SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.10 número4Suplementación con ácido ascórbico para mejorar la fertilidad del ganado lechero. RevisiónEvaluación productiva y análisis costo-beneficio de cerdas alimentadas con una dieta adicionada con nopal (Opuntia ficus-indica) durante la lactancia índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Revista mexicana de ciencias pecuarias

versión On-line ISSN 2448-6698versión impresa ISSN 2007-1124

Rev. mex. de cienc. pecuarias vol.10 no.4 Mérida oct./dic. 2019  Epub 30-Abr-2020

https://doi.org/10.22319/rmcp.v10i4.4575 

Technical notes

Effect of Moringa oleifera intake on productive and toxicological parameters in broiler chickens

Martha K. Fuentes Esparzaa 

Teódulo Quezada Tristána  * 

Salvador H. Guzmán Maldonadob 

Arturo G. Valdivia-Floresa 

Raúl Ortíz-Martíneza 

a Universidad Autónoma de Aguascalientes. Centro de Ciencias Agropecuarias, Departamento de Clínica Veterinaria, Av. Universidad N° 904, 20131 Aguascalientes, Aguascalientes, México.

b Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias. Laboratorio de Alimentos Funcionales, Guanajuato. México.


Abstract:

Poultry farming is common in rural Mexico in part because it provides extra household income. Alternative protein sources for poultry feed are needed for these systems. An evaluation was done of how 10% inclusion of Moringa oleifera leaf in diets for broilers affected productive and blood parameters. A proximal analysis, and Fe, Ca and tannins contents were quantified for moringa leaf flour. Four productive and six blood parameters (two proteins and four enzymes) were evaluated in Ross-308 broilers. Histopathological analyses were done of liver and kidney tissue. The moringa leaf flour contained 33.4% protein, and had high iron (19.7 mg/100 g) and calcium (2593.3 mg/100 g) contents, as well as low tannins content (24.4 mg CE/100 g). Compared to a control, daily weight gain decreased 12 % in the moringa leaf treatment while productivity index values decreased 20%. No differences were observed between the control and treatment in terms of protein content, and alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase activities. However, differences in albumin, alkaline phosphatase and the glutamyl transpeptidase levels suggest possible liver and renal damage in the moringa leaf treatment. These results were not confirmed in the histological analysis. Further research is needed using lower moringa leaf flour inclusion levels to compare to the present results and better define possible inclusion levels in poultry diets.

Key words Broilers; Moringa; Productivity; Serology; Histopathology

Resumen

Es necesario explorar fuentes de proteína alterna para adicionar a la alimentación de aves en regiones rurales. Son contados los estudios realizados en moringa para este propósito. Se determinó el análisis proximal, el contenido de Fe, Ca y taninos a la harina de hoja de moringa. Se evaluó el efecto del consumo de una dieta con 10 % de harina sobre cuatro parámetros productivos y seis serológicos (dos proteínas y cuatro enzimas) en pollos de engorda Ross-308. También se realizaron estudios histopatológicos del hígado y riñón de los pollos. La hoja de moringa presentó 33.4 % de proteína y un alto contenido de hierro (19.7 mg/100 g) y calcio (2593.3 mg/100 g) así como bajo contenido de taninos (24.4 mg EC/100 g). Se observó una reducción del 12 y 20 % en la ganancia en peso y en el índice de productividad, respectivamente, en los pollos a los que se les adicionó moringa. No se observaron diferencias entre el grupo control y el adicionado con moringa en el contenido de proteínas y la actividad de la alanino aminotransferasa y la aspartato aminotransferasa, pero si en la albúmina, la fosfatasa alcalina y la gama galutamil transpeptidasa, que sugiere cierto daño hepático y renal. Estos resultados no se observaron en los estudios histológicos. Se sugiere seguir realizando estudios con niveles de complementación menor con la harina de moringa para comparar los efectos encontrados en el presente estudio y así poder definir su uso potencial.

Palabras clave Pollos de engorda; Moringa; Productividad; Serología; Histopatología

Commercial poultry farming is a major industry in Mexico1. Poultry feed can include pastes from cottonseed, peanuts, safflower seeds, sesame seeds and coconut as sources of protein and other nutrients, although these are all lysine deficient. Soybean paste, in contrast, is a protein source with an optimal amino acids balance for animal feed2. Poultry farming, including growing of backyard chickens, is important in the country’s rural communities since it provides families with meat and eggs as well as surplus birds for sale3. Greater research is needed on protein sources from locally available resources which can be added to the poultry feeds used in rural areas such as corn, food scraps and other materials.

The tree Moringa oleifera has been studied as a protein source for animals4,5 and humans6. Native to India and Pakistan, it was introduced to Mexico7. The moringa leaf contains 20 to 30 % protein, 5.0 to 7.5 % fat and 25 to 31 % fiber8,9. It is also a good source of iron, calcium and vitamin C9. Due to the other phytochemicals it contains, moringa leaf has also been recommended for treating gastrointestinal ulcers10, lowering cholesterol levels and as a source of antioxidants11.

Moringa leaf has been used in feed for rabbits12, goats5, sheep13 and cows14, among other domestic species. Only minimal research has been done on the use of moringa leaf as an ingredient in feed for broilers. Studies have been done evaluating its effect on intestine morphology and the condition of other internal organs15,16, breast fatty acids content17, tibia strength and mineral content18, animal weight, hematology and immune response4,19. Only two of these studies have evaluated moringa leaf’s effect on weight gain4,19, and one used Moringa stenopetala4, a different species in the same genus.

The present study objective was to characterize nutritional content and vitamin C and condensed tannins levels in Moringa oleifera leaf flour, and evaluate its effect on productive and toxicological parameters when included in diets for broiler chickens.

Leaves were harvested from two-year-old M. oleifera trees in an orchard in the municipality of Gasca, in the state of Guanajuato, Mexico. Immediately after harvest the leaves were washed and disinfected with a 0.1% sodium hypochlorite solution followed by sterile distilled water, and dried in the shade. The dried leaves were milled with a hammer mill (2.0-3.0 mm sieve) and stored at -20 °C until analysis and inclusion in broiler diets. Experimental animals were 180 ROSS-308 line broilers (39 ± 1.5 g initial weight), mixed, which were one-day old at experiment outset.

The animal trial was carried out at the Poultry Unit of the Livestock Area of the Zootechnical Station of the Autonomous University of Aguascalientes, in the municipality of Jesús María, in the state of Aguascalientes. The chickens were randomly selected to form two groups with three repetitions of thirty birds each. They were fed either a conventional feed (T1) or a conventional feed plus 10% moringa leaf flour (MF). Both diets were isoproteic and isoenergetic20 (Table 1). Feed and water were freely available throughout the 42-day experimental period.

Table 1 Experimental diet ingredients and nutritional composition 

Moringa oleifera leaf flour (%)
0 10 0 10
Ingredients (g/kg) Broilers 1-21 days Broilers 22-42 days
Sorghum (8.5%) 600 560 685 640
Soy paste (46%) 335 280 250 200
Moringa leaf flour (33.4%) 0.0 100 0.0 100
Vegetable oil 25 20 25 20
Micro pollo eng 1a 40 40 0.0 0.0
Micro pollo eng 2b 0.0 0.0 40 40
Calculatedc 3150 3150 3200 3200
Metabolic energy/bird, kcal/kg 21.0 21.0 18.0 18.0
Total lysine, % 0.52 0.54 0.48 0.50
Digestible lysine, % 0.81 0.83 0.75 0.75
Digestible methionine, % 0.73 0.75 0.66 0.68
Digestible methionine+cysteine, % 0.23 0.24 0.20 0.21
Digestible threonine, % 0.13 0.14 0.11 0.12
Digestible tryptophan, % 4.0 4.4 3.5 4.0
% Digestible arginine, % 0.884 0.902 0.824 0.411
Calcium, % 0.213 0.213 0.205 0.205
Available phosphorous, % 1.236 1.263 1.115 1.139
Na, % 1.137 1.163 1.029 1.050
Crude fiber, % 0.350 0.451 0.311 0.824

a Initiation feed supplement (g/kg product): 12.6 L-lysine HCl; 56.6 methionine; 10.2 60% choline chloride (National);274 21% orthophosphate; 10 25% copper sulfate; 50 ground salt (Roche); 10 mineral oil 90 NF (Petroblanc) ; 10 Bacitracin B.M.D. 110; 169.4 soybean paste; 40 baking soda; 7.6 Ronozyme VP; 10 Sacox; 268 M-20 calcium; 60 V/init broiler plus NF/3*Ton; 7.5 Vip/Prem/A/Prem Lucantin yellow at 10; 4 Invivo/P/AYC/Prem Ronozyme Hiphos GT/1*Ton.

bMineral, vitamin and amino acid supplement (kg product): 10,000,000 IU vit A; 3,000,000 IU vit D3; 7,000 IU vit E; 1.5 g vit K; 4.4 g riboflavin;15 mg vit B12; 5.5 g pantothenic acid; 25 g niacin; 25 mg biotin; 1 g thiamine; 0.5 g folic acid; 32.5 g iron; 50 g manganese; 50 g zinc; 4.5 g copper; 150 mg selenium; 450 mg iodine; 150 g choline; 50 g antioxidant. Vehicle: 3 Kg.

a Finishing feed supplement (g/kg product): 25 L-lysine HCl; 1.8 L-threonine; 64.8 methionine; 64.8 60% choline chloride (National); 186 21% orthophosphate; 10 25% copper sulfate; 50 ground salt (Roche); 10 90 NF mineral oil (Petroblanc); 10 Bacitracin B.M.D. 110; 235.6 soybean paste; 30 baking soda; 5 Ronozyme VP; 11 Sacox; 5 Progen 20; 244 M-20calcium. 64 V/init broiler plus NF/3* Ton; 37.5 Vip/Prem/A/Prem Lucantin yellow at 10.

b Mineral, vitamin and amino acid supplement (kg product): 10,000,000 IU vit A; 3,000,000 IU vit D3; 7,000 IU vit E; 1.5 g vit K; 4.4 g riboflavin;15 mg vit B12; 5.5 g pantothenic acid; 25 g niacin; 25 mg biotin; 1 g thiamine; 0.5 g folic acid; 32.5 g iron; 50 g manganese; 50 g zinc; 4.5 g copper; 150 mg selenium; 450 mg iodine; 150 g choline; 50 g antioxidant.

c Calculated according to NRC (1994).

Proximal analysis of the moringa flour was done with established methods for protein (960.52), fiber (991.43 G, H), fat (920.85) and ash (923.03)21. Carbohydrate content was calculated by the percentage difference compared to the previous analyses. Iron and calcium content were determined by atomic absorption spectrometry22, and vitamin C by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)23. Total phenols24 and condensed tannins25 contents were also determined.

Daily records were kept of feed provided and consumed. At the end of the experiment calculations were done of average weight (AW), daily weight gain (DWG), feed conversion rate (FCR) and the productivity index (PI)26.

After 42 d blood samples were taken to quantify total proteins (TP) and albumin (ALB); as well as blood levels of alanine amino transferase (ALT), aspartate amino transferase (AST), alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and gamma glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT)27.

Blood samples were taken from three chickens selected from each of the three replicates of the two groups originally formed. These were killed by cervical dislocation following the Ethical Management and Humanitarian Sacrifice Guide of the Autonomous University of Aguascalientes. Samples (1 cm3) of liver and kidney were taken for histopathological analysis28. In the liver, evaluations were done of the condition of the histo-architecture of the hepatic parenchyma, presence or absence of inflammation cells, the Möll space, the Disse space, the hepatic sinusoids and the bile ducts. In the hepatocytes evaluations were done of the nucleus-cytoplasm relationship, cell nucleus characteristics (pyknosis, karyolysis and karyorrhexis) and presence or absence of lipid vacuoles in the cytoplasm.

The data were processed with an analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Student t test with repeated measurements and a P<0.05. All statistical analyses were run with the Statistical Analysis System statistical package (SAS, 2001)29.

The moringa leaf flour in the present study had a higher protein content (33.4%) than reported elsewhere for this species (20.0 to 29.0 %)8,9,30 (Table 2). The higher protein content in the present results was probably because the reported data were from other moringa species and/or local environmental conditions affected protein content9. The remaining compounds were within ranges reported in the literature8,9,30. Moringa is known to be a good source of iron and calcium (Ca= 2.6 g; Fe= 19 mg/100g)9, which is consistent with the present results (Table 2)31. Moringa may therefore contribute substantial amounts of calcium when added to animal feed. Its high iron content may assist in synthesis when added to broiler diets, and its vitamin C content could promote metabolism32; indeed, the combination of these compounds could contribute to this phenomenon.

Table 2 Proximate analysis (%), and mineral and vitamin C (mg/100 g, DM) and condensed tannins (mg CE/100 g, DM) contents in Moringa oleifera leaf 

Compound Content
Proximate chemical analysis (%)
Protein 33.4 ± 0.72
Fiber 8.8 ± 0.70
Fat 8.1 ± 0.41
Ash 2.3 ± 0.46
Carbohydrates 47.4 ± 0.52
Minerals (mg/100 g DM)
Iron 19.7 ± 1.07
Calcium 2593.3 ± 121
Vitamin C 63.5 ± 1.63
Tannins (mg CE/100 g, DM) 24.4 ± 0.92

CE= catechin equivalents, DM= dry matter..

Use of sorghum with high tannin content (1,360 mg/100 g) in broiler diets is reported to reduce weight gain, feed intake and absorption of iron and calcium, among other minerals33. The moringa leaf flour used in the experiment had a very low tannin content, suggesting it did not have any antinutritional effect in the experimental animals.

Average final weight in the MF treatment was 414 g less than those in the control group (Figure 1A). This weight loss reflects the lower feed intake in the MF treatment (Table 3). Average total feed intake per replicate in each treatment was 123.35 kg in the control group and 107.19 kg in the MF group. This 16.16 kg difference (P<0.05) in the MF treatment can be attributed to higher dietary fiber intake. This contrasts with a study in which broilers were fed diets containing from 5 to 14 % flour from M. stenopetala in which the 5 to 11 % M. stenopetala diets exhibited no weight difference compared to the control4. The difference between this study and the present results may be attributed to use of different moringa species in each. The difference in average weight in the present results was also reflected in the DWG results throughout the study (Figure 1B); at no time did DWG in the MF treatment exceed that in the control group.

Asterisks indicate signficant difference (Student t, P<0.05, n=63).

Figure 1 Production parameters in the control and moringa flour treatment: A) Average weight at 42 d (g); B) Daily weight gain (g/d); C) feed conversion index (feed intake/weight); D) productivity index (daily weight gain) (viability)/(FCx10).  

Table 3 Average feed intake (kg) in control and moringa flour treatment (n=30) 

Age (days) Control (kg) Moringa (kg)
7 4.42 ± 0.425 4.04 ± 0.327
14 11.42 ± 0.915 9.13 ± 0.721
21 18.00 ± 0.740 12.49 ± 0.951
28 24.45 ± 1.198 16.77 ± 1.114
35 30.90 ± 1.255 27.65 ± 1.300
42 34.16 ±1.322 37.11 ± 1.625
123.35 ± 7.255 107.19 ± 6.234

The lower the FCR the more efficiently a feed increases animal weight(26). In the present results the FCR in the two treatments was similar only in the second and third weeks (Figure 1C). In a study conducted with M. stenopetala, no differences in FCR compared to the control were observed in broilers fed diets containing from 5 to 8 % moringa leaf(4). However, at higher moringa inclusion levels the FCR increased, with the 14 % moringa leaf diet resulting in the lowest weight. Productivity index (PI) values were 21% higher in the control group than in the MF treatment, probably because average weight, DWG and FCR results for the latter treatment were lower (Figure 2D).

Total protein (TP) content did not differ between the treatments (Figure 2A), although albumin content was higher in the MF treatment (Figure 2B). However, in both cases TP levels were lower than the reported reference values for poultry (3.1 to 5.05 g/dl)(34). The low globulin levels observed in both treatments in the present study may be associated with pathologies in the liver and/or kidney, or intrinsic factors typical of the studied animals.

ab Different lowercase letters in the same parameter indicate significant difference (P<0.05 n=90).

Figure 2 Blood protein and enzyme activity levels in the control and moringa flour treatment: A) total proteins (g/dl); B) albumin (g/dl); C) alanine amino transferase (IU/L); D) aspartate amino transferase (IU/L); E) alkaline phosphatase (IU/L); and F) gamma glutamyl transferase (IU/L). 

No differences (P>0.05) were observed in ALT and AST activities (Figure 2C and 2D). However, in the MF treatment the ALT level was 35.1 IU/L, near the reference maximum for this enzyme (9.5 to 37.2 IU/L)35. Values above this maximum for ALT suggest hepatic and renal damage36. The lack of a difference in AST is to be expected since chronic liver damage normally only causes subtle cell rupture, which manifests as normal or even decreasing AST levels37, as was observed in the MF treatment (Figure 2D). Values for AST activity above 275 IU/L may be related to liver or muscle disturbances, while values above 800 IU/L strongly suggest severe liver damage38; this was not the case in the present study.

Activities for ALP and GGT differed between the treatments (Figure 2E and 2F). The reference ALP activity value is 600 IU/L4, which is higher than occurred in both groups (Control and MF). Increases in ALP activity suggest bone growth, osteomyelitis and neoplasms38, although it is not known if these problems arise at levels higher than the reference. The present results do not allow verification of whether this problem occurred in the MF treatment.

The membrane enzyme GGT is associated with a protein and linked to the level of amino acid metabolism. Increased GGT activity can be caused by inflammation, biliary cholestasis and bile duct hyperplasia39. A 25% increase in GGT activity was observed in the MF treatment (Figure 2F). Normal GGT values are between 0-10 IU/L40. Based on the reference values, both groups of birds apparently exhibited active liver lesion41.

No micromorphological differences were apparent between the groups (Figure 3A and 3B) since the evaluated structures exhibited no congestion, inflammation, scar tissue, liquefaction, lipid vacuoles, pyknosis, karyolysis or karyorrhexis.

A) (a) histological architecture of parenchyma; (b) basophilic cells; (c) Möll space; (d) sinusoids, (e) bile ducts; and (f) hepatocytes.

B) (a) parenchyma; (b) sinusoids; and (c) centrilobular vein.

C) (a) renal glomeruli; (b) proximal tubule; (c) Bowman capsule; (d) glomerular visceral layer.

D) (a) renal glomeruli; (b) reduced urinary space; (c) filtration barrier; (d) apparently normal macula densa; (e) whole proximal tubule.

Figure 3 Histopathologies in the liver of the control (A) and the MF treatment (B), and in the kidneys of the control (C) and the MF treatment (B) 

Histopathological analysis of the kidneys (Figure 3C and D) examined the glomeruli, Bowman’s capsule, the urinary space, podocytes, the vascular and urinary poles, the filtration barrier, the proximal tubules, the Henle loop, the distal tubules, the juxtaglomerular apparatus, the collecting tubules and the renal interstitium. No micromorphological differences were apparent between the two groups since the evaluated structures showed no congestion or inflammation and their structures were complete.

Leaves from Moringa oleifera are a good source of protein and minerals. Addition of 10 % moringa flour to a broiler diet reduced production parameter values during the study period. Differences in protein and enzyme levels were detected although no visible toxic effects were apparent, which was confirmed in the histopathological studies. The higher GGT and ALP activity levels in the moringa flour treatment may be due to certain inflammatory processes in the bile ducts which occurred in both groups and were caused by factors other than consumption of moringa and feed. Establishing the proper inclusion levels of moringa leaf in poultry diets requires further research to compare with the present results.

The research reported here was financially supported by the INIFAP through the project “Potencial agronómico, nutricional y nutracéutico de la moringa (Moringa oleífera) y usos alternativos de la hoja y la pasta de la semilla” (No. Preci 11163719248). MKFE received a master’s scholarship from the CONACYT.

Literatura citada

1. SAGARPA. Pollos, gallinas y avicultura en México 2017, http://www.gob.mx/sagarpa/articulos/pollos-gallinas-y-la-avicultura-en-mexico. [ Links ]

2. Cuca MG, Ávila EG. Fuente de energía y proteínas para la alimentación de las aves. Ciencia Vet 1978; 2:325-358. [ Links ]

3. Romero-Lara ML. Producción avícola a pequeña escala. Ficha 12. Colegio de Posgraduados. SAGARPA, Subsecretaria de Desarrollo Rural. https://docplayer.es/5952656-Produccion-avicola-a-pequena-escala.htmlLinks ]

4. Melesse A, Getye Y, Berihun K, Banerjee S. Effect of feeding graded levels of Moringa stenopetala leaf meal on growth performance, carcass traits y some serum biochemical parameters of Koekoek chickens. Livest Sci 2013;157:498-505. [ Links ]

5. Sarwatt S. Substituting sunflower seed-cake with Moringa oleifera leaves as supplemental goat feed in Tanzania. Agrofor Syst 2002;56(3):241-247. [ Links ]

6. Jongrungruangchok SBS, Songsak T. Nutrients y minerals content of eleven different samples of Moringa oleifera cultivated in Thailand. J Health Res 2010;24(3):123-127. [ Links ]

7. Olson ME, Fahey JW, Moringa oleifera: Un árbol multiusos para las zonas tropicales secas. Rev Mex Biodiv 2011;82:1071-1082. [ Links ]

8. Yameogo CW, Bengaly MD, Savadogo A, Nikiema PA, Traore SA, Determination of chemical composition y nutritional values Moringa oleifera leaves. Pak J Nutr 2011;10:264-268. [ Links ]

9. Guzmán-Maldonado SH, Zamarripa-Colmenares A, Hernández-Duran LG, Calidad nutrimental y nutraceutica de hoja de moringa proveniente de árboles de diferente altura. REMEXA 2015;6:317-330. [ Links ]

10. Devaraj VC, Asad M, Prasad S, Effect of leaves y fruits of Moringla oleifera on gastric y duodenal ulcers. Pharmaceu Biol 2007;45:332-338. [ Links ]

11. Chumarka P, Khunawat P, Sanvarinda Y, Phornchirasilp S, Morales NP, Phivthong-Ngam L, et al. The in vitro and ex vivo antioxidant properties, hypolipidaemic and antitherosclerotic activities of water extract fo Moringa oleifera Lam. leaves. J Ethnoparmacol 2008;116:439-446. [ Links ]

12. Sun B, Zhang Y, Ding M, Xi Q, Liu G, Li Y, et al. Effects of Moringa oleifera leaves as a substitute for alfalfa meal on nutrient digestibility, growth performance, carcass trait, meat quality, antioxidant capacity and biochemical parameters of rabbits [en prensa]. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr2017, doi: 10.1111/jpn.12678. [ Links ]

13. Babiker EE, Al Juhaimi F, Ghafoor K, Mohamed HE, Abdoun KA, Effect of partial replacement of alfalfa hay with Moringa species leaves on milk yield and composition of Najdi ewes. Trop Anim Health Prod 2016;48(7):1427-1433. [ Links ]

14. Mendieta-Araica B, Spörndly E, Reyes-Sánchez N, Spörndly R, Feeding Moringa oleifera fresh or ensiled to dairy cows--effects on milk yield and milk flavor. Trop Anim Health Prod 2011;43(5):1039-1047. [ Links ]

15. Khan I, Zaneb H, Masood S, Yousaf MS, Rehman HF, Rehman H, Effect of Moringa oleifera leaf powder supplementation on growth performance and intestinal morphology in broiler chickens. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl)2017;(Suppl 1):114-121. [ Links ]

16. Ayssiwede, SB. Effects of Moringa oleifera (Lam) leaves meal incorporation in diets on growth performances, carcass characteristics y economics results of growing indigenous Senegal chickens. Pak J Nutr 2011;10(12):1132-1145. [ Links ]

17. Nkukwana TT, Muchenje V, Masika PJ, Pieterse E, Hoffman LC, Dzama K, Proximate composition and variation in colour, drip loss and pH of breast meat from broilers supplemented with Moringa oleifera leaf meal over time. Anim Prod Sci 2016;56(7):1208-1216. [ Links ]

18. Nkukwana TT, Muchenje V, Masika PJ, Hoffman LC, Dzama K, The effect of Moringa oleifera leaf meal supplementation on tibia strength, morphology y inorganic content of broiler chickens. South African J Anim Sci 2014; 44:228-239. [ Links ]

19. Liaqat S, Mahmood S, Ahmad S, Kamran Z, Koutoulis KC, Replacement of canola meal with Moringa oleifera leaf powder affects performance and immune response in broilers. J App Poultry Res 2016;25(3):352-358. [ Links ]

20. National Research Council. Subcommittee on Poultry Nutrition, Committee on Animal Nutrition, Board on Agriculture. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, Ninth Revised Edition. 1994. [ Links ]

21. AOAC. Official methods of analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists International: Vitamins and other nutrients. 17th ed. Gaithersburg, USA: Hoerwitz W ed.; 2000. [ Links ]

22. Jones JB, Case VW. Sampling, handling, and analyzing plant tissue samples In: Westerman RL editor. Soil testing and plant analysis. Book Series 3, Soil Sci Soc Am. Madison, Wisconsin, USA. 1990:389-427. [ Links ]

23. Tsao R, Yang R, Young JC, Zhu H, Polyphenolic profiles in eight apple cultivars using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). J Agric Food Chem 2003;51:6347-6353. [ Links ]

24. Singleton VL, Orthofer R, Lamuela-Raventos RM, Analysis of total phenols and other oxidation substrates and antioxidants by means of folin-ciocalteu reagent. Methods Enzymol 1999;299:152-178. [ Links ]

25. Deshpande SS, Cheryan M, Evaluation of vanillin assay for tannin analysis of dry beans. J Food Sci 1985;50:905-910. [ Links ]

26. Quintana JA. Avitecnia: manejo de las aves domésticas más comunes. 4ta ed. Ciudad de Mexico, Mx: Trillas; 2011. [ Links ]

27. Burtis CA, Ashwood ER. Clinical chemistry. Philadelphia, USA: Saunders WB; 1999. [ Links ]

28. McElroy DA, Prophet EB, Mills B, Arrington JB, Sobin LH. Laboratory methods. In Histotechnology. Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, American Registry of Pathology.Washington, DC: 1994. [ Links ]

29. Statiscal Analysis System (SAS) . General Linear Models (GLM). North Caroline State Universality, Raleigh, North Caroline, USA: 2001. [ Links ]

30. Makkar HPS, Becker K. Nutrients and antiquality factors in different morphological parts of the Moringa oleifera tree. J Agric Food Sci 1997;128:311-322. [ Links ]

31. Ross B, Suplemento de nutrición del pollo de engorda. http://es.aviagen.com/assets/Tech_Center/BB_Foreign_Language_Docs/Spanish_TechDocs/RossBroilerHandbook2014-ES.pdf. [ Links ]

32. Nagórna-Stasiak B, Lazuga-Adamczyk A. The effect of iron on metabolism of vitamin C in chickens. Arch Vet Pol 1994;34(1-2):99-106. [ Links ]

33. Hassan IAG, Elzubeir EA, Tinay AH. Growth and apparent absorption of minerals in broiler chicks fed diets with low and high tannin contents. Trop Anim Health Prod 2003;35:189-196. [ Links ]

34. Meluzzi A, Primiceri G, Giordani R, Fabris G. Determination of blood constituents reference values in broilers. Poult Sci 1992;71:337-345. [ Links ]

35. Mitruka BM, Rawnsley HM. Clinical biochemical and hematological reference values in normal experimental animals. 1rst ed. New York, USA: Masson Publishing USA Inc.; 1997. [ Links ]

36. Landeros P, Reyes W, De Lucas E, Albarrán E, López Y, Quezada T. Evaluación de dos adsorbentes (manano oligosacáridos y clinoptilolita) en dietas de pollos de engorde contaminadas con fumonisina B1. Rev Salud Anim 2008;30:50-58. [ Links ]

37. Werner LL, Laboratory medicine - Avian and exotic pets. Vet Clin Pathol 2001;30(1):2-46. [ Links ]

38. Thrall MA, Weise G, Allison RW, Campbell TW. Clinical chemistry of birds. In: Thrall MA editor. Veterinary hematology and clinical chemistry. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, Lippincott, USA: Wiley-Blackwell; 2004:479-492. [ Links ]

39. Fernandez A, Verde MT, Gascon M, Ramos J, Gomez J, Luco DF, et al. Variations of clinical biocheT1mical parameters of laying hens y broiler chickens fed aflatoxin‐containing feed. Avian Pathol 1994;23:37-47. [ Links ]

40. Lumeij JT. Avian clinical biochemistry. In: Kaneko JJ, Harvey JW, Bruss ML editors. Clinical biochemistry of domestic animals. 5th ed. San Diego, California, USA: Academic Press; 1995:308-335. [ Links ]

41. Fudge AM. Avian liver and gastrointestinal testing. In: Fudge AM editor. Laboratory Medicine - Avian and Exotic Pets. 1rst ed. St. Louis, Missouri, USA: WB Saunders Co; 2000:47-55. [ Links ]

Received: August 14, 2017; Accepted: February 20, 2018

Creative Commons License Este es un artículo publicado en acceso abierto bajo una licencia Creative Commons