SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.15 número4Reconversión productiva a palma de aceite en el Valle del Tulijá, Chiapas, México. Impacto diferenciado por géneroEnfoques de la resiliencia ante el cambio climático índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Agricultura, sociedad y desarrollo

versión impresa ISSN 1870-5472

agric. soc. desarro vol.15 no.4 Texcoco oct./dic. 2018

 

Articles

Profile and Situation of Producers who form the Street and Organic Markets in Mexico

Tzatzil I. Bustamante-Lara1  * 

Rita Schwentesius-Rindermann2 

1División de Ciencias Sociales y Administrativas Campus Celaya-Salvatierra. Universidad de Guanajuato. (tzatzi.bustamante@gmail.com).

2Profesora del Centro de Investigaciones Interdisciplinarias para el Desarrollo Rural Integral (CIIDRI) de la Universidad Autónoma Chapingo (rschwentesius@prodigy.net).


Abstract

In México, organic agriculture began in the seventies; since then, it has grown even in times of crisis. It is a production system that may have positive results in the income of small-scale farmers, rural paid workers, and even in rural development. In Mexico, since 1994, street and organic markets emerged. They arose as an initiative of producers and consumers, and since then they have been an alternative for the economic sustainability of the small-scale producers that form them. A bibliographic review about organic agriculture is presented: what it is, when and how it arose, what has been its development, and what systems ensure the organic quality in Mexico. Sustainability and its multidisciplinary character are also mentioned. Later, and through the results obtained from the application of 52 surveys directed towards producers from different street and organic markets, their profile is shown, their situation regarding production, commercialization, organic certification and economic sustainability, which increases as the producers increase their production, diversify their commercialization channels and have an organic certificate.

Key words: organic agriculture; guarantee systems; economic sustainability

Resumen

En México, la agricultura orgánica inició en los años sesenta; desde entonces, ha crecido incluso en época de crisis. Es un sistema de producción que puede tener resultados positivos tanto en el ingreso de los pequeños agricultores, asalariados rurales e incluso en el desarrollo rural. En México, a partir de 1994 surgieron los tianguis y mercados enfocados hacia lo orgánico. Se dieron como iniciativa de productores y consumidores, y desde entonces han sido una alternativa para la sostenibilidad económica de los pequeños productores que los integran. Se presenta una revisión bibliográfica sobre la agricultura orgánica, qué es, cuándo y cómo surgió, cuál ha sido su desarrollo, y qué sistemas garantizan su calidad de orgánico en México. Se menciona también la sostenibilidad y su carácter multidisciplinario. Posteriormente, y a través de los resultados obtenidos de la aplicación de 52 encuestas dirigidas a productores de diferentes tianguis y mercados orgánicos, se muestra su perfil, su situación respecto a: producción, comercialización, certificación orgánica y sostenibilidad económica, la cual aumenta a medida que los productores amplían su producción, diversifican sus canales de comercialización y cuentan con un certificado orgánico.

Palabras clave: agricultura orgánica; sistemas de garantía; sostenibilidad económica

Introduction

Agriculture is a set of techniques and knowledge developed to cultivate land. It is constituted by all the actions that humans can carry out to transform the natural environment. Its main purpose is the exploitation of resources originated by the land and favored by the action of man (Sáenz, 2009).

Throughout time, agriculture has developed in various ways, which has caused for there to be different types. These are based primordially on four factors. The first is according to their dependency on water. The second implies the magnitude of the production and its relationship with the market. Then, according to the ability of obtaining the maximum yield, or else, the minimum use of resources or other means of production; and, finally, based on the method and the objectives of production.

Although these types of agriculture are diverse, the main debate takes place around the methods and objectives about which this activity is carried out, which may be contained within four aspects as shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Aspects of the agricultural production systems. 

Tipo de agricultura Sistema de producción
Agricultura tradicional Es todo tipo de agricultura antes de la revolución verde (1920) (Gómez, 2000).
Agricultura convencional, industrial o moderna Cambió el modelo agrícola mediante la implementación de: paquetes tecnológicos intensivos, mecanización, mejoramiento genético y desarrollo de agroquímicos para el control de plagas, enfermedades y malezas (Altieri y Nicholls, 2000).
Agricultura orgánica "Es un sistema de producción que se basa en procesos ecológicos, biodiversidad y ciclos adaptados, combinando tradición, innovación y ciencia para beneficiar el medio ambiente y a la sociedad" (IFOAM, 2008).
Agricultura natural, integrada o mixta Es la combinación de la agricultura orgánica y la convencional, con el plus de la conciencia ambiental y la salud (Rendón, 2004).

Source: authors' elaboration based on various authors.

The approach of this study is between organic and conventional agriculture. In the case of the first, the International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements (IFOAM) considers it as1: “a production system that maintains the health of soils, ecosystems and people. It is based on ecological processes, biodiversity and the cycles adapted to local conditions, instead of the use of inputs with adverse effects. Organic agriculture combines tradition, innovation and science to benefit the shared environment and promote just relations and a good quality of life for everyone involved”.

In turn, conventional agriculture is known as a system that implements processes that allow increasing the speed of agriculture with the aim of increasing the production and the availability of foods per person (Gómez, 2000; Altieri and Nicholls, 2000). This system was based primarily in four schools. The first indicated the need for specialization. Therefore, scientists and agronomists began to ignore the need for integration of a system in a holistic manner. The second school was focused on the survival of the fittest, placing more attention on the competition and creating a fault in nature where there is more cooperation and interaction. Then, the third approximation towards conventional agriculture emerged. This was based on the theory by Justus Von Liebig (considered the father of chemical fertilization), indicating that there will always be a factor that will limit production, and that this factor should be overcome in order for productivity to increase. The fourth school was based on Malthus’ theories, who stated that population growth is exponential, while food production is arithmetic. Therefore, there would come a point when people would experience famine and the solution consisted in producing more (SOCLA AND TWIN, 2015). Concretely, they both differ in various themes.

Thus, according to its methods and objectives, organic agriculture is an alternative system to conventional agriculture, as shown in Table 2. There is a different point of view regarding production, both from the optic of the producer and a different product from the viewpoint of the consumer.

Table 2 Comparison between methods and objectives of conventional agriculture and organic agriculture. 

Producción según Agricultura orgánica Agricultura convencional
Objetivos Producción sostenible Producción masiva
Consumo local Consumo dirigido a la exportación
Métodos Trabaja con los ecosistemas de manera integral y respetando el medio ambiente Tiene un alto nivel de tecnificación
No emplea productos químicos y conserva la fertilidad de los suelos Requiere de alta inversión en capital
Mantiene la diversidad genética de los cultivos Utiliza agro tóxicos y plaguicidas
Se basa en la utilización óptima de los recursos naturales Hace uso del mejoramiento genético

Source: authors' elaboration based on: Gómez, 2000; Altieri and Nicholls, 2000; Rendón, 2004; and IFOAM, 2008.

From these types of agriculture (20th century) various facts have taken place, nowadays agricultural activity is mostly implemented intensively, in which the large companies have so much power that they even decide what and how much to produce, dictating then the consumption of the population (Escalona, 2009).

In addition, these companies also decide which will be the production methods, implementing technological packages that include improved seed, use of chemical fertilizers, control and management of pests and diseases, and sometimes the use of machinery, favoring large-scale farmers (Escalona, 2009).

In principle, although technology has increased the levels of production and the availability of foods per person, causing benefits to various producers, it has also generated difficulties. Close to 1.4 billion rural people are out of contact with modern agriculture. Almost all these people are peasants and indigenous people with small farms cultivated on slopes and valleys under traditional production methods. Of these people, nearly 370 million are extremely poor (affecting mostly the elderly, children and women). For the case of Mexico, Colombia, Guatemala and the Andes, approximately 19 to 37 million people are prone to a marginal environment (Altieri, 2008).

Specialization has led conventional agriculture towards monoculture, which currently occupies 90 % of the 1.5 billion hectares destined to this activity. It should be highlighted that monoculture is highly dependent on external inputs and energy; therefore, it impacts the environment negatively. It originates erosion, loss of soil fertility, exhaustion of the nutrient reserves, salinization, alkalinizing and pollution of water systems; loss of biodiversity and genetic resources, elimination of natural enemies, reappearance of pests, genetic resistance to pesticides, and destruction of the mechanisms of natural control (SOCLA and TWIN 2015; Altieri and Nicholls, 2000; Zayas et al., 2012; Gómez, 2000).

In response to these facts diverse initiatives have emerged. Through the design of diversified agro ecosystems and the use of technologies of low inputs, these initiatives have demonstrated the possibility of obtaining a balance between the environment and the yields, facilitating the investment of small-scale producers and providing possibilities outside conventional agriculture both to them and to consumers.

Among the alternatives most often resorted to for this, there is organic agriculture, which in addition to having environmental conservation and the regeneration of natural resources as objectives, attempts to ensure dietary self-sufficiency and to improve social equity and economic viability through the production of healthy foods, promoting fairer relationships and a good quality of life for everyone involved (Altieri and Nicholls, 2000; IFOAM, 2008). In addition, its processes have people as the central axis and it is considered as an alternative that satisfies the dietary and economic needs of consumers and producers, allowing “face to face” commerce, generating proposals for integration, coexistence, learning and a return to collectivity (Escalona, 2009). Therefore, this production system benefits and improves the environmental, economic, social and cultural criteria.

This study attempts to show through a descriptive analysis that the tianguis (street markets)2 and organic3 markets (which for the case of interest are considered spatially, that is, as places where the exchange of merchandises from organic agriculture takes place) are an alternative to improve the economic sustainability of small-scale producers who participate in them.

Theoretical Framework

This section allows analyzing more clearly the concepts most frequently used, which govern the theme of this research.

Organic agriculture

In the previous section the definition about what is considered to be the system of organic agriculture is mentioned, which for the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA)8, in addition to avoiding or excluding the use of fertilizers, pesticides, growth regulators and synthetically made additives, includes production technology based on crop rotation; the use of animal manure; the use of legumes, green fertilizers, organic residues (originated outside the property), natural minerals; aspects of biological pest control to maintain the structure and productivity of the soil, contributing nutrients for the plants and controlling insects, weeds and other pests; and mechanical farming, which makes organic agriculture be a development strategy that attempts to change some limitations found in conventional production in addition to a production method, since its foundation is not based solely on a better management of the soil and promotion of the use of local inputs, but also a higher added value and a fairer commercialization chain (Soto, 2003).

Market and tianguis (street market)

Throughout time man has found himself in the need to exchange. This is where the market concept derives, which is an economic model where certain needs or desires are attempted to be satisfied. This model has two actors, the offering and demanding parties, who will achieve the exchange provided that they both reach an agreement (Braudel, 1986).

To reach the market, man must: 1) be a producer of goods; 2) have the tendency to trade, swap or exchange something for another; therefore, it is necessary for there to be an excess in production; 3) assume a selfish behavior and act according to his interests; and 4) must have the certainty of being able to exchange the excess of his production (Smith, 1988).

The origin of the green, environmental, ecological, organic or sustainable market was in Europe (Coddington, 1993; Fisk, 1973; Fuller, 1999). It emerged due to the identification of some specific productions that are considered harmful to the terrestrial atmosphere (Shil, 2012). Since 1960 environmental issues gained importance because consumers became familiar with the products fabricated in an environment-friendly manner (Prakash, 2002). They are now more aware that, in addition to the health benefits, consuming organic products helps reduce the ecological footprint, decrease the distance that food travels from its origin to its place of consumption (since organic consumption is local), mitigate the effect of climate change, and it is the contribution of producers to biodiversity conservation, fair trade, sustainability and food security (Kilcher et al., 2011). In addition, consumers take into account the background and political strength of the organic movement; therefore, the awareness of the population and the role of the State promote the production and the consumption of these products (Gómez et al., 2004).

After 1980 the offering parties were pressured to improve the environmental damage generated by the production of the products they offered. Therefore, barriers arose and the producers resorted to strategies to respond correctly to this change (Peattie and Ratnayaka, 1995).

This generated alternatives towards markets that integrate all the activities, such as fabrication, management and commercialization. The aim was to facilitate the exchange and to satisfy human needs or desires. The strategies applied are: promotion of the product using attributes, systems, policies and processes which, in addition to increasing sales, make the companies or sellers work in issues of industrial ecology, considering these matters as an opportunity for responsibility, business development and entrepreneurial growth, generating the minimum negative impact on the environment (Prakash, 2002; Polonsky, 1994; Coddington, 1993).

Sustainability

The definition of large-scale sustainability is the capability to behave in a way which allows the possibility of having the current well-being, in the future or for future generations (Solow, 1991). However, this concept has a multidisciplinary character, since sustainability may be: economic, environmental and sociocultural. Therefore, there is no specific objective about what should be inherited to future generations.

For the case of this study, the economic approach of sustainability is what is most interesting, since the objective is to understand the fact that implementing a productive method alternative to the conventional, and becoming integrated in a tianguis or organic market, can improve the economic situation of small-scale producers.

Then, sustainability is “a set of economic patterns through which intergenerational welfare does not decrease” (Arrow et al., 2010). Therefore, sustainability must take into account that the companies or people who are devoted to the production of goods or services will consider the conditions of the economy to continue with their productive strategies. This implies that the investment in sustainability will increase when the economy is restrictive, because it will seek the way of doing more with less, which tends to increase the sustainability strategies due to innovation (Barnett et al., 2014).

Now it is necessary to reach a consensus on the definition of sustainability and its relationship to agriculture, as well as the conditions for both to happen.

Sustainability and agriculture

Sustainability must reduce costs and increase the economic efficiency and viability, promoting a diverse and flexible agricultural system (Altieri and Nichols, 2000).

The hypothesis is that a system will be economically sustainable if it provides dietary self-sufficiency, if it generates an annual income for the family group, and if it decreases the risk in time (Sarandón et al., 2008).

A sustainable agricultural production system allows maintaining the goods and services that satisfy the economic, ecological and sociocultural needs of individuals through time within the physical limits of the agro-ecosystems that sustain those needs. That is, that the satisfaction of the needs of the population cannot be achieved at the expense of natural resources (Sarandón et al., 2008). Consequently, the conditions necessary to implement sustainable agriculture are: 1) that it is sufficiently productive; 2) economically viable; 3) ecologically adequate; and 4) culturally and socially acceptable (Sarandón, 2002).

Therefore, sustainable organic agriculture takes place when it provides: dietary self-sufficiency, sufficient income, and a decrease in economic risk. When it conserves or improves the base of productive resources, avoiding or reducing the impact on the resources, and when it maintains or improves social capital, both in their quality of life and in their level of dependency, degree of social integration, level of awareness and ecological knowledge (Sarandón et al., 2008).

Situation of organic agriculture in Mexico

In Mexico, organic agriculture emerged as a result of influence from foreign countries that began to demand tropical and winter products, produced under an organic system. This request took place through some trading companies, NGOs and religious groups (Liberation Theology) (Gómez et al., 2010). Organic production in Mexico began in areas where the synthesis inputs were not used; such was the case of indigenous regions and traditional agriculture areas in the states of Chiapas and Oaxaca (Gómez et al., 2010).

Later, the consumers took on an important role in the development and establishment of markets directed towards the sale of organic products, recognizing that through their choice they could generate a positive effect both in the environment and in the welfare of small-scale producers (Soto, 2003).

From its beginning, the growth in organic production has had a large impact in Mexico (Gómez et al., 2004). This growth is centered in the states of Chiapas, Oaxaca, Veracruz (states where around 70 % of the country’s biodiversity is found) and Michoacán (Gómez et al., 2010). This denotes the particular dimension of organic agriculture in Mexico, since its production is closely linked to the geography of poverty and biodiversity, connecting mostly with small-scale producers characterized mainly by their levels of poverty and marginalization (Gómez et al., 2010). Therefore, a correct strategy can lead those who carry out this agricultural activity to the reduction of their dietary dependency, the generation of rural employment, the improvement in their income, the reduction of migration from poverty, and the generation of positive externalities (Gómez et al., 2010).

Between 1996 and 2008, its annual growth was more than 3 %. As a result of this, formal employment has increased up to 26 % annually. Concerning the currencies, an increase of 28 % took place and more than 129 000 producers and 400 000 hectares have been involved (Gómez et al., 2010). In terms of the production surface, an increase has also been seen during the last decade, going from 23 265 hectares in 1996 to more than 400 000 ha in 2005 (De la Cruz et al., 2012, citing Gómez 2005).

In the period of 1996 to 2012, there has been an increase of 17.31 % of the Mean Rate of Annual Growth (Tasa Media de Crecimiento Annual, TMCA) in Mexico, regarding the number of producers who work under the standards of organic production, as shown in Figure 1.

Source: authors’ elaboration based on information by Gómez et al., 2010.

Figure 1 Mexico. Number of producers under the organic production system (1996-2012). 

The growth of the organic sector represents an advantage in the struggle to attain a more sustainable dietary system. Therefore, it is necessary to implement institutional plans that allow a broader development, plans and programs that are focused on the internal market, where the small-scale producers are the ones who could obtain comparative advantages (De la Cruz et al., 2012).

It is also important that small-scale producers become organized with the goal of eliminating the exclusion that globalization has generated. In order for this, it would be necessary: 1) to enter the market with high-quality products and in adequate volumes; 2) to implement internal systems of control that ensure the compliance of criteria for organic production; 3) to have training to protect the quality and guidelines of production; 4) to make organic production a way of life, rather than a production system; and 5) to create technical panels to promote a greater commitment between producers (Gómez and Gómez, 2004).

Presently there is a higher number of commercialization initiatives through many channels, such as specialized stores, holistic stores and coffee shops. However, the importance of the tianguis and organic markets is that both in rural and urban communities they help to connect the populations from the farmland and the city, to promote the regional market, and to consume directly and at a fair price for producers and consumers. In addition, they help to generate ecological and social awareness to produce and consume responsibly, they promote the principles of organic agriculture and they offer spaces for sharing and learning (REDAC, 2013). Therefore, it is expected that the integration of small-scale producers to tianguis or organic markets that are part of the REDAC will increase and it will help them to increase their production, improve their levels of commercialization, and therefore, to increase their economic sustainability.

This is because the integration into a tianguis or market allows the producer to acquire certain obligations and benefits. For example, the producer is forced to comply with the requirements considered within organic production, which originates higher credibility for people who purchase his product. In addition, they have a fixed space to commercialize their products, making it easy for people who visit the tianguis or organic markets of the network every week to locate them. Therefore, it is considered that the relationship between the income of small-scale producers and the markets and tianguis that make up the REDAC is positive.

Creation of the first tianguis and organic markets in Mexico

In Mexico, the first tianguis or organic markets emerged independently and in different contexts, although always in urban areas. In their beginning they were established taking advantage of the support by educational, cultural or municipal institutions. The main characteristic of their appearance was the preoccupation about the risk to health, fostered by the forms of production, processing and commercialization of foods, in addition to the impact of these systems on the environment (Escalona, 2009).

The beginning of these tianguis and organic markets took place in Guadalajara in 1998; the first proposal was established as a sales point called Ecotienda, which arose due to the concern of various citizens to continue with the practices learned in the environmental education workshops promoted by Jalisco’s Ecological Collective in the decade of the 1980s. Later, various producers connected, establishing the Circle of Responsible Production and Consumption, transforming the Ecotienda into a weekly space to carry out the exchange between farmland and city, promoting local alternatives of organic production, fair trade and responsible consumption, where the activities of teaching, promotion, outreach and market relations are fundamental (García, 2015).

The Network of Consumers of Organic Producers was created in Chapingo in 2001, from the initiative of students, academia and consumers. By 2003, with the participation of academic groups from the Universidad Autónoma Chapingo, consumers, civil society organizations, students and producers, this idea transformed into the Chapingo Organic Tianguis, whose intention was to carry out material, cultural and market relations exchange where the main idea was direct sales (García, 2015).

The third initiative took place due to the interest of consumers and producers worried for the environment, safety and food security, who organized three organic fairs, contacting producers from the municipality of Teocelo (Veracruz). The idea of opening a permanent organic market was a result of this, and by 2003 the Xalapa Agroecological Tianguis was created. The Universidad Veracruzana supported this project and contributed academic staff for its coordination. The main idea of this tianguis was the promotion of producers from nearby rural areas and direct sales (García, 2015).

By 2003 the El Pochote Organic Tianguis arose as protest against the installation of a McDonald’s in the historical center of Oaxaca. This project was carried out from the initiative of professors, artists, and producers invited (the main promoter was Professor Francisco Toledo) (Nelson et al., 2007).

Another one of the initiatives of tianguis and organic markets in Mexico is the Tlaxcala Alternative Market. The meetings for its creation began in 2003; however, the market began activities in 2005. Its aim was the promotion of a culture of responsible consumption and agroecological production in its social, economic, environmental and cultural aspects. The development of this market took place with the participation of Ana Elena Caballero (coordinator of the project), organizations like Proyecto de Desarrollo Integral Vicente Guerrero A.C., Centro Campesino para el Desarrollo Sustentable A.C., Casa de Promoción Social Presentación de Tlaxcala and Herbario de Tlaxcala. Among other actors, the following: Dr. Rita Schwentesius, Dr. Manuel Ángel Gómez Cruz, and M.Sc. Laura Gómez Tovar, who provided advice in the process; Mr. Santiago Martini, Mrs. Ofelia Cova Juárez and Dr. Jürgens (with support in cooperative principles, promotion and productive processes, respectively) (García, 2015).

Among the main characteristics of the markets there is the promotion of a better diet through organic products, and the protection of the environment; however, all the street and organic markets are independent entities and each one has its own characteristics (REDAC, 2013; Schwentesius et al., 2013).

For these initiatives of commercialization to function, producers must be organized to request supports, access to information, and to increase the credibility of their production methods (Gómez et al., 2005).

In the next section, the origin, objectives, functioning and integration of the Mexican Network of Street and Organic Markets (Red Mexicana de Tianguis y Mercados Orgánicos) will be addressed, which is one of the most important actors in Mexico for the development of this type of agriculture at the small and medium scale.

Red Mexicana de Tianguis y Mercados Orgánicos

The Mexican Network of Street and Organic Markets (Red Mexicana de Tianguis y Mercados Orgánicos REDAC) was created in 2004. It was constituted legally in 2008 with the objective of gaining access to financial resources for its development. It is a civil society group, integrated by street markets and local and regional organic markets of small-scale or medium-scale producers, consumers and promoters. From 2004 to 2010 the REDAC had the financial support of the Falls Brook Centre NGO from Canada; this allowed covering the expenses of two to three meetings per year, paying for two representatives per market or tianguis, food, lodgings and transport expenses; in addition, the expenses for promotion and outreach were also covered. During 2010 and 2011 financing was secured from SAGARPA to support the Participative Certification (Certificación Participativa, CP); with this, training workshops were organized around production and certification, as well as outreach materials. It should be highlighted that currently the network does not receive direct economic contributions from members of the organic and street markets (Schwentesius et al., 2013).

Because the tianguis and organic markets are located from Baja California to Chiapas, in 2010 the REDAC was divided into three regions: center-north, gulf and south (Schwentesius et al., 2013).

Its origin took place due to the growing number of tianguis and organic markets throughout the Mexican republic, especially in the center and south of the country. The emergence of these markets was from the initiative of academia, consumers and NGOs, who invited producers to sell their products to them once a week (Schwentesius et al., 2013). The network has the organizational structure shown in Figure 2.

Source: authors’ elaboration based on information by Schwentesius et al. (2013).

Figure 2 Organizational structure of the REDAC. 

Among the main objectives of the network, according to its bylaws, the following are included: promoting the reconversion of conventional and natural products to organic, and the development and adaptation of alternative eco-technologies, decreasing the dependency on elements outside the system; advising in matters of CP; connecting and promoting the different tianguis and organic markets in Mexico, strengthening the local and fair trade; performing diagnostic studies of economic, technological and social type; participating in academic, scientific and outreach events at the national and international level; promoting training activities through courses, workshops, conferences and other media; and celebrating the contracts and executing the acts that are relative and related to social aims; and acquiring the personal and real estate property for the branches and services of the Association, in addition to participating actively in the design and formulation of public policies related to the local production of organic products (Schwentesius et al., 2013).

The REDAC also has the specific goal of improving the land through organic agriculture and the participants in the markets that are part of the network, taking into account the concept of sustainability in which they include ecological, economic, sociocultural, and health factors (Schwentesius et al., 2013).

Currently, the network has a total of 21 tianguis and organic markets in 15 states throughout the Mexican Republic.

Methodology

As is suggested in the objectives, this research seeks to carry out a measure of sustainability among small-scale producers that make up the tianguis and organic markets from the redac in their economic criterion.

Concerning the objective of measuring sustainability, this was done in three phases:

  • Planning the study: here, the method and approach which would direct the study was considered, as well as the reach and design of the study, and the design and trial of the collection instruments.

  • Gathering and capturing information: includes the selection of the target population, the application of the collection instrument and the design of the database and information capture.

  • Univariate analysis: the descriptive, graphic and correlation analysis that will help to describe the situation of the producers who make up the tianguis and organic markets of the REDAC in spheres such as: general data of the producer; production, costs, income and earnings; commercialization; and, organic certification. In addition, this phase contemplates the indicators that will help to measure the sustainability.

Planning the research

Method and approach of the study

Any time the concept of sustainability is approached, a multi-criteria approach and the establishment ordinal measurement scales and univariate analysis methods must be carried out (Rendón, 2004). This study is not the exception, since it considers the economic, ecological and sociocultural criteria in measuring the sustainability of small-scale producers, and it uses scales that indicate the degree of importance of certain factors for production, producers, etc. In addition, these scales help classify the degree of sustainability of certain indicators. Regarding univariate analysis, frequency distributions are done through graphs, central tendency measures, and some dispersion measures.

Reach and design of the study

It is a non-experimental transversal study, for the variables were not manipulated and data collection took place in a single moment in time. The research has three reaches; the first is that it is a descriptive study, since it shows the characteristics and circumstances of small-scale producers of the organic sector that have decided to join the tianguis or organic markets of the REDAC. In addition it is a study of correlational reach, since it associates variables which in this case are producers towards a pattern, which is the integration to tianguis or organic markets and for a population group which are the small-scale producers of the markets that make up the REDAC. Likewise, it is a study of explicative reach because it establishes causes, which for this case are that the integration of producers to these markets provides them sustainability in the economic, ecological and sociocultural aspect.

Collection instrument

The information was collected with primary sources obtained through the application of surveys to actors who participate in the organic sector at the local level; that is, producing and trading at a small scale and inside their localities. Therefore, the target population was divided into two groups: 1) producers who are part of the street or organic markets belonging to the REDAC; and 2) coordinators of these tianguis and markets.

Two questionnaires were elaborated, one structured and directed at producers and one semi-structured questionnaire for the coordinators. They were both applied to a small sample as pilot questionnaires, with the aim of testing their pertinence and efficacy both in matters of application and in results. Then, errors were corrected and some response options were modified to then obtain the definitive instrument.

The questionnaires were applied personally and before beginning with the responses, it was mentioned to producers that their responses were for academic aims and the personal data anonymous.

For the case of the producers, the questionnaire included 58 questions divided in four sections: a) identification of producers; b) production and commercialization; c) certification; and d) organic production. In addition, the perspective about the economic, ecological and sociocultural sustainability obtained by producers when participating in tianguis or organic markets was considered.

A semi-structured interview was applied to the coordinators, which included 32 questions about the constitution, initiative, functioning, location, organization and integration to define the situation of the tianguis or organic market within a descriptive context.

Unit of analysis

The REDAC has 21 tianguis and organic markets in 15 states throughout the Mexican Republic. However, due to the size of the terrain, the time and the estimation of the resources necessary to carry out the application of the questionnaires, it was decided to select nearby tianguis and markets with some similarities and ease in terms of access to information.

Therefore, the following eight tianguis and organic markets were selected.

Gathering and capturing information

Selection of the target population and size of the sample

The target population is producers and coordinators of the street and organic markets shown in Figure 3. Application of the questionnaire was carried out with the highest number of producers found in the tianguis and markets at the moment of performing the visit and, regarding the coordinators, eight were interviewed, one in each tianguis (however, there are tianguis where there is more than one coordinator).

Source: authors’ elaboration.

Figure 3 Tianguis and organic markets surveyed (location and schedule). 

Application of the collection instrument

The data were collected in diverse moments between August 2014 and December 2015. Eight states were visited in the Mexican Republic: Estado de México, Oaxaca, Puebla, Tlaxcala and Veracruz, applying a total of 69 questionnaires to producers and eight semi-structured interviews to coordinators as shown in Table 3.

Table 3 Tianguis and organic markets surveyed, number of producers, and date of visit. 

Tianguis o mercado Productores % de encuestas Fecha de visita
Mercado Agroecológico Xalapa 11 16 3 de agosto de 2014
Mercado Alternativo Tlaxcala 6 9 8 de agosto de 2014
Tianguis Orgánico Apizaco 5 7 5 de noviembre 2014
Tianguis Alternativo de Puebla 10 15 8 de noviembre de 2014
Bosque de Agua 6 9 12 de noviembre de 2014
Tianguis Orgánico Chapingo 14 20 29 de noviembre de 2014
Total 52 100 -

Source: authors' elaboration based on surveys applied from August 2014 to November 2015.

Database design and information capture

The survey was captured in the Google Drive application, which is a tool to store, process and share documents. Later, the information obtained was exported to a database designed in the Microsoft Office Excel software, to carry out the correlation and analysis of the data.

Information analysis

The third phase is about the univariate analysis of the information that was obtained through the survey application. However, this is shown in the next section as results because the way in which it was developed is primarily descriptive, graphic and of correlations in spheres such as: producer’s general data; production, costs, income and earnings; commercialization; organic certification. This phase also includes the evaluation of sustainability that is shown next.

Profile and situation of small-scale producers from REDAC tianguis and organic markets

In total, 52 questionnaires were applied and the information obtained in this regard was the following.

Identification of the producer

The average age of the people who participated in the tianguis and organic markets is 44 years; 58% of the survey respondents are men and 42 % are women; 50 % are married and 71 % mentioned they have children. Only 13 % belongs to an ethnic group; 85% owns a house and the rest pay a monthly rent that goes from $1,500 pesos (minimum) to $4200 pesos (maximum).

Regarding schooling, 52 % has university studies, 17 % secondary, 13 % graduate studies, 6 % high school, 12 % primary school (not finished in all cases).

Production and commercialization

Of producers, 84 % are devoted to the production and commercialization of organic products. Of the total of people surveyed, 31 indicated that they entered the tianguis or market through a request where they described their products, production methods and suppliers (in case of having them); later, a visit was performed to the production area and there was a decision made. Six people indicated that their entry to the tianguis was by invitation from the street market. Two people indicated that their entry to the tianguis or market was through some association and the rest didn’t specify how they entered the street market.

Of them, 48 % receives technical assistance from their own tianguis (13 %) and 37 % through another means. The people mentioned that technical advice has taught them new production methods and pest prevention, it helps them to improve the organization, improve the productive process, improve soil nutrition, decrease the production costs, and reduce losses.

Of them, 87 % sells their products in another place; 48 % of this percentage sells in other tianguis or organic markets, 13 % in their locality, 6 % in markets or conventional stores, 6 % in fairs, expos and bazaars, and the rest (37) in other places. The reasons that the producers mentioned as to why they decided to sell their products in other places are:

  • To increase the commercialization channels, because of the type of places where they sell (which are organic or natural),

  • To increase their margin of profit,

  • For people to get to know their products,

  • To avoid reducing their production,

  • To broaden the concept of organic,

  • For the direct link to the markets where they work,

  • Due to demand from people,

  • Because they seek to share their products with more people.

Only 19 % belongs to some organized group of organic producers; the groups mentioned were:

  • Coatepec A. C.

  • Texcotli A.C.

  • Sociedad Mexicana de la Producción Orgánica

  • SOMEXPRO

  • Asociación de Productores de Tuna Orgánica del Valle de Teotihuacán

  • Grupo Vicente Guerrero

  • Asociación Centro Campesino para el Desarrollo Sustentable A.C.

  • Comité de Sistemas de Producción Apícola del Estado de México.

  • Asociación de apicultores de Tlalmanalco Estado de México

  • Sociedad de Productores Rurales de la Zona Oriente del Estado de México

  • Asociación de Apicultores Alchichica, Puebla

  • Asociación de Apicultores de Perote, Veracruz

  • Centro de Recolección. Distribución y Venta de Productos Orgánicos Vida Verde

  • Productores Orgánicos de Xochimilco A.C.

  • Productores Agrícolas de montaña

  • UNORCA

  • GREENPACE (Puebla)

They decided to join because belonging to one of these organizations helps promote organic production, generates learning, credibility, and there is better communication between the government and the producers. In addition, there is greater participation in events promoting organic products and resources can be obtained.

The average hours worked per week is 26.22; those who devote most hours to organic production work 70 hours and those who devote less, two hours (three people did not reply).

Of them, 79 % have people who help them to produce or harvest. The average number of people employed is 2.92 per producer; however, the highest number of employees per producer is 10, while there are 10 people who do not employ anyone. Of these people, 54 % are family members and the average hours they help to work is 7.38 hours; those who get helped most reported 70 hours per worker, but the hours worked depend on the time of the year and the crop. Of the producers, 48 % reported that they pay employees from 0 to 500 pesos weekly; 21 %, 501 to 1000 pesos; and 8 %, 1501 to 2000 pesos.

Organic certification

Of the survey respondents, 69 % have some type of organic certification; 7 % do not and 17 % are in process of certification (generally it is participative certification; only one person mentioned that he had both, participative and by agency, the agency used is CERTIMEX).

Of the 52 people surveyed, three did not respond, while 13 mentioned that it doesn’t cost them anything; the average that the 36 remaining people pay for their (annual) certification is $387.77. Of them, 81 % mentioned that having the organic certification influences positively the sale of their products and 73 % indicated that the use of a seal would also be beneficial to increase their sales since it generates greater trust in the consumer.

In terms of their weekly income, producers reported the following:

Of them, 58 % mentions they receive income from activities other than organic production.

Most of the producers consider that organic production is profitable; they mention that in addition to the increase they obtain in income, they also supply themselves and consume in a healthier manner. They sell all they produce, their production does not require many expenses and people seek organic products, since they are of higher quality and healthier. However, not all the producers consider that this production system is profitable. One of the main causes of this is the lack of market.

Of producers, 81 % consider that the payment they receive over the sale of their products is just since it is they who set the price, sell quality and people pay for it; in addition, the product goes straight to the consumer, which allows them to recover the production costs, since there are no intermediaries. The investment is low, they do what they like and, at the same time, they generate profits.

Conclusions

Growth has taken place both in the organic sector and in the tianguis and organic markets. There are also a higher number of producers who participate in this production system and with this they increase their economic sustainability and help to improve the environment.

Table 4 Weekly distribution of the income over the sale of organic products. 

Rango de ingreso semanal Número de productores dentro del rango % de productores dentro del rango Rango de ingreso semanal Número de productores dentro del rango % de productores dentro del rango
0 a 500 pesos 13 25 % 1501 a 2000 pesos 10 19 %
501 a 1000 pesos 10 19 % 2001 a 2500 pesos 4 8 %
1001 a 1500 pesos 5 10 % 2501 pesos en adelante 10 19 %

Source: authors’ elaboration based on the result of surveys applied in 2014.

Organic production is doubtless a system that favors small-scale producers. In principle, it helps them to satisfy their consumption autonomously, reducing their expenses and allowing them a better diet. Also, a large part of producers consider the fact that participating in some tianguis or organic market gives them more credibility over the product they sell, because in order to become part of one of these means of commercialization it is necessary to carry out the certification of their products, which although it is done inside the market it gives them the guarantee of offering an organic product.

However, it is necessary to create proposals for the action of agricultural and ecological/economic policies that connect important aspects for small-scale producers. The internal increase of consumption of organic products is also necessary, as well as developing promotion strategies that help people become aware about the benefits of organic agriculture and local consumption.

From producers and for the development of organic markets there should be a record of data about production, consumption sales, and prices of organic products, with the aim of generating transparency and trust (Källander and Rundgren, 2009).

As Altieri and Nicholls (2000) mention, at the institutional level the public sector must ensure that the poor are not excluded from the benefits of agricultural development; equity must reach the rural communities through real opportunities for them to become protagonists and solve their problems without farmers losing their autonomy, organization, culture and natural resources.

REFERENCES

Altieri, M. 2008. Agroecology: environmentally sound and socially just alternatives to the industrial farming model. University of California Berkeley. Revisado 14 de agosto de 2014. http://www.agroeco.org/publications 2 p. [ Links ]

Altieri, M., y Nicholls, C. 2000. Agroecología: Teoría y práctica para una agricultura sustentable. 1ra edición, Serie Textos Básicos para la Formación Ambiental, Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Medio Ambiente (PNUD), Red de Formación Ambiental para América Latina y El Caribe, México D.F. [ Links ]

Arrow, K. J., Dasgupta, P., Lawrence, H. G., Mumford, K. J., y Oleson, K. 2010. Sustainability and the measurement of wealth en NBER working paper series. Cambridge, MA. [ Links ]

Barnett, M. L., Darnall, N., and Husted, B. W. 2014 Sustainability strategy in constrained economic times en Elsevier Ltd, ScienceDirect. [ Links ]

Braudel, F. 1986. La dinámica del capitalismo. Fondo de Cultura Económica, México D.F. 48 p. [ Links ]

Coddington, W. 1993. Environmental marketing’s new relationship with corporate environmental management. In: Environmental Quality Management Vol. 2, No.3, Revisado el 04 de abril de 2015 En: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com.sci-hub.org/doi/10.1002/tqem.3310020310/abstract. pp: 297-302. [ Links ]

Coddington, W. 1993. Environmental marketing’s new relationship with corporate environmental management. In: Environmental Quality Management Vol.2, No.3, Revisado el 04 de abril de 2015. En http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com.sci-hub.org/doi/10.1002/tqem.3310020310/abstract. pp: 297-302. [ Links ]

De la Cruz R., S., Gómez, T. L., Gómez, C. M. A., y Schwentesius R., R. 2012. Regulación y normatividad de la agricultura orgánica en México y en el mundo en: Competencia y dinámicas de ajuste en la horticultura. Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa. Coordinadores: Gaxiola C., H. E., Schwentesius R., R., Gómez C., M. A., Avendaño R., B. D., y Trujillo F., J. de D. México D.F. [ Links ]

Escalona, A. M. A. 2009. Los tianguis y mercados locales de alimentos ecológicos en México: su papel en el consumo, la producción y la conservación de la biodiversidad y la cultura. Tesis doctoral. Universidad de Córdoba, España. 420 p. [ Links ]

Frisk, G. 1973. Criteria for a theory of responsible consumption. In: The Journal of Marketing, Vol. 37. No. 2. pp: 24-31. [ Links ]

Fuller, D. A. 1999. Sustainable marketing: Managerial-ecological issues. Sage Publications, Inc. California. 395 p. [ Links ]

García, B. R. 2015. Tianguis alternativos locales en México, como puntos de encuentro micropolítico: en la búsqueda de posibilidades de vida en el presente. Tesis doctoral. Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Facultad de Economía. Puebla, Pue. 261 p. [ Links ]

Gómez C., M.A., Schwentesius, R.R., Ortigoza, R.J., Gómez, T.L., May, T.V., López R., U.I., Arreola Q., J.A., y Noriega, A. G. 2010. Agricultura, Apicultura y Ganadería Orgánicas de México 2009. Estado actual-Retos-Tendencias. Universidad Autónoma Chapingo (UACh) Centro de Investigaciones Interdisciplinarias para el Desarrollo Rural Integral (CIIDRI). Chapingo, Estado de México, Octubre. [ Links ]

Gómez, T. L., Martin, L., Gómez C., M. A., and Mutersbaugh, T. 2005. Certified organic agriculture in Mexico: Market connections and certification practices in large and small producers. In: Journal of Rural Studies Vol. 21, No.4. pp: 461-474. [ Links ]

Gómez, T. L., y Gómez C., M. A. 2004. La agricultura orgánica en México: Un ejemplo de incorporación y resistencia a la globalización. Revisado 14 de agosto de 2014 en Revisado 14 de agosto de 2014 en http://dlc.dlib.indiana.edu/dlc/handle/10535/1679Links ]

Gómez, P. A. 2000. Agricultura orgánica: una alternativa posible. Programa de agroecología, documentos CEUTA. Domínguez, A., y Prieto, G. R., (coords). In: Perfil ambiental del Uruguay Nordan. Montevideo, Uruguay. pp: 14-30. [ Links ]

IFOAM. 2008. Sistemas Participativos de Garantía: Estudios de caso en América Latina. International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements (IFOAM), Alemania. [ Links ]

Källander, I., y Rundgren, G. 2009. Construyendo sectores orgánicos sustentables. International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements (IFOAM), Alemania. [ Links ]

Kilcher, L., Willer, H., Huber, B., Frieden, C., Schmutz, R., and Schmid, O. 2011. Organic Market in Europe: Overview and market Access Information for Producers and International Trade of Companies. Fourteen Country Examples in the European Free Trade Association and the European Union, with a Special Focus on Switzerland. 3era ed. SIPPO and FiBL, 268 p. [ Links ]

Nelson, E., Schwentesius, R.R., Gómez, T. L., y Gómez C., M. A. 2007. Experiencias de la Red Mexicana de Tianguis y Mercados Orgánicos: el nacimiento de un movimiento orgánico local en México. En http://www.tianguisorganicos.org.mx/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/ExperienciasREDAC.pdfLinks ]

Peattie, K., y Ratnayaka, M. 1995. Responding to the Green movement. In: Industrial Management Vol. 21, New York, NY. pp:103-110. [ Links ]

Polonsky, M. J. 1994. An introduction to Green marketing. In: Electronic Green Journal Vol. 1, No. 2. pp: 1-10. [ Links ]

Prakash, A. 2002. Green marketing, public policy and managerial strategies. In: Business Strategy an Environment Vol. 11, No. 5. pp: 285-297. [ Links ]

REDAC. 2013. Antecedentes. Revisado en mayo de 2013 Revisado en mayo de 2013 http://tianguisorganicos.org.mx/antecedentes/ . [ Links ]

Rendón, M. R. 2004. Evaluación comparativa de sustentabilidad en sistemas agrícolas convencionales, mixtos y orgánicos de México. Tesis doctoral; Universidad Autónoma Chapingo, Centro de Investigaciones Económicas, Sociales y Tecnológicas de la Agroindustria y la Agricultura Mundial (CIESTAAM), Chapingo, Estado de México, agosto. [ Links ]

Sáenz D., A. M. 2009. La agricultura y su evolución a la agroecología. Obra propia Editorial. España. [ Links ]

Sarandón, S. J. 2002. El desarrollo y uso de indicadores para evaluar la sustentabilidad de los agroecosistemas. In: Agroecología. El camino para una agricultura sustentable. pp: 393-414. [ Links ]

Sarandón, S. J., Zuluaga, M. S., Cieza, R., Gómez, C., Janjetic, L., y Negrete, E. 2008. Evaluación de la sustentabilidad de sistemas agrícolas de fincas en Misiones, Argentina, mediante el uso de indicadores. In: Agroecología, 1. pp: 19-28. [ Links ]

Schwentesius, R. R., Gómez C., M. A., y Nelson, E. 2013. La Red Mexicana de Tianguis y Mercados Orgánicos- México: Renovando sistemas de abasto de bienes de primera necesidad para pequeños productores y muchos consumidores. In: Sistemas Participativos de Garantía: Estudios de caso en América Latina. International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements (IFOAM), [ Links ]

Shil, P. A. 2012. Evolution and future of environmental marketing. In: Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing & Management Review Vol. 1 No. 3, pp: 74-81. [ Links ]

Smith, A. 1988. Investigación sobre la naturaleza y causas de la riqueza de las naciones. Editorial, Oikos-Tau, Barcelona, España, pp: 95-106. [ Links ]

SOCLA and TWIN. 2015. Agroecology: Key concepts, principles and practices. Jutaprint, Malaysia. 52 p. [ Links ]

Solow, R. M. 1991. Sustainability: an economist’s perspective en la Lectura 18 de J. Seward Johnson, para el Centro de la política marítima, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution en Woods Hole, Massachusetts, Junio. [ Links ]

Soto, G. 2003. Memoria del taller: Agricultura orgánica; una herramienta para el desarrollo rural sostenible y la reducción de la pobreza. Texto: Expositores y organizadores del taller. Elaboración: Gabriela Soto, coordinadora del taller Turrialba, Costa Rica. [ Links ]

Zayas, B. R. A., Zayas, B. I., y Castro, M. J. A. 2012. Agricultura orgánica: alternativa del futuro para el desarrollo sustentable. In: Competencia y dinámicas de ajuste en la horticultura. Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa, 1 era ed. Coordinadores: Gaxiola C., H. E., Schwentesius, R. R., Gómez C., M. A., Avendaño R., B. D., y Trujillo F., J. de D. México. pp: 435-448. [ Links ]

2Tianguis: it is a space where the exchange of merchandise takes place, in an open area.

3Market: it is a closed place with various established fixed spots.

Received: May 2015; Accepted: August 2017

Creative Commons License Este es un artículo publicado en acceso abierto bajo una licencia Creative Commons