SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.10 número3Rendimiento forrajero de maíces adaptados al trópico húmedo de MéxicoCompuestos orgánicos volátiles de plantas inducidos por insectos: situación actual en México índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Revista mexicana de ciencias agrícolas

versión impresa ISSN 2007-0934

Rev. Mex. Cienc. Agríc vol.10 no.3 Texcoco abr./may. 2019  Epub 30-Mar-2020

https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v10i3.1758 

Articles

Phenotypic variability in faba beans collections from the Valley Toluca-Atlacomulco, Mexico

María Elena Salazar Laureles1 

Delfina de Jesús Pérez López1  § 

Andrés González Huerta1 

Luis Miguel Vázquez García2 

1Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México-Facultad de Ciencias Agrícolas-Campus Universitario ‘El Cerrillo’. El Cerrillo Piedras Blancas, Toluca, México. CP. 50200. Tel. 01(722) 2965529.

2Centro Universitario Tenancingo-Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México. Carretera Tenancingo-Villa Guerrero km 1.5, Ex-hacienda Santana, Estado de México. CP. 52400. (agonzalezh@uaemex.mx; mesl2003@yahoo.com.mx; lmvazquezg@uaemex.mx.


Abstract

This study was conducted in the spring-summer 2014 cycle in San Mateo Atenco, Mexico State, Mexico, with the objective of estimating variance and heritability components in 39 faba bean cultivars and identifying outstanding genetic material from quantitative traits and qualitative. A randomized complete block design with three replications was used. The qualitative characteristics were described according to the technical guide for the varietal description in faba bean of the national service of inspection and certification of seeds (SNICS). The results showed statistical significance (p≤ 0.01) among cultivars for each quantitative characteristic. Heritability in the broad sense varied from 30.7 to 99%. The highest seed yield was recorded in the collections identified as T8 (4.16 t ha-1), T5 (3.9 t ha-1) and T 27 (3.8 t ha-1). The principal components analysis explained 65.2% of the original total variation and in this it was observed that the yield correlated positively and significantly with number of pods, pod weight and seed weight. In the cluster analysis four groups were formed, of which the third of these included the faba bean populations with the best agronomic descriptors evaluated.

Keywords: Vicia faba L.; analysis of morphological and agronomic characters; High Valleys of Central Mexico; multivariate analysis

Resumen

Este estudio se realizó en el ciclo primavera-verano de 2014 en San Mateo Atenco, estado de México, México, con el objetivo de estimar los componentes de varianza y la heredabilidad en 39 cultivares de haba e identificar material genético sobresaliente a partir de caracteres cuantitativos y cualitativos. Se utilizó un diseño experimental de bloques completos al azar con tres repeticiones. Los caracteres cualitativos se describieron de acuerdo con la guía técnica para la descripción varietal en haba del servicio nacional de inspección y certificación de semillas (SNICS). Los resultados mostraron significancia estadística (p≤ 0.01) entre cultivares para cada carácter cuantitativo. La heredabilidad en sentido amplio varío de 30.7 a 99%. El mayor rendimiento de semilla se registró en las colectas identificadas como T8 (4.16 t ha-1), T5 (3.9 t ha-1) y T 27 (3.8 t ha-1). El análisis de componentes principales explicó 65.2% de la variación total original y en éste se observó que el rendimiento se correlacionó positiva y significativamente con número de vainas, peso de vaina y peso de semilla. En el análisis de conglomerados se formaron cuatro grupos, de los cuales el tercero de éstos incluyó a las poblaciones de haba con los mejores descriptores agronómicos evaluados.

Palabras clave: Vicia faba L.; análisis de caracteres morfológicos y agronómicos; análisis multivariado; Valles Altos del Centro de México

Introduction

The study of variability based on morphological and agronomic traits is a fundamental tool in the genetic improvement schemes and in the efficient conservation of germplasm (Pearce et al., 2000; Cordeiro et al., 2003). The faba bean is a partially allogamous species, which makes it more expensive and difficult to maintain the genetic identity of the cultivars (Pearce et al., 2000; Duc et al., 2010), which is why creole or native materials of time have fixed genes of interest, represent an important source of germplasm (Yahia et al., 2012).

For two decades there have been intensive studies on the phenotypic variability that exists in traits of agronomic interest: in the Mediterranean, Suso et al. (1993); Terzopoulos et al. (2003), in Germany and France it has found wide variability in flowering, earliness, growth habit, architecture stem, internode length, number of branches, kind of growth and stiffness of the stem (Arbaoui et al., 2008), in Syria has been reported wide variety pigmentation stem, size and shape of the leafs, color stain of melanin in the wing and the standard angle shape, surface, color and distribution of the pods, and in different colors in the seed, in the testa and in the hilium (Robertson and El-Sherbeeny, 1991), in Ethiopia the faba beans are different mainly in the size of the leaves and in the position and color of the pods.

In China, Li-juan et al. (1993) found that the cultivars differed basically in the size of the pod, in the number of seeds per pod and in the color of the seed. The health, size and color of the seeds are very important characteristics for Mexican farmers, and they use them to identify outstanding cultivars (Díaz et al., 2008; Escalante et al., 2012). Duc et al. (2010) reported nearly 38 000 faba bean accessions grouped into 37 collections, mostly from Asia, Africa and Europe. In America and particularly in Mexico, there is no reliable gene bank that protects the genetic diversity of the existing germplasm.

The genetic improvement and the generation of technology in this legume is incipient, the farmers of this region of Central Mexico are the owners of the native populations that they have selected empirically and also they are of the technological package that they use in their exploitation (Díaz et al al., 2008; Rojas et al., 2012; Orozco et al., 2013; Pérez et al., 2014).

In the previous context, the main objective of the present study was to describe 23 agronomic characters in 39 faba bean cultivars collected in the Toluca-Atlacomulco Valley, Mexico, based on the technical guide of the SNICS seed variety description (2001), for identify outstanding materials that allow its recommendation in commercial sowing, initiate new breeding programs or generate technology.

Materials and methods

Description of the study area

This work was carried out in the Spring Summer 2014 cycle in the Barrio de Guadalupe, Municipality of San Mateo Atenco, State of Mexico, Mexico, located at 99⁰ 31’ 10’’ North latitude and 99° 34’ 05’’ West longitude, at 2 570 masl. The predominant soils are of alluvial origin and 87% of its surface are of the feozem type. The common climate is C (w2) (w) b (i’’) g; that is, temperate sub-humid, with long summer and winter rain. Its average temperature varies from 10 to 12 °C and the precipitation ranges between 700 and 900 mm (García, 1988).

Genetic material

39 cultivars of faba bean, 35 of these were collected in the Mexiquenses Municipalities of Acambay, Jocotitlan, Calimaya, Mexicaltzingo, Santa Cruz Atizapan, Santiago Tianguistenco, Almoloya del Río, Toluca, Zinacantepec, Metepec, Lerma and San Felipe del Progreso were considered. The other four were formed by the Agricultural, Aquaculture and Forestry Research and Training Institute of the State of Mexico (ICAMEX). In the Table 1 shows the identification code, the place of collection, the characteristics of the seeds, the altitude and the geographic coordinates of the municipalities where they were collected.

Table 1 Identification code, place of collection, altitude and geographical coordinates where the collection sites of the 39 accessions are located. 

Code Collection place Altitude (m) Geographical coordinates
T1, T2, T3, T4, T5, T6, T8, T9 Acambay 2 440 19° 57’ 16’’ N 99° 50’ 39’’ O
T7 Jocotitlán 2 200-3 400 19° 42’ 26’’ N 99° 47’ 12’’ O
T10, T11, T12, T13, T14, T15 Calimaya 2 690 19°10’ 25’’ N 99°37’ 02’’ O
T16, T17, T18, T19, T34
T20 Mexicaltzingo 2 600 19° 13’ 15’’ N 99° 33’ 05’’ O
T23 Santa Cruz Atizapán 2 600 19° 09’ 27’’ N 99° 29’ 19’’ O
T21, T22, T24, T25, T37 Santiago Tianguistenco 2 622 19° 10’ 08’’ N 99° 28’ 01’’ O
T26, T33, T35 Toluca 2 680 19° 17’ 32’’ N 99° 39’ 14’’ O
T27 Zinacantepec 1 160 19°17’ 00’’ N 99° 44’ 00’’ O
T28 Almoloya del Rio 2 610 19°10’ 00’’ N 99° 29’ 00’’ O
T29, T30, T31, T32, T39 Metepec 2 635 19° 15’ 04’’ N 99° 36’ 17’’ O
T36 Lerma 2 570 19° 17’ 05’’ N 99° 30’ 43’’ O
T38 San Felipe del Progreso 2 570-2 650 19° 57’ 16’’ N 99° 50’ 39’’ O

Institute of Information and Geographic, Statistical and Cadastral Research of the State of Mexico (2011).

Experimental design and size of the plot

The 39 cultivars were established in the field in a randomized complete block design with three replications. The plot consisted of three rows of 4 x 0.8 m and the central furrow was the useful plot (3.2 m2).

Agronomic management

The preparation of the land was mechanical. Planting took place on April 20, 2014. Organic fertilization consisted in applying 2.5 t ha-1 of cattle manure. Two irrigation assistance was provided after sowing (May 7 and June 7), two weeds were made (May 17 and June 8) and weed control was manual. The harvest was made after the genetic material reached physiological maturity.

Registered variables

Ten plants were chosen as a sampling unit in each of the useful experimental units and 23 variables were recorded: 12 qualitative and 11 quantitative. The quantitative variables were number of stems (NT), number of knots (NN), number of leafs (NF0), percentage of flowering (PF), number of flowers per node (NFN), number of pods per plant (NVP), pod weight (PVP, g), number of seeds per pod (NSV), weight of 100 seeds (P100S, g). The seed weight was recorded by experimental plot (PSP) and with this the grain yield per hectare (RHA) was estimated. The qualitative variables registered with the technical guide for the varietal description of faba beans of the national service of inspection and certification of seeds (SNICS, 2000) were: habit of growth (HC), height of plant (AP), coloration of anthocyanins (CA), color of the foliage (CF) extension of the anthocyanin coloration in the flower (ECA), presence of the melanin spot in the wing (PMM), color of melanin spot in the wing (CMMA), melanin spot in the standard (MME), anthocyanin coloration on the standard (CAE), pot size (PV), degree of pod curvature (GCV), green pod coloring intensity (ICVV), seed shape (FS), color of the seed (CS) and presence of hilium (PH).

Statistical analysis

An analysis of variance was made, and its mean squares were used to calculate the components of variance and broad-spectrum heritability (H2), the latter considered as an estimator of the genetic variability between accessions (Pérez et al., 2007). A comparison of means between cultivars was also performed with the Tukey test (α= 0.01). The arithmetic means of each cultivar for the 11 quantitative variables were used to obtain a data matrix: the cultivars were assigned to the rows and the values of each variable to the columns. With this matrix we obtained the analysis of the main components (ACP, Sánchez, 1995) and conglomerates (method of the unweighted arithmetic mean, UPGMA Method). Both analyzes were performed with the statistical analysis system Statistical Analysis System (SAS, 1988), but the biplot graph was made with Microsoft Excel 2010, using the scores of the first two main components (Pérez et al., 2009).

Results and discussion

Variance analysis

In the present study (Table 2) it was observed that the effects between cultivars were highly significant in number of knots (NN), percentage of flowering (DAF), number of flowers per plant (NF), pods per plant (NVP), weight of pod per plant (PVP), number of seeds per pod (NSV), weight of 100 seeds (P100S), weight of seed per plot (PSP) and yield per hectare (RHA). These results are similar to those reported by Yahia et al. (2012) and allow to deduce that for these variables the identification of outstanding genetic material is possible.

Table 2 Mean squares and statistical significance of the values of F for the quantitative variables. 

FV GL NT NN NFo PF NFN
Repetitions 2 0.681ns 1.44 ns 1.64 ns 1.44 ns 0.7 ns
Treatments 38 2.39* 8.16** 0.16 ns 192.59** 0.63 **
Error 76 1.41 1.17 0.11 23.5 0.16
Total 116
CV (%) 18.59 10.5 6.89 26.73 9.06
X 6.39 10.3 4.85 18.13 4.51

**= significant at 0.01; *= significant at 0.05; ns= not significant; FV= source of variation; CV= coefficient of variation; GL= degrees of freedom; NT= number of stems; NM= number of knots; NFo= number of leafs; PF= percentage of flowering; NFN= number of flowers per knots.

Table 2 Mean squares and statistical significance of the values of F for the quantitative variables (continuation). 

FV GL NVP PVP NSV P100S PSP RHA
Repetitions 2 2.03 ns 72.23 ns 0.071 ns 121.53 ns 16.38 ns 0.097 ns
Treatments 38 347.3 ** 5326.08 ** 0.21 ** 4857.08 ** 4274.45 ** 3.878 **
Error 76 0.99 16.21 0.027 327.84 7.9 0.102
Total 116
CV (%) 5.65 4.99 9.46 9.55 4.3 15.57
X 17.65 80.63 1.74 189.59 65.36 2.06

**= significant at 0.01; *= significant at 0.05; ns= not significant; FV= source of variation; CV= coefficient of variation; GL= degrees of freedom; NVP= number of pods per plant; PVP= pod weight per plant; NSV= number of seeds per pod; P100S= weight of 100 seeds; PSP= weight of seeds per plot; RHA= yield per hectare (RHA).

Components of variance and heritability

The components of variance (CV) are evaluated in terms of response to the selection and the use of the moment method, calculated with its linear functions, allows estimating the genetic variability (H2) that exists between cultivars when using the mean squares of the analysis of variance (Shimelis and Shringani, 2010). In the present study it was observed that in the majority of quantitative traits the H2 varied from 30.7 to 99.8% (Table 3).

Table 3 Components of variance and heritability in a broad sense (H2) in 11 quantitative variables evaluated in 39 faba bean cultivars. 

Variable σG2 σf2 H2
NT 0.32 0.79 40.5
NN 2.33 2.72 85.6
NFo 0.016 0.052 30.7
PF 53.36 61.19 87.2
NFN 0.15 0.2 75
NVP 115.4 115.73 99.7
PVP 1769.9 1775.3 99.6
NSV 0.061 0.07 87.1
P100S 1509.7 1618.9 93.2
PSP 1422.18 1424.81 99.8
RHA 125 128 97.6

Number of stems (NT); number of knots (NN); number of leafs (NFo); flowering percentage (FP); number of flowers (NF); number of pods per plant (NVP); pod weight per plant (PVP); number of seeds per pod (NSV); weight of 100 seeds (P100S); seed weight per plot (PSP) and yield per hectare (RHA).

In quantitative traits, such as seed yield, it is desirable that H2 values are greater than 50% (Filippeti and Ricciardi, 1988; Khare and Singh, 1991; Bakheit, 1992) to contribute to a greater response to selection or to optimize the genotype x environment association. Alan and Geren (2007) reported heritabilities less than 50% in plant height (29%), number of stems (17.6%), pods per plant (3%), seeds per pod (47%) and weight of 100 seeds (30%).

Principal component analysis

In the biplot that was constructed with the cultivars and the variables, it was observed that the main components 1 (41.6%) and 2 (23.6%) explained 65.2% of the original total variation (Figure 1).

Figure 1 Interrelations between 39 faba bean cultivars (in number) and 11 agronomic variables (in letter).  

Sánchez (1995); Pérez et al. (2009) mentioned that this percentage is desirable to interpret reliably the approximate correlations that exist between both. The dispersal of the 39 cultivars in the four quadrants of the biplot suggests that there is genetic variability that is available to initiate a new breeding program. Phenotypic variability was detected in 39 collections faba bean was higher in NN, PF, NF, NVP, PVP, P100S, PSP and RHA. Collecting 8 (T8) from Tixmadejo, Municipality of Acambay, he showed a yield of 4.16 t ha-1, more than the national average value is 0.99 t ha-1. T8 also showed superiority in number of knots (11.76), flowering percentage (90%) and pod weight per plant (152.83 g), followed by P5 (Pueblo Nuevo, Acambay) and P27 (Santa Cruz Cuauhtenco, Zinacantepec) (Table 4).

Table 4 Comparison of means of 11 agronomic variables. 

Code NT NN NFo PF NFN NVP
T1 7.7 a 11.73 ab 4.93 a 87.53 ab 4.43 a 26.93 e-g
T2 7.56 a 10.56 a-d 4.76 a 79.44 ab 4.73 a 23.33 g-h
T3 7.56 a 10.96 a-c 4.93 a 86.84 ab 4.43 a 25.03f-h
T4 4.43 a 11.3 a-c 5.03 a 75.59 a-c 4.5 a 22.33 h-i
T5 7.66 a 11.3 6 a-c 5.2 a 79.44 ab 4.56 a 37.5 b
T6 5.83 a 8.63 a-f 4.46 a 64.41 a-d 3.9 ab 14.03 kl
T7 6.1 a 11.36 a-c 4.8 a 77.06 ab 4.26 a 33.7 c-d
T8 6.7 a 11.76 ab 5.1 a 90.9 a 4.86 a 35.5 b-c
T9 6.1 a 10.43 a-d 4.86 a 57.28 a-f 4.6 a 29.03 e
T10 5.93 a 10 a-e 4.53 a 64.51 a-e 4.5 a 3.73 o-p
T11 7.73 a 9.96 a-e 4.46 a 63.41 a-e 4.76 a 7.5 n
T12 5.7 a 10.96 a-c 4.73 a 59.14 a-g 4.46 a 12.06 lm
T13 7.2 a 11.3 a-c 5.06 a 62.2 a-e 4.46 a 12.66 lm
T14 5.1 a 10.63 a-d 4.8 a 53.79 a-g 4.63 a 13.36 kl
T15 5.56 a 10.86 a-c 4.86 a 45.78 a-g 4.53 a 12.36 lm
T16 5.9 a 11.2 a-c 4.6 a 51.17 a-g 4.26 a 7.7 n
T17 6.33 a 11 a-c 4.96 a 72.39 a-c 5 a 16.53 j-k
T18 6.63 a 10.56 a-d 5 a 63.89 a-e 4.56 a 8.1 n
T19 5.4 a 10.93 a-c 5.03 a 63.79 a-e 4.4 a 7.16 no
T20 6.66 a 11.43 a-c 5.1 a 69.13 a-c 4.53 a 23.43 g-h
T21 6.56 a 9.96 a-e 4.7 a 69.13 a-c 4.93 a 9.03 m-n
T22 7.03 a 10.76 a-d 4.76 a 72.03 a-c 4.76 a 13.93 kl
T23 5.73 a 10.36 a-d 4.5 a 57.44 a-g 4.23 a 12.66 lm
T24 6.26 a 11.96 a 4.83 a 75 ab 4.6 a 16.93 j-k
T25 7.26 a 11.66 ab 5.1 a 80.64 ab 4.93 a 21.76 h-i
T26 5.2 a 11.03 a-c 4.8 a 56.1 a-g 4 a 16.76 j-k
T27 7.56 a 11.8 ab 4.93 a 79.11 ab 4.9 a 27.6 e-f
T28 6.1 a 10.3 a-e 4.36 a 63.79 a-e 4.4 a 3.43 p
T29 5.73 a 4.7 f 4.56 a 0 g 2.43 b 48.23 a
T30 6.5 a 10.93 a-c 5.26 a 60.36 a-g 5.36 a 23.03 h
T31 5.83 a 9.73 a-e 4.86 a 46.66 a-g 4.06 a 18.9 i-j
T32 5.83 a 11.36 a-c 4.96 a 71.89 a-c 4.9 a 29.36 e
T33 6.96 a 06.3 e-f 4.86 a 2.024 f-g 4.8 a 5.56 n-p
T34 6.43 a 10.96 a-c 4.66 a 38.7 b-g 4.53 a 2.9 p
T35 7.93 a 6.83 d-f 5.36 a 2.024 f-g 4.83 a 12.16 lm
T36 6.13 a 11.73 ab 5.13 a 75.75 ab 4.83 a 30.03 de
T37 7.03 a 7.8 b-f 4.76 a 9.58 e-g 4 a 7.8 n
T38 7.96 a 7.46 c-f 4.66 a 11.22 d-g 4.7 a 7.4 no
T39 4.56 a 8.96 a-e 4.8 a 25.42 c-g 4.3 a 9.1 m-n

NT= number of stems; NN= number of knots; NFo= number of leaflets; PF= percentage of flowering; NFN= number of flowers; NVP= number of pods per plant. Mean values with the same letter within each column are statistically equal (Tukey, p = 0.01).

Table 4 Comparison of means of 11 agronomic variables (continuation). 

Code PVP NSV P100S PSP RHA
T1 112.23 ef 1.73 c-e 186.8 b-k 100.66 fg 3.1 a-f
T2 133.43 c 1.8 cd 236.13 b-d 107.63 d-f 3.33 a-e
T3 91.66 gh 2.5 a 142.63 h-l 71.23 ij 2.16 e-l
T4 109.36 f 1.83 b-d 209.07 b-h 97.46 fg 2.96 b-g
T5 139.40 a-c 2.03 a-d 170 d-l 127.3 ab 3.9 ab
T6 64.56 k-n 1.56 de 141.33 i-l 26.56 s-v 0.82 m-p
T7 151.23 ab 1.63 de 139.73 j-l 115.13 cd 3.56 a-c
T8 152.83 a 1.73 c-e 190.6 b-k 135.2 a 4.16 a
T9 130.73 cd 2.03 a-d 181.6 c-k 105.23 d-g 3.23 a-e
T10 16.9 tu 1.63 de 167.73 e-l 12.2 wx 0.37 p
T11 48.7 o-r 1.5 de 241.33 bc 36.03 p-s 1.1 k-p
T12 52.56 n-q 1.63 de 187.87 b-k 44.36 n-p 1.33 j-p
T13 69.86 j-m 1.46 de 237.6 bc 58.06 k-m 1.76 h-m
T14 60.86 l-o 1.6 de 184 c-k 48.53 m-o 1.46 i-p
T15 64.9 k-n 1.63 de 213.33 b-g 52.56 l-n 1.6 i-o
T16 39.53 q-s 1.53 de 191.8 b-k 27.8 s-v 0.86 m-p
T17 77 h-k 1.63 de 197.87 b-k 65.9 jk 2 f-m
T18 44.7 p-r 1.6 de 202.93 b-j 32.7 q-t 0.99 l-p
T19 29.3 st 1.8 cd 148 g-l 21 u-w 0.65 op
T20 103.06 fg 1.73 c-e 177.33 c-l 82.76 h 2.53 c-i
T21 39.3 q-s 1.63 de 165.73 f-l 29.63 r-u 0.92 m-p
T22 73.06 i-l 1.7 c-e 215.47 b-f 59.6 kl 1.8 g-n
T23 46.56 o-r 1.93 a-d 133.87 kl 33.8 q-s 1 l-p
T24 127.56 cd 1.43 de 334.93 a 114.4 c-e 3.53 a-d
T25 87.26 hi 1.8 cd 167.2 e-l 76.7 hi 2.36 d-j
T26 87.5 hi 1.56 de 195.33 b-k 65.43 jk 2 f-m
T27 136.33 bc 2.03 a-d 222.93 b-f 123.06 bc 3.8 ab
T28 16.73 tu 1.63 de 163.83 f-l 12.33 wx 2.6 c-i
T29 137.86 bc 2.43 ab 111.2 l 107.7 d-f 3.3 a-e
T30 125.86 c-e 1.63 de 209.6 b-h 112.23 de 3.43 a-d
T31 82.5 h-j 1.53 de 194.67 b-k 72.43 h-j 2.2 e-k
T32 117.23 d-f 1.9 a-d 177.47c-l 104.63 e-g 3.23 a-e
T33 36 rs 1.93 a-d 207.87 b-i 23.26 t-v 0.72 n-p
T34 11.1 u 1.16 e 159.87 f-l 9.1 x 0.28 p
T35 55.3 m-p 1.53 de 166.53 f-l 40.7 o-q 1.23 j-p
T36 134.76 c 1.93 a-d 158.4 f-l 95.06 g 2.93 b-h
T37 52.8 n-q 2.26 a-c 252 b 39.43 o-r 1.2 j-p
T38 29.26 st 1.83 b-d 175.33 c-l 18.23 v-x 0.56 op
T39 54.7 n-p 1.56 de 234.27 b-e 43.03 n-q 1.3 j-p

PVP= pod weight per plant; NSV= number of seeds per pod; P100S= weight of 100 seeds; PSP= weight of seed per plot; RHA= yield per hectare. Mean values with the same letter within each column are statistically equal (Tukey, p= 0.01).

These results are similar to those observed by Neal and Mcvetty (1983) who concluded that 68.5 to 76.4% of the variability in seed yield is due to the number of pods produced per plant (Singh et al., 1987; De Costa et al., 1997; Chaieb et al., 2011), to seeds per pod (Alan and Geren, 2007), to the weight of 100 seeds (Baginsky et al., 2013) and to the size of the seed (Al-Refaee et al., 2004; Mohammed et al., 2013). Although the number of pods per plant has been considered by many authors as the main source of variation in the yield of the faba bean crop (under very favorable conditions there is an excess of pods and also of abortions), the number of seeds per square meter (depending on the number of pods) is the factor that most affects performance.

Conglomerate analysis

In the dendrogram of Figure 2, when cutting at an average distance between conglomerates of 0.8 units, four groups were identified. In group IV only cultivar 24 was observed, from Santiago Tianguistenco, with significant values in NN, NFo, NFP and P100S, it was the highest with respect to all populations and had 3.53 t ha-1.

Figure 2 Grouping of 39 faba bean cultivars based on 11 agronomic variables. Method of grouping unweighted pairs with arithmetic means (UPGMA method).  

These results are similar to those found by Alan and Geren (2007) and Baginsky et al. (2013), who commented that these characters have an important influence on performance.

In group II, cultivars identified as T7 and T29, from Los Reyes, Jocotitlan and San Isidro de Metepec variety, respectively, showed desirable characteristics in NT, NFo, PVP and produced more than 3 t ha-1, group I was made up of T1, T32, T9, T36, T5, T8, T2, T27, T4, T30, T3, T26, T31, T17, T20 and T25, the first 13 belong to the northern and central part of the Valley Toluca-Atlacomulco, the last three to the south-east zone, in terms of the agronomic traits evaluated is the most important group because it agglomerates the best populations. In contrast, in group III the rest of the cultivars were classified with the lowest average values. Such results coincide with Duc et al. (2010), who commented that the response of genotypes is differential, since the adaptation to the environment and its interaction with it is determinant in a desirable phenotypic expression.

Qualitative characteristics

The identification of genetic variability between and within cultivars allows selecting varieties with desirable agronomic characteristics and contributes to the partial increase of the production and quality of the faba bean seed. The varietal description allows an easy and rapid discrimination between phenotypes (Franco and Hidalgo, 2003), they are generally considered highly heritable characteristics, easily detected with the naked eye and with little or no variation through the environments (Pérez et al., 2007). In this investigation, phenotypic differences were observed in the 39 populations in determinate (D) growth habit (HC) and gray-green color, except for T29 (San Isidro) that was green and T35 that was bluish green, 12 cultivars showed anthocyanin coloration in foliage, the extent of anthocyanin coloration was large only in T8, in 23 populations was medium and in 15 small, the presence of melanin spot was recorded by all populations, the color of the spot was brown, there was presence of melanin spot but with absence of coloration (Tables 5 and 6).

Table 5 Plant and foliage characteristics of 39 faba bean populations collected in the Valley Toluca-Atlacomulco, Mexico. 

Code Plant Foliage
HC A CA C
T1 D M P VG
T2 D M P VG
T3 D M P VG
T4 D M P VG
T5 D A P VG
T6 D A A VG
T7 D A P VG
T8 D A P VG
T9 D M P VG
T10 D A A VG
T11 D A A VG
T12 D A A VG
T13 D M A VG
T14 D M A VG
T15 D M A VG
T16 D M A VG
T17 D A A VG
T18 D M A VG
T19 D M P VG
T20 D A P VG
T21 D M A VG
T22 D M A VG
T23 D M A VG
T24 D A A VG
T25 D M A VG
T26 D M A VG
T27 D A A VG
T28 D M A VG
T29 D B A V
T30 D M P VG
T31 D A A VG
T32 D A A VG
T33 D M A VG
T34 D M A VG
T35 D M A VA
T36 D M P VG
T37 D M A VG
T38 D M A VG
T39 D M A VG

Habit of growth; D= determined; I= indeterminate; A= height; B= low; M= medium; A= high; CA= anthocyanin coloration; P= present; A= absent; C= color; V= green; VA= bluish green; VG= grayish green.

Table 6 Flower characteristics of 39 faba bean populations collected in the Valley Toluca-Atlacomulco, Mexico. 

Code Flower
LF ECA PMM CM MM CA
T1 G M P C P A
T2 G M P C P A
T3 G P P C P A
T4 G M P C P A
T5 G M P C P A
T6 G M P C P A
T7 G M P C P A
T8 G G P C P A
T9 G M P C P A
T10 G P P C P A
T11 G M P C P A
T12 G M P C P A
T13 G P P C P A
T14 G M P C P A
T15 G P P C P A
T16 G P P C P A
T17 G M P C P A
T18 G P P C P A
T19 G P P C P A
T20 G P P C P A
T21 G M P C P A
T22 G M P C P A
T23 G P P C P A
T24 G P P C P A
T25 G M P C P A
T26 G M P C P A
T27 G P P C P A
T28 G M P C P A
T29 M P P C P A
T30 G M P C P A
T31 G P P C P A
T32 G P P C P A
T33 G M P C P A
T34 G M P C P A
T35 G M P C P A
T36 G M P C P A
T37 M M P C P A
T38 G M P C P A
T39 M P P C P A

LF= flower length; M= median; G= large; ECA= extension of anthocyanin coloration; P= small; M= median; G= large; PMM= presence of melanin spot P= present; A= absent; CM= color of the stain; C= brown; MM= melanin stain; P= present; A= absent; CA= coloration of anthocyanins; P= present; A= absent).

The pod size was semi-erect in 26 populations, erect in eight and horizontal in five, this is important for producers since an recto angle of the pod favors physiological maturity, mechanized harvest and resistance and tolerance to drought (Gresta et al., 2009), there was no degree of curvature in 24 populations, two were of medium curvature and 13 weak, the green intensity of the pod was medium in 20 populations, weak in 13 and strong in six. The shape of the seed was ovate in 21 populations, oblong in 15, elliptical in two and only in T29 was rectangular, the color of the seed was light brown in all the populations except in T30 that was marbled, all the materials presented hilium (Table 7).

Table 7 Pod and seed characteristics of 39 faba bean populations collected in the Toluca Valley. 

Code Pod Seed dry
PV GCV ICVV FS CS PH
T1 SE A M O CC P
T2 E A M O CC P
T3 E A M O CC P
T4 H M D E CC P
T5 E A D O CC P
T6 SE D D E CC P
T7 SE D M O CC P
T8 E A M O CC P
T9 SE A M Ov CC P
T10 E D M Ov CC P
T11 SE A M Ov CC P
T12 SE A M Ov CC P
T13 SE A F Ov CC P
T14 H D F Ov CC P
T15 H D F Ov CC P
T16 SE A D Ov CC P
T17 SE A M Ov CC P
T18 SE D D Ov CC P
T19 SE D D Ov CC P
T20 SE A M Ov CC P
T21 H D F Ov CC P
T22 E A D Ov CC P
T23 SE D F O CC P
T24 SE A M Ov CC P
T25 SE A M Ov CC P
T26 SE D M O CC P
T27 SE A D O CC P
T28 SE D D Ov CC P
T29 E A M R CC P
T30 SE A D O J P
T31 SE D D O CC P
T32 SE A D O CC P
T33 SE D F O CC P
T34 H M D O CC P
T35 E A M O CC P
T36 SE A M Ov CC P
T37 SE A M Ov CC P
T38 SE A M Ov CC P
T39 SE A M Ov CC P

PV= pod size; SE= semierect; E= erect; H= horizontal; GCV= degree of curvature of the pod. A= absent, D= weak; M= median; ICVV= intensity of green color of the pod. D= weak; M= median; F= strong; FS= shape of the seed; O= oblong; E= elliptical; O = ovate; R= rectangular; CS= color of the seed; CC= light brown, J: marbled; PH= presence of hillium; P= present.

The morphological characters of qualitative type, such as habit of growth of the leaves and flowers, among others, are those that allow the visual identification of the genotypes in the field, but a greater or lesser uniformity and adaptation of the genotypes will influence their use final by the producers (Madriz and Luciani, 2002).

Conclusions

The principal component and conglomerate analyze allowed to identify cultivars 8, 5 and 27 as superior in seed yield. Wide phenotypic variability was also observed in NN, PF, NF, NVP, PVP, P100S, PSP (H2 values of 75 to 99.8%). In relation to the qualitative characteristics, little phenotypic variability was detected in the evaluated characters.

Literatura citada

Alan, O. and Geren, H. 2007. Evaluation of heritability and correlation for seed yield and yield components in faba bean (Vicia faba L.). J. Agron. 6(3):484-487. [ Links ]

Al-Reface, M.; Turk, M. and Tawaha A. 2004. Effect of seed size and plant population density of yield and yield components of local faba bean (Vicia faba L. Mayor). Inter. J. Agric. Biol. 2:294-299. [ Links ]

Arbaoui, M.; Link, W.; Satovi, Z. and Torres, A. M. 2008. Quantitative trait loci of frost tolerance and physiologically related trait in faba bean (Vicia faba L.) Euphytica. 164(1):93-104. [ Links ]

Baginsky, C.; Silva, P.; Auza, J. and Acevedo, E. 2013. Evaluation for fresh consumption of new broad bean genotypes with a determinate growth habit in central Chile. Chilean J. Agric. Res. 73(3):225-232. [ Links ]

Bakheit, B. R. 1992. Shambat 104. A new faba bean cultivar for the Gezira, Sudan. FABIS Newsletter. 30:20-22. [ Links ]

Chaieb, N.; Mohamed, B. and Mars, M. 2011. Growth and yield parameters variability among faba bean (Vicia faba L.) genotypes. J. Natural Products Plant Res. 1(2):81-90. [ Links ]

Cordeiro, G. M.; Pan, Y. B. and Henry, R. J. 2003.Sugarcane microsatellites for the assessment of genetic diversity in sugarcane germplasm. Plant Sci. 165(1):181-189. [ Links ]

De Costa, W. A. J. M.; Dennet, M. D.; Ratnaweera, U. and Nyalemegbe, K. 1997. Efects of different water regimes on field -grown determinate and indeterminate faba bean (Vicia faba L.). II. Yield, yield components and harvest index. Field Crops Res. 52:169-178. [ Links ]

Díaz, B. M.; Herrera, C. B. E.; Ramírez, J. J.; Aliphat, F. M. and Delgado, A. A. 2008. Conocimiento campesino en la selección de variedades de haba (Vicia faba L.) en la sierra norte de puebla, México. Interciencia. 33(8):610- 615. [ Links ]

Duc, G.; Bao, S. Y.; Baum, M.; Redden, B.; Sadiki, M.; Suso, M. J.; Vishniakova, M. and Zong, X. X. 2010. Diversity maintenance and use of Vicia faba L. genetic resources. Field Crops Res. 115:270-278. [ Links ]

Filippetti, A. and Ricciardi, L.1988. Development of new determinate growth habit in Vicia faba L. Mayor. Analysis of cross between determinate mutant and autofertile line. Genética Agraria. 42:299-316. [ Links ]

Franco, L. T. e Hidalgo, R. 2003. Análisis estadístico de caracterización morfológica de recursos filogenéticos. Boletín técnico núm. 8. Instituto Internacional de Recursos Filogenéticos (IPGRI). Cali, Colombia. 89 p. [ Links ]

García, E. 1988. Modificaciones al sistema de clasificación climática de Köppen. Instituto Nacional de Geografía-UNAM. México, DF. 246 p. [ Links ]

Gresta, F.; Avola, G.; Albertini, E.; Raggi, L. and Abbate, V. 2009. A study of variability in the Sicilian faba bean landrace ‘Larga di Leonforte’. Genetic Res. Crop Ev. 57(4):523-531. [ Links ]

IGECEM. 2011. Instituto de Información e Investigación Geográfica-Estadística y Catastral del Estado de México. Gobierno del Estado de México. https://www.portal2.edomex.gob.mx/igecem/productosy/index.htm. [ Links ]

Khare, D. and Singh, C. B. 1991. Genetic behavior of yield and quality traits of Vicia faba L. New Phytopathologist. 72:293-298. [ Links ]

Li-juan, L.; Zhao-hai, Y.; Zhao-jie, Z.; Ming-shi, X. and Han-qing, Y. 1993. Study and utilization of faba bean germplasm resources. In: Saxena, M. C.; Weigand, S.; Li-juan, L. (Eds.). Faba Bean in China: State-of-the Art Review. ICARDA Press Ch. 4. 51-63 pp. [ Links ]

Madriz, I. P. M. y Luciani, M. J. F. 2002. Caracterización morfológica de 20 genotipos de frijol mungo (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek). Rev. Facultad de Agronomía de la Universidad Central de Venezuela. 28(1):27-39. [ Links ]

Mohammed, O. A. A.; Hamid, A. A. and Bakheit, G. M. 2013.Correlaction between seed yield components in Faba bean (Vicia faba L.). Adv. Environ. Biol. 7(1):82-85. [ Links ]

Neal, J. R. and Mcvetty, P. B. E. 1983.Yield structure of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) grown in Manitoba. Field Crops Res. 8:349-360. [ Links ]

Orozco, C. N.; Pérez, L. D. J.; González, H. A.; Franco, M. O.; Gutiérrez, R. F.; Rubí A. M.; Castañeda, V. A. y Balbuena, M. A. 2013. Identificación de poblaciones sobresalientes de haba colectadas en el Estado de México. Rev. Mex. Cienc. Agríc. 4(6):921-932. [ Links ]

Pearce, S. R.; Harrison, G.; Li, D.; Heslop-Harrison, J. S.; Kumar, A. and Flavell, A. 2000. The Ty1-copia group retrotransposon in Vicia species: copy number, sequence heterogeneity and chromosome localization. Mol. Gen. Gen. 250:305-315. [ Links ]

Pérez, D. J.; González, A. Sahagún, J.; Vázquez, L. M.; Franco, O. and Domínguez, A. 2009. The identification of outstanding potato cultivars using multivariate methods. Ciencia e Investigación Agraria. J. Agric. Nat. Res. 36(3):391-400. [ Links ]

Pérez, L. D. J.; Vásquez, G. L. M.; Sahagún, C. J. y Rivera, P. A. 2007. Variabilidad y caracterización de diez variedades de papa en tres localidades del Estado de México. Rev. Chapingo Ser. Hortic. 13(1):13-19. [ Links ]

Robertson, L. D. and El-Sherbeen, M. 1991. Distribution of discreetly scored descriptors in a pure line faba bean (Vicia faba L.) germplasm collection. Euphytica. (57):83-92. [ Links ]

Rojas, T. J.; Díaz, R. R.; Álvarez, G. F.; Ocampo, M. J. y Escalante, E. A. 2012. Tecnología de producción de haba y características socioeconómicas de productores en Puebla y Tlaxcala. Rev. Mex. Cienc. Agríc. 3(1):35-49. [ Links ]

Sánchez, G. J. J. 1995. El análisis biplot en clasificación. Rev. Fitotec. Mex. 18:188-203. [ Links ]

SAS. 1988. Statistical Analysis System. SAS/STAT User’s Guide-Release 6.03 edition Cary, NC. SAS Institute Inc.1028 p. [ Links ]

Shimelis, H. and Shiringani, R. 2010. Variance components and heritabilities of yield and agronomic traits among cowpea genotypes. Euphytica. 176:385-389. [ Links ]

Singh, S. P.; Singh, N. P. and Pandey, R. K. 1987. Irrigation studies in faba bean. Fabis Newsletter. 18:24-26. [ Links ]

SNICS. 2001. Servicio Nacional de Inspección y Certificación de Semillas. Guía técnica para la descripción varietal de haba (Vicia faba L.). 12 p. https://www.sagarpa.gob.mx/snics/haba.3.doc.2002. [ Links ]

Suso, M. J.; Moreno, M. T. and Cubero, J. I. 1993. New isozyme markers in Vicia faba: inheritance and linkage. Plant Breeding. 40:105-111. [ Links ]

Terzopoulos, P.; Kaltsikes, P. and Bebeli, P. 2003.Collection, evaluation and classification of Greek populations of faba bean (Vicia faba L.). Gen. Res. Crop Evol. 50:373-381. [ Links ]

Yahia, Y.; Guetat, A.; Elfalleh, W.; FeRchichi, A.; Yahia, H. and Loumerem, M. 2012. Analysis of agromorphological diversity of southern Tunisia faba bean (Vicia fabaL.) germplasm. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 11(56):11913-11924. [ Links ]

Received: January 01, 2019; Accepted: March 01, 2019

Creative Commons License Este es un artículo publicado en acceso abierto bajo una licencia Creative Commons