SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.8 número especial 19Actividad esporicida de la solución electrolizada con pH neutro en hongos de importancia poscosechaDistribución temporal y espacial de la escama blanca del mango en Sinaloa, México índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Revista mexicana de ciencias agrícolas

versão impressa ISSN 2007-0934

Rev. Mex. Cienc. Agríc vol.8 spe 19 Texcoco Nov./Dez. 2017

https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v0i19.669 

Articles

Postharvest quality in ‘Kent’ mango with normal and high fertilization

Yolanda Nolasco-González1  § 

Jorge Osuna-García1 

1Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias. Carretera Internacional México-Nogales km 6; Entrada Santiago Ixcuintla, Nayarit.. México. Tel. 01(55) 38718700, ext. 84417. (nolasco.yolanda@inifap.gob.mx).


Abstract

Fertilization is important to obtain fruit-quality production. This study was conducted during the period from 2010 to 2014 in two ‘Kent’ mango orchards with different soil conditions in Nayarit, whose objective was to evaluate the effect of specific site fertilization on the production and quality of fruits to harvest and until maturity of consumption. Three levels of fertilization were evaluated: 1) normal dose (for a yield of 20 t ha-1); and 2) high dose (normal dose + 50%) and 3) without fertilization (control). Five trees were selected per treatment, marking 20 panicles per tree and harvesting 60 fruits at physiological maturity. Production (kg tree-1), fruit size, external appearance, shell and pulp color, firmness and total soluble solids were determined. After harvest the fruits were stored under market simulation (22 ± 2 °C; 70 ± 10% HR), sampling every third day until consumption maturity. It was found that the production of the high and normal dose was superior to the control without fertilization. There were differences by location, years and fertilization doses on the quality and shelf life of the fruits, in weight loss, peel and pulp color, firmness and total soluble solids during the ripening process for consumption. The normal dose had a better effect in lengthening shelf life, reflecting firmness and pulp color. The other variables did not show differences between high and normal doses, but were higher than control.

Keywords: Mangifera indica L.; fertilization dose; firmness; size; total soluble solids

Resumen

La fertilización es importante para obtener una producción con calidad de fruto. Este estudio se realizó durante el periodo de 2010 a 2014 en dos huertos de mango ‘Kent’ con condiciones diferentes de suelo en Nayarit, cuyo objetivo fue evaluar el efecto de la fertilización de sitio específico sobre la producción y calidad de frutos a cosecha y hasta madurez de consumo. Se evaluaron tres niveles de fertilización: 1) dosis normal (rendimiento de 20 t ha-1); y 2) dosis alta (dosis normal + 50%) y 3) sin fertilización (control). Se seleccionaron cinco árboles por tratamiento, marcando 20 panículas por árbol y cosechando 60 frutos en madurez fisiológica. Se determinó la producción (kg árbol-1), tamaño de fruto, apariencia externa, color de cáscara y pulpa, firmeza y sólidos solubles totales. Después de cosecha los frutos se almacenaron bajo simulación de mercadeo (22 ±2 °C; 70 ±10% HR), muestreando cada tercer día hasta madurez de consumo. Se encontró que la producción de dosis alta y normal fue superior al control. Se presentaron diferencias por localidad, años y dosis de fertilización sobre la calidad y vida de anaquel de los frutos, en pérdida de peso, color de cáscara y pulpa, firmeza y sólidos solubles totales durante el proceso de maduración a consumo. La dosis normal tuvo mejor efecto en alargar la vida de anaquel reflejándose en firmeza y color de pulpa. Las otras variables no presentaron diferencias entre dosis alta y normal, pero fueron superiores al control.

Palabras clave: Mangifera indica L.; dosis de fertilización; firmeza; sólidos solubles totales; tamaño

Introduction

The ‘Kent’ mango is one of the main varieties grown in Mexico. In the northwestern region was the most produced variety with 141 063.9 t, above the varieties ‘Tommy Atkins’ and ‘Ataulfo’ during 2008 (SIAP, 2008). This variety is late and is generally harvested at the end of the season (July-August) which allows a better positioning in the market, making evident the importance of the yield and the quality of the fruit. From 2008 to 2014 in Nayarit yields varied between 7 and 14 t ha-1 (SIAP, 2015), which can be attributed to the lack of a suitable fertilization program to maintain the productivity of orchards. Adequate fertilization that supplies nutrients to the tree during the fruiting stage in quantity and at the right time favors the production, but also the quality and shelf life of the fruits (García et al., 2015).

However, the effect of fertilization on ripening and post-harvest quality of fruits may not be favorable if there is an imbalance of nutrients in fruit tissues, as has been shown in several studies, such as Sharma and Sing (2009) where the deficiencies of B and Ca in mango pulp were related to the development of “Pitting” in the shell, also Lin et al. (2013) attributed it to low levels of Ca in fruit. Another case is the softening of pulp on the tip of the Kent fruit (soft nose), attributed to the low concentration of Ca in the affected area of the fruit (Burdon et al., 1991). Likewise, Assis et al. (2004) found that low concentrations of Ca and Mg and high K/Ca and N/Ca ratio, both in pulp and in shell, are indicative of the appearance of physiological disorders in ‘Tommy A’ mango.

Meanwhile, some authors have found a corrective effect with the foliar application of Ca, resulting fruits with greater firmness and consequently a delay in the evolution of maturation (Romero et al., 2006), which is attributed to the fact that Ca is part of the cell wall with the function of strengthening and regulating the permeability of the same. In cases of excessive fertilization, such as nitrogen, Mackenzie (1993) reported in cvs Keitt and Kent a lower development of yellow in the epidermis and observed greenish spots at leaf concentrations higher than 1.2%; likewise García et al. (2015) mention that the application of high dose of fertilization favored the increase in the green shade of the husk color in ‘Kent’ mango.

Currently the most recommended is to supply the nutrients that are missing in the soil and to restore the mineral elements extracted in the harvest. The study by Xiuchong et al. (2001) in trees with low productivity, in low N and P soils with deficiencies in K, Mg and applied balanced fertilization for four years, resulting in an average of 15 200 kg ha-1 and the quality was improved in color, odor and flavor. Quijada et al. (2008) carried out foliar applications of potassium nitrate (6%) and potassium thiosulfate (1%), increasing tree yield and total soluble solids content in cv. Irwin and Tommy Atkins, on the other side, potassium nitrate increased titratable acidity in both varieties.

According to Salazar (2002), fertilization in a specific site considers the type and quantity of nutrients required in each orchard, so its use increases the production and quality of the fruit in the short term. García et al. (2015), for a production cycle they applied in ‘Kent’ mango three fertilization levels: normal, high (50% of normal) and control (no fertilizer), concluding that the quality and shelf life of fruits was affected by fertilization levels, presented differences in respiratory intensity, firmness, soluble solids, acidity and shell color in the ripening process for consumption. Therefore, this study was carried out with the objective of evaluating the influence of specific site fertilization on the production, fruit size, initial quality, post - harvest life and quality of consumption of cv Kent during 2010 to 2014.

Materials and methods

Two ‘Kent’ mango orchards were selected in the state of Nayarit, with warm subhumid climate (García, 1998) and contrasting soil types, both located at an altitude of 193 m. 1) The orchard of Buenavista, municipality of Acaponeta, located in the northern part of the state at 27’ 22” north latitude and 105º 27’ 00.5” west longitude, with soil Cambisol eutric + Fluvisol eutric + Solonchak ortho (Be + Je + Zo /2) of average texture and average annual precipitation of 1 308 mm and 2) the orchard of Las Palmas, municipality of San Blas, located in the central area of the state at 21º 36’ 41.1” north latitude and 105º 11’ 17” of Acrisol humid soil + Cambisol chromic (Ah+Bc/3P) with fine stony texture and average annual rainfall of 1 453 mm.

From 2010 to 2014, three levels of fertilization were managed; fertilization doses were calculated independently by orchard: 1) normal dose, considering the nutritional demand of the tree to obtain a production target of 20 t ha-1 , the amount of nutrients removed by the fruit, total removal of nutrients, planting density, the amount invested by the tree in its biomass, the efficiency of fertilization, the proportion of nutrients that are recycled by the tree and soil, foliar nutritional diagnosis and commercial product concentration (Salazar, 2002); 2) high dose, with an additional 50% to the normal dose; and 3) control, without fertilization.

Each treatment was applied manually to 20 trees per orchard, in a band of 50 cm in width and 15-20 cm in depth. The distribution was made around the tree and initially at 1.5 m from the trunk. At the time of anthesis, five trees were selected from each treatment and 20 panicles were marked per tree in order to harvest fruits at physiological maturity and similar age to minimize the unevenness of the degree of maturity at harvest, which was performed at 1800 accumulated heat units according to the methodology of Osuna et al. (2007). In each orchard, 60 fruits were harvested per treatment. Quality fruit samples were taken at harvest and then during storage in marketing simulation (22 ±2 ºC; 70 ±10% HR) until consumption maturity. For the fruit size, weight and caliber variable, 50 fruits were evaluated for weight loss 10 fruits and for external appearance, shell and pulp color, firmness and total soluble solids were evaluated 6 fruits per sample.

The fruit size was measured by measuring the length and width (mm) parallel to the seed with a digital vernier model 3415 (Control Company, Friendswood, TX, USA) and weighing the fruit with a portable digital scale with a capacity of 2 000 g and approximation of 0.1 g (Ohaus corp Florham Park, NJ, USA). The caliber indicates the number of fruits that can be placed in a package of 4 536 kg, equivalent to 10 pounds of weight, based on the norm NMX-FF-058-SCFI-2006 and was determined with respect to the weight of the fruit according to established by the mango packers for export. The weight loss was determined periodically until maturity of consumption, being expressed as the difference of weight with respect to the initial weight in percentage.

The external appearance is evaluated with a visual scale where 0= excellent; 1= good; 2= regular; and 3= bad. The shell and pulp color was measured with a portable CR-10 colorimeter (Konica Minolta, Japan). In the shell the color space L*, a* and b* was used, reporting ‘a*’, which indicates the intensity of the green color and its turn to yellow. While in the pulp the color space L*, C and H was used, with ‘Hue’ indicating the tone angle indicating the color tone. The firmness in was measured with a Chatillon Model DFE-050 penetrometer (Ametek Instruments, Largo, FL) equipped with a 10 mm diameter cylindrical punch and was expressed in Newtons (N). Total soluble solids (SST) were reported in °Brix and were determined with a PAL-1 digital refractometer (ATAGO, Japan) by placing 4 to 6 drops of fruit juice to cover the prism.

The evaluations in fruit quality were carried out in the years 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2014; 2010 was considered the base year where fruits harvested from trees were evaluated without fertilization. Fertilization treatments were applied after that first harvest. The experimental design was a completely randomized, using year, locality and treatment factors, with five replicates (trees) per treatment. An analysis of variance and comparison of means was performed with the Waller-Duncan multiple range test (p= 0.05) with the statistical package SAS V. 9.3 (SAS, 2002).

Results and discussion

Production

In 2010, without fertilization, there were significant differences of production between localities. In the Las Palmas orchard there were differences in production, where the trees selected to apply high and normal doses had a higher yield compared to the control, but in general had an average of 73.8 kg tree-1. The following years, already applied fertilization treatments, a trend of increase in productivity was observed in all the treatments, where the control always presented smaller production.

In 2011 production increased and in 2012 decreased, but recovered in 2013. Salazar et al. (2003) applied the FSE in avocado cultivation, obtaining the initial year an intense increase in yield, but the subsequent years showed an effect of moderate alternation in yield. On the other hand, in the orchard of Buenavista there were no differences in yield for 2010, with a mean of 131.8 kg tree-1, but in the following years the normal dose had higher production with respect to the high dose and the control, the latter with the lowest production (Table 1). This indicates that the normal dose is sufficient to improve productivity, since the high dose may not be beneficial and represent an excessive expenditure of fertilizers, but both doses are better than the control. Also, Salazar et al. (2014) in ‘Kent’ mango obtained the highest fruit yield (138.2 kg tree-1) with a normal dose, whereas for ‘Tommy A’ mango the highest yield was obtained with the high dose.

Table 1 Effect of fertilization treatments on fruit production (kg tree-1) of mango ‘Kent’.  

Dosis Año
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Las Palmas, San Blas
Normal 78 ab 148.5 a 57.15 a 163.5 a
Alta 85.5 a 127.5 a 54.3 a 141 a
Control 57.8 b 92.3 b 45.15 a 80.2 b
Buenavista, Acaponeta
Normal 143.3 a 162 a 161 a 166.8 a 154.5 a
Alta 124.5 a 145.5 b 151.9 a 114.0 b 122.3 b
Control 127.5 a 121.5 c 162 a 100.2 c 105 c

Medias con la misma letra en columna son estadísticamente iguales (Waller-Duncan p≤ 0.05).

Fruit size in length, diameter, weight and caliber

The fruits of 2010 without application of treatments had an average weight of 525.8 g and 77% of the fruits had calibres between 8 and 10. In Buenavista fruits were smaller than those of Las Palmas, with 478.6 g and 573 g respectively. Table 2 shows that the effect of year, locality and dose factors had significant differences in size variables except caliber. The gauge is considered to be insignificant because of the wide weight range corresponding to each gauge. By locality, the fruits of Buenavista were superior (427.3 g) with respect to those of Las Palmas (341 g), indicating a positive effect in increase of size, with respect to the base year.

Table 2 Size of ‘Kent’ mango fruits in length, diameter, weight and caliber with application of different fertilization treatments during the years 2011, 2012 and 2014. 

Factor Longitud(mm) Diámetro (mm) Peso(g) Calibre
Año
2011 102.6 b 74.7 c 358.6 c 13.3 a
2012 102.1 b 78.5 b 399.9 b 12.1 a
2014 113 a 79.9 a 447.3 a 13.1 a
Localidad
Las Palmas 98.7 b 74 b 341 b 13.9 a
Buenavista 108.3 a 79.4 a 427.3 a 12 a
Dosis
Normal 105 a 77.3 ab 401.1 a 12 a
Alta 104.5 a 77.7 a 397.2 a 12.2 a
Control 103.9 a 76.7 b 380.2 b 14.2 a

Medias con la misma letra dentro de columna y factor son estadísticamente iguales (Waller-Duncan p≤ 0.05).

In the years of fertilization, there is a tendency to increase in size, where 2014 showed the fruits with higher values in length, diameter and weight, this can indicate a favorable effect of fertilization year after year on the size of the fruits. In the fertilization treatments in terms of length and caliber, there were no significant differences, but there were differences in diameter and weight, where the control had the lowest values compared to the normal and high doses, which were statistically no differences, but numerically the normal dose had fruits of greater weight and consequently smaller caliber, this indicates that the high dose has a less favorable effect and that a high dose is not necessary to obtain fruits of good size.

This agrees with Salazar et al. (2014) where in mango ‘Kent’ with normal and high dose obtained greater production of fruits caliber 12 (350-414 g). According to the Mexican quality standard for fresh export mango the acceptable marketing gauges are between 7 and 14 (648 and 324 g); thus, 100% of the fruits with fertilization had acceptable caliber’s, within a median size.

Weight loss

The weight loss (PP) in fruits from 2010 to 13 DDC did not have significant differences between localities, with 8.2% for Las Palmas and 7.6% in Buenavista. The following years with the application of fertilization treatments, the to consumption was significant for the factors year, locality and treatments (Table 3). By locality, the fruits of Buenavista had greater PP. From harvest to maturity of consumption (12 days), PP in fruits had a tendency to increase, with significant differences between years, where the fruits of 2014 had lower PP (5.2%) and those of 2011 a higher PP (7.4%) to consumption with 12 DDC. At 7 DDC in 2011, a PP of 5.4% was observed, while the fruits of 2012 and 2014 reached those percentages of PP at 12 DDC, indicating an increase in the shelf life of the fruits.

Table 3 Weight loss (%) in ‘Kent’ mango fruits with different fertilization treatments during the years 2011, 2012 and 2014 in two locations 

Factor Etapa de muestreo
Inicial (0 DDC) Intermedia (7 DDC) A consumo (12 DDC)
Año
2011 0 a 5.4 a 7.4 a
2012 0 a 3.4 b 5.6 b
2014 0 a 3.3 b 5.2 c
Localidad
Las Palmas 0 a 3.6 b 4.5 b
Buenavista 0 a 4.6 a 7.2 a
Dosis
Normal 0 a 4.4 a 6.4 a
Alta 0 a 4.2 a 6.2 a
Control 0 a 4 b 5.8 b

Medias con la misma letra dentro de columna y factor son estadísticamente iguales (Waller-Duncan p≤ 0.05).

In mango ‘Kent’ for 12 days at 20 °C a 2.5% PP (Siller et al., 2009) was reported, much lower than that found in this study, which is attributed to storage temperature. In ‘Haden’ mango, 5.8% PP was reported at 9 days at room temperature (Romero et al., 2006). The PP may be due mainly to perspiration occurring through lenticels, as well as increased respiratory metabolism and ethylene production caused by stressful treatment (Mitra and Baldwin, 1997).

Due to the fertilization dose, the control had less weight loss than the normal and high dose, these without significant differences. The above could indicate that the normal and high dose increases the metabolic activity during the maturation process, contrary to what reported by García et al. (2015) in ‘Kent’ mango with high fertilization and control, respiratory intensity was lower. Other studies also report lower respiration during maturation and weight loss by application of Ca in “Haden” mango (Mulkay et al., 2003; Romero et al., 2006).

On the other hand, fruits that present a loss of weight of more than 5%, can produce a commercially unacceptable product (Luna et al., 2006), a value that was exceeded in this study; however, external appearance must be considered to determine acceptability. Although the external appearance data were not shown, it remained excellent to good (0 - 1) from harvest to 12 DDC in consumption and in the treatments there were no significant differences in appearance, being good to excellent from harvest until consumption.

Color of shell

Mango color is one of the most important physicochemical characteristics in the ripening process and one of the main criteria of consumer acceptance (Slaughter, 2009). In the fruits of 2010 the development of color in shell until maturity of consumption (a* = 6.9) was low in comparison with the following years where the fertilization treatments were applied. The trend in the development of color in the shell was to increase the value of a*, starting at negative values and​ reaching positive values for the degradation of chlorophyll and appearance of the carotenoids that provide the yellow colors (Ornelas et al ., 2008). In the Table 4 shows that initially and at 7 DDC there were no significant differences by locality, but at maturity of consumption (12 DDC) there was greater degradation of the green color in the fruits of Buenavista. In the year factor if there were differences in color in the crop, but at maturity of consumption reached similar values.

Table 4 Peel color (a) in ‘Kent’ mango fruits with different fertilization treatments during the years 2011, 2012 and 2014 in two localities. 

Factor Etapa de muestreo
Inicial (0 DDC) Intermedia (7 DDC) A consumo (12 DDC)
2011 -6.9 b -7.1 b 11.1 a
2012 -3.6 a -9.6 a 13.4 a
Localidad
Las Palmas -4.9 a 2.7 a 8.9 b
Buenavista -5.6 a -0.3 a 15.5 a
Dosis
Normal -6.3 a 2.3 a 15.3 a
Alta -5.3 a 0.7 a 8.4 b
Control -4.2 a 0.7 a 13 a

Medias con la misma letra dentro de columna y factor son estadísticamente iguales (Duncan p≤ 0.05).

As for the effect of the doses, on consumption (12 DDC) the high dose presented greater intensity in the green color than the other treatments, which can be attributed to the high amount of nutrients. It has been reported in studies that the presence of nitrogen at the levels of normal and high fertilization in ‘Kent’ mango increased the green tonality of the background color of the fruits (García et al., 2015) and that mango fertilization ‘Tommy Atkins’ with calcium sulfate contributed to maintain the green color of the shell (Arizaleta et al., 2001).

Pulp color

The color change in pulp is due to the appearance of new carotenoid compounds that cause the color to change constantly during the maturation process giving a yellow orange pigmentation of the mesocarp of the mango (Ornelas et al., 2008). Thus, in 2010 it began with an average of H= 83.25°, with no differences between localities, reaching H= 63.7° at maturity of consumption. The decrease in Hue values from harvest to consumption indicates the increase in the intensity of the yellow-orange color in pulp. For the years 2011, 2012 and 2014 with the application of the doses, to harvest the fruits reached the optimum degree, with yellow egg color in 100% of the pulp (H> 83°). Between years of fertilization there were significant differences, with a tendency to decrease color intensity in 2014, presenting higher values, which would indicate that the consecutive fertilization delayed the development of pigmentation in pulp (Cuadro 5).

Table 5 Pulp color (Hue) in ‘Kent’ mango fruits with different fertilization treatments during the years 2011, 2012 and 2014 in two localities. 

Factor Etapa de muestreo
Inicial (0 DDC) Intermedia (7 DDC) A consumo (12 DDC)
Año
2011 81.7 c 76.5 b 69.2 c
2012 82.6 b 74.1 c 73.8 b
2014 90.7 a 88.8 a 78.8 a
Localidad
Las Palmas 81.8 b 73.6 b 70.9 b
Buenavista 85.2 a 81.0 a 74.4 a
Dosis
Normal 84.5 a 78.6 a 74.4 a
Alta 83.4 b 78.5 a 72.2 b
Control 83.7 b 76.8 b 72.4 b

Medias con la misma letra dentro de columna y factor son estadísticamente iguales (Waller-Duncan p≤ 0.05).

The fruits of Las Palmas presented greater development of yellow orange color than those of Buenavista to maturity of consumption (12 DDC). Regarding the doses there were significant differences, the normal developed at all stages of sampling less intensity in pulp color than the discharge and control; but the numerical difference is only two degrees Hue, which visually is imperceptible (Table 5). Larger values (79 ± 3.3°) were reported on ‘Kent’ mango at 12 DDC at 20 °C (Siller et al., 2009). In what reported by García et al. (2015) in mango ‘Kent’ there were no differences between the three levels of fertilization, indicating that there was no effect of fertilization.

Firmness of pulp

In the process of maturation of the mango pulp until maturity of consumption (12 DDC), there was a tendency to decrease the firmness, which is attributed to the degradation of the amyloplasts by hydrolysis of the starches produced in photosynthesis, which when hydrolyzed produce low-molecular-weight carbohydrates soluble in water, which is reflected in the increase of soluble solids (Yashoda et al., 2007). The firmness of the fruits of 2010 did not have significant differences between localities for both harvest and consumption, with 199.8 N and 17.15 N respectively.

In the years with the application of the fertilization doses (Table 6), there were significant differences by locality, where the fruits of Buenavista had more firmness than those of Las Palmas. In the year factor there were significant differences, in 2014 the fruits always maintained more firmness with respect to 2011 and 2012 in all the samplings. This would indicate that as in shell color, there is a cumulative residual effect of nutrients with the application of fertilization with the years that could delay the softening process of the fruits. However, at fertilization doses there were significant differences at harvest, the normal dose had greater firmness than the high dose and control, but all were above the minimum acceptable value of 121.6 N (Báez, 1998).

Table 6 Firmness (N) in ‘Kent’ mango fruits with different fertilization treatments during the years 2011, 2012 and 2014 in two localities. 

Factor Etapa de muestreo
Inicial
(0 DDC)
Intermedia
(7 DDC)
A consumo
(12 DDC)
Año
2011 223.8 b 77.2 b 14.5 b
2012 211.5 b 30.6 c 13.5 b
2014 269.7 a 176.4 a 18.6 a
Localidad
Las Palmas 158.3 b 22.6 b 10.7 b
Buenavista 274.5 a 115.6 a 17.8 a
Dosis
Normal 245.7 a 87.1 a 17.4 a
Alta 227.8 b 88.7 a 13.3 b
Control 210.7 b 59.4 b 14.1 b

Medias con la misma letra dentro de columna y factor son estadísticamente iguales (Waller-Duncan p≤ 0.05).4019

A maturity of control as well as the high dose reached values of firmness below acceptable quality (17.15 - 19.6

N) according to Mitcham and MacDonald (1992), while the normal dose maintained the fruits with greater firmness, which would indicate a favorable effect on the shelf life of the fruits. These results were very different from those reported by García et al. (2015) in ‘Kent’ mango, where the level of high fertilization and control delayed firmness significantly above the normal level in the first five days, but at eight days the control firmness was greater.

Total soluble solids

The total soluble solids (SST) is one of the most interesting physicochemical parameters in the ripening process, as the fruit becomes sweeter and therefore more palatable to the consumer (Quintero et al., 2013). In the year 2010 the TSS from harvest to consumption fluctuated from 7.7 to 17.1 °Brix, while in the following years with the application of the fertilization doses the minimum value at harvest of 7.4 °Brix was exceeded (Báez, 1998), having values between 8.6 and 9.6 °Brix, with significant differences by locality and fertilization treatments, but not for the evaluated years.

The trend of SST content from harvest to maturity always showed a gradual increase (Table 7). The fruits of the locality of Las Palmas from harvest (0 DDC) to maturity of consumption (12 DDC) had higher SST content than Buenavista. At the fertilization doses, the control had the fruits with the highest SST content, reaching 18.2 °Brix. The opposite was for the normal and high dose that developed the fruits with lower SST content, 17.3 and 17.4 °Brix respectively, which were higher than the 13.7 °Brix reported by Siller et al. (2009) at 12 DDC at 20 °C. On the other hand, García et al. (2015) in another similar study obtained results contrary to those obtained in this study, since normal-level fertilization had a greater accumulation of SST than the control.

Table 7 Total soluble solids (°Brix) in ‘Kent’ mango fruits with different fertilization treatments during the years 2011, 2012 and 2014 in two localities. 

Factor Etapa de muestreo
Inicial
(0 DDC)
Intermedia
(7 DDC)
A consumo
(12 DDC)
Año
2011 9.3 a 17.1 a 17.4 a
2012 9.2 a 17.9 a 18 a
2014 9.3 a 15.6 b 17.4 a
Localidad
Las Palmas 10.4 a 19.3 a 19.1 a
Buenavista 8.5 b 15.7 b 16.6 b
Dosis
Normal 8.9 b 16.6 b 17.3 b
Alta 9.4 a 17.6 a 17.4 b
Control 9.5 a 17.2 ab 18.2 a

Medias con la misma letra dentro de columna y factor son estadísticamente iguales (Waller-Duncan p≤ 0.05).

In the years of application of the fertilization doses, there were no significant differences both initially and in consumption. These results show that there is no effect per fertilization dose that is reflected in the development of SST, but the opposite, is diminished for both the normal dose and the high dose.

Conclusions

It was found that the production of the high and normal dose was superior to the control without fertilization. There were differences by location, years and fertilization doses on the quality and shelf life of the fruits, presenting differences in weight loss, peel and pulp color, firmness and soluble solids in the ripening process for consumption. The normal dose had a better effect in lengthening shelf life by reflecting on firmness and pulp color. The other variables did not show differences between high and normal doses, but were higher than control.

Literatura citada

Arizaleta, M. J.; Cárdenas, K. y Manzano, J. E. 2001. Influencia del sulfato de calcio, paclobutrazol y ethrel en el comportamiento postcosecha del mango (Mangifera indica L. Vr. Tommy Atkins). México. Rev. Iberoam. Tecnol. Postcosecha. 4: 30-37. [ Links ]

Assis, J. S. de; Silva, D. J. and Morales, P. L. D. 2004. Nutritional balance and physiological disorders in mango ‘Tommy Atkins’. Brasil. Rev. Bras. Frutic. 26(2):326-329. [ Links ]

Báez, S. R. 1998. Norma mexicana de calidad para mango fresco de exportación. Comité técnico científico de empacadores de mango de exportación A C. (EMEX, AC.) Guadalajara, Jalisco. México. 4 p. [ Links ]

Burdon, J. N.; Moore, K. G. and Wainwright, H. 1991. Mineral distribution in mango fruit susceptible to the physiological disorder soft-nose. USA. Sci. Hortic. 48(3):329-336. [ Links ]

García, E. 1988. Modificaciones al sistema de clasificación climática de Köppen 2a (Ed.). Larios. México. 22-27 pp. [ Links ]

García, M. R.; López, J. A.; Saucedo, V. C.; Salazar, G. S. y Suárez, E. J. 2015. Maduración y calidad de frutos de mango Kent con tres niveles de fertilización. México. Rev. Mex. Cienc. Agríc. 6(4):665-678. [ Links ]

Luna, E. G.; Arévalo, G. M. L.; Anaya, R. S.; Villegas, M. A.; Acosta, R. M. y Leyva, R. G. 2006. Calidad de mango ‘Ataúlfo’ sometido a tratamiento hidrotérmico. México. Rev. Fitotec. Mex. 29(2):123-128. [ Links ]

Lin, H. L.; Shiesh, C. C. and Chen, P. J. 2013. Physiological disorders in relation to compositional changes in mango (Mangifera indica L. ‘chiin hwang’) fruit. USA. Acta Hortic. 984 (984):357-363. [ Links ]

Mckenzie, C. B. 1993. The background skin colors of exported mango fruit in relation to tree nitrogen status. South Africa. South African mango growers’ Association Yearbook. 14: 20-28. [ Links ]

Mitcham, E. J. and McDonald, R. E. 1992. Cell wall modification during ripening of ‘Keitt’ and ‘Tommy Atkins’ mango fruit. USA. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 117: 912-924. [ Links ]

Mitra, S. K. and Baldwin, E. A. 1997. Mango. In: postharvest physiology and storage of tropical and subtropical fruits. Mitra, S. K. (Ed.). CAB International. New York, USA. 85-122 pp. [ Links ]

Mulkay, V. T.; Cáceres, M. I.; Rodríguez, P. J.; Paumier, J. A.; Castro, L. G. T.; Bango, D. G.; Alonso, M. O.; Vallin, B. G. y Suri, A. 2003. Chile. Efectos del poliquel calcio en la calidad postcosecha del mango. Simiente. 73(1-2):16-20. [ Links ]

NMX-FF-058-SCFI-2006. Secretaría de Economía (SE). Productos alimenticios no industrializados para consumo humano-fruta fresca mango (Mangifera indica L.) - especificaciones. Declaratoria de vigencia publicada en el Diario Oficial de la Federación. 07 de abril 2006. [ Links ]

Ornelas, P. J.; Yahia, E. M. and Gardea, A. 2008. Changes in external and internal color during postharvest ripening of “Manila” and “Ataúlfo” mango fruit and relationship with carotenoid content determined by liquid chromatography-APcI+ timeof-flight mass spectrometry. USA. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 50(2):145-152. [ Links ]

Osuna, G. J. A.; Ortega, Z. D. A.; Cabrera, M. H. y Vázquez, V. V. 2007. El uso de unidades calor como una tecnología viable para determinar momento óptimo de cosecha en el mango Ataulfo. Ecuador. Rev. Ecothec. 12-13. [ Links ]

Quintero, V.; Giraldo, G.; Lucas, A. J. y Vasco, L. J. 2013. Caracterización fisicoquímica del mango común (Mangifera indica L.) durante su proceso de maduración. Colombia. Biotecnología en el Sector Agropecuario y Agroindustrial. 11(1):10-18. [ Links ]

Quijada, O.; Herrero, B.; González, R.; Casanova, A.; Castellano, G. y Camacho, R. 2008. Influencia de la poda, de la aplicación de nitrato potásico y tiosulfato potásico sobre la calidad de frutos de variedades promisorias de mango (Mangifera indica L.) en la planicie de Maracaibo Venezuela. México. Rev. Iberoam. Tecnol. Postcosecha. 9(2):121-130. [ Links ]

Romero, G. N.; Sánchez, G. P.; Rodríguez, A. y Saucedo, V. C. 2006. Aplicación foliar de calcio y su relación con la calidad de frutos de mango cv Haden. México. Agric. Téc. Méx. 32: 5-15. [ Links ]

Salazar, G. S. 2002. Nutrición del aguacate, principios y aplicaciones. INIFAP- Instituto de la Potasa y el Fósforo (INPOFOS) (Eds.). Querétaro, México.165 p. [ Links ]

Salazar, G. S. y Lazcano, F. I. 2003. La fertilización en “sitio específico” incrementa los rendimientos y el tamaño de fruta del aguacate en México. In: Actas V Congreso Mundial del Aguacate. Junta de Andalucía Consejería de Agricultura y Pesca (Coord.). AG. Novograf, SA. Sevilla, España. 373-379 pp. [ Links ]

Salazar, G. S.; Santillán, V. G.; Hernández, V. E. F.; Medina, T. R.; Ibarra, E. M. E. y Gómez, A. R. 2014. Efecto a corto plazo de la fertilización de sitio específico en mangos ‘Kent’ y ‘Tommy Atkins’ cultivados sin riego. México. Rev. Mex. Cienc. Agríc. 5(4):645-659. [ Links ]

Sharma, R. R. and Singh, R. 2009. The fruit pitting disorder- aphysiological anomaly in mango (Mangifera indica L.) due to deficiency of calcium and boron. USA. Sci. Hortic. 119:388-391. [ Links ]

SIAP. 2008. Sistema de Información Agroalimentaria y Pesquera. Producción anual por cultivo. http://www.siap.gob.mx/agriculturaproduccion-anual/. [ Links ]

SIAP. 2015. Sistema de Información Agroalimentaria y Pesquera. Producción anual por cultivo. http://www.siap.gob.mx/ agriculturaproduccion-anual/. [ Links ]

Siller, C. J.; Muy, R. D., Báez, S. M.; Araiza, L. E. e Ireta, O. A. 2009. Calidad poscosecha de cultivares de mango de maduración temprana, intermedia y tardía. México. Rev. Fitotec. Mex . 32(1):45-52. [ Links ]

Slaughter, D. C. 2009. Nondestructive maturity assessment methods for mango: a review of literature and identification of future research needs. USA. Biol. Agric. Eng. 1-18 pp. [ Links ]

Xiuchong, Z.; Guojian, L.; Jianwu, Y.; Shaoying, A. and Lixian, Y. 2001.Balanced fertilization on mango in Southerrn China. Canada. Better Crops Inter. 15:16-20. [ Links ]

Yashoda, H. M.; Prabha, T. N. and Tharanathan, R. N. 2007. Mango ripening- role of carbohydrases in tissue softening. England. Food Chem. 102(3):691-698. [ Links ]

Received: March 00, 2017; Accepted: June 00, 2017

Creative Commons License Este es un artículo publicado en acceso abierto bajo una licencia Creative Commons