SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.7 número3Desarrollo del eje reproductivo endocrino en corderos de peloAnálisis de variables morfológicas de pavos de traspatio mexicanos (Meleagris gallopavo gallopavo) índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Revista mexicana de ciencias pecuarias

versión On-line ISSN 2448-6698versión impresa ISSN 2007-1124

Rev. mex. de cienc. pecuarias vol.7 no.3 Mérida jul./sep. 2016

 

Bibliographic Revisions

Artificial weaning in sheep: stress response and animal welfare. Review

Aline Freitas-de-Meloa 

Rodolfo Ungerfeldb 

a Departamento de Biología Molecular y Celular, Universidad de la República, Lasplaces 1620, Montevideo (11600), Uruguay, tel.: (598) 26221195, correo electrónico: alinefreitasdemelo@hotmail.com. Correspondencia al primer autor.

b Departamento de Fisiología, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de la República, Lasplaces, Uruguay.


Abstract

The establishment of ewe-lamb bond occurs at lambing, and is modified along the lactation period until natural weaning. Artificial weaning is a management commonly used in sheep productive systems commonly performed before natural weaning. Artificial weaning provokes strong behavioral and physiological responses indicative of stress, and is considered as one of the most stressful situations in the life of the animal. Those responses negatively affect animal health and welfare, and the productive results. Therefore, it is important to elucidate which factors affect those responses, and to develop strategies to decreases the negative response. This review summarizes the available information on the establishment of ewe-lamb bonding, and how this bond evolves during the lactation period until natural weaning. Moreover, it describes the behavioral and physiological stress responses to artificial weaning, and the main factors that affect those responses at physiological, behavioral and productive levels. Finally, it presents information on some strategies available to decrease the negative effects of artificial weaning. Includes original information on the influence of quantitative and qualitative changes of pasture allowance in extensive sheep production systems and the stress responses of lambs to weaning; and handlings that potentially may be applied to decrease the stress response to artificial weaning. It suggests whether is room to study and to develop practical alternatives to modulate the stress response to weaning.

Key words: Suckling; Maternal behavior; Lambs; Lactation; Ovine

Resumen

El vínculo oveja-cordero se establece al parto y cambia a lo largo del periodo de lactación hasta el destete natural. El destete artificial es un manejo frecuentemente utilizado en los diferentes tipos de sistemas de producción ovina, que es realizado más tempranamente que el destete natural. Es uno de los eventos más estresantes en la vida del animal, ya que genera cambios fisiológicos y de comportamiento fuertemente indicadores de estrés, pudiendo afectar negativamente la salud y el bienestar animal tanto de ovejas como de corderos, así como los resultados productivos. La presente revisión sintetiza y analiza información sobre cómo se establece el vínculo madre-cría, el desarrollo del mismo durante el período de lactación y el proceso de destete natural, así como los cambios que se producen cuando el destete se adelanta artificialmente. Además, se describe la respuesta generada por el destete artificial y qué factores la afectan, a nivel fisiológico, de comportamiento y productivo. Por último, se presenta la información existente sobre posibles estrategias que permitan minimizar los efectos negativos del estrés de destete artificial. Se agrega información original sobre cómo la variación cualitativa y cuantitativa de la oferta de pastura en los sistemas extensivos de producción ovino pueden afectar la respuesta de destete de los corderos, y manejos con potencialidad práctica que pueden mitigar la respuesta al destete artificial. Se especifican aspectos en los que existe necesidad de investigación para mejorar la comprensión y desarrollar alternativas sobre cómo modular la respuesta de estrés al destete.

Palabras clave: Amamantamiento; Comportamiento maternal; Corderos; Lactación; Ovinos

Sheep are characterized by a highly selective mother-lamb bonding, which is set immediately after lambing1. The intensity of the bond changes throughout the lactation period, as the process of natural weaning advances and thus, the lamb gains independence2. Artificial weaning is performed earlier, and is characterized by the complete replacement of suckling by artificial rearing with milk, or milk substitution by solid food2,3,4. This management implies the separation of ewe and her lamb, in addition to nutritional changes to the lamb, and changes of the physical (commonly the lambs and sheep are taken to different paddocks) and social environments (an environment that was made up of sheep and lambs, will be formed by only lambs or ewes)2. Age of artificial weaning varies according to the productive objective, being done early (0-2 d) in dairy sheep4, and according to our knowledge between 60 and 150 d in extensive systems aimed at meat and wool production.

Weaning generates a stress response in ewes and their lambs that produces physiological changes and behavior. The intensity of the response to artificial weaning, and the consequences on production and welfare of the animals vary according to the intensity of the bond with the mother during the weaning period, the age of lambs, the sex of the offspring, breed and feeding of ewes during pregnancy and lactation5,6,7. There is information of the productive response and the negative effects produced by different types of weaning: abrupt, progressive, in stages, and through fencelines (placement of sheep and lambs, separated by a fence during several days before the final separation)6,8,9,10. According to a series of studies, the abrupt weaning, despite being the most widely used weaning together with fenceline weaning, seem to be the systems that generate greater stress responses to weaning. In some studies management systems prior to weaning to decrease the stress response in sheep have been assessed.

While the stress of animals is evident at the field level, the scientific literature is still scarce and scattered. This review summarizes information about the physiological changes and behavioral responses to weaning, from both ewes and lambs, and the negative impact that this has on animal welfare and productive results. In turn, the information available on the main factors influencing the stress response to weaning is summarized, and some alternative management to decrease the negative effects are analyzed.

Establishment of the mother-lamb bond

The link between the ewe and the lamb is displayed immediately lambing. Maternal behavior is induced by endocrine changes that occur in ewes during the peripartum period, mainly the decrease in the progesterone (P4) concentration and the increase on estrogen and oxytocin concentrations11,12. In response to these changes, and only in this period, the ewe is strongly attracted to the amniotic fluid that surrounds the lamb13. Cleaning of the lamb during the first 20 to 30 min helps the mother to recognize her offspring14. After 60 to 120 min, if the mother receives a different offspring from her own or if she has not previously recognized her lamb, she rejects it14. The ewe only directs her maternal behavior toward the lambs that were identified as their own offspring during the first postpartum minutes15. Therefore, to keep the bond it is important that the lamb and the mother can identify each other among other animals in the group. Smell of the offspring is important for the memory of the mother, but the mother also recognizes her lamb through hearing and vision16.

The first behaviors displayed by the lambs after birth lead to reach the teat and suckle13. If the mother accepts her offspring to suckle means that she has recognized it and accepted as her own17. Lambs also recognizes their mother through sensory mechanisms, primarily hearing and vision18, which increases the chances of survive19. During the immediate postpartum period the mother-lamb bond is characterized by a high frequency of suckling and a strong tendency to be in physical proximity during the day20,21. Although temporary separations of short duration during this period do not have consequences on the later mother-lamb bond13, they can generate transient behavior changes in the mother. For example, ewes can move away from their lamb when humans are present22.

Natural weaning

Natural weaning is characterized by the replacement of milk by solid food and the acquisition of social independence of the lamb2. During the first 2 wk of the life, ewes allow lambs to suckle every time they require it and gradually, as the lactation proceeds, rejection is more frequent23. During the period of lactation and the lamb growth, suckling frequency decreases at time that the physical distance between the ewe and lamb increase20,21. At the same time, the lamb is familiarized and adapted to the consumption of solid food2. The decrease of the suckling frequency is also associated with rumen development24. For example, in Santa Inés lambs, rumen development is achieved when lambs reach approximately 15 kg of weight25, allowing the lamb to change the diet.

The production of ewes’ milk is one of the main factors that influence the age of the natural weaning of their lambs26. Age of natural weaning may also vary according to the nutritional status of the ewes; one of the factors that mostly affect is mother’s milk production27. Suckling ends with the weaning of the lamb, about 4 to 5 mo of age26.

Artificial weaning

Artificial weaning is the forced end of suckling, the end of milk supply by the ewes to their lambs, and usually involves physical separation, and therefore the loss of the mother 2,3,4. Artificial weaning is commonly applied in sheep production systems, since it improves the reproductive and productive results. In meat and wool sheep production, weaning is done to improve body condition and weight, since they influence positively the conception rates, prolificacy and weight of lambs at birth and at weaning28,29. In sheep milk production systems artificial weaning is done early to obtain more milk, and is associated with the artificial rearing of lambs with dairy substitutes(4).

Artificial weaning time varies depending on the purpose of each sheep farm, and depends on age, weight and ability of the lamb to eat solid food4. According to the productive purpose, lambs can be weaned from 24 h postpartum until the age of their natural weaning. Dairy farms maintain ewes and lambs together for 24 to 48 h to allow lambs to suckling colostrum, and then make an abrupt weaning4. On some farms of sheep milk, lambs continue accessing their mother during short periods of time, allowing a restricted suckling. Commonly, sheep meat and wool farmers wean their lambs between 60 to 150 d of age, but most often before 120 d, moment in which the lamb already increased the intake of solid food, and after the lactation peak that occurs in the 3rd to 4rd wk postpartum. In this case, farmers separate ewes and lambs without needing artificial rearing, making easier handling, and reducing costs.

Stress response to artificial weaning

The abrupt and complete separation of the lambs before the natural weaning age is a stressful situation for ewes and lambs, which is caused by different stressors: 1) Emotional, generated by the end of the mother-lamb bond; 2) Changes in the physical and social environment, since at least one of the two is housed in a new environment, often with other animals with which they had no previous contact; 3) End of suckling, which implies the end of the neurophysiological changes induced by suckling and 4) Nutritional change, generated by the loss of milk and its complete replacement by other food2,10,30. The response of the animal is the result of these stressors altogether, but the relative importance of each one has been poorly studied. After separation, ewes and lambs increase the frequency of behaviors related to searching the other. There is an increase in the frequency of vocalizations9 and at the same time standing and walking, as well as pacing (when animals walk again and again at a distance of 1 to 2 m parallel to the fence, modifying the direction of back and forth continuously), behavior that in lambs is exclusively associated with the loss of the mother30. The increase in the number of vocalizations and pacing are behavioral changes more closely related to the stress response to weaning. Usually these changes occur quickly, reaching their maximum frequency in few hours, and lasting 3 to 4 d. The rapid end of these behaviors could be related to their lack of effectiveness, since they generate important costs without achieving positive responses10,31. In addition, the increase breeding of the ewe and the lamb search- related behaviors, both reduce the feeding and resting time: the animals spend less time laying, grazing and ruminating after weaning10,30,32. In recently weaned lambs fed on pastures or with dairy substitutes, some lambs redirect the suckling behavior trying to suck from other lambs33.

The loss of the mother as a result of weaning is a main factor in the response of lamb’s stress. Damian et al30 compared the stress response of lambs at weaning if they were reared artificially with sheep’s milk supplied in artificial teats or reared by their mothers. At weaning and when artificial rearing ended, only the lambs who lost their mother paced, and walked and vocalized more, decreasing the time grazing. This shows that these behaviors are mainly affected by the loss of the mother, and to a lesser extent by the loss of milk suckling and the change of feeding as a whole.

Weaning also produces acute physiological changes indicators of stress in ewes and lambs, as a rapid increase in the serum concentration of cortisol34,35, which is one of the main endocrine indicators of the stress response in sheep36,37. The increase in the secretion of cortisol is associated with modulation of the immune response of the animal38, since in ruminants, it has been reported that artificial weaning impairs immune function39,40,41. Moreover, the amount of antibodies synthesized after an antigenic challenge is lower in the lambs during the postweaning than at other times 42. After weaning, there is an increase in the number of leukocytes8, and a decrease in the concentration of total proteins and globulins of the ewe10. As weaning is a stressful management that affects the immune system, the animals may be more susceptible to diseases. For example, lambs recently weaned and experimentally infected with Haemonchus contortus and Trichostrongylus colubriformis had more eggs of these parasites, lower hematocrit, and a posterior lower production of antibodies against these parasites than unweaned controls43. It has also been reported that weaning naturally increases the excretion of coccidia oocysts8,9.

Weaning also affects negatively the growth of the lambs, and if they are not artificially reared, this effect may be even greater in lambs weaned before ending the development of the rumen44,45. This delay in growth could also be explained as a consequence of the worst immune status and increased susceptibility to gastrointestinal parasites, as well as changes of behavioral indicators of stress8,30,43. In synthesis, the behavioral changes and the physiological responses have negative consequences both at production and on welfare of animals, so it is important to develop alternatives to decrease them.

Factors affecting the response to separation of the ewe and her lamb

There are many factors that can influence the intensity of the response to the separation of the ewes and their lambs, as age, sex, genetics and feeding of the sheep during pregnancy. The excitement and the frequency of vocalizations are greater after weaning lambs at 2 than at 4 mo6. The same authors observed the same behavioral changes, and a lower growth rate of the lambs when they weaned them at 13 to 16 wk46.

The effect of age at weaning on the growth of the lambs has been widely studied44,45,47,48. In general, the rate of growth is more affected when weaning is performed earlier, which is probably due to a slower adaptation to solid food intake in younger lambs49. In addition, mortality rates at 210 d were greater in lambs weaned at 45 d than at 60 and 75 d50. These results indicate that at a younger age, when the ewe-lamb bond is stronger, and lambs have a greater social and nutritional dependence, the negative effects of weaning on the lambs’ welfare are greater.

It has also been determined that female lambs have stronger lamb- ewe bonds and greater responses to stressors than male lambs51,52,53. In domestic sheep without limitations in the availability of food, abrupt weaning affected more the susceptibility to parasites and the growth rate of females than males5,9. On the other hand, mountain sheep lambs (Bighorn) males weaned 2 to 4 wk before the estimated time of the natural weaning, showed slower growth until puberty than those that remained with their mothers, but females were not affected54. This study was performed in natural conditions, where changes in the quality and quantity of available nutrients change throughout the year, having periods with strong feed limitations. This, together with the greater growth rate and energy demand of males, could explain the difference between male and female lambs. In general, although it has been reported that there are differences in susceptibility to parasites and the response of the immune system according to the gender of the offspring55,56,57 , information about the factors that differentially affect males and females in response to artificial weaning is still insufficient. Lambs of different breeds have different growth rates, implying different degrees of advance in their natural weaning, and therefore the response to artificial weaning. Rhoenschaf lambs vocalized more at weaning than Merino lambs58, which can be explained by the greater body development of this last58. Similarly, F1 Texel by Corriedale lambs showed greater body weight and more rumination after weaning than pure Corriedale lambs, despite being both reared by Corriedale mothers59,60.

The feeding level of the mother during pregnancy or after parturition can also affect the response of the lambs at weaning. Important feed restriction during pregnancy adversely affects the mother-lamb bond at lambing61 delays mother-lamb recognition62, and may alter the natural weaning process. Recently, it was observed that ewes maintained with food restriction before conception until the last third of gestation had lower body weight during pregnancy and produced less milk in the postpartum7(Freitas-de-Melo A, Ungerfeld R and Pérez-Clariget R, unpublished data). Lambs born from feed- restricted ewes grazed more before weaning, vocalized less and presented minor changes in the concentrations of albumin after weaning63 (Freitas-de-Melo A, Ungerfeld R and Pérez-Clariget R, unpublished data). Probably the lambs of ewes that had better nutrition during pregnancy were more stressed because they had more losses at weaning, since in addition to the mother, they lost a greater quantity of milk in an age in which consumption is still important. Another no opposed explanation is that lambs born from undernourished ewes had advanced their natural weaning process, since they presented a greater frequency of grazing before weaning probably to compensate the access to less milk amounts.

Types of artificial weaning

In sheep the available published scientific information relating ewe -lamb bond before weaning and the stress response is scarce. There are commonly four types of artificial weaning: abrupt, progressive, in steps with restriction of the time accessing the mother, and in steps through a fenceline. The most commonly applied type is abrupt weaning, with a complete separation of the ewe and her lamb so there is no visual, auditory or olfactory contact after weaning10.

Progressive weaning is the gradual separation of the ewe and her lamb to increase the time of separation until the complete separation. In this type of weaning, vocalizations increase in the first periods of temporary separation, but animals habituate to the separations, and therefore changes are not so intensive after definitive separation8. However, progressive weaning has caused a greater sensitivity to the infestation of parasites before and after definitive weaning8. According to these authors, the lambs had greater sensitivity to parasite infestation (weaning was done at 3 mo), so according to them, at this age is preferable to abrupt weaning so the increase in the infestation of parasites is not so great8.

In weaning through fences animals can communicate, and thus visual, auditory and olfactory contact is maintained before the final separation64. However, in this method lambs vocalized more the day of weaning, indicating greater stress than after abrupt weaning. Although females weaned from this method weighed more after weaning, they presented a smaller increase of the amount of coccidia that those weaned abruptly9, indicating that the immune response was adversely affected after the abrupt weaning.

There are some studies in two-steps weaning, in which during the first period the lambs are barred from suckling of the lamb covering the udder of the ewe, and in a second stage is the definitive separation. The lambs thus weaned responded with less agitation and vocalized less than abruptly weaned lambs6.

Management to reduce the stress response to weaning

In addition to different types of weaning, there are some practices that can be applied before or after weaning to reduce the response of ewes and lambs. Intravaginal devices used to synchronize estrus that release progesterone reduce the ewe response to weaning10. With these treatments ewes vocalize and pace less frequently. In addition, the treatment moderated the decrease of total proteins concentration, due to a minor reduction of the globulin concentration. The values of serum globulins after weaning in the untreated ewes decreased more than in ewes treated, reaching levels of hipoglobulinemia, which could indicate a state of immuno-deficiency. Therefore, this treatment can reduce susceptibility to diseases of ewes after weaning.

Although this treatment reduced the stress response to weaning, its application is not practical, as the treatment is prolonged and expensive. For this reason, it was recently investigated whether treatment with injectable progesterone administered only the day of weaning reduces the response of stress in sheep, which would generate practical alternatives. This treatment reduced markedly the frequency of pacing and walking the day of weaning, and a tendency to reduce the frequency of vocalizations compared with the control group65.

Other management that reduce the stress response is to induce estrus in the ewes by hormonal treatments the day of weaning, at the same time that rams are introduced35. This management reduced the increase of vocalization frequency and the cortisol concentration at weaning, and may be easily included in accelerated lambing systems aimed to obtain pregnant ewes during the early postpartum period.

It is also important to consider the management of animals after weaning. The post-weaning social enrichment improves the welfare of lambs66. The stress response of the lambs diminished when lambs remained for 1 h per day in close contact with a human who handled them gently (caressed them and spoke to them) after weaning, or if stayed in contact with two adult ewes. In addition, the animals who received these treatments of social enrichment grew more during the fattening period. At the end of the fattening period, the lambs that were in contact with the human immediately after weaned were less reactive to human manipulation.

Similarly, weaned lambs that grazed together with adult ewes presented a higher bite rate, and ruminated and grazed more than single weaned lambs67. These results indicate that the presence of adult animals at weaning mitigates the negative effects of separation from the mother, improving the efficiency of grazing. However, this, rather than as part of social enrichment, can be part of a strategy of social facilitation accelerating feeding learning by the lambs. It was also noted that the provision of a protein supplementation after weaning reduced parasite infestation in ewes5, improving the animals’ welfare.

Synthesis

In summary, artificial weaning is a stressful event for both the ewe and lamb, affecting their health the welfare, and the productive results. While this handling is necessary to optimize the productive results, the development and implementation of management systems that reduce stress, in addition to promoting animal welfare, could have an even more positive impact on health and productive aspects. However, the available knowledge on how to reduce the negative effects of weaning is still scarce, especially considering that many of them are applicable only in specific production systems. The great variability of breeds existing in sheep productive systems makes it necessary to develop a range of tools that can impact according to the different conditions, but allowing in synthesis, to respond to the current demands of society and increase the efficiency of the production systems.

Literatura citada

1. Poindron P, Levy F, Keller M. Maternal responsiveness and maternal selectivity in domestic sheep and goats: the two facets of maternal attachment. Dev Psychobiol 2006;(49):54-70. [ Links ]

2. Weary DM, Jasper J, Hötzel MJ. Understanding weaning distress. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2008;(110):24-41. [ Links ]

3. Brown TH. Early weaning of lambs. J Agric Sci 1964;(63):191-204. [ Links ]

4. Napolitano F, Rosa D, Sevi A. Welfare implications of artificial rearing and early weaning in sheep. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2008;(110):58-72. [ Links ]

5. Shaw KL, Nolan JV, Lynch JJ, Coverdale OR, Gill HS. Effects of weaning, supplementation and gender on acquired immunity to Haemonchus contortus in lambs. Int J Parasitol 1995;(25):381-387. [ Links ]

6. Schichowski C, Moors E, Gauly M. Effects of weaning lambs in two stages or by abrupt separation on their behavior and growth rate. J Anim Sci 2008;(86):220- 225. [ Links ]

7. Freitas-de-Melo A, Ungerfeld R, Hötzel MJ, Abud MJ, Alvarez-Oxiley A, Orihuela A, et al. Mother-young behaviours at lambing in grazing ewes: Effects of lamb sex and food restriction in pregnancy. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2015;(168):31-36. [ Links ]

8. Orgeur P, Mavric N, Yvore P, Bernard S, Nowak R, Schaal B, Levy F. Artificial weaning in sheep: consequences on behavioural, hormonal and immuno-pathological indicators of welfare. Appl Anim Behav Sci 1998;(58):87-103. [ Links ]

9. Orgeur P, Bernard S, Naciri M, Nowak R, Schaal B, Levy F. Psycological consequences of two different weaning methods in sheep. Reprod Nutr Dev 1999;(39):231-244. [ Links ]

10. Freitas-de-Melo A, Banchero G, Hötzel MJ, Damián JP, Ungerfeld R. Progesterone administration reduces the behavioural and physiological responses of ewes to abrupt weaning of lambs. Animal 2013;(8):1367-1373. [ Links ]

11. Nowak R, Porter RH, Blache D, Dwyer CM. Behaviour and the welfare of the sheep. In: Dwyer C editor. The welfare of sheep. 1rst ed. Edinburgh, United Kingdom: Springer; 2008:81-134. [ Links ]

12. Lynch JJ, Hinch GN, Adams DB. The behaviour of sheep: Biological principles and implications for production. Melbourne, CSIRO, (1992):126-152. [ Links ]

13. Poindron P, Le Neindre P. Endocrine and sensory regulation of the maternal behavior in the ewe. Adv Study Behav 1980;(11):75-119. [ Links ]

14. Smith FV, Van-toller C, Boyes T. The ‘critical period’ in the attachment of lambs and ewes. Anim Behav 1966;(14):120-125. [ Links ]

15. Clutton-Brock TH. The evolution of parental care. 1rst ed. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1991. [ Links ]

16. Lévy F, Keller M, Poindron P. Olfactory regulation of maternal behavior in mammals. Horm Behav 2004;(46):284-302. [ Links ]

17. Nowak R, Keller M, Val-Laillet D, Lévy F. Perinatal visceral events and brain mechanisms involved in the development of mother-young bonding in sheep. Horm Behav 2007;(52):92-98. [ Links ]

18. Nowak R. Senses involved in discrimination of merino ewes at close contact and from a distance by their newborn lambs. Anim Behav 1991;(42):357-366. [ Links ]

19. Nowak R, Lindsay DR. Discrimination of Merino ewes by their newborn lambs: important for survival? Appl Anim Behav Sci 1992;(34):61-74. [ Links ]

20. Hinch GN, Lecrivain E, Lynch JJ, Elwin RL. Changes in maternal-young associations with increasing age of lambs. Appl Anim Behav Sci 1987;(17):305-318. [ Links ]

21. Hinch GN. The suckling behaviour of triple, twin and single lambs at pasture. Appl Anim Behav Sci 1989;(22):39-48. [ Links ]

22. O’Connor CE, Jay NP, Nicol AM, Beatson PR. Ewe maternal behaviour score and lamb survival. Proc N Z Soc Anim Prod 1985;(45):159-162. [ Links ]

23. Ewbank E. Nursing and suckling behaviour amongst Clun Forest ewes and lambs. Anim Behav 1967;(15):251- 258. [ Links ]

24. Lyford SJ. Growth and development of the ruminant digestive system. In: Curch DC editor. The Ruminant Animal. New Jersey, USA: Prentice-Hall, 1988:44-63. [ Links ]

25. Geraseev LC, Perez JRO, Pedreira BC, Quintão FA, Oliveira RP. Effects of pre and postnatal nutritional restriction on visceral mass growth of Santa Ines lambs. Arq Bras Med Vet Zoo 2008;(60):960-969. [ Links ]

26. Arnold GW, Wallace SR, Maller RA. Some factors involved in natural weaning processes in sheep. Appl Anim Ethol 1979;(5):43-50. [ Links ]

27. Berger J. Weaning conflict in desert and mountain bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis): an ecological interpretation. Z Tierpsychol 1979;(50):188-200. [ Links ]

28. Vatankhaha M, Salehi SA. Genetic and non-genetic factors affecting Lori-Bakhtiari ewe body weight and its relationship with productivity. Small Ruminant Res 2010;(94):98-102. [ Links ]

29. Vatankhah M, Talebi MA, Zamani F. Relationship between ewe body condition score (BCS) at mating and reproductive and productive traits in Lori-Bakhtiari sheep. Small Ruminant Res 2012;(106):105-109. [ Links ]

30. Damián JP, Hötzel MJ, Banchero G, Ungerfeld R. Behavioural response of grazing lambs to changes associated with feeding and separation from their mothers at weaning. Res Vet Sci 2013;(95):913- 918. [ Links ]

31. Weary DM, Fraser D. Signalling need: costly signals and animal welfare assessment. Appl Anim Behav Sci 1995;(44):159-169. [ Links ]

32. Cockram MS, Imlah P, Goddard PJ, Harkiss GD, Waran NK. The behavioural, endocrine and leucocyte response of ewes to repeated removal of lambs before the age of natural weaning. Appl Anim Behav Sci 1993;(38):127-142. [ Links ]

33. Stephens DB, Baldwin BA. Observations on the behaviour of groups of artificially reared lambs. Res Vet Sci 1971;(12):219- 224. [ Links ]

34. Rhind SM, Reid HW, McMillen SR, Palmarini G. The role of cortisol and b-endorphin in the response of the immune system to weaning in lambs. Anim Sci 1998;(66):397-402. [ Links ]

35. Pérez-León I, Orihuela A, Lidfors L, Aguirre V. Reducing mother young separation distress by inducing ewes into oestrous into day of weaning. Anim Welf 2006;(15):383-389. [ Links ]

36. Bush IE, Ferguson KA. The secretion of the adrenal cortex in sheep. J Endocr 1953;(10):1-8. [ Links ]

37. Möstl E, Palme R. Hormones as indicators of stress. Domest Anim Endocrinol 2002;(23):67- 74. [ Links ]

38. Griffin JFT. Stress and immunity: A unifying concept. Vet Immunol Immun 1989;(20):263-312. [ Links ]

39. Blecha F, Pollman DS, Nichols DA. Weaning pigs at an early age decreases cellular immunity. Can J Vet Res 1986;(4):522-525. [ Links ]

40. Lynch EM, Earley B, McGee M and Doyle S. Characterisation of physiological and immunological responses in beef cows to abrupt weaning and subsequent housing. BMC Vet Res 2010;(6):37. [ Links ]

41. Ungerfeld R, Hotzel MJ, Scarsi A, Quintans G. Behavioral and physiological changes in early-weaned multiparous and primiparous beef cows. Animal 2011;(8):1270-1275. [ Links ]

42. Napolitano F, Marino V, De Rosa G, Capparelli R, Bordi A. Influence of artificial rearing on behavioral and immune response of lambs. Appl Anim Behav Sci 1995;(45):245-253. [ Links ]

43. Watson DL, Gill HS. The effect of weaning on antibody responses and nematode parasitism in Merino lambs. Res Vet Sci 1991;(51):128-132. [ Links ]

44. Lee GJ, Harris D, Ferguson BD, Jelbart RA. Growth and carcass fatness of ewe, wether, ram and cyptorchid crossbred lambs reared at pasture: effects of weaning age. Aust J Exp Agr 1990;(30):743-747. [ Links ]

45. Caneque V, Velasco S, Diaz M, Perez C, Huidobro F, Lauzurica S, et al. Effects of weaning age and slaughter weight on carcass and meat quality of Talaverana breed lambs raised at pasture. Anim Sci 2001;(73):85-95. [ Links ]

46. Schichowski C, Moors E, Gauly M. Influence of weaning age and an experimental Haemonchus contortus infection on behaviour and growth rates of lambs. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2010;(125):103-108. [ Links ]

47. Geenty KG. Influence of weaning age, management, and slaughter age on export lamb carcass production and slipe wool weights. N Z J Agric Res 1980;(23):433-440. [ Links ]

48. Gaili E. Effect of weaning age on postweaning feedlot performance and carcass characteristics of Najdi lambs. World Rev Anim Prod 1992;(27):61. [ Links ]

49. Langland JP, Donald GE. The intakes and growth rate of grazing Border Leicester X Merino lambs weaned at 21, 49, and 77 days. Anim Prod 1975;(21):175-181. [ Links ]

50. Aksakal V, Ebru E, Memis O, Muhlis M. Effects of various ages of weaning on growth performance of Morkaraman lambs. J Anim Vet Adv 2009;(8):1551-1554. [ Links ]

51. Gaudin S, Chaillou E, Cornilleau F, Moussu C, Boivin X, Nowak R. Daughters are more strongly attached to their mother than sons: a possible mechanism for early social segregation. Anim Behav 2015;(102):33-43. [ Links ]

52. Hernandez CE, Matthwes LR, Oliver MH, Bloomfield FH, Harding JE. Effects of sex, litter size and periconceptional ewe nutrition on the ewe-lamb bond. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2009;(120):76-83. [ Links ]

53. Hernandez CE, Matthews LR, Oliver MH, Bloomfield FH, Harding JE. Effects of sex, litter size and periconceptional ewe nutrition on offspring behavioural and physiological response to isolation. Physiol Behav 2010;(101):588-594. [ Links ]

54. Festa-Bianchet M, Jorgenson JT, Wishart WD. Early weaning in bighorn sheep, Ovis canadensis affects growth of males but not of females. Behav Ecol 1994;(5):21-27. [ Links ]

55. Folstad I, Karter AJ. Parasites, bright males and the immunocompetence handicap. American Naturalist 1992;(139):603-622. [ Links ]

56. Barger IA. Influence of sex and reproduction status on susceptibility of ruminants to nematode parasitism. Int J Parasitol 1993;(23):463-469. [ Links ]

57. Sarasa M, Rambozzi L, Rossi L, Meneguz PG, Serrano E, Granados JE, et al. Sarcoptes scabiei: Specific immune response to sarcoptic mange in the Iberian ibex Capra pyrenaica depends on previous exposure and sex. Exp Parasitol 2010;(124):265-271. [ Links ]

58. Seibert B, Gauly M, Erhardt G. Productivity of different sheep breeds in extensive pasture management. Arch Tierz 2004;(47):147-152. [ Links ]

59. Freitas-de-Melo A, Ungerfeld R, Pérez-Clariget R. Cruzamientos ovinos Texel por Corriedale: I. Comportamiento alimenticio y crecimiento corporal de los corderos. Aceptado para su presentación en XXIV Congreso de la Asociación Latinoamericana de Producción Animal (ALPA). Puerto Varas. Chile. 2015. [ Links ]

60. Freitas-de-Melo A, Ungerfeld R, Pérez-Clariget R. Cruzamientos ovinos Texel por Corriedale: II. Respuesta comportamental de los corderos al destete. Aceptado para su presentación en XXIV Congreso de la Asociación Latinoamericana de Producción Animal (ALPA). Puerto Varas. Chile. 2015. [ Links ]

61. Dwyer CM, Lawrence AB, Bishop SC, Lewis M. Ewe-Lamb bonding behaviours at birth are affected by maternal undernutrition in pregnancy. Brit J Nut 2003;(89):123-136. [ Links ]

62. Olazabal-Fenochio A, Vera -Ávila HR, Serafín-López N, Medrano-Hernández JA, Sánchez-Saucedo H, Terrazas-García AM. Reconocimiento mutuo madre-cría en ovinos Columbia con restricción nutricional durante la gestación. Rev Mex Cienc Pecu 2013;4(2):127-147. [ Links ]

63. Freitas-de-Melo A, Ungerfeld R, Abud MJ, Pérez-Clariget R. Behavioural response of lambs weaned from ewes that grazed in two pasture allowances in pregnancy. Ann Meet European Fed Anim Sci (EAAP). Varsovia; Polonia. 2015:367. [ Links ]

64. Orihuela A, Suárez E, Vázquez R. Effect of restricting suckling on the social bond between ewes and their 10-week-old lambs. Livest Prod Sci 2004;(87):259-264. [ Links ]

65. Freitas-de-Melo A, Ungerfeld R, Pérez-Clariget R. Progesterone administration reduces the behavioural response of ewes at weaning. Ann Meet European Fed Anim Sci (EAAP). Varsovia; Polonia. 2015:369. [ Links ]

66. Pascual-Alonso M, Miranda-de la Lama GC, Aguayo-Ulloa L, Ezquerro L, Villarroel M, Marín RH, Maria GA. Effect of postweaning handling strategies on welfare and productive traits in lambs. J Appl Anim Welf Sci2015;18(1):42-56. [ Links ]

67. Youssef MYI, Philips CJC, Metwally M. The effect of pre-weaning grazing experience and presence of adult ewes on grazing behaviour of weaned lambs. Appl Anim Behav Sci 1995;(44):257-281. [ Links ]

Received: March 13, 2015; Accepted: September 13, 2015

Creative Commons License Este es un artículo publicado en acceso abierto bajo una licencia Creative Commons