SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.8 número especial 18Agrobiodiversidad, género y soberanía alimentaria en Tlaxiaco, Oaxaca índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Revista mexicana de ciencias agrícolas

versão impressa ISSN 2007-0934

Rev. Mex. Cienc. Agríc vol.8 spe 18 Texcoco Ago./Set. 2017

https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v8i18.211 

Articles

Diversity and abundance of epiphytic bromeliads in “El Punto” Santa Catarina Ixtepeji, Oaxaca

Sabina Carvente-Acteopan1 

Ma. Antonia Pérez-Olvera1  § 

María Flores-Cruz1  2 

Hermilio Navarro-Garza1 

Noé Flores-Hernández3 

1Colegio de Postgraduados-Campus Montecillo. Carretera México-Texcoco, km 36.5, Montecillo, Texcoco, Estado de México. CP. 56230. Tel. 01 (595) 9520200, ext. 1853. (scarvente@colpos.mx; flormar5@yahoo.com.mx, hermnava@colpos.mx).

2Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Unidad Iztapalapa. San Rafael Atlixco 186, Iztapalapa, Vicentina, Ciudad de México. CP. 09340. Tel. 01 (55) 58044600. (mafc@xanum.uam.mx).

3Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Unidad Lerma. Av. Hidalgo Pte. 46, Colonia La Estación Lerma, Estado de México, México. CP. 52006. Tel. 01 (728) 2827002, ext. 2100. (n.flores@correo.ler.uam.mx).


Abstract

Bromeliads are plants that grow in forests and jungles of the American continent. In Mexico the reported bromeliads surpass 363 and Oaxaca has 189 of them. The municipality of Ixtepeji and its agencies including “El Punto” in Oaxaca, take advantage of epiphytic bromeliads. Since 2008 they have a UMA, where their members collect in specific areas. In order to determine the diversity and abundance of bromeliads as ecological indicators of forest management, a targeted sampling was carried out during 2015 in four bromeliad utilization areas: La Cruz de Yovaneli, La Curva de San Miguel, Reynoso and La Petenera. 300 trees were selected in each zone of which 87 are oak (Quercus sp.), 32 pine (Pinus sp.) and one Bursera sp tree. In the forophytes, bromeliad species were quantified. Most bromeliads diversity and abundance of species was observed in Tillandsia (11 sp.) genus, with specificity location of at least two species per area. The oak was the forophyte that showed the greatest diversity and abundance of bromeliads. The Shannon diversity index was average in the Curva de San Miguel and Reynoso areas (1.5 and 1.3) and low for La Cruz de Yovaneli and La Petenera areas (0.6 and 0.4).

Keywords: abundance; diversity; phorophyte; Shannon index

Resumen

Las bromelias son plantas que crecen en bosques y selvas del continente americano. En México las bromelias reportadas sobrepasan las 363 y Oaxaca posee 189 de ellas. El municipio de Ixtepeji y sus agencias incluido “El Punto” en Oaxaca, aprovechan bromelias epifitas. Desde el año 2008 cuentan con una UMA, donde sus integrantes recolectan en zonas específicas. Con el objetivo de determinar la diversidad y abundancia de bromelias como indicadores ecológicos del manejo del bosque, se realizó, durante 2015, un muestreo dirigido en las cuatro zonas de aprovechamiento de bromelias: La Cruz de Yovaneli, La Curva de San Miguel, Reynoso y La Petenera. En cada zona se seleccionaron 30 árboles de los cuales 87 son de encino (Quercus sp.), 32 de pino (Pinus sp.) y un árbol de Bursera sp. En los forófitos se cuantificaron las especies de bromelias. La mayor diversidad y abundancia de bromelias se observó en especies del género Tillandsia (11 sp.), con especificidad de localización de al menos dos especies por zona. El forofito que presentó mayor diversidad y abundancia de bromelias fue el encino. El índice de diversidad de Shannon fue medio en las zonas de la Curva de San Miguel y Reynoso (1.5 y 1.3) y bajo para las zonas de La Cruz de Yovaneli y La Petenera (0.6 y 0.4).

Palabras clave: abundancia; diversidad; forofito; índice de Shannon

Introduction

The flora of Mexico is one of the most varied and complex of the planet. Various estimates have been made of floristic richness ranging from 22 000 (Rzedowski, 1991) to 31 000 species (Toledo, 1993). As a result of this complexity the plants have adapted to different environmental conditions, which has led them to develop strategies in their way of life, one of them is epiphytic.

Epiphytes are plants that grow on other plants, roots serve to anchor its host tree or phorophyte (Granados et al., 2003) therefore they do not penetrate the phorophyte’s vascular tissues to extract water and nutrients; they feed on particles floating in the air and from the material deposited in the trunks and branches on which they live (Benzing, 2008). They are located mainly in tropical and humid temperate forests, which places them as a community indicating the ecological quality and the conservation state of the forests. They are very sensitive to weather conditions and often show slow growth, which makes them even more vulnerable than other plants (Hietz, 1999; Barthlott et al., 2001; Zhu et al., 2004).

Epiphytes are of paramount importance for the functioning of certain ecosystems, because, when stratifying vertically from trees trunks up to the tops of the canopy they offer a variety of niches and resources such as water and food. The characteristics mentioned contribute to interactions with insects, bats, frogs and snakes (Stuntz et al., 2002). Also they occupy an important place in the cycle of nutrients (Toledo, 2014). These plants are adapted to an environment with adverse conditions such as lack of water, high light intensities and phorophyte or host instability (Granados et al., 2003; Mondragon et al., 2011).

This group of epiphytic plants includes non-vascular, inferior vascular and angiosperm (Toledo, 2014). Mondragon et al. (2011) indicate that the families that constitute the main vascular epiphyte component are: Orchidaceae, Piperaceae, Araceae and Bromeliaceae.

Bromeliads are epiphytes herbs, terrestrial or saxicolous, acaulescent or caulescent, with simple leaves, rosetted or acicular, distich is rare, they have a short or absent escaped with terminal or lateral inflorescences, erect or pendulous (Diego et al., 2013). In Mexico the number of species of bromeliads exceed 363 in 18 genera, of which 70% are endemic (Mondragon et al., 2011). The State of Oaxaca has 189, of which 123 species belong to the Tillandsia genus and 11 to Catopsis; therefore, it represents a significant portion of the floristic richness of Mexico (Flores and Granados, 2011).

Bromeliads are considered a non-timber forest resources (RFNM) of economic importance to rural communities (Miranda et al ., 2007). In the community of “El Punto” Santa Catarina Ixtepeji, Oaxaca, located in the Sierra Norte of Oaxaca, which is considered an area of great floristic diversity and a high degree of endemism (Mondragon et al., 2006) villagers gather the bromeliads of the trees in december since immemorial time and since 2008 by means of two Management Units for the Conservation of the Wildlife (UMA) “Catopsis” EX-00011-OAX and “Bromelias” INT-105-OAX) the first allows collecting Tillandsia carlos-hankii and Catopsis berteroniana species, and the second authorizes sale of plants; so they function as one, collecting only bromeliads fallen from trees throughout the year in specific areas of the forest.

Forests have variations in temperature and humidity, which at low levels are the main environmental factors limiting the diversity and abundance of epiphytes such as bromeliads (Acebey and Kromer, 2001; Zotz, 2005; Rzedowsk, 2006; San Martin et al., 2008). Another important aspect related to diversity is the identity of phorophyte. This has variations according to physical properties (shape, height, texture, foliage architecture and evergreen or deciduous condition) and its nutrient richness (Granados et al., 2003; Hietz 2005; Benzing, 2008; García and Damon, 2013). Previous studies have established that the greatest diversity of epiphytes is located in altitudinal gradients of 1 500 to 2 000 m (Benzing, 2000; Zotz, 2005).

In terms of diversity of epiphytic plants, alpha diversity has been used to measure the species richness of a particular community through the Shannon and Wiener index (García and Tarín, 2008; García and Toledo, 2015). This index is one of the most used to measure or quantify the specific biodiversity (Godínez and López, 2002; Martella, 2012).

The objective of this research was to determine the diversity and abundance of bromeliads in each UMA collection area in El Punto, through the analysis of alpha diversity, to generate an indicator for proper forest management.

Materials and methods

Study area. El Punto is a Municipal Agency that belongs to the Municipality of Santa Catarina Ixtepeji, and to the District of Ixtlán de Juárez (Figure 1). Its geographical coordinates are 96° 35’ 2” north latitude and 17° 13’ 18” west longitude at a height of 2 304 m. Its population is 501 inhabitants, of which 44% are men and 56% are women. 6% of the population speaks an indigenous language, has an average of 7 years of schooling and 2% of them did not go to the school. The economically active population is 52% (INEGI, 2010).

Figure 1 Localization and vicinity of the community of “El Punto”, Santa Catarina Ixtepeji, Oaxaca. (INEGI,2005). 

According to the classification system of Köppen modified by García (2004) the climatic group to which it belongs is: C (w) temperate subhumid most of the time. The orography is mountainous, with an irregular relief, typical of the mountainous areas of the Sierra Madre of Oaxaca. This feature favors the existence of a large number of vegetal associations, habitats and species. The main economic activities of the community are timber forest production, the use of RFNM, floriculture and ecotourism (SmartWood, 2002).

The field work was carried out in 2015 by: field trips for the identification of zones or harvesting sites. As well as, digital photographs of each zone and altitude data, geographic coordinates, relative humidity, vegetation and forófito types, were taken.

Journeys together with the members of the UMA with the purpose of making the collection and botanical determination of the bromeliads in the agroecological zones. A part of the collected material was classified as recommended by Lot and Chiang (1986) and copies were placed in the Herbario-Hortorio of the Colegio de Postgraduados: T. oaxacana, T. prodigiosa and T. macdougallii (CHAPA, 2016). Furthermore they donated three bromeliads individuals: T. oaxacana, T. plumosa and T. magnusiana, with key BROM-103, BROM-104, BROM-105 respectively to the Center for Sustainability Incalli Ixcahuicopa (Centli), Tlalmanalco, Estado de Mexico.

Considering the total collection área of 77 096 m2 a directed random sampling was carried out in La Cruz de Yovaneli, La petenera, La Curva de San Miguel and Reynoso which have an area of approximately 17 067.371 m2, 6 456.607 m2, 2 998.715 m2 and 50 573.947 m2 respectively, and a sampling area of 3 308.527 m2, 1 030.125 m2, 641.676 m2 and 6 502.605 m2 with a total sampling area of 11 482 m2. In all cases the sampling area was higher than 10%, as recommended (Quiñonez and Mendoza, 2009; Bautista, 2011). In each zone three transects of 50*2 m in length were drawn (Artigas and Díaz, 2013) for epiphyte plants. In each one, 10 trees were selected (30 in each agroecological zone). In each tree, bromeliad species were identified and quantified. In order to estimate the number of individuals of the Tillandsia usneoides species, due to its morphology and growth it was estimated by spheres of 15 cm diameter approximately, where each sphere is equivalent to one individual.

The Shannon-Wiener index was made considering the total number of individuals per species contributing to the analysis of alpha diversity, according to the following formula. Shannon-Wiener diversity index: H’= -Σpi ln pi. Where: pi= ni/N; N= Σni; ln= natural logarithm; ni= represents the importance value of class i; and can be assessed through abundance (Mostacedo and Fredericksen, 2000).

Results and discussion

Types of vegetation. Three types of vegetation were identified according to observations in the field and the Rzedowski (2006) classification in four areas of forest use (Table 1).

Table 1. Diversity and abundance of each collection area. 

Zona de
recolección
Tipo de
vegetación
Ubicación Altitud
(m)
Humedad
relativa (%)
Especies Número de
individuos
La Cruz de Bosque de 17° 11’ 24.00” N 2 451 39 Tillandsia oaxacana 331
Yovaneli pino-encino 96º 35’ 1.44” W Tillandsia carlos-hankii 450
La Petenera Bosque de 17° 12’ 45.81” N 2 439 54 Tillandsia prodigiosa 383
pino-encino 96º 35’ 21.21” W Tillandsia macdougallii 74
Reynoso Bosque de 17° 15’ 41.49” N 2 125 40 Tillandsia calothyrsus 32
pino-encino 96º 32’ 27.70” W Tillandsia bourgaei 166
Tillandsia magnusiana 2 198
Tillandsia fasciculata 48
Tillandsia usneoides 1 400
Tillandsia plumosa 2 340
Catopsis berteroniana 178
La Curva de Bosque de 17° 16’ 15.49” N 2 097 72 Tillandsia bourgaei 234
San Miguel encino 96º 32’ 18.50” W Tillandsia juncea 641
Tillandsia magnusiana 127
Tillandsia fasciculata 98
Tillandsia usneoides 323
Tillandsia plumosa 730
Catopsis berteroniana 10

Diversity and abundance of bromeliads. In total 9 763 individuals of bromeliads were counted. Table 1 shows the results of the species found in each area of use, highlighting the presence of two genera of epiphytic bromeliads, Catopsis with one species (berteroniana) and Tillansia with 11 species, the latter genre showed the greatest diversity and abundance.

At La Curva de San Miguel were counted from 7 to 123 individuals per tree with a total of 2 163 individuals

corresponding to seven bromeliads species of the Tillandsia and Catopsis genera. In Reynoso were found 17-344 individuals per tree with a total of 6 362 individuals of bromeliads, coinciding with the number of species and genera of Curva de San Miguel.

Curva de San Miguel y Reynoso, both very close geographically areas were those that showed greater diversity latter being the most abundant especially on two species: T. plumosa y T. magnusiana. Figure 2 shows that these two zones share five species, of the genus Tillandsia and one of Catopsis, the berteronian species, which is locally known as “jarrita” which is under special protection (NOM-059-SEMARNAT-2010). It was also observed that they differed only by two species of the same genus, the first zone with T. juncea and the second zone with T. calothyrsus.

Figure 2 Abundance of bromeliads in La Curva de San Miguel and Reynoso. 

Figure 3 shows the abundance of La Petenera, which was of 457 individuals Tillandsia genera, with two species, T. macdougallii and T. prodigiosa, finding from 2 to 44 individuals per tree. In Cruz de Yovaneli, 7 to 60 individuals were counted per tree, finding a total of 781 individuals of bromeliad of the Tillandsia genus with two species T. oaxacana and T. carlos-hankii; it should be noted that this last one called “mechudita” is a threatened species (NOM.059 SEMARNAT-2010). These two areas have the same type of vegetation, but do not share the same species, as they are very distant geographically from one another.

Figure 3 Abundance in La Cruz de Yovaneli and La Petenera. Forofito type 

Three types of phorophytes or host of bromeliads were observed, which were: oak (Quercus sp.), pine (Pinus sp.) and one tree of Bursera sp. The oak was the most frequent forophyte, close to 72%; followed by pine with about 26% (Table 2).

Table 2 Type and number of forophytes in each collection area. 

Tipo de forófito Zonas de recolección Total (%)
La Cruz de Yovaneli La Petenera La Curva de San Miguel Reynoso
Quercus sp. 13 17 30 27 87 72.5
Pinus sp. 16 13 0 3 32 26.66
Bursera sp. 1 0 0 0 1 0.833
Total 30 30 30 30 120 100

Diversity (estimated using the Shannon-Wiener index)

The Shannon- Wiener index shows values ranging from 0.4 to 1.5. The highest values were obtained in the oak and oak-pine forest, corresponding to La Curva de San Miguel and Reynoso with values of 1.5 and 1.3 respectively, while the agroecological zone Cruz de Yovaneli and La Petenera showed indexes of 0.6 and 0.4 respectively (Table 3).

Table 3 Shannon-Wiener diversity index in each harvesting zone. 

Característica La Cruz de Yovaneli La Petenera La Curva de San Miguel Reynoso
Taxa 2 2 7 7
Individuos 781 457 2 163 6 362
Índice Shannon 0.6 0.4 1.5 1.3

The four zones have different altitude, vegetation type, humidity and temperature. The most diverse and abundant areas of bromeliads were located in La Curva de San Miguel and Reynoso. The altitude of the study areas is 2 097 and 2 125 masl respectively. In this regard, Benzing (2000); Zotz (2005) mention that the greatest diversity of epiphyticis located at an altitude of 1 500 to 2 000 m above sea level, which coincides with this study. Mondragon et al. (2006) conducted a study of bromeliad diversity in different altitudinal gradients and found that in the higher and cooler areas there was a considerable decrease in bromeliads compared to other lower and warmer areas. Therefore, the decrease in temperature may be the factor that limits the presence of epiphytic species that are susceptible to cold (Benzing, 1990; Zotz, 2005).

Another important aspect that is related to the diversity and abundance of epiphytes is the identity of the phorophyte. The oak was the phorophyte who was present in 70% of cases showing in them a very prominent diversity and abundance of bromeliads at the Reynoso and La Curva de San Miguel areas, this coincides with that reported by Rzedowski (2006) in which it is referred that the oaks are good forophytes for the epiphytes. Another study that agrees with this information is reported by Diego et al. (2013) who conducted an investigation of the bromeliads flora of the Tillandsia genus and 47% of them live in oak forests. It is noteworthy that these two areas are home to the Catopsis berteroniana and Tillandsia usneoides species the first one is under special protection (NOM-059-SEMARNAT-2010) and the second is of utmost importance not only for UMA members, but for the whole community, especially in “christmas” season (Mondragón et al., 2006).

Areas of lower abundance diversity were La Petenera and La Cruz de Yovaneli, the latter area has the T. carlos-hankii species, which is threatened (NOM-059-SEMARNAT-2010) and T. Oaxacana classified as endemic. Both in pine-oak forest, but geographically distant. The most abundant forophyte in these two areas was the pine, but apparently they are considered to be very unfavorable for the epiphytes. In this regard Benzing (1990); Rzedowski (2006) mention that this may happen because they offer an unfavorable substrate for the epiphytes, due to the production of allelopathic compounds such as resins, which they produce as a repellent for possible enemies.

Regarding to the Shannon-Wiener index, all areas showed different diversity values, La Curva de San Miguel obtained the highest with 1.5, followed by Reynoso with 1.3 clarifying that the index is sensitive to low values showed in some species, due to this the index of this last zone was slightly smaller compared to the first one, being this equally diverse, but still more abundant. In this regard, García and Toledo (2015) carried out a study of the bromeliads diversity. At 4 sites in a forest in Veracruz, with much larger sampling sizes than in this research, they found 12 species with a Shannon index value of 0.7 up to 1.3, very similar values to those reported in this research. The authors García and Tarín (2008), reported that in coffee agro-ecological zones and forest sites, the highest index was 3.08 in the forest and the lowest of 1.5 in a coffee growing site. According to the results, bromeliads diversity and abundance yield important intermediate values, in addition to the fact that there are species in some risk category, of economic importance and endemic to the state of Oaxaca.

Conclusions

The diversity and abundance found in the agroecological zones evaluated show specificity of species determined by the type of forophyte, by the height above sea level and by the climatic conditions. The T. macdougalli and T. prodigiosa species and are found only in La Petenera agroecological area, T. oaxacana and T. carlos- hankii are only found in Cruz de Yovaneli area; T. juncea is specific for the Curva de San Miguel while T. calothyrsus and Catopsis verteroniana are only found in Reynoso, although the latter two zones share five species of Tillandsia genera (T. bourgaei, T. plumosa, T. fasciculata, T. magnusiana and T. usneoides) although in the area of Reynoso the abundance found (6 362 individuals) is much greater.

The vertical abundance with higher values were Reynoso and Curva de San Miguel with 17-344 and 7-123 individuals per tree for Reynoso and Curva de San Miguel, respectively, while in Curva de Yovanelli and Petenera values of 7-60 and 2-44 individuals per tree were found.

The Shannon indices indicate that the diversity in the agroecological zones of Reynoso and La Curva de San Miguel was average and for the areas of La Cruz de Yovaneli and Petenera is low.

Abundance and diversity data can be used as indicators for differentiated use of bromelias by areas and species, without endangering natural populations and allowing the regeneration of their populations.

Literatura citada

Acebey, A. y Kromer, T. 2001. Diversidad y distribución vertical de epífitas en los alrededores del campanario río Eslabón y de la laguna Chalalán, Parque Nacional Madidi, Departamento, La Paz, Bolivia. Revista de la Sociedad Boliviana de Botánica. 3(1-2):104-123. [ Links ]

Albertos, B.; Garilleti, R.; Lara, F. y Mazimpaka, V. 2001. Especificidad de los briófitos epífitos frente al forófito en un robledal mixto gallego. Boletín de la Sociedad Española de Briología. 18-19:25-36. [ Links ]

Artigas, C. y Díaz, F. 2013. Muestreo en transecto de formaciones vegetales de fanerófitos y caméfitos: fundamentos metodológicos. Ver. Est. Geog. 84(274):67-88. [ Links ]

Barthlott, W.; Schmith. J. and Engwald, S. 2001. Diversity and abundance of vascular epiphytes: a comparision of a secondary vegetation and primary montane rainforest in the Venezuelan Andes. Netherlands. Plant Ecol. 152 (2):145-156. [ Links ]

Bautista, F. 2011. Técnicas de muestreo para manejadores de recursos naturales. 2da. Edición. Centro de Investigación en Geografía Ambiental -Instituto de Geografía. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. México, D. F. 790 pp. [ Links ]

Benzing, D. H. 2008. Vascular epiphytes: general biology and related biota. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 354 p. [ Links ]

Benzing, D. H. 2000. Bromeliaceae: profile of an adaptative radiation.Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 346 p. [ Links ]

Diego- Escobar, M.; Flores-Cruz, M. y Koch, S. 2013. Bromelias: flora de Guerrero, Tillandsia sp. L. (Bromeliaceae). Las prensas de sociales. Primera edición. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM). México, D. F. 122 p. [ Links ]

Flores, M. y Granados, C. 2011. Listado de bromelias. In: diversidad florística de Oaxaca: de musgos a angiospermas. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM). 310-351 pp. [ Links ]

García, E. 2004. Modificaciones al sistema de clasificación climática de Köppen. Serie Libros No. 6. 5ta. (Ed.). Instituto de geografía de la UNAM. México. 98 p. [ Links ]

García, J. y Tarín, A. 2008. Epífitas vasculares: bromelias y orquídeas. In: Manson, R.; Hernández O. V.; Gallina, S. y Mheltreter, K. (Ed.). Agroecosistemas cafetaleros de Veracruz biodiversidad, manejo y conservación. Instituto de Ecología A. C. (INECOL)-Instituto Nacional de Ecología (INE)-Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales (SEMARNAT). México. 69-82 pp. [ Links ]

García, A. y Damon, A. 2013. Abundancia, distribución en los forófitos y producción de frutos de la primera población de Telipogon helleri (Orchidaceae) descubierta en México. Ver. Mex. Bio. 84(3):894-900. [ Links ]

García, F. J. G. y Toledo, A. T. 2015. Manejo de bromelias epifitas en bosque mesófilo de montaña en el Centro de Veracruz. Instituto de Ecología A. C. Informe final SNIB-Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad (CONABIO). Proyecto Núm. HQ001. México, Distrito Federal. 78 p. [ Links ]

Granados-Sánchez, D.; López-Ríos, G. F.; Hernández-García, M. Á. and Sánchez-González, A. 2003. Ecology of epiphytes plants. Rev. Chapingo Ser. Cienc. Forest. Amb. 9(2):101-111. [ Links ]

Hietz, P. 1999. Diversity and conservation of epiphytes in a changing environment. Institut für Botanik. Austria. Recuperado de http://www.iupac.org/symposia/proceedings/phuket97/hietz.html.IUPAC. [ Links ]

Lot, A. y Chiang, F. 1986. Manual de herbario. Administración y manejo de colecciones, técnicas de recolección y preparación de ejemplares botánicos. Consejo Nacional de la Flora de México, A. C. México. 142 p. [ Links ]

Miranda-Jiménez, M.; Arellano-Mijangos, J.; Salazar- Acevedo, B.; Quero-Cruz, R. y Pérez-Santiago, L. 2007. Bases para el manejo comunitario de bromelias ornamentales. México: Grupo Autónomo para la Investigación Ambiental, A. C. http://www.era-mx.org/biblio/bromelias-ornamentales.pdf. [ Links ]

Mondragón, D.; Ramírez, I.; Flores, M. y García, J. 2011. La familia bromeliaceae en México. Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería, Desarrollo Rural, Pesca y Alimentación (SAGARPA)- Servicio Nacional de Inspección y Certificación de Semillas (SNICS). Universidad Autónoma Chapingo (UACH). 98 p. [ Links ]

Mondragón, D.; Villa, D.; Escobedo, G. y Franco, A. 2006. La riqueza de bromelias epífitas a lo largo de un gradiente altitudinal en Santa Catarina Ixtepeji, Oaxaca, México. Naturaleza y Desarrollo. 4(2):13-16. [ Links ]

Mostacedo, B. y Fredericksen, T. S. 2000. Manual de métodos básicos de muestreo y análisis en ecología vegetal. Proyecto de manejo forestal sostenible (BOLFOR). Santa Cruz, Bolivia. 87 p. [ Links ]

Muñoz, A.; Chacón, P.; Pérez, F.; Barnert, E. and Armesto, J. 2003. Diversity and host tree preferences of vascular epiphytes and vines in a temperate rainforest in southern Chile. Austr. J. Bot. 51: 381-391. [ Links ]

Quiñonez, M. M. y Mendoza, G. 2009. Manual de prácticas ecología de comunidades. Departamento de ciencias químico-biológicas. Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez (UACJ). Chihuahua, México. 137 p. [ Links ]

Rzedowski, J. 1991. Diversidad y orígenes de la flora fanerogámica de México. Acta Bot. Mex. 14:3-21. [ Links ]

Rzedowski, J. 2006. Vegetación de México. Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad (CONABIO). 1ra. Edición digital. México, D. F. 505 p. [ Links ]

San Martín, J.; Espinosa, A.; Zanetti, S.; Hauenstein, E.; Ojeda, N. y Arriagada, C. 2008. Composición y estructura de la vegetación epífita vascular en un bosque primario de Olivillo (Aextoxicom punctatum) en el sur de Chile. Ver. Ecología Austral. 18:1-11. [ Links ]

Smart, W. 2002. Resumen público de certificación de comunidad de Santa Catarina Ixtepeji. http://www.rainforest-alliance.org/forestry/documents/catarina.pdf. [ Links ]

Stuntz, S.; Ziegler, C.; Simon, U. and Zotz, G. 2002. Diversity and structure of the arthropod fauna within three canopy epiphyte species in central Panama. J. Trop. Ecol. 18:161-176. [ Links ]

Toledo, T. 2014. Lluvia de bromelias en el bosque de niebla. Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería, Desarrollo Rural, Pesca y Alimentación (SAGARPA)- Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad (CONABIO). Biodiversitas. 117:1-6. [ Links ]

Toledo, V. M. 1993. La riqueza florística de México: un análisis para conservacionistas. In: Guevara, S.; Moreno- Casasola, P. y Rzedowski, J. (Eds.). Logros y perspectivas del conocimiento de los recursos vegetales de México en vísperas del siglo XXI. Instituto de Ecología, A. C. Sociedad Botánica de México, Xalapa. 109-123 pp. [ Links ]

Zhu, H.; Xu, Z.; Wang, H. and Li, B. 2004. Tropical rain forest fragmentation and its ecological and species diversity changes in southern Yunnan. J. Biod. Conserv. 13:1355-1372. [ Links ]

Zotz, G. 2005. Vascular epiphytes in the temperate zones a review. Plant Ecol. 176(2):173-183. [ Links ]

Received: January 00, 2017; Accepted: April 00, 2017

Creative Commons License Este es un artículo publicado en acceso abierto bajo una licencia Creative Commons