SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.12 número4Relaciones entre estacionalidad, características corporales y leptina en el inicio de la pubertad en vaquillas Bos taurus taurus y Bos taurus indicus en el trópico mexicanoEnsilado de orujo de uva (Vitis labrusca L. cv. Isabel) en la digestibilidad de nutrientes, balance de nitrógeno y comportamiento ingestivo de corderos índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Revista mexicana de ciencias pecuarias

versión On-line ISSN 2448-6698versión impresa ISSN 2007-1124

Rev. mex. de cienc. pecuarias vol.12 no.4 Mérida oct./dic. 2021  Epub 06-Jun-2022

https://doi.org/10.22319/rmcp.v12i4.5294 

Articles

Brachiaria grasses in vitro digestibility with bovine and ovine ruminal liquid as inoculum

Luis Carlos Vinhas Itavoa  * 

Camila Celeste Brandão Ferreira Ítavoa 

Cacilda Borges do Valleb 

Alexandre Menezes Diasa 

Gelson dos Santos Difantea 

Maria da Graça Moraisa 

Claudia Muniz Soaresa 

Camila da Silva Pereiraa 

Ronaldo Lopes Oliveirac 

a Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science. Av. Senador Filinto Muller, 2443. Vila Ipiranga. CEP 79070-900 Campo Grande, MS, Brazil.

b Brazilian Corporation of Agricultural Research - Embrapa Beef Cattle. Campo Grande, MS. 79106-550, Brazil.

c Federal University of Bahia, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine. Salvador, BA 40170110, Brazil.


Abstract

It was hypothesized that it is possible that inoculum from different ruminant species with different digestive abilities feeding from a certain forage may show different feed utilizations comparing to other ruminant species. Five Brachiaria grasses were evaluated: B. decumbens cv. Basilisk, B. decumbens access D70, B. humidicola cv. Tupi, B. humidicola cv. Common, and B. ruziziensis access R124, at two regrowth ages (21 and 42 d). Production, bromatological content, in vitro dry matter digestibility (ivDMD) and in vitro neutral detergent fiber digestibility (ivNDFD) were analyzed using bovine or ovine inoculums. The experiment used a 5 × 2 × 2 factorial design and found significant effects for grass variety and regrowth age. In addition, significant interactions from grass × age on dry matter, crude protein, neutral detergent fiber and acid detergent fiber of total sample and leaf blade were found. There were significant effect of grass variety and grass age on forage mass, leaf blade/stem ratio, leaf blade, stem, senescent material and growth. In vitro digestibility assays of inoculum source showed significant effect in some varieties. Due to differences in in vitro assays, it was recommended the use of species-specific inoculums for feed evaluations according to the animal it is intended for. Also, B. decumbens cv. Basilisk presented the best in vitro digestibility (ivDMD and ivNDFD) in bovine inoculum, whereas B. humidicola cv. Tupi had better in vitro digestibility (ivDMD and ivNDFD) in ovine inoculum.

Key words Brachiaria decumbens; Brachiaria humidicola; Brachiaria ruziziensis; digestibility; Rumen inoculum

Resumen

Se planteó la hipótesis de que es posible que el inóculo de diferentes especies de rumiantes con capacidades digestivas diferentes que se alimentan de un determinado forraje puede mostrar diferentes utilizaciones de alimento en comparación con otras especies de rumiantes. Se evaluaron cinco gramíneas Brachiaria: B. decumbens cv. Basilisk, B. decumbens acceso D70, B. humidicola cv. Tupi, B. humidicola cv. Común, y B. ruziziensis acceso R124, en dos edades de rebrote (21 y 42 d). Se analizó la producción, el contenido bromatológico, la digestibilidad de materia seca in vitro (DMSiv) y la digestibilidad de la fibra detergente neutro in vitro (DFDNiv) utilizando inóculos bovinos u ovinos. El experimento utilizó un diseño factorial de 5 × 2 × 2 y encontró efectos significativos para la variedad de gramínea y la edad de rebrote. Además, se encontraron interacciones significativas de gramínea × edad en la materia seca, la proteína cruda, la fibra detergente neutro y la fibra detergente ácido de la muestra total y lamina de la hoja. Hubo un efecto significativo de la variedad de gramínea y la edad de la gramínea en la masa del forraje, la relación lámina de la hoja/tallo, lámina de la hoja, tallo, material senescente y crecimiento. En los ensayos de la digestibilidad in vitro, el origen del inóculo mostró un efecto significativo en algunas variedades. Debido a las diferencias en los ensayos in vitro, se recomendó el uso de inóculos específicos de las especies para las evaluaciones de alimentos según el animal al que se destina. Asimismo, B. decumbens cv. Basilisk presentó la mejor digestibilidad in vitro (DMSiv y DFDNiv) en inóculo bovino, mientras que B. humidicola cv. Tupi tuvo mejor digestibilidad in vitro (DMSiv y DFDNiv) en inóculo ovino.

Palabras clave Brachiaria decumbens; Brachiaria humidicola; Brachiaria ruziziensis; Digestibilidad; Inóculo ruminal

Introduction

Brachiaria grasses are important because they enable ruminant production in acid soils of low fertility1. This genus, mainly from tropical and subtropical Africa, is comprised of approximately 100 species, including B. decumbens, B. humidicola and B. ruziziensis, which are widely used as forage sources in tropical America.

The evaluation and subsequent recommendation of a specific forage is determined by its ability to support grazing by certain animals of different species or categories and its nutritional value. One of the methods from which its nutritional value that can be inferred is to submit it to in vitro digestibility testing. In vitro is an alternative to in vivo and in situ techniques2, requiring fewer animals, reducing costs and is a reliable method to evaluate feedstuff digestibility.

Nutrient components are closely correlated with the digestibility of forages3. Through bromatological analysis, it is possible to estimate nutrient components of forages, as well as the cellular content and structural components. These components include crude protein (CP), soluble content and neutral detergent fiber (NDF).

The in vitro digestibility technique has been widely used in the analysis of different types of feedstuffs provided to ruminants. However, it can be affected by the inoculum source, as well as the previous diet from the donor animal, the fasting time of animal before sampling, and occasionally by flaws in the execution of the technique4.

It is possible that different ruminant species show different digestibility, and when being fed a certain forage they may show better-feed utilization than other ruminant species. Therefore, the aim of this research was to evaluate five Brachiaria grasses of two regrowth ages, submitted to in vitro digestibility assay using two different inoculums (bovine and ovine).

Material and methods

Ethical considerations

This study was carried out in strict accordance with the recommendations of the Guide for the National Council for Animal Experiments Control of Brazil. The experiment was approved by the Committee on Ethics of Animal Experiments of the Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Mato Grosso do Sul State, Brazil (Protocol Number: 367/2011).

Location and experimental field of Brachiaria spp. cultivars

This study was carried out at the Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul in partnership with the Biotechnology Laboratory Applied to Animal Nutrition at Dom Bosco Catholic University and Embrapa Beef Cattle. Brachiaria grasses were evaluated in experimental plots at Embrapa Beef Cattle (latitude 20°27'S, longitude 54°37'W and 530 m altitude, located in Campo Grande, MS, Brazil). The type of soil in the study area was Dystrophic Purple Latosol alic.

The climate according to Köppen & Geiger5 classification is rainy tropical, AW subtype, characterized by a well-defined occurrence of a dry period during the colder months of the year (April-September) and a rainy season during the summer months (October-March) with an average annual rainfall of 1,469 mm and an average annual temperature of 23 °C.

Forages were evaluated during two consecutive summers (December-February), which is the rainy season in the Brazilian Cerrado, due to the seasonality of the forages. The experimental area consisted of 20 plots (experimental units, four plots/cultivar), measuring 4.0 × 4.0 m (16 m2). The plots were cut at 5 cm above the ground in order to standardize them for evaluation.

Five cultivars of Brachiaria grasses were evaluated in each plot: B. decumbens cv. Basilisk; B. decumbens access D70; B. humidicola cv. Tupi; B. humidicola cv. Common and B. ruziziensis access R124. Each plot was divided into two parts, to be cut with 21 and 42 d of regrowth. Forage samples were collected by cutting at 5 cm from the ground inside a square 0.5 × 0.5 m (0.25 m2) and sampled with five repetitions from the four plots of each cultivar, obtaining a composite sample from each forage.

Forage mass and growth determination

After forages were sampled, each was wrapped in a plastic bag and identified. In the laboratory they were weighed and divided into two parts: one to be processed as total sample and the other separated into leaf blade, stem and dead material6. Forage mass was estimated by the square method, with the quantification of forage, on a dry matter basis, sampled inside the 0.5 × 0.5 m square converted to metric ton (1,000 kg) per hectare (t ha-1).

The leaf blade/stem ratio was obtained by dividing the mass of the leaf blades by the mass of the stems7. The vegetative canopy growth was determined at six different points in each experimental unit, which were marked for measurement according to the different growth ages evaluated7.

Forage chemical composition

After sampling and separating into total sample, leaf blade, stem and dead material, materials were pre-dried at 55°C for 72 h and ground to 1 mm with a Wiley Mill (Tecnal, Piracicaba City, São Paulo, Brazil) then stored in hermetic plastic containers (ASS, Ribeirão Preto City, São Paulo, Brazil) until analysis. Dry matter (DM) content (Method 967.03, AOAC8) and CP content (Method 981.10, AOAC8) were determined. For the determination of the NDF and acid detergent fiber (ADF) content, the methodology of Van Soest et al3 was used with modifications proposed in the ANKOM device manual (ANKOM Technology Corporation, Macedon, New York, USA).

In vitro dry matter digestibility (ivDMD) and in vitro neutral detergent fiber digestibility (ivNDFD)

The total samples (all canopy structures) of the different varieties of Brachiaria grasses of two regrowth ages (21 and 42 d) were submitted to in vitro tests, incubated with bovine or ovine rumen liquid (inoculum). The bovine inoculum was collected from three Nellore × Angus crossbred cattle and the ovine inoculum from five Dorper × Suffolk crossbred sheep, already fitted with ruminal silicon cannula and adapted to forage diet.

The in vitro digestibility of nutrients was determined according to the methodology of Tilley and Terry9 adapted for the ANKOM Daisy system (ANKOM Technology Corp., Macedon, NY, USA) as described by Holden10. Bags of non-woven fabric containing samples of Brachiaria grasses were placed on jars (with a limit of 30 bags per jar, two of them blanks) containing approximately 1.6 L of buffer solution11. Bovine or ovine ruminal liquid (400 ml) was then added and purged CO2 in the jars. The jars remained incubated with shaking at a constant temperature of 39 °C for 48 h, after which 40 ml of HCl (6 N) and 8 g of pepsin were added to each jar and left for another 24 h. When the incubation was finished, the jars were drained and the bags washed with distilled water and dried at 105 ºC for 16 h. They were then weighed to determine the post-incubation DM and submitted to NDF analysis3 with adaptation of ANKOM device manual (ANKOM Technology Corp., Macedon, NY, USA). The in vitro digestibility (ivD) coefficients for DM (ivDMD) and NDF (ivNDFD) were obtained through the equation:

ivD (g/kg) = [(incubated nutrient, g) - (residual nutrient, g - blank, g)] / (incubated nutrient, g) × 1,000.

Statistical analysis

All data were analyzed using the statistical package SAS® (SAS® Inst. Inc., Cary, NC, USA), and the means were compared using Tukey’s test with a significance level of P<0.05, and tendency considered at P<0.10.

To evaluate bromatological composition, production and regrowth of grasses, the following statistical model was used:

Yijkl = µ + Ai + Gj + AGk + eijkl

= µ + Ai + Gj + AGk + eijkl

where

µ is the general average,

Ii is the effect of the i-th age (21, 42), Gj is the effect of the j-th grass (1,…, 5),

IGk is the effect of interaction of i-th age with j-th grass,

eijkl is the random error.

To compare the values of ivD of DM and NDF carried out with different inoculums, the following statistical model was used:

Yijkl = µ + Ii + Gj + IGk + eijkl

= µ + Ii + Gj + IGk + eijkl

where

µ is the general average,

Ii is the effect of the i-th rumen inoculum (1, 2),

Gj is the effect of the j-th cultivar (1,…, 5),

IGk is the effect of interaction of i-th rumen inoculum with j-th cultivar,

eijkl is the random error.

Results

Forage mass and growth determination

The forage mass and growth parameters are presented in Table 1. There was a significant effect (P<0.05) on forage mass from variety and age, leaf blade/stem ratio, leaf blade, stem, senescent material and growth. In addition, there was significant grass × age interaction (P≤0.0001) for all variables. The variety that presented the highest forage mass at 21 d was B. humidicola cv. Common, and at 42 d it was B. ruziziensis access R124 (8.86 and 12.81 g kg-1, respectively; P=0.0001).

Table 1 Forage mass, leaf blade/stem ratio (LB:S), stem, Senescent material and growth of different varieties of Brachiaria grasses at different cutting ages 

B. decumbens
cv. Basilisk
B. decumbens
access D70
B. humidicola
cv. Common
B. humidicola
cv. Tupi
B. ruziziensis
access R124
CV
(%)
P-value
21 d 42 d 21 d 42 d 21 d 42 d 21 d 42 d 21 d 42 d Grass Age G×A
Mass, t ha-1 6.18 4.58 6.13 5.75 8.86 8.21 7.69 5.21 7.31 12.81 36.54 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001
LB:S ratio 0.81 1.21 1.11 1.51 0.51 0.30 1.21 1.11 0.91 1.01 24.31 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001
Leaf blade, g kg-1 238.1 364.9 319.3 198.4 238.5 131.1 409.7 406.5 306.3 215.0 21.32 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001
Stem, g kg-1 270.4 294.3 303.3 125.0 448.8 656.8 343.9 325.6 334.4 212.3 29.17 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001
Senescent, g kg-1 389.0 449.8 385.7 684.8 220.2 321.3 254.7 276.3 367.6 581.1 25.58 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001
Growth, cm 20.7 24.2 15.1 17.1 11.6 18.2 12.1 14.1 20.7 28.2 25.90 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001

CV = Coefficients of variation (%).

A lower leaf blade/stem ratio was observed in B. humidicola cv. Common at 21 and 42 d (0.51 and 0.30, respectively; P=0.0001) with similarity among the other grasses. However, the highest leaf blade/stem ratio at 21 d was observed in B. humidicola cv. Tupi (1.21 ratio; P=0.0001), whereas U. decumbens access D70 presented the highest ratio at 42 days of regrowth (1.51; P=0.0001). For stem results, B. humidicola cv. Common had significantly high values at 21 and 42 d of age (448.8 and 656.8 g kg-1, respectively; P=0.0001).

In the production of senescent material in the studied varieties, the highest amount was observed for B. decumbens access D70 with 42 d of regrowth (684.8 g kg-1; P=0.0001), and at 21 d B. decumbens cv Basilisk had numerically the highest value, close to B. decumbens access D70 (389.0 and 385.7 g kg-1, respectively). In contrast, B. humidicola cv. Common and B. humidicola cv. Tupi had numerically the lowest senescent material at 21 d (220.2 and 276.3 g kg-1, respectively).

The growth parameter was significant (P=0.00001) with highest growth shown by B. ruziziensis access R124 at 42 d (28.2 cm) and the lowest by B. humidicola cv. Common at 21d (11.6 cm).

Forage chemical composition

In relation to chemical composition, there was significant effect (P<0.05) from variety of grass and growth age on DM, CP, NDF and ADF in all sample types (total sample, leaf blade and stem; Table 2). Also, there was a significant grass × age interaction (P<0.05) for DM, CP, NDF and ADF in all samples, except DM and NDF from stem material, which showed no significant interaction (P>0.05), but a trend for NDF (P= 0.0985).

Table 2 Chemical composition of the total plant, leaf blade and steam samples of different Brachiaria grasses at different regrowth ages 

B. decumbens
cv. Basilisk
B. decumbens
access D70
B. humidicola
cv. Common
B. humidicola
cv. Tupi
B. ruziziensis
access R124
CV (%) P-value
21 d 42 d 21 d 42 d 21 d 42 d 21 d 42 d 21 d 42 d Grass Age P G×A
Total plant
TDM 299.1 480.6 324.7 398.4 444.3 564.6 402.9 433.2 398.3 424.8 0.19 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001
OM 941.2 925.9 940.4 922.7 943.6 907.2 939.3 902.7 929.9 922.5 0.29 0.9431 0.0347 0.8609
CP 59.8 47.53 67.8 54.9 49.4 42.6 47.2 31.3 58.3 61.9 9.01 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001
NDF 676.3 743.8 702.3 798.0 669.3 772.5 701.9 769.4 572.8 710.4 9.20 0.0001 0.0001 0.0465
ADF 437.0 498.4 483.8 541.5 505.8 510.8 497.5 557.7 425.5 542.9 3.29 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001
Leaf blade
DM 378.9 416.7 392.7 497.3 422.8 518.3 388.8 460.1 425.8 489.0 0.332 0.0001 0.0001 0.0009
OM 924.5 899.5 926.7 896.6 919.0 883.0 921.6 886.4 945.7 885.0 0.26 0.8885 0.0007 0.8312
CP 102.3 93.7 138.9 104.9 80.2 39.6 62.2 49.5 117.3 144.2 16.02 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001
NDF 513.0 608.0 600.0 668.4 580.3 624.3 726.9 810.9 652.2 700.7 3.71 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001
ADF 305.1 367.6 288.8 298.9 290.8 303.4 307.0 384.7 357.5 351.9 4.95 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001
Stem samples
DM 353.4 402.8 421.0 464.1 383.8 449.1 336.1 415.8 406.2 463.0 0.33 0.0001 0.0001 0.1240
OM 934.1 924.7 931.5 926.2 948.0 934.9 939.0 932.0 924.7 921.4 0.34 0.8324 0.4687 0.9986
CP 37.6 36.9 55.5 44.6 31.3 48.7 31.2 31.7 50.1 49.5 5.08 0.0001 0.0214 0.0001
NDF 798.2 804.1 766.9 788.5 821.3 811.9 822.4 884.6 774.4 821.99 1.32 0.0001 0.0074 0.0985
ADF 463.0 457.1 412.9 442.7 445.3 442.1 432.1 476.7 484.4 486.1 2.69 0.0001 0.0119 0.0089

CV= Coefficients of variation (%).

Comparing regrowth ages of total sample, forages at 21 d of regrowth showed lower values of DM, NDF and ADF (P<0.05); however, they presented higher CP values. As expected, CP from leaf blades was higher than from stem samples. The CP of leaf blades of B. ruziziensis R124 at 42 d of regrowth showed the highest amount (144.2 g kg-1; P<0.05)

B. humidicola cv. Tupi presented higher NDF and ADF values for leaf blades at 42 d of regrowth (769.4 and 557.7 g kg-1, respectively; P<0.05). The highest stem NDF values were also presented by B. humidicola cv. Tupi (884.6 g kg-1; P<0.05). High ADF values were also observed for B. humidicola cv. Tupi and B. decumbens cv. Basilisk (384.7 and 367.6 g kg-1, respectively; P<0.05).

In vitro dry matter digestibility (ivDMD) and in vitro neutral detergent fiber digestibility (ivNDFD)

There was no significant interaction (P>0.05) between inoculum and grasses. It was observed that ovine inoculum vs bovine inoculum resulted in higher ivDMD values for B. decumbens cv. Basilisk at 21 d (611.2 vs 571.9 g kg-1; P=0.0200), B. humidicola cv. Tupi at 21 d (631.8 vs 568.4 g kg-1; P=0.0370), and B. ruziziensis access R124 at 21 d (548.8 vs 613.4 g kg-1; P=0.0420; Table 3). When evaluating only bovine inoculum, B. humidicola cv. Tupi and B. ruziziensis access R124 at 42 d of regrowth showed the lowest ivDMD values (544.3 and 542.0 g kg-1, respectively; P=0.0078). When evaluating only ovine inoculum, B. ruziziensis access R124 at 42 d also presented the lowest ivDMD (535.0 g kg-1; P=0.0184).

Table 3 In vitro dry matter digestibly (ivDMD) of different varieties of Brachiaria grasses at different regrowth ages incubated with bovine or ovine rumen liquid (g kg-1

Age Rumen inoculum CV
(%)
P-value
Bovine Ovine
B. decumbens cv. Basilisk 21 571.9 ABb 611.2 ABa 0.96 0.0200
42 612.9 AB 575.5 ABC 1.48 0.0520
B. decumbens access D70 21 583.4 AB 599.2 AB 2.85 0.1235
42 558.6 BC 550.7 BC 2.12 0.1354
B. humidicola cv. Common 21 515.9 B 574.3 B 2.86 0.0650
42 593.2 ABC 598.8 AB 1.30 0.1845
B. humidicola cv. Tupi 21 568.4 ABb 631.8 ABa 2.09 0.0370
42 544.3 C 577.6 ABC 1.81 0.0820
B. ruziziensis access R124 21 548.8 ABb 613.4 ABa 3.30 0.0420
42 542.0 C 535.0 C 0.07 0.2002
CV, % 2.564 1.972
P-value 0.0078 0.0184

Mean values with different capital letters in the same column or lowercase letters superscript differ (P<0.05) based on Tukey’s test.

CV= Coefficients of variation.

Regarding the ivNDFD, as presented on Table 4, ovine resulted in higher values than bovine inoculum on B. humidicola cv. Common at 21 d of regrowth (420.3 vs 369.5 g kg-1; P=0.0040), and B. humidicola cv. Tupi at 42 d (490.8 vs 452.4 g kg-1; P=0.0270). However, on B. decumbens cv. Basilisk at 42 d, the opposite was seen: ovine inoculum resulted in lower ivNDFD values than bovine (413.9 vs 472.4 g kg-1; P=0.0150).

Table 4 In vitro neutral detergent fiber digestibility (ivNDFD) of different varieties of Brachiaria grasses at different regrowth ages incubated with bovine or ovine rumen liquid (g kg-1

Age Rumen inoculum CV(%) P-value
Bovine Ovine
B. decumbens cv. Basilisk 21 436.8 A 439.1 9.75 0.3542
42 472.4 Aa 413.9 b 1.64 0.0150
B. decumbens access D70 21 482.7 A 487.7 5.76 0.1423
42 445.7 A 412.5 4.87 0.2540
B. humidicola cv. Common 21 369.5 ABb 420.3 a 0.84 0.0040
42 443.4 A 458.7 1.30 0.1210
B. humidicola cv. Tupi 21 458.4 A 510.3 3.62 0.0970
42 452.4 Ab 490.8a 1.35 0.0270
B. ruziziensis access R124 21 212.2 B 455.7 70.20 0.4080
42 427.6 A 424.0 15.53 0.0870
CV, % 25.333 4.622
P-value 0.0044 0.1562

Mean values with different capital letters in the same column or lowercase letters superscript differ (P<0.05) based on Tukey’s test.

CV= Coefficients of variation.

There was no effect (P>0.05) on ivNDFD from cultivar and regrowth age when the samples were incubated with ovine inoculum; however, the highest values were observed for B. humidicola cv. Tupi at 21 and 42 d (510.3 and 490.8 g kg-1, respectively). When using bovine inoculum only the variety B. ruziziensis access R124 at 21 d presented ivNDFD values below the others (P=0.0044). At 21 d of regrowth the varieties that presented the higher values (P=0.0044) were B. decumbens cv. Basilisk, B. decumbens access D70, B. humidicola cv. Common and B. humidicola cv Tupi, B. decumbens access D70 being highlighted numerically, with the highest mean value. At 42 d B. decumbens cv. Basilisk, B. decumbens access D70, B. humidicola cv. Common, B. humidicola cv. Tupi and B. ruziziensis access R124 had statistically the highest values (P=0.0044), highlighting B. decumbens cv. Basilisk numerically with the highest mean.

Discussion

The stoloniferous habit of B. humidicola, with strong nodes branching into new plants, favors a high residue during the standard cut of forage for regrowth evaluation12. The large root system results in more carbohydrate reserves for more vigorous regrowth, as observed at this study in the higher weight of leaf blade in B. humidicola cv. Tupi and stems in B. humidicola cv. Common (Table 1). It is possible that higher regrowth of leaves is due to the intense turnover of nutrients and an increase in CP in young leaves related to a thinner cell wall13. However, high stem development in tropical grasses is also due to two other main factors: the low frequency of defoliation and flowering14. In response to a need to expose the younger leaves to the upper canopy, where light is most abundant, a competition for light may occur between the tillers forcing them to elongate their stems15,16.

B. humidicola grasses presented less senescence material (Table 1), favoring the positive assessment of green leaves, which are of great importance in the nutritional value of a forage. The leaf blades of B. humidicola cultivars are morphologically thinner (0.5-0.8 cm width) than those of B. decumbens (average 1.5 cm width) and B. ruziziensis (1.0-1.5 cm width), providing less shade (less than 65 %). Therefore, they have lower senescence and/or death of the young tillers and old leaves, as previous reported in other studies6,16,17. The expanding leaf blades, especially those intermediate in the tiller, run a higher path between their connection point with the meristematic region and the end of pseudo-stems and, consequently, reach full size6. Comparing the ages of regrowth, the sampling dates did not affect significantly the vegetative growth (Table 1).

Regarding forage production, it is possible to suggest that B. humidicola cv. Tupi showed the best performance, despite B. decumbens cv. Basilisk having an increased production of leaf blade, stem and senescent material but fewer leaf blades and higher senescent material than the others (P<0.05), which may interfere with nutrient content.

Assessing chemical compositions of B. decumbens grasses, this study presented higher CP content at 21 d of regrowth, but at 42 d B. ruziziensis had high CP content (Table 2). Findings of a study18 evaluating B. decumbens cv. Basilisk and B. ruziziensis cv. Kennedy reported higher CP content, but this may have been due to a different cutting height (10 cm vs 5 cm); when cutting closer to the ground more stem and senescent material may be present in the samples,- but, may also have been due to differences of soil fertility, and others edaphoclimatic conditions where plants were grown.

Concerning the fibrous portion of the material, due to NDF consisting of cellulose, hemicellulose, lignin and silica and ADF being the fraction composed of cellulose, lignin and silica, even a slight change in those compounds will alter the NDF and ADF values19. The NDF and ADF of the total sample from B. decumbens varieties found in this study were lower than observed in another study20, which quoted values at 30 d of regrowth of 832.4 g kg-1 NDF and 462.1 g kg-1 ADF. A study with Brachiaria decumbens13 obtained mean of 809.0 g kg-1 NDF and 475.0 g kg-1 ADF. These results are closer to our findings with the two B. decumbens varieties at 42 d of regrowth (B. decumbens cv Basilisk 743.8 g kg-1 NDF and 498.4 g kg-1 ADF; B. decumbens access D70 798.0 g kg-1 NDF and 541.5 g kg-1 ADF; Table 2). Plants with fewer structural carbohydrates (waste FDA) are more efficient at nutrient cycling and have beneficial effects on crop yields21.

Taking all bromatological composition parameters into account, at 21 d of regrowth B. ruziziensis access R124 showed the best combination of parameters, with less NDF and ADF (P<0.05) and one of highest values of CP content. However, at 42 d, the variety that had the best bromatological content combination was B. decumbens cv. Basilisk; even with not such a high CP value, it had lower ADF and NDF content and a lower proportion of ADF inside the NDF, which interferes directly with the digestion of a feedstuff and consequently its nutritional value.

In vitro digestibility techniques using ovine and bovine inoculums have advantages for a rapid evaluation of feedstuffs, such as the physical and chemical uniformity of the fermentative containers and the convenience of keeping fewer fistulated animals; although they do not perfectly reproduce the process of digestion as do live animals. This could be observed when we compared the results from this study with others that analyzed the same forage in situ or in vivo12,22,23,24. Furthermore, the ovine ruminal digestibility presented percentages that were 10 to 15 % higher than bovine ruminal fluid (Table 3). However, the prediction ability and applicability of in vitro techniques can depend on the degree of similarity between the technical and ruminant digestive process. In vitro systems use rumen fluid and a standard solution to simulate the anaerobic process of ruminal fermentation25; the standard solution is typically a buffer solution simulating the saliva of ruminants11.

All grasses presented values higher than the 500 g kg-1 ivDMD, indicated by authors26 to be a minimum value to qualify them as forage of good nutritional quality and to not compromise animal performance, even given the expected drop in microbial colonization of 0.1 to 0.2 % per day with the increase in the physiological age of the plant13. As expected, the mean ivNDFD was lower than that of ivDMD (Tables 3 and 4). However, finding no significant difference (P>0.05) between regrowth ages in a few Brachiaria variety contradicts the results of Paciullo et al27, who found that with the development of the plant during the rest period, metabolites arise from photosynthesis and are converted into structural components. Solubilization of hemicellulose may occur, expansion of the fiber possibly increasing the availability of fermentable substrates, thereby providing suitable conditions for microbial growth and consequently NDF digestibility. The reduction of intermolecular hydrogen bonds and the type of ester bond between the lignin and hemicellulose allows for its release and exposure to attack by rumen bacteria, aside from the possible presence of elevated, readily fermentable carbohydrate content19.

Finally, when analyzing the results of ivDMD and ivNDFD and considering the two inoculums, it was possible to observe that in bovine inoculum B. decumbens cv. Basilisk presented the best digestibility at both regrowth ages, while in ovine inoculum B. humidicola cv. Tupi had the best digestibility, also for both ages.

Conclusions and implications

The source animal species for inoculum has an effect on in vitro digestibility tests. Therefore, is highly recommended to use a specific inoculum for grass evaluations according to the target species (cattle or sheep). From the obtained results, B. decumbens cv. Basilisk presented the best in vitro digestibility (ivDMD and ivNDFD) in bovine inoculum and also a good combination of nutrient content and increasing production of all its canopy components, whereas B. humidicola cv. Tupi had better in vitro digestibility (ivDMD and ivNDFD) in ovine inoculum and the best production.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico - CNPq, (process n° 563988/2010-0); Fundação de Apoio ao Desenvolvimento do Ensino, Ciência e Tecnologia do Estado de Mato Grosso do Sul - FUNDECT (process 23/200.145/2011), and Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior -CAPES (Financing Code 001). They also wish to thank the Brazilian Agricultural Research Center (Embrapa Beef Cattle) for providing the forages.

Literature cited

1. Fernandes LO, Reis RA, Paes JMV, Teixeira RMA, Queiroz DS, Paschoal JJ. Performance of Gir young bull maintained in" Brachiaria brizantha" pastures submitted to different management. Rev Bras Saúde e Produção Anim 2015;16(1):36-46. [ Links ]

2. Medeiros FF, Silva AMA, Carneiro H, Araújo DRC, Morais RKO, Moreira MN, et al. Fontes proteicas alternativas oriundas da cadeia produtiva do biodiesel para alimentação de ruminantes. Arq Bras Med Veterinária e Zootec 2015;67(2):519-526. [ Links ]

3. Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci 1991;74(10):3583-3597. [ Links ]

4. Weiss WP. Estimation of digestibility of forages by laboratory methods. Forage Qual. Eval. Util. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 1994:644-681. [ Links ]

5. Köppen W, Geiger R. Handbuch der Klimatologie: Das geographische System der Klimate. Berlin: Borntraeger Science Publishers; 1936 vol. 35. [ Links ]

6. Machado LAZ, Fabrício AC, Assis PGG de, Maraschin GE. Estrutura do dossel em pastagens de capim-marandu submetidas a quatro ofertas de lâminas foliares. Pesqui Agropecuária Bras 2007;42(10):1495-1501. [ Links ]

7. Santos MER, da Fonseca DM, Silva GP, Pimentel RM, de Carvalho VV, da Silva SP. Estrutura do pasto de capim-braquiária com variação de alturas. Rev Bras Zootec 2010;39(10):2125-2131. [ Links ]

8. AOAC (Association of Official Analytical Chemists). Official Methods of Analysis 1990;1(Vol 1):552. [ Links ]

9. Tilley JMA, Terry RA. A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. Grass Forage Sci 1963;18(2):104-111. [ Links ]

10. Holden LA. Comparison of methods of in vitro dry matter digestibility for ten feeds. J Dairy Sci 1999;82(8):1791-1804. [ Links ]

11. McDougall EI. Studies on ruminant saliva. 1. The composition and output of sheep’s saliva. Biochem J 1948;43(1):99-109. [ Links ]

12. Zorzi K, Detmann E, Queiroz AC de, Paulino MF, Mantovani HC, Bayão GF. In vitro degradation of neutral detergent fiber of high-quality tropical forage according to supplementation with different nitrogenous compounds. Rev Bras Zootec 2009;38(5):964-971. [ Links ]

13. Santos EDG, Paulino MF, Queiroz DS, Valadares Filho S de C, Fonseca DM da, Lana R de P. Avaliação de pastagem diferida de Brachiaria decumbens Stapf: 1. Características químico-bromatológicas da forragem durante a seca. Rev Bras Zootec 2004;33(1):203-213. [ Links ]

14. Barbosa RA, Nascimento Júnior D do, Euclides VPB, Silva SC da, Zimmer AH, Torres Júnior RA de A. Capim-tanzânia submetido a combinações entre intensidade e freqüência de pastejo. Pesqui Agropecuária Bras 2007;42(3):329-340. [ Links ]

15. Velásquez PAT, Berchielli TT, Reis RA, Rivera AR, Dian PHM, Teixeira IAMDA. Composição química, fracionamento de carboidratos e proteínas e digestibilidade in vitro de forrageiras tropicais em diferentes idades de corte. Rev Bras Zootec 2010;39(6):1206-1213. [ Links ]

16. Santos MER, Fonseca DM da, Euclides VPB, Nascimento Júnior D do, Queiroz AC de, Ribeiro Júnior JI. Características estruturais e índice de tombamento de Brachiaria decumbens cv. Basilisk em pastagens diferidas. Rev Bras Zootec 2009;38(4):626-634. [ Links ]

17. Paciullo DSC, De Carvalho CAB, Aroeira LJM, Morenz MJF, Lopes FCF, Rossiello ROP. Morphophysiology and nutritive value of signalgrass under natural shading and full sunlight. Pesqui Agropecu Bras 2007;42(4):573-579. [ Links ]

18. Moreira EA, Souza SM de, Ferreira AL, Tomich TR, Azevêdo JAG, Souza Sobrinho F de, et al. Nutritional diversity of Brachiaria ruziziensis clones. Ciência Rural 2018;48(2):1-8. [ Links ]

19. Rosa B, Reis RA, De Resende KT, Do Nascimento Kronka S, Jobim CC. Nutritive value of Brachiaria decumbens stapf cv. Basilisk hay submitted to anhydrous ammonia or urea treatment. Rev Bras Zootec 1998;27(4):815-822. [ Links ]

20. Moraes EHBK de, Paulino MF, Zervoudakis JT, Valadares Filho S de C, Moraes KAK de. Avaliação qualitativa da pastagem diferida de Brachiaria decumbens Stapf., sob pastejo, no período da seca, por intermédio de três métodos de amostragem. Rev Bras Zootec 2005;34(1):30-35. [ Links ]

21. Silva AM, Oliveira RL, Ribeiro OL, Bagaldo AR, Bezerra LR, Carvalho ST, et al. Valor nutricional de resíduos da agroindústria para alimentação de ruminantes. Comun Sci 2014;5(4):370-379. [ Links ]

22. Rodrigues ALP, Sampaio IBM, Carneiro JC, Tomich TR, Martins RGR. Degradabilidade in situ da matéria seca de forrageiras tropicais obtidas em diferentes épocas de corte. Arq Bras Med Veterinária e Zootec 2004;56(5):658-664. [ Links ]

23. Costa VAC, Detmann E, Valadares Filho SDC, Paulino MF, Henriques LT, Mantovani HC. Degradação in vitro da fibra em detergente neutro de forragem tropical de baixa qualidade em função de suplementação com proteína e/ou carboidratos. Rev Bras Zootec 2008;37(3):494-503. [ Links ]

24. Mutimura M, Ebong C, Rao IM, Nsahlai IV. Nutritional values of available ruminant feed resources in smallholder dairy farms in Rwanda. Trop Anim Health Prod 2015;47(6):1131-1137. [ Links ]

25. Goering HK, Van Soest PJ. Forage fiber analyses: apparatus, reagents, procedures, and some applications. Agr Res Serv. US Department of Agriculture; 1970. [ Links ]

26. Euclides VPB, Flores R, Medeiros RN, Oliveira MP de. Diferimento de pastos de braquiária cultivares Basilisk e Marandu, na região do Cerrado. Pesqui Agropecuária Bras 2007;42(2):273-280. [ Links ]

27. Paciullo DSC, Gomide JA, Queiroz DS, Silva EAM da. Chemical composition and in vitro digestibility of leaf blades and stems of forages grasses, according to level of insertion on grass tiller, age and season of growth. Rev Bras Zootec 2001;30(3):964-74. [ Links ]

Received: March 16, 2019; Accepted: February 22, 2021

*Corresponding author: luis.itavo@ufms.br

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License