SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.7 número6Mecanismos de financiamiento: caso productores de cebada y trigo en Valle de Santiago, GuanajuatoRelación NO 3 - /K + en la solución nutritiva en el crecimiento y rendimiento de pepino hidropónico índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Revista mexicana de ciencias agrícolas

versão impressa ISSN 2007-0934

Rev. Mex. Cienc. Agríc vol.7 no.6 Texcoco Ago./Set. 2016

 

Articles

Use of humates of vermicompost to reduce the effect of salinity on growth and development of basil (Ocimum basilicum L.)

Juan José Reyes-Pérez1  2 

Bernardo Murillo-Amador3  § 

Alejandra Nieto-Garibay3 

Enrique Troyo-Diéguez3 

Edgar Omar Rueda-Puente4 

Luis Guillermo Hernández-Montiel3 

Pablo Preciado Rangel5 

Alfredo Beltrán Morales6 

Francisco Rodríguez Félix4 

Ringo John López Bustamante1 

1Universidad Técnica de Cotopaxi. Extensión La Mana, Avenida Los Almendros y Pujili. Edificio Universitario. La Maná, Ecuador. (jjreyesp1981@gmail.com).

2Universidad Técnica Estatal de Quevedo. Av. Walter Andrade. Vía a Santo Domingo km 1 ½. Quevedo, Los Ríos, Ecuador.

3Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas del Noroeste S.C.- Instituto Politécnico Nacional, núm. 195, Colonia Playa Palo de Santa Rita Sur, La Paz, Baja California Sur, México. (anieto04@cibnor.mx; etroyo04@cibnor.mx; lhernandez@cibnor.mx).

4Universidad de Sonora. Carretera Bahía de Kino, km. 21. A. P. 305. Hermosillo, Sonora, México. (erueda04@santana.uson.mx; frodriguez@guayacan.uson.mx).

5Instituto Tecnológico de Torreón. División de Estudios de Posgrado e Investigación. Carretera Torreón-San Pedro km 7.5. Torreón, Coahuila, México. (ppreciado@yahoo.com.mx).

6Universidad Autónoma de Baja California Sur. Carretera al Sur km 5.5., A. P. 19-, B, C.P. 23080, La Paz Baja California Sur, México. (abeltran@uabcs.mx).


Abstract

Plant growth bio-stimulants are natural substances to treat crops as activators of physiological functions, so its application allows a better use of nutrients and represent an appropriate option to address problems of abiotic stress by salinity. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of humates of vermicompost as attenuating of salinity in growth and development of two varieties of basil (Ocimum basilicum L.), one tolerant and one sensitive to salinity, which underwent three NaCl concentrations (0, 50 and 100 mM) and the application of humates of vermicompost with two dilutions (0 and 1/60 v/v) in a completely randomized design with six replications. The work was developed in a greenhouse and stem and root length, fresh and dry biomass of root, stem, leaf and leaf area were measured. The results showed that Napoletano variety in 0 mM NaCl and the dissolution of 1/60 (v/v) humates of vermicompost was the best response in all variables measured, while lower values were for Sweet Genovese in 100 mM NaCl. The differential response between varieties when subjected to different levels of NaCl and application of humates of vermicompost is discussed.

Keywords: bioestimulantes; herbs; morphometric variables; NaCl; stress

Resumen

Los bioestimulantes del crecimiento vegetal son sustancias naturales para el tratamiento de los cultivos como activadores de las funciones fisiológicas, por lo que su aplicación permite un mejor aprovechamiento de los nutrientes y representan una opción adecuada para enfrentar problemas de estrés abiótico por salinidad. El objetivo del presente estudio fue determinar el efecto del humatos de vermicompost como atenuante de la salinidad en el crecimiento y desarrollo de plantas de dos variedades de albahaca (Ocimum basilicum L.), una tolerante y una sensible a la salinidad, las cuales se sometieron a tres concentraciones de NaCl (0, 50 y 100 mM) y a la aplicación de humatos de vermicompost con dos diluciones (0 y 1/60 v/v) en un diseño completamente al azar con seis repeticiones. El trabajo se desarrolló en una casa malla sombra y se midió longitud de tallo y raíz, biomasa fresca y seca de raíz, tallo, hoja y el área foliar. Los resultados mostraron que la variedad Napoletano en 0 mM de NaCl y la disolución de 1/60 (v/v) de humatos de vermicompost fue la de mejor respuesta en todas las variables medidas, mientras que los valores inferiores los presentó la variedad Sweet Genovese en 100 mM de NaCl. Se discute la respuesta diferencial entre las variedades al someterlas a diferentes niveles de NaCl y la aplicación de humatos de vermicompost.

Palabras clave: bioestimulantes; estrés; hierbas aromáticas; NaCl; variables morfométricas

Introduction

Recent studies on the effects of salinity on agricultural crops, show the importance of this problem in world agriculture. Therefore, alternatives have been sought to mitigate the effect of salinity and one of these is the use of bio-stimulants of natural origin, which have been rising to the extent that they demonstrate that they are able to minimize abiotic stresses (Munns 2002; Chinnusamy and Zhu, 2003; Terry and Leyva, 2006).

The growing interest of consumers for natural products stimulate the market of aromatic plants, making this a viable option for the agricultural sector, the possibility of exporting fresh or processed extracts, essences and oils used in culinary industries , cosmetic and pharmaceutical (Biasutti and Galiñares, 2005; Terry and Leyva 2006; Méndez, 2008). Basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) is an important aromatic species for its use in the food industry as a flavoring and seasoning; in pharmacy as a stimulant, antispasmodic and perfume industry for flavoring cosmetics and fine perfumery (Cussaianoviich, 2001; Klimánková et al., 2008; Calderín et al., 2012.). There are no reports of the effects of bio-stimulants as mitigating salinity in growth and development of basil, so the objective of this study was to determine the effect of a natural bio-stimulant (humate of vermicompost) as attenuating of salinity stress on growth and development of two Basil varieties, one tolerant and one sensitive to salinity, in order to elucidate the possible differential response of both varieties to the application of humates.

Materials and methods

Study site. The experiment was conducted in a greenhouse-like structure covered with a black plastic mesh with shadow of 40% in the Center for Biological Research of the Northwest, S.C. (CIBNOR®), located north to the city of La Paz, Baja California Sur, Mexico and located at the geographic coordinates 24° 08' 10.03 "north latitude and 110° 25' 35.31" west longitude at 7 masl.

Genetic material. Napoletano and Sweet Genovese seed varieties, selected as tolerant and sensitive to salinity in previous experiments performed in germination, emergence and early vegetative stages development according to ISTA (1999) were used.

Experimental design and treatments. The experiment was conducted using a completely randomized design with a tri-factorial arrangement 2 x 3 x 2, where the factor A were two varieties of basil, a tolerant and sensitive to salinity (Napoletano and Sweet Genovese, respectively), factor B were three concentrations of NaCl (0, 50 and 100 mM) and factor C were two humate vermicompost concentrations (0 and 1/60), with six replications. The seeds of both varieties were disinfected by dipping for 5 min in a solution of calcium hypochlorite, containing 5% active chlorine. The seeds were washed with distilled water and embedded in distilled water (control) or in humates of vermicompost dilutions (1/60 v/v) for 24 hr. analysis of variance and multiple comparisons of means (Tukey, p = 0.05) were performed. Analyses were performed using the statistical program Statistica® (StatSoft Inc2011) for Windows.

Humate composition. Humates are considered plant bio-stimulator and nutrients carrier (Ca, Mg, Na, P2O5, K, N), free amino acids, polysaccharides, carbohydrates, inorganic elements, humified substances, beneficial microorganisms, plant hormones and soluble humus, whose composition by chemical fractions correspond to a pH of 8.7, 53.4% C, 4.85% H, 35.6% O, 3.05% N, 0.72% S, a H/C ratio of 0.08, a ratio 0/C of 0.62, a C/N ratio of 18.4, 4.82 humic acids and 7.17 fulvic acids in E4/E6 ratio of its optical coefficient.

Experimental management. The seeds were sown in trays or 200 cavities polystyrene trays, which contained sogemix PMMR as substrate. To maintain moisture, daily irrigations were applied in order to achieve a homogeneous seedling emergence. The transplant was performed when plants had an average height of 15 cm in pots of about 1 kg, same containing as commercial substrate sogemix PM®. In each pot one plant was placed in order to ensure successful transplantation. Once transplanted, it began with the daily application of irrigation, using potable water, which contained a nutrient solution prepared according to Samperio (1997). After a week of transplantation, began with the application of saline treatments of 0, 50 and 100 mM NaCl and foliar application of the corresponding dilution of humates vermicompost (1/60 v/v), using distilled water as control.

Each replication was represented by a pot containing a plant each, with 36 pots per variety for a total of 72 pots. During the second week began with gradual application of saline treatment, in order to avoid an osmotic shock in seedlings, according to the methodology proposed by Murillo-Amador et al., (2007). The amount applied in each irrigation was 500 mL, achieving that solution applied drained through the pot holes in order to prevent accumulation of salts in the substrate. The pH of the solution with saline treatments and nutrients was adjusted to 6.5 by adding KOH.

Morphometric variables. At 45 days after the application of saline treatment, plants were transferred to the laboratory proceeding to separate root, stem and leaves and measured, stem length (cm), root length (cm), fresh and dry (g) biomass of root, stem, leaf and leaf area (cm2), the latter was determined by a leaf area integrator (Li-Cor®, model-LI-3000A, PAM 1701 series). An analytical balance (Mettler Toledo, model AG204) was used to determine fresh and dry weight of biomass. For dry biomass at all stages, corresponding to leaves, stems or roots were placed in paper bags and then in a drying oven (Shel-Lab®, model FX-5, series-1000203) at a temperature of 80 °C until complete dehydration (about 72 h). Then weighed on analytical balance (Mettler Toledo AG204) expressing the weight in grams of dry vegetable matter.

Results and discussion

Morphometric variables. For stem length (LT) significant differences between varieties were found (F1,36 = 1102.61; p≤ 0.000001), NaCl (F2,36 = 859.49; p≤ 0.000001), humates (F1,36= 844.90; p≤ 0.000001 ) and the interaction of NaCl × humates (F2,36 = 4.69; p≤ 0.001). For interactions varieties × NaCl, varieties × humates and varieties × NaCl × humates, showed no significant differences. When analyzing interactions, it was observed that in all three napoletano variety in the three NaCl concentrations, showed the highest stem length, which decreased in both varieties as salinity levels increased (Table 1). In both varieties, stem length increased when humate was applied, being slightly higher in napoletano both control treatment and dilution 1/60 (Table 2). Although the interaction varieties × NaCl × humates showed no significant differences, Napoletano showed the highest LT in 0 mM NaCl and humate dilution of 1/60, also in both varieties, LT increased compared to control in humate dilution 1/60 at all NaCl concentrations. The lowest LT was for the variety Sweet Genovese in 100 mM NaCl and 0 humate (Table 3).

Table 1. Effect of interaction varieties × NaCl in average of morphometric variables of two basil varieties subjected to saline stress. 

Variedades LR (cm) BFR (g) BSR (g)
mM NaCl
0 50 100 0 50 100 0 50 100
Napoletano 13a 9.62a 7.43a 9.28a 6.86a 5.34a 1.36a 0.93a 0.69a
Sweet Genovese 9.18b 7b 5b 7.55b 5.37a 3.29b 0.95b 0.62b 0.37b
LT (cm) BFT (mg) BST (mg)
mM NaCl
0 50 100 0 50 100 0 50 100
Napoletano 71.12a 60.12a 50a 35.69a 29.26a 24.73a 3.81a 2.90a 2.17a
Sweet Genovese 57.37b 46.18b 35.56b 27.16b 19.26b 14.26b 2.27b 1.43b 1.06b
BFH (g) BSH (g) AF (cm2)
mM NaCl
0 50 100 0 50 100 0 50 100
Napoletano 35.33a 29.34a 25.28a 3.69a 3.07a 2.31a 1689.91a 1420.68a 1224.92a
Sweet Genovese 27.97b 19.72b 14.53b 2.67b 1.72b 1.28b 1310.46b 1025.52b 750.63b

Table 2. Effect of interaction varieties × humates of vermicompost in average of morphometric variables of two basil varieties subjected to saline stress. 

Variedades LR (cm) BFR (g) BSR (g)
HV (v/v)
0 1/60 0 1/60 0 1/60
Napoletano 8.20a 11.83a 5.67a 8.64a 0.83a 1.16a
Sweet Genovese 6.08b 8.04b 4.50a 6.30b 0.49b 0.81b
LT (cm) BFT (mg) BST (mg)
HV (v/v)
0 1/60 0 1/60 0 1/60
Napoletano 53.95a 66.87a 27.45a 32.26a 2.54a 3.38a
Sweet Genovese 40.54b 52.20b 17.22b 23.24b 1.24b 1.94b
BFH (g) BSH (g) AF (cm 2 )
HV (v/v)
0 1/60 0 1/60 0 1/60
Napoletano 27.59a 32.37a 2.68a 3.36a 1353.13a 1537.2a
Sweet Genovese 18.12b 23.37b 1.55b 2.23b 888.28b 1169.46b

Table 3. Effect of interaction varieties × NaCl × humates of vermicompost in average of morphometric variables of two basil varieties subjected to saline stress. 

Variedades NaCl (mM) HV (v/v) LT (cm) LR (cm) BFR (g) BSR (g) BFT (g) BST (g) BFH (g) BSH (g) AF (cm 2 )
Napoletano 0 0 64.75a 10.25b 7.76b 1.2a 33.21a 3.53b 33.87a 3.48b 1607.17a
Napoletano 0 1/60 77.5a 15.75a 10.8a 1.51a 37.92a 4.09a 36.8a 3.89a 1772.64a
Napoletano 50 0 53.87a 8c 5.51d 0.73a 26.9a 2.31d 26.37a 2.78d 1309.22a
Napoletano 50 1/60 66.37a 11.25b 8.21b 1.14a 31.63a 3.48b 32.31a 3.36b 1532.13a
Napoletano 100 0 43.25a 6.37d 3.75e 0.55a 22.25a 1.78e 22.55a 1.78g 1143a
Napoletano 100 1/60 56.75a 8.50c 6.93c 0.84a 27.22a 2.57c 28.01a 2.84cd 1306.83a
Sweet Genovese 0 0 52.75a 8.25c 6.92c 0.83a 24.54a 1.93e 25.8a 2.33e 1210.68a
Sweet Genovese 0 1/60 62a 10.12b 8.17b 1.08a 29.78a 2.62c 30.14a 3.02c 1410.23a
Sweet Genovese 50 0 40.62a 6d 4.1e 0.44a 16.78a 1.06g 16.9a 1.38h 842.73a
Sweet Genovese 50 1/60 51.75a 8c 6.64c 0.81a 21.74a 1.8e 22.55a 2.05f 1208.29a
Sweet Genovese 100 0 28.25a 4e 2.49f 0.21a 10.34a 0.74h 11.65a 0.96i 611.42a
Sweet Genovese 100 1/60 42.87a 6d 4.09e 0.54a 18.19a 1.39f 17.42a 1.61gh 889.83a

Humate concentration increased plant height (Table 2) and these dilutions counteracted saline stress, ever since dilution 1/60 (v/v) mitigated the negative effect of salinity. This coincides with Fernandez-Luqueño et al., (2010) who found that bean plants treated with vermicompost, showed higher growth to one third compared to controls in plant height. A similar responses found Channabasanagowda et al. (2008) on wheat plants with application of vermicompost, noting a significant increase in height. Buniselli et al. (1990) working with corn, found an increase in weight, plant height, ear length and grain yield when applied humic acids. Shovelful et al. (1999) evaluated basil plants both in ground and in pots with various substrates, finding that it develops better under port conditions than in ground conditions and the best substrate was the organic substrate (mixture of manure and wheat straw); similar results were detected by Yao Lei et al. (2000) Nardi et al. (2002b); and Miceli et al. (2003).

Radicle length (LR) showed significant differences between varieties (F1,36 = 426.0; p≤ 0.0001), NaCl (F2,36 = 388.16; p≤ 0.0001), humates (F1,36 = 379.35; p≤ 0.0001) interactions varieties × NaCl (F2,36 = 9.02; p ≤ 0.0001), and varieties × humates (F1,36 = 33.80; p≤ 0.0001), NaCl × humates (F2,36 = 11.05; p≤ 0.0001) and varieties × NaCl × humates (F = 2.36 = 12.95; p≤ 0.001). The analysis of the main interactions revealed that Napoletano variety showed the highest LR in all NaCl concentrations, decreasing linearly in both varieties as NaCl levels increased (Table 1). Napoletano showed greater LR both control and humate dilution of 1/60 and in both varieties increased with the application of humates (Table 2).

The interaction varieties × NaCl × humates showed Napoletano with the highest LR in 0 mM NaCl and humate dilution 1/60; also, in both varieties, LR increased over control in humate dilution 1/60 dilution at all NaCl concentrations. The lowest LR was for Sweet Genovese in 100 mM NaCl and 0 humate (Table 3). The results indicate an increase in LR from the application of humates. While root development is severely affected by salt stress, humic acids from humates of vermicompost positively influenced growth. This is because humic acids promote increases in permeability of cell membrane in basil, so despite hypertensive saline conditions, favored seed imbibition, to solubilize starch, thus favoring carbohydrate availability for root growth. Other effect is due to a function as a regulator or growth promoter, inducing growth, as noted by Nardi et al., (2002a).

The results of this study are consistent with those of Barros et al., (2010) who noted that humic substances as abscisic acid and indole-acetic acid contained in vermicompost, promote plant growth. Meanwhile, Ermakov et al. (2000) found that the humic acid adsorbed to cells of the plant at surface level, increases its permeability, which promotes nutrient absorption by plants. The initial negative effect observed in seedling growth in saline environments, is counteracted by the action of humic substances applied, inducing a sudden growth later (Yldrm et al., (2003).

Fresh root biomass (BFR) showed significant differences between varieties (F1,36 = 373.65; p≤ 0.0001), NaCl (F2,36 = 682.28; p≤ 0.0001), humates (F1,36 = 689.89; p≤ 0.0001), the interaction varieties × humates (F1,36 = 42.07; p≤ 0.0001) and varieties × NaCl × humates (F = 2.36 = 7.93; p≤ 0.001). For interactions varieties × NaCl and NaCl × humates showed no significant differences. The analysis of significant interactions of factors, showed napoletano with the highest BFR at all NaCl concentrations, which decreased in both varieties as salinity levels increased (Table 1). The Neapoletano variety also showed greater BFR both in control and humate dilution 1/60, noting that both varieties increased BFR in humate dilution 1/60 (Table 2).

Although the interaction varieties × NaCl × humates showed no significant differences, Napoletano showed the highest BFR in 0 mM NaCl and humate dilution 1/60; moreover, in both varieties, BFR increased over the control in humate dilution 1/60 at all NaCl concentrations. The lowest BFR was for Sweet Genovese in 100 mM NaCl and 0 humate (Table 3). Meanwhile root dry biomass (BSR) showed significant differences between varieties (F1,36 = 408.64; p≤ 0.0001), NaCl (F2,36 = 449.59; p≤ 0.0001), humates (F1,36 = 373.83; p≤ 0.0001) and interaction NaCl × humates (F1,36 = 3.75; p≤ 0.0001). For interactions varieties × NaCl, varieties × humates and triple interaction varieties x NaCl × humates, showed no significant differences. Table 1 shows that Napoletano variety had higher BSR values, which decreased in both varieties as salinity levels increased. Also Napoletano showed the highest BSR both in control and humate dilution 1/60 and in both varieties BSR increased with humate application (Table 2).

Although the interaction varieties × NaCl ×humates showed no significant differences, Napoletano showed greater BSR at 0 mM NaCl and humate dilution 1/60; also, in both varieties BSR increased over the control in humate dilution 1/60 at all NaCl concentrations. The lowest BSR was for Sweet Genovese in 100 mM NaCl and 0 humate (Table 3). Fresh and dry root biomass is manifested by an increase of biomass with the application of humates vermicompost and exhibits a linear decrease in function of increasing levels of NaCl. These results coincide with those from Fernández-Luqueño et al. (2010) who conducted an experiment on bean plants to determine if humic substances increase biomass, finding a double increase of fresh and dry root biomass, compared to control treatment.

Moreover, Chen and Aviad (1990) consider that humic substances, improve the root formation and growth, thus dry biomass. Fresh stem biomass (BFT) showed significant differences between varieties (F1,36 = 1341.42; p≤ 0.0001), NaCl (F2,36 = 687.63; p≤ 0.0001), humates (F1,36 = 424.0; p≤ 0.0001) , interactions varieties × NaCl (F2,36 = 5.66; p≤ 0.0001), varieties × humates (F1,36 = 5.30; p≤ 0.0001), NaCl × humates (F2,36 = 3.63; p≤ 0.0001). For the triple interaction varieties × NaCl × humates showed no significant differences. Table 1 shows that Napoletano variety had the highest BFT in the three NaCl concentrations. BFT decreased in both varieties as salinity levels increased (Table 1).

Napoletano also showed greater BFT both in control and humate dilution 1/60, noting that this in both varieties this variable increased by adding humates (Table 2). Although the interaction varieties × NaCl × humates showed no significant differences, Napoletano showed greater BFT in 0 mM NaCl and humate dilution 1/60; moreover, in both varieties, BFT increased over the control in humate dilution 1/60 all NaCl concentrations. The lowest BFT was for Sweet Genovese in 100 mM NaCl and 0 humate (Table 3).

Stem dry biomass (BST) showed significant differences between varieties (F1,36 = 3214.99; p≤ 0.0001), NaCl (F2,36 = 1181.10; p≤ 0.0001), humates (F1,36 = 1000.26; p≤ 0.0001), interactions varieties × NaCl (F2,36 = 29.70; p≤ 0.0001), varieties × humates (F1,36 = 9.00; p≤ 0.0001), NaCl × humates (F2,36 = 16.71; p≤ 0.0001) and varieties × NaCl × humates (F=2,36 = 11.19; p≤ 0.0001). Table 1 shows that Napoletano variety exhibited the highest BST, which decreased in both varieties as salinity levels increased. Napoletano also showed higher BST both in control and humate of vermicompost dilution 1/60, observing that for both varieties, BST increased when applying humate (Table 2).

The interaction variety × NaCl × humates showed Napoletano with higher BST in 0 mM NaCl and humate dilution 1/60; also, in both varieties, BST increased regarding control at humate dilution 1/60 at all NaCl concentrations. The lowest BST was for Sweet Genovese in 100 mM NaCl and 0 humate (Table 3). Fresh leaf biomass (BFH) showed significant differences between varieties (F1,36 = 1672.17; p≤ 0.0001), NaCl (F2,36 = 913.80; p≤ 0.0001), humates (F1,36 = 492.24; p≤ 0.0001 ), interactions varieties × NaCl (F2,36 = 19.32; p≤ 0.0001) and NaCl × humates (F2,36 = 9.40; p≤ 0.0001). For interaction varieties × humates and varieties × NaCl × humate showed no significant differences.

Table 1 shows that Napoletano had the highest BFH, which decreased in both varieties as salinity levels increased. Napoletano also showed higher BFH both in control and humate dilution 1/60, noting that in both varieties, BFH increased by applying humates (Table 2). Napoletano showed higher BFH in 0 mM NaCl and humate dilution 1/60; moreover, in both varieties, BFH increased with respect to control at humate dilution 1/60 at all NaCle concentrations. The lowest BFH was for Sweet Genovese 100 mM NaCl and 0 humate (Table 3).

Leaf dry biomass (BSH) showed significant differences (F1,36 = 1765.63; p≤ 0.0001), NaCl (F2,36 = 883.24, p≤ 0.0001), humates (F1,36 = 633.13; p≤ 0.0001), interactions varieties × NaCl (F2,36 = 16.93; p≤ 0.0001), NaCl × humates (F2,36 = 11.60; p≤ 0.0001) and varieties × NaCl × humates (F = 2.36 = 14.58; p≤ 0.0001). Interaction varieties × humates showed no significant differences. Table 1 shows that Napoletano showed higher BSH, which decreased in both varieties as salinity levels increased. Napoletano showed higher BSH in both the control and humate vermicompost dilution of 1/60; however, it was observed that both varieties BSH increased when humate was applied (Table 2).

Interaction varieties × NaCl × humates showed Napoletano with the highest BSH in 0 mM NaCl and humate dilution 1/60 and in both varieties, BSH increased with respect to control in humate dilution 1/60 at all NaCl concentrations. The lowest BSH was for Sweet Genovese 100 mM NaCl and 0 humate (Table 3). The response of fresh and dry biomass of stem and leaf to humates vermicompost showed higher values with the application of humate, suggesting that this tends to mitigate the negative effect of saline stress, which manifest in biomass production. Degano (1999) tested two sources of salt (NaCl and NaSO4) on growth and fresh stem weight of Tessaria absinthoides, finding that as salt concentration increased, regardless of source, fresh biomass decreased, ascribing this decrease to the distance and length of internodes had this same response, giving the plant a short appearance.

This response is attributed to the osmotic effect which originates in salt solution, same that difficult the water system of the plants and the toxic effect of interfering ions in metabolic processes such as carbohydrate synthesis and transport of photosynthetic products, thus its use in the production of new tissue, in addition to a positive effect on microbiological components (Gutiérrez et al., 2008), plant hormones (Jana et al., 2010), available ions (Sallaku et al., 2009) and modification of the physico-chemical properties of soil (Azarmi et al., 2008).

Conclusions

There is a differential response between varieties for morphometric variables stem length and root, fresh and dry biomass of root, stem, leaf and leaf area in salt stress conditions and the application of humate vermicompost, highlighting the Napoletano variety as the most tolerant, exhibiting the highest values in all variables with the application of bio-stimulant. The use of humates of vermicompost stimulated morphometric variables stem length and root, fresh and dry biomass of root, stem, leaf and leaf area of basil varieties under saline conditions, allowing that the tolerant variety to improve its emergence and growth and the sensitive variety increase its tolerance to salt stress.

Literatura citada

Acevedo, I. C. y Pire, Y. R. 2004. Efecto del lombricompost como enmienda de un sustrato para el crecimiento del lechosero (Carica papaya L.). Interciencia. 29:274-279. [ Links ]

Arancon, N. O.; Edwards, C. A.; Babenko, A.; Cannon, J.; Galvis, P and Metzer, J. D. 2008. Influences of vermicomposts, produced by earthworms and microorganisms from cattle manure, food waste and paper waste, on the germination, growth and flowering of petunias in the greenhouse. Appl. Soil Ecol. 39:91-99. [ Links ]

Arancon, N. Q.; Edwards, C. A.; Bierman, P.; Metzer, J. D.; Lee, S. and Welch, C. 2002. Effects of vermicomposts on growth and marketable fruits of field-grown tomatoes, peppers and strawberries. Pedo Biol. 47:731-735. [ Links ]

Aydin, A.; Kant, C. and Turan, M. 2012. Humic acid application alleviates salinity stress of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) plants decreasing membrane leakage. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 7:1073-1086. [ Links ]

Azarmi, R.; Torabi, G. M. and Dibar, T. R. 2008. Influence of vermicomposts on soil chemical and physical properties in tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum) field. Afr. J. Agric. Biotechnol. 7:2397-2401. [ Links ]

Barros, D. L.; Pascualoto, C. L.; López, O. F.; Oliveira, A. N.; Eustáquio, P. L.; Azevedo, M.; Spaccini, R.; Piccolo, A. and Facanha, A. R. 2010. Bioactivity of chemical transformed humic matter from vermicomposts on plant root growth. J. Agric. Food Chem. 58:3681-3688. [ Links ]

Biasutti, C. A. y Galiñares, V. A. 2005. Influencia del ambiente de selección sobre la germinación de semillas de maíz (Zea mays L.) bajo estrés hídrico. Relaciones entre caracteres de plántulas con el rendimiento en campo. Agriscientia. 28:37-44. [ Links ]

Buniselli, M.; Gigliotti, G. Y. and Giusquiani, Y. P. L. 1990. Applicacione del compost da RSU in agricultura. I: effetto sulla produttivia del mais e desino dei nutrienti e dei metalli pest ani nel terreno. Agrochimica. 35:13-25. [ Links ]

Calderín, A.; Louro, R.; Portuondo, L.; Guridi, F.; Hernández, O.; Hernández, R. and Castro, R. 2012. Humic acids of vermicompost as an ecological pathway to increase resistance of rice seedlings to water stress. Afr. J. Agric. Biotechnol. 11:3125-3134. [ Links ]

Channabasanagowda, N. K.; Patil, B.; Patil, B. N. and Awaknavar, J. S. 2008. Effect of organic manure ongrowth, seed yield and quality of wheat. J. Agric. Sci. 29:366-368. [ Links ]

Chen, Y. and Aviad, T. 1990. Effects of humic substances on plant growth, contribution from seagram center for soil and water sciences. In: humic substances in soil crop sciences: selected readings. [ Links ]

Chinnusamy, V. and Zhu, J. K. 2003. Plant sal tolerance.Top. Curr. Genet. 4:241-270. [ Links ]

Cussaianoviich, P. 2001. Una aproximación a la agricultura orgánica. Agric. Orgánica. 1:23-26. [ Links ]

Degano, C. M. 1999. Respuestas morfológicas y anatómicas de Tessaria absinthioides a la salinidad. Rev. Bras. Bot. 22:357-363. [ Links ]

Ermakov, E. I.; Ktitorova, I. N. and Skobeleva, O. V. 2000. Effect of humic acid in the mechanical properties of cell walls. Rus. J. Plant Physisol. 47:518-525. [ Links ]

Fernández, L, F.; Reyes, V. V.; Martínez, S. C.; Salomon, H. G.; Yañez, M. J.; Ceballos, R. J. M. and Dendooven, L. 2010. Effect of different nitrogen source on plant characteristics and yield of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Bio. Technol. 101:396-403. [ Links ]

Guichard, S.; Bertin, N.; Cherubino, L. and Christian, G. 2001. Tomato fruit quality in relation to water an carbon fluxes. Agonomie. 21:385-392. [ Links ]

Gutiérrez. M, F. A.; Zamudio, M. B.; Abud, A, M. and Dendooven, L. 2008. Sheep manure vermicomposts supplemented with a native diazotrophic bacteria and mycorrhizas for maize cultivattion. Bio. Technol. 99:7020-7026. [ Links ]

ISTA. 1999. International Seed Testing Association. International Rules for Seed Testing. Zurich, Switzerland. 321 p. [ Links ]

Jana, V.; Barot, S.; Blowin, M.; Lavelle, P.; Laffray, D. and Repellin, A. 2010. Earthworms influence the production of above and belowground biomass and the expression of genes involved in cell proliferation and stress responses in Arabidopsis thaliana. Soil Biol. Biochem. 42:244-252. [ Links ]

Kalantari, S.; Hatani, H.; Ardalan, M. M.; Alikhani, H. A. and Shorofa, M. 2010. The effect of compost and vermicomposts of yar leaf manure on growth of corn. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 5:1317-1323. [ Links ]

Klimánková, E.; Katerína, H.; Jana, H.; Cajka, T.; Poustka, J. and Koudela, M. 2008. Aroma profiles of five basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) cultivars grown under conventional and organic conditions. Food Chem. 107:464-472. [ Links ]

Kozlowski, T. T. 1997. Responses of woody plants to flooding and salinity. Tree Physiology Monograph. 1:12-17. [ Links ]

MacCarthy, C. E.; Clapp, M. R. L. and Bloom, P. R. (Eds.). American Society of Agronomy, Inc. Soil Science Society of America, Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA. 161-182 pp. [ Links ]

Mata, G. R. and Meléndez, G. R. 2005. Growth characteristics of Mexican oregano (Lippia berlandieri) under salt stress. The Southwestern Naturalist. 50:1-6. [ Links ]

Méndez, R. 2008. Cultivos orgánicos: su control biológico en plantas medicinales y aromáticas. Segunda Edición, ECOE. Bogotá. 168 p. [ Links ]

Miceli, A.; Moncada, A.; Vetrano, F. and D’Anna, F. 2003. First result on yield and quality response of basil (Ocimum bacilicum L.) grown in floating system. Acta Hortic. 609:377-381. [ Links ]

Munns, R. 2002. Comparative physiology of salt and water stress. J. Plant Biol. 49:301-304. [ Links ]

Murillo, B.; Yamada, S.; Yamaguchi, T.; Rueda, E.; Ávila, N.; García, J. L.; López, R.; Troyo, E.; Nieto, A. 2007. Influence of calcium silicate on growth, physiological parameters and mineral nutrition in two legume species under salt stress. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 193:413-421. [ Links ]

Nardi, S.; Pizzeghello, C.; Ferrarese, L.; Trainotti, L. and Casadoro, G. 2002a. A low molecular weight humic fraction on nitrate uptake and protein synthesis in maize seedlings. Soil Biol. Biochem. 32:415-419. [ Links ]

Nardi, S.; Pizzeghello, D.; Muscolo, A. and Vianello, A. 2002b. Physiological effect of humic substances on higher plants. Soil Biol. Biochem. 34:1527-1536. [ Links ]

Palada, M. C.; Crossman, S. M. A.; Kowalski, A. and Collingwood, C. D. 1999. Evaluation of organic and synthetic mulches for basil production under drip irrigation. J. Herbs. Spices Medicinal Plants 6:4. [ Links ]

Sallaku, G.; Babaj, I.; Kaw, S. and Balliu, A. 2009. The influence of vermicomposts on plant growth characteristics of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) seedlings under saline conditions. J. Food Agric. Environ. 7:869-872. [ Links ]

Samperio, R. G. 1997. Hidroponía básica. Editorial Diana. 176 p. [ Links ]

Samson, G. and Visser, S. A.1989. Surface-active effects of humic acids on potato cell membrane properties. Soil Biol. Biochem. 21:343-347. [ Links ]

StatSoft Inc. 2011. Statistica. System reference. StatSoft, Inc., Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA. 1098 p. [ Links ]

Távora, F. J. A. F.; Ferreira, R. G. e Hernández, F. F. 2001. Crescimento y relações hídricas em plantas de goiabeira submetidas a estrés salino com NaCl. Rev. Bras. Frutic. 23:441-446. [ Links ]

Taylor M. D. and Locassio, S. J. 2004. Blossom-end rot: A calcium deficiency. J. Plant Nutr. 26:123-139. [ Links ]

Terry, E. y Leyva, A. 2006. Evaluación agrobiológica de la co-inoculación micorrizas arbusculares - rizobacterias en tomate. Agron. Costarric. 30:65-73. [ Links ]

Yao, L, T.; Takano, T. and Suzuki, S. 2000. Effects of salt stress on growth, water relation and oil content of basil leaves. J. Shanghai Agric. College. 18:77-84. [ Links ]

Yldrm, E.; Dursun, A. I.; Guvenc, Y. and Kumla, Y. A. M. 2003. The effects of different salt bioestimulant and temperature levels and seed germination of some vegetable species. Department of Horticulture. Agriculture Faculty. Ataturk University. 25240 Ersurum. Turkey. Acta Agrobotánica. 55:75-80. [ Links ]

Received: June 2016; Accepted: August 2016

Creative Commons License Este es un artículo publicado en acceso abierto bajo una licencia Creative Commons