SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.6 número especial 11Modelo de infección y desarrollo de Puccinia striiformis f. sp. hordei Eriks en Guanajuato, MéxicoInsectos plaga en cultivo asociado de Ricinus communis y Moringa oleifera en el centro de Veracruz, México índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Revista mexicana de ciencias agrícolas

versão impressa ISSN 2007-0934

Rev. Mex. Cienc. Agríc vol.6 no.spe11 Texcoco Mai./Jun. 2015

https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v0i11.804 

Investigation notes

Response of sugarcane varieties (Saccharum officinarum L.) to NPK fertilization on dry land in southern Tamaulipas, Mexico

Sergio Castro Nava1 

Alfredo J. Huerta2 

1Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas-Facultad de Ingeniería y Ciencias. Centro Universitario Adolfo López Mateos. Cd. Victoria, Tamaulipas, México. C. P. 87149. Tel: 01 834 31 817 21, ext. 2125.

2Miami University-Department of Biology. Oxford, Ohio. USA. (huertaaj@miamioh.edu).


Abstract

The aim of this study was to identify the optimal economic dose for NPK that optimizes yield in the field and juice quality of sugarcane in the area of influence of the engenho San Miguel del Naranjo in Tamaulipas, Mexico under dryland conditions. The varieties CP 72-2086 and Mex 79-431 in “soca” cycle were evaluated during the 2010-2011 in two locations under dryland. For generating the treatments, we used the San Cristobal design (41, 51, 60 and 69; K: P 103, 112, 120 and 128 N 46, 58, 70 and 82 kg ha-1), in addition of the unfertilized control. The 13 treatments were distributed in field, in accordance under a randomized complete block with four replications. The 103-41-46 dose was sufficient to meet the nutritional requirements of the two varieties with an average yield of 112.2 Mg ha-1, since higher N yields were shot down. Fertilization doses recommended by the engenho (120-60-70) is not adequate for the studied varieties and soil type, suggesting further research in the area. The fertilization did not change the °Brix of the juice of the cane, indicating that the dose 103-41-46 allows increased throughput and maintain the quality of the juice.

Keywords: Saccharum officinarum L.; fertilization; nitrogen; phosphorus; potassium; yield

Resumen

El objetivo del presente trabajo fue identificar la dosis óptima económica de NPK que optimice el rendimiento en campo y la calidad del jugo de la caña de azúcar en la zona de influencia del ingenio San Miguel del Naranjo en Tamaulipas, México bajo condiciones de secano. Se evaluaron las variedades CP 72-2086 y Mex 79-431 en ciclo soca durante la zafra 2010-2011 en dos localidades bajo secano. Para generar los tratamientos, se utilizó el diseño San Cristóbal (N: 103, 112, 120 y 128; P: 41, 51, 60 y 69; K: 46, 58, 70 y 82 kg ha-1), además del testigo sin fertilizar. Los 13 tratamientos se distribuyeron en campo bajo un arreglo de bloques completos al azar con cuatro repeticiones. La dosis 103-41-46 fue suficiente para satisfacer los requerimientos nutricionales de las dos variedades con un rendimiento promedio de 112.2 Mg ha-1, ya que a dosis mayores de N se abatieron los rendimientos. La dosis de fertilización recomendada por el ingenio (120-60-70) no es la adecuada para las variedades estudiadas y el tipo de suelo, lo que sugiere mayor investigación en la zona. Las dosis de fertilización no modificaron los °Brix del jugo de la caña, lo que indica que las dosis 103-41-46 permite incrementar el rendimiento y mantener la calidad del jugo.

Palabras clave: Saccharum officinarum L.; fertilización; fósforo; nitrógeno; potasio; rendimiento

In Tamaulipas, sugarcane is planted in an area of 62 000 ha in seven municipalities (SIAP, SAGARPA, 2014). This area is area supply three engenho: Aaron Saenz, El Mante and San Miguel del Naranjo. In the last 36 000 ha are planted with 86% under rainfed. Three municipalities of Tamaulipas, Antiguo Morelos, Nuevo Morelos and Ocampo, are zones supply this engenho, representing 53% of total plantings. The average yield in the 2012-2013 harvest was 69 Mg ha-1 to 8.6 Mg ha-1 sugar changing in recent years 42-73 Mg ha-1 (Cañeros, 2014), due to the distribution of precipitation and nutritional management since it has been widely applied at a dose 120-60-70, without considering aspects such as variety, soil type, plant cycle, crop management (fertilization) and climate (Thorburn et al., 2007).

In rainfed areas, loss of fertility for crop stalks and residue burning in the field (Lal, 2009) is a common problem resulting from the extraction of nutrients from sugarcane. This results in a reduction in the profitability of the crop, which are practices necessary to maintain soil fertility and efficient use of chemical fertilizers (Lal, 2009). This poses a growing threat to production in the sugarcane areas.

For optimum plant growth, the nutrients must be adequate and balanced amounts in accordance with the time of crop demand. Sugarcane is one of the high consumption of fertilizers and crops respond well to the application (Gopalasundaram et al., 2012). The use of chemical fertilizers is an important practice for sugarcane to reach high yields; however, currently, the need to conserve the environment but especially its high cost (Franco et al., 2011) implies an appropriate and effective use to ensure maximum utilization (Salgado et al., 2003). Timely and efficient application of fertilizers will enable the early establishment of a large population of crushing stems, component of utmost importance in defining the yield. Therefore, this study aimed to identify the optimal dose of NPK economy that optimizes yield in the field and juice quality of sugarcane in the area of influence of engenho San Miguel del Naranjo was raised under conditions rainfed.

The experiment was established in sugarcane area Ocampo, Tamaulipas, supply area engenho San Miguel del Naranjo, located in the Naranjo, SLP. varieties MEX CP 72-2086 and 79-431 were evaluated cycles soca 2010 - 2011 in sugarcane plots established in two locations: Ejído La Muralla and Ejído Las Flores respectively; both locations under rainfed.

The local climate is subtropical with an average temperature during the experiment at 25 °C and rainfall of 1685 mm. Before and after the establishment of the experiment the recommended tasks were performed in the area after the cut: destroncone, ripping, two crops and weed control.

In order to generate the fertilization treatments we used as the basis the recommended dose by the engenho 120-60-70 and through the design by San Cristóbal (Martínez, 1986) the following levels of exploration were generated; N: 103, 112, 120 and 128; P: 41, 51, 60 and 69 and K: 46, 58, 70 and 82 kg ha-1, respectively. The combination of these factors led to 12 treatments according to the recommendations of the design used, in addition to the control treatment. The 13 treatments were distributed in accordance field under a randomized complete block with four replications. The fertilizer was applied in two parts; the first on February 13, 2010, 50% of N and total P and K; the second on July 18, 2010, the rest of N.

The fertilizer was applied at one side of the band in a trench groove 10 cm deep and then capped. The size of the experimental plots were four rows 1.3 m wide by 10 m long and useful plot two central rows. The harvest was performed manually when the cane was between 12 and 13 months of age in CP 72-2086 and Mex 79-431 respectively. The study variables were: stem diameter (mm) and length of internodes (cm); at harvest height stems were measured, the quality based on determinations of °Brix with a digital refractometer (Model 300051, Thomas Scientific) and field yield (Mg ha-1), for which the stems of the useful plot were weighed on a clock balance of 100 kg capacity and were converted to Mg ha-1.

In all variables an analysis of variance was applied (SAS, 2010), the mean separation test of Tukey (p= 0.05) was used to establish statistical differences. For the economic analysis proposed by CIMMYT (1988) method was used. Fertilizer costs ($kg-1 of nourishment:N= $21.95; P= $ 19.5; K= $14.83) were considered, cost of labour ($3 010 00 ha), manual cutting cost ($136.07); moving costs ($65.00 t) and the price per ton of cane ($776.99) for the year 2011.

The Figure 1 shows that in the period of the experiment, after the application of treatments, precipitation was 1 685 mm, mainly in the months of July to September 2010, which met the crop water requirements; this period coincides with the maturation stage of the crop. Temperatures during the growing period were averaged 32 and 17 °C as máximum and minimum respectively, which are favourable for growing (Moore and Botha, 2014). With these conditions of temperature and soil moisture, the plant generally showed good growth and normal development.

Figure 1 Precipitation and maximum and mínimum temperatures during the development of the cultivation of sugarcane. 2010-2011. 

The Table 1 shows the results of analysis of variance of the different variables under study are presented. The fertilization treatments had a significant effect (p˂ 0.05) in the studied variables, except for °Brix. The varieties responded to NPK fertilization treatments but not in yield. The coefficients of variation (CV) were less than 11%.

Table 1 Effect of combined application of N, P and K in two varieties of sugarcane in different variables of the plant, juice quality and low yield in rainfed in southern Tamaulipas. 

*, **, *** significativo a p≤ 0.05, 0.01 y 0.001 respectivamente; ns= no significativo a p˃ 0.05

These results confirm the need for fertilizers as an option to increase the yield of sugarcane, as indicated by Palma-López et al. (2000); Salgado et al. (2001) and Gopalasundaram et al. (2012). The response to treatment x variety interaction indicates that fertilization depends on the variety.

Plant height is quite important in the production of sugarcane and the selection of new varieties. The plant height, expressed as the length of crushing stems (LTM) is presented in Table 2, which shows that the T6 (N1P1K3) had the highest and treatment T1 (N0P0K0) had the mínimum length of crushing stems; this response represented an increase of 25%. The increase in the length of crushing stems (4-25%) resulting from the application of treatments (NPK) was also a result of increased stem diameter (9-11%) and internode length (9-23%) depending on this treatment and variety.

Table 2 Effect of combined application of NPK treatments in sugarcane under rainfed yield and other variables in southern Tamaulipas. 

En columnas, letras iguales indican no diferencias entre tratamientos (Tukey, 0.05).

This confirms that, the optimal dose of NPK will depend on soil type and variety (Palma-López et al., 2001; Salgado-García et al., 2011). However, this suggests the need to continue this research in sugarcane area of southern Tamaulipas. The length of crushing stems was increased to 19% by increases in N application from level 0 (N0P0K0) to level 1 (N1PnKn) significantly (p<0.05) but higher increases in N were not significantly different (p> 0.05) at level 1.

Similar responses to increases in N rates were reported by Muchovej and Newman (2004); Madhuri et al . (2011); Saleem et al. (2012) and McCray et al. (2014). For the effect of P, level 1 (NnP2Kn) showed a significantly higher length on crushing stems (p< 0.05) than the level 0 (N0P0K0) and similar to level 2 (NnP2Kn). The application of K at different levels increased significantly (p< 0.05) on crushing length stems, but within levels no significant differences, so it is assumed that the best level of K was level 1 (NnPnK 1) with an increase of 16% over the level 0 (N0P0K0).

The different fertilization treatments did not significantly modify the quality of cane juice sugar (°Brix) at the time of harvest. The answer in the quality of cane juice was also observed by Salgado-García et al. (2000); although, Xu et al. (2010) found that high doses of N, P and K itself had a significant increase in the quality of the juice. Data in Table 2 shows that, the lowest cane yield (66.1 Mg ha-1) was in treatment N0P0K0 (control) which is quite similar to the average of engenho San Miguel del Naranjo in the harvest 2012 -2013 of 69 Mg ha-1 (Cañeros, 2014). Different levels of N, P and K had a varied effect on yield of sugarcane.

The highest yield was observed in treatment N1P1K1 with 112.2 Mg. ha-1 differing significantly from other treatments and cane improves yield by 41% compared to treatment N0P0K0 and differs from treatment recommended by engenho San Miguel del Naranjo (7%) (N3P3K3). This means that, the recommended dose was not adequate for the production of sugarcane, so it is necessary to continue research in this area of Tamaulipas and define the optimal dose and economical soil type and for each variety. Similar situations in response to fertilization have been observed in other studies (Salgado et al., 2003).

Both varieties of sugarcane showed a statistically similar yield (p˃ 0.05) in its response to N fertilization (Table 3). Significant yield increases with increasing doses of N were observed up to 103 kg ha-1 (104.2 Mg ha-1), while at higher doses yield tends to decrease. Fertilization treatment dose 103-41-46 had the highest yield of sugarcane outperforming the control treatment in 70% and treatment 120-60-70 recommended by engenho San Miguel del Naranjo 7%. The best fertility treatment met the requirements of both varieties because at very high doses, the response of plants was reduced. However, Muchovej and Newman (2004) indicated that exceeding 170 kg ha-1 per dose did not increase in biomass and yield of sucrose. Moreover, the effect of phosphorus had a significant response at a dose of 69 kg ha-1 (107.5 Mg ha-1); although, similar to the dose of 41 kg ha-1 (101.4 Mg ha-1) indicating the possibility of considering an acceptable level 1 phosphorus. The variety Mex 79-431 was higher (p˂ 0.05) CP 72-2086 in stem diameter and °Brix but with similar yield (p˃ 0.05).

Table 3 Effect of combined application of NPK on two sugarcane varieties under rainfed yield and other variables in southern Tamaulipas. 

Medias de variedades con la misma letra son iguales (Tukey 0.05).

Both varieties showed a similar behaviour in response to fertilization K. At a dose of 46 kg ha-1 the maximum yield was obtained (102 Mg ha-1) and at higher doses was observed field yield was similar to this dose or a tendency to decrease. The economic analysis indicated that fertilization treatments 103-41-46 for the dose that produced the best yield, with a rate of return to variable capital of $ 1.85 and $ 3.01 for varieties CP 72-2086 and Mex 79-431 respectively, in both cases being higher return rate.

Conclusions

The varieties of sugarcane responded significantly to the application of different doses of fertilizer. The 103-41-46 dose produced the highest yield, surpassing the control if fertilization (70%) and treatment 120-60-70 recommended in the region (7%), and also the optimum economic dose, which allowed increasing yield without diminishing the quality of sugarcane juice (°Brix).

Literatura citada

Cañeros. 2014. Unión Nacional de Cañeros, A. C. CNPR: http://www.caneros.org.mx. [ Links ]

CIMMYT (Centro Internacional de Mejoramiento de Maíz y Trigo). 1988. La formulación de recomendaciones a partir de datos agronómicos: un manual metodológico de valuación económica. El Batán, Estado de México, D. F. 79 p. [ Links ]

Franco, J. E. C. and Otto, R. 2011. Nitrogen in sugarcane derived from fertilizer under Brazilian field conditions. Field Crops Res. 121(1):29-41. [ Links ]

Gopalasundaram, P.; Bhaskaran, A. and Rakkiyappan, P. 2012. Integrated nutrient management in sugarcane. Sugar Tech. 14(1):3-20. [ Links ]

Lal, R. 2009. Soil quality impacts of residue removal for bioetanol production. Soil Tillage Research. 102:233-241. [ Links ]

Madhuri, K.V. N.; Kumar, M. H. and Sarala, N. V. 2011. Influence of higher doses of nitrogen on yield and quality of early maturing sugarcane varieties. Sugar Tech. 13(1):96-98. [ Links ]

Martínez, G. A. 1988. Diseños experimentales; Métodos y elementos de teoría. Primera edición. Ed. Trillas. México, D. F. 756 p. [ Links ]

McCray, J. M.; Morgan, K. T.; Baucum, L. and Ji, S. 2014. Sugarcane yield response to nitrogen on sand soils. Agron. J. 106:1461-1469. [ Links ]

Moore, P. H. and Botha, F. C. 2014. Sugarcane: Physiology, Biochemistry and Functional Biology. First Edition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Ames, Iowa, USA. 35-54 pp. [ Links ]

Muchovej, R. M. and Newman, P. R. 2004. Nitrogen fertilization on a sandy soil: I. Yield and leaf mineral composition. J. Am. Soc. Sugar Cane Technol. 24:210-224. [ Links ]

Palma-López, D. J.; Salgado, G. S.; Obrador, O. J. J.; Trujillo, N. A.; Lagunes, E. L. C.; Zavala, C. J.; Ruiz, B. A. y Carrera, M. M. A. 2000. Sistema integrado para recomendar dosis de fertilización en caña de azúcar (SIRDF). Terra. 20:347-358. [ Links ]

Saleem, M. F.; Ghaffar, A.; Anjum, S. A.; Cheema, M. A. and Bilal, M. F. 2012. Effect of nitrogen on growth and yield of sugarcane. J. Am. Soc. Sugar Cane Technol . 32:75-93. [ Links ]

Salgado, G. S.; Núñez, E. R.; Peña, C. J. J.; Etchevers, B. J. D.; Palma, L. D. J. y Soto, R. M. 2001. Eficiencia de recuperación del nitrógeno fertilizante en soca de caña de azúcar sometida a diferentes manejos de fertilización. Terra . 19:155-162. [ Links ]

Salgado-García, S.; Núñez-Escobar, R.; Peña-Cabriales, J. J.; Etchevers-Barra, J. D.; Palma -López, D. J. y Soto- Hernández, R. M. 2000. Respuesta de la caña de azúcar a la fertilización NPK. Agrociencia. 34:689-698. [ Links ]

Salgado-García, S.; Palma-López, D. J.; Zavala -Cruz, J.; Lagunes-Espinoza, L. C.; Castelán-Estrada, M.; Ortíz-García, C. F.; Juárez-López, J.F.; Ruiz-Rosado, O.; Armida -Alcudia, L.; Rincón-Ramírez, J. A. y Córdoba-Sánchez, S. 2011. Un programa de fertilización sustentable para el ingenio “Presidente Benito Juárez” en Tabasco, México. Avances en Investigación Agropecuaria. 15(3):45-65. [ Links ]

Salgado, S.; Núñez, M.; Peña, J. J.; Etchevers, J. D.; Palma, D. J. y Soto, R. M. 2003. Manejo de la fertilización en el rendimiento, calidad del jugo y actividad de invertasas en caña de azúcar. Interciencia. 28(10):576-580. [ Links ]

SAS Institute (2010) SAS/STAT User´s guide: Version 9.2 SAS Institute, Inc. Cary, North Carolina, U.S.A. 1689 p. [ Links ]

SIAP (Servicio de Información Agroalimentaria y Pesquera), SAGARPA. 2014. http://www.siap.sagarpa.gob.mx. [ Links ]

Thorburn, P. A.; Webster, A. J.; Biggs, I. M.; Biggs, J. S.; Staunton, S. P. and Park, S. E. 2007. Systems to balance production and environmental goals of nitrogen fertilizer management. Proc. Int. Soc. Sugar Cane Technol. 26:302-309. [ Links ]

Xu, L.; Huang, H. R.; Yang, L. T. and Li, Y. R. 2010. Combined application of NPK on yield quality of sugarcane applied through SSDI. Sugar Tech. 12(2):104-107. [ Links ]

Received: February 01, 2015; Accepted: April 01, 2015

Creative Commons License Este es un artículo publicado en acceso abierto bajo una licencia Creative Commons