SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.9 número5Sustratos de basura verde para cultivo de geranio (Pelargonium spp.) en contenedorEfecto de las giberelinas en el rendimiento de chile jalapeño (Capsicum annuum L.) índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Revista mexicana de ciencias agrícolas

versão impressa ISSN 2007-0934

Rev. Mex. Cienc. Agríc vol.9 no.5 Texcoco Jun./Ago. 2018

https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v9i5.1501 

Articles

Characterization of seasonal corn producers in Tierra Blanca, Veracruz

José Gabriel Jaramillo Albuja1  § 

Benjamín Valeriano Peña Olvera1 

José Hilario Hernández Salgado1 

Ramón Díaz Ruiz1 

Alejandro Espinosa Calderón2 

1Postgraduate College-Campus Puebla. Federal Highway Mexico-Puebla km 125.5b, (Currently Blvd. Forjadores de Puebla) Puebla, Puebla. Tel. 01(222) 2850013. (bpena@colpos.mx; jhhernan@colpos.mx; dramon@colpos.mx).

2Valley of Mexico Experimental Field -INIFAP. Highway Los Reyes-Texcoco km 13.5, Coatlinchan, Texcoco, State of Mexico. CP. 56250. Tel. 01(800) 0882222, ext. 85328. (espinosa.alejandro@inifap.gob.mx).


Abstract

Maize is one of the main crops in Mexico due to the fact that it plays an important role in the diet of the Mexican, the main source of supply of this grain in the national market comes from around 2.6 million small producers who grow this cereal in areas smaller than five hectares and also represents one of the fundamental pillars for the food security of rural families who are generally in conditions of marginalization and poverty. The objective of this article is to characterize seasonal maize producers in 14 localities of the Municipality of Tierra Blanca, Veracruz state, which have high and medium marginalization rates. In this sense and to understand the productive management processes of the farmers, this research was carried out to understand the economic, social and productive aspects associated with maize yields under rainy season conditions in the spring - summer 2015 cycle, with the design of a questionnaire, information was collected through personalized interviews with the producers. The results showed that the producers have an average of 55 years of age with 5.5 years of schooling, each family has about 4 members, the average size of the plots is 11.28 hectares/producer, 94.3% uses improved seed and achieve a yield average of 2.8 t ha-1 with an average density of 31 948 plants ha-1. The main animals that were found in the lots or backyards were: chickens, pigs, bovines.

Keywords: marginalization; poverty; yields

Resumen

El maíz es uno de los principales cultivos de México debido entre otros factores a que juega un rol importante en la dieta del mexicano, la fuente principal de abastecimiento de este grano en el mercado nacional proviene de alrededor de 2.6 millones de pequeños productores que cultivan este cereal en superficies menores a cinco hectáreas y además representa uno de los pilares fundamentales para la seguridad alimentaria de la familias rurales que generalmente se encuentran en condiciones de marginación y pobreza. El presente artículo tiene por objetivo caracterizar a los productores de maíz de temporal de 14 localidades del municipio de Tierra Blanca, estado de Veracruz, que tienen índices de marginación altos y medios. En este sentido y para comprender los procesos de gestión productiva de los agricultores se realizó esta investigación para entender los aspectos económicos, sociales y productivos asociados con los rendimientos de maíz bajo condiciones de temporal en el ciclo primavera-verano 2015, con el diseñó de un cuestionario se recopiló información mediante entrevistas personalizadas con los productores. Los resultados mostraron que los productores tienen en promedio de 55 años de edad con 5.5 años de escolaridad, cada familia tiene alrededor de 4 integrantes, el tamaño promedio de las parcelas es de 11.28 hectáreas/productor, 94.3% utiliza semilla mejorada y alcanzan un rendimiento promedio de 2.8 t ha-1 con una densidad promedio de 31 948 plantas ha-1. Los principales animales que se encontraron en los solares o traspatios fueron: gallinas, cerdos, bovinos.

Palabras clave: marginación; pobreza; rendimientos

Introduction

In Mexico, the agricultural sector is a fundamental pillar in the economy and development of the country. The importance lies in the functions it performs such as food security, the conservation of the environment, the rural landscape and the contribution to the viability of rural areas by favoring a more balanced territorial development (Ayala and García, 2009; Creciente, 2002). In 1994, the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) was signed; however, in this way, the state's agroindustries were liquidated, the installed capacity for the production and distribution of fertilizers and seeds, the agricultural extension service, the regulation of prices, the control of imports and practically the development bank. For the field, the adjustment included the dismantling of instruments, institutions and resources designed for the inclusion of family production and a clear change of interlocution that probably had its clearest manifestation in the classification in 1988 of business producers with productive potential and the rest that were disengaged from productive policies to allocate them to the non-productive subsidy regime through direct transfers (Chapela et al., 2014).

Agro-businesses and large export-oriented corporations to the United States dominate the rural landscape of Mexico and are determining factors in public policies that favor them in the face of family agriculture (Palacio and Cavalotti, 2013). The difference between corn producers in Mexico and the United States of America is abysmal: the size of the farms is 21 times larger in the United States of America, direct subsidies are 18 times higher and yields almost quadruple the Mexicans Robles (2013), NAFTA has become a strategic axis to force the modernization of the agricultural sector, producers who met the immediate conditions to raise productivity, reduce costs and sell at competitive prices have been the beneficiaries of this structural change , around 5% of the total, the producers that have not been able to do so correspond to 95% of the total, are condemned to the displacement of the market, their production to be replaced by food imports and raw materials from their commercial partners (Salinas, 2004).

On the other hand, the neoliberal model has increased the levels of poverty and marginalization of large sectors of the population, this model uses massive and growing food imports, putting the sovereignty and food security of the country at risk due to the low production levels of the country. most of the farmers in the field and their families, as well as the increase in poverty, hunger and malnutrition in the majority of the population, especially those living in rural regions (Rubio, 2001), in this sense the development local is a strategy designed to improve the standard of living of specific population groups, is located in the broad dimension of a process of social transformation that requires the rethinking of relationships with nature (Orozco et al., 2007).

Therefore, the knowledge of the communities and social actors is of vital importance to understand the dynamics of the relationship between the population and their economic, social, cultural, political and environmental environment, as well as to enhance their possibilities to appropriate their development process (Salas, 1994), under this scenario the diversification of activities of small farmers and peasants constitutes a survival strategy that is developed through the combination of activities (agricultural and non-agricultural) that can be developed inside or outside the production units (in or out of the community where producer is located (Sacco et al., 2007). In this sense, producers seek more efficient alternatives for their production systems or change their crops for others that may offer them greater profitability; in the case of traditional farmers and most of the country, the solution is not in changing the crops, but in making viable their production system due to other factors that have a culture and economy based on corn (Calva, 1991).

In this context, Mexican agriculture is characterized by developing under a bimodal system in which peasant and business production units coexist (Schejtman, 1981), where the size of the plot has become an indicator of the type of production unit and the distribution of income in the field, thus about 3 million producers grow basic grains in Mexico in an area of more than 14.2 million hectares, almost one million of them cultivate plots no larger than one hectare and only absorb 7.8% of the surface, 53% work plots with extensions between one and five hectares, in 39% only 472 thousand producers exploit larger units and absorb more than 53.5% of the working surface (De Ita, 2003).

The corn in Mexico, is produced in two agricultural cycles: spring-summer and autumn-winter under various conditions of climate and humidity (seasonal and irrigation), the production of corn under seasonal conditions is one of the main activities of the rural sector (Maya et al., 2010). At the national level, it is sown in more than eight million hectares, of which 2.5 million correspond to the tropical region, 17.57% of the national surface is cultivated under irrigation conditions and 82.43% is cultivated under temporary conditions (SIAP, 2014), in charge mainly of more than 2 million small-scale producers who plant it mainly for self-consumption, more than half of the national production of corn comes from this system, which is also known as subsistence because it contributes significantly to the safety of the poorest rural strata (Sánchez et al., 2000; Mera, 2009; Turrent et al., 2012).

In the state of Veracruz, the area sown with corn is just over 566 thousand hectares with an average yield of 2.2 t ha-1 (SIAP, 2014). In this state an average of 200 thousand producers are dedicated to the cultivation; the majority sow from 1 to 3 hectares and are located mainly in marginalized regions and with medium or low productive potential, whose production destination is basically self-consumption (INEGI, 2007), the state of Veracruz has a high social lag index, 59 % of the population lives in poverty, in the municipality of Tierra Blanca there are 93 397 inhabitants, of which: 20.1% suffer from food poverty, 30% poverty of skills and 59.2% poverty of heritage; likewise, 84.68% of the population surveyed in this study has a high marginalization index, that is, there are no opportunities for development and no capacity to find them, the rest of the population has low marginalization indices (CONEVAL, 2014).

In the municipality of Tierra Blanca there are a total of 555 hectares dedicated to the cultivation of corn, of which 285 ha; that is, 51.35% are cultivated under temporary conditions with an average yield of 3.82 t ha-1 (SIAP, 2014). Under this aspect and considering that the cultivation of corn is the central axis of food security especially of small producers who generally live in conditions of marginalization, poverty and inequality of opportunities, this article aims to determine the socioeconomic characteristics and estimate the yields of temporary maize in 14 localities of the Municipality of Tierra Blanca of the state of Veracruz by means of the evaluation of the productivity levels of corn hybrids of normal quality and of high protein quality to identify the maximum seed prices that the farmers would be willing to pay.

Materials and methods

The research was conducted in Tierra Blanca, a municipality located in the Veracruz coastal plain of 8.54983° 27’ north latitude and - 96.28645° 21’ west longitude, has a total of 94 087 inhabitants and 26 691 homes, the municipality is made up of 325 localities; nevertheless, the study covered only 14 localities that are characterized by high and medium marginalization indices (CONEVAL, 2014).

The information was collected through personal interviews through previously structured surveys that included social, economic and productive questions related to the cultivation of corn, the sample size considered a universe of 520 producers who received support from PROCAMPO with corn seed of improved varieties CP 569 and hybrids Biogene and Dekalb in 2015, the simplified formula was used for simple random sampling for proportion estimation but with the maximum variance condition (Taro and Cochran, 1977), as well a sample size of 81 producers was obtained where the yield estimation was performed, the data obtained at the plot level were calculated by means of the correlation analysis of the variables: plant density and average corn yield (t ha-1), this information it was corroborated by regression analysis to obtain the highest precision and accuracy of the results.

To understand the economic and social aspects associated with maize yields, a questionnaire was applied to 70 of the 81 farmers in the yield estimation, this difference in the number of producers surveyed is mainly due to the fact that the informants could not be located the days that were planned for the survey of the information, for which, the value of the accuracy was recalculated obtaining a value of 0.12.

Results and discussion

Social component

The average age of the heads of family surveyed is 55 years, with 5.5 years of schooling, 25.7% of the interviewees acknowledged not having any school year, 78.6% of the producers know how to read and write, 27.2% attended at least four years of study, 31.4% completed primary school and others (15.7%) presented between 9 and 12 years of schooling (Figure 1).

Figure 1 Level of education as a social component in the municipality of Tierra Blanca, Veracruz. 

In this respect, Alvarez et al. (1985), mention that the level of schooling is associated with a greater use of technology and that increasing schooling increases the income. The average number of members of the families is five, 50% of the households have between one and four members and the other 50% have between five and eight. All the interviewees are engaged in agriculture, however in the case of women (30%) they also did housework and raising animals; 2.9% is also a student and 2.8% guaranteed to do extra work on the farm as a day laborer or employee with payments ranging from $150.00 to $200.00 a day. The execution of agricultural and non-agricultural activities has always been a basic survival strategy for peasant families (De Grammont, 2009).

Agricultural component

The average surface of the properties that the interviewees possess was 11.28 ha, the minimum of 1 and the maximum of 12 hectares destined to different productive activities, of which 2.5 ha are for the cultivation of corn, 94.3% of the producers mentioned to be owners of these lands; however, 4.3% indicated that they lend their properties and 1.4% give them in rent. The usufruct of the land is: 90% ejidal and 10% small property, with respect to the humidity regime, 94.2% of the producers carry out temporary agriculture and the rest have some irrigation system. In the state of Veracruz, they are engaged in the cultivation of maize in an average of 200 thousand producers, most of them sowing from 1 to 3 hectares, located mainly in marginal regions and with medium or low productive potential and whose destination of production is basically self-consumption (Palafox et al., 2013).

The 85.7% of the respondents said that the maize storms are made in the months of June July when the rainy season begins, the use of improved seed in the municipality is 94.3% and the rest corresponds to the use of creole materials 90% of the seed used by respondents comes from the City Council through the Municipal Rural Development Secretariat of Tierra Blanca, which is offered to producers through economic subsidies, i.e. the city subsidizes 50% of the real price of the seed, the other 50% is paid by the farmer, the sowing method that presented the highest frequency of use in the study area is the speck, as represented by 71.7% of the interviewees.

Corn production technology

In Mexico, around 8 million hectares are planted each year, of which 2.5 million correspond to the tropical region. In the state of Veracruz, the area sown is 530 thousand hectares with an average yield of 2 t ha-1. The sowing is distributed in two agricultural cycles, 380 thousand hectares in rainy or spring-summer and 150 thousand of residual moisture (Tapachole) and irrigation that develop during the autumn-winter cycle (Palafox et al., 2013). In the localities where the research was conducted, the results showed that in 2015 the area cultivated with corn was 197 hectares, of which 177 hectares were cultivated for grain and 20 hectares for fodder.

The agronomic management of the crop includes practices of: soil preparation, date of sowing, cultural work, density of sowing, application of fertilizers and pesticides, among others that the producer carries out during the crop cycle and the way in which they are combined the factors of production in each of the practices (Palafox et al., 2013), in this sense 75.7% of the respondents made the passage of a harrow, 74.3% of the producers applied at least one herbicide prior to sowing, and the furrow was performed by 58.6% of the population under study. With regard to cultural work or crop maintenance, 97.14% of the producers made at least one fertilization and 58.6% of the interviewees applied some insecticide to control crop pests. The main fertilizer used by producers is urea, 87.1% of respondents reported, followed by ammonium sulfate with 17.1% and diammonium phosphate-DAP with 11.4% in the study area, Table 1 shows the number of producers and the type of fertilizers they use in the seasonal corn crop cycle.

Table 1 Number of producers and fertilizers applied in the cultivation of rainfed maize in Tierra Blanca. 

Fertilizer Number of producers
Yes (%) No (%)
Urea 61 87.1 9 12.9
Ammonium sulphate 12 17.1 58 82.9
DAP 8 11.4 62 88.6
Triple 17 11 15.7 59 84.3
Triple 16 3 4.3 67 95.7
Organic 3 4.3 67 95.7
Foliar 2 2.9 68 97.1
21-10-20 1 1.4 69 98.6

Source: data obtained from the survey carried out in the field.

On the other hand, the results of the estimation of maize yields of rainfed in the study area were 2.8 t ha-1 with an average population density of 31 948 plants ha-1, in this respect the town that obtained the highest yields was the locality of “Nuevo Arroyo Tambor” with 4.13 t ha-1 with an average density of 49 395 plants ha-1 (Table 2).

One of the factors related to the low production of corn is the density of plants, Tinoco et al. (2002), indicates that for improved varieties of low and intermediate size should be used about 62 500 plants. The population density is considered as the most important controllable factor to obtain higher yields in crops.

Planting density in maize exerts a high influence on grain yield and agronomic characteristics, since grain yield increases with population density until it reaches a maximum point and decreases when density increases beyond this point. Sangoi (2000), indicates that population density is one of the factors that often changes the producer to increase grain yield, however if population densities are used greater than the optimum increases the competition for light, water and nutrients, causing reduction in root volume, number of ears, amount and quality of the grain per plant and increase the frequency of root and stem rots, which favors low population densities cause problems with weeds or waste of soil (Maya and Ramírez, 2002; Njoka et al., 2005).

Table 2 Density of plants and average yields t ha-1 of seasonal maize in 14 localities of the Municipality of Tierra Blanca. 

Location Average density (plants ha-1) Average yield (t ha-1)
Arroyo Tambor 49 395 4.13
The Tuna 41 060 2.6
Loma Caballo 39 811 3.90
Campana 39 128 3
Cazadero 35 894 2.98
The Jicaro 35 295 1.99
Conchas 33 711 3.67
San Nicolas 33 100 2.54
Paso Magueyito 30 948 3.54
Mata Maguey 27 824 2.96
San Francisco 27 808 2.79
The prietas 24 034 1.96
Plan of Villa 23 445 2.02
Lazaro Cardenas 23 178 2.8
Nueva Reforma 14 583 1.26

Source: data obtained from the survey carried out in the field.

The correlation analysis (Figure 2) of the variables plant density and average yield t ha-1 indicated that there is a positive correlation (r= 0.98; p= 0.01), while the regression analysis showed a linear trend (R2= 0.96; Y= 0.0677x + 0.482); however, the relationship between grain production and population density is complex, since the best response in grain yield varies according to the condition of soil, climate, cultural practices and genotype (Pinter et al., 1994; Sangoi, 2000), work done on population densities in maize hybrids under temporary in the humid tropics showed that increasing the density from 50 000 to 62 500 plants ha-1 obtained the highest grain yield since the yield increased by 0.30 t ha-1 (Cano et al., 2001). On the other hand, Carrera and Cervantes (2006) reported that the yield increased 0.6 t ha-1 by increasing the population density from 60 000 to 70 000 plants ha-1.

Figure 2 Effect of population density on average yield t ha-1 of seasonal maize in the municipality of Tierra Blanca. 

Production, consumption and sale of grain

Corn is a key crop for Mexico, in the period 2016-2017 the consumption of corn grain in the country was approximately 38.7 million tons of which 23.3 million tons corresponds to white corn and 15.3 million tons is yellow corn (FIRA, 2016), the producers related to the research, stated that of the total production of grain they obtain, they reserve an average of 1 800 kg ha-1 for family self-consumption but the producers affirmed that on average they buy 690 kg of maize for human and animal consumption generally in the months of September and October, 34% of respondents produce corn solely for self-consumption, while 66% of producers sell corn in the town or in the municipal seat, 85% of these said that the grain of corn they buy has lower quality compared to the one they produce and sell, however, the corn was sold at an average of $3.50 kg, and they bought it at $5.00 kg; that is, the product is losing on average $1.5 kg of purchased corn.

Livestock component

The raising of animals in rural areas and mainly of small producers constitutes a survival strategy that is related to agricultural activities and that together are aimed at the food sovereignty of producers, the result of the surveys showed that producers have total 2 022 animals, including birds (chickens), cattle (cows, bulls, calves), sheep and pigs, being Lazaro Cardenas the town that has the largest number of hens with a total of 259 birds/town, Villa Plan presented 103 heads of cattle/locality, Loma Caballo a total of 36 porcines/locality and The Prietas reached 29 sheep/locality. In Figure 3, it presents in summary the type and number of animals by location.

Figure 3 Number of animals by location in the Municipality of Tierra Blanca, Veracruz. 

Castaños (2009) assures that the backyard livestock is a system characterized by the raising of a group of animals such as birds, horses, cattle, pigs, goats, sheep and cattle, the importance of livestock for peasant families lies mainly in that the products obtained can be used for self-consumption, and in case of economic necessity, they are used for sale, partially ensuring the survival of the family (Gutiérrez, 2007). Raising pigs (Sus scrofa ssp.) generates income from their sale on foot, most of them are fed with waste or kitchen and harvest leftovers. Likewise, sheep (sheep) (Ovis aries), goats (Capra hircus), hens (Gallus gallus) and turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo) are part of the diet of the producers, they are the main food at parties, which have a great importance in these communities, given that it is through this type of events that the peasant family as a social unit maintains and consolidates networks and relations with other farmers (López et al., 2012).

Under these considerations, it was determined that the raising of the animals of the producers of Tierra Blanca constitutes a strategy that provides food for self-consumption in addition to becoming a means to solve some type of need, in this sense 84.3% of the producers raise chickens with an average of 17 birds/producer, 96.6% of these animals are reared under backyard or solar conditions, likewise, the surveys showed that 61.4% of the people who participated in this research have an average of 6 cows/producer, 58.6% of cattle are reared in paddocks adjacent to the site, pigs (47.1%) are reared in lots or backyards, 58.6% of producers have an average of three animals. In the Table 3 shows the type of livestock and the frequency of producers who are also engaged in the cultivation of corn to raise animals.

On the other hand, 52.6% of the producers said that when corn production has good yields this helps to solve animal problems such as feeding, investment and disease control because they manage to satisfy the nutritional needs of the animals, In addition, there is availability of capital to make investments to improve the breeding of their animals as well as to control diseases, 31.6% indicated that these problems can be aggravated when there is no good production of corn and 15.8% said there is no relation between the yield of corn and the problems of the animals.

Table 3 Type of livestock and number of producers dedicated to raising animals, in the Municipality of Tierra Blanca, Veracruz. 

Animals Yes No
Frequency (%) Frequency (%)
Birds 59 84.3 11 17.7
Cows 43 61.4 27 38.6
Pigs 41 58.6 29 41.4
Calves 36 51.4 34 48.6
Bulls 22 31.4 48 68.6
Sheep 5 7.1 65 92.9

Source: data obtained from the survey carried out in the field.

Conclusions

The main productive activity in the localities evaluated in the state of Veracruz is self-subsistence agriculture, with maize cultivation being the most important with an average of 2.5 ha of cultivated area, with an average yield estimate of 2.8 t ha-1 and an average population density of 31 948 plants ha-1. The producers of the localities that are the product of the present investigation are willing to implement certified corn seeds provided there are guarantees that allow them to obtain higher yields.

The raising of backyard animals such as cows, pigs and chickens, is a strategy that allows the families surveyed to regenerate alternative means of self-consumption and income generation, especially among women. Land tenure in most producers is ejidal, crops are grown under rainfed conditions, water is the most limiting factor for production, plantings are made at the beginning of the rainy season in the months from June and July.

The use of improved seeds (hybrids) predominates in the area, the same ones that have been evidenced in the present investigation that do not adapt in the best way to the area. The fertilizer used as the most used nitrogen source is urea, which is applied preferably in the sowing.

Literatura citada

Álvarez, G.; Martínez, V. y Díaz, C. 1985. La utilización de la tecnología en dos comunidades del Plan Mixteca Alta, estado de Oaxaca; el caso de las recomendaciones para el maíz de temporal. Agrociencia. 113-123 pp. [ Links ]

Ayala, D. A. y García, R. 2009. Contribuciones metodológicas para valorar la multifuncionalidad de la agricultura campesina en la Meseta Purépecha. Economía, Sociedad y Territorio. 31(4):759-801. [ Links ]

Bourgues, R. 2013. El maíz su importancia en la alimentación de la población mexicana. In: el maíz en peligro ante los transgénicos. Álvarez, E. y Piñeyro, A. (coordinadores). UNAM-Centro de Investigaciones Interdisciplinarias en Ciencias y Humanidades-Unión de Científicos Comprometidos con la Sociedad. 203-215 pp. [ Links ]

Calva, J. 1991. Probables efectos de un Tratado de Libre Comercio en el campo mexicano. National Association for Chicana and Chicano Studies Annual Conference. 40-45 pp. [ Links ]

Calva, J. 2004. Ajuste estructural y TLCAN: efectos en la agricultura mexicana reflexiones sobre el ALCA. El Cotidiano. 124(19):14-22. [ Links ]

Cano, O.; Tosquy, O. H.; Sierra, M. y Rodríguez, F. A. 2001. Fertilización y densidad de población en genotipos de maíz cultivados bajo condiciones de temporal. Agron. Mesoam. 12(2):199-203. [ Links ]

Carrera, J. A. y Cervantes, T. 2006. Respuesta de la densidad de población de cruzas de maíz tropical y subtropical adaptadas a Valles Altos. Rev. Fitotec. Mex. 4(29):331-338. [ Links ]

Castaños, M. 2009. Materia orgánica. Manual agroecológico para productores y extensionistas rurales. Universidad Autónoma Chapingo (UACH). 9-442 pp. [ Links ]

Chapela, G. y Menéndez, C. 2014. México: políticas para la agricultura campesina y familiar; In: Políticas públicas y agriculturas familiares en América Latina y el Caribe, Balance, desafíos y perspectivas. Sabourin, E.; Samper, M. y Sotomayor, O. (Coord.). Santiago de Chile, Chile. 208-228 pp. [ Links ]

Cochran, W. G. 1977. Técnicas de muestreo. Ed. CECSA; México, DF. 103-149 pp. [ Links ]

CONEVAL. 2014. Consejo Nacional de Evaluación de la Política de Desarrollo Social. La pobreza en la población indígena de México, 2012. México. 157 p. [ Links ]

De Grammont, H. 2009. La nueva estructura ocu pacional en los hogares rurales mexicanos. In: la pluriactividad en el campo latinoamericano. Martínez, L. (Coord.). Quito, Ecuador. 273- 307 pp. [ Links ]

De Ita R., A. 2003. Los impactos socioeconómicos y ambientales de la liberalización comercial de los granos básicos en el contexto del TLCAN: el caso de Sinaloa. Centro de estudios para el cambio en el campo mexicano. 53 p. [ Links ]

De la Cruz, L.; Córdova E.; Orellana, H.; Estrada, M.; Mendoza, J.; Gómez, A. y Brito, N. 2009. Rendimiento de grano de genotipos de maíz sembrados bajo tres densidades de población. Universidad y Ciencia. 1(25):93-98. [ Links ]

De Loma, E. 2008. El derecho a la alimentación. Definición, avances y retos. Boletín ECOS. 4-10 pp. [ Links ]

FAO. 2010. Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Agricultura y la Alimentación el estado de la inseguridad alimentaria en el mundo. La inseguridad alimentaria en crisis prolongadas. Italia, Roma. 60 p. [ Links ]

FIRA. 2016. Fideicomisos Instituidos en Relación con la Agricultura Panorama Agroalimentario. Dirección de Investigación y Evaluación Económica y Sectorial. Maíz 2016. https://www.gob.mx/cms/uploads/attachment/file/200637/panorama-agroalimentario-ma-z-2016.pdf. [ Links ]

Fuller, A. and Brun, A. 1991. Farm family pluriactivity in Western Europe: partial results of a research programme funded by the EC Commission and National Agencies. The Arkleton Trust (Research) Limited, United Kingdom. 6(4):361-373. [ Links ]

García, L. y García, R. 1992. La modernización de la pobreza: dinámicas de cambio técnico entre los campesinos temporaleros de México. Estudios Sociológicos. 10(29):263-288. [ Links ]

Guillén, H. 2001. De la integración cepalina a la neoliberal en América Latina. Comercio exterior. 51(5):359-361. [ Links ]

Gutiérrez, T.; Segura C.; López, B.; Santos, R.; Sar miento, F.; Carvajal, H. y Molina, C. 2007. Características de avicultura de traspatio en el muni cipio de Tetiz, Yucatán, México. Trop. Subtrop. Agroecosys. 3(7):217-224. [ Links ]

INEGI. 2007. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía VIII Censo Agrícola, Ganadero y Forestal. Síntesis Metodológica. Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e informática. [ Links ]

López, J. L.; Parra, F.; Damián, M. A.; Álvarez, F. y Zuluaga, G. P. 2012. La economía de traspatio como estrategia de supervivencia en San Nicolás de los Ranchos, Puebla, México. Geografía Agrícola. 51-62 pp. [ Links ]

Marín, G.; Riestra, O.; Exebio, G. y Martínez, G. 1989. Respuesta del maíz CP-561 a presión poblacional, nitrógeno y balance hídrico bajo temporal en la Región Central Costera de Veracruz. Agrociencia. 12(2):193-197. [ Links ]

Maya, A., Uzcanga, A.; De La Rosa, A. y Góngora, S. 2010. Actualización de la priorización de las cadenas agroalimentarias y agroindustriales del estado de Campeche, INIFAP-Fundación Produce Campeche. Informe técnico. 72 p. [ Links ]

Maya, J. B. y Ramírez, J. L. 2002. Respuesta de híbridos de maíz a la aplicación de potasio en diferentes densidades de población. Rev. Fitotec. Mex. 4(25):333-338. [ Links ]

Mera, L. 2009. Aspectos socioeconómicos y culturales. In: origen y diversificación del maíz: una revisión analítica. Kato, T.; Mapes, C.; Mera L.; Serratos, J. y Bye, R. (Eds.). Editorial Impresora Apolo, SA. de CV. México, DF. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM)-Comisión Nacional para el Uso y Conocimiento de la Biodiversidad (CONABIO) México, DF. 33-42 pp. [ Links ]

Njoka, E. M.; Muraya, M. M. and Okumo, M. 2005. Plant density and thinning regime effect on maize (Zea mays) grain and fodder yield. Austr. J. Exp. Agric. 44(12):1215-1219. [ Links ]

Orozco, M. E. y Canales, M. 2007. Fundamentos para el estudio del desarrollo local rural. Territorio y Sociedad. La dimensión de los agentes actuantes, Quivera. 1:306- 327. [ Links ]

Palacio, V. y Cavallotti, B. 2001. Globalización, apertura comercial y sector agropecuario. In México rural: políticas para su reconstrucción. Mata, B.; Villanueva, C. y Hernández, A. (Coord.). Primera Edición. Ciudad de México, México. 393 p. [ Links ]

Palafox, A.; Sierra, M.; Rodríguez, F. A.; Barrón, S. 2013. Comportamientos Agronómicos de Híbridos y variedades de maíz validados en la región tropical de Veracruz manual para la producción de maíz para los estados de Veracruz y Tabasco. In. tópicos selectos en agronomía tropical. Libro técnico núm. 9. Veracruz, México. 113 p. [ Links ]

Pinter, L.; Afoldi, Z.; Burucs, Z. and Paldi, E. 1994. Feed value of forage maize hybrids varying. In: tolerance to plant density. Agron. J. 86(5):799-804. [ Links ]

Robles, H. 2012. El caso de México. In: dinámica del mercado de la tierra en América Latina y el Caribe: concentración y extranjerización. Soto, F. y Gómez, S. (Eds.). Ciudad de México, México. 307-341 pp. [ Links ]

Rubio, B. 2001. Explotados y excluidos, los campesinos latinoamericanos en la fase agroexportadora neoliberal. Plaza y Valdez. Segunda edición. Ciudad de México, México. 227 p. [ Links ]

Sacco, F. y Velleda, N. 2007. Pluriactividad y agricultura familiar en Brasil: el caso de río Grande do Sul. Revista de la CEPAL 93. 157-174 pp. [ Links ]

Salas, M. y Sánchez, P. 1997. Epistemología y participación: conocimiento es poder si uno lo logra entender. Enfoques participativos para el desarrollo rural. Diálogos. 145 p. [ Links ]

Salinas, E. 2004. Balance general del campo mexicano 1988-2002. El Cotidiano. 19(124):15-13. [ Links ]

Sánchez, J.; Goodman, C. and Stuber, W. 2000. Isozymatic and morphological diversity in the races of maize of Mexico. Springer. 54(1):43-59). [ Links ]

Sangoi, L. 2001.Understanding plant density effects on maize growth and development: an important issue to maximize grain yield. Ciencia Rural. 31(1):159-68. [ Links ]

Schejtman, A. 1981. El agro mexicano y sus intérpretes. Nexos. 39:27-47. [ Links ]

SIAP. 2014. Servicio de Información Agroalimentaria y Pesquera. Estadísticas del cierre de la producción agrícola por cultivo. Ciclo primavera-verano 2007-2011. http://www.siap.gob.mx/cierre-de-la-produccion-agricola-por-cultivo/. [ Links ]

Sierra, M.; Palafox, A.; Rodríguez F.; Espinosa, A.; Gómez, N.; Caballero, F.; Barrón, S.; Zambada A. y Vázquez, G. 2008. H-520, híbrido trilineal de maíz para el trópico húmedo de México. Agric. Téc. Méx. 34(1):119-122. [ Links ]

Taro, Y. 1967. Elementary sampling theory. J. Am. Statistical Assoc. 322(63):728 -730. [ Links ]

Tosquy, O. H.; De la Garza, R.; Castañón, G. y Morones, R. 1998. Fertilización edáfica y densidades de población para producción de semilla de líneas de maíz. Agric. Téc. Méx . 24(2):111-119. [ Links ]

Turrent, A.; Cortés, J. I.; Espinosa, A.; Mejía, H. y Serratos, J. 2010. ¿Es ventajosa para México la tecnología actual de maíz transgénico? Rev. Mex. Cienc. Agríc. 1(4):631-646. [ Links ]

Turrent, A.; Wise, T. and Garvey, E. 2012. Factibilidad de alcanzar el potencial productivo de maíz de México. Mexican Rural Develop. 24-36 p. [ Links ]

UNCTAD. 2013. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. Mexico’s agriculture development: perspectives and outlook. Ginebra, Suiza. 209 p. [ Links ]

Warman, A. 2001. El campo mexicano en el siglo XX. Fondo de Cultura Económica (FCE). Ciudad de México. 262 p. [ Links ]

Received: March 2018; Accepted: June 2018

§Corresponding author: josejaramillo-85@hotmail.com.

Creative Commons License Este es un artículo publicado en acceso abierto bajo una licencia Creative Commons