SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.8 número especial 19Cambios esperados al uso del suelo en México, según escenario de cambio climático A1F1Calidad poscosecha en mango ‘Kent’ con fertilización normal y alta índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Revista mexicana de ciencias agrícolas

versión impresa ISSN 2007-0934

Rev. Mex. Cienc. Agríc vol.8 spe 19 Texcoco nov./dic. 2017

https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v0i19.668 

Articles

Sporicidal activity of the electrolyzed solutionwith neutral pH in fungi of postharvest importance

Rafael Gómez Jaimes1  § 

Tania Villarreal Barajas2 

Alfonso Vázquez López3 

Ramón Ignacio Arteaga Garibay4 

Jorge Alberto Osuna García1 

1Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias. Carretera Internacional México-Nogales km 6, Entrada a Santiago Ixcuintla, Nayarit, México. (gomez.rafael@inifap.gob.mx; osuna.jorgealberto@inifap.gob.mx).

2Esteripharma México, SA de CV. Patricio Sanz 1582, Col. del Valle, Ciudad de México, México. CP. 03100. (tvillarreal@esteripharma.com.mx).

3Hornos núm. 1003, Col. Noche Buena, Santa Cruz Xoxocotlán, Oaxaca. CP. 71230. (avasquez@ipn.mx).

4Boulevard de la Biodiversidad núm. 2498, Col. Centro, Tepatitlán de Morelos, Jalisco. CP. 47600. (arteaga.ramon@inifap.gob.mx).


Abstract

The electroless water with neutral pH (7) is a novel antimicrobial agent, which has an effect on a large variety of microorganisms, safe for humans and the environment. The efficiency of electrolyzed super oxidation water with neutral pH (SES) in the reduction of spore germination and development of the germinative tube in fungi of postharvest importance was determined. A suspension of 8 × 107 mL-1spores of the fungiBotrytis cinereaisolated from blackberry,Colletotrichum gloeosporioidesisolated from mango, guava and lychee,Fusarium solaniisolated from chili and stevia,Monilinia fructicolaisolated from peach,Penicillium digitatumisolated from Mexican lemon and Persian lemon,Penicilliumsp., papaya isolate andRhizopus stoloniferisolated from yaca and soursop, were in contact with the SES for 5 min at concentrations of 3, 5, 6, 8, 18, 24, 27, 29, 36 and 43 ppm free chlorine, and sterile distilled water (control). Spores were seeded in culture medium potato dextrose agar(Bioxon®); the evaluations were carried out at 24 and 48 hours after sowing. The 100% inhibition of spore germination andBotrytisgerm length was observed in the concentration range of 18-43 ppm,Colletotrichum(6-43 ppm),Fusarium(6-43 ppm),Monilinia(8 and 24-43 ppm),Penicillium(18-43 ppm),Rhizopusisolated from soursop (5-24 and 29-43 ppm) andRhizopusof yaca (18-43 ppm). The results suggest that SES could be used as an alternative control of post-harvest fungi.

Keywords: fruit; pathogen; rot; spores

Resumen

El agua electrolizada con pH neutro (7) es un novedoso agente antimicrobiano, que tiene efecto en una gran variedad de microorganismos, seguro para los seres humanos y el medio ambiente. Se determinó la eficacia del agua electrolizada de súper oxidación con pH neutro (SES) en la reducción de la germinación de esporas y desarrollo del tubo germinativo en hongos de importancia postcosecha. Una suspensión de 8 × 107 esporas mL-1 de los hongos Botrytis cinerea aislado de zarzamora, Colletotrichum gloeosporioides aislado de mango, guayaba y lichi, Fusarium solani aislado de chile y estevia, Monilinia fructicola aislado de durazno, Penicillium digitatum aislado de limón mexicano y limón persa, Penicillium sp., aislado de papaya y Rhizopus stolonifer aislado de yaca y guanábana, estuvieron en contacto con la SES por 5 min a concentraciones de 3, 5, 6, 8, 18, 24, 27, 29, 36 y 43 ppm de cloro libre, y agua destilada estéril (testigo). Las esporas se sembraron en medio de cultivo papa dextrosa agar (Bioxon®); las evaluaciones se realizaron a las 24 y 48 horas posteriores a la siembra. La inhibición de 100% en la germinación de esporas y longitud del tubo germinativo de Botrytis se observó en el rango de concentración de 18-43 ppm, Colletotrichum (6-43 ppm), Fusarium(6-43ppm), Monilinia (8 y 24-43 ppm), Penicillium (18-43 ppm), Rhizopus aislado de guanábana (5-24 y 29-43 ppm) y Rhizopus de yaca (18-43 ppm). Los resultados sugieren que la SES podría ser utilizada como alternativa de control de hongos poscosecha.

Palabras clave: enfermedad; esporas; fruto; pudrición; patógeno

Introduction

Post-harvest pathogens of fungal origin are considered the main cause of post-harvest losses in fresh fruits and vegetables (Nunes, 2012; Spadaro and Droby, 2016). FAO (2011) mentioned that the percentage of losses of fruits and vegetables during post-harvest handling, storage and packaging 34% in South and Southwest Asia, 30% in Latin America, Central Asia and North Africa, 10% in industrialized countries of Asia, 7% in Europe and 6% in North America and Oceania. In the present study, the most important species of fungi were found in the genusPenicillium,Botrytis,Monilinia,Rhizopus,Alternaria,Aspergillus,Fusarium,Mucor,GloeosporiumandColletotichumrepresent the pathogens responsible for the most important postharvest disease (Deanet al., 2012; Liuet al., 2013).

Although the use of chemical fungicides for the management of post-harvest diseases of fruits and vegetables remains the most commonly used control method, the health effects of fungicide residues and the environment, as well as the development of resistant biotypes of associated pathogens to their continued use, have led to the establishment of strict regulatory standards and strong consumer demands to minimize the use of chemicals in their food supplies (Drobyet al., 2009; Abano and Sam-Amoah, 2012; Spadaro and Droby, 2016).

Due to the above, in the last years alternative methods have been explored for the management of postharvest diseases of low environmental impactand inhuman health (Sharmaetal., 2009; Liuet al., 2013; Rahulet al., 2015). The food industry has employed numerous techniques for the elimination of pathogens in each of the food production chains. However, some of these techniques have disadvantages due to their high cost, permanence of chemical residues, low efficacy or adverse effects on the quality of food products (Abadiaset al., 2008; Rahmanet al., 2016). Other pathogen control alternatives have now been generated, such as electrolyzed water, which is produced with normal water, without the addition of any chemicalsexcept sodium chloride (Rahmanet al., 2016).

Electrolyzed water is generated by the electrolysis of a dilute NaCl solution that passes through an anode in an electrolysis membrane (Kimet al., 2000; Huanget al., 2008). The electrolyzed water has a high oxidation potential and the presence of hypochlorous acid, these properties cause it to exhibit antimicrobial activity against different types of viruses, bacteria and fungi (Bucket al., 2002; Huanget al., 2008). In the case of fungi, electrolyzed water has shown effectiveness onAspergillus flavusandAspergillus parasticus,Penicillium digitatum,P. expansum,Botrytis cinerea,Monilinia fructicola,Helminthosporiumsp., andPhytophthora parasitica(Bucket al., 2002; Muelleret al., 2003; Whangchaiet al., 2010; Houet al., 2012; Zhanget al., 2012; Dinget al., 2015; Rahmanet al., 2016; Wanget al., 2016).

In recent years acid electrolyzed water (pH 2-4) and neutral electrolyzed water (pH 6-8) have been studied for their high effectiveness against pathogens affecting fruits and vegetables. Acid electrolyzed water has a strong antimicrobial effect due to its low pH (2-4), high potential oxidation reduction and its oxidizing actives such as hypochlorous acid. However, it has some disadvantages, is potentially corrosive to the equipment used in the processes and irritant to the hands, and presents a short shelf life due to the loss of chlorine, since at this low pH, the Cl2 dissolved in gas can rapidly be lost as a result of volatilization, and may adversely affect human health and the environment (Abadiaset al., 2008; Guentzelet al., 2008; Rahmanet al., 2010; Wanget al., 2016).

On the other hand, neutral electrolyzed water, also known as slightly acidic electrolyzed water, is a solution with pH between 6-8, in which the main biocidal agents are HOCI, CIO-, HO2 and O2. Due to its neutral pH it is more stable, since the loss of chlorine is significantly reduced; in addition, it contributes to the non-corrosion of metallic surfaces and minimizes potential damages to human health and the environment (Landa-Soliset al., 2005; Dezaet al., 2005; Luo and Oh, 2015; Wanget al., 2016). Based on the above, electrolyzed water is a potential alternative for the control of phytopathogenic fungi of agricultural importance, without generating resistant organisms, damage to the environment and human health. The objective of this study was to determine the biological effectiveness of electrolyzed solution of super oxidation with neutral pH (SES) atdifferent concentrations in different sorts of post-harvest fungi of economic importance affecting fruits and vegetables.

Materials and methods

Experimental fungi

In the present study seven fungi of importance in postharvest were evaluated:Botrytis cinerea,Monilia fructicola,Penicillium digitatum,Penicilliumsp.,Colletotrichum gloeosporioides,Fusarium solaniandRhizopus stolonifer.In the Table 1 details the information for each isolate.

Table 1 Origin and culture of fungal isolates 

Hongo Cultivo Órgano afectado Síntoma Estado Botrytis cinerea Zarzamora (Rubus ulmifolius) Fruto Pudrición Colima y Jalisco
Monilia fructicola Durazno (Prunus persica) Fruto Pudrición México
Penicillium digitatum Limón mexicano (Citrus aurantifolia) Fruto Pudrición Colima
Penicillium digitatum Limón persa (Citrus latifolia) Fruto Pudrición Nayarit
Penicillium sp. Papaya (Carica papaya) Fruto Pudrición Colima
Colletotrichum gloeosporioides Mango (Mangifera indica) Fruto Antracnosis Nayarit y Sinaloa
Colletotrichum gloeosporioides Guayaba (Psidium guajava) Fruto Antracnosis Aguascalientes
Colletotrichum gloeosporioides Lichi (Litchi chinensis) Fruto Antracnosis Nayarit
Fusarium solani Estevia (Stevia rebaudiana) Raíz y tallo Pudrición Nayarit
Fusarium solani Chile (Capsicum annuum) Raíz y tallo Pudrición Aguascalientes
Rhizopus stolonifer Guanábana (Annona muricata) Fruto Pudrición Nayarit
Rhizopus stolonifer Yaca (Artocarpus heterophyllus) Fruto Pudrición Nayarit

Testing biological effectiveness of the SES on spore germination and germ tube development

An inoculation increment was made for the selected strains in PDA culture medium. The fungi were incubated at 27 °C for 7-10 days in a BINDER-BD® incubator. From each of the genera, a conidial solution of 1 × 105spores mL-1in sterile distilled water was prepared. An electrolyzed super oxidation solution with neutral pH (SES) was used, which was provided by Esteripharma, SA. of CV. The value of pH (pH 7.03 ±0.02), concentration of active chlorine (54 ±1 mg-1 L) and potential oxidation-reduction was observed after the electrolysis and until the end of the experiment. (862 ±3.9 mV) were completely stable.

Dilutions were made with the SES and the conidial solution in sterile distilled water at concentrations of 3, 5, 6, 8, 18, 24, 27, 29, 36 and 43 mg L-1of active chlorine. The spores remained 5 min at each concentration. From each dilution (treatment) eight samples (replicates) of 100 μLwere taken and placed at four equidistant points on a Petri dish with PDA culture medium; the beads were covered with a coverslip, then the boxes were capped and incubated at 27 °C. For each treatment, an absolute control was included. In the absolute control, the spores were immersed in sterile distilled water replacing the SES.

Percent inhibition of spore germination was determined. The estimation was performed by counting 100 spores at eight randomly selected points, one spot per coverslip, in the clear field at 10x of a Leica® model DM1000 optical microscope. The number of spores germinated on the PDA culture medium was recorded at 24 and 48 h after sowing.

Also, photographs were taken of the spores, and the software Leica LAS® length germ tube (µm) spores 24 and 48 h was measured. A completely randomized design with eight replicates per treatment was used for the statistical analysis, where the experimental unit was the spore concentration covered with the coverslip. An analysis of variance (Anova) was performed and comparison of means (Tukeyp≤ 0.05) using SAS (SAS Institute, Inc., 2010).

Results and discussion

Effectiveness of SES on Botrytis cinerea

InBotrytisisolated blackberry in the state of Colima, SES had effect in reducing spore germination at all concentrations at 24 h at concentration intervals of 2-43 ppm active chlorine germination was reduced by 100%. At 48 h 100% reduction was observed at 4 and 18-43 ppm (Table 2). The development of the germ tube was inhibited at 24 h at concentrations of 2 to 43 ppm, while at 48 h the total inhibition was reached from 4 to 43 ppm (Table 3). For the case ofBotrytisisolated from blackberry in Jalisco, similar results were observed, where concentrations of 2 to 43 ppm were not statistically different at 24 h and 100% reduction in germination was presented at concentrations of 3, 4 and 18-43 ppm at 48 h, 100% reduction was observed at 1, 3, 4, and 18-43 ppm (Table 2).

Table 2 Percent inhibition of B. cinerea spores germination in blackberry fruits. 

Concentraciones SES (ppm) Zarzamora
Colima Jalisco
24 h 48 h 24 h 48 h
Testigo 0 b 0 d 0 c 0 c
3 100 a 81.18 ab 100 a 100 a
5 100 a 85.21 ab 95.32 ab 96.42 ab
6 100 a 33.85 cd 87.04 ab 81.02 ab
8 100 a 65.73 abc 94.33 ab 79.54 ab
18 100 a 100 a 100 a 100 a
24 100 a 100 a 100 a 100 a
27 100 a 100 a 100 a 100 a
29 100 a 100 a 100 a 100 a
36 100 a 100 a 100 a 100 a
43 100 a 100 a 100 a 100 a

Letras iguales dentro de la misma columna no son estadísticamente diferentes (Tukey, p≤ 0.05).

Table 3 Length of the germinative tube (μm) of B. cinereal in blackberry fruits. 

Concentraciones SES (ppm) Zarzamora
Colima Jalisco
24 h 48 h 24 h 48 h
Testigo 274.78X a 584.65 a 343.62 a 264.02 b
3 0 c 65.85 b 0 c 0 d
5 0 c 0 b 264.27 b 72.72 cd
6 0 c 0 b 41.46 c 375.02 a
18 0 c 0 b 0 c 0 d
24 0 c 0 b 0 c 0 d
27 0 c 0 b 0 c 0 d
29 0 c 0 b 0 c 0 d
36 0 c 0 b 0 c 0 d
43 0 c 0 b 0 c 0 d

Xμm= micras; letras iguales dentro de la misma columna no son estadísticamente diferentes (Tukey, p≤ 0.05).

In the length of the germ tube, at 24 h the inhibition was reached at 3, 4 and 18-43 ppm, while at 48 h it was present at concentrations of 1, 3, 4 and 18-43 ppm (Table 3). Several studies have reported that electrolyzed water has asporicidal effect onBotrytis(Huanget al., 2008; Craveroet al., 2016 and Felizianiet al., 2016). Guentzelet al. (2010 and 2011) reported that electrolyzed water close to neutrality (pH= 6.3- 6.5) inhibitedB. cinereaisolated from grape and strawberry at concentrations of 25 to 100 ppm of active chlorine.

Effectiveness of SES onColletotrichum gloeosporioides

InColletotrichummango isolated in Nayarit, SES inhibited 100% germination of spores at 24 h in concentrations of 3, 6-24 and 29-43 ppm, whereas in 48 h, all concentrations showed total inhibition of spores (Table 4). The SES inhibited germ tube development at all concentrations at 24 h. At 48 h, concentrations of 2-43 ppm inhibited 100% growth, except at 27 ppm, where the length was 6 μ (Table 5).

Table 4 Percentage inhibition of C. gloeosporioides spores germination in mango, guava and lychee fruits. 

Concentraciones SES (ppm) Mango Guayaba Lichi Mango
Nayarit Aguascalientes Nayarit Sinaloa
24 h 48 h 24 h 48 h 24 h 48 h 24 h 48 h
Testigo 0 b 21.86 b 0 b 0 b 9.88 c 5.41 b 5.65 b 8.51 b
3 100 a 100 a 100 a 100 a 100 a 100 a 96.67 a 98.33 a
5 72.22 a 100 a 100 a 100 a 100 a 100 a 90.85 a 100 a
6 100 a 100 a 100 a 100 a 100 a 100 a 100 a 100 a
8 100 a 100 a 100 a 100 a 100 a 100 a 100 a 100 a
18 100 a 100 a 100 a 100 a 100 a 100 a 100 a 100 a
24 100 a 100 a 100 a 100 a 85.75 b 100 a 100 a 100 a
27 99.35 a 100 a 100 a 100 a 100 a 100 a 100 a 100 a
29 100 a 100 a 100 a 100 a 100 a 100 a 100 a 100 a
43 100 a 100 a 100 a 100 a 100 a 100 a 100 a 100 a

Letras iguales dentro de la misma columna no son estadísticamente diferentes (Tukey,p≤0.05).

Table 5 Length of the germ tube (µm) ofC. gloeosporioides inmango, guava and lychee fruits. 

Concentraciones SES (ppm) Mango Guayaba Lichi Mango
Nayarit Aguascalientes Nayarit Sinaloa
24 h 48 h 24 h 48 h 24 h 48 h 24 h 48 h
Testigo 190.86X a 443.69 a 229.34 b 394.85 a 638.87 a 724.12 a 122.09 a 174.2 a
3 0 b 0 c 0 b 0 b 0 c 0 b 5.13 c 10.6 b
5 0 b 0 c 0 b 0 b 0 c 0 b 71.56 b 0 b
6 0 b 0 c 0 b 0 b 0 c 0 b 0 c 0 b
8 0 b 0 c 0 b 0 b 0 c 0 b 0 c 0 b
18 0 b 0 c 0 b 0 b 0 c 0 b 0 c 0 b
24 0 b 0 c 0 b 0 b 80.59 b 0 b 0 c 0 b
27 0 b 6.38 c 0 b 0 b 0 c 0 b 0 c 0 b
29 0 b 0 c 0 b 0 b 0 c 0 b 0 c 0 b
36 0 b 0 c 0 b 0 b 0 c 0 b 0 c 0 b
43 0 b 0 c 0 b 0 b 0 c 0 b 0 c 0 b

Xµm= micras; letras iguales dentro de la misma columna no son estadísticamente diferentes (Tukey,p≤0.05).

ForColletotrichumin mango fruits from Sinaloa, inhibition in germination was 100% at concentration intervals of 6-43 ppm at 24 h, and from 5-43 ppm at 48 h (Table 4). Similar effects were observed in the length of the germ tube (Table 5). InColletotrichumguava fruits, SES inhibited 100% spore germination and germination development at all concentrations at 24 and 48 h (Table 4 and 5). For the case ofColletotrichumin lychee fruits, at 24 h concentrations of 3 to 18 ppm and 27 to 43 ppm inhibited 100% germination, while at 48 h, all concentrations with SES inhibited 100% germination of spores (Table 4). In the length of the germ tube, at 24 h their development was inhibited at concentration intervals of 3-18 ppm and 27-43 ppm. At 48 h, all concentrations with SES inhibited the development of the germ tube (Table 5).

Based on the results obtained, it can be determined that SES has a control effect onColletotrichumspores, which causes anthracnose in mango, lychee and guava, at concentrations equal to or greater than 6 ppm. Huanget al. (2008) and Hatiet al. (2012) mentioned that electrolyzed water has shown sporicidal effect onColletotrichum. In a strawberry study (Fragaria × ananassa), Hirayamaet al. (2016), reported that neutral electrolyzed water (pH= 6.5-7.5) completely eliminated the conidia ofC. fruticolaat 10 ppm. According to Bucket al.(2002),Colletotrichumis a fungus that has a thin wall, which makes it susceptible to damage with electrolyzed water. This is because it induces cell disruption, which causes alterations in cellular processes and consequently cell death (Hatiet al., 2012).

Effectiveness of SES onFusarium solani

The results onFusariumisolated from chile showed that SES at concentrations of 3 to 43 ppm reduced spore germination by 100% at 24 h; at 48 h only the concentration at 5 ppm reduced germination 81.45%, the rest of the concentrations reduced it by 100% (Table 6). In the germ tube length concentrations of 3 to 43 ppm completely inhibited the development of the tube at 24 h, and at 48 hatconcentrations of 3 to 4 and from 6 to 43 ppm there was no tube growth (Table 7). On the other hand,Fusariumisolated from stevia presented results similar toFusariumisolated from chili, both in the percentage of inhibition of spore germination and in the length of the germinative tube (Table 6 and 7). Bucket al. (2002) reported that electrolyzed water reduces spore germination inFusarium.

Similar results were reported in F.oxysporumf.sp.lycopersiciwith acid electrolyzed water (Abbasi and Lazarovits, 2006). For its part Audenaertet al. (2012) determined that the electrolyzed neutral water had a sporicidal effect onF. graminearum. The data obtained in this research suggest that the SES has sporicidal effect and in the development of theFusariumgerminative tube at concentrations up to 3 ppm.

Table 6 Percentage inhibition of spore germination of F. solani in chile and stevia. 

Concentraciones SES (ppm) Chile Estevia
Aguascalientes Nayarit
24 h 48 h 24 h 48 h
Testigo 0 b 0 c 0 c 0 b
3 100 a 100 a 100 a 100 a
5 100 a 81.45 b 11.57 b 3.12 b
6 100 a 100 a 100 a 100 a
8 100 a 100 a 100 a 100 a
18 100 a 100 a 100 a 100 a
24 100 a 100 a 100 a 100 a
27 100 a 100 a 100 a 100 a
29 100 a 100 a 100 a 100 a
36 100 a 100 a 100 a 100 a
43 100 a 100 a 100 a 100 a

Letras iguales dentro de la misma columna no son estadísticamente diferentes (Tukey, p≤ 0.05).

Table 7 Length of the germinative tube (μm) of F. solani in chile and stevia. 

Concentraciones SES (ppm) Chile Estevia
Aguascalientes Nayarit
24 h 48 h 24 h 48 h
Testigo 173.73X a 565.28 a 389.19 b 577.98 b
3 0 b 0 b 0 c 0 c
5 0 b 58.2 b 465.27 a 661.80 a
6 0 b 0 b 0 c 0 c
8 0 b 0 b 0 c 0 c
18 0 b 0 b 0 c 0 c
24 0 b 0 b 0 c 0 c
27 0 b 0 b 0 c 0 c
29 0 b 0 b 0 c 0 c
36 0 b 0 b 0 c 0 c
43 0 b 0 b 0 c 0 c

Xμm=micras; letras iguales dentro de la misma columna no son estadísticamente diferentes (Tukey, p≤ 0.05).

Effectiveness of SES onMonilinia fructicola

In the percentage reduction in spore germination all SES concentrations were not statistically different (p≤ 0.05) in the two evaluations (24 and 48 h); in the first evaluation the percentage of reduction was 77 to 100%, where the concentrationsof6to43 ppm inhibitedthegermination 100%, for the last evaluation the reduction percentage was between 66 and 100%, and the concentrations that totally inhibited germination were 3, 8, and 24 to 43 ppm (Table 8). For the germ tube length, concentrations of 6 to 43 ppm inhibited the development of the tube at 24 h, whereas at 48 h the inhibition was present at 3, 8 and from 24 to 43 ppm (Table 9 ).

Table 8 Percentage inhibition of M. fructicola spores germination in peach fruits. 

Concentraciones SES (ppm) Durazno
Estado de México
24 h 48 h
Testigo 0 bX 6.4 b
3 78.33 a 100 a
5 77.78 a 94.82 a
6 100 a 95.97 a
8 100 a 100 a
18 100 a 93.33 a
24 100 a 100 a
27 100 a 100 a
29 100 a 100 a
36 100 a 100 a
43 100 a 100 a

Letras iguales dentro de la misma columna no son estadísticamente diferentes (Tukey, p≤ 0.05).

Table 9 Length of the germinative tube (μm) of M. fructicola in peach fruits. 

Concentraciones SES (ppm) Durazno
Estado de México
24 h 48 h
Testigo 255.99X a 372.69 a
3 33.61 b 0 d
5 29.66 b 34.59 cd
6 0 b 50.11 cd
8 0 b 0 d
18 0 b 35.18 cd
24 0 b 0 d
27 0 b 0 d
29 0 b 0 d
36 0 b 0 d
43 0 b 0 d

Xμm= micras; letras iguales dentro de la misma columna no son estadísticamente diferentes (Tukey, p≤ 0.05).

In general, it can be inferred that concentrations of SES equal to or greater than 24 ppm significantly affect the germination and development of theMoniliniagerm tube. Similar results were reported byAl-Haqet al. (2001); Huanget al. (2008); Hatiet al. (2012); Rahmanet al. (2016): Felizianiet al. (2016), who mentioned that electrolyzed water has control effects onMonilinia. For its part Guentzelet al. (2010) reported that electrolyzed water near neutrality (pH= 6.3-6.5) inhibitedM. fructicolaat concentrations of 25 to 100 ppm of active chlorine.

Effectiveness of SES onPenicillium digitatumand Penicilliumsp .

ForPenicilliumcase isolated from Persian lemon from Nayarit, SES concentrations of 18 to 43 ppm reduced germination of 100% spores at 24 and 48 h (Table 10). On the other hand, total inhibition of the germ tube at 24 and 48 h was observed in the concentration range of 18 to 43 ppm (Table 11). For the case ofPenicilliumisolated from Mexican lemon from Colima, the 100% reduction at 24 h was obtained at concentrations of 4 to 43 ppm, while at 48 h it was from 8 to 43 ppm (Table 10).

Table 10 Percentage inhibition of spore germination of P. digitatum in fruits of Persian lemon and Mexican lemon, and Penicillium sp., in papaya fruits. 

Concentraciones SES (ppm) Limón persa Limón mexicano Papaya
Nayarit Colima Colima
24 h 48 h 24 h 48 h 24 h 48 h
Testigo 5.61 c 0 c 0 b 0 d 0 b 0 b
3 32.14 b 8.55 c 96.02 a 57.44 c 100 a 69.29 a
5 50.24 b 39.1 b 100 a 89.05 a 100 a 100 a
6 99.47 a 36.12 b 100 a 97.03 a 100 a 93.75 a
8 93. 84 a 84.96 a 100 a 100 a 100 a 100 a
18 100 a 100 a 100 a 100 a 100 a 100 a
24 100 a 100 a 100 a 100 a 100 a 100 a
27 100 a 100 a 100 a 100 a 100 a 100 a
29 100 a 100 a 100 a 100 a 100 a 100 a
36 100 a 100 a 100 a 100 a 100 a 100 a
43 100 a 100 a 100 a 100 a 100 a 100 a

Letras iguales dentro de la misma columna no son estadísticamente diferentes (Tukey, p≤ 0.05).

Table 11 Length of the germinative tube (μm) of P. digitatum in fruits of Persian lemon and Mexican lemon, and Penicillium sp., in papaya fruits. 

Concentraciones SES (ppm) Limón Limón Papaya
Nayarit Colima Colima
24 h 48 h 24 h 48 h 24 h 48 h
Testigo 449.71Xa 602.2 a 255.3 a 620.71 a 216.84 a 121.707 a
3 372.94 b 603 a 17.73 b 203.39 c 0 b 62.44 b
5 204.37 c 522.9 a 0 b 328.68 b 0 b 0 c
6 0.32 d 538.4 a 0 b 16.91 d 0 b 11.46 c
8 35.42 d 242 a 0 b 0 d 0 b 0 c
18 0 d 0 a 0 b 0 d 0 b 0 c
24 0 d 0 a 0 b 0 d 0 b 0 c
27 0 d 0 a 0 b 0 d 0 b 0 c
29 0 d 0 a 0 b 0 d 0 b 0 c
36 0 d 0 a 0 b 0 d 0 b 0 c
43 0 d 0 a 0 b 0 d 0 b 0 c

Xµm= micras; letras iguales dentro de la misma columna no son estadísticamente diferentes (Tukey,p≤0.05).

On the other hand, in the germ tube length, total inhibition at 24 h was presented in the concentration range of 4 to 43 ppm, whereas at 48 h it was in the range of 8 to 43 ppm (Table 11). InPenicilliumisolated from papaya, similar effects were also observed; in the reduction of spore germination, at 24 h the concentration range of 3 to 43 ppm reduced germination by 100% and at 48 h at concentrations of 5 and 8-43 ppm (Table 10). The length of the germ tube was inhibited at the same concentrations as in spore germination (Table 11). Whangchaiet al. (2009) reported that acid electrolyzed water (pH= 4.84) at a concentration of 215 ppm of active chlorine completely inhibited the development ofP. digitatumspores in mandarin (Citrusxtangerina) after two minutes of immersion.

One year later Whangchaiet al.(2010) reported that acid electrolyzed water (pH = 3.9) at 102 ppm of active chlorine had the same effect on the same fungus from one minute of immersion. In contrast to the above, the results obtained in this research suggest that concentrations with SES higher than 8 ppm have sporicidal effects onPenicillium.

Effectiveness of SES onRhizopus stolonifer

The total reduction ofRhizopusspore germination in soursop was presented at concentration intervals of 5-24 and 29-43 ppm at 24 h, while at 48 h concentrations of 5,

6, 18, 24, 29 and 43 ppm also inhibited 100% (Table 12). On the other hand, in the length of the germinative tube the concentration intervals 5-24 and 29-43 ppm totally inhibited their development in 24 and 48 h, the rest of the concentrations had similar or greater growth to the control (Table 13).

Table 12 Percentage of inhibition in germination of R. stolonifer spores in soursop and yaca fruits. 

Concentraciones SES (ppm) Nayarit
Guanábana Yaca
24 h 48 h 24 h 48 h
Testigo 5.19 c 13.5 d 2.01 d 3.07 c
3 7.81 c 3.21 d 69.63 bc 72.65 b
5 100 a 100 a 0 d 0.00 c
6 100 a 100 a 69.63 bc 73.14 b
8 100 a 77.77 b 87.23 ab 98.66 a
18 100 a 100 a 100 a 100 a
24 100 a 100 a 100 a 100 a
27 43.92 b 48.82 c 100 a 100 a
29 100 a 100 a 100 a 100 a
36 100 a 96.63 ab 100 a 100 a
43 100 a 100 a 100 a 100 a

Letras iguales dentro de la misma columna no son estadísticamente diferentes (Tukey, p≤ 0.05).

Table 13 Length of germinating tube (μm) of R. stolonifera in soursop and yaca fruits. 

Concentraciones SES (ppm) Nayarit
Guanábana Yaca
24 h 48 h 24 h 48 h
Testigo 380.26X b 299.58 c 421.06 a 502.86 a
3 969.9 a 820.75 a 226.58 cd 292.85 b
5 0 c 0 d 334.45 ab 465.5 a
6 0 c 0 d 288.47 bc 460.99 a
8 0 c 6.81 d 176.9 d 26.43 c
18 0 c 0 d 0 e 0 c
24 0 c 0 d 0 e 0 c
27 146.84 b 491.58 b 0 e 0 c
29 0 c 0.0 d 0 e 0 c
36 0 c 4.66 d 0 e 0 c
43 0 c 0 d 0 e 0 c

Xμm=micras; letras iguales dentro de la misma columna no son estadísticamente diferentes (Tukey, p≤ 0.05).

For the case ofRhizopusisolated from yaca, concentrations with SES of 18 to 43 ppm were observed to reduce spore germination by 100% in 24 and 48 h; On the other hand, it is important to note that the concentration of 8 ppm was not statistically different from the above concentrations, and that the reduction in spore germination was slightly lower in 24 and 48 h (Table 12). In the length of the germ tube the concentrations of 18 to 43 ppm completely inhibited the development of the tube in both evaluations, 24 and 48 h. However, it should be noted that the concentration of 8 ppm was not statistically different in the concentration range of 18 to 43 ppm at 48 h (Table 13).

Although the genusRhizopusand specificallyR. stoloniferis one of the most important post-harvest fungi (Spadaro and Droby, 2006), there is little information on the effects of electrolyzed water onRhizopusspores; however, the results indicate that concentrations equal to or greater than 18 ppm of SES have significant effects on the germination and development ofRhizopusspores.

Conclusions

The electrolyte solution of super oxidation with neutral pH showed sporicidal effectiveness and inhibited the germinative tube in different genera of economically important fungi (Colletotrichum,Botrytis,Monilinia,Penicillium,FusariumandRhizopu), in the majority of the evaluated concentrations. The results obtained in this study suggest that the electrolyzed solution of super oxidation with neutral pH could be used as an alternative control to the conventional measures to control post-harvest fungi. However, to validate the use of the SES for the control of post-harvest fungi, it will be necessary to carry out biological effectiveness studies on infected fruits and inoculated with the fungi genera mentioned above.

Literatura citada

Abadias, M.; Usall, J.; Oliveira, M.;Alegre, I. and Viñas, I. 2008. Efficacy of neutral electrolyzed water (NEW) for reducing microbial contamination on minimally processed vegetables. Inter. J. Food Microbiol. 123(1-2):151-158. [ Links ]

Abano, E. E. and Sam-Amoah, L. K. 2012. Application of antagonistic microorganisms for the control of postharvest decays in fruits and vegetables. Inter. J. Adv. Biol. Res. 2(1):1-8. [ Links ]

Abbasi, P. A. and Lazarovits, G. 2006. Effect of acidic electrolyzed wáter on the viability of bacterial and fungal plant pathogens and on bacterial spot disease of tomato. Can. J. Microbiol. 52(10):915-923. [ Links ]

Al-Haq, M. I.; Seo, Y.; Oshita, S. and Kawagoe, Y. 2001. Fungicidal effectiveness of electrolyzed oxidizing water on post harvest brown rot of peach. Hortic. Sci. 36(7):1310-1314. [ Links ]

Audenaert K.; Monbaliu, S.; Deschuyffeleer, N.; Maene, P.; Vekeman, F.; Haesaert, G.; Saeger, S. D. and Eeckhout, M. 2012. Neutralized electrolyzed water efficiently reducesFusariumspp. In vitro and on wheat kernels but can trigger deoxynivalenol (DON) biosynthesis. Food Control. 23(2):515-521. [ Links ]

Buck, J. W.; van Iersel, M. W.; Oetting, R. D. and Hung, Y. C. 2002.In vitrofungicidal activity of acidicelectrolyzed oxidizing water. Plant Dis. 86(3):278-281. [ Links ]

Cravero, F.; Englezos,V.; Torchio, F.; Giacosa, S.; Segade, S. R.; Rantsiou, V. G. K.; Rolle, L. and Cocolin, L. 2016. Post-harvest control of wine-grape mycobiota using electrolyzed water. Inn. Food Sci. Emer. Technol. 35: 21-28. [ Links ]

Dean, R.; Van Kan, J. A. L.; Pretorius, Z. A.; Hammond-Kosack, K. E. and Di Pietro, A. 2012. The Top 10 fungal pathogens in molecular plant pathology. Mol. Plant Pathol. 13(4): 414-430. [ Links ]

Deza, M. A.; Araujo, M. and Garrido, M. J. 2005. Inactivation ofEscherichia coli,Listeria monocytogenes,Pseudomonas aeruginosaandStaphylococcus aureuson stainless steel and glass surfaces by neutral electrolysed water. Letters App. Microbiol. 40(5):341-346. [ Links ]

Ding, T.; Ge, Z.; Shi, J.; Xu,Y-T.; Jones, C. L. and Liu, D-H. 2015. Impact of slightly acidic electrolyzed water (SAEW) and ultrasound on microbial loads and quality of fresh fruits. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 60(2):1195-1199. [ Links ]

Droby, S.; Wisniewski, M.; Macarisin, D. and Wilson, C. 2009. Twenty years of postharvest biocontrol research: is it time for a new paradigm? Postharvest Biol. Technol. 52(2):137-145. [ Links ]

FAO. 2011. Global food losses and food waste: extent, causes and prevention. FAO, Rome.http://www.fao.org/docrep/014/mb060e/mb060e.pdf. [ Links ]

Feliziani, E.; Lichterb, A.; Smilanickc, J. L. and Ippolito, A. 2016. Disinfecting agents for controlling fruit and vegetable diseases after harvest. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 122: 53-69. [ Links ]

Guentzel, J. L.; Lam, K. L.; Callan, M.A.; Emmons, S.A. and Dunham, V. L. 2008. Reduction of bacteria on spinach, lettuce, and surfaces in food service areas using neutral electrolyzed oxidizing water. Food Microbiol. 25(1):36-41. [ Links ]

Guentzel, J. L.; Lam, K. L.; Callan, M. A.; Emmons, S. A. and Dunham, V. L. 2010. Postharvest management of gray mold and brown rot on surfaces of peaches and grapes using electrolyzed oxidizing water. Inter. J. Food Microbiol. 143(1-2):54-60. [ Links ]

Guentzel, J. L.; Callan, M. A.; Lam, K. L.; Emmons, S. A. and Dunham, V. L. 2011. Evaluation of electrolyzed oxidizing water for phytotoxic eff cts and pre-harvest management of gray mold disease on strawberry plants. Crop Protection. 30(10):1274-1279. [ Links ]

Hati, S.; Mandal, S.; Minz, P. S.; Vij, S.; Khetra,Y.; Singh, B. P. andYadav, D. 2012. Electrolyzed Oxidized Water (EOW): non-thermal approach for decontamination of food borne microorganisms in food industry. Food Nutr. Sci. 3(6):760-768. [ Links ]

Hirayama, Y.; Asano, S.; Watanabe, K.; Sakamoto, Y.; Ozaki, M.; Okayama, K.; Ohki, S. and Tojo, M. 2016. Control ofColletotrichum fructicolaon strawberry with a foliar spray of neutral electrolyzed water through an overhead irrigation system. J. General Plant Pathol. 82(4):186-189. [ Links ]

Hou, Y. T.; Ren, J.; Liu, H. J. and Li, F. D. 2012. Efficiency of electrolyzed water (EW) on inhibition ofPhytophthora parasiticavar.nicotianaegrowth in vitro. Crop Protection. 42: 128-133. [ Links ]

Huang, Y. R.; Hung, Y. C.; Hsu, S. Y.; Huang, Y. W. and Hwang, D. F. 2008. Application of electrolyzed water in the food industry. Food Control . 19(4):329-345. [ Links ]

Kim, C.; Hung, Y. C. and Brackett, R. E. 2000. Efficacy of electrolyzed oxidizing (EO) and chemically modified water on different types of foodborne pathogens. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 61(2-3):199-207. [ Links ]

Landa-Solís, C.; González-Espinosa, D.; Guzmán-Soriano, B.; Snyder, M.; Reyes-Terán, G.; Torres, K. and Gutierrez, A. A. 2015. Microcyn: a novel super-oxidized water with neutral pH and disinfectant activity. J. Hospital Infect. 61(4):291-299. [ Links ]

Liu, J.; Sui, Y.; Wisniewski, M.; Droby, S. and Liu, Y. 2013. Review: utilization of antagonistic yeasts to manage postharvest fungal diseases of fruit. Inter. J. Food Microbiol. 167(2):153-160. [ Links ]

Luo, K. and Oh, D. H. 2015. Synergistic effect of slightly acidic electrolyzed water and ultrasound at mild heat temperature in microbial reduction and shelf-life extension of fresh-cut bell pepper. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 25(9):1502-1509. [ Links ]

Mueller, D. S.; Hung, Y.-C.; Oetting, R. D.; van Iersel, M. W. and Buck, J. W. 2003. Evaluation of electrolyzed oxidizing water for management of powdery mildew on gerbera daisy. Plant Dis. 87(8):965-969. [ Links ]

Nunes, C. A. 2012. Biological control of postharvest diseases of fruit. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 133(1):181-196. [ Links ]

Rahul, S. N.; Khilari, K.; Sagar, S.; Chaudhary, S.; Kumar, S.; Vihan, N. and Tomar,A. 2015. Challenges in postharvest management of fungal diseases in fruits and vegetables - a review. SouthAsian J. Food Technol. Environ. 1(2):126- 130. [ Links ]

Rahman, S. M .E.; Ding, T. and Oh, D. H. 2010. Effectiveness of low concentration electrolyzed water to inactivate foodborne pathogens under different environmental conditions. Int J Food Microbiol. 139(3):147-153. [ Links ]

Rahman, S. M. E.; Khan, I. and Oh, D. H. 2016. Electrolyzed water as a novel sanitizer in the food industry: current trends and future perspectives. Comprehensive Rev. Food Sci. Food Safety. 15(3):471-490. [ Links ]

SAS. 2010. Institute IncSAS/STAT 9.22 User’s Guide. Cary, NC, USA. [ Links ]

Sharma, R. R.; Singh, D. and Singh, R. 2009. Biological control of postharvest diseases of fruits and vegetables by microbial antagonists: a review. Biol. Control. 50(3):205-221. [ Links ]

Spadaro, D. and Droby, S. 2016. Development of biocontrol products for postharvest diseases of fruit: The importance of elucidating the mechanisms of action of yeast. Antagonists. Trends in Food Sci. Technol. 47:39-49. [ Links ]

Whangchai, K.; Saengnil, K.; Singkamanee, C. and Uthaibutra, J. 2010. Effect of electrolyzed oxidizing water and continuous ozone exposure on the control ofPenicillium digitatumon tangerine cv. ‘Sai Nam Pung’during storage. Crop Protection. 29(4):386-389. [ Links ]

Wang, L.; Xia, Q.; Huang, P. and Li, T. 2016. The application of slightly acidic electrolyzed water asa potential washing agenton shelf- life and quality of fresh cutvegetables(lettuceand carrot). Inter. Proc. Chem. Biol. Environ. Eng. 95: 57-61. [ Links ]

Zhang, Q.; Xiong, K.; Tatsumi, E.; Li, L. T. and Liu, H. J. 2012. Elimination of aflatoxin B1 in peanuts by acidic electrolyzed oxidizing water. Food Control . 27(1):16-20. [ Links ]

Received: September 00, 2017; Accepted: December 00, 2017

Creative Commons License Este es un artículo publicado en acceso abierto bajo una licencia Creative Commons