SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.11 número1Impacto del estrés por calor en la producción de ovinos de pelo. RevisiónEfecto del manejo del suelo y espaciamiento de siembra en el establecimiento de la mezcla de pasto-estrella-púrpura (Cynodon nlemfuensis cv. BRS Lua) y maní forrajero (Arachis pintoi cv. Belmonte) en área degradada de Brachiaria brizantha índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Revista mexicana de ciencias pecuarias

versión On-line ISSN 2448-6698versión impresa ISSN 2007-1124

Rev. mex. de cienc. pecuarias vol.11 no.1 Mérida ene./mar. 2020  Epub 11-Jun-2020

https://doi.org/10.22319/rmcp.v11i1.4951 

Review

Azospirillum spp. in grasses and forages. Review

Camila Fernandes Domingues Duartea  * 

Ulysses Cecatoa 

Thiago Trento Biserraa 

Divaney Mamédioa 

Sandra Galbeirob 

a Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Zootecnia, Departamento de Zootecnia, Av. Colombo, 5790 - Zona 7, Maringá, Paraná, Brasil.

b Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Centro de Ciências Agrárias , Londrina, Paraná, Brasil.


Abstract

The Azospirillum genus includes plant growth-promoting bacteria found in different soil regions worldwide. When associated with plant roots these bacteria help augment productivity by increasing both the aerial and root portions. These benefits derive from excretion of growth phytonutrients, especially auxins. Use of Azospirillum spp. can help to bridge the gap between productivity and sustainability since inoculants based on this microorganism can reduce use of nitrogen fertilizers without affecting productivity, and generate savings and greater profitability. Inoculation of Azospirillum spp. strains with forage grasses can result in greater forage mass gains and less need for nitrogen fertilizer, improving pasture production system sustainability. Co-inoculation with other strains such as Bradyrhizobium sp. apparently potentiates growth promotion. Proper application methods must be followed for these growth-promoting bacteria to be effective. Growth promotion in response to Azospirillum has been described in grasses such as sugarcane, maize and forages, but further research is needed under different conditions to support adoption by producers. Application of bacterial inoculates can increase competitiveness vis-à-vis conventional agriculture methods. Inoculation of grasses in livestock systems can raise forage mass production, mitigate degradation risks and improve productive indices.

Key words Bacteria; Agricultural microbiology; Rhizobacteria; Azospirillum

Resumen

El Azospirillum es un género de bacterias promotoras del crecimiento vegetal, encontrado en suelos de diferentes regiones del globo terrestre. Estas bacterias cuando se asocian a raíces de plantas, ayudan en la producción y productividad del cultivo, actuando en el aumento de parte aérea y sistema radicular. Estos beneficios se derivan de la excreción de los fitonutrientes de crecimiento, especialmente las auxinas. En las gramíneas forrajeras, la inoculación de estas cepas puede proporcionar mayores ganancias de masa de forraje con menores dosis de N-fertilizante, garantizando la sostenibilidad del sistema de producción del pasto. El uso de Azospirillum spp., en gramíneas debe llenar un vacío entre la productividad y la sostenibilidad. La promoción del crecimiento proporcionado por Azospirillum se ha descrito en varias gramíneas como la caña de azúcar, el maíz y plantas forrajeras, pero se deben realizar más estudios en diferentes condiciones para diseminar y consolidar su adopción entre los productores. La adopción de la inoculación de esta bacteria puede aumentar la competitividad de los productos agrícolas y ser un diferencial frente a la producción adoptada en la agricultura convencional. En la ganadería la inoculación en pastizales puede aumentar la producción de masa de forraje, y mitigar los riesgos de degradación y mejorar los índices productivos de ese sector.

Palabras clave Bacterias; Microbiología agricola; Rizobacterias; Azozpirillum

Introduction

Perhaps the greatest challenge intrinsic to agriculture is balancing productivity with sustainability. Apparently at cross-purposes both goals have become pressing concerns due to population growth, climate change, and consumer behavior. New technologies and techniques are needed to shift the paradigm away from traditional techniques for increasing production of grains, meat, milk, etc. through greater use of chemical fertilizers and the opening of new areas.

Nitrogen (N) can increase productivity in plants and is an essential fertilizer in commercial agriculture, especially in tropical regions. However, fertilization with N raises production costs by approximately 40 %1, and can pollute soils and water, with serious environmental consequences.

Sustainable alternatives for plant nutrition are becoming increasingly important. For example, research into the potential of biological fixation of atmospheric nitrogen (BFN) is revealing it be essential for greater grassland productivity. This process is performed by diazotrophic bacteria, commonly known as plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB). It involves conversion of atmospheric nitrogen (N2) into other nitrogen substances which are then incorporated by plants through synthesis of protein and nucleic acids2.

However, the benefits provided by PGPB extend beyond BFN3. These bacteria also stimulate production of growth hormones such as auxins, cytokinins and gibberellins, and improve absorption of other nutrients such as phosphorus. Inoculation with PGPB is a promising technology for augmenting agricultural production while reducing the environmental impacts of inadequate use of fertilizers.

Prominent among growth-promoting bacteria are those in the genus Azospirillum, the most studied of the PGPB4. This genus gained worldwide relevance in the 1970s in response to research showing it increased absorption of water and nutrients, resulting in greater drought tolerance and productivity. These responses derive from higher production of growth-promoting substances which alter root system morphology by increasing the number and diameter of secondary, lateral and adventitious roots5.

Inoculation of Azospirillum in corn (Zea mays) resulted in a 17 % increase in average ear length and productivity versus a control5. Use of Azospirillum can also reduce the need for N fertilization6, producing savings of 30 to 50 kg ha-1 N in corn at the beginning and end of the rainy season7. Considering this possibility, substitution of 50 % of the N fertilizer used in Brazil would result in reductions of 52 kg ha-1 N in corn and 35 kg ha-1 N in wheat, and a consequent savings of approximately $1.2 billion a year8. Sugarcane also requires heavy N fertilization, but interacts positively with PGPB9. Inoculation with Azospirillum brasilense produced a 10% increase in productivity compared to a treatment receiving no N fertilizer, which is equivalent to the use of 120 kg ha-1 N10.

The benefits observed with Azospirillum inoculation in corn, a forage grass, can also be expected in tropical forage grasses, possibly reversing or minimizing soil degradation risks while improving forage mass production. This is supported by a report of N2-fixing bacteria in the rhizosphere of forage grasses9, suggesting a future of lower N fertilizer use in tropical forage grasses9. Indeed, inoculation of the grass Brachiaria spp. with A. brasilense strains raised average forage mass production by 13 %1.

Azospirillum Genus

The Azospirillum genus of bacteria was discovered by J. Dobereiner and became important in the 1970s for its ability to fix atmospheric nitrogen, hence the genus name Azospirillum11. The genus has a broad geographical distribution, and can be found in temperate and tropical regions1.

Azospirillum-genus bacteria are Gram-negative and free-living. They are cane-shaped, have active movement, measure 0.8 to 2 μm in diameter and 2 to 4 μm in length, and have intracellular polyhydroxybutyrate granules12. Optimum development temperature range for these bacteria is 28 to 41 °C. These bacteria are strictly aerobic when in a N2-free environment and supplied with nitrogen or microaerophilic sources, which requires them to fix nitrogen11. However, to promote a microaerophilic environment when in a semi-solid medium these bacteria produce a thin veil-like film containing the oxygen concentration essential for nitrogen fixation and growth initiation.

Azospirillum sp. have a flexible carbon and nitrogen metabolism which augments their ability to compete for rhizosphere colonization12. When present in the rhizosphere they colonize both the mucigel layer around the roots (external colonization) and root intercellular spaces (internal colonization)8. Colonization occurs mainly in the areas of elongation and root hairs11. They are highly competitive when colonizing the rhizosphere, and to maintain metabolism make use of different nitrogen sources such as ammonia, nitrite, nitrate, molecular nitrogen and amino acids, as well as carbon sources such as organic acids (malate, pyruvate, succinate and fructose)10.

Fifteen Azospirillum species have been identified to date: A. lipoferum, A. brasilense, A. amazonense, A. halopraeferens, A. irakense, A. largimobile, A. doebereinereae, A. oryzae, A. melinis, A. canadiana, A. zeae, A. rugosum, A. palatum, A. picis and A. thiophilum. Of these the most widely researched are A. lipoferum and A. brasilense, both of which are common in tropical grasses and forages1. Not all Azospirillum species can be found colonizing plants in various regions; A. amazonense, for instance, has only been isolated in Brazil12. Azospirillum brasilense, however, is widely distributed in tropical and subtropical soils, a characteristic that contributed to its ample study13. Experiments have shown that A. brasilense promotes plant growth and consequently increases productivity14. It exhibits satisfactory results when associated with Poaceae family plants such as corn, oats, wheat and rice15.

Inoculum for plants

Widely known as biofertilizer, inoculants intended to promote plant growth contain live microorganisms that implement various mechanisms. Commercial production of biofertilizers in Latin America began in 189816, and Brazil is one of the largest current markets in the region17. Inoculants can improve competitiveness in the agricultural sector and is a promising and sustainable technology capable of partially replacing nitrogen fertilization18.

Brazil’s Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Supply (Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento da Brasil - MAPAB)19, requires that commercial inoculants contain at least 109 cells per gram or milliliter of product at their expiry date, that they must be prepared with a sterile vehicle and be free of unspecified microorganisms up to the 1x10-5 dilution factor. Traits decisive for inoculant efficacy in promoting plant growth include the strain, its competitiveness, and the number of necessary or viable cells for rapid colonization of the rhizosphere and plant tissue20. They need to be produced using non-toxic vehicles, and be water-soluble and associated with competitive lines21.

Inoculation success depends on selection of efficient, stress-resistant strains, since diazotrophic bacteria are found in various soil types and their persistence is determined by soil salinity, pH and moisture22. Azospirillum genus bacteria promote plant growth through mechanisms such as greater tolerance to environmental stressors, phytohormone production and nitrogen fixation23.

A major initiative to develop Azospirillum inoculates in Brazil began in 1996 when the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology of the Federal University of Paraná partnered with the Brazilian Agricultural Research Company (Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária - Embrapa Soja) to do field research on Azospirillum efficiency. Years of research produced Azospirillum lines that survived longer in soils and produced more plant growth16. A total of eighteen trials were run which were divided into two sets of nine trials each. The first set evaluated peat inoculants containing a single A. brasilense or A. lipoferum strain in corn using five trials with three harvests and in wheat using four trials with two harvests. The second set evaluated a mixture of two A. brasilense strains (Ab-V5 and Ab-V6) in peat or liquid inoculants in four corn trials and four wheat trials. This research contributed to the release of four A. brasilense strains (Ab-V4, Ab-V5, Ab-V6 and Ab-V7) for commercial inoculant production. Only Ab-V5 and Ab-V6 are widely used as inoculants because they provide the most satisfactory results in corn and wheat16. Due to their ease of application liquid inoculants were chosen over peat inoculants for marketing. In 2010, a liquid inoculant containing Azospirillum strains and protective molecules for tropical conditions was developed in an association between Embrapa and the private sector.

Azospirillum strains are sold worldwide in countries including Argentina, Mexico, Italy, France, Australia, Pakistan, Germany, the United States, Africa, Belgium, India and Uruguay24. The success of Azospirillum inoculants is the result of their beneficial effects in agricultural crops; for instance, they have a 60 to 70 % success rate and provide 5 to 30 % productivity gains in various cereal crops25.

Action mode of Azospirillum bacteria

Azospirillum spp. bacteria supply nitrogen to plants via different mechanisms (Table 1).

Table 1: Action modes of Azospirillum bacteria 

Action modes Source (Authors)
Plant growth regulator production (auxins, cytokinins and gibberellins) Lambrecht et al.27
Assimilatory reduction of nitrate Fages23
Biological fixation of N2 Fernandes Júnior24
Resistence to hydric stress Cohen et al.34
Growth of root system Okon and Labandera-Gonzalez25
Greater water and nutrient absorption Okon and Labandera-Gonzalez25
Biological control Unno et al.26

Production of growth regulators is one of the main mechanisms by which these bacteria affect plant growth since they influence growth in plants, modify root morphology and maximize use of soil resources, which in turn augment BFN and reduction of the assimilable nitrate available in soils24.

Azospirillum bacteria also reduce nitrate (NO3 -) in the roots, promoting plant growth due to consequent lower energy expenditure required from the plant to reduce nitrate to ammonia; this energy is allocated to other vital processes. These bacteria can influence glutamine synthetase activity in the roots of corn plants23. Glutamine synthetase is extremely important in the nitrogen incorporation process and essential for plants to express their full productive potential26. Other indirect mechanisms through which Azospirillum bacteria can promote plant growth is by reducing the appearance of fungi or soil pathogens via production of siderophores, chitinases, glucanases and antibiosis.

Growth of the plant root system, which can occur in response to growth-promoting substances25, can result in greater mineral and water absorption. Auxin, specifically indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), is the principal hormone promoting root growth15. Azospirillum lineages produce IAA in addition to other indole compounds such as cytokinins and gibberillins8. At least three biosynthetic pathways exist for IAA production in Azospirillum, two of which (indole-3-acetamide and indole-3-pyruvate) depend on tryptophan27. Indole-3-acetic acid is the main indole secreted by Azospirillum24, although indole-3-butyric acid (IBA) has also been reported23. This indole is an important reserve source in the Azospirillum genus28.

Production of IAA by Azospirillum very probably affects root growth. For example, inoculation of tomato and red pepper seeds with A. brasilense, which is known to produce IAA, increased average root length from 7.21 (control) to 9.68 cm in tomatoes and from 6.20 (control) to 6.76 cm in red pepper29. The aerial portion of the plants in this study also grew more in the treatments than in the controls, highlighting the growth promoting ability of A. brasilense. Phytohormone synthesis in A. brasilense can differ between strains. In one study the 42 M line produced higher IAA levels than the sp7, Cd, Az39, 40 and 42 strains6.

In Azospirillum strains IAA may be a signal needed to maintain a symbiotic plant-Azospirillum interaction30, since this signaling function is shaped by coevolutionary processes between bacteria and their host plant31. This phytohormone also affects photosynthesis, and biosynthesis of some metabolites and other phytohormones such as cytokinins and gibberellins32. In plants cytokinins regulate cell division and new tissue formation both in the aerial part and roots33. Gibberellins regulate plant growth, and promote division and elongation of primary roots30.

Azospirillum strains can secrete abscisic acid (ABA) which forms part of the water stress defense mechanism in plants34. This phytohormone induces plant responses to water, environmental and saline stress35. For example, inoculation of A. lipoferum into corn plants resulted in high ABA levels and increased plant tolerance to drought probably related to ABA as well as prolines and polyamines34. Polyamines (e.g. cadaverine, spermine and spermidine) are organic polymers associated with root growth and stress suppression in plants33. In a study of rice seedlings inoculated with A. brasilense cadaverine production was associated with increased root growth and reduced osmotic stress36. Corn plants inoculated with A. brasilense also are reported to exhibit greater drought resistance and higher biomass production37, possibly due to the presence of cadaverine, among other phytohormones.

Growth-promoting bacteria such as Azospirillum can also act as biological control agents35, which can occur through mechanisms such as parasitism, production of antibiotics, toxins and/or enzymes, interference in the plant-host recognition process and resistance induction33. Facultative bacteria such as those in the genera Pseudomonas, Burkholderia, Azospirillum and Bacillus, produce and secrete secondary substances that can act as antibiotics, fungicides, antivirals and immunosuppressive agents31. In plants endophytic bacteria of this type provide the best biological control of pathogens via natural colonization of the rhizosphere and invasion of internal tissues, both of which are essential means for successful treatment of diseases affecting subterranean plant tissues.

The Azospirillum genus is not strictly considered to exercise biocontrol but Azospirillum strains do produce chemical compounds that modify plant metabolism and defense activity. For instance, A. brasilense has been shown to effectively control Agrobacterium tumefaciens and phytopathogenic fungi25. Although the inhibition mode was not well defined, phenylacetic acid, from the auxin group, was identified and found to have antimicrobial activity. Phenylacetic acid is used in the defense mechanism and bacterial competition in the host25. Biological defense in plants follows two metabolic pathways involving jasmonic acid and salicylic acid17, while bacteria-induced systemic resistance is activated by the jasmonic acid and ethylene signaling pathway15.

Co-inoculation with rhizobia

Co-inoculation with bacteria that may or may not be symbiotic is common in legume crops38. Different microorganisms are used that produce a synergistic effect that surpasses production results obtained when strains are used separately39. In vitro assays indicate that some bacteria mixtures provide a synergistic interaction that can improve nutrient supply, remove inhibiting products and/or stimulate physical or biochemical mechanisms35. For example, when associated with rhizobia in legumes A. brasilense produces a beneficial effect caused by production of phytohormones that promote root system development, thus allowing more effective exploitation of available soil volume38.

In future co-inoculation between Azospirillum and other microorganisms may become a major research focus35. Co-inoculation produces higher success rates in plants since it results in increased productivity due to balanced nutrition and improved absorption of nitrogen, phosphorus and other minerals5. It also stimulates root nodule function and increases nodule numbers and weight. Co-inoculation of Bradyrhizobium japonicum and A. brasilense in soybeans provided better yields, even under water and nutrient deficit conditions39. In a study of B. japonicum/A. brasilense co-inoculation with and without water deficit, co-inoculation increased nodule weight under water deficit conditions and produced better yields and a greater dry matter accumulation under both conditions40. Studies of root growth and nodulation in soybean co-inoculated with B. japonicum/A. brasilense found that addition of A. brasilense helped to stimulate root growth and improved nodule onset and development through excretion of metabolic products, especially IAA36. The co-inoculated plants also exhibited a greater number of nodules and a higher percentage of nodulated plants.

Azospirillum in forage grasses

Grassland degradation is a major problem in livestock systems. For example, an estimated 80 % of grasslands in Brazil exhibit some level of degradation41. Of the factors that can lead to grassland degradation low nutrient supply for plants is the principal cause since it results in low grass quality and productivity42. Among soil nutrients, N is the main limiting factor for grass growth and development in the tropics43. Mineral fertilization is widely used to ensure proper grass growth, but this is expensive and environmentally damaging since around 50 % of applied N is lost due to volatilization or leaching14.

This situation highlights the potential benefits of BFN in tropical grasses as a means to restoring forage productivity and quality. Diazotrophic bacteria (a.k.a. PGPB) are the main force behind BFN. The process itself involves conversion of N2 into other nitrogenous substances which are then assimilated by plants through synthesis of protein and nucleic acids1. The nitrogen cycle in grassland ecosystems strongly depends on BFN and diazotrophic bacteria to supply N to plants. Inoculation of PGPB is therefore a promising technique for promoting growth and nutrition in forage plants. It is a viable alternative for totally or partially replacing N-fertilizer and thus contributing to natural resources conservation44.

The benefits of PGPB in crops such as corn, wheat and rice are clear, but knowledge of the mechanisms involved requires extensive further research. Studies evaluating the effects of PGPB in establishing and maintaining pastures are fundamental to attaining cost-effective and sustainable grassland systems. Using BFN supports sustainability since it can totally or partially replace nitrogen fertilizers, which are produced from non-renewable fossil fuels45. Any lowering of N fertilizer use will also mitigate environmental pollution derived from its production and use, with the added dividend of reducing greenhouse gas emissions8.

A metanalysis of 22 yr of data on in-field PGPB inoculation concluded that Azospirillum spp. promotes growth in several grass species under different environmental conditions5. These gains went beyond BFN to include modification of root production and a consequent broadening of absorption area and the volume of exploited soil. Most of the research supporting this conclusion has involved inoculation of Azospirillum in forage grasses.

Azospirillum brasilense was reported to increase dry matter production and foliar growth in pot-grown millet Setaria italica46. In a study of forage grasses native to the Pantanal Matogrossense in South America, inoculation with diazotrophic bacteria had noticeable effects at 60 and 90 d of culture47. Combined inoculation of an A. brasilense/A. lipoferum association in the same study resulted in greater dry matter production in the aerial portion and roots, as well as N accumulation. Higher dry matter production than in a control was also observed with inoculation of A. brasilense in the grasses in a natural pasture48.

Inoculation is also reported to favor the simultaneous production of dry matter in the aerial portion and roots, and high levels of phosphorus (P) and N accumulation due to more efficient use of these nutrients14. This higher dry matter accumulation rate may be related to an increase in photosynthetic enzyme activity and N assimilation8. Similar increases in dry matter production have been observed with inoculation of Marandú grass, indicating this technique is a sustainable alternative for increasing forage production49. Azospirillum inoculation has also increased productivity in other grasses50, which may be due to excretion of plant hormones that enhance macro- and micronutrient absorption35.

Use of PGPB is reported to raise nitrogen accumulation and overall yields. In a study using Pennisetum and Panicum species grasses inoculation with A. brasilense increased N content by approximately 40 kg ha-1 year-1 via BFN25. In another study BFN was found to raise N accumulation 7 to 10 kg ha-1 mo-1 during the summer, which varied by grass genotype; this represents 39% of the N necessary for plant development and productivity51. Dry matter accumulation rate in the same study was 15 kg ha-1 d-1 in the inoculated treatments, almost four-fold higher than the 4 kg ha-1 d-1 in a control without inoculation and fertilization.

Inoculation of A. brasilense in Brachiaria brizantha Staf cv. Marandu, produced better yield, greater tiller generation and a longer grazing period than uninoculated and unfertilized plants49. In this same system root dry matter production increased with A. brasilense inoculation33. Using the same grass cultivar, another study found that A. brasilense inoculation produced 9 % more leaves and 12 % more tillers than a control, although no differences in plant height were observed between inoculation and N fertilization treatments52.

Application of A. brasilense in forage grass production contributes to increasing dry matter content, N content and plant height, making PGPB inoculation a viable alternative for partial replacement of N fertilizer. It can be a vital element in efforts to combine animal production with environmental conservation, which will become more feasible as soil biotechnology is broadly employed to promote soil conservation and fertility and improve plant nutrition. However, more research is needed on the mechanisms and effects of PGPB inoculation on dry matter content, N content, plant height, leaf area and crude protein content so recommendations can be made regarding its combination with N fertilizer1. In addition, there is still no conclusive data indicating whether the effects of inoculation are due to BFN or hormonal action.

Azospirillum in corn

Yield in corn responds to a combination of genetic potential, environmental conditions and soil fertility. However, attaining maximum yields requires application of large amounts of fertilizers, particularly nitrogen. One option for reducing use of N fertilizers with corn is application of Azospirillum spp. strains, since it can reduce their use by 30 to 50 kg ha-17.

More specifically, inoculation with A. brasilense increases photosynthesis and dry matter accumulation rates8. When associated with unimproved and cultured genotypes with low N availability, Azospirillum inoculation leads to greater dry matter production, grain yield and N accumulation in corn5. It can also increase overall grain production by 9 %53, and productivity by 30 %8. Some authors report better results when inoculating Azospirillum in corn seeds, with average increases of 70 % in dry root mass and 43.5 % in aerial dry mass54.

Inoculation process

Inoculation is a simple procedure in which seeds are mixed with an inoculant. It is preferably done in the shade in the morning to prevent direct sunlight and excessive heat from killing the bacteria. Mixing is done in a rotating drum, cement mixer, seed treatment machine or other machine. It is important to uniformly distribute the inoculant on the seeds and verify that each seed is covered by inoculant before sowing. For this technique to be effective seeds must be of good quality and the proper dose of inoculant/kg seed must be applied. After inoculant application the seeds are dried for about 30 min before sowing, all the while protected from sunlight and heat. For peat mixture inoculants a sugar solution or other adhesive substance (gum arabic, arrowroot flour, cassava flour, wheat flour and/or various types of cells and polymers) is recommended to moisten the seeds. In this case, a 10 % sugar solution (100 g sugar/L water) is prepared, the seeds mixed into it at a proportion of 250 to 300 ml sugar solution per 50 kg seeds, and finally the peat mixed in at the proportion indicated by the manufacturer8. In either process, the seeds have a thin layer of inoculant on their surface when it is complete. It is extremely important to verify that all seeds have been covered with inoculant since this will ensure nitrogen fixation and expression of their full genetic potential.

Inoculated seeds should be sown the same day they are inoculated to ensure the highest number of viable microorganisms. If this is not feasible, the seeds can be stored in ventilated sheds by spreading them out on a smooth surface in layers less than 30 cm thick12. The inoculant contains live microorganisms which are sensitive to hot environments16, and seeds should therefore be sown a maximum of 24 h post- inoculation. If this period is exceeded, the seeds must be re-inoculated to improve efficacy. During sowing, the seed container on sowing machines can become quite hot (35+ °C), which can kill the bacteria; should this occur sowing should be stopped and the container cooled. Direct inoculation in the seed container is not recommended because inoculant distribution is not uniform, which reduces inoculation efficiency16.

Inoculation of small lots of seeds can be done with clean plastic bags, basins or buckets previously sterilized with 70% alcohol, as long as all seeds are covered with a thin layer of inoculant. Other aspects of the process follow the same criteria as when using a rotating drum or concrete mixer, namely that it be done in the shade, that inoculated seeds be allowed to dry for 30 min before sowing, and that doses be calculated following manufacturer instructions to ensure maximum efficiency12.

For beans planted in small areas direct inoculation in the furrow is an alternative technique. Application can be done with a manual or motorized sprayer directly in the furrow. If using this technique, the inoculant must be mixed with water following manufacturer instructions and the sprayer to be used cannot have residues of agrochemicals such as pesticides or herbicides as these can decrease bacteria viability and lower efficiency. Even though the inoculant consists of soil bacteria, the operator must wear personal protection gear.

Final considerations

Use of Azospirillum spp. in grasses can span the gap between productivity and sustainability. Inoculants based on these microorganisms can potentially reduce nitrogen fertilizer use without affecting productivity, resulting in savings and greater profitability. Grasses such as sugarcane, corn and forages are known to respond well to Azospirillum sp. inoculation, but further study is needed under different conditions to support its broader adoption among producers. This technique can increase competitiveness for some agricultural products vis-à-vis conventionally-grown crops. Grassland inoculation in livestock production can increase forage mass production, mitigate degradation risks and improve production rates.

Literatura citada:

1. Hungria M, Nogueira MA, Araujo RS. Inoculation of Brachiaria spp. with the plant growth-promoting bacterium Azospirillum brasilense: An environment-friendly component in the reclamation of degraded pastures in the tropics. Agr Ecosyst Environ 2016;(221):125-131. [ Links ]

2. Nunes FS, Raimondi AC, Niedwieski AC. Fixação de nitrogênio: estrutura, função e modelagem bioinorgânica das nitrogenases. Químic Nov 2003;26(6):872-879. [ Links ]

3. Dobbelaere S, Vanderleyden J, Okon Y. Plant growth-promoting effects of diazotrophs in the rhizosphere. Plant Scienc 2003;(22):107-149. [ Links ]

4. Döbereiner J, Marriel IE, Nery M. Ecological distribution of Spirillum lipoferum Beijerinck. Can J Microbiol 1976;(22):1464-1473. [ Links ]

5. Okon Y, Vanderleyden J. Root-associated Azospirillum species can stimulate plants, Appl Environ Microbiol 1997;63(7):366-370. [ Links ]

6. Cheng NC, Novakowiski JH, Sandini I, Domingues L. Substituição da adubação nitrogenada de base pela inoculação com Azospirillum brasilense na cultura do milho. In.: Seminário Nacional de Milho Safrinha, 11. Anais... Lucas do Rio Verde: Fundação Rio Verde; 2011:377-382. [ Links ]

7. Fancelli AL. Boas práticas para o uso eficiente de fertilizantes na cultura do milho. Piracicaba: IPNI - International Plant Nutrition Institute Brazil, (IPNI. Informações Agronômicas, 131). 2010. [ Links ]

8. Hungria M, Campo R, Souza E, Pedrosa F. Inoculation with selected strains of Azospirillum brasilense and A. lipoferum improves yields of maize and wheat in Brazil. Plant Soil 2010;(331):413-425. [ Links ]

9. Boddey RM, Xavier D, Alves BJR, Urquiaga S. Brazilian agriculture: the transition to sustainability. J Crop Produc 2003;(9):593-621. [ Links ]

10. Schultz N, Morais RF, Silva JA, et al. Avaliação agronômica de duas variedades de cana-de-açúcar inoculadas com bactérias diazotróficas e adubadas com nitrogênio. Pesq Agropec Bras 2012;(47):261-268. [ Links ]

11. Dobbelaere S, Croonenborghs A, Thys A, Ptacek D, Okon Y, Vanderleyden J. Effect of inoculation with wild type Azospirillum brasilense and A. irakense strains on development and nitrogen uptake of spring wheat and grain maize. Biol Fertil Soil 2002; (36):284-297. [ Links ]

12. Trentini DB. Identificação dos alvos celulares das proteínas de transdução de sinal PII do diazotrófico de vida livre Azospirillum amazonense [tesis maestria]. Brasil, RS: Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul; 2010. [ Links ]

13. Zambrano ER, Jiménez Salgado T, Tapia Hernández A. Estudo de bacterias asociadas a orquídeas (Orchidaceae). Lankesteriana 2007; 7 (1-2):322-325. [ Links ]

14. Reis VM, Baldini JI, Baldini VLD, Dobereiner J. Biological dinitrogen fixation in gramineae and palm Trees. Plant Sci 2000;(19): -247. [ Links ]

15. Hartmann A, Baldani JI. The genus Azospirillum. In: Dworkin M editor. The Prokaryotes. 1rst ed. New York, New York: Springer; 2006:115-140. [ Links ]

16. Hungria M. Inoculação com Azospirillum brasilense: inovação em rendimento a baixo custo. Embrapa Soja - Documentos 325, 2011. [ Links ]

17. Silva MF, Reis VM. Produção, caracterização e aplicação de anticorpo policlonal contra Azospirillum amazonense estirpe AM 15. Rev Cien Agro 2009;68(1):1-11. [ Links ]

18. Chueire LMO. Classificação taxonômica das estirpes de rizóbio recomendadas para as culturas da soja e do feijoeiro baseada no sequenciamento do gene 16s rRNA. Rev Bras Cienc Solo 2003;27(5):833-840. [ Links ]

19. Silveira ÉL. Inoculações de bactérias promotoras de crescimento no cultivo de arroz em solução nutritiva [doctoral thesis]. Brasil, SP: Universidade Estadual Paulista, Jaboticabal; 2008. [ Links ]

20. MAPA, Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento. Portaria nº36 de 3 de agosto de 2004- Anexo I. Diário oficial da União da República Federativa do Brasil, Brasília, nº 153 de 10 de agosto, 2004. Brasilia, DF, BRA: Ministério de Agriscultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento; 2004. [ Links ]

21. Deaker R, Roughley RJ, Kennedy IR. Legume seed inoculation technologyda review. Soil Biol Bioch 2004;(36):1275-1288. [ Links ]

22. Fernandes Júnior PI. Composições poliméricas a base de Carboximetilcelulose (CMC) e Amido como veículos de inoculação de Rizóbio em leguminosas [tesis maestria]. Brasil, RJ: Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro; 2006. [ Links ]

23. Fages J. Azospirillum inoculants and field experiments. En: Okon Y, editor. Azospirillum/plant associations. Boca Raton: CRC. 1994:87-109. [ Links ]

24. Mehnaz S. Azospirillum: a biofertilizerfor every crop. In: Arora NK editor. Plant microbes symbiosis: Applied facets. 2015. [ Links ]

25. Okon Y, Labandera-Gonzalez CA. Agronomic applications of Azospirillum: an evaluation of 20 years worldwide field inoculation. Soil Biol Bioch 1996;(26):1591-1601. [ Links ]

26. Unno H. Atomic structure of plant glutamine synthetase. J Biol Chem 2006;281(39): 29287-29296. [ Links ]

27. Lambrecht M, Okon Y, Vande Broek A, Vandereleyden J. Indole-3-acetic acid: a reciprocal signalling molecule in bacteria-plant interactions. Trends Microbiol 2000;(8):298-300. [ Links ]

28. Duca S, Verderio E, Serafini-Fracassini D, et al. The plant extracellular transglutaminase: what mammal analogues tell. Amino Acids 2014;(46):777-792. [ Links ]

29. Madhaiyan M, Poonguzhali S, Kwon SW, et al. Bacillus methylotrophicus sp. nov., a methanol-utilizing, plantgrowth-promoting bacterium isolated from rice rhizosphere soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2010;(60):2490-2495. [ Links ]

30. Malhotra M, Srivastava S. Stress-responsive indole-3-acetic acid biosynthesis by Azospirillum brasilense SM and its ability to modulate plant growth. Eur J Soil Biol 2009;(45):73-80. [ Links ]

31. Walker TS, Bais HP, Grotewold E, et al. Root exudation and rhizosphere biology. Plant Physiol 2003;(132):44-51. [ Links ]

32. Ilyas N, Bano A. Azospirillum strains isolated from roots and rhizosphere soil of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grown under different soil moisture conditions. Biol Fert Soils 2010;46(4):393-406. [ Links ]

33. Spaepen S, Vanderleyden J, Okon Y. Plant growth-promoting actions of rhizobacteria. Adv Bot Res 2009;(51):283-320. [ Links ]

34. Cohen AC, Bottini R, Pontin M, et al. Azospirillum brasilense ameliorates the response of Arabidopsis thaliana to drought mainly via enhancement of ABA levels. Physiol Plant 2015;(153):79-90. [ Links ]

35. Bashan Y, Holguin G, Bashan LE. Azospirillum-plant relationships: physiological, molecular, agricultural, and environmental advances (1997-2003). Canad J Microbiol 2004;(50):521-577. [ Links ]

36. Cassán F, Maiale S, Masciarelli O, et al. Cadaverine production by Azospirillum brasilense and its possible role in plant growth promotion and osmotic stress mitigation. Eur J Soil Biol 2009;(45):12-19. [ Links ]

37. Rodríguez-Salazar J, Suárez R, Caballero-Mellado J, Iturriaga G. Trehalose accumulation in Azospirillum brasilense improves drought tolerance and biomass in maize plants. Microbiol Lett 2009;(296):52-59. [ Links ]

38. Bárbaro IM. Técnica alternativa: co-inoculação de soja com Azospirillum e Bradyrhizobium visando incremento de produtividade. 2008. [ Links ]

39. Ferlini HA. Co-Inoculación en Soja (Glicyne max) con Bradyrhizobium japonicum y Azospirillum brasilense. 2006. [ Links ]

40. Benintende S, Uhrich W, Herrera M, et al. Comparación entre coinoculación con Bradyrhizobium japonicum y Azospirillum brasilense e inoculación simple con Bradyrhizobium japonicum en la nodulación, crecimiento y acumulación de N en el cultivo de soja. Agriscient 2009;(27):71-77. [ Links ]

41. Macedo MCM. Pastagens no ecossistema Cerrado: evolução das pesquisas para o desenvolvimento sustentável. Reunião anual da sociedade brasileira de zootecnia. Goiânia. 2005:56-84. [ Links ]

42. Batista K. Resposta do capim-marandu a combinações de doses de nitrogênio e enxofre [tesis maestria]. Brasil, SP: Universidade de São Paulo; 2002. [ Links ]

43. Werner JC. A dubação de pastagens de Brachiaria spp. In: Anais do XI Simpósio Sobre Manejo de Pastagens. 1994. [ Links ]

44. Vogel GF, Martinkoski L, Ruzicki M. Efeitos da utilização de Azospirillum brasilense em poáceas forrageiras: Importâncias e resultados. Agropec Científic no Semi-Árido 2014;(10):01-06. [ Links ]

45. Bergamaschi C. Ocorrência de bactérias diazotróficas associadas às raízes e colmos de cultivares de sorgo [tesis maestria]. Brasil, RS: Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul; 2006. [ Links ]

46. Fallik E, Okon Y. The response of maize (Zea mays) to Azospirillum inoculation in various types of soils in the field. World J Microb Biot 1996;(12):511-515. [ Links ]

47. Brasil MS, Baldani JI, Baldani BLD. Ocorrência e diversidade de bactérias diazotróficas associadas a gramíneas forrageiras do Pantanal Sul Matogrossense. R Bras Ciênc Solo 2005;(29):179-190. [ Links ]

48. Itzigsohn R, Burdman S, Okon Y, Zaady E, et al. Plant-growth promotion in natural pastures by inoculation with Azospirillum brasilense under suboptimal growth conditions. Arid Soil Res 2000;(13):151-158. [ Links ]

49. Oliveira PPA, Oliveira WS, Barioni WJ. Produção de forragem e qualidade de Brachiaria brizantha cv. Marandu com Azospirillum brasilense e fertilizada com nitrogênio. Embrapa pecuária sudeste, São Carlos, SP, 2007. [ Links ]

50. Fiori CCL, Bartchechen A, Watanabi SH, Guarido RC. Efeito da inoculação de Azospirillum brasiliense na produtividade da cultura do milho (Zea mays L). Campo Digit@l 2010;(5):56-59. [ Links ]

51. Guimarães SL, Bonfim-Silva EM Polizel AC, Campos TS. Produção de capim marandu inoculado com Azospirillum spp. Enciclopédia Biosfera 2011;(7):13-21. [ Links ]

52. Franche CK, Lindstrom C, Elmerich AB. Nitrogen fixing bacteria associated with leguminous and non-leguminous plants. Plant Soil 2009;(321):35-59. [ Links ]

53. Barros Neto CR. Efeito do nitrogênio e da inoculação de sementes com Azospirillum brasiliense no rendimento de grãos de milho. 2008. 29 p. Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso (Graduação em Agronomia) - Setor de Ciências Agrárias e de Tecnologia, Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa, Paraná. [ Links ]

54. Braccini AL, Dan LGM, Piccinin GG, Albrecht LP, Barbosa MC, Ortiz AHT. Seed inoculation with Azospirillum brasilense, associated with theuse of bioregulators in maize. Revista Caatinga 2012;(25):17-23. [ Links ]

Received: June 16, 2018; Accepted: January 30, 2019

Creative Commons License Este es un artículo publicado en acceso abierto bajo una licencia Creative Commons