, Vaquera HH. Curvas estacionales de crecimiento del ballico perenne. Rev Fitotec Mex 2002;25(1):97-106. [ Links ]

7. Herrera RS, Martínez RO, Cruz R, Tuero R, García M, Guisado I et al. Producción de biomasa con hierba elefante (Pennisetum purpureum) y caña de azúcar (Saccharum officinarum) para la ganadería tropical. II. Carbohidratos solubles y estructurales. Rev Cubana Cienc Agric 1995;29(2):245-252. [ Links ]

8. McKenzie BA, Kemp PD, Moot DJ, Matthew C, Lucas RJ. Enviromental effects on plant growth and development. In: White J, Hodgson J editors. New Zealand pasture crop science. Oxford: University Press; 1999:29-44. [ Links ]

9. Zaragoza EJA, Hernández GA, Pérez PJ, Herrera HJG, Osnaya GF, Martínez HP et al. Análisis de crecimiento estacional de una pradera asociada alfalfa-pasto ovillo. Téc Pecu Méx 2009;47(2):173-188. [ Links ]

10. Santana PAA, Pérez LA, Figueredo AME. Efectos del estado de madurez en el valor nutritivo y momento óptimo de corte del forraje napier (Pennisetum purpureum Schum.) en época lluviosa. Rev Mex Cienc Pecu 2010;1(3):277-286. [ Links ]

11. García E. Modificaciones al sistema de clasificación climática de Köppen. Quinta edición. Serie Libros No. 6. Anexo. Instituto de Geografía, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México; 2004. [ Links ]

12. Gumpertz ML, Brownie C. Repeated measures in randomized blocks and split experiments. Institute of Statistics Mimeograph. Series No. 2202. NCSU, NC, USA; 1991. [ Links ]

13. Toledo JM, Schulze-Kraft R. Metodología para la evaluación agronómica de pastos tropicales. En: Toledo JM editor. Manual para la evaluación. Red Internacional de Evaluación de Pastos Tropicales (RIEPT). Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT), Cali Colombia; 1982:91-110. [ Links ]

14. Garduño VS, Hernández GA, Herrera HJG, Martínez HPA, Joaquín TBM. Rendimiento y dinámica de crecimiento estacional de Ballico perenne, pastoreado con ovinos a diferentes frecuencias e intensidades. Téc Pecu Méx 2009;47(2):189-202. [ Links ]

15. AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis. 20th Edition. Maryland, USA: Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 2016. [ Links ]

16. Orskov ER, Howell DeBFD, Mould F. The use of the nylon bag technique for the evaluation of feedstuffs. Trop Anim Prod 1980;5(3):195-213. [ Links ]

17. Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci 1991;74(10):3583-3597. [ Links ]

18. Maxwell SE, Delaney HD. Designing experiments and analysing data: A model comparison perspective. Brooks/Cole Publishing Company, Pacific Grove, CA.USA;1990. [ Links ]

19. SAS. SAS User’s Guide: Statistics (version 9.4). Cary NC, USA: SAS Institute Inc. 2013. [ Links ]

20. Crespo G, Álvarez J. Comparison of biomass production of Penissetum purpureum clones N fertilized. Cuban J Agric Sci 2014;48(3):287-291. [ Links ]

21. Casanovas E, Figueredo Y, Soto R, Novoa R, Valera R. Efecto de la frecuencia de corte en el comportamiento fenológico y productivo de Pennisetum purpureum vc. Cuba CT-115 en el periodo poco lluvioso. Rev Cubana Cienc Agríc 2006;40(4):465-470. [ Links ]

22. Herrera RS, García M, Cruz AM, Romero A. Assessmet of Pennisetum purpureum clones obtained by in vitro tissue culture. Cuban J Agric Sci 2014;46(4):427-433. [ Links ]

23. Tarazona AM, Ceballos MC, Naranjo JF, Cuartas CA. Factores que afectan el comportamiento de consumo y selectividad de forrajes en rumiantes. Rev Colomb Cienc Pecu 2012;25(3):473-487. [ Links ]

24. Sanderson MA, Stair DW, Hussey MA. Physiological and morphological responses of perennial forages to stress. Adv Agron 1997;59:171-224. [ Links ]

25. Herrera RS. Clones of Pennisetum purpureum for different ecosystems and productive purposes. Cuban J Agric Sci 2015;49(4):515-519. [ Links ]

26. Luna MR, Chacón ME, Ramírez RJ, Álvarez PG, Álvarez PP, Plúa PK et al. Rendimiento y calidad de dos especies del género Pennisetum en Ecuador. Rev Electrón Vet 2015;16(8):1-10. [ Links ]

27. Fortes D, Herrera RS, García M, Cruz AM, Romero A. Growth analysis of the Pennisetum purpureum cv. Cuba CT-115 in the biomas bank technology. Cuban J Agric Sci 2014;48(2):167-172. [ Links ]

28. Valenciaga D, Chongo B, Herrera RS, Torres V, Oramas A, Cairo JG et al. Efecto de la edad de rebrote en la composición química de Pennisetum purpureum cv. Cuba CT-115. Rev Cubana Cienc Agríc 2009;43(1):73-79. [ Links ]

29. Chacón HPA, Vargas RCF. Digestibilidad y calidad del Pennisetum Purpureum cv. King grass a tres edades de rebrote. Agron Mesoamericana 2009;20(2):399-408. [ Links ]

30. Van Soest PJ. Nutritional ecology of the ruminant. Second ed. Ithaca NY, USA: Cornell University Press; 1994. [ Links ]

31. Vieira RMA, Fernández AM. Importancia de los estudios cuantitativos asociados a la fibra para la nutrición y alimentación de los rumiantes. 43 Reunión de la Sociedad Brasilera de Zootecnia. Joao Pessoa, Brasil: Sociedad Brasileira de Zootecnia; 2006. [ Links ]

32. Valenciaga D, Chongo B, Lao O. Caracterización del clon Pennisetum CUBA CT-115. Composición química y degradabilidad ruminal de la materia seca. Rev Cubana Cienc Agríc 2001;35(4):349-354. [ Links ]

33. Valles MB, Castillo GE, Bernal BH. Rendimiento y degradabilidad ruminal de materia seca y energía de diez pastos tropicales cosechados a cuatro edades. Rev Mex Cienc Pecu 2016;7(2):141-158. [ Links ]

Received: January 14, 2019; Accepted: August 30, 2021

Creative Commons License Este es un artículo publicado en acceso abierto bajo una licencia Creative Commons