Servicios Personalizados
Revista
Articulo
Indicadores
- Citado por SciELO
- Accesos
Links relacionados
- Similares en SciELO
Compartir
Revista mexicana de ciencias agrícolas
versión impresa ISSN 2007-0934
Rev. Mex. Cienc. Agríc vol.13 no.1 Texcoco ene./feb. 2022 Epub 02-Mayo-2022
https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v13i1.3096
Articles
Reduction of hydrogen sulfide by recirculation of effluents in stabilization ponds with the presence of microalgae
1Laguna Region Unit-Antonio Narro Autonomous Agrarian University. Peripheral Raúl López Sánchez s/n, Colonia Valle Verde, Torreon, Coahuila, Mexico. CP. 34056. (isaius@hotmail.com; nabel-87@hotmail.com).
2Technological Institute of Torreón-Doctorate in Water and Soil. Torreón-San Pedro Highway km 7.5, Ejido Ana, Torreón, Coahuila, Mexico. CP. 27170. (andy.grape.47@gmail.com; sergio.ortdiaz@gmail.com).
Stabilization ponds (SPs) are used as an alternative for wastewater treatment; however, one of their disadvantages is the emission of bad odors caused by hydrogen sulfide (H2S), which is highly toxic and corrosive, in addition to causing damage to the health of the surrounding population and negatively affecting the metallic structures and electrical equipment exposed. This problem is a priority to be solved in order to continue with the operation of wastewater treatment plants. In this study, a procedure based on the recirculation of 20% of the effluent, which contains native microalgae, is presented as a solution alternative. To determine the optimal percentage of effluent recirculation, a series of recirculation tests were implemented through the jar method and subsequently it was taken to a macro scale, evaluating the performance of the effluent recirculation, comparing the monthly averages of 2019 before the implementation of the project with 2020 already operating. The results showed significant changes in the percentages of pollutant removal, in the biochemical oxygen demand, of 20.8%, total suspended solids, 22.17%, fats and oils, 29.5% and a reduction in fecal coliforms, 91.4%, in addition to reducing H2S with 48.9%, which reduces unpleasant odors and the potential toxic effect on health. We can conclude that the methodology is efficient in improving the parameters, thus complying with the standards of the applicable regulations.
Keywords effluent recirculation; wastewater treatment.
Las lagunas de estabilización (LE) se utilizan como una alternativa para el tratamiento de aguas residuales; sin embargo, una de sus desventajas es la emisión de malos olores ocasionados por el ácido sulfhídrico (H2S), el cual es altamente tóxico y corrosivo, además de que provoca daños a la salud de la población aledaña y afecta negativamente a las estructuras metálicas y equipos eléctricos expuestos. Esta problemática es una prioridad para resolver y continuar con la operación de las plantas de tratamiento de agua residual. En este estudio se presenta como alternativa de solución un procedimiento basado en la recirculación del efluente de 20%, el cual contiene microalgas nativas. Para determinar el porcentaje óptimo de recirculación del efluente, se implementó una serie de pruebas de recirculación a través del método de jarras y posteriormente fue llevado a escala macro, evaluando el desempeño de la recirculación del efluente comparando los promedios mensuales del año 2019 antes de la implementación del proyecto con 2020 ya operando. Los resultados mostraron cambios significativos en los porcentajes de remoción de contaminantes, en la demanda bioquímica de oxígeno, de 20.8%, solidos suspendidos totales, 22.17%, grasas y aceites, 29.5% y una reducción en los coliformes fecales, 91.4%, además de reducción del H2S con un 48.9%, lo que disminuye los olores desagradables y potencial efecto toxico a la salud. Podemos concluir que la metodología es eficiente en la mejora de los parámetros antes mencionados, cumpliendo así los estándares de las normativas aplicables.
Palabras claves recirculación del efluente; tratamiento de aguas residuales
Introduction
SPs are a type of wastewater treatment (WWT) system consisting of artificial ponds that require long hydraulic retention times that improve water quality, this type of treatment is recommended in countries with tropical climates, since environmental conditions increase the efficiency in the removal of pollutant (Coggins et al., 2019). SPs can be classified in relation to the presence of oxygen into three types: anaerobic, facultative and maturation (Edokpayi et al., 2021). In the anaerobic ones, the bacteria present do not require dissolved oxygen for the decomposition of organic matter, since this is degraded by methanogenic processes, facultative ponds are characterized by the presence and absence of dissolved oxygen, having an aerobic process in the upper layer and anaerobic conditions in the lower layer (Joshi et al., 2020).
While maturation ponds have little depth, thus being a totally aerobic process. Their design has three main objectives. The elimination of fecal coliforms and pathogenic microorganisms, which represent a serious health hazard, causing diseases such as: hepatitis, cholera and typhoid, among other important ones (Achag et al., 2021), removal of nutrients: nitrogen and phosphorus, in order to avoid eutrophication in the receiving bodies (Laaksonen et al., 2017) and finally the removal of organic matter also called biochemical oxygen demand (BOD5), responsible for the depletion of dissolved oxygen necessary for the maintenance of aquatic ecosystems (Minakshi et al., 2018). The result of the final effluent of the WWT must comply with the water quality referred to in NOM-001-SEMARNAT-1996, which indicates the maximum permissible limits (DOF, 1996).
The main advantages of SPs are their low construction, operation and maintenance costs compared to other WWT systems, which is why it is the most frequently used system in small municipalities and regions with large areas available (Al-Zreiqat et al., 2018). SPs are well accepted in developing countries because they are economically viable (López et al., 2018). However, a disadvantage of SP systems is that they generate a socioenvironmental problem; due to the bad smell caused by the decomposition of organic matter in anaerobic ponds (Ho et al., 2018).
The bad smell generated in SPs is caused by the generation of H2S, derived from the presence of sulfates in the wastewater, where the sulfate-reducing anaerobic bacteria use the oxygen of the sulfates, generating this acid, which produces the smell of rotten egg and mercaptans (Ramazan, 2021), which can be a real nuisance for communities and residents, who coincide in the reception of winds from treatment plants. It is important to mention that H2S, beyond the odor, is a highly corrosive agent and causes damage to the structural integrity of WWT facilities and it is known that this compound in contact with living beings is highly harmful because it has been reported that it can cause from headaches to death (Sun et al., 2019; Salehi and Chaiprapat, 2019).
For this reason, there is a need to make a modification in the design of SPs in which it is proposed to apply a reengineering to the WWT by implementing a recirculation of the effluent at the beginning of the process, achieving the following advantages: avoid the generation of odors by reducing the concentration of H2S, control the seasonal variations of the main parameters, maintain aerobic conditions at the entrance of the first pond (Liu, 2018). Based on the above, the objective of this study was to improve the current system of stabilization ponds in the municipality of Torreón, Coahuila, through the execution of a process of recirculation of 20% of the effluent to the primary ponds, determining parameters of water quality (pH, electrical conductivity, BOD5, total suspended solids, dissolved oxygen, fats and oils, fecal coliforms, helminth eggs and generation of H2S.
Materials and methods
Study area
The SPs of this study are in the municipal wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) of Torreón Coahuila, Mexico, at 25° 30’ 50.3” north latitude; 103° 19’ 16.8” west longitude and 1 125 masl. The study was conducted during the period from January to December 2019 and 2020 (Figure 1).
Determination of the percentage of return
To determine the percentage of the effluent, a preliminary experiment was carried out by means of tests by the jar method (Leones et al., 2018), in 1 L beakers (Figure 1) jar equipment, model TS1198X85, Thomas Scientific brand, which consisted of making mixtures of the influent and effluent with different percentages of recirculation 10, 20 and 30% respectively, to know the optimal percentage of water quality without impacting operating costs.
Stages of the study
In the present study, two stages were carried out; stage 1, 20 monitoring points were determined at intervals of 100 m in the periphery of the WWTP, in which measurements of H2S levels were carried out (Figure 2).
Stage 2, water samples were taken according to NOM-001-SEMARNAT-1996, every 15 days for 24 months, from the influent and effluent, in which the parameters of pH, electrical conductivity (E.C.), biochemical oxygen demand (BOD5), total suspended solids (TSS), dissolved oxygen (DO) and fats and oils, fecal coliforms, helminth eggs and generation H2S were determined.
Analytical methods
The above parameters were determined using the methodologies proposed by the standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater (Rice et al., 2012). The pH values were obtained by a potentiometer (ultra BASIC series meter; Denver, Colorado. USA), electrical conductivity (E.C.) using a conductivity meter (Hanna HI 993310 Ann Arbor, Michigan. USA). The biochemical oxygen demand (BOD5) was determined according to NMX-AA-030/1-SCFI-2012 with a dissolved oxygen probe (Orion, thermo scientific), the total suspended solids (TSS) were determined by porcelain evaporation capsules, using a Gooch crucible filtration device according to the (Secretaría de Economía, 2015), for dissolved oxygen (DO), it was determined according to the (Secretaría de Economía, 2001), using the same probe as in the determination of BOD5, for the determination of fats and oils, an extraction equipment (Soxleth Fermatte) was used according to the standard of the Secretaría de Economía, 2013, for fecal coliforms, they were determined by the most probable number (MPN) technique, according to the standard of the Secretaría de Economía (1987), for the determination of helminth eggs, the screening technique was used according to the standard of the Secretaría de Economía, 2012.
And for the determination of the H2S concentration, a GasAlertMax XT II gas detector (Honeywell, United States of America) with 0-200 ppm measurement ranges and 1 ppm resolution was used. The calibration of the equipment was according to the manufacturer’s specifications.
Data analysis
The results obtained were analyzed using a statistical analysis of means, standard deviation and a Student’s t test (α= 0.05) (Walpone et al., 2012). These results were the product of a monthly sampling at each point, these samples were carried out for two years for comparative effects, before recirculation (2019) and after recirculation (2020).
Results and discussion
Twenty percent of the total effluent of the WWTP was considered as the optimal percentage for the recirculation, this was determined by a preliminary test by the jar test (Table 1). For the analysis of the results, the values prior to the recirculation of the influent and effluent (2019) were contrasted with respect to the values after it (2020).
Parameters | Influent | 10% test | 20% test | 30% test | 40% test | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean | Stdev | Mean | Stdev | Mean | Stdev | Mean | Stdev | Mean | Stdev | |||||
Fats and oils (mg L-1) | 82.25 | ±7.4 | 71 | ±9.5 | 55.8 | ±3.4 | 51 | ±4.1 | 46.8 | ±4.4 | ||||
BOD5 (mg L-1) | 300 | ±16.9 | 274.6 | ±0 | 230.9 | ±0 | 215.3 | ±0 | 188.8 | ±0 | ||||
TSS (mg L-1) | 281.9 | ±15.3 | 266.4 | ±0 | 228.3 | ±0 | 193.2 | ±0 | 178.5 | ±0 | ||||
DO (mg L-1) | 0 | ±0 | 0.35 | ±0.15 | 1.45 | ±0.45 | 1.65 | ±0.45 | 1.9 | ±0.4 | ||||
H2S (mg m-3) | 22.5 | ±4.9 | 12 | ±2 | 7.5 | ±1.5 | 5.5 | ±1.5 | 4 | ±1 | ||||
pH | 6.9 | ±0 | 7.3 | ±0.1 | 7.65 | ±0.25 | 8.05 | ±0.15 | 8.3 | ±0.2 | ||||
Conductivity (mS cm-1) | 101.7 | ±11.9 | 95.4 | ±7.3 | 97.4 | ±10.7 | 92.75 | ±8.45 | 90.9 | ±8.5 |
pH variation
Before recirculation, the average pH value in the influent was 7.5 ±0.2, while in the effluent, in the same period, it had an annual average of 8.3 ±0.2. After the recirculation of 20%, the results obtained were annual averages of 7.2 ±0.2 for the influent and 8.2 ±0.3 for the effluent (Figure 3).
No significant differences between the results before and after recirculation were found. It is considered that this was mainly due to the natural variations of the wastewater generated in the municipality, this is very relevant because the variation of the pH considerably affects the structure of the microbial communities and therefore causes a fluctuation in the production of H2S. However, these pH ranges continue to be ideal for other wastewater treatment processes (Leite et al., 2020) and it is important to mention that these values are also optimal for a future nitrogen and phosphorus recovery process (Kuzumita et al., 2020).
Variation of EC
The value of the annual average for the EC of 2019 in the effluent, before recirculation, was 100.8 ±8.6 mS cm-1, while in 2020, after recirculation, an average of 103.7 ±9 mS cm-1 was obtained. No significant differences before and after recirculation were found, nor effect on the process of generation of H2S.
Biochemical oxygen demand
The value of the annual average for the BOD5 of 2019, before recirculation, was 231.7 mg L-1, while in 2020, after recirculation, an average of 83.1 mg L-1 was obtained. The removal percentages for BOD5 ranged from 56.5 to 64.7% and after recirculation (Table 1), the averages ranged from 34.2 to 60.5. For 2020, the averages ranged from 50.1 to 93.1, with an average of (78 ±15.2%) in June. At the international level, values ranging between 20.2 and 85.1 have been reported (Verbyla, 2016), which indicates that the recirculation in the present work improved the removal of BOD5 (Figure 4), more markedly for 2020, except for January, the values were higher in the other months prior to recirculation in 2019 (Ávila et al., 2017).
They obtained higher values but this was due to the quality of the water they used, in addition to using a percentage of recirculation much higher than ours (50%), on the other hand, their study also proves that the efficiency of the technique can decrease between 10 and 15%, depending on the season of the year, obtaining better in summer compared to winter (Minakshi et al., 2017), it uses recirculation ranges between 25 and 75%, seeing that, with this last percentage, the removal of BOD was much better, but significant changes in the decrease in contaminants begin to be noticed with only 25% recirculation.
Total suspended solids
The value of the annual average for the TSS of 2019, before recirculation, was 114.3 mg L-1, while after recirculation in 2020, it was 89 mg L-1 (Table 1). The removal percentages obtained for TSS for 2019 ranged from 35.1-80.5% before recirculation and 27.1-60.9% after recirculation. Although the improvement was not so evident in 2019, by mid-2020, the situation was improved with removal values of 66.8-91% (Table 2). Published studies have determined that the percentages fluctuate with values from 25.7-86% (Verbyla, 2016).
2019 | 2020 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean | Stdev | Mean | Stdev | ||
Fats and oils (mg L-1) | Influent | 56.32 | ±14.37 | 68.93 | ±15.59 |
Effluent | 19.67 | ±3.96 | 13.86 | ±2.56 | |
Total suspended solids (mg L-1) | Influent | 256.53 | ±14.69 | 229.29 | ±35.81 |
Effluent | 114.34 | ±21.2 | 88.98 | ±26.26 | |
BOD5 (mg L-1) | Influent | 231.68 | ±49.66 | 236.33 | ±49.66 |
Effluent | 105.04 | ±24.5 | 83.11 | ±24.5 | |
Fecal coliforms | Influent (E06) | 7.14 | ±0.68 | 8.98 | ±0.68 |
Effluent (E04) | 54.3 | ±0.8 | 4.4 | ±0.8 | |
Potential of hydrogen | Influent | 7.45 | ±0.24 | 7.22 | ±0.24 |
Effluent | 8.28 | ±0.29 | 8.17 | ±0.29 | |
Dissolved oxygen (mg L-1) | Influent | 0.06 | ±0.09 | 0.3 | ±0.09 |
Effluent | 7.18 | ±1.45 | 7.86 | ±1.45 | |
Helminth eggs (MPN) | Influent | 7.83 | ±2.11 | 8.42 | ±2.11 |
Effluent | 3.75 | ±1.19 | 1.83 | ±1.19 | |
Electrical conductivity (mS cm-1) | Influent | 111.54 | ±8.58 | 109.16 | ±8.58 |
Influent | 100.8 | ±9.91 | 103.71 | ±9.91 |
Dissolved oxygen
The value of the annual average for the DO of 2019, before recirculation, was 7.2 mg L-1, while in 2020, post-recirculation, it was 7.9 mg L-1. Unlike other measured parameters, the increase in the concentration of dissolved oxygen is a remarkable and positive result, since, in this way, the inhibition of the growth of anaerobic bacterial communities is achieved, which are responsible for the production of H2S; therefore, the harmful effects of this compound and therefore the bad odors decrease considerably (Aslam et al., 2019). The observed increase is due to the increase in the concentration of algae (Jørgensen, 2020).
Fats and oils
The value of the annual average for fats and oils of 2019 in the effluent, before recirculation, was 19.7 mg L-1, while in 2020, after recirculation, a decrease of 70.4% was obtained. According to the results found, the reduction values from influent to effluent during 2019 began with 43.5%, these values were increasing after the recirculation process to 83.5% in 2020.
This increase of about 40% is mainly due to two factors, the increase in dissolved oxygen favors the development of aerobic bacteria and increases their metabolic activity, which increases the rate of removal of contaminants (Holmes et al., 2019), on the other hand, recirculation increases the hydraulic retention period, which in turn increases the contact time of lipophilic bacteria with fats and oils, enhancing their degradation (Cisterna, 2015).
Fecal coliforms
The value of the annual average for FC of 2019 in the effluent, before recirculation, was 4.5 E04 MPN 100 ml-1, while in 2020 after recirculation, an average of 4.8 E04 MPN 100 ml-1 was obtained. This increase is due to the natural variations of the influent since, in 2019, there was an average value of 7.14 E06 with a removal of the order 99.369%, requiring a removal greater than 99.985% to comply with the provisions of NOM-SEMARNAT-1996 (this without recirculation).
In 2020 with the recirculation, the average value of the influent was 8.97 E06 with a removal of the order of 99.46%, which is almost a decimal unit, which in exponential removal of fecal coliforms is very significant. This effect is due to the same causes presented in the parameters of DO and fats and oils. These results are superior to those reported in studies of coliform reduction models in 186 maturation ponds worldwide (Rezvani et al., 2021). Several studies presented levels of reduction of this indicator in averages of 23-99% (Sheludchenko et al., 2016; Verbyla et al., 2016), where one of these studies presented lower values (23-43%) than those found in our study in 2020 (Reinoso et al., 2011). This indicates that the stabilization ponds meet the objective of pathogen reduction.
In the parameter of fecal coliforms, although it is still above the standard, the reduction presented in this study is considerable and in conjunction with other types of systems (chemical or homogenization curtains) (Cortés, 2013), the combination of both processes could achieve compliance with the applicable regulations without requiring heavy investments.
Helminth eggs
The helminth egg parameter also had a significant result, decreasing almost by half after recirculation. The value of the annual average for helminth eggs in 2019, before recirculation, was 3.75 E/L, while in 2020, after recirculation, it was 1.83 E/L. This reduction of almost 50% is remarkable, although it is true, prior to recirculation, this parameter was below the maximum permissible limit, which is 5 E/L, and given its behavior in a stratified water column, it is expected that the recirculation coupled with a process of physical homogenization, such as flow reduction curtains, will achieve their total elimination (Benito et al., 2020).
Generation of H2S
Emissions of gases such as H2S are responsible for bad odors and were significantly reduced during the samplings of 2020 (p= 0.01). The results were statistically different comparing the before and after recirculation, obtaining an average annual reduction of 48.9% of H2S (μg L-1) v/v. Achieving that the parameter is within the permissible limits indicated in the standard of the Secretaría del Trabajo y Previsión Social (1999). From the chemical point of view, the recirculation of the effluent inhibited the generation of H2S in the anaerobic ponds, since the added effluent contained a greater number of microalgae and calcium carbonates, which contributes to the elimination of the microbiota by alkalinization of the medium.
It is important to emphasize that the methanogenic microbiota is acidophilic and, therefore, competition with microalgae prevents its development and the generation of H2S responsible for bad odors, this phenomenon causes a sealing effect since, in the upper layers, an alkaline environment with more oxygen is generated and due to this stratified arrangement, the lower layers do not suffer alterations in their traditional functioning, since the anaerobiosis and the natural microbiota do not change and continue to work with the same efficiency of removal of other contaminants (Aslam et al., 2019; Sun et al., 2019; Salehi and Chaiprapat, 2019).
The recirculation allows the concentration of H2S to decrease considerably, although this compound is not a greenhouse gas, it is estimated that other gases also decrease their production with this reengineering, such as the greenhouse gases that are produced in the WWTP (methane, carbon dioxide), although it is not the objective of this study, it would be advisable to determine the decrease in the concentration of these gases, evaluating recirculation as an alternative for the mitigation of climate change due to the greenhouse effect in SPs (Figure 5).
Conclusions
The recirculation of 20% of the effluent significantly reduced (p= 0.05) the values of fats, oils, fecal coliforms, helminth eggs and generation of H2S. This allowed compliance with the parameters of fats and oils in Mexican regulations. It is also important to mention that the concentration of H2S decreased at the 20 sampling points; however, this pollutant is not regulated in Mexican environmental legislation even though its toxicity is reported in international literature.
On the other hand, although there was a considerable reduction in the concentration of coliforms, this parameter is still out of the standard, which is to be expected since its initial concentration was high and, given the nature of this type of treatment, it is difficult to achieve the concentration stipulated in the standard, it is important to note that even other types of treatments do not manage to lower the concentration of coliforms to comply with the standard, therefore, they must resort to chemical disinfection processes.
In view of the results obtained, recirculation represents a viable alternative from the economic and ecological point of view since it reduces operating costs, and in terms of environmental health reduces the risk of exposure to toxic gases in the surrounding population. It is advisable to continue the evaluation for a longer period, since only one year was evaluated, its continuation being interesting to continue analyzing the effects of recirculation in the face of natural and seasonal variations of the influent.
Literatura citada
Achag, B.; Mouhanni, H. and Bendou, H. 2021, Hydro-biological characterization and efficiency of natural waste stabilization ponds in a desert climate city of assa. Southern Morocco J. Water Supply Res. Technology-Aqua. 70(3):361-374. [ Links ]
Al-Zreiqat, I.; Abbassi, B.; Headley, T.; Nivala, J.; Van-Afferden, M and Müller, R. 2018. Influence of septic tank attached growth media on total nitrogen removal in a recirculating vertical flow constructed wetland for treatment of domestic wastewater. Ecol. Eng. 118(10):171-178. [ Links ]
Aslam, A.; Khan, S. J. and Shahzad, H. M. A. 2019. Impact of sludge recirculation ratios on the performance of anaerobic membrane bioreactor for wastewater treatment. Bio. Technol. 288 (121473) 9. [ Links ]
Benito, M.; Menacho, C.; Chueca, P.; Ormad, M. P. and Goni, P. 2020. Seeking the reuse of effluents and sludge from conventional wastewater treatment plants: Analysis of the presence of intestinal protozoa and nematode eggs. J. Environ. Manag. 261(110268):9. [ Links ]
Cisterna, P.; Gutiérrez, A. and Sastre, A. 2015. H. Impact of previous acclimatization of biomass and alternative substrates in sunflower oil biodegradation. Dyna. 82(193):56-61. [ Links ]
Coggins, L. X.; Crosbie, N. D. and Ghadouani, A. 2019. The small, the big, and the beautiful: emerging challenges and opportunities for waste stabilization ponds in Australia. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water. 6(6):1-18. [ Links ]
Edokpayi, J. N.; Odiyo, J. O.; Popoola, O. E. and Msagati, T. A. M. 2021. Evaluation of contaminants removal by waste stabilization ponds: a case study of siloam WSPs in vhembe district, South Africa. Heliyon. 7(2):1-12. [ Links ]
Ho, L.; Pham, D.; Van-Echelpoel, W.; Muchene, L.; Shkedy, Z.; Alvarado, A. and Goethals, P. 2018. A closer look on spatiotemporal variations of dissolved oxygen in waste stabilization ponds using mixed models. Water. 10(2):1-18. [ Links ]
Jørgensen, S. E. 2020. Waste: stabilization ponds. CRC Press. 2a (Ed.). 8 p. [ Links ]
Leones, M.; Riaños, K. y Mercado L. 2018. Evaluación del poder coagulante del sulfato de aluminioen el proceso de clarificación del agua de la Ciénega de Mlambo-Atlántico. Rev. UIS Ingenierias. 17(2):95-104. [ Links ]
Liu, L.; Hall, G. and Champagne, P. 2018. Disinfection processes and mechanisms in wastewater stabilization ponds: A Review. Environ. Rev. 26(4):1-13. [ Links ]
Minakshi, D.; Kumar, P.; Anju, S.; Piyush, R.; Malaviya, P. and Narveer, S. 2018. Treatment of dairy farm effluent using recirculating constructed wetland units. Adv. Health Environ. Saf. 57-66 pp. [ Links ]
Ramazan, V. 2021. Upgrading of waste stabilization ponds using a low-cost small-scale fine bubble diffused aeration system. Water Sci. Technol. 84(10-11):3104-3121. [ Links ]
Reinoso, R.; Blanco, S.; Torres-Villamizar, L. A. and Becares, E. 2011. Mechanisms for parasites removal in a waste stabilisation pond. Microb. Ecol. 61(3):684-692. [ Links ]
Rezvani-Ghalhari, M.; Schönberger, H. and Askari-Lasaki, B. 2021. Performance evaluation and siting index of the stabilization ponds based on environmental parameters: a case study in Iran. J. Environ. Health Sci. Eng. 19(2):1681-1700. [ Links ]
Rice, E. W.; Baird, R. B. and Eaton, A. D. 2012. Standar methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 22th. (Ed.). American public health association Washington DC. 54(22):674-689. [ Links ]
Salehi, R. and Chaiprapat, S. 2019. Single-/triple-stage biotrickling filter treating a H2S-rich biogas stream: statistical analysis of the effect of empty bed retention time and liquid recirculation velocity. J. Air & Waste Manag. Association. 69(12):1429-1437. [ Links ]
SE. 1987. Secretaría de Economía. Norma mexicana nmx-aa-42 calidad del agua-determinación del número más probable (NMP) de coliformes totales, coliformes fecales (termotolerantes) y escherichia coli presuntiva. Diario Oficial de la Federación. 10-17 pp. [ Links ]
SE. 2001. Secretaría de Economía. Norma mexicana, análisis de agua determinación de la demanda bioquímica de oxígeno en aguas naturales, residuales (DBO5) y residuales tratadas método de prueba. Diario Oficial de la Federación. 15-17 pp. [ Links ]
SE. 2013. Secretaría de Economía. Norma mexicana nmx-aa-005-scfi análisis de agua medición de grasas y aceites recuperables en aguas naturales, residuales y residuales tratadas. Método de prueba. Diario Oficial de la Federación. 5-11 pp. [ Links ]
SE. Secretaría de Economía. 2012. Norma mexicana nmx-aa-113-scfi análisis de agua medición del número de huevos de helminto en aguas residuales y residuales tratadas por observación microscópica - método de prueba. Diario Oficial de la Federación. 1-14 pp. [ Links ]
STPS. 1998. Secretaría del Trabajo y Previsión Social. NOM-010-STPS, condiciones de seguridad e higiene en los centros de trabajo donde se manejen, transporten, procesen o almacenen sustancias químicas capaces de generar contaminación en el medio ambiente laboral. Diario Oficial de la Federación. 13-14 pp. [ Links ]
Secretaría de Economía. 2001. Norma mexicana NMX-AA-012-SCFI análisis de agua determinación de oxígeno disuelto en aguas naturales, residuales y residuales tratadas método de prueba. Diario Oficial de la Federación. 11-13 pp. [ Links ]
Secretaría de Economía. 2015. Norma mexicana NMX-AA-034-SCF análisis de agua medición de sólidos y sales disueltas en aguas naturales, residuales y residuales tratadas método de prueba. Diario Oficial de la Federación . 4-13 pp. [ Links ]
SEMARNAT. 1996. Norma oficial mexicana NOM-001-Ecol, que establece los límites máximos permisibles de contaminantes en las descargas de aguas residuales en aguas y bienes nacionales. 10-14 pp. [ Links ]
Sheludchenko, M.; Padovan, A.; Katouli, M. and Stratton, H. 2016. Removal of fecal indicators, pathogenic bacteria, adenovirus, cryptosporidium and giardia (oo) cysts in waste stabilization ponds in northern and eastern australia. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 13(1):1-18. [ Links ]
Sun, S.; Jia, T. and Chen, K. 2019. Simultaneous removal of hydrogen sulfide and volatile organic sulfur compounds in off-gas mixture from a wastewater treatment plant using a two-stage bio-trickling filter system. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. 13(60):1-13. [ Links ]
Verbyla, M. E.; Iriarte, M. M.; Mercado-Guzmán, A.; Coronado, O.; Almanza, M. and Mihelcic, J. R. 2016. Pathogens and fecal indicators in waste stabilization pond systems with direct reuse for irrigation: Fate and transport in water, soil and crops. Sci. Total Environ. 551-552(10):429-437. [ Links ]
Walpone, R. E.; Myers, R. H.; Myers, S. L. y Ye, K. 2012. Probabilidad y estadística para ingeniería y ciencias, 9a (Ed.). Pearson educación México, México. 816 p. [ Links ]
Received: November 2021; Accepted: January 2022