SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.13 número2Desempeño productivo de ovinos alimentados con ensilaje de pasto buffel en sustitución de ensilaje de maízUltrasonografía y descripción fisiológica de eventos esenciales para el manejo reproductivo en ganado lechero. Revisión índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Revista mexicana de ciencias pecuarias

versão On-line ISSN 2448-6698versão impressa ISSN 2007-1124

Rev. mex. de cienc. pecuarias vol.13 no.2 Mérida Abr./Jun. 2022  Epub 20-Jun-2022

https://doi.org/10.22319/rmcp.v13i2.6032 

Review

Ovarian function and response to estrus synchronization in Creole cattle in Mexico. Review

Elizabeth Pérez-Ruiza 

Andrés Quezada-Casasolab 

José María Carrera-Chávezb 

Alan Álvarez-Holguína 

Jesús Manuel Ochoa-Riveroa 

Manuel Gustavo Chávez-Ruiza 

Sergio Iván Román-Poncea  * 

a INIFAP. Centro de Investigación Regional Norte-Centro. CE La Campana. Km 33.5 Carr. Chihuahua - Ojinaga. 32910. Aldama, Chihuahua. México.

b Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez. Departamento de Ciencias Veterinarias. Ciudad Juárez, Chihuahua, México.


Abstract

Nowadays, reproductive biotechnologies have made it possible to conserve and use animal genetic resources. One of these technologies is the estrus synchronization programs, which allow programming the time for mating according to the availability of fodder or the birth of calves for commercial purposes. Another application is the reduction of the calving- first ovulation interval through protocols that facilitate the use of artificial insemination. Creole cattle are a valuable genetic resource due to their hardiness and adaptability to difficult environmental conditions; they are resistant to parasites, take advantage of available forage resources and reproduce in systems with little or no supplementation. In Mexico, the first studies of synchronization of Creole cattle suggest that Creole cows do not respond adequately to hormonal protocols and gestation percentages lower than those obtained in other breeds are obtained. The foregoing gave rise to a series of studies on reproductive physiology and the use of biotechnologies in Creole cattle. The objective of this review is to collect existing information on the use of estrus and ovulation synchronization protocols in Creole cattle from Mexico; in order to be able to identify the lines of research necessary for the development of estrus and ovulation synchronization protocols suitable for Creole cattle.

Key words Beef cattle; Animal genetic resources; Artificial insemination; Ovulation

Resumen

Hoy en día, las biotecnologías reproductivas han hecho posible conservar y aprovechar los recursos zoogenéticos. Una de estas tecnologías son los programas de sincronización de estros, mismos que permiten programar la época para el empadre acorde a la disponibilidad de forraje o el nacimiento de los becerros por fines comerciales. Otra aplicación es la reducción del intervalo parto primera ovulación, mediante protocolos que facilitan el uso de inseminación artificial. Los bovinos criollos son un recurso genético valioso, debido a su rusticidad y adaptabilidad a condiciones ambientales difíciles; son resistentes a parásitos, aprovechan los recursos forrajeros disponibles y se reproducen en sistemas con poca o nula suplementación. En México, los primeros estudios de sincronización de bovinos criollos sugieren que las vacas criollas no responden adecuadamente a los protocolos hormonales y se obtienen porcentajes de gestación inferiores a los obtenidos en otras razas. Lo anterior, dio origen a una serie de investigaciones en fisiología reproductiva y uso de biotecnologías en ganado criollo. El objetivo de esta revisión es recabar la información existente sobre el uso de protocolos de sincronización de estros y ovulación en bovinos criollos de México; con la finalidad de poder identificar las líneas de investigación necesarias para el desarrollo de protocolos de sincronización de estros y ovulación adecuados para el ganado criollo.

Palabras clave Bovinos carne; Recursos zoogenéticos; Inseminación artificial; Ovulación

Introduction

Creole cattle are the descendants of Iberian cattle transported to the Americas during the colonization of these countries by the Spanish and Portuguese1. One of the most important traits of Creole cattle is their adaptability to difficult environmental conditions; they reproduce in systems with extreme fluctuations in ambient temperature2,3, are resistant to parasites4 and take advantage of a variety of herbaceous plants, in addition to alternating between grazing and browsing1. The adaptability of a breed to variable environments, called phenotypic plasticity, is a quality of Creole cattle, which can be used in current selection and reproduction systems1. Therefore, these cattle are a genetic resource that could contribute to improving productivity in a challenging environment1,5. Regarding animal genetic resources, in March 2018, 7,745 breeds of the 8,803 breeds registered by FAO were classified as local breeds (i.e., reported to be present in only one country) and a total of 594 local breeds became extinct. Among existing local breeds, 26 % were classified as at risk of extinction, 7 % are not at risk and 67 % as unknown6. One of the possible causes of the decrease in the population of local breeds is because they are considered unproductive, compared to specialized breeds (European and Zebu). In general, Creole cattle are small animals and can hardly compete with other breeds of cattle specialized in the production of meat or milk, so many farmers have chosen to make crosses with these, or replace Creoles with other cattle breeds7,8.

Reproductive biotechnologies are useful tools to open the possibility of conserving and exploiting animal genetic resources9. With the application of estrus synchronization programs, it is possible to choose the best time for mating (according to the availability of fodder), reduce the interval from calving to first ovulation (CFO), facilitate the use of artificial insemination (AI) and implement genetic improvement programs10. The manipulation of the estrous cycle and the induction of ovulation through the different synchronization protocols in conjunction with AI have numerous additional advantages, such as the production of calves in homogeneous batches and the possibility of increasing the sale price, as well as facilitating the nutritional and health management of the herd11. However, the use of reproductive biotechnologies, such as estrus and ovulation synchronization, is little used in Creole cattle, and with variable results12,13. In Mexico, the first studies related to the synchronization of Creole cattle were carried out in the 1990s, and it was mentioned in them that Creole cows do not respond adequately to hormonal protocols12. Therefore, the objective of this review is to collect the existing information on the use of estrus synchronization protocols in Creole cattle from Mexico and in this way, to be able to identify the lines of research necessary for the development of estrus and ovulation synchronization protocols suitable for Creole cattle, which will allow directing research and development efforts.

Fixed-time artificial insemination in cattle

With the use of exogenous hormones and their analogues, it is sought to control follicular development, regression of the corpus luteum (CL) and ovulation, to later perform AI at detected estrus or fixed-time AI (FTAI). With the hormonal protocols for FTAI, the following is achieved: 1) reduce the number and frequency of cattle handling, and 2) eliminate the need for estrus detection to perform AI, which is why they are the most used in beef cattle14.

Estrus synchronization treatments are mainly based on the use of two types of hormones, progestogens (mainly progesterone, P4) and prostaglandin F (PGF) analogues. In ovulation synchronization protocols, estradiol (E2) analogues and gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH)15 are additionally used. Preference in the use of these treatments for FTAI may be limited in countries where there are restrictions on the use of E216, such as the United States of America, Australia, the United Kingdom, among others. The percentage of gestation that can be obtained with these FTAI protocols varies in a range of 40-60 %15. The establishment of gestation depends to a large extent on the correct function of the CL, the adequate signaling of the embryo for the maternal recognition of gestation and the oviductal and uterine environment that favors the development of the embryo. These factors are modified in part by the preovulatory conditions, that is, there is an effect of the steroidogenic capacity of the follicle, and the consequent competence of the oocyte17. Other critical factors for the success of synchronization protocols are the physiological state of the animals (prepubertal heifers, cyclic or anestric cows), body condition (BC)18, nutrition, semen quality, inseminator dexterity11 and time of insemination after hormone treatment19.

For example, females with low BC (usually ≤ 4 on scale from 1 to 9)11 tend to be in anestrus and, therefore, have low gestation percentages compared to females with better BC18. Additionally, first-calving heifers are more sensitive to weight loss and low BC, compared to multiparous cows18. Nutrient intake and energy balance, before and after calving, affect the duration of the postpartum anestrus and the interval from calving to conception, as well as the percentage of pregnancy11. When AI is performed, the efficiency of the inseminator is influenced by the quality and handling of the semen, as well as by their technical ability to deposit the semen in the right place11. In addition, the correct handling and evaluation of semen straws is essential to ensure the quality of the material used, as it directly influences the fertilization rate and, therefore, the pregnancy rate. Prior to AI, it is recommended to evaluate the semen that will be used, according to the most important semen characteristics11. Therefore, it is imperative that inseminator technicians are sufficiently trained to guide the AI gun through the cervix, to deposit the semen completely at the entrance of the uterine body11.

Conventional protocols for FTAI based on estradiol and progesterone in cattle

The protocol based on the use of P4 and E2 is known as conventional. P4 simulates the function of CL, inhibiting the release of GnRH/LH pulses. E2, applied at the beginning of the treatment with P4, causes ovulation of the possible existing dominant follicle and atresia of the rest of the subordinate follicles. With the emergence of a new follicular wave, between three and five days later, the presence of a new dominant follicle and a viable oocyte at the end of the treatment with P4 are sought20. The administration of E2 at the end of the treatment with P4 induces, in the same way as the first application, a positive feedback on the hypothalamus for the release of GnRH and the consequent increase in the frequency of LH pulses, which synchronizes and reduces the time in which the ovulation occurs, to perform the FTAI20.

The conventional protocol consists of the insertion of a CIDR and the administration of EB (at a total dose of 2 mg, via IM) on the day of the beginning of treatment with P4 (day 0)16. Estradiol 17 β (E-17β) has a shorter half-life than EB, so the latter has been shown to be more efficient in FTAI protocols20. Additionally, PGF is administered at the time of removal of the CIDR, to ensure the regression of the CL that has formed after ovulation after the first application of E2 (d 7, 8 or 9, in case of existence of a CL)21. To synchronize ovulation, a total dose of 1 mg of EB can be applied 24 h after the end of the treatment with P4, and the FTAI can be performed 30 to 34 h after applying the second dose of EB22. A modification to this protocol consists of administering a total dose of 0.5 or 1 mg of EC at the time of removing the device with P4, which simplifies the handling of cattle, with FTAI 48 to 56 h later15,23. EC has a longer half-life than EB, so its use allows reducing the number of manipulations carried out on cattle23. Another option is to apply a dose of 100 μg of GnRH 54 h after removal of the CIDR (at the time of performing the FTAI), which induces ovulation of the new dominant follicle, in case it has not ovulated spontaneously14. One more alternative to this protocol is the administration of equine chorionic gonadotropin (eCG) at the time of finishing the treatment with P424 (Figure 1). The eCG binds to the FSH and LH receptors, causing the increase in the growth rate of the dominant follicle, stimulates the expression of steroidogenic enzymes, mainly follicular E2, with the consequent occurrence of the preovulatory peak of LH. Additionally, eCG produces an increase in the diameter of the CL and increases the production of P4 after AI25. This effect of eCG is more marked in females with low BC (and that gain weight during the time of mating) and in postpartum (PP) anestrus 24.

In CE (estradiol cypionate), GnRH (gonadotropin-releasing hormone) and eCG (equine chorionic gonadotropin) treatments, the second dose of BE (estradiol benzoate) is replaced with the respective hormone, at the time of removal of the CIDR (intravaginal progesterone releasing device), to simplify the handling of cattle.

Figure 1 Schematic representation of synchronization protocols based on progesterone and estradiol 

Doses of 300-400 IU of eCG are used in beef cattle, these doses are the most used both in conventional protocols21 and in GnRH-based protocols26,27. The eCG can promote the growth of one or more follicles in the same wave, so not only a larger follicular diameter is achieved, but also the increase in the ovulation rate in cows treated with this hormone, when high doses (400-600 IU)28 are used. The occurrence of multiple births in beef cattle is considered undesirable, so the increase in the ovulation rate due to the effect of eCG is controversial27. These eCG effects are most evident during PP anestrus, in cows that are lactating and with low BC24, because the secretion of GnRH/LH is decreased during this stage28. However, in cows with good BC, a beneficial effect is not observed26.

Protocols for FTAI based on GnRH and PGF

The initial application of a GnRH analogue causes the release of LH in the form of a preovulatory peak and, therefore, the ovulation of a possible dominant follicle present, with the subsequent appearance of a new follicular wave approximately two days later29. The administration of PGF 7 d after the application of GnRH induces the regression of the possible CL formed after the application of GnRH and a second dose of GnRH will again cause the release of the preovulatory peak of LH, producing the ovulation of a new dominant follicle in a synchronized way30.

The most commonly used protocol for FTAI in dairy cattle is known as Ovsynch (ovulation synchronization)29. This protocol requires the handling of cattle three times to apply hormones and a fourth time to perform the FTAI (Figure 2), so it is impractical for its use in beef cattle31,32. The alternative for this type of cattle is the CO-Synch protocol33 (the second dose of GnRH is applied at the time of the FTAI), in which the number of times in which cattle are handled is reduced32. However, with this protocol, 5 to 20 % of females in PP anestrus have estrus before or immediately after the application of PGF, so a lower pregnancy rate is obtained than with the Ovsynch protocol34. The insertion of a CIDR, between the first administration of GnRH and the application of PGF (Figure 2), increases the pregnancy rate with this protocol34,35. The use of the CIDR prevents ovulation before and after the application of PGF, caused by spontaneous luteolysis of the CL, and as a result, estruses more synchronized with the moment of the FTAI are obtained, therefore, higher pregnancy rates are obtained with the CO-Synch + CIDR protocol34,35. The success of this protocol depends largely on the percentage of females that ovulate after the first dose of GnRH14. If the induction of the ovulation of the dominant follicle is achieved, the emergence of the next follicular wave and ovulation will be synchronized22.

Figure 2 Schematic representation of the Ovsynch, Co-Synch and CO-Synch+CIDR protocols for FTAI (GnRH: gonadotropin-releasing hormone; PGF: prostaglandin F; IATF: fixed-time artificial insemination) 

In dairy cattle, one more alternative to increase the percentage of pregnant cows in the Ovsynch protocols is the pre-synchronization with one or two doses of PGF36, with a difference of 14 d between each dose, and the application of the first dose of GnRH 12 to 14 d after the second dose of PGF, this protocol is known as Pre-Synch (Figure 3). The objective of this pre-synchronization is that the cows are between d 5 and 12 of the cycle at the time of starting treatment with GnRH36,37. In beef cattle, pre-synchronization is impractical, since this protocol involves handling the cattle a greater number of times and does not increase the percentage of pregnant females after FTAI37. As a result of the stress produced when introducing beef cows into pens and handling sleeves, animals experience a fight-or-flight response, which activates the adrenal axis and the release of stress hormones (catecholamines and glucocorticoids), which have a negative effect on the reproductive axis38.

Figure 3 Schematic representation of the Pre-Synch protocols used in dairy cattle and Pre CO-Synch developed for beef cattle (GnRH: gonadotropin-releasing hormone; PGF: prostaglandin F; IATF: fixed-time artificial insemination) 

5-day Co-Synch protocol

The 5-day Co-Synch protocol with FTAI 72 h later (Figure 4) is based on the idea that increasing the period in which the dominant follicle develops in the presence of gonadotropins can increase the percentage of pregnant females after the hormone treatment39. The main changes in this protocol are: 1) the reduction of the treatment with P4 from 7 to 5 d, to avoid adverse effects of persistent follicles on the fertility of cows that do not ovulate with the first dose of the GnRH analogue (total dose of 100 μg of gonadorelin, IM), and 2) prolong the period from removal of P4 to administration of GnRH, to increase exposure to circulating E2 concentrations before ovulation17. With this protocol, a greater diameter of the dominant follicle, an increase in the concentration of E2, as well as a greater production of P4 after ovulation, necessary for gestation40, are observed.

In these protocols, proestrus is prolonged (increase of the period between the end of treatment with Progesterone (P4) and IATF (PGF= prostaglandin F; GnRH= gonadotropin-releasing hormone; BE= estradiol benzoate; IATF: fixed-time artificial insemination)

Figure 4 5-day CO-Synch and J-Synch protocols 

J-Synch protocol

This protocol is based on the use of P4 and EB, with a longer duration of proestrus than with conventional treatment41. The protocol begins with the administration of a total dose of 2 mg of EB at the time of insertion of a device with P4, which is removed 6 d later. At the time of removal of the device with P4, a single dose of PGF is applied. Additionally, 100 μg of GnRH is applied at the time of FTAI, 72 h after (d 9, Figure 4). Similar to the 5-day CO-Synch protocol, with the prolongation of the proestrus (95-97 h), an increase in the concentrations of E2 (before ovulation) and P4 (after ovulation) is observed, as well as a higher percentage of gestation (when females are in good BC), compared to the conventional Co-Synch protocol42. Recent studies indicate that the length of the proestrus is decisive for the establishment of gestation. With a longer proestrus, E2 production increases before ovulation. Among the functions of E2 are the modification of cell morphology, secretion and regulation of steroid receptors, which favor the implantation of the conceptus in the uterus43.

Table 1 shows some results obtained for the percentage of pregnancy, with different synchronization protocols.

Table 1 Percentage of gestation obtained with different protocols for FTAI in cattle 

Type of protocol† Breed type‡ Pregnancy (%) Reference
Based on P4 and E2
Conventional (EB) BI, BT 30.0-40.6 25,44-46
Conventional (EC) BI, BT 34.7-54.0 16,42,44,47,48
J-Synch BI/BT, BT 47.0-67.9 16,41,42,47,49
Conventional EB + eCG BI 36.8-57.5 25,46,50,51
Conventional EC + eCG BI, BT 50.3-61.8 16,28,43,48,52
J-Synch + eCG BI/BT, BT 53.0-60.4 16,43,47,53
Based on GnRH and PGF
Ovsynch BT 32.5-57.0 33,36,54,55
Pre-Synch BT 27.0-49.6 36,37,55-57
CO-Synch BT 26.7-53.3 33-35,54,58
CO-Synch + CIDR BT 50.0-55.1 26,34,35,58-60
5-d CO-Synch BT 44.4-59.7 61-63
5-d CO-Synch + CIDR BT 48.0-63.9 59,60 63-66
CO-Synch + CIDR + eCG BT 43.0 26
5-d CO-Synch + CIDR + eCG BT 42.9 67

†CIDR= intravaginal progesterone releasing device; P4=progesterone; E2= estradiol; PGF= prostaglandin F2α; GnRH= gonadotropin-releasing hormone; EB= estradiol benzoate; eCG= equine chorionic gonadotropin; EC= estradiol cypionate.

‡ BT: Bos taurus taurus; BI: Bos taurus indicus.

Creole cattle in Mexico

Creole cattle in Mexico descend from the first specimens brought by the Spanish during the Colonial Period in the sixteenth century68. These cattle developed qualities of adaptation to the environment in isolated and hard-to-reach areas, which contributed to the formation of breed groups69,70. In Mexico, of the 53 breeds of cattle recorded in the database of the biodiversity of domestic animals published by FAO71, the following stand out as local breeds: the Chinampo, from Baja California72,73; the Coreño, from the Sierra Madre Occidental74,75; the Creole from the Northern Mountains, also called rodeo Creole or Rarámuri Creole70; the Mixteco76; the Creole from the Gulf77; the Creole from the central region of Chiapas78 and the Nunkiníen Creole, from the Yucatán Peninsula79. From 1965, individuals of the tropical dairy Creole and Romosinuano breeds, from the United States and Costa Rica, respectively, were also introduced80.

The Rarámuri Creole (RC) bovine, also called “Corriente”, is adapted to the northern region of the country, mainly in the Sierra Tarahumara, in the state of Chihuahua70. They are animals of small size and large horns; their main zootechnical purpose is for rodeo sports activities, so it is exported in large quantities to the United States7. The reproductive physiology of this breed of Creole cattle from Mexico is the most researched so far, this includes the characterization of the estrous cycle, ovarian activity, estrous behavior, hormonal profiles81-83 and development, and evaluation of synchronization and AI protocols (12,13.

Estrus and ovulation synchronization protocols in Rarámuri Creole cattle

In one of the first studies in RC cattle, a conventional protocol for FTAI was used, with the use of a CIDR (with 1.9 mg of P4) for 7 d, plus the application of 1 mg of β-estradiol at the beginning of treatment with P4; administration of 30 mg of PGF, via IM, when removing the CIDR; and 24 h after removing the CIDR, another dose of 1 mg of β-estradiol was applied. The FTAI was performed 54 h after removal of the CIDR. With this protocol, a percentage of gestation of 9.09 % was observed, despite the fact that 100 % of the cows showed signs of estrus. In this study, administering a dose of 50 mg of P4, via IM, at the time of removal the CIDR, in conjunction with the application of β-estradiol, did not improve the percentage of gestation (9.09 % was obtained with both treatments). The low percentage of pregnancy obtained with this protocol was attributed to a variation in the time to ovulation12. The cows showed estrus between 36 and 43 h after the application of PGF. The authors mention that letting so much time pass between the beginning of estrus and AI was a determining factor. It should be noted that the cows that had estrus between 36 and 37 h after removal of the CIDR did not become pregnant, while all the cows that showed estrus around 43 h after removal of the CIDR did become pregnant. It is also mentioned that anovulatory estruses occur in RC cows, so this contributes to a low percentage of gestation12.

In another study with RC cows, the time from the beginning of the PGF-induced estrus to ovulation was 46.2 ± 8.2 h and 37.6 ± 6.0 h in a natural estrus (all cows had estrus within 24 to 60 h), with a significant proportion of cows that ovulated in the range of 24-35 h in natural estrus (8 cows out of a total of 22). In both types of estrus, the highest percentage of cows ovulated in the range of 36-47 h (12 cows in natural estrus and 11 cows in induced estrus)82. This difference in the times from the beginning of estrus to ovulation, in RC females, with respect to Bos taurus taurus cattle, should be considered to improve the percentage of gestation with FTAI protocols, or consider the possibility of using the “AM-PM” rule to program AI, as mentioned by Zárate-Martínez et al12. However, performing this type of handling, which requires estrus detection, is impractical for RC cattle farmers.

The growth pattern of ovarian follicles is in waves; one to four waves may occur in each estrous cycle84-86. The number of follicular waves in each cycle is variable, with two to three waves being the most common85,86. In RC females, there is a higher percentage of cows with two follicular waves (77.3 %)81. Females that have two follicular waves per cycle ovulate on average 6.2 h earlier than cows with three waves83. In addition, the follicular growth rate in the RC breed (0.6 ± 0.2 mm d-1)82 is lower than in Bos taurus indicus cattle (0.9 ± 0.1 mm d-1) and other Bos taurus taurus breeds (1.1 ± 0.1 mm d-1)87. In this regard, Quezada et al82 mention that, in order to optimize the response to synchronization protocols in RC cows, it is necessary to modify the time between hormone treatment and AI, so they suggest performing AI ~28 h after the beginning of estrus82.

Use of eCG in Creole cattle

In Bos taurus taurus cattle, the application of eCG in protocol for FTAI helps to increase the follicular growth rate and diameter, as well as the production of P4, in females with low BC24. When evaluating the use of a dose of 400 IU of eCG at the time of FTAI (56 h after removal of the CIDR) in RC cows, with the use of a 8-d CO-Synch protocol (application of a dose of 100 μg of GnRH when inserting the CIDR + 25 mg of PGF when removing the CIDR, on d 8 of the protocol + 400 IU of eCG, at the time of FTAI), the percentage of gestation (31.5 vs 46.6 %) was not improved compared to the same protocol without eCG (in this treatment, 100 μg of GnRH was applied at the time of FTAI). The authors mention that the females were in an acceptable BC (4.5 ± 0.2; on a scale from 1 to 9) and received a good diet during reproductive management, so no positive effect of eCG was observed88. In this same study, supplementation with concentrate, selenium (0.95 mg Se/50 kg LW) or Ca propionate (100 g), did not modify the percentage of gestation either88.

In another study in which the use of a dose of 500 IU of eCG in RC cows was evaluated, a percentage of gestation of 60 % of the total number of females in the treatment (and 75 % of gestation compared to those that showed signs of estrus) was obtained13. The hormonal protocol used in this study consisted of the use of an CIDR for 7 d + 2.76 mg of EB at the start of treatment with P4 (d 0) + 25 mg PGF (d 7) + 1 mg of EC or 500 IU of eCG 24 h after removing the CIDR (d 9); the AI was performed 12 h after the beginning of estrus. The percentage of gestation in the group of cows treated with EC was 27.3 %. It should be noted that, in this study, 100 % of cows treated with EC and 80 % of those treated with eCG showed signs of estrus in response to the AI protocol and all females in both treatments ovulated. The response of the cows to both treatments was similar for the variables: response to estrus, percentage of ovulation and maximum follicular diameter13. When evaluating these same protocols in RC heifers, the response to estrus was lower in both treatments, 89.5 % and 25.0 % for EC and eCG treatments, respectively. The percentage of heifers that had silent estruses was 10.5 % for heifers in the group treated with EC and 75.0 % for those treated with eCG. The occurrence of silent estruses was attributed to a lower follicular growth than that observed with the use of EC. Because only females that showed signs of estrus were inseminated, the percentage of gestation with the use of eCG was only 10 %, compared to the total in the group (40 % of those that had estrus and were inseminated)13. However, 100 % of the heifers treated with eCG ovulated. In this study, in both cows and heifers, estrus occurred in a shorter time with EC (cows 24.9 ± 2.8 h and heifers 25.8 ± 2.9 h) compared to the treatment of eCG (31.5 ± 2.8 and 30.6 ± 2.9). Additionally, the authors mention the possibility of using FTAI successfully, in multiparous cows with the use of eCG, since, with this protocol, the beginning of estrus grouped between 24 and 36 h after removing the CIDR (31.5 ± 2.8 h on average) and the highest percentage of cows were inseminated 36 to 48 h after finishing the treatment with P4. In addition, the results of response to estrus and percentage of gestation obtained in this study are higher than those obtained by Zárate et al12 and Sánchez-Arciniega et al88 in this same breed of cattle.

Restart of postpartum ovulatory/cyclic activity

Postpartum (PP) anestrus is characterized by the absence of ovulations after calving. In this period, the ovarian follicles begin to grow, but none is able to ovulate, at least during the first weeks89. This is partly due to the absence of LH, and often, the first ovulation is not preceded by the manifestation of signs of estrus; the CL may have a reduced mean life, smaller size and limited steroidogenic activity90. To reduce the negative effect of suckling, it has been proposed to perform early weaning (EW, a few days after calving); controlled or restricted suckling (RS, it consists of allowing suckling in short periods of the day); or temporary weaning (TW, separating the calf from the mother for a few days)91. The RS technique increases the proportion of cows that show signs of estrus during the first 100 d postpartum and reduces the calving-first ovulation interval, without affecting the growth of calves91.

In RC cattle, with the RS strategy (beginning on day 76 PP), prior to the hormonal protocol for FTAI, 81.4 % of the cows ovulated within an observation period of 22 d after starting the RS, but only 11.1 % of them showed signs of estrus, that is, they had silent ovulations. In this study, the manifestation of estrous behavior was only observed in females with better BC (4-5, regular to good), while cows with poor BC (2-3, on a scale of 1-9) did not ovulate before the synchronization treatment12.

In another study in RC cattle, when assessing weight loss during lactation, cows that were treated with an EW scheme from 68 ± 3.8 d PP lost less weight than those that remained with the offspring (normal weaning at 180 ± 10.2 days) during the evaluation period. In females with EW, weight loss was 4.8 kg, while females in the group of normal weaning lost 18.9 kg during the evaluation period (68-180 d PP)92. As mentioned, as in other specialized bovine breeds11, BC in RC cattle is a limitation to re-establish reproductive activity after calving, and to establish gestation92. RC cattle are rarely supplemented, so there is no control over their body condition88. Therefore, performing strategies such as RS or EW in Creole cattle, in conjunction with the implementation of protocols for FTAI, could be useful to improve the percentage of gestation.

Estrus synchronization in other breeds of Creole cattle in Mexico

Information on the reproductive performance in response to protocols of estrus synchronization and AI in other breeds of Creole cattle in Mexico is limited. In Coreño Creole cows from Nayarit, with synchronization with a Norgestomet implant for 9 d + 280 IU of eCG, 80 % response to estrus and a percentage of gestation of 60 %93 were obtained.

In the Chinampo breed, the use of two doses of PGF (11 d apart between each application) to induce estrus and evaluate the estrous behavior in the presence of the bull was evaluated94. In the presence of the bull, greater interaction was found between 30 and 60 h after the second dose of PGF. Cows exposed to the bull started estrus in less time and had a shorter estrus length than those that remained isolated from the bull (10.7 ± 1.1 h vs 16.3 ± 2.6 h).

In purebred and crossbred heifers of the tropical dairy Creole breed, an estrus response of 94.1 % and a percentage of gestation of 68.8 % were found; with the addition of a dose of 500 IU of eCG, on day 10, of a protocol with a subcutaneous implant (with 3 mg of norgestomet, for 12 d + 5 mg of estradiol valerate, EV, via IM on d 0). While with a dose of 0.25 mg of GnRH, 24 h after removal of the implant (implant with 3 mg of norgestomet, for 12 d + 5 mg of EV, via IM on d 0), 76.4 % of females showed estrus and 46.2 % of them became pregnant95. In this protocol, a dose of 15 mg of PGF was applied, via IM, 10 d before placing the subcutaneous implant; to homogenize the estrous cycle. Table 2 summarizes the results obtained in Creole cattle, with the use of various estrous and AI synchronization protocols.

Table 2 Summary of gestation percentages obtained with hormonal protocols in Creole cattle in Mexico 

Breed† Protocol‡ Gestation
(%)
Reference
Cows RC CIDR for 7 d + 1 mg E2 + 50 mg P4 (d 0) + 30 mg PGF (d 7) + 1 mg E2 (d 8) 9.1 12
Cows RC CIDR for 7 d-1 + 1 mg E2 (d 0) + 30 mg PGF (d 7) + 1 mg E2 (d 8) 9.1 12
Cows RC CIDR for 7 d-1, 100 μg GnRH + 25 mg PGF (d 8) + 400 IU 56 h after removal of the CIDR 31.5 88
Cows RC CIDR for 7 d-1, 100 μg GnRH + 25 mg PGF (d 8) + 100 μg 56 h after removal of the CIDR 46.6 88
Cows RC CIDR for 7 d + 2.76 mg EB (d 0) + 25 mg PGF (d 7) + 1 mg EC (d 9) 27.3 13
Cows RC CIDR for 7 d-1 + 2.76 mg EB (d 0) + 25 mg PGF (d 7) + 500 IU eCG (d 9) 60.0 13
Cows Coreño Norgestomet implant for 9 days + 280 IU eCG 60.0 93
Heifers RC CIDR for 7 d + 2.76 mg EB (d 0) + 25 mg PGF (d 7) + 1 mg EC (d 9) 27.3 13
Heifers RC CIDR for 7 d + 2.76 mg EB (d 0) + 25 mg PGF (day 7) + 500 IU eCG (d 9) 60.0 13
Heifers TDC 15 mg PGF (d-10) + Subcutaneous implant (3 mg norgestomet) for 12 d-1 + 5 mg EV, 500 IU eCG (d 10) 68.8 95
Heifers TDC 15 mg PGF (d-10) + Subcutaneous implant (3 mg norgestomet) for 12 d-1 + 5 mg EV (d 0) + 0.25 mg GnRH (d 10) 46.2 95

†RC= Ráramuri Creole. TDC= tropical dairy Creole. ‡CIDR= intravaginal progesterone release device; E2= estradiol; EV: estradiol valerate; PGF2α= prostaglandin F; GnRH= gonadotropin-releasing hormone; IU= international units; EB= estradiol benzoate; eCG= equine chorionic gonadotropin; EC= estradiol cypionate.

Factors associated with the reproductive response in Creole cattle

There are physiological differences between Creole cattle and European cattle specialized in beef production, as well as with zebu cattle. Among these, those inherent to ovarian functioning stand out: number of follicular waves, follicular growth rate, diameter of the ovulatory follicle and of the CL; and concentration of reproductive hormones and periods between events of the estrous cycle (length of luteal phase vs follicular phase; time to ovulation, length of estrus)82,83,85. Additionally, external factors such as nutritional status, handling, social and hierarchical relationships38 influence the response of Creole cattle to hormonal protocols for FTAI.

Reproductive behavior, ovarian function and endocrinology in the Creole female

The estrous cycle in RC cows has an average length of 21.1 ± 1.2 d (range of 19-23 d), with a follicular phase of 6-9 d and a luteal phase of 12-16 d88. Follicular growth in cattle occurs in a pattern of follicular waves, and the number of follicular waves in each estrous cycle is variable, but it can range from two to four waves. In RC cows, there is a higher percentage of females with two follicular waves (77.3 %), and a smaller percentage of females with three follicular waves per cycle (22.7 %)82. In Bos taurus taurus females84, Bos taurus indicus females85, Thai Creole females86, a higher percentage of females with two follicular waves per cycle has also been observed. Contrary to these findings, in Caqueteño Creole cattle from Colombia9, in Creole heifers with dairy tendency in Ecuador96, and Creole cattle from the high Andean zone of Peru86, there is a higher percentage of females with three follicular waves (Table 3). However, so far there is no published information on follicular dynamics in other breeds of Creole cattle from Mexico.

Table 3 Number of follicular waves in the estrous cycle in Creole cattle, Bos taurus taurus and Bos taurus indicus 

Breed Number of follicular waves (%)
2 3 4
Rarámuri from Chihuahua, Mexico 82 77.3 22.7
Caqueteño from Colombia 9 33.3 66.6
Creole from the high Andean zone of Peru 86 16.0 78.0 6.0
Creole from the highlands of Ecuador 96 44.4 55.6
Native Thai (97 70.0 30.0
Nelore (85 83.3 16.6
Holstein (84 81.0 19.0

The characterization of the estrous cycle and follicular dynamics in different cattle breeds has allowed observing differences and similarities between them (Table 4). In Caqueteño and Nelore Creole cattle, females with three follicular waves have longer estrous cycles than females with two waves9,85. In RC cows, the length of the estrous cycle, follicular phase and luteal phase is similar between females with two and three follicular waves, but females with two follicular waves ovulate 6.2 h before than those with three follicular waves82,83. The ovulatory follicles of RC females with two waves grow at a lower rate than those with three waves (0.5 ± 0.04 vs 0.9 ± 0.08, respectively), while the maximum diameter of the ovulatory follicle is similar between both growth patterns (10.5 ± 0.2 vs 10.0 ± 0.4, respectively)83. The maximum diameter of the CL in RC cows with two and three follicular waves is similar (13.0 ± 1.0 vs 13.2 ± 1.7 mm, respectively)83. The size of the CL and the production of P4 in RC cows are also smaller than those of other cattle breeds, and it is possible that these differences are adaptations to the environmental and nutritional conditions that Creole cattle have developed to survive in difficult environments83.

Table 4 Follicular and ovulatory dynamics in cattle with two and three follicular waves 

Breed
Rarámuri from Mexico 83 Creole from Ecuador 96 Caqueteño from Colombia 9 Native Thai 97 Holstein 84
Number of waves 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 1 2
Estrous cycle length, days 21.1±0.3 21.4±0.6 20.3±0.0 23.6±0.0 20±0.6 22±0.5 18.60±0.1 20.38±0.1
First wave (non-ovulatory)
Emergence, days † −0.5±0.2 −0.4±0.2 1 1 3 4 1.53±0.1 1.54±0.1 -2.0+0-1 -0.5±0.3
Maximum DF diameter‡, mm 8.0±0.1 7.6±0.3 13.2±2.2 12.2±1.7 8.4±1.3 11.7±3.3 7.63±0.1 7.67±0.1 17.1±0.5 16.0±0.4
Growth rate, mm day-1 0.5±0.03 0.7±0.0 1.0±0.1 1.2±0.0 - - 0.65±0.0 0.75±0.1 - -
Regression, days 11.0±0.8 7.8±0.4 - - 11 10.0±0.5 8.34±0.1 8.79±0.1 13.0+0.4 12.2±0.5
Second wave (non-ovulatory)
Emergence, days - 9.6±0.5 - 6.6±0.0 - 10.0 - 8.38±0.1 9.0
Maximum DF diameter, mm - 7.2±0.2 - 10.2±0.0 - 12.2±4.4 - 6.79±0.2 12.9±0.7
Growth rate, mm day-1 - 0.4±0.08 - 1.1±0.1 - - - 0.75±0.1 - -
Regression, days - 14.8±0.8 - - 17.0±0.5 - 12.58±0.1 19
Ovulatory wave
Emergence, days 11.2±0.8 14.8±0.8 7.8±1.6 13,2±1.3 11.0 17.0 11.02±0.1 11.33±0.1 9.6±0.2 16.0±1.1
Maximum DF diameter, mm 10.5±0.2 10.0±0.4 15.3±0.0 13.8±1.4 7.5±1.1 13.8±3.6 8.81±0.2 8.14±0.2 16.5±0.4 13.9±0.4
Growth rate, mm day-1 0.5±0.04 0.9±0.08 0.9±0.1 1.1±0.2 - - 1.07±0.0 1.48±0.1 - -
Ovulation, days 22.0 22.5 20.0 23.0 20.0±0.6 22.0±0.5 19.44±0.1 21.13±0.2 20.4+0.3 22.8+0.6
Corpus luteum (CL)
Maximum CL diameter, mm 13.0±1.0 13.2±1.7 21.7±1.4 23.5±0.6 11.3±4.3 11.2±3.2 13.55±0.1 15.14±0.1 - -
Maximum P4 concentration, ng/ml 6.5±0.1 6.5±0.2 20.6±5.4 20.6±3.1 - - 4.13±0.1 4.25±0.1 - -
Regression, days 16.3±1.6 16.8±1.1 18.0 20.0 17.0±1 19±0.96 17.11±0.1 19.29±0.1 16.5±0.4 19.2±0.5

† The moment of ovulation (day 0) was used as a reference to determine the beginning of the cycle, so it is possible to observe the emergence of the next follicular wave before ovulation. In the Rarámuri, the evaluation of both ovaries was performed every 8 h after the start of estrus (day 0 = day of ovulation).

‡DF: Dominant follicle.

Social and hierarchical interaction of the RC

In RC cattle, the existence of dominance relationships between females of higher rank over those of lower hierarchical rank has been observed12. The social dominance in this type of cattle is not only determined by age, but also by the type of horns (as mentioned, this type of cattle has large horns in relation to the size of the body, which is why they are used for rodeo). Females with horn defects have difficulty defending themselves and their offspring during suckling, so they end up escaping or giving up space12.

Another factor that can influence the percentage of gestation is the temperament of animals; animals with aggressive temperament tend to have a lower reproductive performance than animals with a docile temperament98. Aggressive temperament disrupts physiological events necessary for reproduction, is associated with increased synthesis and circulating concentrations of adrenocorticotropin (ACTH) and cortisol, which can alter the key physiological events necessary to achieve puberty and the release of the preovulatory wave of GnRH/LH99. On the contrary, a calmer temperament leads to higher rates of estrus occurrence and gestation, as well as fewer embryonic losses100. Additionally, the social system of cattle is very hierarchical. Hierarchy influences the intake of feed and social behavior101. In addition, low-ranking cows adopt a passive attitude as a behavioral strategy to reduce stress. Hierarchy also influences reproduction: stressed and low-ranking mothers produce less LH, which interferes with ovulation and estrous behavior38.

Conclusions

The use of reproductive biotechnologies such as estrus and AI synchronization is limited in Creole cattle and the results obtained are variable. Among the factors that modify the response to synchronization are the reproductive physiology of the Creole cattle, body condition and hierarchical relationships. The review of the existing information on the response in Creole cattle to the use of synchronization protocols allows proposing the lines of research to be developed, and they should be focused on the comparative study of reproductive biology, adaptation of hormonal protocols considering the particularities of Creole cattle and the nutrition, handling and reproduction interaction. Finally, reproductive biotechnologies adapted to Creole cattle may be incorporated into programs of conservation and rational use of this animal genetic resource.

Literatura citada

1. O’Neill CJ, Swain DL, Kadarmideen HN. Evolutionary process of Bos taurus cattle in favourable versus unfavourable environments and its implications for genetic selection. Evol Appl 2010;(5-6): 422-433. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-4571.2010.00151.x. [ Links ]

2. McManus C, Prescott E, Paludo GR, Bianchini E, Louvandini H, Mariante AS. Heat tolerance in naturalized Brazilian cattle breeds. Livest Sci 2009;120(3):256-264. doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2008.07.014. [ Links ]

3. Espinoza V, Ortega PR, Palacios EA, Guillén TA. Tolerancia al calor y humedad atmosférica de diferentes grupos raciales de ganado bovino. Rev MVZ Córdoba. 2011;16(1):2009-2011. [ Links ]

4. Ndlovu T, Chimonyo M, Muchenje V. Monthly changes in body condition scores and internal parasite prevalence in Nguni, Bonsmara and Angus steers raised on sweetveld. Trop Anim Health Prod 2009;41:1169-1177. doi:10.1007/s11250-008-9297-0. [ Links ]

5. Delgado JV, Martínez MA, Acosta A, Álvarez LA, Armstrong E, Camacho E, et al. Genetic characterization of Latin-America creole cattle using microsatellite markers. Anim Genet 2011;43(1):2-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2011.02207.x. [ Links ]

6. FAO. The State of the World’s Biodiversity for Food and Agriculture, J. Bélanger, D. Pilling editors. FAO Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture Assessments. Rome. 2019. [ Links ]

7. Callejas-Juarez N, Aranda-Gutiérrez H, Martínez-Nevárez J, Juárez-Beltrán L. Comercialización del ganado criollo para rodeo en el Estado de Chihuahua. Rev Mex Agroneg 2011; Vol. Esp:72-81. [ Links ]

8. Segura-Correa JC, Montes-Pérez RC. Razones y estrategias para la conservación de los recursos genéticos animales. Rev Biomed 2001;12:196-206. [ Links ]

9. López-Rojas R, Celis-Parra G, Tovar-Claros G, García-Gasca A, García-Bustos J. Ovarian follicular dynamics in caqueteño creole cattle breed at the colombian amazon piedmont. Am J Anim Vet Sci 2019;14(2):101-10. doi: 10.3844/ajavsp.2019.101.110. [ Links ]

10. Shahid B, Khan MI, Andrabi SMH, Razzaq A, Khan MN. Estrus duration and expression in natural and induced estrus in indigenous (Bos indicus) cattle. J Anim Plant Sci 2019;29(3):645-649. [ Links ]

11. Diskin MG, Kenny DA. Managing the reproductive performance of beef cows. Theriogenology 2016;86 (1):379-87. doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2016.04.052. [ Links ]

12. Zárate-Martínez JP, Ramírez-Godínez JA, Rodríguez-Almeida FA. Comportamiento reproductivo de vacas criollas con amamantamiento restringido y sincronización del estro. Agro Meso 2010;21(1):121-130. [ Links ]

13. Quezada-Casasola A, Beltrán-Prieto L, Macías-Cruz U, Avendaño-Reyes L, Ramírez-Godínez J. Comparison of equine chorionic gonadotropin (eCG) and oestradiol cypionate administered 24 h after CIDR removal during an oestrus synchronization protocol for artificial insemination in Mexican Criollo cattle. Vet Arhiv 2016;86(3):437-51. doi.org/10.1071/AN12334. [ Links ]

14. Lamb GC, Dahlen CR, Larson JE, Marquezini G, Stevenson JS. Control of the estrous cycle to improve fertility for fixed-time artificial insemination in beef cattle: a review. J Anim Sci 2010;(18):181-92. doi: 10.2527/jas.2009-2349. [ Links ]

15. Bó GA, Huguenine E, Javier J, de la Mata JJ, Núñez-Olivera R, Baruselli PS, et al. Programs for fixed-time artificial insemination in South American beef cattle. Anim Reprod 2018;15(Suppl.1):952-962. doi: 10.21451/1984-3143-AR2018-0025. [ Links ]

16. Bó GA, de la Mata JJ, Baruselli PS, Menchaca A. Alternative programs for synchronizing and resynchronizing ovulation in beef cattle. Theriogenology 2016;86(1):388-96. dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2016.04.053. [ Links ]

17. Bridges GA, Mussard ML, Helser LA, Day ML. Comparison of follicular dynamics and hormone concentrations between the 7-day and 5-day CO-Synch + CIDR program in primiparous beef cows. Theriogenology 2014;81(4):632-638. dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2013.11.020. [ Links ]

18. Vasconcelos JLM, Carvalho R, Peres RFG, Rodrigues ADP, Junior IC, Meneghetti M, et al. Reproductive programs for beef cattle: Incorporating management and reproductive techniques for better fertility. Anim Reprod 2017;14(3):547-57. doi: 10.21451/1984-3143-AR998. [ Links ]

19. Smith MF, Pohler KG, Perry GA, Patterson D. Physiological factors that affect pregnancy rate to artificial insemination in beef cattle. Proc Applied Reprod Strat Beef Cattle. 2013:27-45. [ Links ]

20. Martínez MF, Kastelic JP, Bó GA, Caccia M, Mapletoft RJ. Effects of oestradiol and some of its esters on gonadotrophin release and ovarian follicular dynamics in CIDR-treated beef cattle. Anim Reprod Sci 2005;86(1-2):37-52. doi:10.1016/j.anireprosci.2004.06.005. [ Links ]

21. Bó GA, Baruselli PS, Mapletoft RJ. Synchronization techniques to increase the utilization of artificial insemination in beef and dairy cattle. Anim Reprod 2013;10(3):137-142. [ Links ]

22. Colazo MG, Mapletoft RJ. A review of current timed-AI (TAI) programs for beef and dairy cattle. Can Vet J 2014;(55):772-780. [ Links ]

23. Colazo MG, Kastelic JP, Mapletoft RJ. Effects of estradiol cypionate (ECP) on ovarian follicular dynamics, synchrony of ovulation, and fertility in CIDR-based, fixed-time AI programs in beef heifers. Theriogenology 2003;60(5):855-865. doi:10.1016/S0093-691X(03)00091-8. [ Links ]

24. Nuñez-Olivera R, de Castro T, García-Pintos C, Bó G, Piaggio J, Menchaca A. Ovulatory response and luteal function after eCG administration at the end of a progesterone and estradiol’ based treatment in postpartum anestrous beef cattle. Anim Reprod Sci 2014;146:111-116. doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2014.02.017. [ Links ]

25. Baruselli PS, Reis EL, Marques MO, Nasser LF, Bó GA. The use of hormonal treatments to improve reproductive performance of anestrous beef cattle in tropical climates. Anim Reprod Sci 2004;(82-83):479-486. doi:10.1016/j.anireprosci.2004.04.025. [ Links ]

26. Marquezini GHL, Mercadante VRG, Olson KC, Jaeger JR, Perry GA, Lamb GC. Effects of equine chorionic gonadotropin on follicle development and pregnancy rates in suckled beef cows with or without calf removal. J Anim Sci 2013;91:1216-1224. doi: 10.2527/jas.2012-5382. [ Links ]

27. Martinez MF, Tutt D, Quirke LD, Tattersfield G, Juengel JL. Development of a GnRH-PGF2α-progesterone-based synchronization protocol with eCG for inducing single and double ovulations in beef cattle. J Anim Sci 2014;92(11):4935-4948. doi: 10.2527/jas.2013-7512. [ Links ]

28. Baruselli PS, Sá Filho MF, Ferreira RM, Sales JNS, Gimenes LU, Vieira LM, et al. Manipulation of follicle development to ensure optimal oocyte quality and conception rates in cattle. Reprod Dom Anim. 2012;47(Suppl 4):134-141. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0531.2012.02067.x. [ Links ]

29. Pursley JR, Wiltbank MC, Stevenson JS, Ottobre JS, Garverick, HA, Anderson LL. Pregnancy rates per artificial insemination for cows and heifers inseminated at a synchronized ovulation or synchronized estrus. J Dairy Sci 1997;80:295-300. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302 (97) 75937-X. [ Links ]

30. Pursley JR, Mee MO, Wiltbank MC. Synchronization of ovulation in dairy cows using PGF2α and GnRH. Theriogenology 1995;44(7): 915-923. doi: 10.1016/0093-691x (95) 00279-h. [ Links ]

31. Geary TW, Whittier JC. Effects of a timed insemination following synchronization of ovulation using the Ovsynch or CO- Synch protocol in beef cows. Prof Anim Sci 1998;14:217−220. [ Links ]

32. Geary TW, Whittier JC, Downing ER, LeFever DG, Silcox RW, Holland MD, et al. Pregnancy rates of postpartum beef cows that were synchronized using Syncro-Mate-B or the Ovsynch protocol. J Anim Sci 1998;76:1523−1527. doi: 10.2527 / 1998.7661523x. [ Links ]

33. Geary TW, Whittier JC, Hallford DM, MacNeil MD. Calf removal improves conception rates to the Ovsynch and CO-Synch protocols. J Anim Sci 2001;79:1-4. doi: 10.2527/2001.7911 [ Links ]

34. Lamb GC, Stevenson JS, Kesler DJ, Garverick HA, Brown DR, Salfen BE. Inclusion of an intravaginal progesterone insert plus GnRH and prostaglandin F2α for ovulation control in postpartum suckled beef cows. J Anim Sci 2001;79(9):2253-2259. doi: 10.2527/2001.7992253x. [ Links ]

35. Martínez MF, Kastelic JP, Adams GP, Cook B, Olson WO, Mapletoft RJ. The use of progestins in regimens for fixed-time artificial insemination in beef cattle. Theriogenology 2002;57(3):1049-1059. doi: 10.1016/s0093-691x(01)00682-3. [ Links ]

36. Moreira F, Orlandi C, Risco CA, Mattos R, Lopes F, Thatcher WW. Effects of presynchronization and bovine somatotropin on pregnancy rates to a timed artificial insemination protocol in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2001;84(7):1646-1659. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(01)74600-0. [ Links ]

37. Small JA, Colazo MG, Kastelic JP, Erickson NE, Mapletoft RJ. Effects of presynchronization and eCG on pregnancy rates to GnRH-based, fixed-time artificial insemination in beef heifers. Can J Anim Sci 2010;90(1):23-34. doi.org/10.4141/CJAS09058. [ Links ]

38. Fernandez-Novo A, Pérez-Garnelo SS, Villagrá A, Pérez-Villalobos N, Astiz S. The effect of stress on reproduction and reproductive technologies in beef cattle-A review. Animals. 2020;10(11):1-23. doi: 10.3390/ani10112096. [ Links ]

39. Bridges GA, Helser LA, Grum DE, Mussard ML, Gasser CL, Day ML. Decreasing the interval between GnRH and PGF2alpha from 7 to 5 days and lengthening proestrus increases timed-AI pregnancy rates in beef cows. Theriogenology 2008;69:843-851. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2007.12.011. [ Links ]

40. Geary TW, Smith MF, Macneil MD, Day ML, Bridges GA, Perry GA, et al. Triennial Reproduction Symp: Influence of follicular characteristics at ovulation on early embryonic survival. J Anim Sci 2013;91:3014-3021. doi: 10.2527/jas.2012-5887. [ Links ]

41. de la Mata JJ, Bo GA. Sincronización de celos y ovulación utilizando protocolos con benzoato de estradiol y GnRH en períodos reducidos de inserción de un dispositivo con progesterona en vaquillonas para carne. Taurus 2012;55:17-23. [ Links ]

42. de la Mata JJ, Ré M, Bo GA. Combination of oestrus detection and fixed-time artificial insemination in beef heifers following a shortened oestradiol-based protocol that provides for a lengthened proestrus. Reprod Fertil Dev 2014;27:96-97. 10.1071/RDv27n1Ab8. [ Links ]

43. de La Mata JJ, Núñez-Olivera R, Cuadro F, Bosolasco D, de Brun V, Meikle A, et al. Effects of extending the length of pro-oestrus in an oestradiol- and progesterone-based oestrus synchronisation program on ovarian function, uterine environment and pregnancy establishment in beef heifers. Reprod Fertil Dev 2018;30(11):1541-52. doi: 10.1071/RD17473. [ Links ]

44. Peralta-Torre JA, Aké-López JR, Centurión-Castro FG, Magaña-Monforte JG. Comparación del cipionato de estradiol vs benzoato de estradiol sobre la respuesta a estro y tasa de gestación en protocolos de sincronización con CIDR en novillas y vacas Bos indicus. Universidad y Ciencia 2010;26(2):163-169. [ Links ]

45. Melo LF, Monteiro PLJ, Surjus RS, Drum JN, Wiltbank MC, Sartori R. Progesterone-based fixed-time artificial insemination protocols for dairy cows: Gonadotropin-releasing hormone versus estradiol benzoate at initiation and estradiol cypionate versus estradiol benzoate at the end. J Dairy Sci 2016;99(11):9227-9237. doi: 10.3168/jds.2016-11220. [ Links ]

46. Herrera-Alvarez R, Pugliesi G, Nogueira-Natal FL, Constantino-Rocha C, Ataide-Júnior GA, Ferreira-Melo AJ, et al. Reproductive performance of Bos indicus beef cows treated with different doses of equine chorionic gonadotropin at the end of a progesterone-estrogen based protocol for fixed-time artificial insemination. Theriogenology 2018;118:150-6. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2018.06.003 [ Links ]

47. Menchaca A, Nuñez-Olivera R, Cuadro F, Bo G. Pregnancy rates in beef heifers synchronized with a shortened oestradiol-based treatment that provides for a prolonged proestrus. Reprod Fertil Dev 2014;27(1):96-96. doi.org/10.1071/RDv27n1Ab7. [ Links ]

48. Sales JNS, Bottino MP, Silva LACL, Girotto RW, Massoneto JPM, Souza JC, et al. Effects of eCG are more pronounced in primiparous than multiparous Bos indicus cows submitted to a timed artificial insemination protocol. Theriogenology 2016;86(9):2290-2295. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2016.07.023. [ Links ]

49. Yáñez-Avalos DO, López-Parra JC, Moyano-Tapia JC, Quinteros-Pozo RO, Marini PR. Inseminación artificial a tiempo fijo en vacas con proestro prolongado. Agron Mesoam 2018;29(2):363-73. dx.doi.org/10.15517/ma.v29i2.29503. [ Links ]

50. Sales JNS, Carvalho JBP, Crepaldi GA, Cipriano RS, Jacomini JO, Maio JRG, et al. Effects of two estradiol esters (benzoate and cypionate) on the induction of synchronized ovulations in Bos indicus cows submitted to a timed artificial insemination protocol. Theriogenology 2012;78(3):510-516. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2012.02.031. [ Links ]

51. Bastos-Souza AL, Saporski-Segui M, Ernandes-Kozicki L, Romulado-Weiss R, Abreu A, Formighieri-Bertol MA, et al. Impact of equine chorionic gonadotropin associated with temporary weaning, estradiol benzoate, or estradiol cypionate on timed artificial insemination in primiparous Bos indicus cows. Braz Arch Biol Technol 2016;59:1-7. doi.org/10.1590/1678-4324-2016150389. [ Links ]

52. Sá Filho MF, Crespilho AM, Santos JEP, Perry GA, Baruselli PS. Ovarian follicle diameter at timed insemination and estrous response influence likelihood of ovulation and pregnancy after estrous synchronization with progesterone or progestin-based protocols in suckled Bos indicus cows. Anim Reprod Sci 2010;120:23-30. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2010.03.007. [ Links ]

53. Mion B, Bonotto RM, Farias CO, Rosa FS, Pradiee J, Rovani MT, et al. J-Synch protocol associated with estrus detection in beef heifers and non-lactating cows. Review. Medicina Veterinária 2019;13(2): 269-274. doi.org/10.26605/medvet-v13n2-3089. [ Links ]

54. Brusveen DJ, Cunha AP, Silva CD, Cunha PM, Sterry RA, Silva EPB, et al. Altering the time of the second gonadotropin-releasing hormone injection and artificial insemination (AI) during ovsynch affects pregnancies per AI in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2008;91(3):1044-1052. doi: 10.3168/jds.2007-0409. [ Links ]

55. Navanukraw C, Redmer DA, Reynolds LP, Kirsch JD, Grazul-Bilska AT, Fricke PM. A modified presynchronization protocol improves fertility to timed artificial insemination in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2004;87(5):1551-1557. doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73307-X. [ Links ]

56. Rodríguez-Martínez R, Neri ICC, Meza-Herrera CA, Alvarado-Espino AS, Cruz JLM, González-Álvarez VH, et al. Reproductive efficiency of Ovsynch + CIDR in Holstein cows under a fixed time artificial insemination scheme in northern Mexico. Rev Mex Cienc Pecu 2018;9(3):506-517. doi.org/10.22319/rmcp.v9i3.4300. [ Links ]

57. Flores-Domínguez S, Muñoz-Flores LR, López-Ordaz R, Flores-Aréchiga CF, Mapes G, Hernández-Cerón J. Pregnancy in dairy cows with two protocols for synchronization of ovulation and timed artificial insemination. Rev Mex Cienc Pecu 2015;6(4):393-404. [ Links ]

58. Echternkamp SE, Thallman RM. Factors affecting pregnancy rate to estrous synchronization and fixed-time artificial insemination in beef cattle. J Anim Sci . 2011;89(10):3060-8. doi: 10.2527/jas.2010-3549. [ Links ]

59. Ahmadzadeh A, Gunn D, Hall JB, Glaze JB. Evaluation of treatment with a 5-day versus 7-day controlled internal drug-release insert on reproductive outcomes of beef heifers using a modified timed-artificial insemination protocol. Prof Anim Sci 2015; 31(3):270-277. doi.org/ 10.15232/pas.2014-01378. [ Links ]

60. Whittier WD, Currin JF, Schramm H, Holland S, Kasimanickam RK. Fertility in Angus cross beef cows following 5-day CO-Synch + CIDR or 7-day CO-Synch + CIDR estrus synchronization and timed artificial insemination. Theriogenology 2013;80(9):963-9. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2013.07.019. [ Links ]

61. Hill SL, Perry GA, Mercadante VRG, Lamb GC, Jaeger JR, Olson KC, et al. Altered progesterone concentrations by hormonal manipulations before a fixed-time artificial insemination CO-Synch + CIDR program in suckled beef cows. Theriogenology 2014;82(1):104-13. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2014.03.008. [ Links ]

62. Kasimanickam RK, Firth P, Schuenemann GM, Whitlock BK, Gay JM, Moore DA, et al. Effect of the first GnRH and two doses of PGF2α in a 5-day progesterone-based CO-Synch protocol on heifer pregnancy. Theriogenology 2014;81(6):797-804. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2013.12.023. [ Links ]

63. Gunn PJ, Culp KC, Lemenager RP, Bridges GA. Efficacy of the 5-day CO-Synch ovulation synchronization protocol with or without the inclusion of exogenous progesterone in beef cows. Prof Anim Sci 2016; 32(1):82-89. doi: 10.15232/pas.2015-01423. [ Links ]

64. Bridges GA, Ahola JK, Brauner C, Cruppe LH, Currin JC, Day ML, et al. Determination of the appropriate delivery of prostaglandin F in the five-day CO-Synch + controlled intravaginal drug release protocol in suckled beef cows. J Anim Sci 2012;90:4814-22. doi.org/10.2527/jas.2011-4880. [ Links ]

65. Corpron MR, Menegatti-Zoca S, Reynolds M, Carnahan K, Hall JB, Ahmadzadeh A. Evaluating the effects of a high-concentration dose of prostaglandin F in a 5-d CO-Synch + controlled internal drug release protocol on fertility in beef cows. Transl Anim Sci 2019;3(Supl 1):1754-1757. doi: 10.1093/tas/txz081. [ Links ]

66. Lima FS, Ribeiro ES, Bisinotto RS, Greco LF, Martinez N, Amstalden M, et al. Hormonal manipulations in the 5-day timed artificial insemination protocol to optimize estrous cycle synchrony and fertility in dairy heifers. J Dairy Sci 2013;96(11):7054-65. doi.org/10.3168/jds.2013-7093. [ Links ]

67. Macmillan K, Gobikrushanth M, Sanz A, Bignell D, Boender G, Macrae L, et al. Comparison of the effects of two shortened timed-AI protocols on pregnancy per AI in beef cattle. Theriogenology 2020;142:85-91. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2019.09.038 [ Links ]

68. García-Martínez B. Los primeros pasos del ganado en México. Relaciones. Estudios de Historia y Sociedad. 1994;59:11-44. [ Links ]

69. Ulloa-Arvizu R, Gayosso-Vázquez, Ramos-Kuri M, Estrada MJ, Montaño M, Alonso RA. Genetic analysis of Mexican Criollo cattle populations. J Anim Breed Genet 2008;125:351-359. [ Links ]

70. Russell ND, Rios J, Erosa G, Remmenga MD, Hawkins DE. Genetic differentiation among geographically isolated populations of Criollo cattle and their divergence from other Bos taurus breeds. J Anim Sci 2000;78(9):2314-22. doi: 10.2527/2000.7892314x [ Links ]

71. DAD-IS. 2021. Base de datos sobre la diversidad de los animales domésticos. FAO. Roma, Italia. [ [http://dad.fao.org/ ]. Consultado 16 Nov, 2021. [ Links ]

72. Espinoza-Villavicencio JL, Guevara Franco JA, Palacios-Espinosa A. Caracterización morfométrica y faneróptica del bovino criollo Chinampo de México. Arch Zoot 2009;58(222):277-279. [ Links ]

73. Espinoza JV, López RA, Ortega RP, Palacios AE, Guillén AT, Hernández HC. Hábitos de amamantamiento del ganado bovino Chinampo (Bos taurus) de México. Rev MVZ Córdoba 2011;16(3):2686-2691. doi.org/10.21897/rmvz.269. [ Links ]

74. Villaseñor-González F, de La Torre-Sánchez JF, Martínez-Velázquez G, Álvarez-Gallardo H, Pérez-Reynozo S, Palacios- Fránquéz JA, et al. Caracterización de la respuesta ovárica a la superovulación en bovino Criollo Coreño utilizando dosis reducidas de FSH. Rev Mex Cienc Pecu 2017;8(3):225-32. doi.org/10.22319/rmcp.v8i3.4498. [ Links ]

75. Moreno-Flores LA, Macías-Coronel H, Martínez-Velázquez G, Guerrero-Bustamante JJ. Aspectos reproductivos del bovino Criollo Coreño y sus cruzas en el trópico. Abanico Vet 2012;2(1):32-40. [ Links ]

76. Méndez Palacios N, Rosas García M, Serrano Palapa J, Avila Benítez R, Méndez Mendoza M. Caracterización morfométrica del bovino Criollo Mixteco. Caracterización morfométrica del bovino criollo mixteco. Arch Zoot ec 2002;51:217-221. [ Links ]

77. Hernández-Beltrán A, Cervantes-Acosta P, Gómez-Boucrin F, Domínguez-Mancera B, Barrientos-Morales M. Los Bovinos Criollos en el Golfo de México. In: Perezgrovas-Grovas. RA, de la Torre-Sánchez F, editors. Los bovinos criollos de México, historia caracterización y perspectivas. 1st ed. Chiapas, México: Universidad Autónoma de Chiapas; 2015:209-235. [ Links ]

78. Perezgrovas R, Vázquez D, Rodríguez G, Galdámez D. Aproximación fenotípica a la diversidad de los bovinos criollos en la región central montañosa de Chiapas, México. Actas Iberoamericanas de Conservación Animal 2011;1:384-387. [ Links ]

79. López-Caraveo E. Caracterización etnológica de vacas criollas en el estado de Campeche [Tesis maestría]. Tecnológico Nacional de México Instituto, Tecnológico de Conkal. 2019. [ Links ]

80. Parra-Cortés RI, Magaña-Magaña MA. Vacas, toros y bueyes criollos en peligro. Ecofronteras 2020;24(68):26-29. [ Links ]

81. Quezada-Casasola A, Avendaño-Reyes L, Macías-Cruz U, Ramírez-Godínez JA, Rivas-Cáceres RR. Estrous behavior, ovulatory follicle dynamics, and corpus luteum size in creole cows after spontaneous or prostaglandin F-induced estrous. Rev Colomb Cienc Pecu 2015;28(4):303-12. doi: 10.17533/udea.rccp.v28n4a02. [ Links ]

82. Quezada-Casasola A, Avendaño-Reyes L, Ramírez-Godínez JA, MacÍas-Cruz U, Correa-Calderón A. Behavioural, follicular and hormonal characteristics of the oestrous cycle of Mexican Criollo cattle. Anim Prod Sci 2013;54(3):277-284. dx.doi.org/10.1071/AN12334. [ Links ]

83. Quezada-Casasola A, Avendaño-Reyes L, Macías-Cruz U, Ramírez-Godínez JA, Correa-Calderón A. Estrus behavior, ovarian dynamics, and progesterone secretion in Criollo cattle during estrous cycles with two and three follicular waves. Trop Anim Health Prod 2014;46(4):675-84. doi:10.1007/s11250-014-0562-0. [ Links ]

84. Ginther OJ, Knopf L, Kastelic JP. Temporal associations among ovarian events in cattle during oestrous cycles with two and three follicular waves. J Reprod Fert 1989;87:223-230. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0870223. [ Links ]

85. Figueiredo RA, Barros CM, Pinheiro’ OL, Soler JMP. Ovarian folicular dynamics in Nelore breed (Bos indicus) cattle. Theriogenology 1997;47:1489-1505. doi: 10.1016/s0093-691x(97)00156-8. [ Links ]

86. Alfaro-Astorima MI, Ormachea-Sánchez HH, Alvarado-Malca AE. Ovarian follicular dynamics of a creole cattle under grazing conditions in high Andean areas of Peru. Sci Agropecu 2020;11(4):621-628. doi: 10.17268/sci.agropecu.2020.04.18. [ Links ]

87. Carvalho JBP, Carvalho NAT, Reis EL, Nichi M, Souza AH, Baruselli PS. Effect of early luteolysis in progesterone-based timed AI protocols in Bos indicus, Bos indicus × Bos taurus, and Bos taurus heifers. Theriogenology (2008);69:167-175. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2007.08.035. [ Links ]

88. Sánchez-Arciniega C, Ramírez-Godínez JA, Domínguez-Díaz D, Corral-Flores G, Grado-Ahuir JA, Flores-Mariñelarena A, et al. Respuesta de vacas Criollas de Rodeo a la suplementación con selenio y propionato de calcio, y a la sincronización de la ovulación. Tecnociencia 2013;7(3):132-138. [ Links ]

89. Pérez-Hernández P, Becerril-Pérez M, Lamothe-Zavaletta C, Torres-Hernández G, López-Ortiz S, Gallegos-Sánchez J. Efecto del amamantamiento retrasado en la actividad posparto de las vacas y en los becerros de doble propósito. Interciencia 2006;31(10):748-752. [ Links ]

90. Montiel F, Ahuja C. Body condition and suckling as factors influencing the duration of postpartum anestrus in cattle: a review. Anim Reprod Sci 2005;85:1-26. doi:10.1016/j.anireprosci.2003.11.001. [ Links ]

91. Pérez-Hernández P, García-Winder M, Gallegos-Sánchez J. Postpartum anoestrus is reduced by increasing the within-day milking to suckling interval in dual purpose cows. Anim Reprod Sci 2002;73:159-168. doi: 10.1016/s0378-4320 (02) 00147-1. [ Links ]

92. Ruiz-Barrera O, Anchondo-Garay A, Flores-Mariñelarena A, Ríos-Ramírez G, Rodríguez-Almeida F, Castillo-Castillo Y. Destete precoz en ganado criollo mexicano de rodeo. Tecnociencia Chihuahua 2009;3(1):27-32. [ Links ]

93. Moreno-Flores LA, Macías-Coronel H, Martínez-Velázquez G, Guerrero-Bustamante JJ. Aspectos reproductivos del bovino Criollo Coreño y sus cruzas en el trópico. Abanico Vet 2012;2(1):32-40. [ Links ]

94. Espinoza-Villavicencio JL, López-Amador R, Palacios-Espinosa A, Ortega-Pérez R, Ávila-Serrano N, Murillo-Amador B. Efecto del toro sobre el comportamiento estral de vacas Chinampas (Bos taurus) en una región tropical seca. Zootecnia Trop 2007;25(1):19-28. [ Links ]

95. Rosendo-Ponce A, Rosales-Martínez F, Cruz-Reyes L, Canseco-Sedano R, Gallegos-Sánchez J, Becerril-Pérez CM. Sincronización de estro en vaquillas criollas Lechero Tropical puras y mestizas. Zootecnia Trop 2017;35:35-44. [ Links ]

96. Ayala LE, Pesantez JL, Rodas ER, Dután JB, Calle JR, Murillo YA, et al. Dinámica folicular de vaquillas Criollas al pastoreo en el altiplano ecuatoriano. Arch Zoot ec 2019;68(262):184-90. doi.org/10.21071/az.v68i262.4135. [ Links ]

97. Chasombat J, Nagai T, Parnpai R, Vongpralub T. Ovarian follicular dynamics and hormones throughout the estrous cycle in Thai native (Bos indicus) heifers. Anim Sci J 2013;85(1):15-24. doi:10.1111/asj.12086. [ Links ]

98. Cooke RF, Bohnert DW, Cappellozza BI, Mueller CJ, Delcurto T. Effects of temperament and acclimation to handling on reproductive performance of Bos taurus beef females. J Anim Sci 2012;90(10):3547-55. doi: 10.2527/jas.2011-4768. [ Links ]

99. Cooke RF, Moriel P, Cappellozza BI, Miranda VFB, Batista LFD, Colombo EA, et al. Effects of temperament on growth, plasma cortisol concentrations and puberty attainment in Nelore beef heifers. Animal 2019;13(6):1208-1213. doi:10.1017/S1751731118002628. [ Links ]

100. Kasimanickam R, Asay M, Schroeder S, Kasimanickam V, Gay JM, Kastelic JP, et al. Calm temperament improves reproductive performance of beef cows. Reprod Dom Anim 2014;49(6):1063-1067. doi: 10.1111/rda.12436. [ Links ]

101. Solano J, Galindo F, Orihuela A, Galina CS. The effect of social rank on the physiological response during repeated stressful handling in Zebu cattle (Bos indicus). Physiol Behav 2004;82(4):679-83. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2004.06.005. [ Links ]

Received: August 11, 2021; Accepted: January 03, 2022

Creative Commons License Este es un artículo publicado en acceso abierto bajo una licencia Creative Commons