SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.21 issue1Richness and abundance of diurnal raptors from Fernandez Canyon, Lerdo, DurangoFloral resources used by the Cozumel Emerald (Chlorostilbon forficatus) author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Huitzil

On-line version ISSN 1870-7459

Huitzil vol.21 n.1 Omitlán Jan./Jun. 2020  Epub July 03, 2020

https://doi.org/10.28947/hrmo.2020.21.1.433 

Artículos originales

Inter-annual diversity of birds in the shoreline of an island in the southern Gulf of Mexico

Diversidad interanual de aves en la línea de costa de una isla en el sur del Golfo de México

Julio César Canales-Delgadillo1  2  * 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2997-7849

Enrique Benítez-Orduña3 
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3408-5391

Rosela Yazmín Pérez-Ceballos1  2 
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3232-853X

Arturo Zaldívar Jiménez4 
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7473-2691

Mario Gómez-Ponce1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5094-1787

José Gilberto Cardoso-Mohedano1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2918-972X

Martín Merino-Ibarra5 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6690-3101

1 Instituto de Ciencias del Mar y Limnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Estación El Carmen, C.P. 24157, Ciudad del Carmen, Campeche, México. ryperezce@conacyt.mx, mgomez@cemarl.unam.mx, gcardoso@cmarl.unam.mx

2 Dirección de Cátedras Conacyt. Av. Insurgentes Sur 1582, Alcaldía Benito Juárez, C.P. 03940, Ciudad de México, México.

3 Biólogo independiente. Calle 48, No.19, Aviación, C.P. 24170, Ciudad del Carmen, Campeche, México. lebobenitez@gmail.com

4 ATEC Asesoría Técnica y Estudios Costeros SCP. C.P. 97283, Mérida, Yucatán, México. arturo.zaldivar@atecscp.com

5 Unidad Académica de Ecología y Biodiversidad Acuática, Instituto de Ciencias del Mar y Limnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. C.P. 04510, UNAM, Coyoacán, Ciudad de México, México. mmerino@cmarl.unam.mx


Abstract

Isla del Carmen lies within a natural protected area in the southern Gulf of Mexico and supports many plants and animal species of ecological conservation concern. However, rapid urbanization threatens its biodiversity. Although many animal groups here are relatively well studied, there is a lack of monitoring of the bird communities at least during the last 15 years. To contribute to the knowledge and to update the information on the birdlife in this area, we evaluated the inter-annual variation of the abundance and species richness of birds along the coastline of Isla del Carmen from 2012 to 2016 using survey transects on the shore and nearby urban areas. We recorded 137 bird species, from which more than half (56%) are considered migratory species, and 3% are exotics. Some of the recorded bird species, considered winter visitors, showed signs of reproductive activity, as evident reproductive plumage was observed during the local breeding season for more than one year, including seven species considered winter visitors. There was significant inter-annual variation in bird diversity and abundance, which may be linked to human activities and or coastal erosion processes. Twenty-three out of the 137 avian species recorded are first time reports in this area. The results presented here contribute to updating the knowledge on the resident and migratory avian community in the southern Gulf of Mexico, as well as on the distribution of bird species of international concern.

Keywords: abundance; coastal birds; diversity; island birds; Laguna de Términos; shoreline

Resumen

Isla del Carmen se encuentra en un área natural protegida del sur del Golfo de México y alberga muchas especies de interés para la conservación. Sin embargo, la rápida urbanización amenaza su biodiversidad. Aunque aquí muchos grupos animales están relativamente bien estudiados, carece de monitoreo de la comunidad de aves al menos en los últimos 15 años. Para contribuir a actualizar la información sobre las aves en esta área evaluamos la variación interanual de la abundancia y diversidad de 2012 a 2016. Utilizamos transectos de monitoreo en la costa y áreas urbanas cercanas. Registramos 137 especies, más de la mitad (56%) fueron especies migratorias y un 3% fueron exóticas. Algunas de las especies que registramos, consideradas visitantes de invierno, mostraron plumaje reproductivo evidente durante la temporada de reproducción local en más de un año durante el periodo de estudio. Hubo una variación interanual significativa en la diversidad y abundancia de aves, que podría vincularse a actividades humanas o procesos de erosión costera. Veintitrés de las 137 especies de aves registradas son reportadas por primera vez en esta área. Nuestros resultados actualizan el conocimiento sobre la comunidad aviar del sur del Golfo de México, y sobre la distribución de especies de interés internacional.

Palabras clave: abundancia; aves costeras; aves isleñas; diversidad; Laguna de Términos; litoral

Introduction

The Gulf of Mexico (GoM) holds a variety of areas that represent critical habitats for many vertebrate animals (Durán-González et al. 2005, Rosenberg et al. 2009, Ellis et al. 2011). Its geographic location allows the movement of many bird species from the Florida Everglades and the Texan estuarine marshes in the north, to Laguna Madre in Tamaulipas, and as far as Celestún in the Yucatan Peninsula in the south (Buler and Moore 2011). Together these sites represent about 2,500 miles of habitat with different forest cover types and wetlands of fresh and saltwater (Yáñez-Arancibia and Day 2005, Mendoza-González et al. 2012). Such a diversity of wetland ecosystems supports a great richness of resident and migratory birds. For example, together, areas such as Laguna Madre in Tamaulipas and the lagoon system of Alvarado in Veracruz, among other sites in the GoM and the Mexican Caribbean, hold about 30%-40% of the recorded bird species in Mexico (Gallardo et al. 2009). Such species richness highlights the ecological importance of the coastal plains of both the GoM and the Yucatan Peninsula and their marine ecosystems. For instance, nearly 75% of the world’s population of Redhead Duck (Aythya americana) spends the non-breeding season feeding on the seagrasses (Hodule wrightii) of Laguna Madre (Garza-Torres 2001, Ballard et al. 2010). While in Laguna de Alvarado exists one of the lasts viable Mexican wild populations of the Muscovy Duck (Cairina moschata) (Conabio 2002). On the other hand, the vegetation characteristics of the Yucatan Peninsula allow the coexistence of several migratory and resident bird species (Peralta-Peláez et al. 2009), where migrants find the places and resources to rest and strength back again (Deppe and Rotenberry 2008, Greenberg et al. 1993).

Isla del Carmen is located at the southern side of the GoM in Campeche Mexico, within the natural protected area of Laguna de Términos. This area is about 700,000 hectares (ha) in size, and together with Pantános de Centla, supports one of the more extensive and best-preserved mangrove forests of Mexico (Soto-Galera et al. 2009, Pérez-Ceballos et al. 2013). Because of the diversity of aquatic, waterfowl, and marine bird species occurring there, and because of its characteristics for the conservation of the biodiversity, Laguna de Términos is also recognized as a RAMSAR site (Ramsar 2017). Although Isla del Carmen lies within the natural protected area, it has experienced a rapid and poorly planned urban growth during the last 40 years (Pérez-Ceballos et al. 2013), causing mangrove deforestation, filling and drainage of wetlands, and loss of breeding grounds for coastal and aquatic birds (Ramos Miranda and Villalobos-Zapata 2015). Nonetheless, Isla del Carmen still holds areas of lowland rainforests and coastal dunes, which contribute to the landscape’s heterogeneity in the GoM region (Villalobos-Zapata and Mendoza Vega, 2010).

Even though there are about 370 bird species recorded for the whole area of Laguna de Términos (Conabio, 2015, 2018), there is a gap in the study and monitoring of birds on the coast of Isla del Carmen for at least 15 years. Moreover, the most recent wildlife studies carried out in Isla del Carmen cover the topic of avian species richness only in a general way (see, for example, Amador-del Ángel et al., 2013, 2015). Such studies are checklists without a sampling design that allows the estimation of population trends, densities, or abundances, precluding comparison through time to make inferences about the changes in the bird community. Because birds are one of the animal groups facing significant pressures due to environmental and habitat changes (Julliard et al. 2004, Seress and Liker 2015), it is necessary to update the knowledge of this group of animals occurring along the coast of Isla del Carmen. Also, the presence of several species in Isla del Carmen mismatches the seasonality reported in the literature. Furthermore, some shorebird species considered winter visitors, might have local populations living there, with the potential to breed in the dunes or at the islets surrounding this island of the GoM.

This work aims to promote the conservation of migratory and resident bird species occurring at the coastline of the region of the GoM by contributing with new information about the bird community of Isla del Carmen. Because most of the previous studies in this island focused on the riverine area and mangrove systems (Amador-del Ángel et al. 2013), we surveyed land, shore, and marine birds at the beach areas and their nearby urban zones, which remain relatively unstudied.

Methods

Study area

Our study area is a beach zone of approximately 120 ha, known as Playa Norte (PN), located at the north side of Ciudad del Carmen, within Isla del Carmen, Campeche (Figure 1). Although this is one of the most urbanized locations of Isla del Carmen, there are still some though fragmented coastal dune areas. The dune vegetation includes small patches of seagrape (Coccoloba uvifera) mixed with shoreline purslane (Sesuvium portulacastrum), bayhopes (Ipomea pes-caprae, Ipomea sp.), Mackenzie bean (Canavalia rosea), Gregg’s amaranth (Amaranthus greggii), sea lavender (Tournefortia gnaphalodes) and wild maracuja (Passiflora foetida) (Guadarrama et al. 2014). There is also a small patch (< 1 ha) of the button mangrove (Conocarpus erectus) on the west side of the study area. The height of the herbs and bushes ranges from approximately 3 cm to 135 cm, while the mangrove trees can reach about 3.5 m. The average vegetation cover in the study area is approximately 25% - 35% (López-Rosas et al. 2014). At the urbanized zone in the study area several introduced species such as the coconut tree (Cocos nucifera), the australian pine tree (Casuarina equisetifolia), the country almond tree (Terminalia cappata), as well as the native rosy trumpet tree (Tabebuia rosea) are present at the sidewalk and central ridges of the streets. The annual average rainfall is about 1,420 mm, and the annual mean temperature about 27°C (David and Kjerfve 1998).

Figure 1 Study area and survey transects’ location in the shoreline and adjacent urban area of Playa Norte Ciudad del Carmen, Campeche. The yellow dotted lines show the location of the surveyed transects from January 2012 to December 2016. 

Several disturbing activities for birds occur within the study area. The most evident are recreational-related, such as horse riding, ATV driving on the beach and dunes, and increased tourism density (López-Rosas et al. 2014). On the other hand, activities such as sand-dredging and building of port infrastructure, that might trigger important changes in the dynamics of the local marine currents, erosion and sedimentation patterns (Rosen and Vajda 1982), may affect the food availability and the habitat quality for many bird species.

Surveys

A five-year bird survey was conducted from the beginning of 2012 to the end of 2016 on the coastline of PN to assess species richness and abundance. We performed unidirectional surveys along two strip-transects of approximately 1 km and 4 km in length each (Figure 1).

The shorter transect included a section of the urban area adjacent to the beach. There, natural vegetation has been replaced by australian pine, coconut trees, and different ornamental tree species. Formerly flood plains adjacent to the main street of PN have been transformed into football fields or parking lots. The longer transect included coastal dune habitat where dominant vegetation is the sea grape and the button mangrove on the west side of the transect. On the east side of the study area, most vegetation has been removed, and the beach is used for touristic activities.

The surveys were systematically conducted by walk once a week every month during the entire five-year period. For each transect, a total of 48 replicates were carried out each year. Recording and counts of bird species were conducted from 07:00 to 10:00 hours (UTC-6/UTC-5 according to Mexico’s winter and summertime), by a single observer. Because bird groups with different detectability occur within the study area, we used two range distances to record bird species along the transects. For species such as egrets, ibises, sandpipers, willets, oystercatchers, and other shore and marine species, we recorded all seen or heard birds within the first 80 m on each side of the long transect. For land birds such as warblers, flycatchers, and other mid-sized and small species, we counted all birds seen or heard within the first 20 m on each side of the short or long transect (Nur et al. 1999). To ensure that the records did not exceed the range distances, we used a digital range finder to measure the distance from the observer to groups or individual birds.

We determined the seasonal status of all species according to the species’ account of Birds of North America (http://birdsna.org), and by literature (Howell and Webb 1995, Kaufman 2005). We used the following categories: winter visitor (WV), the species that spend the wintertime in the study area. Resident breeders (RB) are the species that inhabit permanently on the coast of Isla del Carmen. Summer residents (SR) include species that arrive in the mid-spring to breed in the area and leave in early autumn. Transient migrant (TM), the species that visit Isla del Carmen in winter only for a few days to rest and feed. Exotic species (EX) are the non-native species living in our study site. To verify whether the species on our list were previously recorded in our study area, we consulted the distribution and records of each species on the database of eBird (http://ebird.org/ebird/map). Determination of the conservation status was according to the Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-059- SEMARNAT-2010, the Mexican list of native wildlife species under threat (Semarnat 2010), which includes categories such as threatened species, species under special protection, and species under extinction risk. The observed plumage characteristics were assessed using the identification field guides of Dunn and Alderfer (2011), Kaufman (2005), and Pyle (1997). To avoid confusion between incomplete basic plumage and reproductive plumage, we also investigated whether the birds in our list show one or two plumage types yearly (Pittaway 2000).

Data analysis

We estimated the Shannon-Wiener diversity index (H’) for each sampled year as: H=-i=1Spilogbpi, where S is the number of species in each sample (the sum of all recorded species in both transects per year), p i is the proportion of species i, and b represents the natural logarithm of p i . Dominance was assessed through Pileou’s evenness index that is a measure of the numerical equality of the species in the community: J=H’/log(S). To estimate the expected species richness, we pooled data from both transects to obtain a subsample of the total community. Then, we generated a randomly rarefied community using 300 permutations to construct a species accumulation curve from the beginning to the end of our sampling period through the function rarefy implemented in the R package “vegan” (Oksanen et al. 2015). To identify the most common birds in the study area, we ranked the species according to their abundance in each sampled year and afterward using the total sum of such abundance to rank it across the entire period of study. These analyses were carried out using the VEGAN package implemented in the statistical software R (Oksanen et al. 2015, R Development Core Team 2018). We also compared abundance between pairs of years using the non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test. To compare the estimated H’ over years, we calculated the effective number of species as D = exp(H’) in each sampled year, according to Jost (2006). This approach is useful to linearize the values of H’, then being able to perform parametric tests on the magnitude of change of H’ between two samples. To estimate the proportional change (M) of D between pairs of years, we divided: Dmin/Dmax = M. A value of M near 1 means that the magnitude of the change is not strong, while values near 0, reveal changes of high magnitude in H’. To test for statistical significance of such differences, we used the Hutcheson’s t-test, which estimates p values and confidence intervals from species diversity measures: t=Ha-HbSHa2+SHb2 (Hutcheson 1970). Where the subscripts a and b are H’ of years 1 and 2 respectively, and S 2 is the variance of H’ for these years. For this analysis, we use the formulae available in:

http://www.loujost.com/Statistics%20and%20Physics/Diversity%20and%20Similarity/How%20to%20compare%20the%20diversities%20of%20two%20communities.htm.

All tests were significant at P < 0.05, if not indicated otherwise.

Results

We recorded 137 species belonging to 33 families (Appendix 1). According to the species accumulation curve, longer monitoring could be necessary to find the true species richness in the study area (Appendix 2). However, for each sampling year, the observed species richness was higher or equal to the expected richness (Table 1). Thus, our results properly represent the species richness on the coastline of Isla del Carmen. Regarding the number of species, the richest families were Scolopacidae (n = 20), Parulidae (n = 16), and Laridae (n = 13).

Table 1 Observed (SRobs) and expected (SRexp) species richness, and the evenness index (J) estimated for each sampling year (2012-2016) in the shoreline of Isla del Carmen Campeche. 

Years 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
SRobs 56.00 95.00 98.00 81.00 111.00
SRexp 51.89 85.29 86.79 81.00 108.79
J 0.47 0.58 0.58 0.67 0.61

The families with the greater abundances were Laridae, Scolopacidae and Pelecanidae (n = 21,823; n = 5,123; and n = 1,614 counts of individuals respectively). The analysis of the annual abundance showed a significant decrease at the end of the sampling period (Kruskal-Wallis test, χ2 = 39.23, df = 4, P = 0.001, Figure 2a). The top ten most abundant species (500-9600 individuals) were the Royal Tern (Thalasseus maximus), the Least Tern (Sternula antillarum), the Willet (Tringa semipalmata), the Semipalmated Plover (Charadrius semipalmatus), the Sanderling (Calidris alba), the Brown Pelican (Pelecanus occidentalis), the Laughing Gull (Leucophaeus atricilla), the Sandwich Tern (T. sandvicensis), the Black Skimmer (Rhynchops niger), and the Short-billed Dowitcher (Limnodromus griseus). The last four species showed a decreasing pattern in abundance over the sampling years (Figure 3). Nonetheless, the high abundance of species such as the Laughing Gull, the Willet, and the Brown Pelican, skew the evenness (Table 1). We did find evidence of significant proportional changes in H’ across the years. Only from 2013 to 2014, the change of H’ was negligible (Table 2). Although the inter-annual variation of H’ increased over time, we did detect a significant drop between 2015 and 2016 (Figure 2b).

Figure 2 The abundance (a) and diversity (b) of the avian community of the shoreline of Isla del Carmen over a five-year sampling period. In (a), the black dots are counts of the different species in the study area, while the stars over the dots show significant differences in the annual abundance (P < 0.05). In (b), the black dots are the estimated values of H’. 

Figure 3 Rank plot of the ten most abundant bird species per year in the shoreline of Isla del Carmen. Each colored line represents a sampling year (2012-2016). The thinner black lines show the true position of each label. The bird species in the plot are: Sandwich tern (ST), Laughing gull (LG), Black skimmer (BSK), Brown pelican (BP), Least tern (LT), Willet (WL), Royal tern (RT), Short-billed dowitcher (SD), Sanderling (SA), Semipalmated plover (SP), Black-necked stilt (BS), American oystercatcher (AO), Black-bellied plover (BBP), Great egret (GE), Snowy egret (SE), Neotropical cormorant (nc), Least sandpiper (LS). 

Table 2 The estimated proportional change of bird diversity (M = D min )/D max ) between pairs of years (below diagonal) in the shoreline of Isla del Carmen Campeche, and the significance of this change (above diagonal) according to Hutcheson’s t test. 

Year 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
2012 * < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001
2013 0.49 * 0.478 < 0.001 < 0.001
2014 0.47 0.95 * < 0.001 < 0.001
2015 0.34 0.69 0.73 * 0.003
2016 0.37 0.76 0.80 0.91 *

Less than half (40%) of the recorded species are residents in the study area, being Ardeidae the family with more resident species. About 56% of the recorded species are considered WV or TM, mainly belonging to Scolopacidae and Parulidae (n = 18 and n =15, respectively, Appendix 1). About 3% of the species on the coastline of Isla del Carmen are non-native birds. Specifically, we recorded the Eurasian Collared-Dove (Streptopelia decaocto), the Rock Pigeon (Columba livia), the Burrowing Parrot (Cyanoliseus patagonus) and the Monk Parakeet (Myiopsitta monachus). We did observe all these species feeding and breeding (as indicated by the presence of juveniles and nests) within the urbanized areas adjacent to the beach during our study. Approximately 33% of the recorded species showed reproductive plumage (Supporting file Table S1). However, only eight species, including the Ruddy Turnstone (Arenaria interpres), the Sanderling, the Semipalmated Plover, the Black-bellied Plover (Pluvialis squatarola), and the Willet, considered WV in our study area, showed reproductive plumage during the local breeding season (April to September, Table 3) in at least three months of each of the five-year study period.

Table 3 Number of individuals of different species showing reproductive plumage during the local breeding season in the shoreline of Isla del Carmen Campeche through years (2012-2016). Only sightings of species showing signs or reproductive activity for ≥ three months per season, or ≥ 25 total individuals are shown. 

  Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Total
Charadriidae
Charadrius semipalmatus 0 14 4 0 2 3 23
Pluvialis squatarola 2 26 1 0 15 9 53
Laridae
Sternula antillarum 68 65 123 126 86 66 534
Scolopacidae
Actitis macularius 8 17 1 4 8 3 41
Arenaria interpres 0 12 2 2 22 2 40
Calidris alba 0 6 0 2 17 0 25
Tringa semipalmata 0 0 0 5 31 40 76
Total 78 140 131 139 181 123 792

According to eBird database, there are no previous records in our study area for 23 species reported here (Appendix 1). Charadriidae, Scolopacidae, Laridae, and Tyrannidae were the families with most of the novel records at this location of the GoM. Eighteen of the recorded species are under some conservation status: threatened species = 4, extinction risk = 5, and special protection = 9. Finally, we obtained a collection of digital photographic material of each one of the species reported here. Such a collection was deposited at the ICMyL-UNAM Estación el Carmen.

Discussion

We recorded 137 bird species at the beaches of Isla del Carmen, Campeche. This diversity represents about 34% of the avian families, and almost 12% of the bird species recognized in Mexico (Navarro and Sánchez-Gónzalez 2003, Navarro-Sigüenza et al. 2014). Moreover, our findings represent 31% to 41% of the avian richness reported for the GoM region (Gallardo et al. 2009).

Although today the urbanization severely modifies about 20% (3,000 ha) of the surface of Isla del Carmen, the diversity found in our study site is comparable with that reported for other islands of the Caribbean (Appendix 3). The number of bird species at the beaches of Isla del Carmen is also similar to the richness at some areas of evergreen forest in the inland of Tabasco (González-Valdivia et al. 2012). Such diversity is possible because of the high proportion of migratory birds (57%) that use the island as a stopover site, winter refuge, or as breeding ground during the summer (Langin et al. 2009, Sheehy et al. 2011). Inter-annual variation in abundance over the years was due to lower counts of species that usually flock in big groups, such as pelicans, sandpipers, terns, and plovers, which were in high numbers at the beginning of our study. Such changes are likely the result of an increased tourism density, but additional studies are required to support this hypothesis. Through the survey time, the lower dominance of birds such as the Sandwich and Royal terns , the Brown Pelican and the Black Skimmer, allowed the values of H’ and J’ to increase. However, the proportion of species recorded only three times or less (25%) in a five years period, kept the evenness only moderately balanced.

We did observe significant differences in the proportional change of H’ between 2012 and the remaining years. Such a result was due to an increased number of passerine species over time. Although most of the beach and the nearby urban areas lost their natural vegetation cover (mainly mangrove) in the last decade, fragmented dune vegetation remains and shows signs of recovery. These few remnants at the outer edge of the urban zone are attractive to resident and migrant birds, and favor the detection of an increased number of small species such as vegetation gleaners (Tavares et al. 2015), thus, increasing the estimates of H’. However, we also observed a significant decrease in H’ from 2015 to 2016, as indicated by the drop of the M value. As variation in species richness and evenness relate to productivity, niche and food availability (Symonds and Johnson 2008), the observed differences could be linked to the change of land use of the coastal dunes, to the human activities carried out in the study area, or both (Weston et al. 2014). Unfortunately, there are no previous studies in, or close to our study area, to make inferences about whether our estimations lay within the normal parameters of variation in the bird community of Isla del Carmen.

Conversely, the increase of the recreational ground area (which includes the building of palapas, parking lots) and the constant presence of people, along with the artisanal fishing activities near to the beach, are potential attractors to synanthropic species. It is demonstrated that urban areas and intercity roads facilitate foraging activities of synanthropic birds of different guilds (D’Amico et al. 2013), especially those with generalist habits (grackles and gulls). Moreover, the abundance of some piscivorous species such as pelicans and gulls can be increased in areas close to human settlements (0-2 km), but might negatively affect less-disturbance tolerant species such as terns, skimmers, herons, and willets within distances under 2 km (Lafferty 2001, Tavares et al. 2015). Additionally, the abundance of water birds can decrease by temporal or definitive habitat loss due to sea-level rise or coastal erosion (Nores 2011). On Isla del Carmen, there is a continuous process of erosion of the shoreline. For instance, between 1975 and 2007 Isla del Carmen lost beach area in a range of 8-177 meters at different points on the coast of the island (Torres Rodríguez et al. 2011). Thus, the inter-annual bird abundance observed may be linked to such erosive processes.

Most of the recorded species under protection status by Mexican (Semarnat 2010) and international agencies (IUCN 2016) are shorebirds. Therefore, the coast of Isla del Carmen, as well as the adjacent habitats in Laguna de Términos are critical for the conservation of the avian richness moving along the GoM region. The threats to the species of national and international conservation concern range from habitat loss by dredging, invasive plant species, urban, industrial, and agricultural development, to the commercial and touristic development of the coastal areas, as well as the illegal species trade (IUCN 2016). At least several of these activities occur in our study site. On the other hand, the literature classifies species such as the Ruddy Turnstone, the Sanderling, the Semipalmated Plover, the Black-bellied Plover, and the Willet as WV or TM in our study area (Kaufman 2005, Dunn and Alderfer 2011). However, we did observe individuals showing reproductive plumage within the local breeding season (April to September), suggesting that these species could have reproductive activity locally, at nearby zones in the islets or coastal dunes of Laguna de Términos. Nevertheless, further monitoring is required.

Although Isla del Carmen supports about 12% of the species richness of Mexico and around a third of the species diversity present in the GoM region, assessments on the habitat quality and food availability for several bird species are required, especially for less well-known shorebird species in the study area. To better understand the factors related to the inter-annual variation of diversity and abundance of the coastal bird community in Isla del Carmen, further monitoring and analyses are encouraged. Our findings contribute to updating the knowledge on the avian community in the southern GoM, as well as on the distributional range of species of conservation concern.

Acknowledgments

All authors thank Hernán Álvarez Guillén and Andrés Reda Deara from ICML-UNAM El Carmen for their assistance in data field management, and to two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions to improve our work. We especially appreciate the help of Comisión Nacional de Areas Naturales Protegidas (Conanp) to conduct our research. CDJC and PCRY are Conacyt Research Fellows commissioned to the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (project No. 345). No founding for this research was granted.

Literature cited

Amador-del Ángel L.E., Endañú-Huerta E., López-Contreras J.E., Wakida-Kusunoki A.T., Guevara-Carrió E., Brito-Pérez R. 2015. Fauna exótica establecida e invasora en el Área de Protección de Flora y Fauna Laguna de Términos, Campeche: estado actual, impactos, necesidades y perspectivas. In: Amador-del Ángel L.E., Frutos-Cortés M., editores. Problemas contemporáneos regionales del sureste mexicano. El caso del estado de Campeche. Ciudad del Carmen (Campeche): Universidad Autónoma del Carmen. p. 234-279. [ Links ]

Amador-del Ángel L.E., Endañú E., López E., Guevara E. 2013. Aves comunes en el ecosistema manglar de la Laguna de Términos. p. 28. [ Links ]

Ballard B.M., James J.D., Bingham R.L., Petrie M.J., Wilson B.C. 2010. Coastal pond use by redheads wintering in the Laguna Madre, Texas. Wetlands 30: 669-674. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-010-0076-0 [ Links ]

Buler J.J., Moore F.R. 2011. Migrant-habitat relationships during stopover along an ecological barrier: extrinsic constraints and conservation implications. Journal of Ornithology 152:101-112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-010-0640-7 [ Links ]

[Conabio] Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiverisdad. 2002. Acceso a la información de cada AICA por mapa [accessed 26 June 2019]. Available from: http://conabioweb.conabio.gob.mx/aicas/doctos/aicasmapa.htmlLinks ]

[Conabio] Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiverisdad. 2015. AICA Laguna de Términos [accessed 26 June 2019]. Available from: http://avesmx.conabio.gob.mx/EspeciesRegion.html#AICA170Links ]

[Conabio] Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiverisdad. 2018. EncicloVida [accessed 26 June 2019]. Available from: http://enciclovida.mx/Links ]

D’Amico M., Rouco C., Russell J.C., Román J., Revilla E. 2013 Invaders on the road: synanthropic bird foraging along highways. Oecologia Australis. 17: 86-95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4257/oeco.2013.1701.08 [ Links ]

David L.T., Kjerfve B. 1998. Tides and currents in a two-inlet coastal lagoon: Laguna de Términos, México. Continental Shelf Research. 18:1057-1079. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-4343(98)00033-8 [ Links ]

Deppe J.L., Rotenberry J.T. 2008. Scale-dependent habitat use by fall migratory birds: vegetation architecture, floristics, and geographic consistency. Ecological Monographs. 78: 461-487. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1890/07-0163.1 [ Links ]

Dunn J.L., Alderfer J. 2011. Field Guide to the Birds of North America. Sixth edition. Washington (DC): National Geographic Society. [ Links ]

Durán-González A., Laguarda-Figueras A., Solís-Marin F.A., Buitrón Sánchez B.E., Ahearn C.G., Torres-Vega J. 2005. Equinodermos (Echinodermata) de las aguas mexicanas del Golfo de México. Revista de Biología Tropical. 53:53-68. [ Links ]

Ellis S.L., Incze L.S., Lawton P., Ojaveer H., MacKenzie B.R., Pitcher C.R., Shirley T.C., Eero M., Tunnell J.W., Doherty P.J., Zeller B.M. 2011. Four regional marine biodiversity studies: Approaches and contributions to ecosystem-based management. PLoS ONE. 6:e18997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018997 [ Links ]

Gallardo J., Macías V., Velarde E. 2009. Birds (Vertebrata: Aves) of the Gulf of Mexico. In: Felder D.L., Camp D.K., editors. Gulf of Mexico-Origin, Waters, and Biota. Vol. 1 Biodiversity. College Station (Tx.): Texas A&M University Press. p. 1321-1342. [ Links ]

Garza-Torres H. 2001. Avifauna de la Laguna Madre, Tamaulipas. Biodiversidad marina y costera de México. México (DF): Conabio-CIQRO. p. 103. [ Links ]

González-Valdivia N.A., Arriaga-Weiss S.L., Ochoa-Gaona S., Ferguson B.G., Kampichler C., Pozo C. 2012. Ensambles de aves diurnas a través de un gradiente de perturbación en un paisaje en el sureste de México. Acta Zoológica Mexicana 28(2):237-269. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21829/azm.2012.282831 [ Links ]

Greenberg R., Niven D.K., Hopp S., Boone C. 1993. Frugivory and coexistence in a resident and a migratory vireo on the Yucatan Peninsula. The Condor. 95:990-999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1369434 [ Links ]

Guadarrama P., Salinas-Peba L., García-Bielma M., Endañú-Huerta E., Hernández-Cortés J., Ramos-Zapata J. 2014. Nota sobre la florística y estado de conservación de remanentes de vegetación de duna costera de Isla del Carmen, Campeche, México. Botanical Sciences. 92:453. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17129/botsci.115 [ Links ]

Howell S.N.G., Webb S. 1995. A Guide to the Birds of Mexico and Northern Central America. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-854012-4 [ Links ]

Hutcheson K. 1970. A test for comparing diversities based on the Shannon formula. Journal of Theoretical Biology 29:151-154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(70)90124-4 [ Links ]

IUCN. (2016). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2016-3. Retrieved from The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species [accessed 26 June 2019]. Available from: http://www.iucnredlist.org/Links ]

Jost L. (2006). Entropy and diversity. Oikos. 113:363-375. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2006.0030-1299.14714.x [ Links ]

Julliard R., Jiguet F., Couvet D. 2004. Common birds facing global changes: what makes a species at risk? Global Change Biology. 10:148-154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2003.00723.x [ Links ]

Kaufman K. 2005. Guía de Campo de las Aves de Norte América. New York: Hillstrar Editions L. C. 391 p. [ Links ]

Lafferty K.D. 2001. Birds at a Southern California beach: Seasonality, habitat use and disturbance by human activity. Biodiversity and Conservation. 10:1949-1962. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013195504810 [ Links ]

Langin K.M., Marra P.P., Németh Z., Moore F.R., Kyser T.K., Ratcliffe L.M. 2009. Breeding latitude and timing of spring migration in songbirds crossing the Gulf of Mexico. Journal of Avian Biology. 40:309-316. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-048X.2008.04496.x [ Links ]

López-Rosas H., Moreno-Casasola P., Infante M.D.M., Espejel I., Jiménez-Orocio O., Martínez M.L., Rodríguez-Revelo N., Espejel González V.E., Monroy R. 2014. Diagnóstico por estado: Campeche. En: Martínez M.L., Moreno-Casasola P., Espejel I., Jiménez-Orocio O., Infante M.D.M., Rodríguez-Revelo N., editores. Diagnóstico de las dunas costeras de México. México (DF): Semarnat-Conafor. p. 169-180. [ Links ]

Mendoza-González G., Martínez M.L., Lithgow D., Pérez-Maqueo O., Simonin P. 2012. Land use change and its effects on the value of ecosystem services along the coast of the Gulf of Mexico. Ecological Economics. 82:23-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.07.018 [ Links ]

Navarro A.G., Sánchez-González L.A. 2003. La Diversidad de las Aves. En: Gómez-de Silva H., Oliveras A., editores. Conservación de Aves: Experiencias en México. México (DF): Cipamex, Conabio, NFWF. p. 24-85. [ Links ]

Navarro-Singüenza A.G., Rebón Gallardo M.F., Gordillo-Martínez A., Peterson A.T., Berlanga-García H., Sánchez-González L.A. 2014. Biodiversidad de aves en México. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad. 85:476-495. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7550/rmb.41882 [ Links ]

Nores M. 2011. Long-term waterbird fluctuations in Mar Chiquita Lake, Central Argentina. Waterbirds. 34:381-388. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1675/063.034.0314 [ Links ]

Nur N., Jones S.L., Geupel G.R. 1999. A statistical guide to data analysis of avian monitoring programs. Washington (DC): U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, BTP-R6001-1999. [ Links ]

Oksanen J., Blanchet F.G., Kindt R., Legendre P., Minchin P.R., O’Hara R.B., Simpson G.L., Solymos P., Stevens M.H., Wagner H. 2015. vegan: Community Ecology Package [accessed 10 June 2019]. Available from: http://cran.r-project.org/package=veganLinks ]

Peralta-Peláez L.A., Infante Mata D., Moreno-Casasola P. 2009. Construcción e instalación de piezómetros. En: Moreno-Casasola P., Warner B., editores. Breviario para describir, observar y manejar humedales. Xalapa (Veracruz): Instituto de Ecología A.C. p. 17-30. [ Links ]

Pérez-Ceballos R., Zaldívar-Jiménez A., Ladrón de Guevara P., Amador del Angel L.E., Endañú-Huerta E., Guevara-Carrió E., Herrera-Silveira J. 2013. Los manglares de la región Atasta-Sabancuy, Campeche, México. Programa piloto de conservación y restauración de manglares dentro del Proyecto Integral para el Gran Ecosistema Marino del Golfo de México. Ciudad del Carmen, Campeche. [ Links ]

Pittaway, R. 2000. Plumage and molt terminology. Ontario Birds. 18(1):27-43. [ Links ]

Pyle, P. 1997. Identification guide to North American birds. Part 1. Bolinas, CA. Slate Creek Press. [ Links ]

R Core Team 2018. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. [ Links ]

Ramos Miranda J., Villalobos-Zapata J.G. 2015. Aspectos socioambientales de la región de Laguna de Términos, Campeche. Campeche: Universidad Autónoma de Campeche. México. ISBN 978-607-8444-12-0. [ Links ]

[Ramsar] Convención de Ramsar. 2017. Ramsar sites and the Ramsar list [accessed 26 June 2019]. Available from: https://rsis.ramsar.org/ris/1356Links ]

Rosen D.S., Vajda M. 1982. Sedimentological Influences of detached breakwaters. In: Coastal Engineering. New York (NY): American Society of Civil Engineers. p. 1930-1949. [ Links ]

Rosenberg G., Moretzsohn F., García E.F. 2009. Gastropoda (Mollusca) of the Gulf of Mexico. In: Felder D.L., Camp D.K., editors. Gulf of Mexico-Origin, Waters, and Biota. Vol. 1, Biodiversity. College Station (Tx): Texas A&M University Press. p. 579-699. [ Links ]

[Semarnat] Secretaría del Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales. 2010. Diario Oficial de la Federación. Norma Oficial Mexicana. NOM-059-SEMARNAT-2010 [accessed 26 June 2019]. Available from: http://dof.gob.mx/nota_detalle_popup.php?codigo=5173091Links ]

Seress G., Liker A. 2015. Habitat urbanization and its effects on birds. Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae. 61:373-408. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17109/azh.61.4.373.2015 [ Links ]

Sheehy J., Taylor C.M., Norris D.R. 2011. The importance of stopover habitat for developing effective conservation strategies for migratory animals. Journal of Ornithology. 152:161-168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-011-0682-5 [ Links ]

Soto-Galera E., Piera J., López P. 2009. Spatial and temporal land cover changes in Terminos Lagoon Reserve, Mexico. Revista de Biología Tropical. 58(2):565-575. [ Links ]

Symonds M.R.E., Johnson C.N. 2008 Species richness and evenness in Australian birds. The American Naturalist. 171:480-490. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/528960 [ Links ]

Tavares C.D., Guadagnin D.L., De Moura J.F., Siciliano S., Merico A. 2015. Environmental and anthropogenic factors structuring waterbird habitats of tropical coastal lagoons: Implications for management. Biological Conservation. 186:12-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIOCON.2015.02.027 [ Links ]

Torres Rodríguez V., Márquez G.A., Bolongaro C.A., Chavarría H.J., Expósito D.G., Márquez G.E. 2011. Tasa de erosión y vulnerabilidad costera en el estado de Campeche debidos a efectos del cambio climático. En: Botello A.V., Villanueva-Fragoso S., Gutiérrez J., Rojas Galaviz J.L., editores. Campeche, Camp. Vulnerabilidad de las zonas costeras mexicanas ante el cambio climático. Instituto EPOMEX. 2a. edición. p. 325-344. ISBN: 978-607-7887-30-0. [ Links ]

Villalobos-Zapata J.G., Mendoza Vega J. 2010. La Biodiversidad en Campeche: Estudio de Estado. México: Conabio, Gobierno del Estado de Campeche, UAC, ECOSUR. ISBN 978-607-7887-21-8. [ Links ]

Weston M.A., Schlacher T.A., Lynn D. 2014 Pro-environmental beach driving is uncommon and ineffective in reducing disturbance to beach-dwelling birds. Environmental Management. 53:999-1004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-014-0256-4 [ Links ]

Yáñez-Arancibia A., Day J.W. 2005. The Gulf of Mexico: Towards an integration of coastal management with large marine ecosystem management. Ocean and Coastal Management. 47(11-12):537-563. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2004.12.001 [ Links ]

Editor asociado: Borja Milá Valcárcel

Contribución de cada uno de los autores: JCD and LEBO: conceived the study. LEBO: carried out the monitoring and data collection. JCD, RPC, AZJ: analyzed the data and written the manuscript. MGP, MMI, JGCM: revised, improved, and authorized the manuscript.

Cómo citar este documento: Canales-Delgadillo J.C., Benítez-Orduña E., Pérez-Ceballos R.Y., Zaldívar Jiménez A., Gómez-Ponce M., Cardoso-Mohedano J.G., Merino-Ibarra, M. 2020. Inter-annual diversity of birds in the shoreline of an island in the southern Gulf of Mexico. Huitzil 21(1):e565. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28947/hrmo.2020.21.1.433

APPENDIX 1

List of bird species recorded at the coastline of Isla del Carmen, Campeche, from 2012-2016. Data on seasonality (SEAS), previous (REC = YES) or novel records (REC = NO), reproductive activity (REP), and conservation status (NOM-059) are shown. The categories for seasonality are: RB = resident breeder, WV = winter visitor, TM = transient, EX = exotic. REP was determined either by the presence of nests and juveniles or by the presence of reproductive plumage in more than one month during the local reproductive season (April to September) in more than one year. 

Family/Species SEAS REC REP NOM-059
Anatidae
Cairina moschata RB Yes No Extinction risk
Dendrocygna bicolor RB No No No applicable
Mergus serrator WV No No No applicable
Anas discors WV Yes No No applicable
Fregatidae
Fregata magnificens RB Yes Yes No applicable
Phalacrocoracidae
Phalacrocorax auritus RB Yes Yes No applicable
Phalacrocorax brasilianus RB Yes Yes No applicable
Pelecanidae
Pelecanus erythrorhynchos WV Yes No No applicable
Pelecanus occidentalis RB Yes Yes No applicable
Ardeidae
Ardea alba RB Yes Yes No applicable
Ardea herodias RB Yes Yes No applicable
Bubulcus ibis RB Yes No No applicable
Butorides virescens RB Yes Yes No applicable
Egretta caerulea RB Yes No No applicable
Egretta rufescens RB Yes Yes Special Protection
Egretta thula RB Yes Yes No applicable
Egretta tricolor RB Yes Yes No applicable
Ixobrychus exilis RB No No Special Protection
Nyctanassa violacea RB Yes Yes No applicable
Threskiornithidae
Platalea ajaja WV Yes No No applicable
Ciconiidae
Mycteria americana RB Yes No Threatened
Cathartidae
Cathartes aura RB Yes Yes No applicable
Cathartes burrovianus RB Yes Yes Special Protection
Coragyps atratus RB Yes Yes No applicable
Pandionidae
Pandion haliaetus WV Yes No No applicable
Accipitridae
Buteo albonotatus WV Yes No Special Protection
Buteogallus anthracinus RB Yes Yes Special Protection
Geranoaetus albicaudatus WV Yes No Special Protection
Rupornis magnirostris RB Yes No No applicable
Falconidae
Caracara cheriway RB Yes Yes No applicable
Falco peregrinus WV Yes No Special Protection
Falco sparverius WV Yes No No applicable
Charadriidae
Charadrius collaris RB No No No applicable
Charadrius melodus WV No No Extinction risk
Charadrius nivosus WV Yes No Threatened
Charadrius semipalmatus WV No Yes No applicable
Charadrius vociferus WV No No No applicable
Charadrius wilsonia WV Yes Yes No applicable
Pluvialis squatarola WV No Yes No applicable
Haemantopodidae Yes No No applicable
Haemantopus palliatus WV Yes No Extinction risk
Recurvirostridae
Himantopus mexicanus RB Yes No No applicable
Recurvirostra americana WV Yes Yes No applicable
Scolopacidae
Actitis macularius RB Yes Yes No applicable
Arenaria interpres TM Yes Yes No applicable
Calidris alba WV Yes Yes No applicable
Calidris alpina WV No No No applicable
Calidris bairdii WV No No No applicable
Calidris canutus WV Yes No Extinction risk
Calidris himatopus WV Yes No No applicable
Calidris mauri WV Yes Yes No applicable
Calidris melanotos WV Yes No No applicable
Calidris minutilla WV Yes Yes No applicable
Calidris pusilla WV Yes Yes No applicable
Calidris subruficollis WV No No No applicable
Limnodromus griseus WV Yes No No applicable
Limosa fedoa WV Yes No No applicable
Numenius americanus WV Yes No No applicable
Numenius phaeopus WV Yes No No applicable
Tringa flavipes WV Yes No No applicable
Tringa melanoleuca WV Yes No No applicable
Tringa semipalmata WV Yes Yes No applicable
Tringa solitaria WV Yes No No applicable
Laridae
Chlidonias niger WV Yes No No applicable
Gelochelidon nilotica RB Yes No No applicable
Hydroprogne caspia WV Yes No No applicable
Larus argentatus WV Yes No No applicable
Larus atricilla RB Yes Yes No applicable
Larus delawarensis WV No No No applicable
Larus pipixcan WV No No No applicable
Rynchops niger WV Yes No No applicable
Sterna forsteri WV Yes No No applicable
Sterna hirundo WV Yes No No applicable
Sternula antillarum SR Yes Yes Threatened
Thalasseus maximus WV No No No applicable
Thalasseus sandvicensis WV Yes No No applicable
Columbidae
Columba livia EX Yes Yes Introduced
Columbina inca RB Yes Yes No applicable
Columbina talpacoti RB Yes Yes No applicable
Patagioenas flavirostris RB Yes No No applicable
Streptopelia decaocto EX Yes Yes Introduced
Zenaida asiatica RB Yes Yes No applicable
Psittacidae
Amazona albifrons RB Yes No Special Protection
Amazona oratrix RB Yes No Extinction risk
Eupsittula nana RB Yes No Special Protection
Cyanoliseus patagonus EX No Yes Introduced
Myiopsitta monachus EX No Yes Introduced
Cuculidae
Coccyzus minor RB Yes Yes No applicable
Crotophaga sulcirostris RB Yes Yes No applicable
Trochilidae
Amazilia yucatanensis RB Yes No No applicable
Archilochus colubris WV Yes No No applicable
Alcedinidae
Megaceryle alcyon WV Yes No No applicable
Picidae
Melanerpes aurifrons RB Yes No No applicable
Picoides scalaris RB Yes No No applicable
Sphyrapicus varius WV Yes No No applicable
Tyrannidae
Contopus virens WV No No No applicable
Empidonax virescens WV No No No applicable
Myiarchus tyrannulus RB Yes No No applicable
Pitangus sulphuratus RB Yes Yes No applicable
Pyrocephalus rubinus RB Yes Yes No applicable
Sayornis phoebe WV No No No applicable
Tyrannus couchii RB Yes No No applicable
Tyrannus forficatus WV Yes No No applicable
Tyrannus melancholicus RB Yes No No applicable
Tyrannus tyrannus TM Yes No No applicable
Hirundinidae
Hirundo rustica WV Yes No No applicable
Polioptilidae
Polioptila caerulea RB Yes No No applicable
Turdidae
Turdus grayi RB Yes No No applicable
Mimidae
Dumetella carolinensis WV Yes No No applicable
Mimus glivus RB Yes Yes No applicable
Parulidae
Geothlypis trichas WV Yes No No applicable
Leiothlypis celata WV No No No applicable
Leiothlypis peregrina WV Yes No No applicable
Leiothlypis ruficapilla WV No No No applicable
Mniotilta varia WV Yes No No applicable
Parkesia noveboracensis WV Yes No No applicable
Seiurus aurocapilla WV Yes No No applicable
Setophaga americana WV Yes No No applicable
Setophaga coronata WV Yes No No applicable
Setophaga dominica WV Yes No No applicable
Setophaga fusca WV Yes No No applicable
Setophaga magnolia WV Yes No Threatened
Setophaga palmarum WV Yes No No applicable
Setophaga pensylvanica WV Yes No No applicable
Setophaga petechia bryanti RB Yes Yes No applicable
Setophaga ruticilla WV Yes No No applicable
Emberizidae
Sporophila moreletti RB Yes No No applicable
Passerculus sandwichensis WV Yes No No applicable
Thraupidae
Tangara episcopus WV No No No applicable
Cardinalidae
Passerina caerulea WV Yes No No applicable
Passerina cyanea WV Yes No No applicable
Pheucticus ludovicianus WV Yes No No applicable
Piranga rubra WV Yes No No applicable
Icteridae
Icterus galbula WV Yes Yes No applicable
Icterus spurius WV No No No applicable
Molothrus aeneus RB Yes Yes No applicable
Quiscalus mexicanus RB Yes Yes No applicable
Fringillidae
Spinus psaltria RB Yes Yes No applicable

APPENDIX 2

Species accumulation curve. The dot is the median value of the number of species and the vertical lines represent the estimated standard deviation in each sampling year. 

APPENDIX 3

Comparison of bird species richness among islands of GoM and the Mexican Caribbean. Data from AICAS-Conabio, 2002

Island Species (n) Surface (ha)
Isla del Carmen 137 13,550
Isla Contoy 123 5,126
Isla Cozumel 206 17,565
Islas Sonda de Campeche (I. Prez, I. Triángulo, Cayo Arcas) 118 9,188

Received: June 29, 2019; Accepted: January 17, 2020

*Corresponding author: jccanalesde@conacyt.mx

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License