SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.7 número4Tipología y caracterización de apicultores del estado de Morelos, MéxicoAcumulación estacional de biomasa aérea de alfalfa Var. Oaxaca criolla (Medicago sativa L.) índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Revista mexicana de ciencias pecuarias

versión On-line ISSN 2448-6698versión impresa ISSN 2007-1124

Rev. mex. de cienc. pecuarias vol.7 no.4 Mérida oct./dic. 2016

 

Articles

Characterization of milk and quality classification by Cluster analysis in dual purpose systems

José Manuel Juárez-Barrientosa 

Pablo Díaz-Riveraa 

Jesús Rodríguez-Mirandab 

Cecilia E. Martínez-Sánchezb 

Betsabé Hernández-Santosb 

Emmanuel Ramírez-Riveraa 

Juan G. Torruco-Ucob 

Erasmo Herman-Larab  * 

a Colegio de Postgraduados, Campus Veracruz. Veracruz, Veracruz, México.

b Instituto Tecnológico de Tuxtepec. Av. Dr. Víctor Bravo A. s/n. 68300 Tuxtepec, Oaxaca, México. Tel: (287) 875 1044

Abstract:

Due to lack information about the milk quality and heterogeneity in dual purpose systems in the Mexican tropics, training is not directed to groups where is required. Therefore, the aim of this study was to characterize the milk of these systems compared to the reference standards and to establish the relationship with management practices. Addition to proposing a methodology to identify groups and production units that require intervention actions. Physicochemical and microbiological composition of 192 raw milk samples from different production units in seven locations were evaluated. The effect of management practices on the characteristics of milk by analysis of variance was determined. A cluster analysis was applied for grouping the samples based on the fat content, nonfat solids, titratable acidity and cryoscopy. A 65 % of the samples showed values out of specification (solid, density and cryoscopy, suggesting an adulterated milk with water). The use of oxytocin, milking type, breed, production system and supplementation affected (P<0.05) the yield and characteristics of the milk. Through Cluster analysis five quality groups were identified. Groups of excellent and good quality showed values within or close to the reference standards in all parameters evaluated. The groups of poor, bad and very bad quality (47 %) had high values of cryoscopy and low solids content. Through the proposed methodology is expected to facilitate the directed intervention from government and private agencies to solve the problems identified, avoiding the waste of supports.

Key words: Cluster analysis; Milk quality; Dual purpose system

Introduction

The dual purpose system (DP) in the Mexican tropic produce more than 18 % of the national milk production1 and is characterized by its heterogeneity at the structural, technological and management level2, resulting in strong differences among milk production units, even in the same area3 causing variability in the milk characteristics4. Currently, in the district’s Rural Development 008, Veracruz, Mexico (DDR 008); formed by the municipalities of Cosamaloapan, Chacaltianguis, Otatitlán, Tlacojalpan, Tuxtilla, Tres Valles, Carlos A. Carrillo, Amatitlán, Ixtamatlahuacan, Tlacotalpan, Tierra Blanca and Acula5, there is no information on the characteristics and quality of the milk produced compared to national and international standards. Therefore, capacitation programs are indiscriminately aimed, without taking into account the specific needs of producers.

On the other hand, studies on the milk characteristics and its relationship with management in different parts of the world6-8 propose a univariate statistical treatment which does not allow the identification of problematic groups, hampering the implementation of strategies. However, there are multivariate statistical techniques such as the cluster analysis, which allows to classify data in homogeneous groups and differentiate them based on heterogeneity among groups9. This classification generates information that facilitates the identification of specific groups and the orientation of preventive or corrective measures with the aim of improving the milk quality. Based on this, the objectives of this research were: a) Knowing the characteristics of physicochemical and microbiological milk produced in seven towns of the DDR 008, compared with national and international standards and their relationship with management practices and b) Create a milk classification based on the quality that allows identifying the groups that require support.

Material and methods

Milk sampling

It was a stratified sampling with proportional allocation, taking into account the number of production units (PU) in each municipality, and as reference variable the number of cows by PU. Samples (n= 198 ) of raw milk from different PU locations were taken: Tierra Blanca (114), Tres Valles (6), Carlos A. Carrillo (18), Laguna de lagarto (30), Cosamaloapan (6), Acula (12) and Ixmatlahuacan (12), belonging to the DDR 008 Cd. Alemán, Veracruz, México, which together provide 90.5 % of the milk production in the district10. Samples were taken from the storage tanks in 60 ± 10 min, after milking and moved in a cooler box at 4 ± 1 °C for analysis in a time span of 3 ± 1 h11.

Physicochemical characteristics

Fat content (FT), protein (PR), lactose (LA) and nonfat solids (NFS), were evaluated. Additionally, density (DE) and cryoscopy (CR) by ultrasound using a scanner Lactoscan S (Milkotronic Ltd, 4 Narodni Buditeli str. 8900 Nova Zagora, Bulgaria) previously calibrated and validated, presenting an average error of 0.025% with determinations made in accordance with the AOAC12.

Contamination indicators groups

A mixture of milk (10 mL) and 90 mL of sterile peptone solution was placed in a homogenizer (Stomacher®, model 400 circulator Seward Limited, UK) for a minute at 265 rpm. Dilutions of 10-1, 10-2 and 10-3 were prepared to assess the total bacterial count (TBC) and total coliform counts (TCC)12. Values obtained in colony forming units per milliliter (cfu/mL) were transformed into log10 scale13 to be used for further analysis. Titratable acidity (TA) was reported as the average value in grams of lactic acid per liter of milk (g/L)14.

Management practices

In each PU a questionnaire was applied to obtain information on the production system (PS), predominantly breed, type of milking, supplementation practices, use of oxytocin and milk yield (L·cow-1).

Statistical analysis

A univariate analysis was performed to describe management practices and milk characteristics. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) were applied to determine effects of PS, breed, type of milking, supplementation and use of oxytocin on milk characteristics and milk yield. Cluster analysis served to group milk based on their quality from FT, NFS, CR and TA variables, establishing as reference the Euclidian distance, using the full linkage algorithm. The test of least significant difference of the Fisher procedure established the difference among the identified groups to a significance level of 5%. Statistics statistical package version 7.0 was used.

Results

Physicochemical characteristics

The contrast of results with standard references it shows in Table 1. The FT content showed a high variability with an average of 34.8 g/L, which accomplished the national standard NOM-155-SCFI-2012(14-) and the international standard signed by FAO15. The average values of PR (29.5 g/L), LA (41.9 g/L), NFS (79.2 g/L), CR (- 0.490 °C) and DE (1027.45 g/L) did not meet the minimum intervals of the standard NOM-155-SCFI-201214 and those established by FAO15, except the PR that met the minimum international standard average.

Table 1 Physicochemical quality, spoilage indicators groups of milk and comparison with national and international standards 

1NOM-155-SCFI-2012, 2Calderón et al. (2006), 3NMX-F-700-COFOCALEC-2004, 4PMO, 1995, 5Draaiyer et al. (2009). The results represent the average of three determinations ± standard deviation

Contamination indicators groups

Table 1 presents the results of bacterial counts, TA and comparison with reference standards. The TBC (1.08 x 104 cfu/mL) and TCC (5.80 x 102 cfu/mL) met with regulatory values. However, there was a wide variability in TCC, reaching 28 % of the samples above the standards set out in the standard NOM-155-SCFI-201214. The average value of TA complied with the values set by the standard NOM-155-SCFI-2012 (14) and FAO15, but in the interval (0.67 to 1.75 g/L) it was observed that 2 % of the samples had values above those established by Mexican standards.

Management practices and relationship with the characteristics of the milk

Breed crosses present in the PU were Swiss x Zebu (61 %), Holstein x Zebu (9.4 %), Zebu (7.8 %) and crosses not defined (22 %). The herd was handled under a grazing system (87. 5 %) and semi-stabled (12.5 %). Milking was carried out manually (94 %), and less frequently in a mechanical manner (6 %). In 20.5 % of cases, cows receive balanced feed supplementation. The milk ejection was induced: without using oxytocin (47 %), with partial use, only in hard milking cows (30 %) and application to the entire dairy herd (23 %). The milking herd averaged 34 cows, with an average yield of 4.95 L·cow-1.

The results of the ANOVA (Tables 2 and 3) showed that in the UP where the Holstein x Zebu crossing dominated, yield increased with a lower content of FT and PR in milk and CR elevated values (P<0.05). Type of milking affected (P<0.05) bacterial counts, since the milk obtained by mechanical milking presented counts and TA lower than those by manual milking did. Furthermore, mechanical milking apparently increases the yield; however, the two-way ANOVA revealed that it relates more to a mix of factors, as supplementation and oxytocin application. Application of oxytocin in the entire herd increased (P<0.05) the yield when compared to the partial or no use of, in relation with a low content of solids.

Table 2 Effect of management practices on the physicochemical milk quality and productive yield 

ZE= Zebu. SZ= Swiss x Zebu, UD= Undefined breed, HZ= Holstein x Zebu. HAN= Hand, MEC= Mechanic. NO= Not apply, PAR= Partial application, TOT= Total application. NO= Not supplement, YES= Supplement. GR= Grazing, SES= Semi-stabled.

ab Values with different superscripts within the same column differ (P<0.05).

Table 3 Effect of management practices on the spoilage indicators groups of milk 

TBC= Total bacterial count; TCC= Total coliform count; HA= Hand; MEC= Mechanic. GR= Grazing. SES= Semi-stabled.

ab Values with different superscript within the same column differ (P<0.05).

The PS based on grazing was related to elevated values of NFS, PR, LA, DE and lower values of CR, when compared with the semi-stabled system. There were no differences (P>0.05) in milk yield between both systems. Grazing-based system related to a higher bacterial load and TA (P<0.05) to that seen in milk from semi-stabled systems

Classification of milk quality

Cluster analysis allowed classifying milk samples in five groups of quality based on the variables FT, NFS, CR and TA. Dendrogram in Figure 1 shows association of PU with each group. The distance between the groups fluctuated between 3 and 39. The distance between the groups of milk from very poor quality with groups of excellent quality was 39; good quality was 33; poor quality 24 and very poor quality was 3. According to the ANOVA, differences were observed (P<0.05) among quality groups for the different variables (Figure 2). The so-called group of excellent quality, represented 14 % of the sample and presented the highest values of FT (43.60 ± 2.49 g/L), NFS (83.34 ± 1.11 g/L) and TA (1.36 g/L) and the lowest in CR (-0.520 ± 0.005 °C); this group met with the values set by the standard NOM-155-SCFI-2012 and FAO14,15. The good quality group accounted for 39 % of the sample and presented values of FT (32.57 ± 2.80 g/L) and NFS (82.13 ± 1.24 g/L) less than the excellent quality group, values of CR (-0.512 ± 0.010 °C) superiors and TA (1.39 ± 0.14 g/L) similar to that group. This group met the minimum values set out in international and national standards, with the exception of the of NFS content which was below that required by the standard NOM-155-SCFI-201214. Groups of poor (21 %), bad (3 %) and very poor quality (23 %) showed similar values of NFS (between 77.20 and 77.80 g/L) below the established standards of reference and similar high values of CR (between -0.460 and -0.480 °C). They presented values below established standards for FT (between 15 and 10 g/L), except for the group of poor quality which presented high values of FT (42.80 ± 5.30 g/L) similar to the values of the excellent quality group.

Figure 1 Dendrogram of milk samples by productive units using the complete linkage method 

abcd Values with different superscript differ (P<0.05).

Figure 2 Characteristics of groups formed based on milk quality 

Discussion

Physicochemical characteristics

The FT content was similar to the interval reported in tropical zones (32.6 to 34.5 g/L)16 and can be linked to the breed pattern Bos taurus x Bos indicus6. The content of PR, LA and NFS was lower than the range reported in other studies16,17. This low solids content, often is related to a dilution effect 4 by the high-performance caused by the B. Taurus component7. However, the content of solids found in conjunction with the CR values superior to -0.530 °C and DE below 1,028 g/L, reveal practices of adulteration by addition of water6, which has serious implications for the processing industry and generates risks to health18.

Contamination indicators groups

TBC values were similar to those observed in another study, which suggest good hygiene milking practices19. Twenty eight (28) percent of samples out of the norm in TCC reflect failures in post milking management and lack of the elimination of milk or residual water from the tanks. The values found in the analyzed milk contamination indicators groups guaranteed an efficient pasteurization process13, but it does not endorse their safety, so the consumption of milk and unpasteurized products represents a health risk for the possible presence of pathogenic bacteria20.

Management practices and relationship with the characteristics of the milk

Yield increase related to the Holstein x Zebu crossing has been reported previously21 and in this study was also related with a low content of solids (Table 2), however, the CR and DE values are more related to adulteration practices than to physiological factors22. Milk yield increased with the use of oxytocin. It has been observed previously, and is attributed to a greater alveolar contraction of the myoepithelial cells, moving the milk to the cavities available for ejection23. The use of oxytocin increases milk production, but must take into account the low solids content which compromises its quality for being processed24; a better option would be the supplementation of milking cows, which increases milk yield, from 4.80 to 5.50 L·cow-1, without affecting (P>0.05) the solids content.

The effect of mechanical milking on the bacterial count has been reported25, but it is necessary to emphasize that cleaning of the milking equipment with detergents is essential to avoid the milk residues4 that relate to contamination by coliforms26. PS of grazing with high bacterial counts was related to the lack of milking parlous, since cows must be milked in open lots, which increases the chances of environmental contamination25.

Classification of milk quality

Excellent and good quality groups (53 % of the sample) met the values required by reference standards, so actions should focus on increasing the level of technology implemented in the PU, which is related to efficiency and competitiveness27. Good quality group failed to meet the minimum value of NFS in accordance with NOM-155-SCFI-2012. This problem could be related to small amounts of residual water28 and can be solved through the training of operators in the milking and storage procedures.

The problematic groups named as poor, bad, and very poor quality (47 % of the sample) presented low NFS and high CR values. The adequate actions for these groups should be to satisfy the demands of nutrients from the dairy herd, taking into account the variability in the availability of forage in tropical conditions21 and that the nutritional aspect is a key component to improve production of dual purpose systems29. Another important aspect is the awareness by the producers, that the intentional addition of water to the milk represents a fraud18.

Conclusions and implications

The milk produced in the DDR 008 presented a low solids content, as 65 % of samples did not meet the minimum value of protein, lactose and nonfat solids. The high cryoscopy and low density values indicate adulteration by addition of water. Contamination indicators groups show that 28 % of the samples presented high CCT values (5.80 x 102), which indicates that, through the process of pasteurization, it will be possible to obtain a good quality milk with microbiological values within the reference norms. The information showed that there is a relationship between supplementation, yield and physico-chemical characteristics of milk, being possible to increase performance up to 20 % without affecting the content of solids. It was possible to identify groups and the PU to shape them and requiring intervention actions to improve the milk quality. Through this methodology, it expects that interventions by governmental and private institutions arise based on reality to avoid resources waste.

Literatura citada

1. Monforte JM, Arjona GR, González JM. Los sistemas de doble propósito y los desafíos en los climas tropicales de México. Arch Latinoam Prod Anim 2006;14(3):105-114. [ Links ]

2. Vilaboa-Arroniz J, Díaz-Rivera P, Ruiz-Rosado O, Platas-Rosado DE, González-Muñoz S, Juárez-Lagunes F. Caracterización socioeconómica y tecnológica de los agroecosistemas con bovinos de doble propósito de la región del Papaloapan, Veracruz, México. Trop Subtrop Agroecosyst 2009;10(1):53-62. [ Links ]

3. Romo BCE, Valdivia FAG, Carranza TRG, Cámara CJ, Zavala AMP, Flores AE, Espinosa GJA. Brechas de rentabilidad económica en pequeñas unidades de producción de leche en el altiplano central mexicano. Rev Mex Cienc Pecu 2014;5(3):273-290. [ Links ]

4. Sraïri MT, Benhouda H, Kuper M, Le GPY. Effect of cattle management practices on raw milk quality on farms operating in a two-stage dairy chain. Trop Anim Health Prod 2009;41(2):259-272. [ Links ]

5. Red Comunitaria Vasconcelos. Manual por regiones: Distrito de Desarrollo Rural 08 Cd. Alemán. Departamento de Gestión Educativa. Xalapa, Veracruz, México. 2009. [ Links ]

6. Calderón A, García F, Martínez G. Indicadores de calidad de leches crudas en diferentes regiones de Colombia. Rev MVZ Córdoba 2006;11(1):725-737. [ Links ]

7. De Marchi M, Bittante G, Dal ZR, Dalvit C, Cassandro M. Effect of Holstein Friesian and Brown Swiss breeds on quality of milk and cheese. J Dairy Sci 2008;91(10):4092-4102. [ Links ]

8. Álvarez-Fuentes G, Herrera-Haro JG, Alonso-Bastida G, Barreras-Serrano A. Calidad de la leche cruda en unidades de producción familiar del sur de Ciudad de México. Arch Med Vet 2012;44(3):237-242. [ Links ]

9. Pappas CS, Tarantilis PA, Moschopoulou E, Moatsou G, Kandarakis I, Polissiou MG. Identification and differentiation of goat and sheep milk based on diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy (DRIFTS) using cluster analysis. Food Chem 2008;106(3):1271-1277. [ Links ]

10. INEGI: Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía. Cría y explotación de animales en Veracruz de Ignacio de la Llave. Censo Agropecuario 2007. México 2013. [ Links ]

11. Secretaría de Salud. NOM-109-SSA1-1994, Bienes y Servicios. Procedimiento para la toma, manejo y transporte de muestras de alimentos para su análisis microbiológico. México 2014. [ Links ]

12. AOAC. Official methods of analysis. 17th ed. Arlington, VA, USA: Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 2005. [ Links ]

13. Pantoja JCF, Reinemann DJ, Ruegg PL. Associations among milk quality indicators in raw bulk milk. J Dairy Sci 2009;92(10):4978-4987. [ Links ]

14. Secretaría de Economía. NOM-155-SCFI-2012. Leche, formula láctea y producto lácteo combinado, especificaciones fisicoquímicas, información comercial y métodos de prueba. México. 2011. [ Links ]

15. Draaiyer J, Dugdill B, Bennett A, Mounsey J. Milk testing and payment systems. In: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) editor. A practical guide to assist milk producer groups. Roma, Italia: FAO; 2009:13-56. http://www.fao.org/docrep/012/i0980e/i0980e00.htm . Accessed Dic 13, 2014. [ Links ]

16. Bernal ML, Rojas GM, Vázquez FC, Espinoza OA, Estrada FJ, Castelán OO. Determinación de la calidad fisicoquímica de la leche cruda producida en sistemas campesinos en dos regiones del Estado de México. Vet Méx 2007;38(4):395-407. [ Links ]

17. Briñez WJ, Valbuena E, Castro G, Tovar A, Ruiz-Ramírez J. Algunos parámetros de composición y calidad en leche Cruda de vacas doble propósito en el municipio Machiques de Perijá Estado Zulia, Venezuela. Rev Cient-Fac Cien V 2008;18(5):607-617. [ Links ]

18. Das S, Sivaramakrishna M, Biswas K, Goswami B. Performance study of a constant phase angle based impedance sensor to detect milk adulteration. Sensor Actuat A-Phys 2011;167(2):273-278. [ Links ]

19. D’amico DJ, Donnelly CW. Microbiological quality of raw milk used for small-scale artisan cheese production in Vermont: effect of farm characteristics and practices. J Dairy Sci 2010;93(1):134-147. [ Links ]

20. Claeys WL, Cardoen S, Daube G, De Block J, Dewettinck K, Dierick K, et al. Raw or heated cow milk consumption: Review of risks and benefits. Food Control 2013;31(1):251-262. [ Links ]

21. Osorio MM, Segura JC. Environmental and breed effects on test day milk yields of dual-purpose crossbred cows under tropical conditions of Mexico. J Appl Anim Res 2004;25(2):125-128. [ Links ]

22. Neville CM, Jensen RG. The physical properties of human and bovine milks. In: Jensen RG editor. Handbook of milk composition. San Diego, USA: Academic Press; 1995:82-85. [ Links ]

23. Bruckmaier RM, Macuhova J, Meyer HHD. Specific aspects of milk ejection in robotic milking: a review. Lives Prod Sci 2001;72(1):169-176. [ Links ]

24. Glantz M, Lindmark M, H, Stålhammar H, Bårström LO, Fröjelin M, Knutsson A, Teluk C, Paulsson M. Effects of animal selection on milk composition and processability. J Dairy Sci 2009;92(9):4589-4603. [ Links ]

25. Mhone TA, Matope G, Saidi PT. Aerobic bacterial, coliform, Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus counts of raw and processed milk from selected smallholder dairy farms of Zimbabwe. Int J Food Microbiol 2011;151(2):223-228. [ Links ]

26. Pantoja JCF, Reinemann DJ, Ruegg PL. Factors associated with coliform count in unpasteurized bulk milk. J Dairy Sci 2011;94(6):2680-2691. [ Links ]

27. Atzori AS, Tedeschi LO, Cannas A. A multivariate and stochastic approach to identify key variables to rank dairy farms on profitability. J Dairy Sci 2013;96(5):3378-3387. [ Links ]

28. Sánchez A, Sierra D, Luengo C, Corrales JC, De La Fe C, Morales CT, Gonzalo C. Evaluation of the MilkoScan FT 6000 milk analyzer for determining the freezing point of goat’s milk under different analytical conditions. J Dairy Sci 2007;90(7):3153-3161. [ Links ]

29. Reynoso-Campos O, Fox DG, Blake RW, Barry MC, Tedeschi LO, Nicholson CF, Oltenacu PA. Predicting nutritional requirements and lactation performance of dual-purpose cows using a dynamic model. Agr Syst 2004;80(1):67-83. [ Links ]

Received: March 27, 2015; Accepted: August 24, 2015

Creative Commons License Este es un artículo publicado en acceso abierto bajo una licencia Creative Commons