Razonamiento espacial para determinar el dominio de un conjunto de etiquetas que representan objetos geográficos

 

Spatial Reasoning for Determining the Domain of the Set of Tags that Represent Geographic Objects

 

Eduardo Loza-Pacheco*, Miguel Torres-Ruiz** y Giovanni Guzmán-Lugo***

 

Los autores trabajan en el Centro de Investigación en Computación del Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Av. Juan de Dios Bátiz, s/n, UPALM-Zacatenco, 07738, México D.F., México (email: *eduardo.loza@gmail.com, **mtorres@cic.ipn.mx, ***jguzmanl@cic.ipn.mx).

 

Manuscrito recibido el 9 de marzo de 2012.
manuscrito aceptado el 7 de mayo de 2012.

 

Resumen

Actualmente, existe una gran cantidad de información geográfica, proveniente de diversas fuentes como imágenes de satélite, fotografías aéreas, mapas, bases de datos, entre otras. Estas fuentes proporcionan una descripción exhaustiva de los objetos geográficos. Sin embargo, la tarea de identificar el dominio geográfico al que pertenecen involucra un procesamiento semántico, el cual está basado en la conceptualización de un dominio, lo que permite interpretarlo de una manera similar a como los seres humanos reconocen a las entidades geográficas y evitar así la vaguedad. Este trabajo propone un método para realizar un proceso de razonamiento espacial cualitativo en representaciones geográficas. El método se basa en el conocimiento a priori del dominio, el cual se encuentra explícitamente formalizado a través de una ontología. El conocimiento descrito en la ontología se valora de acuerdo con un conjunto de etiquetas que pertenecen a algún tipo de dominio geográfico para realizar el análisis semántico correspondiente y mapear esas etiquetas con los conceptos definidos en la ontología. Como resultado, se obtiene un conjunto de dominios geográficos ordenados por su relevancia, para proporcionar un concepto general relacionado directamente con las etiquetas de entrada, simulando la forma en que cognitivamente percibimos algún dominio geográfico en el mundo real.

Palabras Clave: Inteligencia artificial y computacional, sistemas inteligentes, adquisición de conocimiento, representación de conocimiento.

 

Abstract

Nowadays, there is much geospatial information from different sources such as satellite images, aerial photographs, maps, databases, and so on. It provides a comprehensive description of geographic objects. However, the task to identify the geographic domain to which it belongs is not simple, because this task involves semantic processing based on a conceptualization of a domain. It allows us to understand information in a way similar to how humans recognize the geographic entities and avoid vagueness. We propose a method for qualitative spatial reasoning in geospatial representations.

The method is based on a priori knowledge, which is explicitly formalized through an ontology. The knowledge described in the ontology is assessed according to a set of tags that belong to any geographical domain for semantic analysis, to map those tags to concepts defined in the ontology. As a result, a set of geographic domains in order of relevance is obtained, for providing a general concept directly related to the input tags, simulating the way in which humans cognitively perceive a geographic domain in the real world.

Key words: Computational and Artificial Intelligence, Intelligent Systems, Knowledge Acquisition, Knowledge Representation.

 

DESCARGAR ARTÍCULO EN FORMATO PDF

 

AGRADECIMIENTOS

Este trabajo ha sido auspiciado y apoyado por el Instituto Politécnico Nacional (IPN), el Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACYT) y la Secretaría de Investigación y Posgrado del IPN, a través de los proyectos: 20113712, 20113757, 20120563 y 20120482.

 

REREFENCIAS

[1] G. A. Elmes et al., "GIS and Society: Interrelation, Integration, and Transformation," A Research Agenda for Geographic Information Science, vol. 3, CRC, pp. 287, 2005.         [ Links ]

[2] J. Hobbs, J. Blythe, H. Chalupsky, and T.A. Russ, A Survey of Geospatial Resources, Representation and Reasoning. Public Distribution of the University of Southern California, 2006.         [ Links ]

[3] M. Donnelly, T. Bittner, and C. Rosse, "A formal theory for spatial representation and reasoning in biomedical ontologies," Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, vol. 36, Elsevier, pp. 1-27, 2006.         [ Links ]

[4] D. Hernandez, and A. Mukerjee, "Representation of spatial knowledge," Information Systems Magazine, 1995.         [ Links ]

[5] J. Renz, Qualitative spatial reasoning with topological information. New York: Springer-Verlag, ch. 1, 2002.         [ Links ]

[6] D. M. Mark, "Geographic Information Science: Defining the field," Foundations of Geographic Information Science, New York: Taylor and Francis, pp. 3-18, 2003.         [ Links ]

[7] M. Egenhofer, and D. M. Mark, "Naive Geography," Spatial Information Theory a Theoretical Basis for GIS, New York: Springer-Verlag, 1995, pp. 1-15.         [ Links ]

[8] J. Sharma, Integrated spatial reasoning in geographic information systems: combining topology and direction, University of Maine, 1996.         [ Links ]

[9] B. Smith, "Mereotopology: a theory of parts and boundaries," Data & Knowledge Engineering, vol. 20, no. 3, Elsevier, pp. 287-303, 1996.         [ Links ]

[10] L. Jiming and L. K. Daneshemend. Spatial reasoning and planning: geometry, mechanism, and motion, New York: Springer-Verlag, ch. 1, 2004.         [ Links ]

[11] B. Bennett, "Physical objects, identity and vagueness," Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning International Conference, Morgan Kaufmann, pp. 395-408, 2002.         [ Links ]

[12] B. Bennett, logical representations for automated reasoning about spatial relationships, University of Leeds, 1997.         [ Links ]

[13] C. Freksa, "Qualitative spatial reasoning," Cognitive and linguistic Aspects of Geographic Space, vol. 63, Springer-Verlag, pp. 361-372, 1991.         [ Links ]

[14] A.G. Cohn, B. Bennett, J. Gooday, and N. M. Gotts, "Qualitative spatial representation and reasoning with the region connection calculus," Geolnformatica, vol. 3, no. 3, Springer-Verlag, 1997, pp. 275-316.         [ Links ]

[15] A.G. Cohn and S. M. Hazarika, "Qualitative spatial representation and reasoning: An overview," Fundamenta Informaticae, vol. 46, no. 1-2,10 Press, pp. 1-29, 2001.         [ Links ]

[16] L. Clarke, "A calculus of individuals based on connection," Notre Dame Journal of Formal logic, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 204-218, 1981.         [ Links ]

[17] J. F. Allen, "Maintaining knowledge about temporal intervals," Communications of the ACM, vol. 26, no. 11, ACM, pp. 832-843, 1983.         [ Links ]

[18] D. Papadias and M. J. Egenhofer, "Algorithms for hierarchical spatial reasoning," Geolnformatica, vol. 1, no. 3, Springer, pp. 1-23, 1997.         [ Links ]

[19] M. J. Egenhofer and K. Al-Taha, "Reasoning about gradual changes of topological relationships," Theories and Methods of Spatio-Temporal Reasoning in Geographic Space, New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 196- 219, 1992.         [ Links ]

[20] M. Egenhofer and R. Franzosa, "Point-set topological spatial relations," International Journal of Geographical Information Science, vol. 5, no. 2, Taylor & Francis, pp. 161-174, 1991.         [ Links ]

[21] D. A. Randell, Z. Cui, and A. G. Cohn, "A spatial logic based on regions and connection," in Third International Conference on Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, vol. 92, Morgan Kaufmann, pp. 165- 176, 1992.         [ Links ]

[22] J. R. Hobbs and S. Narayanan, "Spatial representation and reasoning," Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science, John Wiley, Online Library, 2001.         [ Links ]

[23] El-Geresy and A. I. Abdelmoty, "SPARQS: a qualitative spatial reasoning engine," Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 17, no. 2, Elsevier, pp. 89-102, 2004.         [ Links ]

[24] R. Grutter, B. Bauer-Messmer, and M. Hageli, "Extending an ontology-based search with a formalism for spatial reasoning," Proceedings of the 2008 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, ACM, pp. 2266-2270, 2008.         [ Links ]

[25] S. Wang, D Liu, X. Wang, and J. Liu, "Spatial reasoning based spatial data mining for precision agriculture," Advanced Web and Network Technologies, and Applications, New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 506- 510,2006.         [ Links ]

[26] F. J. Escobar, S. Eagleson, and I. P. Williamson, "Automating the Administration Boundary Design Process using Hierarchical Spatial Reasoning Theory and Geographic Information Systems," International Journal of Geographical Information Science, vol. 17, no. 2, Taylor & Francis, pp. 99-118, 2003.         [ Links ]

[27] S. Wiebrock, L. Wittenburg, U. Schmid, and F. Wysotzki, "Inference and visualization of spatial relations," Spatial Cognition II, Springer-Verlag, pp.212-214, 2000.         [ Links ]

[28] E. Clementini, "Directional relations and frames of reference," Geolnformatica, Springer-Verlag, pp. 1-21, 2011.         [ Links ]

[29] Bailey-Kellogg and F. Zhao, "Qualitative spatial reasoning extracting and reasoning with spatial aggregates," Artificial Intelligence Magazine, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 47-60, 2003.         [ Links ]

[30] P. L. Schultz, H. W. Guesgen, and R. Amor, "Computer-human interaction issues when integrating qualitative spatial reasoning into geographic information systems," in Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGCHI, New Zealand Chapter's International Conference on Computer-Human Interaction: Design Centered HCI, ACM, pp. 43-51, 2006.         [ Links ]

[31] J. Brennan, and A. Sowmya, "Satellite image interpretation using spatial reasoning," in Australasian Remote Sensing Photogrammet. Conf, Sydney Australia, vol. 1, 1998.         [ Links ]

[32] T. Barkowsky, S. Bertel, D. Engel, and C. Freksa, "Design of an architecture for reasoning with mental images," in International Workshop on Spatial and Visual Components in Mental Reasoning about large-Scale Spaces, pp. 01-02, 2003.         [ Links ]

[33] B. Bennett, "What is a forest? On the vagueness of certain geographic concepts," Topoi, Springer-Verlag, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 189-201, 2003.         [ Links ]

[34] G. Cámara, M. J. Egenhofer, F. Fonseca, and A. M. Vieira, "What's in an Image ?" in Conference on Spatial Information Theory, New York: Springer-Verlag, pp.474-488, 2001.         [ Links ]

[35] M. Aiello, C. Areces, and M. D. Rijke, "Spatial reasoning for image retrieval," International Workshop on Description logics, vol. 22, New York: Springer-Verlag, 1999.         [ Links ]

[36] Mezaris, I. Kompatsiaris, and M. G. Strintzis, "An ontology approach to object-based image retrieval," International Conference on Image Processing, vol. 2, IEEE, pp. 2-51, 2003.         [ Links ]

[37] L. Hollink, G. Schreiber, J. Wielemaker, and B. Wielinga, "Semantic annotation of image collections," Knowledge Capture, pp. 41-48, 2003.         [ Links ]

[38] J. Inglada and J. Michel, "Qualitative spatial reasoning for high-resolution remote sensing image analysis," Geoscience and Remote Sensing, IEEE Transactions, vol. 47, no. 2, 2009, pp. 599-612.         [ Links ]

[39] M. Torres and S. Levachkine, "Representación ortológica basada en descriptores semánticos aplicada a objetos geográficos," Computación y Sistemas, vol. 12, no.3, pp.356-371, 2009.         [ Links ]

[40] M. Torres, R. Quintero, M. Moreno-Ibarra, R. Menchaca-Méndez, and G. Guzman, "GEONTO-MET: An approach to conceptualizing the geographic domain," International Journal of Geographical Information Science, vol. 25, no. 10, Taylor & Francis, pp. 1633-1657, 2011.         [ Links ]

[41] Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía, Diccionario de Datos del INEGI, INEGI, 2011.         [ Links ]

[42] National Center for Biomedical Ontology, Ontology of BIOMES, 2011.         [ Links ]

[43] M. Minsky, "K-lines: A Theory of Memory," Cognitive Science, vol. 4, no. 2, Elsevier, pp. 117-133, 1980.         [ Links ]

[44] M. Minsky, A framework for representing knowledge, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Memo No. 306, June 1974.         [ Links ]

[45] A. Salminen and F. Tompa, Communicating with XMI, New York: Springer-Verlag, ch. 1, 2011.         [ Links ]